Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Quantum field theory predicts that light can scatter off light, an effect beyond classical electrodynamics. Maxwells equations are linear such that two photons never interact with each other However, in reality, if you cross two light beams photons will scatter if they're energetic enough. Even in vacuum, the photons...

martinmbauer's profile picture

Martin Bauer

104,073 subscribers

60,227 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

EğitimSağlık & İyilikBilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

FRANK E ELKINS profil fotoğrafı
FRANK E ELKINS2 yıl önce

Einstein said time is an illusion. Ever wonder why? Always wanted a Deeper Knowledge of Science? Wish you could Understand Einstein and Quantum Mechanics without needing a degree in Math or Science? This is the book you’ve been waiting for!

Paul_Gradenwitz profil fotoğrafı
Paul_Gradenwitz1 yıl önce

That doesn't prove that light is photons. It suggests that light is waves on the aether and that there is a maximum energy/amplitude where the medium aether nomore is linear additive like water has a maximum wave hight above where the waves collapse and break.

The_Grate_Gatsby profil fotoğrafı
The_Grate_Gatsby1 yıl önce

Are the photons scattered by virtual electrons/positrons, or by direct interaction with the EM field?

Matter as Machine profil fotoğrafı
Matter as Machine1 yıl önce

That's what really happens in the double slit experiment. Photons are pushed by photons emitted by slit edges and result of interaction is that particles cannot get to specific locations. Something like this:

Almost Sure profil fotoğrafı
Almost Sure1 yıl önce

Presumably, even a single coherent beam of light has some self-scattering probability, but probably orders of magnitude lower. Right?

Aaron profil fotoğrafı
Aaron1 yıl önce

Light-by-light scattering happens because space isn’t empty—it’s woven with a geometric and fractal order. This hidden structure naturally guides and strengthens how photons interact. ✨🔄 Instead of moving randomly, photons follow a self-repeating, structured fabric of space that makes their collisions more likely. 🌌📐 At higher energies or near extreme environments like black holes, this fractal geometry will amplify photon interactions. We could observe more frequent and possibly unexpected scattering effects, revealing the underlying structure of the universe. 🚀💥

howallworks profil fotoğrafı
howallworks1 yıl önce

It is highly doubtful. How were photons isolated from all other particles? For example, neutrinos? I am not even talking about possible quantum gravitons.

howallworks profil fotoğrafı
howallworks1 yıl önce

It is extremely doubtful due to the impossibility of isolation from, for example, neutrinos. Einstein was wrong and the universe is absolute. Experimental data on the lifetime of short-lived particles prove the inequality of inertial reference frames. Article linked below 👇 1/2

Tim Henke (tɪm 'ɦɛŋ.kə) @timhenke.bsky.social profil fotoğrafı
Tim Henke (tɪm 'ɦɛŋ.kə) @timhenke.bsky.social1 yıl önce

Is there an easy explanation for why the energies must be so high? Why do they interact so weakly? Does their scattering go via the exchange of electrons?

Joseph McCard profil fotoğrafı
Joseph McCard1 yıl önce

This illustrates that energy can act within and upon itself. It is energy, creating a dynamic feedback mechanism, of energy acting within and upon itself creating identities, that in turn create the by-product we call consciousness of Self. All energy is conscious. E = C -> mc^2

Benzer Videolar

Thomas Young's double-slit experiment, performed in 1801, is one of the most important demonstrations in physics. It provided strong evidence that light behaves as a wave by producing interference patterns. In the experiment, coherent light is directed at an opaque barrier with two closely spaced slits. The light waves passing through these slits interfere with one another, creating a pattern of bright and dark fringes on a screen positioned behind the slits. The spacing and location of these fringes depend on the light's wavelength, the distance between the two slits, and the distance to the screen. This experiment established the wave nature of light. The modern understanding of wave-particle duality, where light can also behave like particles (photons), developed in the early 20th century with quantum mechanics, and is beautifully illustrated by modern versions of the double-slit experiment performed with individual photons.
0:21

Thomas Young's double-slit experiment, performed in 1801, is one of the most important demonstrations in physics. It provided strong evidence that light behaves as a wave by producing interference patterns. In the experiment, coherent light is directed at an opaque barrier with two closely spaced slits. The light waves passing through these slits interfere with one another, creating a pattern of bright and dark fringes on a screen positioned behind the slits. The spacing and location of these fringes depend on the light's wavelength, the distance between the two slits, and the distance to the screen. This experiment established the wave nature of light. The modern understanding of wave-particle duality, where light can also behave like particles (photons), developed in the early 20th century with quantum mechanics, and is beautifully illustrated by modern versions of the double-slit experiment performed with individual photons.

The Math Flow

13,424 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

The double-slit experiment is a key demonstration in quantum physics that reveals the strange behavior of particles like electrons and photons. In the experiment, particles are fired at a barrier with two slits, and a screen records where they land. If both slits are open and no measurement is made, the particles form an interference pattern, like waves overlapping, even when sent one at a time. This suggests that each particle passes through both slits at once in a state called superposition. However, if detectors are placed at the slits to observe which path the particle takes, the interference pattern disappears. The particles then behave like classical objects, going through one slit or the other. This change in behavior simply from observing the system is known as the observer effect, and it highlights a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics: measurement affects the outcome. The experiment challenges our understanding of reality, showing that at the quantum level, particles don't have definite states until they are observed 🤓
0:24

The double-slit experiment is a key demonstration in quantum physics that reveals the strange behavior of particles like electrons and photons. In the experiment, particles are fired at a barrier with two slits, and a screen records where they land. If both slits are open and no measurement is made, the particles form an interference pattern, like waves overlapping, even when sent one at a time. This suggests that each particle passes through both slits at once in a state called superposition. However, if detectors are placed at the slits to observe which path the particle takes, the interference pattern disappears. The particles then behave like classical objects, going through one slit or the other. This change in behavior simply from observing the system is known as the observer effect, and it highlights a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics: measurement affects the outcome. The experiment challenges our understanding of reality, showing that at the quantum level, particles don't have definite states until they are observed 🤓

𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝚆𝙷𝙸𝚃𝙴 𝚁𝙰𝙱𝙱𝙸𝚃

51,041 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘁𝘂𝗯𝘂𝗹𝗲𝘀: 𝗔 𝗚𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗽𝘀𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗕𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆? Researchers may have just found quantum superpowers in microtubules. Yes, you read that right—quantum *superradiance* in the brain! Superradiance is a phenomenon where excited particles behave like a team, emitting photons collectively in a bright, ultra-fast burst. This is different from normal fluorescence, where photons are emitted slowly and individually. Imagine a synchronized light show on a quantum scale. The key ingredient? Quantum entanglement. If particles are spaced closer than the wavelength of incoming light, they form a collective quantum state. This allows them to act as one entity, amplifying energy release, just like a laser—but smaller in scale. The study zeroed in on tryptophan molecules inside microtubules. When hit with UV light, they emitted much more energy than regular fluorescence could explain—100 times more, to be exact. The researchers believe this can only happen through superradiance, implying large-scale quantum entanglement. If true, this discovery could be huge. It may hint that quantum effects play a bigger role in biology—and even in brain function—than we ever imagined. Could Penrose and the quantum brain theory be right after all? This clip is from "𝗪𝗮𝘀 𝗣𝗲𝗻𝗿𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁? 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗘𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗜𝗻 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻" (PBS Space Time, YouTube, Jul 25, 2024)
2:14

𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘁𝘂𝗯𝘂𝗹𝗲𝘀: 𝗔 𝗚𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗽𝘀𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗕𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆? Researchers may have just found quantum superpowers in microtubules. Yes, you read that right—quantum *superradiance* in the brain! Superradiance is a phenomenon where excited particles behave like a team, emitting photons collectively in a bright, ultra-fast burst. This is different from normal fluorescence, where photons are emitted slowly and individually. Imagine a synchronized light show on a quantum scale. The key ingredient? Quantum entanglement. If particles are spaced closer than the wavelength of incoming light, they form a collective quantum state. This allows them to act as one entity, amplifying energy release, just like a laser—but smaller in scale. The study zeroed in on tryptophan molecules inside microtubules. When hit with UV light, they emitted much more energy than regular fluorescence could explain—100 times more, to be exact. The researchers believe this can only happen through superradiance, implying large-scale quantum entanglement. If true, this discovery could be huge. It may hint that quantum effects play a bigger role in biology—and even in brain function—than we ever imagined. Could Penrose and the quantum brain theory be right after all? This clip is from "𝗪𝗮𝘀 𝗣𝗲𝗻𝗿𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁? 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗘𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗜𝗻 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻" (PBS Space Time, YouTube, Jul 25, 2024)

Ultra Skool 🧠

18,781 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Fritz-Albert Popp was a German biophysicist and one of the godfathers of biophoton research. Dr. Popp published 8 books and over 150 scientific articles spanning theoretical physics, biophotonics, and medicine. In this interview, he makes the striking statement that biochemical reactions can ONLY take place when the molecule undergoing conversion is first stimulated by LIGHT. Virtually all metabolites in the body have absorption spectra. In other words, all metabolites absorb light within a range of wavelengths. For example, the amino acid tryptophan absorbs strongly at 280 nm (UVB light), while melanin absorbs ALL wavelengths of light (including radiowaves, X-rays, and gamma radiation). Some metabolites also have emission spectra, meaning that they not only absorb light but also release light. For example, tryptophan absorbs UVB light, and emits UVA light. Dr. Popp also makes the point that the photons produced by the body have high coherence. Another form of coherent light that everyone is familiar with is LASER light. All living systems produce coherent biophotons which actually facilitate metabolic reactions. Moreover, the ultimate source of ALL photons on the planet is the SUN! Biology uses sunlight to create coherent light on the inside that orchestrates metabolism. Every time you sit down with someone in the flesh, or spend time in Nature, with animals, plants, microbes etc. you are exchanging biophotonic information with your environment and those in it. The digital landscape is, and will forever be, a poor replacement for real life experience largely for this reason. ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆 Nick Jikomes #biophotons #fritzalbertpopp #biophysics #light #sun #lightbiology #biology #medicine #health #metabolism
1:49

Fritz-Albert Popp was a German biophysicist and one of the godfathers of biophoton research. Dr. Popp published 8 books and over 150 scientific articles spanning theoretical physics, biophotonics, and medicine. In this interview, he makes the striking statement that biochemical reactions can ONLY take place when the molecule undergoing conversion is first stimulated by LIGHT. Virtually all metabolites in the body have absorption spectra. In other words, all metabolites absorb light within a range of wavelengths. For example, the amino acid tryptophan absorbs strongly at 280 nm (UVB light), while melanin absorbs ALL wavelengths of light (including radiowaves, X-rays, and gamma radiation). Some metabolites also have emission spectra, meaning that they not only absorb light but also release light. For example, tryptophan absorbs UVB light, and emits UVA light. Dr. Popp also makes the point that the photons produced by the body have high coherence. Another form of coherent light that everyone is familiar with is LASER light. All living systems produce coherent biophotons which actually facilitate metabolic reactions. Moreover, the ultimate source of ALL photons on the planet is the SUN! Biology uses sunlight to create coherent light on the inside that orchestrates metabolism. Every time you sit down with someone in the flesh, or spend time in Nature, with animals, plants, microbes etc. you are exchanging biophotonic information with your environment and those in it. The digital landscape is, and will forever be, a poor replacement for real life experience largely for this reason. ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆 Nick Jikomes #biophotons #fritzalbertpopp #biophysics #light #sun #lightbiology #biology #medicine #health #metabolism

Dr. Alexis Jazmyn

19,887 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Evaluating Neural Networks at the Speed of Light (with Light!). See live optical inference in the video below. Excited to share recent academic work on optical neural networks as a collection of computing elements embedded in the camera lens! These elements perform computation optically even before an image is captured, using the photons in the scene instead of GPU computation after the capture. We were able to achieve ImageNet classification more than two orders of magnitude faster than conventional neural networks on today's GPUs at almost no power consumption! To do this, we developed an array of metalenses that perform this computation on light from the scene. Project: Paper: Amazing collaboration with Kaixuan Wei, Xiao Li, Johannes Froech, Praneeth Chakravarthula, James Whitehead, Ethan Tseng , Arka Majumdar .
0:45

Evaluating Neural Networks at the Speed of Light (with Light!). See live optical inference in the video below. Excited to share recent academic work on optical neural networks as a collection of computing elements embedded in the camera lens! These elements perform computation optically even before an image is captured, using the photons in the scene instead of GPU computation after the capture. We were able to achieve ImageNet classification more than two orders of magnitude faster than conventional neural networks on today's GPUs at almost no power consumption! To do this, we developed an array of metalenses that perform this computation on light from the scene. Project: Paper: Amazing collaboration with Kaixuan Wei, Xiao Li, Johannes Froech, Praneeth Chakravarthula, James Whitehead, Ethan Tseng , Arka Majumdar .

Felix Heide

29,895 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Universities teach many erroneous models. One example of a misleading teaching is the Newtonian model of the prism. A man named Johann Goethe corrected and complimented Newton's model about 100 years after Newton. It is not the same light passing through the prism and distributing. It is a brand-new light with each beam of color. The primary light hitting the prism is extinguished by the electrons making up the glass of the prism itself. Those same electrons re-emit a brand new light from each angle. That process happens at the rate of c. Serving the illusion that the original white light came it... separated and exited to continue on. Most people rely on outdated text books or the Pink Floyd album cover "Dark Side of the Moon" to get their information about light and color and prisms. The depictions of light "splitting" and "bending" through a prism based on their color is false. (See first comments for attached images and substantiation) I filmed these videos playing around with prisms, lasers, magnifying glasses, mirrors, slits, and colored filters. I've gained my own perspectives on light and color over the years from real world, hands-on experimentation and observation. Most people have never held a real glass prism their own hands and done the tests to see for themselves. 2 prisms for $10 Harmonics of Light and Sound: This guy said his units were confiscated by the FBI and he was threatened not to pursue manufacturing them. The unit is simply a light with a magnifying glass and colored filters to isolate the light. Like burning an ant with a focal point... but with a specific color. The lens can spin and create a stroboscopic effect in an isolated band. The inventor claimed it healed stuff. Dinshah Spectro-Chrome Machine - Tour and Explanation Magenta monochromatic ray of shadow - Pehr Sahlstrom: Color and Physics, Newton versus Goethe - Pehr Sahlstrom: Thomas Joseph Brown Color Theory: Clay Taylor Color Theory: Testing the "Rightness" of relativity. The impossibility of proving something through experiments. Laser and Mirror observation: It's never the same light. Re-emission Example: I put this interactive page together going back and forth with ChatGPT to code using Javascript. Here is a video playing with the slide controls to show 3 different sinewaves (3 different lights/emissions). The packets are ALWAYS in phase from medium to medium. The frequency shifts BECAUSE the velocity of light shifts. NOT a Doppler shift of "the same light" distorting within the same frame of reference. It's a brand new light at each point. The incoming light is a different frame of reference. All the light you ever see is the re-emitted light from the electrons making up yourself. Propagation and Re-Emission of Light: Dr. Edward Dowdye Slides - LOTS of math and context. E.H. Dowdye, Can Stars BEND LIGHT? General Relativity and Gravity with Dr. Edward Dowdye Challenges to Gravitational Lensing and More: 71 Part Video Series (Each vid is 1 min - 1 and a hafl min) The Rebirth of Classical Physics - Time, Light & Gravity Classical Physics vs Relativity - History, Examples and Alternatives: Illusions of Relativity: Space-Time vs Real-Time The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity - Article Packed with Info & Links Thought Experiment for Light and Absolute Time. (This scenario got me banned from talking on a Podcast.) "Too off the rails."
22:27

Universities teach many erroneous models. One example of a misleading teaching is the Newtonian model of the prism. A man named Johann Goethe corrected and complimented Newton's model about 100 years after Newton. It is not the same light passing through the prism and distributing. It is a brand-new light with each beam of color. The primary light hitting the prism is extinguished by the electrons making up the glass of the prism itself. Those same electrons re-emit a brand new light from each angle. That process happens at the rate of c. Serving the illusion that the original white light came it... separated and exited to continue on. Most people rely on outdated text books or the Pink Floyd album cover "Dark Side of the Moon" to get their information about light and color and prisms. The depictions of light "splitting" and "bending" through a prism based on their color is false. (See first comments for attached images and substantiation) I filmed these videos playing around with prisms, lasers, magnifying glasses, mirrors, slits, and colored filters. I've gained my own perspectives on light and color over the years from real world, hands-on experimentation and observation. Most people have never held a real glass prism their own hands and done the tests to see for themselves. 2 prisms for $10 Harmonics of Light and Sound: This guy said his units were confiscated by the FBI and he was threatened not to pursue manufacturing them. The unit is simply a light with a magnifying glass and colored filters to isolate the light. Like burning an ant with a focal point... but with a specific color. The lens can spin and create a stroboscopic effect in an isolated band. The inventor claimed it healed stuff. Dinshah Spectro-Chrome Machine - Tour and Explanation Magenta monochromatic ray of shadow - Pehr Sahlstrom: Color and Physics, Newton versus Goethe - Pehr Sahlstrom: Thomas Joseph Brown Color Theory: Clay Taylor Color Theory: Testing the "Rightness" of relativity. The impossibility of proving something through experiments. Laser and Mirror observation: It's never the same light. Re-emission Example: I put this interactive page together going back and forth with ChatGPT to code using Javascript. Here is a video playing with the slide controls to show 3 different sinewaves (3 different lights/emissions). The packets are ALWAYS in phase from medium to medium. The frequency shifts BECAUSE the velocity of light shifts. NOT a Doppler shift of "the same light" distorting within the same frame of reference. It's a brand new light at each point. The incoming light is a different frame of reference. All the light you ever see is the re-emitted light from the electrons making up yourself. Propagation and Re-Emission of Light: Dr. Edward Dowdye Slides - LOTS of math and context. E.H. Dowdye, Can Stars BEND LIGHT? General Relativity and Gravity with Dr. Edward Dowdye Challenges to Gravitational Lensing and More: 71 Part Video Series (Each vid is 1 min - 1 and a hafl min) The Rebirth of Classical Physics - Time, Light & Gravity Classical Physics vs Relativity - History, Examples and Alternatives: Illusions of Relativity: Space-Time vs Real-Time The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity - Article Packed with Info & Links Thought Experiment for Light and Absolute Time. (This scenario got me banned from talking on a Podcast.) "Too off the rails."

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

44,361 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

#AYA - "This is a beautiful Fairy. When they are seen as light, it is the visual of changing densities. At times there will be many tiny orbs and other times there is a large area of pulsating Light. The area surrounding each Fairy is a high frequency energy field. This is moving constantly and has a very soft ethereal look. Fairies have appendages as wings but these are not necessary in flight. Fairies move and live in all densities and dimensions. They are higher beings that were created in Elohim to serve all life."
1:04

#AYA - "This is a beautiful Fairy. When they are seen as light, it is the visual of changing densities. At times there will be many tiny orbs and other times there is a large area of pulsating Light. The area surrounding each Fairy is a high frequency energy field. This is moving constantly and has a very soft ethereal look. Fairies have appendages as wings but these are not necessary in flight. Fairies move and live in all densities and dimensions. They are higher beings that were created in Elohim to serve all life."

Kab

61,745 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

THE SUN US OUR FOOD The Sun is Electric and the Earth is Magnetic. We are Electromagnetic beings. Learn how to operate in this realm. The fundamental truth is that you are the light you are seeking. You are already enlightened, as your biological reality is that you are a being of light, down to your DNA, your cells, and the trillions of biophotons that permeate your entire being. Even your bones, the densest part of your physical being, are piezoelectric crystalline structures that make electricity (light) when they are compressed. And this light that powers you is the same light that powers the Sun and the Stars, the lightning and the lightning bugs, and the Cosmos in its entirety. We are electromagnetic beings bathed in an electrically connected reality. You are vast. You contain multitudes. What has been obstructing that knowing and being is just a story; distorted waves in space that can be tuned back to their underlying harmonious perfection. Beneath the noise in the signal and stories of victimhood and struggle, you are simply one with the Unified Field, the Cosmos Itself - YOU are the UNIVERSE. And from that perspective everything is possible. ✨🙌🏾💫 © The Path to Enlightenment
1:22

THE SUN US OUR FOOD The Sun is Electric and the Earth is Magnetic. We are Electromagnetic beings. Learn how to operate in this realm. The fundamental truth is that you are the light you are seeking. You are already enlightened, as your biological reality is that you are a being of light, down to your DNA, your cells, and the trillions of biophotons that permeate your entire being. Even your bones, the densest part of your physical being, are piezoelectric crystalline structures that make electricity (light) when they are compressed. And this light that powers you is the same light that powers the Sun and the Stars, the lightning and the lightning bugs, and the Cosmos in its entirety. We are electromagnetic beings bathed in an electrically connected reality. You are vast. You contain multitudes. What has been obstructing that knowing and being is just a story; distorted waves in space that can be tuned back to their underlying harmonious perfection. Beneath the noise in the signal and stories of victimhood and struggle, you are simply one with the Unified Field, the Cosmos Itself - YOU are the UNIVERSE. And from that perspective everything is possible. ✨🙌🏾💫 © The Path to Enlightenment

🧬Maxpein🧬

100,247 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Thought experiment for people regarding the concept of Absolute Time. Absolute means NO EXCEPTIONS. We are NOT looking back in time when we see galaxies and stars. We are NOT looking back in time 1.25 seconds when we see the moon. We're Not looking back in time 3 minutes when we see Mars. We're Not looking back in time 8.33 minutes when we see the Sun. If an astronaut lit a matchstick on Mars, the distant observer would see predator heat waves at the top of the matchstick in real-time while the matchstick started to blacken towards the astronaut's fingers. But there would be no orange light from that chemical reaction or flame seen. If the matchstick burnt out before the packet of orange light from that particular chemical reaction made it to Earth… then the distant observer would just see a disembodied orange flash of light with a lag. But the Earth-bound observer would never actually see the flame associated with the orange wavelength it put out. The wavelength of color emitted by the flame is not a recording of reality. If the orange light is 650 Thz, that means there are 650 trillion individual and separate bursts of orange light pulsating in 1 second. NOT that "the same light" is "waving" 650 trillion times a second and that light is a recording of reality. There are 650 trillion brand-new lights flashing in 1 second. Each Hertz is a brand-new emission and packet unto itself. Time does not re-emit 650 trillion times a second, nor is a photon a particle or a packet of reality acting like the frame of a reel of footage. The orange light that already left the flame will continue to propagate out until it meets the electrons making up the distant observer. But remember, it is never the same light within that packet. And the electrons making up the observer will absorb all of those different lights within that packet and re-emit brand-new lights that produce the product of illumination. A photon is a massless packet of energy, spherically expanding at the rate of c from the source it comes from. Illumination is the result of that energy being absorbed and RE-emitted by any other electrons that did not output that primary packet. But time is not associated with the same light. It's never the same light and time does not re-emit between packets. Time is not relative. Do NOT allow your mind Carte Blanche to think along the lines of relative time. DROP IT for this thought experiment. We are thinking along the lines of ABSOLUTE TIME/ Galilean VARIANCE. What does absolute time mean? It means time is constant in ALL frames of reference. Any frequency shifts between atomic clocks IS a literal change in the speed of light. But relativity forbids the speed of light from Ever changing, so relativity (Lorentz INVARIANCE) invented the concept of the 4th dimension and space-time. Because Relativity doesn't allow light speed to shift.. they interpret the same frequency shift between atomic clocks as being conclusive, irrefutable evidence that time and reality itself shifts. Rather than say it's just that ONE clock being affected by Earth's gravity and the oscillation of that ONE cesium clock is being altered compared to other clocks. People don't realize that in relativity... time dilation is SYMMETRICAL! Not even most relativists know their own theory. If Clock A and Clock B are synchronized and together... and then they accelerate apart... Einstein said Clock A would see Clock B as being slower itself. And Clock B would view Clock A as slower than ITself. NOT that only one observer would see back in time and the other would see forward or not at all. No... BOTH observers are supposed to see each other BACK in time relative to each other according to Einstein and the consequence of the math. It doesn't make ANY sense!! But relativists toss that part of time dilation under their 4th dimensional rug. The rug is woven from threads of gold that only the smart people can see apparently. So... here's a thought experiment/ Gedankenexperiment for absolute time. NO paradoxes... no nonsense or confusion. What do you see in a club? You see disco lights changing and a color wheel effect. You see everyone in REAL-TIME. Not just because they are so close to the lights. Light is not a recording of reality. Light is simply color. Illuminating reality in a certain color. Just because you can't see something yet or the color hasn't reached you doesn't mean it isn't happening in real-time. Zoom out and look at the people in the club through binoculars a mile away. You are still looking at them in real-time. The colors are shifting with a delay in the club. Now look at the club through a telescope from the surface of the moon. You're still looking at the people in real-time. But now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 1.25 seconds because it takes light 1.25 seconds to travel from the Earth to the moon. Now look at the club through an even bigger telescope from the surface of Mars. You're still looking at the people in real-time, but now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 3 minutes because it takes light 3 minutes to travel from Earth to Mars. fr you are a third hypothetical observer zoomed out and watching the person from Mars AND seeing the club on Earth... you're still seeing everything happening in real-time as well. But you see the colored wavepackets traveling with a delay to the observer on Mars. And the disco color wheel effect is just lagging before it affects the observer from Mars and the observer on the Moon. It doesn't matter how far you zoom out! There is only now to observe. But there WILL be a lag and delay for a given color/wavepacket to reach distant observers. But all points in space are already illuminated by other starlight. So if you're too far away... you'll just see the club in real-time but without any disco lights. Just see them in white light because that's the source already illuminating the scene. This is where it gets the most difficult because people think light itself is a recording of reality that replays a scene from where it came from. But another punch in the gut of relativity is that in order to see REFLECTED light... that would require a TWO-WAY transit. Which means the light would have to be sent out... record the scene of a distant event and then RETURN in order to REplay the event. Which means it would take 6 minutes to see the club from Mars by that logic and 2.5 seconds to see the club from the moon by that logic. The difference in tick rates between clocks has NOTHING to do with time dilation. Wait.. what?! How can that be? Because a clock itself doesn't represent all of time and reality. The difference between clocks is a "Transverse relative time shift." If the only light in the universe was from the lighter… the only way a distant observer would be able to see the astronaut on Mars is if the astronaut held down the button of the lighter for longer than 3 minutes. It takes 3 minutes for the packet of light to travel from Mars to Earth. The distant observer would never be able to see Mars, unless the light stretched from Mars all the way to Earth, and illuminated the path between Mars and Earth. And that would take 3 minutes for the boundary and first part of that wave packet to reach Earth. But if the distant observer wanted to observe Mars in real-time… then that packet of light would have to be on for longer than 3 minutes. So if the astronaut on Mars flicked the lighter at 12:00, the distant observer on Earth wouldn't see anything until 12:03. If the light was on for 3 minutes and 10 seconds, and the distant observer is 3 light minutes away... the distant observer would be able to see Mars in real-time for 10 seconds starting at 12:03. In the 20 second video clip of the rotating planet with shifting colors... just imagine you're a couple light minutes or light seconds away. You're still seeing the planet spin in real-time. But there is simply a delay of switching colors. You are Not looking back in time. It's just a color wheel effect from a great distance away. That's it!! There are many major flaws which tarnish people's critical thinking on this thought experiment. 1. Light does NOT ricochet or bounce. Electrons absorb, emit and re-emit ALL electromagnetic radiation. The electrons, making up the glass of a mirror will absorb the incoming light and re-emit a brand-new light as an equal and opposite reaction. NOT that "the same light" bounced off the mirror and continued on within the same frame of reference.  2. Light is NOT a recording of reality. 3. It is NOT the same light being observed from a source. It's never the same light. Each Hertz is a new light. Think of half of a sine wave as being its own emission. On an oscilloscope, a stimulus generates a peak which initiates an equal and opposite trough. Or vice versa. That repeating process is not "the same light." If you cut and paste that sine wave to another sine wave, the boundary between the waves will always be in phase. (thus refraction) 4. The speed of light is NOT the same in ALL frames of reference, no matter what. 5. Light is NOT made of particles and waves that flip back-and-forth. 6. Time is NOT connected to the speed of light. Time remains constant regardless if you accelerate towards or away from a clock. The clocks themselves will indeed be off! But that's an affect on the electrons making up the atomic clock affecting the oscillation of the isotope which is ASSUMED to ALWAYS be the same. So ANY difference in oscillation is treated as a literal distortion in space-time. 7. Space and time are not linked at all. That is a mathematical artifice under Lorentz invariance. Time is relative under Lorentz invariance. But time is absolute under Galilean VARIANCE. When people hear or see the word GALILEAN... their brains switch to auto pilot to "aether theory" and "classical physics." What people don't realize is that aether theory used Galilean INVARIANCE. Rather than space-time being used as an excuse to explain the difference in frequencies between atomic clocks... it was originally aether being used as an excuse to keep the speed of light the same. But None of those things are valid! We are thinking under the framework of Galilean VARIANCE! Completely new revolutionary model returning to Isaac Newton and Classical physics but without the corpuscular theory (particle) theory for light... without a particle-wave duality... without an aether... without a 4th dimension. Just good ol elementary math within 3D Euclidean space. Everything happening in real-time, right now. This reformulation of Galilean transformations was offered by Dr. Edward Dowdye in 1991 called The Extinction Shift Principle. Effectivity as opposed to Relativity. If light required a two-way transit, in order to travel out… Record an event, and travel back to replay the recording…  then it would take 6 minutes to see the astronaut on Mars instead of 3.  Remember… They say the SAME light is a recording, and must travel there and travel back in order to REplay. Relativity says time is relative: t' ≠ t time is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and t = tₒ / √1 - v²/c² but Galilean Variance says time is not relative: t' = t (Time IS the same from all frames of reference) and τ_tr = τₒ / √1 - v²/c² Relativity says c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference) but Galilean variance says c' ≠ c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and that c' = c ± v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer) Relativity says E = mc² (Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.) but Galilean variance says E = Δmc² = mₒc² (Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mₒ represents the original mass. Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.) The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Star light and illumination: Flicking a Lighter on Mars visual example:
0:21

Thought experiment for people regarding the concept of Absolute Time. Absolute means NO EXCEPTIONS. We are NOT looking back in time when we see galaxies and stars. We are NOT looking back in time 1.25 seconds when we see the moon. We're Not looking back in time 3 minutes when we see Mars. We're Not looking back in time 8.33 minutes when we see the Sun. If an astronaut lit a matchstick on Mars, the distant observer would see predator heat waves at the top of the matchstick in real-time while the matchstick started to blacken towards the astronaut's fingers. But there would be no orange light from that chemical reaction or flame seen. If the matchstick burnt out before the packet of orange light from that particular chemical reaction made it to Earth… then the distant observer would just see a disembodied orange flash of light with a lag. But the Earth-bound observer would never actually see the flame associated with the orange wavelength it put out. The wavelength of color emitted by the flame is not a recording of reality. If the orange light is 650 Thz, that means there are 650 trillion individual and separate bursts of orange light pulsating in 1 second. NOT that "the same light" is "waving" 650 trillion times a second and that light is a recording of reality. There are 650 trillion brand-new lights flashing in 1 second. Each Hertz is a brand-new emission and packet unto itself. Time does not re-emit 650 trillion times a second, nor is a photon a particle or a packet of reality acting like the frame of a reel of footage. The orange light that already left the flame will continue to propagate out until it meets the electrons making up the distant observer. But remember, it is never the same light within that packet. And the electrons making up the observer will absorb all of those different lights within that packet and re-emit brand-new lights that produce the product of illumination. A photon is a massless packet of energy, spherically expanding at the rate of c from the source it comes from. Illumination is the result of that energy being absorbed and RE-emitted by any other electrons that did not output that primary packet. But time is not associated with the same light. It's never the same light and time does not re-emit between packets. Time is not relative. Do NOT allow your mind Carte Blanche to think along the lines of relative time. DROP IT for this thought experiment. We are thinking along the lines of ABSOLUTE TIME/ Galilean VARIANCE. What does absolute time mean? It means time is constant in ALL frames of reference. Any frequency shifts between atomic clocks IS a literal change in the speed of light. But relativity forbids the speed of light from Ever changing, so relativity (Lorentz INVARIANCE) invented the concept of the 4th dimension and space-time. Because Relativity doesn't allow light speed to shift.. they interpret the same frequency shift between atomic clocks as being conclusive, irrefutable evidence that time and reality itself shifts. Rather than say it's just that ONE clock being affected by Earth's gravity and the oscillation of that ONE cesium clock is being altered compared to other clocks. People don't realize that in relativity... time dilation is SYMMETRICAL! Not even most relativists know their own theory. If Clock A and Clock B are synchronized and together... and then they accelerate apart... Einstein said Clock A would see Clock B as being slower itself. And Clock B would view Clock A as slower than ITself. NOT that only one observer would see back in time and the other would see forward or not at all. No... BOTH observers are supposed to see each other BACK in time relative to each other according to Einstein and the consequence of the math. It doesn't make ANY sense!! But relativists toss that part of time dilation under their 4th dimensional rug. The rug is woven from threads of gold that only the smart people can see apparently. So... here's a thought experiment/ Gedankenexperiment for absolute time. NO paradoxes... no nonsense or confusion. What do you see in a club? You see disco lights changing and a color wheel effect. You see everyone in REAL-TIME. Not just because they are so close to the lights. Light is not a recording of reality. Light is simply color. Illuminating reality in a certain color. Just because you can't see something yet or the color hasn't reached you doesn't mean it isn't happening in real-time. Zoom out and look at the people in the club through binoculars a mile away. You are still looking at them in real-time. The colors are shifting with a delay in the club. Now look at the club through a telescope from the surface of the moon. You're still looking at the people in real-time. But now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 1.25 seconds because it takes light 1.25 seconds to travel from the Earth to the moon. Now look at the club through an even bigger telescope from the surface of Mars. You're still looking at the people in real-time, but now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 3 minutes because it takes light 3 minutes to travel from Earth to Mars. fr you are a third hypothetical observer zoomed out and watching the person from Mars AND seeing the club on Earth... you're still seeing everything happening in real-time as well. But you see the colored wavepackets traveling with a delay to the observer on Mars. And the disco color wheel effect is just lagging before it affects the observer from Mars and the observer on the Moon. It doesn't matter how far you zoom out! There is only now to observe. But there WILL be a lag and delay for a given color/wavepacket to reach distant observers. But all points in space are already illuminated by other starlight. So if you're too far away... you'll just see the club in real-time but without any disco lights. Just see them in white light because that's the source already illuminating the scene. This is where it gets the most difficult because people think light itself is a recording of reality that replays a scene from where it came from. But another punch in the gut of relativity is that in order to see REFLECTED light... that would require a TWO-WAY transit. Which means the light would have to be sent out... record the scene of a distant event and then RETURN in order to REplay the event. Which means it would take 6 minutes to see the club from Mars by that logic and 2.5 seconds to see the club from the moon by that logic. The difference in tick rates between clocks has NOTHING to do with time dilation. Wait.. what?! How can that be? Because a clock itself doesn't represent all of time and reality. The difference between clocks is a "Transverse relative time shift." If the only light in the universe was from the lighter… the only way a distant observer would be able to see the astronaut on Mars is if the astronaut held down the button of the lighter for longer than 3 minutes. It takes 3 minutes for the packet of light to travel from Mars to Earth. The distant observer would never be able to see Mars, unless the light stretched from Mars all the way to Earth, and illuminated the path between Mars and Earth. And that would take 3 minutes for the boundary and first part of that wave packet to reach Earth. But if the distant observer wanted to observe Mars in real-time… then that packet of light would have to be on for longer than 3 minutes. So if the astronaut on Mars flicked the lighter at 12:00, the distant observer on Earth wouldn't see anything until 12:03. If the light was on for 3 minutes and 10 seconds, and the distant observer is 3 light minutes away... the distant observer would be able to see Mars in real-time for 10 seconds starting at 12:03. In the 20 second video clip of the rotating planet with shifting colors... just imagine you're a couple light minutes or light seconds away. You're still seeing the planet spin in real-time. But there is simply a delay of switching colors. You are Not looking back in time. It's just a color wheel effect from a great distance away. That's it!! There are many major flaws which tarnish people's critical thinking on this thought experiment. 1. Light does NOT ricochet or bounce. Electrons absorb, emit and re-emit ALL electromagnetic radiation. The electrons, making up the glass of a mirror will absorb the incoming light and re-emit a brand-new light as an equal and opposite reaction. NOT that "the same light" bounced off the mirror and continued on within the same frame of reference.  2. Light is NOT a recording of reality. 3. It is NOT the same light being observed from a source. It's never the same light. Each Hertz is a new light. Think of half of a sine wave as being its own emission. On an oscilloscope, a stimulus generates a peak which initiates an equal and opposite trough. Or vice versa. That repeating process is not "the same light." If you cut and paste that sine wave to another sine wave, the boundary between the waves will always be in phase. (thus refraction) 4. The speed of light is NOT the same in ALL frames of reference, no matter what. 5. Light is NOT made of particles and waves that flip back-and-forth. 6. Time is NOT connected to the speed of light. Time remains constant regardless if you accelerate towards or away from a clock. The clocks themselves will indeed be off! But that's an affect on the electrons making up the atomic clock affecting the oscillation of the isotope which is ASSUMED to ALWAYS be the same. So ANY difference in oscillation is treated as a literal distortion in space-time. 7. Space and time are not linked at all. That is a mathematical artifice under Lorentz invariance. Time is relative under Lorentz invariance. But time is absolute under Galilean VARIANCE. When people hear or see the word GALILEAN... their brains switch to auto pilot to "aether theory" and "classical physics." What people don't realize is that aether theory used Galilean INVARIANCE. Rather than space-time being used as an excuse to explain the difference in frequencies between atomic clocks... it was originally aether being used as an excuse to keep the speed of light the same. But None of those things are valid! We are thinking under the framework of Galilean VARIANCE! Completely new revolutionary model returning to Isaac Newton and Classical physics but without the corpuscular theory (particle) theory for light... without a particle-wave duality... without an aether... without a 4th dimension. Just good ol elementary math within 3D Euclidean space. Everything happening in real-time, right now. This reformulation of Galilean transformations was offered by Dr. Edward Dowdye in 1991 called The Extinction Shift Principle. Effectivity as opposed to Relativity. If light required a two-way transit, in order to travel out… Record an event, and travel back to replay the recording…  then it would take 6 minutes to see the astronaut on Mars instead of 3.  Remember… They say the SAME light is a recording, and must travel there and travel back in order to REplay. Relativity says time is relative: t' ≠ t time is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and t = tₒ / √1 - v²/c² but Galilean Variance says time is not relative: t' = t (Time IS the same from all frames of reference) and τ_tr = τₒ / √1 - v²/c² Relativity says c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference) but Galilean variance says c' ≠ c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and that c' = c ± v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer) Relativity says E = mc² (Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.) but Galilean variance says E = Δmc² = mₒc² (Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mₒ represents the original mass. Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.) The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Star light and illumination: Flicking a Lighter on Mars visual example:

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

16,608 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Physicist Avi Loeb just told me that futuristic technology could enable humanity to travel “faster than the speed of light.” But we would have to move beyond the three dimensions we are familiar with. And he speculated that advanced alien civilizations could already have access to these dimensions. You need to hear his fascinating theory: “Think about living on the surface of a balloon.” “That is two dimensional.” “You might not be aware that there is a third dimension because you are just living on the surface of that balloon.” “If there is another being that is capable of taking advantage of the third dimension, then that being will cross the distance between two points on the surface of the balloon faster than you can imagine.” “Because the travel between the two points can go through the third dimension that connects the two points—not necessarily on the curved surface of the balloon.” “So there are, in principle, possibilities of navigating in more than the dimensions that we are familiar with.” “We are familiar with three spatial dimensions plus time.” “If there are more than three and there is a technological way of taking advantage of those … objects will appear and disappear in ways that we cannot understand.” “Einstein’s theory of relativity states that no material object can move faster than light.” “However, if there are extra dimensions, you might actually travel faster than light in the three dimensions, even though you’re traveling less than the speed of light in the extra dimensions.”
3:09

Physicist Avi Loeb just told me that futuristic technology could enable humanity to travel “faster than the speed of light.” But we would have to move beyond the three dimensions we are familiar with. And he speculated that advanced alien civilizations could already have access to these dimensions. You need to hear his fascinating theory: “Think about living on the surface of a balloon.” “That is two dimensional.” “You might not be aware that there is a third dimension because you are just living on the surface of that balloon.” “If there is another being that is capable of taking advantage of the third dimension, then that being will cross the distance between two points on the surface of the balloon faster than you can imagine.” “Because the travel between the two points can go through the third dimension that connects the two points—not necessarily on the curved surface of the balloon.” “So there are, in principle, possibilities of navigating in more than the dimensions that we are familiar with.” “We are familiar with three spatial dimensions plus time.” “If there are more than three and there is a technological way of taking advantage of those … objects will appear and disappear in ways that we cannot understand.” “Einstein’s theory of relativity states that no material object can move faster than light.” “However, if there are extra dimensions, you might actually travel faster than light in the three dimensions, even though you’re traveling less than the speed of light in the extra dimensions.”

Jan Jekielek

31,984 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Pope Leo XIV sends a heart felt video message to young Catholics in Iraq: “It is not always easy to be a light in the world. Indeed, at the present time, you are called to radiate this light in a situation that has often been marked by war and instability. The Lord has placed great trust in you in bestowing upon you this mission, and I too have great confidence in all of you. You must be Christ’s light in the midst of a darkness that can, at times, seem overwhelming. Do not be afraid! And do not think that you are alone in this task. I am with you; the Church is with you. Place your trust in Jesus; listen to him in prayer and through the guidance of others, and allow him to lead you.”
6:06

Pope Leo XIV sends a heart felt video message to young Catholics in Iraq: “It is not always easy to be a light in the world. Indeed, at the present time, you are called to radiate this light in a situation that has often been marked by war and instability. The Lord has placed great trust in you in bestowing upon you this mission, and I too have great confidence in all of you. You must be Christ’s light in the midst of a darkness that can, at times, seem overwhelming. Do not be afraid! And do not think that you are alone in this task. I am with you; the Church is with you. Place your trust in Jesus; listen to him in prayer and through the guidance of others, and allow him to lead you.”

Catholic Sat

22,888 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

Here we have the 𝘊𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘨𝘰𝘶 𝘔𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴 observed from over 𝟏𝟔𝟎 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐬 away at an observer height of 𝟏,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐭. The 𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐭 peak in the range stands at 𝟗,𝟏𝟑𝟔 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐭. According to the globe earth model, these mountains should be hidden behind over 𝟗,𝟗𝟔𝟖 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐭 of curvature. In fact, this observation happens predictably 2 times a year: February 8th & November 2nd. Now, here's the crucial part: In the video, you’ll notice that at the beginning, the mountains aren’t visible. This isn’t because they’re hidden behind the supposed curve of the Earth—because as the timelapse continues, and the sun begins to set behind them, the mountains appear. This alone debunks claims such as “if the Earth were flat, you’d see the mountains every day” or “you can’t see the mountains because of the Earth’s curvature” or even the classic, “if the Earth were flat, I should be able to see Mt. Everest from New York.” These arguments are not only wrong, they reflect a lack of understanding. Light attenuates—meaning the atmosphere absorbs light as it travels. Eventually, the distant mountains fade from view because the light they reflect is absorbed by the air. The light from the sun, however, is far more intense, and can make it through the atmosphere to the observer. When the mountains are backlit by the sun’s more intense light, they become visible once again. Even if you cling to the idea that these mountains are hidden behind nearly 𝟏𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐭 of curvature, you’d have to accept the fact the mountains are not initially visible due to light attenuation, not earth curvature. If you showed the first moments of this timelapse to someone who believes in the globe model, they’d likely claim it proves the Earth’s curvature because the mountains seem hidden. But as you’ll see moments later, that’s objectively false. If you continue to push that narrative after seeing the full timelapse, you’re not just uninformed—you’re being deliberately dishonest.
0:32

Here we have the 𝘊𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘨𝘰𝘶 𝘔𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴 observed from over 𝟏𝟔𝟎 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐬 away at an observer height of 𝟏,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐭. The 𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐭 peak in the range stands at 𝟗,𝟏𝟑𝟔 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐭. According to the globe earth model, these mountains should be hidden behind over 𝟗,𝟗𝟔𝟖 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐭 of curvature. In fact, this observation happens predictably 2 times a year: February 8th & November 2nd. Now, here's the crucial part: In the video, you’ll notice that at the beginning, the mountains aren’t visible. This isn’t because they’re hidden behind the supposed curve of the Earth—because as the timelapse continues, and the sun begins to set behind them, the mountains appear. This alone debunks claims such as “if the Earth were flat, you’d see the mountains every day” or “you can’t see the mountains because of the Earth’s curvature” or even the classic, “if the Earth were flat, I should be able to see Mt. Everest from New York.” These arguments are not only wrong, they reflect a lack of understanding. Light attenuates—meaning the atmosphere absorbs light as it travels. Eventually, the distant mountains fade from view because the light they reflect is absorbed by the air. The light from the sun, however, is far more intense, and can make it through the atmosphere to the observer. When the mountains are backlit by the sun’s more intense light, they become visible once again. Even if you cling to the idea that these mountains are hidden behind nearly 𝟏𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐭 of curvature, you’d have to accept the fact the mountains are not initially visible due to light attenuation, not earth curvature. If you showed the first moments of this timelapse to someone who believes in the globe model, they’d likely claim it proves the Earth’s curvature because the mountains seem hidden. But as you’ll see moments later, that’s objectively false. If you continue to push that narrative after seeing the full timelapse, you’re not just uninformed—you’re being deliberately dishonest.

Witsit

43,758 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Dr. Andrew Huberman just confirmed a “wild conspiracy theory” about incandescent lights and LED bulbs. The long wavelengths found in incandescents increase your metabolism and “charge your mitochondria.” Conversely, the LED bulbs that most of you have in your house are “causing disruptions in mitochondrial function.” DR. ANDREW HUBERMAN: “Your mitochondria function better, you increase ATP production, your metabolism increases in the presence of red light, long wavelength light to the skin.” “Shine long wavelength light on somebody, watch blood glucose levels in a blood glucose test, and it’s blunted.” “Now, the LED lights that are commonly used now… that short wavelength light, in the absence of long wavelength light, has been shown to damage the mitochondria.” “This used to be considered crazy. This was like chemtrail crazy, right?” “But now we’re starting to see from animal studies and human studies, from Glenn Jeffreys and others, that people’s vision gets better when they get in front of an incandescent bulb once a day.” “If they get sunlight, which also has long-wavelength light, your vision improves because of improvements in mitochondria.” The Biden administration quietly pushed incandescents out of the market through aggressive energy regulations. But you can still find them online today if you look hard enough. If that health insight stood out to you, there’s a lot more where that came from. (See post below) This page finds the moments they don’t want going viral, with captions that tell you exactly why they matter before you even hit play. See why 2 million already follow: The Vigilant Fox 🦊
2:15

Dr. Andrew Huberman just confirmed a “wild conspiracy theory” about incandescent lights and LED bulbs. The long wavelengths found in incandescents increase your metabolism and “charge your mitochondria.” Conversely, the LED bulbs that most of you have in your house are “causing disruptions in mitochondrial function.” DR. ANDREW HUBERMAN: “Your mitochondria function better, you increase ATP production, your metabolism increases in the presence of red light, long wavelength light to the skin.” “Shine long wavelength light on somebody, watch blood glucose levels in a blood glucose test, and it’s blunted.” “Now, the LED lights that are commonly used now… that short wavelength light, in the absence of long wavelength light, has been shown to damage the mitochondria.” “This used to be considered crazy. This was like chemtrail crazy, right?” “But now we’re starting to see from animal studies and human studies, from Glenn Jeffreys and others, that people’s vision gets better when they get in front of an incandescent bulb once a day.” “If they get sunlight, which also has long-wavelength light, your vision improves because of improvements in mitochondria.” The Biden administration quietly pushed incandescents out of the market through aggressive energy regulations. But you can still find them online today if you look hard enough. If that health insight stood out to you, there’s a lot more where that came from. (See post below) This page finds the moments they don’t want going viral, with captions that tell you exactly why they matter before you even hit play. See why 2 million already follow: The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

4,122,757 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Dr. Andrew Huberman just confirmed a “wild conspiracy theory” about incandescent lights and LED bulbs. The long wavelengths found in incandescents increase your metabolism and “charge your mitochondria.” Conversely, the LED bulbs that most of you have in your house are “causing disruptions in mitochondrial function.” DR. ANDREW HUBERMAN: “Your mitochondria function better, you increase ATP production, your metabolism increases in the presence of red light, long wavelength light to the skin.” “Shine long wavelength light on somebody, watch blood glucose levels in a blood glucose test, and it’s blunted.” “Now, the LED lights that are commonly used now… that short wavelength light, in the absence of long wavelength light, has been shown to damage the mitochondria.” “This used to be considered crazy. This was like chemtrail crazy, right?” “But now we’re starting to see from animal studies and human studies, from Glenn Jeffreys and others, that people’s vision gets better when they get in front of an incandescent bulb once a day.” “If they get sunlight, which also has long-wavelength light, your vision improves because of improvements in mitochondria.” The Biden administration quietly pushed incandescents out of the market through aggressive energy regulations. But you can still find them online today if you look hard enough. If that health insight stood out to you, there’s a lot more where that came from.
2:15

Dr. Andrew Huberman just confirmed a “wild conspiracy theory” about incandescent lights and LED bulbs. The long wavelengths found in incandescents increase your metabolism and “charge your mitochondria.” Conversely, the LED bulbs that most of you have in your house are “causing disruptions in mitochondrial function.” DR. ANDREW HUBERMAN: “Your mitochondria function better, you increase ATP production, your metabolism increases in the presence of red light, long wavelength light to the skin.” “Shine long wavelength light on somebody, watch blood glucose levels in a blood glucose test, and it’s blunted.” “Now, the LED lights that are commonly used now… that short wavelength light, in the absence of long wavelength light, has been shown to damage the mitochondria.” “This used to be considered crazy. This was like chemtrail crazy, right?” “But now we’re starting to see from animal studies and human studies, from Glenn Jeffreys and others, that people’s vision gets better when they get in front of an incandescent bulb once a day.” “If they get sunlight, which also has long-wavelength light, your vision improves because of improvements in mitochondria.” The Biden administration quietly pushed incandescents out of the market through aggressive energy regulations. But you can still find them online today if you look hard enough. If that health insight stood out to you, there’s a lot more where that came from.

A Midwestern Doctor

413,133 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

👀 Filmed by me outside on our balcony. This is why LED light is dangerous to our mitochondria. First, let’s understand what we are seeing. Here it is -19°C = -2.2°F . Very different from the coast. The countryside is colder, darker, and holds ice in the air. What we’re seeing is artificial light from street lamps reflecting off ice crystals suspended in very cold air. At around -19°C (from my outdoor thermometer), the air can hold flat, plate-shaped ice crystals that float and slowly fall, almost like microscopic mirrors. 🤔 So why does the light go straight up? Because these ice crystals orient themselves horizontally as they fall. When light from a streetlamp hits them, it reflects vertically, creating straight columns that look like beams shooting into the sky. Our brains expect light to scatter. They are not designed to see perfectly straight columns of light at night. Cold air + ice crystals + modern LED streetlights (highly directional, extremely bright) creates an effect most of us never experienced historically. Older sodium lamps produced soft, diffuse glows. Modern LEDs produce sharp, aggressive pillars, especially in extreme cold. This combination produces light pillars regularly in winter. And this means something worse: Blue light is now being scattered above us and reflected back down, contaminating the night sky from every direction. That is why I call Norway a blue hell zone in winter. Cold should heal mitochondria. Darkness should protect them. LEDs destroy both.
0:58

👀 Filmed by me outside on our balcony. This is why LED light is dangerous to our mitochondria. First, let’s understand what we are seeing. Here it is -19°C = -2.2°F . Very different from the coast. The countryside is colder, darker, and holds ice in the air. What we’re seeing is artificial light from street lamps reflecting off ice crystals suspended in very cold air. At around -19°C (from my outdoor thermometer), the air can hold flat, plate-shaped ice crystals that float and slowly fall, almost like microscopic mirrors. 🤔 So why does the light go straight up? Because these ice crystals orient themselves horizontally as they fall. When light from a streetlamp hits them, it reflects vertically, creating straight columns that look like beams shooting into the sky. Our brains expect light to scatter. They are not designed to see perfectly straight columns of light at night. Cold air + ice crystals + modern LED streetlights (highly directional, extremely bright) creates an effect most of us never experienced historically. Older sodium lamps produced soft, diffuse glows. Modern LEDs produce sharp, aggressive pillars, especially in extreme cold. This combination produces light pillars regularly in winter. And this means something worse: Blue light is now being scattered above us and reflected back down, contaminating the night sky from every direction. That is why I call Norway a blue hell zone in winter. Cold should heal mitochondria. Darkness should protect them. LEDs destroy both.

Light Me Away ☀️

50,928 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

MUST WATCH HEALTH VIDEO: “How Living Indooors Accelerates Disease Generation and Cancer” I promise this video will give you an “aha” moment. In this video you’ll see with your own eyes how indoor living and sunlight through windows causes… Red and infrared light deficiency Blue light toxicity UV light spectrum alteration Low lux circadian rhythm disruption 90% of the average persons day is spent indoors. This is very bad for health. You must take multiple outside sun breaks during the day as well as open your windows. In this video lesson you will see with your own eyes how windows expose you to an artificial spectrum of light that, when compared to natural sunlight, accelerate disease generation and cancer. Retweeet this one now if you can because it’s one of the most important videos I’ve ever made even though off the cuff rambling and incomplete lol….
9:53

MUST WATCH HEALTH VIDEO: “How Living Indooors Accelerates Disease Generation and Cancer” I promise this video will give you an “aha” moment. In this video you’ll see with your own eyes how indoor living and sunlight through windows causes… Red and infrared light deficiency Blue light toxicity UV light spectrum alteration Low lux circadian rhythm disruption 90% of the average persons day is spent indoors. This is very bad for health. You must take multiple outside sun breaks during the day as well as open your windows. In this video lesson you will see with your own eyes how windows expose you to an artificial spectrum of light that, when compared to natural sunlight, accelerate disease generation and cancer. Retweeet this one now if you can because it’s one of the most important videos I’ve ever made even though off the cuff rambling and incomplete lol….

⚡️ The Blue Light Diet ⚡️

105,086 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Rabbi Eli Schlanger, a 40 year old father of 5, murdered on the first night of Chanukah at Bondi Beach for the crime of being Jewish. Tonight we paid a shiva call to his family and they asked us to join them to light for Chanukah. How do we light the menorah in such unimaginably dark times? We light with the illumination of Rabbi Eli's holy neshama which should have the highest aaliyah. There are no words for these moments. Hashem, please, we beg you....ENOUGH PAIN! May Rabbi Eli's family be comforted among the mourners of Zion. May we know no more tragedy like this.
1:31

Rabbi Eli Schlanger, a 40 year old father of 5, murdered on the first night of Chanukah at Bondi Beach for the crime of being Jewish. Tonight we paid a shiva call to his family and they asked us to join them to light for Chanukah. How do we light the menorah in such unimaginably dark times? We light with the illumination of Rabbi Eli's holy neshama which should have the highest aaliyah. There are no words for these moments. Hashem, please, we beg you....ENOUGH PAIN! May Rabbi Eli's family be comforted among the mourners of Zion. May we know no more tragedy like this.

Lizzy Savetsky

44,883 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Every time you look at the stars, you are literally looking back in time. As Professor Brian Cox explains, because light takes time to travel through the vastness of space, we see the Andromeda Galaxy not as it is today, but as it was 2 million years ago. This means that if we look deep enough into the cosmos, we can actually see the oldest light in existence—the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation—a glowing echo that began its journey 13.8 billion years ago, right at the very dawn of the universe.
0:40

Every time you look at the stars, you are literally looking back in time. As Professor Brian Cox explains, because light takes time to travel through the vastness of space, we see the Andromeda Galaxy not as it is today, but as it was 2 million years ago. This means that if we look deep enough into the cosmos, we can actually see the oldest light in existence—the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation—a glowing echo that began its journey 13.8 billion years ago, right at the very dawn of the universe.

Cosmos Archive

21,531 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Desveaux’s Theory of Helix Fields Tweet 1 of 2 For decades, we treated the universe like a giant stage where particles act out their lives. What if the stage itself isn't empty? What if the "void" of space is a structured, rotating medium that is constantly twisting & turning? We have been looking at the pieces of the puzzle, but ignoring the board they sit on. It’s been hiding in plain in sight? My idea on Helix Fields suggests everything we see, from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy, is actually a "corkscrew" in the fabric of reality. In standard physics, we think of particles like tiny billiard balls. In Helix Field Theory, we rethink them as solitons - essentially stable, high-energy "whirlpools" or "corkscrews" made of space itself. Imagine a ribbon. If you pull it straight, it’s flat and simple. But if you twist it, you create a spiral. That twist is what we call Torsion. My theory says that what we perceive as "matter" is simply a place where the vacuum of space is rotating so tightly that it creates a "density core." To explain how this all works, we use a mathematical roadmap called a Lagrangian. Think of it as a master recipe or cookbook for the universe. It combines four key ingredients: 1. Electricity and Magnetism: How light and energy move. 2. Scalar Fields: The underlying "pressure" of the vacuum in space itself 3. Matter: The physical "stuff" we can touch. 4. Torsion: The "twist" or rotational force of space. By looking at the universe through this "helix" lens, we can solve two of the biggest headaches in modern science: The Hubble Tension - Astronomers are currently arguing over how fast the universe is expanding because different measurements give different answers. My theory suggests this "tension" exists because we haven't accounted for the universal rotation (torsion) affecting our measurements. The Dark Sector - We know there is "Dark Matter" and "Dark Energy" out there, but we can't find it. Helix Field Theory suggests these aren't invisible particles, but rather geometric artifacts - ripples and shadows created by the rotating vacuum itself. We are moving away from a universe of "things" and toward a universe of geometry and motion. If the vacuum of space is a structured, rotating medium, then we aren't just living in the universe - we are part of its physical rotation. The "Quantum Substratum" isn't just a theory; it’s a new way to understand the very "twist" of existence. - Protons: tiny rotating black hole-like cores anchoring the scalar field - Neutrons: stabilisers that prevent proton cores from decaying - Quarks & Gluons: the deepest torsion knots; the strong force is intrinsic torsion - Electrons: corkscrew-shaped solitons producing microscopic magnetic vortices - Neutrinos: ultra-light messenger waves traveling along the field’s “communication lines.” - Photons: instruction ripples traveling at light speed - Dark Photons: the “torsion messengers” of the Helix Field. They carry the twist, regulate the twist, and stabilize the twisting motion - W and Z bosons: on/off switches and stabilising nodes in the neutrino network - Higgs field: the local density of the scalar field, giving solitons their effective mass - Dark energy: the gentle outward push caused by the field’s overall rotation - Entropy: friction in that rotation, giving time its arrow - Cosmic Microwave Background: the universal “sustain pedal” like on a guitar or piano, keeping the field’s vibrations in phase. In this vision, dark matter isn’t missing matter - it’s the gravitational echo of the scalar field itself. Exploring antiparticles further: they may regulate the flow of time itself. In a rotational and torsional universe Time is a neutral observer: the past and future are fixed, but the present - our free will - is the point where choices echo into fate. Time is the “God” of the universe: ever-present, ever-aware, never interfering - just watching, as we decide which thread to follow.
1:18

Desveaux’s Theory of Helix Fields Tweet 1 of 2 For decades, we treated the universe like a giant stage where particles act out their lives. What if the stage itself isn't empty? What if the "void" of space is a structured, rotating medium that is constantly twisting & turning? We have been looking at the pieces of the puzzle, but ignoring the board they sit on. It’s been hiding in plain in sight? My idea on Helix Fields suggests everything we see, from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy, is actually a "corkscrew" in the fabric of reality. In standard physics, we think of particles like tiny billiard balls. In Helix Field Theory, we rethink them as solitons - essentially stable, high-energy "whirlpools" or "corkscrews" made of space itself. Imagine a ribbon. If you pull it straight, it’s flat and simple. But if you twist it, you create a spiral. That twist is what we call Torsion. My theory says that what we perceive as "matter" is simply a place where the vacuum of space is rotating so tightly that it creates a "density core." To explain how this all works, we use a mathematical roadmap called a Lagrangian. Think of it as a master recipe or cookbook for the universe. It combines four key ingredients: 1. Electricity and Magnetism: How light and energy move. 2. Scalar Fields: The underlying "pressure" of the vacuum in space itself 3. Matter: The physical "stuff" we can touch. 4. Torsion: The "twist" or rotational force of space. By looking at the universe through this "helix" lens, we can solve two of the biggest headaches in modern science: The Hubble Tension - Astronomers are currently arguing over how fast the universe is expanding because different measurements give different answers. My theory suggests this "tension" exists because we haven't accounted for the universal rotation (torsion) affecting our measurements. The Dark Sector - We know there is "Dark Matter" and "Dark Energy" out there, but we can't find it. Helix Field Theory suggests these aren't invisible particles, but rather geometric artifacts - ripples and shadows created by the rotating vacuum itself. We are moving away from a universe of "things" and toward a universe of geometry and motion. If the vacuum of space is a structured, rotating medium, then we aren't just living in the universe - we are part of its physical rotation. The "Quantum Substratum" isn't just a theory; it’s a new way to understand the very "twist" of existence. - Protons: tiny rotating black hole-like cores anchoring the scalar field - Neutrons: stabilisers that prevent proton cores from decaying - Quarks & Gluons: the deepest torsion knots; the strong force is intrinsic torsion - Electrons: corkscrew-shaped solitons producing microscopic magnetic vortices - Neutrinos: ultra-light messenger waves traveling along the field’s “communication lines.” - Photons: instruction ripples traveling at light speed - Dark Photons: the “torsion messengers” of the Helix Field. They carry the twist, regulate the twist, and stabilize the twisting motion - W and Z bosons: on/off switches and stabilising nodes in the neutrino network - Higgs field: the local density of the scalar field, giving solitons their effective mass - Dark energy: the gentle outward push caused by the field’s overall rotation - Entropy: friction in that rotation, giving time its arrow - Cosmic Microwave Background: the universal “sustain pedal” like on a guitar or piano, keeping the field’s vibrations in phase. In this vision, dark matter isn’t missing matter - it’s the gravitational echo of the scalar field itself. Exploring antiparticles further: they may regulate the flow of time itself. In a rotational and torsional universe Time is a neutral observer: the past and future are fixed, but the present - our free will - is the point where choices echo into fate. Time is the “God” of the universe: ever-present, ever-aware, never interfering - just watching, as we decide which thread to follow.

Clinton Desveaux

23,492 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The Patriarch Diodoros I of Jerusalem himself described what happens: “From the core of the very stone on which Jesus lay an indefinable light pours forth. It usually has a blue tint, but the color may change and take on many different hues. It cannot be described in human terms. The light rises out of the stone as mist may rise out of a lake — it almost looks as if the stone is covered by a moist cloud, but it is light. This light behaves differently each year. Sometimes it covers just the stone, while other times it gives light to the whole sepulchre, so that people who are standing outside the tomb and look into it see the tomb filled with light. The light does not burn — I have never had my beard burnt in all the sixteen years I have been Patriarch in Jerusalem and have received the Holy Fire.” Thousands of pilgrims hold their hands and faces in the flame and report the same thing. It does not burn.
0:26

The Patriarch Diodoros I of Jerusalem himself described what happens: “From the core of the very stone on which Jesus lay an indefinable light pours forth. It usually has a blue tint, but the color may change and take on many different hues. It cannot be described in human terms. The light rises out of the stone as mist may rise out of a lake — it almost looks as if the stone is covered by a moist cloud, but it is light. This light behaves differently each year. Sometimes it covers just the stone, while other times it gives light to the whole sepulchre, so that people who are standing outside the tomb and look into it see the tomb filled with light. The light does not burn — I have never had my beard burnt in all the sixteen years I have been Patriarch in Jerusalem and have received the Holy Fire.” Thousands of pilgrims hold their hands and faces in the flame and report the same thing. It does not burn.

sacredchad

18,596 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce