Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Universities teach many erroneous models. One example of a misleading teaching is the Newtonian model of the prism. A man named Johann Goethe corrected and complimented Newton's model about 100 years after Newton. It is not the same light passing through the prism and distributing. It is a brand-new... light with each beam of color. The primary light hitting the prism is extinguished by the electrons making up the glass of the prism itself. Those same electrons re-emit a brand new light from each angle. That process happens at the rate of c. Serving the illusion that the original white light came it... separated and exited to continue on. Most people rely on outdated text books or the Pink Floyd album cover "Dark Side of the Moon" to get their information about light and color and prisms. The depictions of light "splitting" and "bending" through a prism based on their color is false. (See first comments for attached images and substantiation) I filmed these videos playing around with prisms, lasers, magnifying glasses, mirrors, slits, and colored filters. I've gained my own perspectives on light and color over the years from real world, hands-on experimentation and observation. Most people have never held a real glass prism their own hands and done the tests to see for themselves. 2 prisms for $10 Harmonics of Light and Sound: This guy said his units were confiscated by the FBI and he was threatened not to pursue manufacturing them. The unit is simply a light with a magnifying glass and colored filters to isolate the light. Like burning an ant with a focal point... but with a specific color. The lens can spin and create a stroboscopic effect in an isolated band. The inventor claimed it healed stuff. Dinshah Spectro-Chrome Machine - Tour and Explanation Magenta monochromatic ray of shadow - Pehr Sahlstrom: Color and Physics, Newton versus Goethe - Pehr Sahlstrom: Thomas Joseph Brown Color Theory: Clay Taylor Color Theory: Testing the "Rightness" of relativity. The impossibility of proving something through experiments. Laser and Mirror observation: It's never the same light. Re-emission Example: I put this interactive page together going back and forth with ChatGPT to code using Javascript. Here is a video playing with the slide controls to show 3 different sinewaves (3 different lights/emissions). The packets are ALWAYS in phase from medium to medium. The frequency shifts BECAUSE the velocity of light shifts. NOT a Doppler shift of "the same light" distorting within the same frame of reference. It's a brand new light at each point. The incoming light is a different frame of reference. All the light you ever see is the re-emitted light from the electrons making up yourself. Propagation and Re-Emission of Light: Dr. Edward Dowdye Slides - LOTS of math and context. E.H. Dowdye, Can Stars BEND LIGHT? General Relativity and Gravity with Dr. Edward Dowdye Challenges to Gravitational Lensing and More: 71 Part Video Series (Each vid is 1 min - 1 and a hafl min) The Rebirth of Classical Physics - Time, Light & Gravity Classical Physics vs Relativity - History, Examples and Alternatives: Illusions of Relativity: Space-Time vs Real-Time The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity - Article Packed with Info & Links Thought Experiment for Light and Absolute Time. (This scenario got me banned from talking on a Podcast.) "Too off the rails."show more

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

19,588 subscribers

44,361 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Education Science & Technology News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 Comments

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)1 year ago

Light does not "bend" through a prism as they teach or depict in cartoons and university text books. At what point does an "oversimplification" just become a lie or a fallacy?

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)1 year ago

Demonstrating Johann Goethe Colored Shadows Yellow is the shadow of Blue Cyan is the shadow of Red Magenta is the shadow of Green In my model, gravity propagates just like light. A photon is an energy packet, not a particle. The packet is produced from single electrons dropping energy levels within 3 dimensions. The absorption of that photon packet and subsequent re-emission of a secondary packet produces the effect of illumination. A graviton is an energy packet, not a particle. The packet is initially produced from electron pairs dropping energy levels from a 2D coherent state, back to a 3D incoherent state. The absorption of that graviton packet and subsequent re-emission of a secondary packet produces the effect of gravitation. There is a Newtonian Spectrum and a Goetheanian spectrum to both light and gravity. When they merge, it produces a full spectrum. The same rules for optics apply to gravitation, but with slightly tweaked equations. I provide those equations in detail in my books which will be released in a couple months. Been editing the audio books like a mad man for over 2 months straight.

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)1 year ago

All the light you ever see is the re-emitted light from the electrons making up yourself. All the gravity you ever feel is the re-emitted gravity from the electrons making up yourself. Don't have to worry about the weight of the world Atlas... only need to worry about the electrons making up yourself. The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)1 year ago

By having a proper understanding of Light... we can apply those fundamentals to magnetism and even gravity. Since light, magnetism and gravity are all ultimately produced by electrons... we can have a better foundation to understand how they can work together. Or use the fundamentals of one to apply in another area. All of this is included in my books. Combining the work of some of the greatest minds you ever heard of... with the greatest minds you've never heard of. Magnetic Waveforms Thread: Visual Context for Magnetic Sinewaves: Visual Context for Magnetic Waveforms generating electricity: Applying magnetic waveforms to a generator (SEG): Magnetic Waveforms Polarity Flip Context: The work of Jon DePew Ignored Magnetic Experiments of Jon Depew:

El Jefe1 year ago

When in your free time are you going to teach coursera classes for the rest of us?

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)1 year ago

I would love to. That's been my goal for many years. To have an online university and/or teach in person at a physical location. I want to offer text books with every left hand page the outdated Lorentz invariance model and every right hand page the updated corrections under Galilean Variance.

Jessie Pendse1 year ago

🇺🇸👉❤️I wonder if you ever believe that human beings will really discover anything in its purest form. We claim discoveries or theories only to have them disproved by someone else many decades later. Do you wonder who will disprove you as we go more and more micro?

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)1 year ago

Proof is math. To disprove the information means to offer a new mathematical framework to challenge Galilean variance. This emissions theory assumes there is no particle-wave duality and the velocity of light shifts in different frames of reference. The velocity of light is dependent upon the velocity of the light source whether it be approaching towards or receding away from the observer. But the illusion is that the observer's own electrons will absorb that incoming primary light and re-emit a brand new secondary light as an equal and opposite reaction. Disproving that would mean to offer a new interpretation backed by an opposing framework. The proof for aether is under Galilean invariance. The proof for space-time curvature which disproves aether is under Lorentz invariance (relativity) The proof for re-emissions which disproves space-time curvature is under Galilean variance. Dr. Edward Dowdye first presented his "Extinction Shift Principle" in 1991. And that is the proof of re-emissions from different frames of reference. For the first time in human history... and for the first time since the 1600's with Isaac Newton... Dowdye is the first person to ever suggest the notion of a brand new light re-emitted. Discourses & Mathematical Illustrations Pertaining to Extinction Shift Principle Under the Electrodynamics of Galilean Transformations: Why Should We Question Relativity? (FAQs): Optics, Electrodynamics & Gravitation based from Re-Worked classical physics/ Galilean Transformations under Euclidean Space I use an analogy like Matrishka Dolls/Russian Dolls. But with dunce caps on our own heads. Whenever you evolve an idea or have a new realization... you take a dunce cap off your head. ... but there's just another smaller dunce cap! lol Every time you learn something or offer a new perspective and justify it with substantiation... you take off another dunce cap. You'll never have a bare head. You'll always have a dunce cap. The goal is to minimize the size and take off as many as you can in life. But a smaller one will always remain.

Related Videos

Is Relativity "right"? What do you mean by "right?" Here is an example of Evidence versus Proof when trying to show tests for or against a given model... Point a LASER or flashlight at a mirror. Pointing a light at a mirror, does not give you any math or proofs. But when you point a LASER at a mirror… You can interpret that scenario under Lorentz transformations. And that will mathematically "prove" it is the same light ricocheting off the surface of the mirror and continuing on within the same frame of reference. But that same scenario under Galilean transformations will mathematically "prove" it is a primary light hitting the mirror… And the electrons making up the surface of the mirror, will absorb that incoming primary and re-emit a brand new secondary light as an equal and opposite reaction. And that happens at the rate of c, serving the illusion that it's the same light bouncing back. And every point of interference and re-emission is a new frame of reference. You can point a light at a mirror 10,000 times… That experiment will not prove either scenario. Pointing a LASER at a mirror does not prove it is the same beam or a different beam. That "proof" is in the mathematical interpretation of the scenario. Does the mathematical justification make a given theory "right" though? If the math under Lorentz transformations makes Relativity "right"... then the math under Galilean transformations makes Dr. Dowdye's Extinction Shift Principle "right". For the same evidence and scenario. So, what does it really mean to be "right"? The entire world can conduct 10,000 experiments over and over… All it will do is provide EVIDENCE. And the entire world is interpreting that evidence under one specific mathematical framework of Lorentz transformations using relativistic procedures. But, indeed, there are other experiments to show unreconcilable discrepancies of relativity; as well as, other mathematical approaches to yield the same predictions and solutions as relativity using Galilean transformations. Back to the simplicity and elegance of Classical Physics again. But now under "a new light" thanks to Dr. Edward Dowdye's reformulations in 1991. When you hear a horn pass by you and change pitch... Doppler Shift and Relativity assumes The Same Sound constantly distorts within the same frame of reference. But Dr. Dowdye's Extinction Shift Principle views the same scenario as a brand new sound being produced at a constant and a stationary observer is hearing a brand new sound at at constant from constantly changing frame of reference. Lorentz transformations/ Relativity assumes The Same primary light propagates out from a source... gets interfered with and distorts... and then continues on as a distorted primary within the same frame of reference. But Galilean transformations as reformulated by Dr. Dowdye/ Effectivity assumes a brand new light and brand new sound is produced at a constant and when the path of that packet EM Radiation is interfered with... the electrons making up that blockage will absorb the primary, which diminishes to zero and becomes extinguished. Extinct. Those same electrons will re-emit a brand new secondary which simultaneously crescendos in proportion as an equal and opposite reaction. That process happens at a constant at the rate of c as well. And every point of re-emission is a new frame of reference with that new secondary light traveling relative to the electrons making up the blockage/ interference itself. Discourses & Mathematical Illustrations Pertaining to the Extinction Shift Principle Under the Electrodynamics of Galilean Transformations: Introduction to the Extinction Shift Principle: A Pure Classical Replacement for Relativity (Peer Reviewed Paper) Propagation and Re-Emission of Light: The Rebirth of Classic Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Videos for more context from my video titled Illusions of Relativity: Space-Time vs Real-Time Wave-Fronts and Wave-Ends: Reflection or Re-Emission?: The Velocity of Light IS Dependent Upon the Velocity of the Light Source: Evidence versus Proof: What is the point of Science?: AS IF ≠ Literal: Which is the Simpler Solution?: Alternative to the Perihelion of Mercury: In this Twitter/X thread, I'll introduce the brilliant work of Dr. Edward Dowdye. Credible Challenges to General & Special Relativity, Doppler Shift Theory and more. Retired NASA Engineer, University Professor of Mathematics and internationally recognized expert in atomic physics, optics, LASERs and satellites. If Einstein were alive today, he would concede to Dr. Dowdye's mathematical proofs under Galilean Transformations and re-interpreting all past experimental evidence attributed to Relativity.

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

24,484 views • 2 years ago

Thought experiment for people regarding the concept of Absolute Time. Absolute means NO EXCEPTIONS. We are NOT looking back in time when we see galaxies and stars. We are NOT looking back in time 1.25 seconds when we see the moon. We're Not looking back in time 3 minutes when we see Mars. We're Not looking back in time 8.33 minutes when we see the Sun. If an astronaut lit a matchstick on Mars, the distant observer would see predator heat waves at the top of the matchstick in real-time while the matchstick started to blacken towards the astronaut's fingers. But there would be no orange light from that chemical reaction or flame seen. If the matchstick burnt out before the packet of orange light from that particular chemical reaction made it to Earth… then the distant observer would just see a disembodied orange flash of light with a lag. But the Earth-bound observer would never actually see the flame associated with the orange wavelength it put out. The wavelength of color emitted by the flame is not a recording of reality. If the orange light is 650 Thz, that means there are 650 trillion individual and separate bursts of orange light pulsating in 1 second. NOT that "the same light" is "waving" 650 trillion times a second and that light is a recording of reality. There are 650 trillion brand-new lights flashing in 1 second. Each Hertz is a brand-new emission and packet unto itself. Time does not re-emit 650 trillion times a second, nor is a photon a particle or a packet of reality acting like the frame of a reel of footage. The orange light that already left the flame will continue to propagate out until it meets the electrons making up the distant observer. But remember, it is never the same light within that packet. And the electrons making up the observer will absorb all of those different lights within that packet and re-emit brand-new lights that produce the product of illumination. A photon is a massless packet of energy, spherically expanding at the rate of c from the source it comes from. Illumination is the result of that energy being absorbed and RE-emitted by any other electrons that did not output that primary packet. But time is not associated with the same light. It's never the same light and time does not re-emit between packets. Time is not relative. Do NOT allow your mind Carte Blanche to think along the lines of relative time. DROP IT for this thought experiment. We are thinking along the lines of ABSOLUTE TIME/ Galilean VARIANCE. What does absolute time mean? It means time is constant in ALL frames of reference. Any frequency shifts between atomic clocks IS a literal change in the speed of light. But relativity forbids the speed of light from Ever changing, so relativity (Lorentz INVARIANCE) invented the concept of the 4th dimension and space-time. Because Relativity doesn't allow light speed to shift.. they interpret the same frequency shift between atomic clocks as being conclusive, irrefutable evidence that time and reality itself shifts. Rather than say it's just that ONE clock being affected by Earth's gravity and the oscillation of that ONE cesium clock is being altered compared to other clocks. People don't realize that in relativity... time dilation is SYMMETRICAL! Not even most relativists know their own theory. If Clock A and Clock B are synchronized and together... and then they accelerate apart... Einstein said Clock A would see Clock B as being slower itself. And Clock B would view Clock A as slower than ITself. NOT that only one observer would see back in time and the other would see forward or not at all. No... BOTH observers are supposed to see each other BACK in time relative to each other according to Einstein and the consequence of the math. It doesn't make ANY sense!! But relativists toss that part of time dilation under their 4th dimensional rug. The rug is woven from threads of gold that only the smart people can see apparently. So... here's a thought experiment/ Gedankenexperiment for absolute time. NO paradoxes... no nonsense or confusion. What do you see in a club? You see disco lights changing and a color wheel effect. You see everyone in REAL-TIME. Not just because they are so close to the lights. Light is not a recording of reality. Light is simply color. Illuminating reality in a certain color. Just because you can't see something yet or the color hasn't reached you doesn't mean it isn't happening in real-time. Zoom out and look at the people in the club through binoculars a mile away. You are still looking at them in real-time. The colors are shifting with a delay in the club. Now look at the club through a telescope from the surface of the moon. You're still looking at the people in real-time. But now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 1.25 seconds because it takes light 1.25 seconds to travel from the Earth to the moon. Now look at the club through an even bigger telescope from the surface of Mars. You're still looking at the people in real-time, but now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 3 minutes because it takes light 3 minutes to travel from Earth to Mars. fr you are a third hypothetical observer zoomed out and watching the person from Mars AND seeing the club on Earth... you're still seeing everything happening in real-time as well. But you see the colored wavepackets traveling with a delay to the observer on Mars. And the disco color wheel effect is just lagging before it affects the observer from Mars and the observer on the Moon. It doesn't matter how far you zoom out! There is only now to observe. But there WILL be a lag and delay for a given color/wavepacket to reach distant observers. But all points in space are already illuminated by other starlight. So if you're too far away... you'll just see the club in real-time but without any disco lights. Just see them in white light because that's the source already illuminating the scene. This is where it gets the most difficult because people think light itself is a recording of reality that replays a scene from where it came from. But another punch in the gut of relativity is that in order to see REFLECTED light... that would require a TWO-WAY transit. Which means the light would have to be sent out... record the scene of a distant event and then RETURN in order to REplay the event. Which means it would take 6 minutes to see the club from Mars by that logic and 2.5 seconds to see the club from the moon by that logic. The difference in tick rates between clocks has NOTHING to do with time dilation. Wait.. what?! How can that be? Because a clock itself doesn't represent all of time and reality. The difference between clocks is a "Transverse relative time shift." If the only light in the universe was from the lighter… the only way a distant observer would be able to see the astronaut on Mars is if the astronaut held down the button of the lighter for longer than 3 minutes. It takes 3 minutes for the packet of light to travel from Mars to Earth. The distant observer would never be able to see Mars, unless the light stretched from Mars all the way to Earth, and illuminated the path between Mars and Earth. And that would take 3 minutes for the boundary and first part of that wave packet to reach Earth. But if the distant observer wanted to observe Mars in real-time… then that packet of light would have to be on for longer than 3 minutes. So if the astronaut on Mars flicked the lighter at 12:00, the distant observer on Earth wouldn't see anything until 12:03. If the light was on for 3 minutes and 10 seconds, and the distant observer is 3 light minutes away... the distant observer would be able to see Mars in real-time for 10 seconds starting at 12:03. In the 20 second video clip of the rotating planet with shifting colors... just imagine you're a couple light minutes or light seconds away. You're still seeing the planet spin in real-time. But there is simply a delay of switching colors. You are Not looking back in time. It's just a color wheel effect from a great distance away. That's it!! There are many major flaws which tarnish people's critical thinking on this thought experiment. 1. Light does NOT ricochet or bounce. Electrons absorb, emit and re-emit ALL electromagnetic radiation. The electrons, making up the glass of a mirror will absorb the incoming light and re-emit a brand-new light as an equal and opposite reaction. NOT that "the same light" bounced off the mirror and continued on within the same frame of reference. 2. Light is NOT a recording of reality. 3. It is NOT the same light being observed from a source. It's never the same light. Each Hertz is a new light. Think of half of a sine wave as being its own emission. On an oscilloscope, a stimulus generates a peak which initiates an equal and opposite trough. Or vice versa. That repeating process is not "the same light." If you cut and paste that sine wave to another sine wave, the boundary between the waves will always be in phase. (thus refraction) 4. The speed of light is NOT the same in ALL frames of reference, no matter what. 5. Light is NOT made of particles and waves that flip back-and-forth. 6. Time is NOT connected to the speed of light. Time remains constant regardless if you accelerate towards or away from a clock. The clocks themselves will indeed be off! But that's an affect on the electrons making up the atomic clock affecting the oscillation of the isotope which is ASSUMED to ALWAYS be the same. So ANY difference in oscillation is treated as a literal distortion in space-time. 7. Space and time are not linked at all. That is a mathematical artifice under Lorentz invariance. Time is relative under Lorentz invariance. But time is absolute under Galilean VARIANCE. When people hear or see the word GALILEAN... their brains switch to auto pilot to "aether theory" and "classical physics." What people don't realize is that aether theory used Galilean INVARIANCE. Rather than space-time being used as an excuse to explain the difference in frequencies between atomic clocks... it was originally aether being used as an excuse to keep the speed of light the same. But None of those things are valid! We are thinking under the framework of Galilean VARIANCE! Completely new revolutionary model returning to Isaac Newton and Classical physics but without the corpuscular theory (particle) theory for light... without a particle-wave duality... without an aether... without a 4th dimension. Just good ol elementary math within 3D Euclidean space. Everything happening in real-time, right now. This reformulation of Galilean transformations was offered by Dr. Edward Dowdye in 1991 called The Extinction Shift Principle. Effectivity as opposed to Relativity. If light required a two-way transit, in order to travel out… Record an event, and travel back to replay the recording… then it would take 6 minutes to see the astronaut on Mars instead of 3. Remember… They say the SAME light is a recording, and must travel there and travel back in order to REplay. Relativity says time is relative: t' ≠ t time is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and t = tₒ / √1 - v²/c² but Galilean Variance says time is not relative: t' = t (Time IS the same from all frames of reference) and τ_tr = τₒ / √1 - v²/c² Relativity says c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference) but Galilean variance says c' ≠ c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and that c' = c ± v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer) Relativity says E = mc² (Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.) but Galilean variance says E = Δmc² = mₒc² (Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mₒ represents the original mass. Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.) The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Star light and illumination: Flicking a Lighter on Mars visual example:

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

16,608 views • 1 year ago

‘Allah is the Light of the heavens and the earth. The example of His light is like a niche within which is a lamp, the lamp is within glass, the glass as if it were a brilliant star, lit from a blessed olive tree, neither of the east nor of the west, whose oil would almost glow even if untouched by fire. Light upon light. Allah guides to His light whom He wills. And Allah presents examples for the people, and Allah is Knowing of all things.’ 📖 Surah An-Nur — Ayah 24:35

‘Allah is the Light of the heavens and the earth. The example of His light is like a niche within which is a lamp, the lamp is within glass, the glass as if it were a brilliant star, lit from a blessed olive tree, neither of the east nor of the west, whose oil would almost glow even if untouched by fire. Light upon light. Allah guides to His light whom He wills. And Allah presents examples for the people, and Allah is Knowing of all things.’ 📖 Surah An-Nur — Ayah 24:35

Er. J Ahmad

14,575 views • 3 months ago

The Patriarch Diodoros I of Jerusalem himself described what happens: “From the core of the very stone on which Jesus lay an indefinable light pours forth. It usually has a blue tint, but the color may change and take on many different hues. It cannot be described in human terms. The light rises out of the stone as mist may rise out of a lake — it almost looks as if the stone is covered by a moist cloud, but it is light. This light behaves differently each year. Sometimes it covers just the stone, while other times it gives light to the whole sepulchre, so that people who are standing outside the tomb and look into it see the tomb filled with light. The light does not burn — I have never had my beard burnt in all the sixteen years I have been Patriarch in Jerusalem and have received the Holy Fire.” Thousands of pilgrims hold their hands and faces in the flame and report the same thing. It does not burn.

The Patriarch Diodoros I of Jerusalem himself described what happens: “From the core of the very stone on which Jesus lay an indefinable light pours forth. It usually has a blue tint, but the color may change and take on many different hues. It cannot be described in human terms. The light rises out of the stone as mist may rise out of a lake — it almost looks as if the stone is covered by a moist cloud, but it is light. This light behaves differently each year. Sometimes it covers just the stone, while other times it gives light to the whole sepulchre, so that people who are standing outside the tomb and look into it see the tomb filled with light. The light does not burn — I have never had my beard burnt in all the sixteen years I have been Patriarch in Jerusalem and have received the Holy Fire.” Thousands of pilgrims hold their hands and faces in the flame and report the same thing. It does not burn.

sacredchad

18,596 views • 2 months ago

The house of the Lord—holy temples of light—enrich our minds and spirits and bless us with God’s light. Jesus said, “Ye are the light of the world” (Matthew 5:14). This light that burns within each of us comes from God and is part of our divine nature.

The house of the Lord—holy temples of light—enrich our minds and spirits and bless us with God’s light. Jesus said, “Ye are the light of the world” (Matthew 5:14). This light that burns within each of us comes from God and is part of our divine nature.

Neil L. Andersen

27,392 views • 1 year ago

New Flamingo Commission 🦩 “light color form” by Zach Lieberman Made with c++ & <3, “light color form” is highly emblematic of zach lieberman's deft use of code to create emulations of light and sharp angles. The work is part of his ongoing "light studies" exploration.

New Flamingo Commission 🦩 “light color form” by Zach Lieberman Made with c++ & <3, “light color form” is highly emblematic of zach lieberman's deft use of code to create emulations of light and sharp angles. The work is part of his ongoing "light studies" exploration.

FLAMINGO 🦩

31,820 views • 3 years ago

Message from #NEIOH ~ The Light Of The Pleiades "In The Pleiades, Cycles Are Chosen To Experience Light And Darkness. This Is Quite Amazing As The Individual Soul Can Choose This. A Family Might Decide To Venture Out And Swim In The Ocean. Others Might Race Vehicular Crafts. They Might Choose By Intention To Experience Great Light Over The Area. Another Group Might Decide To Entertain In Darker Hues And Dimmer Lights With Dancing And Sharing Meals. Imagine A World Of Color, Sound And Light That Is Chosen. This Is The Truth Of What Awaits You!" Podcast YouTube

Message from #NEIOH ~ The Light Of The Pleiades "In The Pleiades, Cycles Are Chosen To Experience Light And Darkness. This Is Quite Amazing As The Individual Soul Can Choose This. A Family Might Decide To Venture Out And Swim In The Ocean. Others Might Race Vehicular Crafts. They Might Choose By Intention To Experience Great Light Over The Area. Another Group Might Decide To Entertain In Darker Hues And Dimmer Lights With Dancing And Sharing Meals. Imagine A World Of Color, Sound And Light That Is Chosen. This Is The Truth Of What Awaits You!" Podcast YouTube

Kab

74,043 views • 1 year ago

GOD CREATED YOU FROM WITHIN HIMSELF, YOU ARE THE SPARK OF LIFE THE LIGHT ON A HILL THAT CAN NOT BE HIDDEN. THE LIGHT SHINES IN THE DARKNESS AND THE DARKNESS HAS NOT OVERCOME IT. HIS WORD IS THE LAMP TO OUR FEET AND A LIGHT TO OUR PATH.

GOD CREATED YOU FROM WITHIN HIMSELF, YOU ARE THE SPARK OF LIFE THE LIGHT ON A HILL THAT CAN NOT BE HIDDEN. THE LIGHT SHINES IN THE DARKNESS AND THE DARKNESS HAS NOT OVERCOME IT. HIS WORD IS THE LAMP TO OUR FEET AND A LIGHT TO OUR PATH.

YEHI 'OHR

17,821 views • 1 year ago

Thomas Young's double-slit experiment, performed in 1801, is one of the most important demonstrations in physics. It provided strong evidence that light behaves as a wave by producing interference patterns. In the experiment, coherent light is directed at an opaque barrier with two closely spaced slits. The light waves passing through these slits interfere with one another, creating a pattern of bright and dark fringes on a screen positioned behind the slits. The spacing and location of these fringes depend on the light's wavelength, the distance between the two slits, and the distance to the screen. This experiment established the wave nature of light. The modern understanding of wave-particle duality, where light can also behave like particles (photons), developed in the early 20th century with quantum mechanics, and is beautifully illustrated by modern versions of the double-slit experiment performed with individual photons.

Thomas Young's double-slit experiment, performed in 1801, is one of the most important demonstrations in physics. It provided strong evidence that light behaves as a wave by producing interference patterns. In the experiment, coherent light is directed at an opaque barrier with two closely spaced slits. The light waves passing through these slits interfere with one another, creating a pattern of bright and dark fringes on a screen positioned behind the slits. The spacing and location of these fringes depend on the light's wavelength, the distance between the two slits, and the distance to the screen. This experiment established the wave nature of light. The modern understanding of wave-particle duality, where light can also behave like particles (photons), developed in the early 20th century with quantum mechanics, and is beautifully illustrated by modern versions of the double-slit experiment performed with individual photons.

The Math Flow

13,424 views • 4 months ago

Professor Brian Cox explains using a simple light clock, time is not absolute. Because the speed of light remains constant, a light beam in a moving clock traces a longer, diagonal path from an outside observer's perspective, proving that moving clocks run slower and time literally bends to the speed of the observer. This reveals a mind-bending reality: if you journeyed through space at 99.94% the speed of light for ten years, you would return to an Earth that had aged 29 years; making you a literal time traveler into the future.

Professor Brian Cox explains using a simple light clock, time is not absolute. Because the speed of light remains constant, a light beam in a moving clock traces a longer, diagonal path from an outside observer's perspective, proving that moving clocks run slower and time literally bends to the speed of the observer. This reveals a mind-bending reality: if you journeyed through space at 99.94% the speed of light for ten years, you would return to an Earth that had aged 29 years; making you a literal time traveler into the future.

Cosmos Archive

146,330 views • 3 months ago

Boost A Mass To Light Speed, And Gravity Becomes A Shockwave. The Aichelburg-Sexl Ultraboost is an exact solution of General Relativity obtained by boosting the Schwarzschild gravitational field toward light speed while keeping the energy finite.

Boost A Mass To Light Speed, And Gravity Becomes A Shockwave. The Aichelburg-Sexl Ultraboost is an exact solution of General Relativity obtained by boosting the Schwarzschild gravitational field toward light speed while keeping the energy finite.

Mathelirium

12,414 views • 1 month ago

The journey of Moth for me has been about light. Recognizing the light within, gaining strength from the light of others when I can’t find my own, sharing my light when it’s needed and ultimately understanding that love, life and light is above all. Moth is out now!

The journey of Moth for me has been about light. Recognizing the light within, gaining strength from the light of others when I can’t find my own, sharing my light when it’s needed and ultimately understanding that love, life and light is above all. Moth is out now!

Fana Hues

18,185 views • 2 years ago

Message from #LAKA ~ The Ultimate Duality Of OSOH "This Star Called OSOH Has Always Been Observed By Pleiadians. Many Light Beings And Angels Have Arrived To Guide Animals To Sustenance And To Save Children And Adults From Landslides And Drownings." "Some Of These Have Been Assisted By The Light That Is Always Serving. Light Will Connect To Light With Spirit. But Free Will Allows The Manner Of Life. The Shift To Sheen Is The Beginning Of Freedom For So Many Living In Desolation." "There Will Be A Great Moment Of Upgrading For The OS Of Such Confusion. The Galactic Federation Is Close With Motherships And Abilities Unlimited. These Souls Will Be Upgraded To Light With Crystal Hearts. They Will Be Free And The Clarity Of Existence Will Bring Love Never Known."

Message from #LAKA ~ The Ultimate Duality Of OSOH "This Star Called OSOH Has Always Been Observed By Pleiadians. Many Light Beings And Angels Have Arrived To Guide Animals To Sustenance And To Save Children And Adults From Landslides And Drownings." "Some Of These Have Been Assisted By The Light That Is Always Serving. Light Will Connect To Light With Spirit. But Free Will Allows The Manner Of Life. The Shift To Sheen Is The Beginning Of Freedom For So Many Living In Desolation." "There Will Be A Great Moment Of Upgrading For The OS Of Such Confusion. The Galactic Federation Is Close With Motherships And Abilities Unlimited. These Souls Will Be Upgraded To Light With Crystal Hearts. They Will Be Free And The Clarity Of Existence Will Bring Love Never Known."

Kab

64,910 views • 1 year ago

When LIGHT passes through a PRISM, it separates into the 'colour spectrum' based on its FREQUENCY... Our BODY is made of mostly WATER 💦 acting as a prism. So when light passes through, it SEPARATES into our 7 chakras based on the frequency of light.

When LIGHT passes through a PRISM, it separates into the 'colour spectrum' based on its FREQUENCY... Our BODY is made of mostly WATER 💦 acting as a prism. So when light passes through, it SEPARATES into our 7 chakras based on the frequency of light.

WhatdoIknow

135,455 views • 1 year ago

$Vegetable Oil and Pyrex have the same refractive indexes of 1.47. When light travels through the glass and then the oil, the speed of light slows down and on reflection, makes the glass seem invisible.$

Vegetable Oil and Pyrex have the same refractive indexes of 1.47. When light travels through the glass and then the oil, the speed of light slows down and on reflection, makes the glass seem invisible.

History Defined

18,029 views • 5 months ago

$Vegetable Oil and Pyrex have the same refractive indexes of 1.47. When light travels through the glass and then the oil, the speed of light slows down and on reflection, makes the glass seem invisible.$

Vegetable Oil and Pyrex have the same refractive indexes of 1.47. When light travels through the glass and then the oil, the speed of light slows down and on reflection, makes the glass seem invisible.

Fascinating

622,692 views • 7 months ago

Baptised Catholics who walk away from the true Church often claim they have “seen the light.” But let’s be clear, that is not the light. No failure of a priest. No scandal of a bishop. Not even the weakness of a Pope is ever a justification to abandon the Catholic Church. The truth is this: you don’t leave Christ because of Judas. The Catholic Church is not built on the perfection of men. it is built on Christ Himself and sustained by the Eucharist. Those who truly understand and value the Eucharist do not walk away from it. Call it what it is, not “seeing the light,” but turning away from it. Leaving the Catholic Church is synonymous with turning away from the Light.

Baptised Catholics who walk away from the true Church often claim they have “seen the light.” But let’s be clear, that is not the light. No failure of a priest. No scandal of a bishop. Not even the weakness of a Pope is ever a justification to abandon the Catholic Church. The truth is this: you don’t leave Christ because of Judas. The Catholic Church is not built on the perfection of men. it is built on Christ Himself and sustained by the Eucharist. Those who truly understand and value the Eucharist do not walk away from it. Call it what it is, not “seeing the light,” but turning away from it. Leaving the Catholic Church is synonymous with turning away from the Light.

Uche is a girl 🇻🇦

111,088 views • 3 months ago

Candles They are sending billionaires and pop stars into space while the planet burns and Americans ration their insulin. There are companies marketing AI lovers to lonely people and harvesting their data. Last night Israel bombed a tent camp in Gaza, and women and children burned alive. This is a strange, dark place. Strange, dark times in a strange, dark world. Light a candle for those who have died. Light a candle for those who are dead inside. Light a candle for those with algorithms in their eyes. Light a candle for those with AI in their souls. Light a candle for the screaming red children. Light a candle for the silent gray children. Light a candle for the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. Light a candle for the songs of the whales. Light a candle for the hearts like cast lead. Light a candle for the hearts like wallaby roadkill. Light a candle for the hearts like incense cathedrals. Light a candle for the hearts like wet skies. Light a candle for the eggs in our chests. Light a candle for the seeds in our heads. Light a candle for the mushroom cloud on the horizon. Light a candle for the sleeping Buddhas. I stand slack-jawed and dry-mouthed at a world I do not understand, hurtling toward a future I do not recognize. Firelight dances on my wall from the candles, or maybe from Gaza, or maybe from the biosphere, or maybe from just beneath my skin. Reading by Tim Foley.

Candles They are sending billionaires and pop stars into space while the planet burns and Americans ration their insulin. There are companies marketing AI lovers to lonely people and harvesting their data. Last night Israel bombed a tent camp in Gaza, and women and children burned alive. This is a strange, dark place. Strange, dark times in a strange, dark world. Light a candle for those who have died. Light a candle for those who are dead inside. Light a candle for those with algorithms in their eyes. Light a candle for those with AI in their souls. Light a candle for the screaming red children. Light a candle for the silent gray children. Light a candle for the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. Light a candle for the songs of the whales. Light a candle for the hearts like cast lead. Light a candle for the hearts like wallaby roadkill. Light a candle for the hearts like incense cathedrals. Light a candle for the hearts like wet skies. Light a candle for the eggs in our chests. Light a candle for the seeds in our heads. Light a candle for the mushroom cloud on the horizon. Light a candle for the sleeping Buddhas. I stand slack-jawed and dry-mouthed at a world I do not understand, hurtling toward a future I do not recognize. Firelight dances on my wall from the candles, or maybe from Gaza, or maybe from the biosphere, or maybe from just beneath my skin. Reading by Tim Foley.

Caitlin Johnstone

12,781 views • 1 year ago