🇺🇸🇺🇦 Q: Why are long-range strikes on Ukraine still viewed as escalatory? A: Long range strikes don't help Ukraine liberate their territory, "and of course we're worried about escalation." An absolutely clownish response. 🤡🤡🤡

Full transcript.

The US is just scared of russia. Simple as that. Ukrainians proved that they can literally invade russia without escalation.

So hitting Russian airports where the planes that drop glide bombs on Ukraine DAILY, won't help liberate Ukraine? Not only do the planes that use these airfields drop bombs on civilians but they also get concentrations of troops. I'm no military expert, but taking out military airfields and fighter jets seems like it would help Ukraine retake her territory.... And it would save civilian lives...

Ukraine hasn't won. If we want them to win, then we need them to escalate. If we want a stalemate we must avoid escalation. So... what do we want?

It’s obvious to just about everyone that The West is scared shitless of Russia.

Voicing this out loud is moronic and playing right into Putins hands, how soft have the west become 👎🏼

"Long range strikes don't help Ukraine liberate their territory..." umm.. yes, they do. Take out Russian rear area logistics and command and control, as well as air power - and suddenly those ground combat forces are much easier to defeat, especially when they run out of ammo.. #Military_Tactics_for_Dummies

Thank you for paying attention to my question. Here's the full video and response for a more complete picture.

The Putin regime is nurtured and propped up by the US. Let's be brutally frank, so that everyone understands the situation. The truth is harsh but it is what it is