ๆญฃๅœจๅŠ ่ฝฝ่ง†้ข‘...

่ง†้ข‘ๅŠ ่ฝฝๅคฑ่ดฅ

46,981 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 7 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰ โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 ๆก่ฏ„่ฎบ

ๆš‚ๆ— ่ฏ„่ฎบ

ๅŽŸๅง‹ๅธ–ๅญ็š„่ฏ„่ฎบๅฐ†ๆ˜พ็คบๅœจ่ฟ™้‡Œ

็›ธๅ…ณ่ง†้ข‘

โ€œOnly two stepsโ€ required to make Bitcoin quantum-resistant? In this Unchained episode, Matt Corallo ๐ŸŸ  joins me to discuss: โŒ Why he thinks Nic Carter is wrong about the quantum threat to Bitcoin โ›” Why he disagrees with Nic on his ranking of Bitcoinโ€™s most influential developers ๐Ÿ˜ฑ Why โ€œthe community at that timeโ€ will deal with the quantum threat ๐Ÿฅท Why making bitcoin post-quantum might require a block size increase ๐Ÿ”ฅ Why he believes โ€œyou burn old lost coins, you burn anyone who hasn't migratedโ€ Timestamps: ๐Ÿš€0:00 Introduction โš”๏ธ02:16 What Matt says Nic is getting wrong about the quantum threat to Bitcoin ๐Ÿค”08:59 What Matt says Bitcoin's quantum security roadmap could look like ๐Ÿซ 19:04 Do Bitcoin Core developers have any timelines? ๐Ÿคฏ29:34 Are there only two steps required to quantum-proof Bitcoin? ๐Ÿ“34:04 Matt weighs in on public comments from other Bitcoin developers on the quantum threat โ‰๏ธ47:37 Why Bitcoin Core has not announced a quantum team ๐Ÿ‘€53:57 Can BlackRock โ€œfireโ€ Bitcoin developers? ๐Ÿ’ซ58:07 What Matt says is the North Star for Bitcoin developers ๐Ÿ”ฅ1:07:42 What Matt thinks will happen to lost bitcoins ๐Ÿค”1:08:26 Is there any plan to secure Bitcoin against AI? ๐Ÿ‘€1:11:31 Will Bitcoin and Ethereum align on quantum security?

Laura Shin

19,795 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 4 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰