Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Quantum Computers to Hit Banks First Before Bitcoin? Billionaire investor Tim Draper (Tim Draper) says quantum computers are more likely to crack banks before Bitcoin $BTC. Draper argued that Bitcoin holders would have options if the network ever faced a quantum attack. He added that the community could fork...

16,101 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 JAPAN JUST PUT A REAL QUANTUM COMPUTER ONLINE FOR THE WORLD TO ACCESS. And most people still don’t realize how big this moment is. For decades, quantum computers sounded like science fiction: machines that use quantum states instead of ordinary binary bits. Now researchers in Japan have opened access to a real superconducting quantum system connected to the internet. Why this matters: • quantum simulations • next-generation AI research • new material discovery • drug development • cryptography disruption • solving problems impossible for classical computers But quantum computers work nothing like normal machines. A regular computer checks possibilities one at a time. A quantum computer can explore many probability states simultaneously through superposition and entanglement. In simple terms: It doesn’t just calculate faster… It calculates differently. That’s why these systems look so strange. The giant gold structure isn’t “the computer” itself. It’s an ultra-cold dilution refrigerator designed to keep the quantum processor near absolute zero so fragile quantum states don’t collapse. The terrifying implication is this: Humanity may be entering the first era where computation starts operating on the rules of quantum reality itself. And once quantum hardware becomes scalable… Entire industries may be rewritten from the ground up. What happens when computers stop thinking like machines… and start behaving like physics itself? Which field do you think gets transformed first and would you actually trust it with something important?

Paul White Gold Eagle

60,306 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 PHYSICS SHOCKWAVE Scientists fed the Fibonacci sequence into a quantum computer… and the system started behaving as if it had an extra direction of time. Not science fiction. Real quantum physics. Researchers used laser pulse patterns based on the Fibonacci sequence to create a strange new phase of matter inside a quantum computer. The result: quantum information survived dramatically longer than expected. Normally, qubits lose coherence quickly. But the Fibonacci-driven system behaved differently. The quasiperiodic pulse structure created a highly stable quantum state that resisted errors far more effectively than ordinary repeating patterns. Researchers described the system as behaving as if it had: “two distinct directions of time.” The deeper shift: The Fibonacci sequence may not just appear in: • shells • galaxies • plants • wave patterns It may also help stabilize quantum reality itself. That is the truly strange part. Because the pattern is ordered… but never exactly repeating. And that non-repeating structure appears to generate new forms of quantum protection. If this scales: • quantum computers may become far more stable • quantum memory systems could improve dramatically • error correction may evolve beyond standard architectures • new phases of matter may emerge from mathematical structures alone The deeper implication: Reality may respond fundamentally differently to patterns that are ordered… without being periodic. Question to audience: If mathematical structures like Fibonacci sequences can stabilize quantum systems… how much of reality is secretly governed by hidden geometric patterns? Follow for more future physics before it hits mainstream. #PhysicsShockwave #QuantumComputing #Fibonacci #TheNewPhysics

TheNewPhysics

38,375 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 AI JUST DISCOVERED QUANTUM EFFECTS THAT SCIENTISTS DIDN'T KNOW EXIST. Researchers at the University of Washington used artificial intelligence to simulate dozens of atomically thin sheets of molybdenum ditelluride stacked in precise twisted patterns. At small scales, these materials look relatively ordinary. But when the AI modeled much larger stacks, completely new quantum behaviors emerged phenomena that only exist because of the complex, repeating moiré patterns formed across many layers. Why this matters: • Many of the most interesting quantum effects only appear at scales that are too large for traditional supercomputers to simulate • AI can act as a fast “surrogate” that learns from smaller calculations and predicts behavior at much bigger scales • These large-scale moiré systems can host exotic quantum states useful for quantum computing and new types of electronics • The same approach could be used to discover many other hidden quantum materials The deeper implication: We are entering an era where AI doesn’t just help us analyze data it helps us discover entirely new quantum phenomena that were previously invisible because they only exist in systems too complex for conventional modeling. This could dramatically speed up the search for materials that power future quantum technologies. What do you find more exciting using AI to uncover hidden quantum effects in materials, or the possibility that these stacked atomic sheets could become building blocks for future quantum computers? Follow for more frontier quantum materials and AI-driven discovery.

TheNewPhysics

29,224 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Ray Dalio is right about one thing: Bitcoin forces you to think harder. But zoom out. 1) “Bitcoin has no privacy.” Bitcoin is pseudonymous, not anonymous. That’s by design. Transparency is what makes it auditable, trust-minimized, and globally verifiable. Privacy isn’t binary — it’s a spectrum. Second-layer solutions like Lightning Network improve transactional privacy, and self-custody + best practices eliminate counterparty surveillance. If your definition of “privacy” is “opaque like the banking system,” then yes — Bitcoin is different. It replaces institutional secrecy with mathematical transparency. 2) “Central banks don’t want to buy Bitcoin.” Correct. Central banks also didn’t want the internet, stablecoins, or gold leaving their vaults. Bitcoin isn’t competing for central bank approval. It’s competing as neutral collateral in a world of weaponized fiat. When sovereign debt hits structural limits, assets without counterparty risk win. That’s why individuals, institutions, ETFs, and even nation-states accumulate it — regardless of central bank preferences. 3) “Quantum computing issues.” If quantum breaks Bitcoin’s cryptography, it breaks the entire global financial system first — SWIFT, online banking, military communications. Bitcoin can upgrade via consensus long before that scenario materializes. Cryptography evolves. That’s not a flaw; that’s software. 4) “Relatively small and controlled market.” Every monetization process starts small. Gold was once a niche commodity. The internet was once “small and controlled.” Bitcoin’s market cap reflects 15 years of monetization — with no CEO, no marketing budget, and no state backing. And “controlled”? Try censoring a decentralized network running across tens of thousands of nodes worldwide. Dalio views Bitcoin through a macro-hedge lens. But Bitcoin isn’t just an asset. It’s: •Programmatic scarcity (21M hard cap) •Final settlement without intermediaries •Borderless value transfer •A hedge against monetary debasement The real question isn’t whether central banks want Bitcoin. It’s whether individuals want money that can’t be inflated, frozen, or diluted. History suggests they do.

Asaf · Satoshi Signal ⚡ @SatoshiSignal

22,503 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten