Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Question: If the U.S. does proceed to take territory from a sovereign nation who also is a NATO ally, Denmark, would that be the end of NATO? Rep. Gil Cisneros: “You know, it would be, and I think it would be the end of our constitution. Right. I think...

jimsciutto's profile picture

Jim Sciutto

526,250 subscribers

79,492 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Polish PM Tusk on Greenland: A conflict or an attempt to seize the territory of a state that is a NATO member by another NATO member — especially if it is the United States — would be the end of the world as we know. It'll be a catastrophe.
0:51

Polish PM Tusk on Greenland: A conflict or an attempt to seize the territory of a state that is a NATO member by another NATO member — especially if it is the United States — would be the end of the world as we know. It'll be a catastrophe.

Clash Report

198,682 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Bacon on Trump’s threats toward Greenland: I don’t think he’s going to do it. I think he’s doing it as a negotiating tactic—but you don’t negotiate with an ally by threatening force. I served in NATO. These guys are our friends. I think it would be the end of the administration.
0:58

Bacon on Trump’s threats toward Greenland: I don’t think he’s going to do it. I think he’s doing it as a negotiating tactic—but you don’t negotiate with an ally by threatening force. I served in NATO. These guys are our friends. I think it would be the end of the administration.

Acyn

283,884 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Polish Prime Minister Tusk on Greenland: "A conflict or an attempt to seize the territory of a NATO member state by another NATO member - especially if it's the United States - would be the end of the world as we know it. It would be a catastrophe."
0:51

Polish Prime Minister Tusk on Greenland: "A conflict or an attempt to seize the territory of a NATO member state by another NATO member - especially if it's the United States - would be the end of the world as we know it. It would be a catastrophe."

Sprinter Press

12,056 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Former VP Pence: “Military involvement, did you say? No. Denmark is a NATO ally. Despite some comments that have been made in the last few days, the fact is that a military assault against a NATO ally would require activation of Article II and every NATO ally would be called upon to either drop out of NATO or come to the defense of that country.”
1:29

Former VP Pence: “Military involvement, did you say? No. Denmark is a NATO ally. Despite some comments that have been made in the last few days, the fact is that a military assault against a NATO ally would require activation of Article II and every NATO ally would be called upon to either drop out of NATO or come to the defense of that country.”

Kaitlan Collins

672,502 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: Hirono: "Would you carry out an order from Trump to seize Greenland, the territory of our NATO ally Denmark, by force? Or would you comply with an order to take control of the Panama Canal?" Hegseth: "President Trump received 77 million votes to be the legitimate commander-in-chief."
1:07

🚨 BREAKING: Hirono: "Would you carry out an order from Trump to seize Greenland, the territory of our NATO ally Denmark, by force? Or would you comply with an order to take control of the Panama Canal?" Hegseth: "President Trump received 77 million votes to be the legitimate commander-in-chief."

GBC

39,708 просмотров • 12 дней назад

"There is a strong case to be made that by threatening the use of the American military against our NATO ally Denmark and saying — demanding — that they turn over this territory, ... you could say this marks in a way the effective end of NATO as we knew it,” said Susan Glasser.
2:12

"There is a strong case to be made that by threatening the use of the American military against our NATO ally Denmark and saying — demanding — that they turn over this territory, ... you could say this marks in a way the effective end of NATO as we knew it,” said Susan Glasser.

Washington Week with The Atlantic | PBS

73,127 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Question: Does Trump want to break the NATO alliance? John Bolton : “Look, on a good day, Trump is indifferent to NATO. He said again publicly within the past couple of weeks, this may be a choice between Greenland and NATO. I think for some of his advisers, it would be a twofer: take Greenland and lose NATO.”
0:27

Question: Does Trump want to break the NATO alliance? John Bolton : “Look, on a good day, Trump is indifferent to NATO. He said again publicly within the past couple of weeks, this may be a choice between Greenland and NATO. I think for some of his advisers, it would be a twofer: take Greenland and lose NATO.”

Jim Sciutto

42,016 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🇺🇸TUCKER: IF I WERE PRESIDENT, I'D PULL OUT OF NATO IMMEDIATELY "Look, the thing that Russia wants, and I think probably has a right to, is not to have NATO missiles on its border. I don't know why we would do that or what we get out of it. I just don't even understand it. I don't understand the purpose of NATO. I don't think NATO is good for the United States. I think it's an attack on our sovereignty. I would pull out of NATO immediately if I were the U.S president because I don't think it helps the U.S. I know a lot of people are getting their bread buttered by NATO." Source: Lex Fridman Podcast
0:26

🇺🇸TUCKER: IF I WERE PRESIDENT, I'D PULL OUT OF NATO IMMEDIATELY "Look, the thing that Russia wants, and I think probably has a right to, is not to have NATO missiles on its border. I don't know why we would do that or what we get out of it. I just don't even understand it. I don't understand the purpose of NATO. I don't think NATO is good for the United States. I think it's an attack on our sovereignty. I would pull out of NATO immediately if I were the U.S president because I don't think it helps the U.S. I know a lot of people are getting their bread buttered by NATO." Source: Lex Fridman Podcast

Mario Nawfal

168,905 просмотров • 2 лет назад

If President Trump ordered the annexation of Greenland, it would end NATO. He would be destroying the system that has reinforced American security for 80 years—and all for a vanity project, as I told Katie Couric
1:14

If President Trump ordered the annexation of Greenland, it would end NATO. He would be destroying the system that has reinforced American security for 80 years—and all for a vanity project, as I told Katie Couric

Michael McFaul

228,231 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇬🇱🇩🇪 "NATO to discuss the defense of Greenland if necessary" — German FM Johann Wadeful He added that Greenland is an integral part of Denmark and that every threat to annex the island to the US is causing concern among NATO allies NATO fighting NATO? Would that be result in an immediate collapse of the bloc?
0:33

🇺🇸🇬🇱🇩🇪 "NATO to discuss the defense of Greenland if necessary" — German FM Johann Wadeful He added that Greenland is an integral part of Denmark and that every threat to annex the island to the US is causing concern among NATO allies NATO fighting NATO? Would that be result in an immediate collapse of the bloc?

Lord Bebo

22,473 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸 🇬🇱 STEPHEN MILLER: GREENLAND SHOULD BE PART OF THE UNITED STATES... NOBODY WILL FIGHT US OVER IT White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller refused to take military action off the table for acquiring Greenland during a contentious CNN interview, dismissing Denmark's warnings that attacking a NATO ally would destroy the alliance. CNN: "Can you rule out that the U.S. is ever going to try to take Greenland by force?" Miller: "That is the formal position of the U.S. government since the beginning of this administration that Greenland should be part of the United States. It wouldn't be military action against Greenland. Greenland has a population of 30,000 people. The real question is, by what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? What is the basis of their territorial claim? What is their basis of having Greenland as a colony of Denmark? For the United States to secure the Arctic region, to protect NATO interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the United States." Source: CNN Stephen Miller
3:03

🚨🇺🇸 🇬🇱 STEPHEN MILLER: GREENLAND SHOULD BE PART OF THE UNITED STATES... NOBODY WILL FIGHT US OVER IT White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller refused to take military action off the table for acquiring Greenland during a contentious CNN interview, dismissing Denmark's warnings that attacking a NATO ally would destroy the alliance. CNN: "Can you rule out that the U.S. is ever going to try to take Greenland by force?" Miller: "That is the formal position of the U.S. government since the beginning of this administration that Greenland should be part of the United States. It wouldn't be military action against Greenland. Greenland has a population of 30,000 people. The real question is, by what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? What is the basis of their territorial claim? What is their basis of having Greenland as a colony of Denmark? For the United States to secure the Arctic region, to protect NATO interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the United States." Source: CNN Stephen Miller

Mario Nawfal

47,855 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

“That’s our territory” — Trump claims Greenland Donald Trump argues that Greenland cannot be secured by anyone other than the United States and calls it strategically American territory. He says Denmark proved incapable of defending Greenland in WWII, claims the island is part of North America, and insists only full U.S. ownership — not a lease — would allow real defence. Trump says he wants immediate talks on acquiring Greenland, argues this would strengthen NATO, and warns Europe: agreeing would be “appreciated”, refusing would be “remembered”.
0:08

“That’s our territory” — Trump claims Greenland Donald Trump argues that Greenland cannot be secured by anyone other than the United States and calls it strategically American territory. He says Denmark proved incapable of defending Greenland in WWII, claims the island is part of North America, and insists only full U.S. ownership — not a lease — would allow real defence. Trump says he wants immediate talks on acquiring Greenland, argues this would strengthen NATO, and warns Europe: agreeing would be “appreciated”, refusing would be “remembered”.

NEXTA

150,786 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

JUST IN: Greenland demands NATO's protection following President Donald Trump's comments that he plans on acquiring the territory one way or another. The statement was released by Greenland’s prime minister’s office. "The United States has once again reiterated its desire to take over Greenland," the statement said. "This is something the government coalition in Greenland cannot accept under any circumstances." "Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark. As a part of the Realm, Greenland is a member of NATO, and the defense of Greenland must therefore be ensured through NATO." Trump recently stated that Greenland would be acquired the "easy way" or the "hard way." "I would like to make a deal the easy way, but if we don’t do it the easy way, we’re going to do it the hard way. And I am a fan of Denmark."
1:26

JUST IN: Greenland demands NATO's protection following President Donald Trump's comments that he plans on acquiring the territory one way or another. The statement was released by Greenland’s prime minister’s office. "The United States has once again reiterated its desire to take over Greenland," the statement said. "This is something the government coalition in Greenland cannot accept under any circumstances." "Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark. As a part of the Realm, Greenland is a member of NATO, and the defense of Greenland must therefore be ensured through NATO." Trump recently stated that Greenland would be acquired the "easy way" or the "hard way." "I would like to make a deal the easy way, but if we don’t do it the easy way, we’re going to do it the hard way. And I am a fan of Denmark."

Collin Rugg

951,789 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Sir Ed Davey: 'Does the PM agree that if Trump does attack Greenland, it will be the end of NATO? ' Sir Keir Starmer: He [Ed Davey] keeps encouraging me to tug away at parts of NATO, and to choose between Europe and the US. That would be a strategic mistake for the UK
2:05

Sir Ed Davey: 'Does the PM agree that if Trump does attack Greenland, it will be the end of NATO? ' Sir Keir Starmer: He [Ed Davey] keeps encouraging me to tug away at parts of NATO, and to choose between Europe and the US. That would be a strategic mistake for the UK

Sky News

83,507 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Baier: You don’t think the US is going to invade Greenland do you? Foreign Minister Rasmussen: No, at least I do not hope so, that would be the end of NATO.
1:50

Baier: You don’t think the US is going to invade Greenland do you? Foreign Minister Rasmussen: No, at least I do not hope so, that would be the end of NATO.

Acyn

257,489 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

An attempt to “annex” Greenland would be the functional end of NATO. And final evidence that Trump is permanently distracted by things that have nothing to do with the American people - like Venezuela, his new White House ball room, and now Greenland.
1:04

An attempt to “annex” Greenland would be the functional end of NATO. And final evidence that Trump is permanently distracted by things that have nothing to do with the American people - like Venezuela, his new White House ball room, and now Greenland.

Chris Murphy 🟧

105,994 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад