Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Quick correction, it wasn’t Ivan, but let’s not pretend this was random. This looked coordinated. You can literally hear them checking the shot like it’s a production. “You got it?” “Got it.” Then the theatrics like they’re fighting for something. All in the name of “protecting children.” Meanwhile, the... show more

NΛTLY DΞNISΞ

62,909 subscribers

23,911 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 SOMETHING STRANGE IS HAPPENING TO THE MOON — AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO NOTICE A woman gets on camera and says this isn’t a one-time thing. She saw it last month, the moon looked completely off, like the orientation made no sense, but she brushed it off and kept it moving. Now it’s happening again. Same exact look. So this time she actually checks, pulls up NASA charts for her exact location and shows what the moon is supposed to look like… and what she’s seeing doesn’t match it, not even close. The charts show it side to side, but what everyone actually saw was a flipped moon, straight up upside down, like something changed and everyone’s acting like it didn’t. Then she calls people across the country to verify it, and they come back saying the same thing. It looks upside down to them too, which is where this stops being “just her” and starts feeling like the same exact thing showing up in multiple places at the same time. And it’s not just her, people all over social media are saying the same thing: "Something isn't right." And this is where it stops making any sense. She says if the moon is a crescent, you’re only supposed to see the lit part… so why can she still see the entire outline of it, faint but clearly there, like the shadow isn’t even doing what it’s supposed to do? And she’s already calling it out before anyone can spin it: don’t say it’s lighting, don’t say it’s angle, don’t say it’s photoshopped, because she checked the charts, showed the receipts, and had other people confirm it. So now you’ve got the same “flip,” the same upside down moon, same visibility issue, second month in a row, multiple locations… and it still doesn’t match what we’re being shown. She ignored it once. Now it’s back again. So what exactly are we looking at… and why does it feel like we’re not supposed to question it?

🚨 SOMETHING STRANGE IS HAPPENING TO THE MOON — AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO NOTICE A woman gets on camera and says this isn’t a one-time thing. She saw it last month, the moon looked completely off, like the orientation made no sense, but she brushed it off and kept it moving. Now it’s happening again. Same exact look. So this time she actually checks, pulls up NASA charts for her exact location and shows what the moon is supposed to look like… and what she’s seeing doesn’t match it, not even close. The charts show it side to side, but what everyone actually saw was a flipped moon, straight up upside down, like something changed and everyone’s acting like it didn’t. Then she calls people across the country to verify it, and they come back saying the same thing. It looks upside down to them too, which is where this stops being “just her” and starts feeling like the same exact thing showing up in multiple places at the same time. And it’s not just her, people all over social media are saying the same thing: "Something isn't right." And this is where it stops making any sense. She says if the moon is a crescent, you’re only supposed to see the lit part… so why can she still see the entire outline of it, faint but clearly there, like the shadow isn’t even doing what it’s supposed to do? And she’s already calling it out before anyone can spin it: don’t say it’s lighting, don’t say it’s angle, don’t say it’s photoshopped, because she checked the charts, showed the receipts, and had other people confirm it. So now you’ve got the same “flip,” the same upside down moon, same visibility issue, second month in a row, multiple locations… and it still doesn’t match what we’re being shown. She ignored it once. Now it’s back again. So what exactly are we looking at… and why does it feel like we’re not supposed to question it?

HustleBitch

730,630 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Chanhyuk: Company doesn’t matter, but it’s about the people you work with. “There’s also something like this. Even though we say we created a “company,” we just used that word because it’s easier for people to understand. But in the end, it’s not really about the company, it’s about the people. Like, who you work with. And what kind of experiences you share with them, that’s what really matters the most. So with these people, whether we go, volunteering or travel somewhere, we always move together as one group. Because if not and later on, when I write and release a song, if we hadn’t shared those experiences, I’d have to explain everything. Like, “I went somewhere and had this kind of experience…” But since we’ve all lived it together, I can just say, “Hey, I wrote this kind of song this time,” and they’ll be like, “Oh, yeah, I get it. I know exactly what that is.” It just makes everything so much faster, right?”

Chanhyuk: Company doesn’t matter, but it’s about the people you work with. “There’s also something like this. Even though we say we created a “company,” we just used that word because it’s easier for people to understand. But in the end, it’s not really about the company, it’s about the people. Like, who you work with. And what kind of experiences you share with them, that’s what really matters the most. So with these people, whether we go, volunteering or travel somewhere, we always move together as one group. Because if not and later on, when I write and release a song, if we hadn’t shared those experiences, I’d have to explain everything. Like, “I went somewhere and had this kind of experience…” But since we’ve all lived it together, I can just say, “Hey, I wrote this kind of song this time,” and they’ll be like, “Oh, yeah, I get it. I know exactly what that is.” It just makes everything so much faster, right?”

akmerch ⚔️

194,243 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Nick Fuentes wonders if people like Ian Carroll and Tucker Carlson are part of a layered conspiracy that avoids a certain topic. “I watched Ian Carroll interview with Tucker Carlson and I didn’t hear any mention of this.” “The stuff about Jeffrey Epstein, this is actually there. It’s not coded, it’s not ambiguous, it is staring you in the face. And what it is, is this is the essence of organized jewry working in America, working in society.” “That’s the part that no one wants to say out loud…whether it’s Ehud Barak or Netanyahu, they’re part of the same thing. Whether it’s Ronald Lauder or George Soros, they’re in effect part of the same thing. And that thing is called world jewry, organized jewry. Yes, it is the jews. No they are not Pagan Gypsies, not Khazarians, they’re not Frankists, they’re not neocons, they’re not just Zionists. It is organized jewry. That is what created Jeffrey Epstein, that is what sustained Jeffrey Epstein, and that is who Jeffrey Epstein worked on behalf of.” “What unites them together is not their love of pedophilia or their worship of satan. What unites them is their jewish identity.”

Nick Fuentes wonders if people like Ian Carroll and Tucker Carlson are part of a layered conspiracy that avoids a certain topic. “I watched Ian Carroll interview with Tucker Carlson and I didn’t hear any mention of this.” “The stuff about Jeffrey Epstein, this is actually there. It’s not coded, it’s not ambiguous, it is staring you in the face. And what it is, is this is the essence of organized jewry working in America, working in society.” “That’s the part that no one wants to say out loud…whether it’s Ehud Barak or Netanyahu, they’re part of the same thing. Whether it’s Ronald Lauder or George Soros, they’re in effect part of the same thing. And that thing is called world jewry, organized jewry. Yes, it is the jews. No they are not Pagan Gypsies, not Khazarians, they’re not Frankists, they’re not neocons, they’re not just Zionists. It is organized jewry. That is what created Jeffrey Epstein, that is what sustained Jeffrey Epstein, and that is who Jeffrey Epstein worked on behalf of.” “What unites them together is not their love of pedophilia or their worship of satan. What unites them is their jewish identity.”

Fractured Light

171,989 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🐶 i actually asked the company staff about this today.. i asked them, “are artists not allowed to use the word streaming? is it something we’re not supposed to say?” and they told me, “it’s not that you can’t say it, it’s just that artists don’t usually use that kind of wording.” so i was like, “it’s not that i’m trying to tell them what to do, i just want to thank them for streaming.. then how am i supposed to say it?” and they told me that i can say it if i want, so that’s why i’m saying it now. 🐶 🙏 thank you, everyone. thank you so much for doing it. thank you from the bottom of my heart 🙇🏻

🐶 i actually asked the company staff about this today.. i asked them, “are artists not allowed to use the word streaming? is it something we’re not supposed to say?” and they told me, “it’s not that you can’t say it, it’s just that artists don’t usually use that kind of wording.” so i was like, “it’s not that i’m trying to tell them what to do, i just want to thank them for streaming.. then how am i supposed to say it?” and they told me that i can say it if i want, so that’s why i’m saying it now. 🐶 🙏 thank you, everyone. thank you so much for doing it. thank you from the bottom of my heart 🙇🏻

노이

247,561 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

“I taught 'em 'bout fishscale, they want me to fish for them, They want me to catch, clean, then cook up a dish for them, All of this just for them or they got a diss for him, They want me to disappear like it's gon' shift for them, They say that I'm in the way, they want me to sit for them, But what they admitting is they ain't got shit for him, And really the fact is, we not in the same bracket? Not in the same league, don't shoot at the same baskets, Don't pay the same taxes, hang with the same bitches, So how am I in the way, what is it I'm missing?”

“I taught 'em 'bout fishscale, they want me to fish for them, They want me to catch, clean, then cook up a dish for them, All of this just for them or they got a diss for him, They want me to disappear like it's gon' shift for them, They say that I'm in the way, they want me to sit for them, But what they admitting is they ain't got shit for him, And really the fact is, we not in the same bracket? Not in the same league, don't shoot at the same baskets, Don't pay the same taxes, hang with the same bitches, So how am I in the way, what is it I'm missing?”

💎🍾

118,321 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Joe Rogan speaks on the new Jeffrey Epstein files coverup “Why would your name be redacted if you're not a victim? Like this is what's crazy about all this. Like how come you redact some people and you don't redact other people? Like what is this? This is not good. None of this is good for this administration. It looks f*cking terrible. It looks terrible.” “This is definitely not a hoax. And if you got redacted people's names and these people aren't victims, you're not protecting the victim. So what are you doing? — How come all this is not released?“

Joe Rogan speaks on the new Jeffrey Epstein files coverup “Why would your name be redacted if you're not a victim? Like this is what's crazy about all this. Like how come you redact some people and you don't redact other people? Like what is this? This is not good. None of this is good for this administration. It looks f*cking terrible. It looks terrible.” “This is definitely not a hoax. And if you got redacted people's names and these people aren't victims, you're not protecting the victim. So what are you doing? — How come all this is not released?“

Wall Street Apes

65,572 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

BANNON: You can’t take this passively. The excuse to say, “Well, these are blue states now” is not going to hack it. Of course, NJ is a blue state, but it was trending our way and we got smoked. Yes, the Scott Pressler/TPUSA effort is important, and it’s got to continue on. But that’s not going to get these victories. It’s getting them out on game day. You’ve got to give them a reason to get out. We don’t need pats on the head. We need maniacal focus. Focus, focus, focus. And you have to confront Mamdani. You have to confront Newsom. If you don’t confront them, they’re going to run the tables on you. These people know how to play smash mouth. It’s not time for a pat on the head and “Oh, it’s all going to be fine.” It ain’t going to be fine unless you turn around and make it fine.

BANNON: You can’t take this passively. The excuse to say, “Well, these are blue states now” is not going to hack it. Of course, NJ is a blue state, but it was trending our way and we got smoked. Yes, the Scott Pressler/TPUSA effort is important, and it’s got to continue on. But that’s not going to get these victories. It’s getting them out on game day. You’ve got to give them a reason to get out. We don’t need pats on the head. We need maniacal focus. Focus, focus, focus. And you have to confront Mamdani. You have to confront Newsom. If you don’t confront them, they’re going to run the tables on you. These people know how to play smash mouth. It’s not time for a pat on the head and “Oh, it’s all going to be fine.” It ain’t going to be fine unless you turn around and make it fine.

Grace Chong, MBI

2,289,807 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

BOYCOTT William Hill !!!!! So according to William Hill. Lukas Hornicek DIDN’T save this shot from Vicenzo Grifo. Even though- 1. You can clearly see he gets fingertips to it 2. His fingers bend back AFTER touching the ball 3. The ball then slightly changes direction and goes onto the post 4. You even hear the commentators say the keeper got fingertips to it to save it onto the post They even told me if I prove it they’ll escalate it but won’t accept my video as proof 😂😂😂 Even though William Hill and most betting companies state “any shot that is touched onto the post is a shot on target” they’re denying this is a shot on target and even said “the bet wasn’t settled on video footage” I’ve sent them all the proof they need to see it’s a shot on target that the keeper touches onto the post which according to their rules is a shot on target and a save. They’ve not settled this as a save or a shot on target even though he clearly tips it onto the post. They even tried to bend their own rules saying if a keeper tips it onto the post then it’s a “shot” and not a “shot on target” which is a lie They even paid out part of the bet and said “WON” so if they’re adamant it didn’t win then why did they partly pay out ? 😂 It either won or it didn’t win. The fact they’re denying the keeper saved this has meant I didn’t win and I’ll never use them again unless this is resolved. Seen so many tweets like this recently where betting companies are ignoring factual evidence in videos to deny people of their winnings but happy enough to take money straight away off people So do not use William Hill as when you show them proof they deny it, break their own rules and scam customers out of paying them

BOYCOTT William Hill !!!!! So according to William Hill. Lukas Hornicek DIDN’T save this shot from Vicenzo Grifo. Even though- 1. You can clearly see he gets fingertips to it 2. His fingers bend back AFTER touching the ball 3. The ball then slightly changes direction and goes onto the post 4. You even hear the commentators say the keeper got fingertips to it to save it onto the post They even told me if I prove it they’ll escalate it but won’t accept my video as proof 😂😂😂 Even though William Hill and most betting companies state “any shot that is touched onto the post is a shot on target” they’re denying this is a shot on target and even said “the bet wasn’t settled on video footage” I’ve sent them all the proof they need to see it’s a shot on target that the keeper touches onto the post which according to their rules is a shot on target and a save. They’ve not settled this as a save or a shot on target even though he clearly tips it onto the post. They even tried to bend their own rules saying if a keeper tips it onto the post then it’s a “shot” and not a “shot on target” which is a lie They even paid out part of the bet and said “WON” so if they’re adamant it didn’t win then why did they partly pay out ? 😂 It either won or it didn’t win. The fact they’re denying the keeper saved this has meant I didn’t win and I’ll never use them again unless this is resolved. Seen so many tweets like this recently where betting companies are ignoring factual evidence in videos to deny people of their winnings but happy enough to take money straight away off people So do not use William Hill as when you show them proof they deny it, break their own rules and scam customers out of paying them

Rangers Spares

61,879 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 Greg Gutfeld gives a REALITY CHECK on the Supreme Court Ruling: “It doesn’t block the system of tariffs, it just adjusts the leverage. It’s all about leverage.” “For the people that are gloating, they are probably the same people who backed the student loan bailout. They can STFU, the Supreme Court pooped on that but it didn’t stop Biden did it?!” “Tariffs are not an emotional thing to us. It’s just a tool. But because it’s an emotional thing for Dems, they’re like ‘this is so great’ but this is just another day. We’re still gonna get it whether you like it or not!” says GregGutfeld

🚨 Greg Gutfeld gives a REALITY CHECK on the Supreme Court Ruling: “It doesn’t block the system of tariffs, it just adjusts the leverage. It’s all about leverage.” “For the people that are gloating, they are probably the same people who backed the student loan bailout. They can STFU, the Supreme Court pooped on that but it didn’t stop Biden did it?!” “Tariffs are not an emotional thing to us. It’s just a tool. But because it’s an emotional thing for Dems, they’re like ‘this is so great’ but this is just another day. We’re still gonna get it whether you like it or not!” says GregGutfeld

TV News Now

174,884 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

These same libs who have said for years that Charlie Kirk is a fascist are now literally crying? It shows you they don’t actually believe anything they say. It’s a game to them. They’re all in the same club and friends behind the scenes and the do this shit all for show with no care about who it harms in the process.

These same libs who have said for years that Charlie Kirk is a fascist are now literally crying? It shows you they don’t actually believe anything they say. It’s a game to them. They’re all in the same club and friends behind the scenes and the do this shit all for show with no care about who it harms in the process.

B L A K E L E Y™℠©® LLC

1,188,169 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Scarface is widely regarded as a classic today, but when it first came out, the reception was brutal. Steven Bauer, who played Manny, says it was so painful that for years he and Al Pacino barely even spoke about the film. He explains… “Scarface is great to be a part of now. For years, it was dismal - like everybody associated with Scarface was a leper - people got very wimpy about Scarface really quickly. As soon as the reviews were out… Our peers came to see the movie in the premiere, right? There were two premieres, one in New York, one in LA, and people came to see it and they were like, ‘Wow, what a movie…. The next day, the reviews are out, and all the papers — this is before the internet, okay? - so you get just the conventional news media outlets - and 90% of them gave Scarface a horrible review. Like horrible, really, really insulting, injurious stuff. Personal attacks on Pacino and Brian De Palma, the director, and on Oliver, the writer... It was really, really mean because the country was going through a politically correct sort of thing - they were like, "This is like a new wave of violence in the movies, oh!" It’s nice because when I see Al - we can finally talk about it, because...for years, we couldn’t even talk about it. We’d be like, “Oh yeah, Scarface, yeah, yeah...” It was so sad! Because the movie was so great! And then it was like this thud, and it lasted like 10 years… Anywhere I’d go, it was like, ‘You’re that guy who was really good in that really terrible movie.’ And I’d be like, ‘How could you say that?’ And they’d go, ‘Well, you were good.’ And I’m like, ‘Okay, but I don’t care. What about the movie?’ And they go, ‘Oh, come on, you gotta admit it. It was like way over the top. It was like so exaggerating,’ blah, blah, blah, blah.…and I’d be like, ‘You’re a pussy!”

Scarface is widely regarded as a classic today, but when it first came out, the reception was brutal. Steven Bauer, who played Manny, says it was so painful that for years he and Al Pacino barely even spoke about the film. He explains… “Scarface is great to be a part of now. For years, it was dismal - like everybody associated with Scarface was a leper - people got very wimpy about Scarface really quickly. As soon as the reviews were out… Our peers came to see the movie in the premiere, right? There were two premieres, one in New York, one in LA, and people came to see it and they were like, ‘Wow, what a movie…. The next day, the reviews are out, and all the papers — this is before the internet, okay? - so you get just the conventional news media outlets - and 90% of them gave Scarface a horrible review. Like horrible, really, really insulting, injurious stuff. Personal attacks on Pacino and Brian De Palma, the director, and on Oliver, the writer... It was really, really mean because the country was going through a politically correct sort of thing - they were like, "This is like a new wave of violence in the movies, oh!" It’s nice because when I see Al - we can finally talk about it, because...for years, we couldn’t even talk about it. We’d be like, “Oh yeah, Scarface, yeah, yeah...” It was so sad! Because the movie was so great! And then it was like this thud, and it lasted like 10 years… Anywhere I’d go, it was like, ‘You’re that guy who was really good in that really terrible movie.’ And I’d be like, ‘How could you say that?’ And they’d go, ‘Well, you were good.’ And I’m like, ‘Okay, but I don’t care. What about the movie?’ And they go, ‘Oh, come on, you gotta admit it. It was like way over the top. It was like so exaggerating,’ blah, blah, blah, blah.…and I’d be like, ‘You’re a pussy!”

Gangster Cinema Central

427,628 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Joe Bird on 'LEVITICUS': "What the script talks about is that this entity is this metaphor for homophobia, and sometimes only the victim will see it. Everyone else is just like, 'Oh, you'll be fine, that's not real.' But the truth is, it can hurt people, it can kill people. I think what's good with horror is you can hide in that situation to confront an audience — to kind of prove that point."

Joe Bird on 'LEVITICUS': "What the script talks about is that this entity is this metaphor for homophobia, and sometimes only the victim will see it. Everyone else is just like, 'Oh, you'll be fine, that's not real.' But the truth is, it can hurt people, it can kill people. I think what's good with horror is you can hide in that situation to confront an audience — to kind of prove that point."

Film Updates

62,855 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

It’s painfully obvious this guy has no idea what he’s talking about. He’s acting like he just discovered fire because he spent a few hours sitting with the leftover scraps of the IRGC and now thinks he’s in the room where it all goes down. Let’s be clear: the Islamic Republic of Iran, as it exists today, under this name and this exact power structure, is never going to be integrated into the global economy. Not now! Not ever! It won’t be a partner. It won’t behave like a normal state. It simply can’t. Its DNA is fundamentally broken. This idea was born in crisis, and it survives on crisis. Crisis isn’t a flaw, it’s the business model. A regime that can’t even make peace with its own people, isn’t about to reach some grand understanding with those it calls enemies. It doesn’t want to, and even in some hypothetical scenario where it suddenly did, it doesn’t have the capacity. This isn’t a policy gap. It’s structural. Permanent. Nothing about this structure is normal. It has spent decades paying enormous costs to stay exactly on this path, because it knows that deviating from its ideological foundation is existential suicide. That’s not something you can negotiate away. And yet, some Americans keep falling for the same illusion, the same delusion that, before the Iranian Revolution, led them to believe Ruhollah Khomeini was just a backward cleric they could influence. The CIA flew to Neauphle-le-Château, sat across from him, and walked away thinking he wasn’t that dangerous. They were dead wrong then, and anyone making the same mistake today is just as delusional.

It’s painfully obvious this guy has no idea what he’s talking about. He’s acting like he just discovered fire because he spent a few hours sitting with the leftover scraps of the IRGC and now thinks he’s in the room where it all goes down. Let’s be clear: the Islamic Republic of Iran, as it exists today, under this name and this exact power structure, is never going to be integrated into the global economy. Not now! Not ever! It won’t be a partner. It won’t behave like a normal state. It simply can’t. Its DNA is fundamentally broken. This idea was born in crisis, and it survives on crisis. Crisis isn’t a flaw, it’s the business model. A regime that can’t even make peace with its own people, isn’t about to reach some grand understanding with those it calls enemies. It doesn’t want to, and even in some hypothetical scenario where it suddenly did, it doesn’t have the capacity. This isn’t a policy gap. It’s structural. Permanent. Nothing about this structure is normal. It has spent decades paying enormous costs to stay exactly on this path, because it knows that deviating from its ideological foundation is existential suicide. That’s not something you can negotiate away. And yet, some Americans keep falling for the same illusion, the same delusion that, before the Iranian Revolution, led them to believe Ruhollah Khomeini was just a backward cleric they could influence. The CIA flew to Neauphle-le-Château, sat across from him, and walked away thinking he wasn’t that dangerous. They were dead wrong then, and anyone making the same mistake today is just as delusional.

Ehsan AriaN

37,715 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I’ve been following this phenomenon for a while. I have no idea what to make of it but when you see the sky get that black at 3:30 in the afternoon on a sunny day AND you hear what sounds like loud trumpets in the sky…It means something.. I’m not sure what. I don’t know if it’s biblical or if it’s something our government is doing, but I know what it sounds like to me . It’s been happening all over the world . I’d love to hear your opinions on this.

I’ve been following this phenomenon for a while. I have no idea what to make of it but when you see the sky get that black at 3:30 in the afternoon on a sunny day AND you hear what sounds like loud trumpets in the sky…It means something.. I’m not sure what. I don’t know if it’s biblical or if it’s something our government is doing, but I know what it sounds like to me . It’s been happening all over the world . I’d love to hear your opinions on this.

Leah Rain ✝️🇺🇸🎸🏝️

22,670 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk on the Next-Gen Tesla Roadster: “It has a shot at being the most memorable product unveil, ever. Hopefully in a couple of months (it will be unveiled), we need to make sure that it works. This is some crazy, crazy technology we got in this car. CRAZY, technology. Is it even a car? I’m not sure— it looks like a car. Let’s just put it this way, it’s crazier than anything from James Bond. If you took all the James Bond Cars and combined them, it’s crazier than it.”

Elon Musk on the Next-Gen Tesla Roadster: “It has a shot at being the most memorable product unveil, ever. Hopefully in a couple of months (it will be unveiled), we need to make sure that it works. This is some crazy, crazy technology we got in this car. CRAZY, technology. Is it even a car? I’m not sure— it looks like a car. Let’s just put it this way, it’s crazier than anything from James Bond. If you took all the James Bond Cars and combined them, it’s crazier than it.”

Nic Cruz Patane

26,785 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Andrew Tate: ”The average White family has a different approach towards their financial stability and their emotional investments towards children. Third worlders will just have kids; they won’t say, “Can I afford to have this kid?” They will just have kids. When you let them into a country you have to be prepared for them to have more children than the native population. They will outbreed the natives. If you let in 10% of third worlders it is 10% for a while but not for long. The only possible end result of this is the absolute replacement of the native population. Which then begs the question: is a country a place on the map and a name or is a country the people who live in it? I would argue that if you replace all the British people with people from somewhere else it doesn’t become Britain anymore. If you took all the Norwegians and replaced them with Indians, would it be Norway? I don’t think it would be.” He is right.

Andrew Tate: ”The average White family has a different approach towards their financial stability and their emotional investments towards children. Third worlders will just have kids; they won’t say, “Can I afford to have this kid?” They will just have kids. When you let them into a country you have to be prepared for them to have more children than the native population. They will outbreed the natives. If you let in 10% of third worlders it is 10% for a while but not for long. The only possible end result of this is the absolute replacement of the native population. Which then begs the question: is a country a place on the map and a name or is a country the people who live in it? I would argue that if you replace all the British people with people from somewhere else it doesn’t become Britain anymore. If you took all the Norwegians and replaced them with Indians, would it be Norway? I don’t think it would be.” He is right.

Taya Bass

559,396 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten