Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Quick Educational Thread 👇🧵 Aggregated Bucketed Delta. Instead of one aggregated delta, you break it down by trade size. Now you can see: • Small players ($1K–$100K) • Mid size ($100K–$500K) • Large players ($500K–$1M+) • Whales ($1M–$5M+) What this chart shows: ➡️ The initial move down Aggression came... show more

MMT

21,811 subscribers

11,483 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Gilbert Arenas says Chet Holmgren shouldn’t have made the All-Star team “Nothing against Chet but 17,8,7. Yeah your team is number one. We get it. But it’s a third option. It’s a third option player, right? It’s like, please get the first option players first, then you can move on to option twos, then threes. That’s exactly what Kawhi Leonard is doing, right? James Harden, right? The names that people want to go see. Not the third person that don’t get any focal point of nothing. You are not an All-Star player right now. You’re on the best team in the NBA and you’re doing okay, but you’re not dominating. You’re not like, you know, for most part, you’re playing an up and down. I don’t want to take his All-Star away from him, but this is why these are the reasons why players don’t play hard in it. You don’t put the real players in there” (Via Gilbert Arenas)

Gilbert Arenas says Chet Holmgren shouldn’t have made the All-Star team “Nothing against Chet but 17,8,7. Yeah your team is number one. We get it. But it’s a third option. It’s a third option player, right? It’s like, please get the first option players first, then you can move on to option twos, then threes. That’s exactly what Kawhi Leonard is doing, right? James Harden, right? The names that people want to go see. Not the third person that don’t get any focal point of nothing. You are not an All-Star player right now. You’re on the best team in the NBA and you’re doing okay, but you’re not dominating. You’re not like, you know, for most part, you’re playing an up and down. I don’t want to take his All-Star away from him, but this is why these are the reasons why players don’t play hard in it. You don’t put the real players in there” (Via Gilbert Arenas)

NBA Courtside

241,581 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Qullamaggie on Why You Shouldn’t Take Low Quality Trades With Smaller Size “One more thing that’s really important: why you shouldn’t size down. You know, just to trade some good setup on an illiquid stock or a stock that is too illiquid for your account size. What you do is condition your brain to trade with smaller positions and smaller risk numbers. And when you get a good opportunity, like a big opportunity on a more liquid stock, you won’t have the confidence to take the correct size because you’ve spent a bunch of time conditioning your brain to trade smaller for no reason other reason than you can sit on your two hands and wait for a more liquid opportunity. You need to get out of the game and out of this mentality. You have to trade everything all the time; that’s not how trading works. Yes, in the past 12 months, it has worked like that, but once this main trend ends, you don’t know when it will end. It is going to end, and there are going to be slimmer opportunities.”

Qullamaggie on Why You Shouldn’t Take Low Quality Trades With Smaller Size “One more thing that’s really important: why you shouldn’t size down. You know, just to trade some good setup on an illiquid stock or a stock that is too illiquid for your account size. What you do is condition your brain to trade with smaller positions and smaller risk numbers. And when you get a good opportunity, like a big opportunity on a more liquid stock, you won’t have the confidence to take the correct size because you’ve spent a bunch of time conditioning your brain to trade smaller for no reason other reason than you can sit on your two hands and wait for a more liquid opportunity. You need to get out of the game and out of this mentality. You have to trade everything all the time; that’s not how trading works. Yes, in the past 12 months, it has worked like that, but once this main trend ends, you don’t know when it will end. It is going to end, and there are going to be slimmer opportunities.”

Lone

19,808 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Qullamaggie’s Amazing Motivational Talk "Here is where I started trading. May 2011. Ever since I started reading or listening or watching financial media. All of these bears they always talk about what can go wrong, but no one ever talks about what can go right. We had a correction in 2015 and 2016, and yes there will be eventually a bear market. But what good is it to call a bear market if you’re wrong for five years? For 10 years? It’s just so stupid. Only thing one really needs to do is follow the price; all these worthless opinions, all the experts and these people - no one really knows anything. I’ve never traded this much size before. Like 3, 4 million dollar positions, so that’s kind of exhausting. But this was a good experience because now that’s how you take your trading to a new level; you have to force yourself to push size and get used to big PnL swings, you know. I see a lot of successful traders on Twitter - but they cannot push their size like they trade the same size they were trading 5, 7 years ago. They’re so deep in their comfort zone. Every year I want to increase my size, every year I want to get better, and bigger, and I’ve done it successfully for many years now. Personally, I just want to push my size to infinity, you know. That’s the only way. You have to push yourself.

Qullamaggie’s Amazing Motivational Talk "Here is where I started trading. May 2011. Ever since I started reading or listening or watching financial media. All of these bears they always talk about what can go wrong, but no one ever talks about what can go right. We had a correction in 2015 and 2016, and yes there will be eventually a bear market. But what good is it to call a bear market if you’re wrong for five years? For 10 years? It’s just so stupid. Only thing one really needs to do is follow the price; all these worthless opinions, all the experts and these people - no one really knows anything. I’ve never traded this much size before. Like 3, 4 million dollar positions, so that’s kind of exhausting. But this was a good experience because now that’s how you take your trading to a new level; you have to force yourself to push size and get used to big PnL swings, you know. I see a lot of successful traders on Twitter - but they cannot push their size like they trade the same size they were trading 5, 7 years ago. They’re so deep in their comfort zone. Every year I want to increase my size, every year I want to get better, and bigger, and I’ve done it successfully for many years now. Personally, I just want to push my size to infinity, you know. That’s the only way. You have to push yourself.

Lone

21,517 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

$XRP HOLDERS LISTEN HERE! 🚨 They want you scared now… because they know where $XRP is going This chart is not just history, it’s proof that patience pays off. $10,000 in XRP in 2016 turned into over $2.7 million. Not because of luck. But because someone held while the market tried to shake them out. Remember, before every explosive move, they manipulate the price. They trigger fear, dump hard, and watch retail run for the exits. That’s when the real players buy. Quietly. Aggressively. Without panic. I’ve seen this play out before. It’s not the first time. And it won’t be the last. Zoom out. Look at the macro. The tech. The real adoption curve. We’re just getting started. Don't let short-term emotion steal long-term wealth. This chart was the first wave. The next one will be bigger. Hold the line. Repost and follow me if you see what’s coming. 👇

$XRP HOLDERS LISTEN HERE! 🚨 They want you scared now… because they know where $XRP is going This chart is not just history, it’s proof that patience pays off. $10,000 in XRP in 2016 turned into over $2.7 million. Not because of luck. But because someone held while the market tried to shake them out. Remember, before every explosive move, they manipulate the price. They trigger fear, dump hard, and watch retail run for the exits. That’s when the real players buy. Quietly. Aggressively. Without panic. I’ve seen this play out before. It’s not the first time. And it won’t be the last. Zoom out. Look at the macro. The tech. The real adoption curve. We’re just getting started. Don't let short-term emotion steal long-term wealth. This chart was the first wave. The next one will be bigger. Hold the line. Repost and follow me if you see what’s coming. 👇

X Finance Bull

499,929 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

People all over the world are, rightly, growing more uncertain about the future—particularly when it comes to their finances and the economy. Just this week, banks in the U.S. made a surprise move that could spell disaster. On top of this, all signs point to continued escalations in the Middle East, particularly indicated by what organizations like JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs are predicting. But, there is a silver lining. We are aware of it. We can see where all of this is heading. And there is something that we can do about it. Dr. Kirk Elliott is a leading economist and precious metals dealer. You can find out more by visiting He joins us now to break this all down.

People all over the world are, rightly, growing more uncertain about the future—particularly when it comes to their finances and the economy. Just this week, banks in the U.S. made a surprise move that could spell disaster. On top of this, all signs point to continued escalations in the Middle East, particularly indicated by what organizations like JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs are predicting. But, there is a silver lining. We are aware of it. We can see where all of this is heading. And there is something that we can do about it. Dr. Kirk Elliott is a leading economist and precious metals dealer. You can find out more by visiting He joins us now to break this all down.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

102,972 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Why does price reverse the second you enter? Because you're reacting to micro structure shifts while institutions are still executing the macro trend. Every market operates in 2 ranges simultaneously: 1) External range (macro structure) 2) Internal range (micro structure) Every market is always operating within BOTH ranges simultaneously. 1) External Ranges How do you identify it? Look at the SIZE of the pullbacks. If one pullback is twice the size of the others—that's your external break of structure. What does it tell you? Your overall bias. If the external range is bearish, you should be looking for sells. If it's bullish, you should be looking for buys. The external range doesn't tell you when NOT to trade—it tells you WHAT DIRECTION to trade. 2) Internal Ranges How do you identify it? Look for small breaks of structure that happen WITHIN your external range. These are the tiny pullbacks that barely move price compared to the major swings. What does it tell you? Short-term trading opportunities. You CAN trade internal breaks, but manage your expectations. These aren't trend reversals—they're temporary counter-moves that create pullbacks before price continues with the external trend. The internal range tells you when there's a short-term trade setup, but NOT to expect a full reversal. In the video below, I've explained what happens when you trade internal breaks without identifying the external ranges (and how to solve this): — This is just one concept from my complete trading framework. We also cover how to identify when external structure is actually shifting, the 3 timeframes every trader needs to understand and how to identify discount zones for entry points. Just comment "RANGES" and the full breakdown will automatically be DM'd to you in the next few minutes.

Why does price reverse the second you enter? Because you're reacting to micro structure shifts while institutions are still executing the macro trend. Every market operates in 2 ranges simultaneously: 1) External range (macro structure) 2) Internal range (micro structure) Every market is always operating within BOTH ranges simultaneously. 1) External Ranges How do you identify it? Look at the SIZE of the pullbacks. If one pullback is twice the size of the others—that's your external break of structure. What does it tell you? Your overall bias. If the external range is bearish, you should be looking for sells. If it's bullish, you should be looking for buys. The external range doesn't tell you when NOT to trade—it tells you WHAT DIRECTION to trade. 2) Internal Ranges How do you identify it? Look for small breaks of structure that happen WITHIN your external range. These are the tiny pullbacks that barely move price compared to the major swings. What does it tell you? Short-term trading opportunities. You CAN trade internal breaks, but manage your expectations. These aren't trend reversals—they're temporary counter-moves that create pullbacks before price continues with the external trend. The internal range tells you when there's a short-term trade setup, but NOT to expect a full reversal. In the video below, I've explained what happens when you trade internal breaks without identifying the external ranges (and how to solve this): — This is just one concept from my complete trading framework. We also cover how to identify when external structure is actually shifting, the 3 timeframes every trader needs to understand and how to identify discount zones for entry points. Just comment "RANGES" and the full breakdown will automatically be DM'd to you in the next few minutes.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

21,330 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

5-MINUTE BTC MARKETS ARE WAY MORE MANIPULATIVE THAN PEOPLE THINK replying to this because i literally recorded it > on the 5-min btc up/down market, in the last seconds before resolution, price was aggressively pushed in one direction > a sharp move > right before the cutoff > just enough to flip the outcome this isn’t normal volatility - it looks like deliberate last-second pressure to force resolution in someone’s favor 👉 in short - the final seconds matter more than the first four minutes now here’s the interesting part: > what if you let an OpenClaw🦞 bot trade these 5-minute markets > not for the entire 5 minutes > but specifically to wait > and react in the last seconds Instead of predicting direction - you let the bot monitor micro-moves near expiry and respond instantly that’s where the real game might be ❗️be careful with size but also… think about execution speed

5-MINUTE BTC MARKETS ARE WAY MORE MANIPULATIVE THAN PEOPLE THINK replying to this because i literally recorded it > on the 5-min btc up/down market, in the last seconds before resolution, price was aggressively pushed in one direction > a sharp move > right before the cutoff > just enough to flip the outcome this isn’t normal volatility - it looks like deliberate last-second pressure to force resolution in someone’s favor 👉 in short - the final seconds matter more than the first four minutes now here’s the interesting part: > what if you let an OpenClaw🦞 bot trade these 5-minute markets > not for the entire 5 minutes > but specifically to wait > and react in the last seconds Instead of predicting direction - you let the bot monitor micro-moves near expiry and respond instantly that’s where the real game might be ❗️be careful with size but also… think about execution speed

Mr. Buzzoni

28,177 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Everyone is panicking over Iran. Futures red. Feeds full of “this is the crash.” People convinced the market is about to unravel. I just dropped a full #SP500 breakdown explaining why this likely gets bought. If there is one video you watch this week, make it this one. I’ll say it again clearly. There is a 70% chance the #SP500 hits 690–693 by Wednesday. There is an 85% chance the #SP500 hits 690–693 by Thursday. Those probabilities didn’t disappear because of a headline. I’m in calls for next Friday. My plan was always to add size near 678–675. It looks like I may get that opportunity. And let me stress something most people ignore. Contract selection matters more than direction. You can be completely right about the move and still lose money if your delta is wrong, your gamma is weak or your expiration is too short. I started this short with about $6,000. Less than 0.5% of my total account. Go look at my pinned post. I constantly stress small size and building into positions. No single trade should ever exceed 6% of your total fund. At the open, my goal is simple. Bring strikes down. Improve delta and gamma. That way a partial move back up repairs the position quickly and continuation expands it. This is where opportunity meets preparation. Most will FOMO at the open. Most will react to emotion. Very few will execute a plan. I originally dropped this video for the Discord but I’m sharing it here because this week matters. I am not worried. I do not believe this is the true move. And that’s coming from someone who has been positioned for the larger unwind. If there is one thing I recommend you do, it is watch this video. Important things are about to happen. Those who prepare will be the ones who capitalize. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!! — TJ #SP500 #SPY #QQQ #TSLA #PLTR #NVDA #AAPL #Bitcoin #Crypto #stockmarket

Everyone is panicking over Iran. Futures red. Feeds full of “this is the crash.” People convinced the market is about to unravel. I just dropped a full #SP500 breakdown explaining why this likely gets bought. If there is one video you watch this week, make it this one. I’ll say it again clearly. There is a 70% chance the #SP500 hits 690–693 by Wednesday. There is an 85% chance the #SP500 hits 690–693 by Thursday. Those probabilities didn’t disappear because of a headline. I’m in calls for next Friday. My plan was always to add size near 678–675. It looks like I may get that opportunity. And let me stress something most people ignore. Contract selection matters more than direction. You can be completely right about the move and still lose money if your delta is wrong, your gamma is weak or your expiration is too short. I started this short with about $6,000. Less than 0.5% of my total account. Go look at my pinned post. I constantly stress small size and building into positions. No single trade should ever exceed 6% of your total fund. At the open, my goal is simple. Bring strikes down. Improve delta and gamma. That way a partial move back up repairs the position quickly and continuation expands it. This is where opportunity meets preparation. Most will FOMO at the open. Most will react to emotion. Very few will execute a plan. I originally dropped this video for the Discord but I’m sharing it here because this week matters. I am not worried. I do not believe this is the true move. And that’s coming from someone who has been positioned for the larger unwind. If there is one thing I recommend you do, it is watch this video. Important things are about to happen. Those who prepare will be the ones who capitalize. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!! — TJ #SP500 #SPY #QQQ #TSLA #PLTR #NVDA #AAPL #Bitcoin #Crypto #stockmarket

TraderJonesy

48,286 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Qullamaggie on the Importance of Leading Stocks “And like people post setups all the time on my stream. People post setups all the time, and this is the hard part — identifying a really good setup versus something that’s random and mediocre. Because that’s gonna also reflect on your results. If you trade the random setups, your results are gonna be random too. You want to find the outlier stocks. You want to see if it has relative strength. The best time to trade this breakout method is after a pullback in the markets. You want to see the stocks that held up the most — the ones that had big moves previously and held up the most. And if you master this setup, if you trade this setup coming out of a small correction, like say a 5-10 or 15% correction in the overall indices, that’s almost like free money for this type of setup. Because if you can identify the stocks that held up the most during the correction — that maybe went down initially but then stopped going down as the correction went on, and actually started building higher lows — that’s telling you something. If you have a stock that’s gone up a lot, and then it stops going down when the market goes down, you know the stock is trying to tell you something. And that’s what leading stocks do. Like every bull market, this is obviously the case. I’m gonna talk more about it later. You obviously need an up-trending or sideways market to trade this method. You have leading stocks — the stocks that go up the most and are the most liquid. And those are really the stocks you want to trade. They’re mostly mid and large caps, but even a small cap can be a leading stock. Those are really the stocks that don’t go down when the market goes down. It’s like you try to push a tennis ball underwater — it just pops back up. And those are the type of stocks you want to find when trading this method.”

Qullamaggie on the Importance of Leading Stocks “And like people post setups all the time on my stream. People post setups all the time, and this is the hard part — identifying a really good setup versus something that’s random and mediocre. Because that’s gonna also reflect on your results. If you trade the random setups, your results are gonna be random too. You want to find the outlier stocks. You want to see if it has relative strength. The best time to trade this breakout method is after a pullback in the markets. You want to see the stocks that held up the most — the ones that had big moves previously and held up the most. And if you master this setup, if you trade this setup coming out of a small correction, like say a 5-10 or 15% correction in the overall indices, that’s almost like free money for this type of setup. Because if you can identify the stocks that held up the most during the correction — that maybe went down initially but then stopped going down as the correction went on, and actually started building higher lows — that’s telling you something. If you have a stock that’s gone up a lot, and then it stops going down when the market goes down, you know the stock is trying to tell you something. And that’s what leading stocks do. Like every bull market, this is obviously the case. I’m gonna talk more about it later. You obviously need an up-trending or sideways market to trade this method. You have leading stocks — the stocks that go up the most and are the most liquid. And those are really the stocks you want to trade. They’re mostly mid and large caps, but even a small cap can be a leading stock. Those are really the stocks that don’t go down when the market goes down. It’s like you try to push a tennis ball underwater — it just pops back up. And those are the type of stocks you want to find when trading this method.”

Lone

14,473 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

CITADEL HAS STARTED TRADING ON POLYMARKET I’ve been studying wallets that farm crypto markets on Polymarket I found one that looks very institutional wallet 'A1d29' potentially a large hedge fund trader - 8 predictions - $310,000 PNL - huge win rate THE STRATEGY IS WEIRDLY CLEAN 1. Only daily markets (no 15-min noise) 2. The moment the market opens slam a large buy 3. Build a position like it’s being deployed from a fund This wallet trade rarely Only on days when there’s clear info about a move That’s why you see $300k-$400k swings on daily BTC/SOL directions If it goes wrong, they don’t panic sell like retail They do the fund playbook - Split size - Open the opposite side - Unwind / sell into the book This is exactly how big players can shape the tape on thin markets and still get paid I use Bullpen to put this wallet on track, waiting for the next guaranteed entry

CITADEL HAS STARTED TRADING ON POLYMARKET I’ve been studying wallets that farm crypto markets on Polymarket I found one that looks very institutional wallet 'A1d29' potentially a large hedge fund trader - 8 predictions - $310,000 PNL - huge win rate THE STRATEGY IS WEIRDLY CLEAN 1. Only daily markets (no 15-min noise) 2. The moment the market opens slam a large buy 3. Build a position like it’s being deployed from a fund This wallet trade rarely Only on days when there’s clear info about a move That’s why you see $300k-$400k swings on daily BTC/SOL directions If it goes wrong, they don’t panic sell like retail They do the fund playbook - Split size - Open the opposite side - Unwind / sell into the book This is exactly how big players can shape the tape on thin markets and still get paid I use Bullpen to put this wallet on track, waiting for the next guaranteed entry

gavelsv.patron

31,771 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

LUKE GROMEN: GOLD TO RUN THE US TRADE DEFICIT – $10K-$20K+ AHEAD? Macro strategist Luke Gromen drops a mind-bending take: the US isn't just exporting gold randomly—it's de facto settling massive trade deficits with physical gold flows. This could force gold prices way higher, paving the way for an official revaluation to tackle the debt mountain. THE GOLD EXPORT PARADOX – STRATEGY, NOT WEAKNESS ➡️ Gromen says recent US gold exports don't kill the revaluation idea—they actually make it possible. ➡️ The trade deficit is enormous and nobody else wants to keep financing it forever. ➡️ Gold flows out to settle parts of it, letting the market bid the price up naturally. HOW GOLD STARTS "RUNNING" THE DEFICIT ➡️ No paper market alone can absorb deficits this size anymore. ➡️ Gold becomes the neutral settlement asset when the price rises high enough. ➡️ "Gold is going to run the deficits... rather than the US running the deficits." THE PRICE LEVELS REQUIRED FOR THIS SHIFT ➡️ $5,000 gold is far too low to handle the volume needed. ➡️ Real settlement power requires $10,000, $15,000 or even $20,000+ gold. ➡️ "It's not going to happen at $5,000 gold. It's going to need $10,000 gold, $15,000 gold, $20,000 gold." THE REVALUATION PLAY THAT FOLLOWS ➡️ Once trade bids gold that high, the US can simply revalue its official holdings. ➡️ One accounting move marks gold to market and creates trillions instantly. ➡️ Treasury Secretary gets huge flexibility to shorten the long end of the curve and strengthen the balance sheet. CHINA'S TREASURY REDUCTION – SMART, NOT DESPERATE ➡️ Cutting Treasuries is not proof of a collapsing Chinese economy. ➡️ Desperate nations sell gold—China keeps aggressively buying it. ➡️ This looks like preparation for a stronger yuan, weaker dollar deal tied to future trade talks. THE BOTTOM LINE Luke Gromen sees America's trade deficits turning into the ultimate bullish driver for gold, quietly forcing a much higher price floor before the US rides the wave to recapitalize its books in one clean move. The old dollar-deficit era ends not with a crash, but with gold quietly taking over the burden. HT: Luke Gromen #Gold #Macro #TradeDeficit #LukeGromen #MonetaryReset #DollarSystem

LUKE GROMEN: GOLD TO RUN THE US TRADE DEFICIT – $10K-$20K+ AHEAD? Macro strategist Luke Gromen drops a mind-bending take: the US isn't just exporting gold randomly—it's de facto settling massive trade deficits with physical gold flows. This could force gold prices way higher, paving the way for an official revaluation to tackle the debt mountain. THE GOLD EXPORT PARADOX – STRATEGY, NOT WEAKNESS ➡️ Gromen says recent US gold exports don't kill the revaluation idea—they actually make it possible. ➡️ The trade deficit is enormous and nobody else wants to keep financing it forever. ➡️ Gold flows out to settle parts of it, letting the market bid the price up naturally. HOW GOLD STARTS "RUNNING" THE DEFICIT ➡️ No paper market alone can absorb deficits this size anymore. ➡️ Gold becomes the neutral settlement asset when the price rises high enough. ➡️ "Gold is going to run the deficits... rather than the US running the deficits." THE PRICE LEVELS REQUIRED FOR THIS SHIFT ➡️ $5,000 gold is far too low to handle the volume needed. ➡️ Real settlement power requires $10,000, $15,000 or even $20,000+ gold. ➡️ "It's not going to happen at $5,000 gold. It's going to need $10,000 gold, $15,000 gold, $20,000 gold." THE REVALUATION PLAY THAT FOLLOWS ➡️ Once trade bids gold that high, the US can simply revalue its official holdings. ➡️ One accounting move marks gold to market and creates trillions instantly. ➡️ Treasury Secretary gets huge flexibility to shorten the long end of the curve and strengthen the balance sheet. CHINA'S TREASURY REDUCTION – SMART, NOT DESPERATE ➡️ Cutting Treasuries is not proof of a collapsing Chinese economy. ➡️ Desperate nations sell gold—China keeps aggressively buying it. ➡️ This looks like preparation for a stronger yuan, weaker dollar deal tied to future trade talks. THE BOTTOM LINE Luke Gromen sees America's trade deficits turning into the ultimate bullish driver for gold, quietly forcing a much higher price floor before the US rides the wave to recapitalize its books in one clean move. The old dollar-deficit era ends not with a crash, but with gold quietly taking over the burden. HT: Luke Gromen #Gold #Macro #TradeDeficit #LukeGromen #MonetaryReset #DollarSystem

Mark

168,466 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Stride Stop 101: The Secret Move That Transforms Your Paint Game During Jay Wright’s tenure, Villanova was known for their ability to play off 2 feet in the paint. It was a separator for them. But what exactly does play off 2 feet mean? It could mean a number of different things. When it comes to playing off 2, one of your best options is the stride stop. Unfortunately, it’s one of the more challenging footworks to teach. While jump stops come naturally to most players, stride stops can be difficult to learn. Many players get frustrated and never master this move. As a result, they limit themselves when they get to the paint. Make sure that’s not the case for you and your players! What Exactly Is a Stride Stop? Unlock This Key Finishing Move What is a stride stop? Like a jump stop, a stride stop is a 2 foot stop. Unlike a jump stop, your feet don’t hit at the same time. Instead, your outside foot hits first. The stride stop is useful in a couple driving situations: -When a help defender comes across to take a charge. -When the on ball defender is physically on the inside shoulder. Coach Matt Lewis teaches the stride stop as a key element of The Flow Motion Offense.

Stride Stop 101: The Secret Move That Transforms Your Paint Game During Jay Wright’s tenure, Villanova was known for their ability to play off 2 feet in the paint. It was a separator for them. But what exactly does play off 2 feet mean? It could mean a number of different things. When it comes to playing off 2, one of your best options is the stride stop. Unfortunately, it’s one of the more challenging footworks to teach. While jump stops come naturally to most players, stride stops can be difficult to learn. Many players get frustrated and never master this move. As a result, they limit themselves when they get to the paint. Make sure that’s not the case for you and your players! What Exactly Is a Stride Stop? Unlock This Key Finishing Move What is a stride stop? Like a jump stop, a stride stop is a 2 foot stop. Unlike a jump stop, your feet don’t hit at the same time. Instead, your outside foot hits first. The stride stop is useful in a couple driving situations: -When a help defender comes across to take a charge. -When the on ball defender is physically on the inside shoulder. Coach Matt Lewis teaches the stride stop as a key element of The Flow Motion Offense.

Joe Haefner | Breakthrough Basketball

45,629 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

10 days ago, we introduced Splash the Pot to AoF games to test the feature and gather initial input from players. Since then, we’ve been closely monitoring how it performs and how you interact with it and we got a lot of good feedback. Today, we’re ready to move into the next phase with the introduction of new Infused Splash Pots. 💰 CoinPoker will be adding $500,000 extra per week directly into Splash the Pot. This builds on top of the existing system and turns it into a true rewards layer within the game. For context, Splash the Pot works by triggering random drops directly into active hands. These drops come from a shared splash pool built through gameplay, where 100% of the pool of any splash contribution is returned to players. CoinPoker does not take any cut of it. With the addition of infusion, the system is no longer only driven by player contributions. CoinPoker is adding extra funds on top of the existing pool, so splashes now carry additional value that comes directly from us, and its a net positive for the players. In practice, this leads to bigger rewards appearing directly in-game, including Mega Splashes that can reach up to 1000 big blinds. Players can follow splash activity, pool performance, and results directly in the client at any time, with clear visibility into how the system is running. To make the system more balanced across the table, each splash will be split between the pot winner and the rest of the players involved. We’ve tested different ways to structure this split internally, but what percentage should go to the winner versus the rest of the table is something we want to shape together with the community. We’ve set up a poll in the first comment. We’d really appreciate your input. Your feedback is a key part of how we build and improve our rewards systems, and we’ll continue shaping this together with players. Thank you again for your continued support. The CoinPoker Team

10 days ago, we introduced Splash the Pot to AoF games to test the feature and gather initial input from players. Since then, we’ve been closely monitoring how it performs and how you interact with it and we got a lot of good feedback. Today, we’re ready to move into the next phase with the introduction of new Infused Splash Pots. 💰 CoinPoker will be adding $500,000 extra per week directly into Splash the Pot. This builds on top of the existing system and turns it into a true rewards layer within the game. For context, Splash the Pot works by triggering random drops directly into active hands. These drops come from a shared splash pool built through gameplay, where 100% of the pool of any splash contribution is returned to players. CoinPoker does not take any cut of it. With the addition of infusion, the system is no longer only driven by player contributions. CoinPoker is adding extra funds on top of the existing pool, so splashes now carry additional value that comes directly from us, and its a net positive for the players. In practice, this leads to bigger rewards appearing directly in-game, including Mega Splashes that can reach up to 1000 big blinds. Players can follow splash activity, pool performance, and results directly in the client at any time, with clear visibility into how the system is running. To make the system more balanced across the table, each splash will be split between the pot winner and the rest of the players involved. We’ve tested different ways to structure this split internally, but what percentage should go to the winner versus the rest of the table is something we want to shape together with the community. We’ve set up a poll in the first comment. We’d really appreciate your input. Your feedback is a key part of how we build and improve our rewards systems, and we’ll continue shaping this together with players. Thank you again for your continued support. The CoinPoker Team

CoinPoker

26,625 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Before you trade futures, you MUST the contracts you are trading. Every contract, comes with two key numbers: 1) Tick size 2) Tick value Tick size is the smallest price movement the contract can make Tick value is how much money you make or lose per tick Here's how to calculate what one point is worth: For example, let’s look at the NASDAQ 100 E-mini (NQ): • Tick size: 0.25 • Tick value: $5 per tick • One point = 4 ticks × $5 = $20 per point • Margin required: ~$17,600 Or the NASDAQ 100 Micro (MNQ): • Tick size: 0.25 • Tick value: $0.50 per tick • One point = 4 ticks × $0.50 = $2 per point • Margin required: ~$1,760 See the difference? The micro contract is 1/10th the size—perfect for beginners. S&P 500 E-mini (ES): • Tick value: $12.50 per tick • One point = $50 • Margin: ~$15,400 S&P 500 Micro (MES): • Tick value: $1.25 per tick • One point = $5 • Margin: ~$1,540 Why this matters: If your stop loss is 10 points away on MES, you're risking $50. On ES? You're risking $500. It’s the same setup, but different exposure. This is why most beginners blow up—they don't understand contract specs and trade position sizes way too large for their account. Pro tip: Stick to micro contracts (MES, MNQ) until you're consistently profitable. Lower margin means mistakes cost less while you learn. — This is just scratching the surface. In the full 2-hour futures trading masterclass, I break down: • How to calculate exact position sizes so you never blow your account • The 3 beginner mistakes that cost traders thousands (and how to avoid them) • Live chart examples walking through actual entries and exits step-by-step Just comment "FUTURES" and I'll send you the complete masterclass in the next few minutes.

Before you trade futures, you MUST the contracts you are trading. Every contract, comes with two key numbers: 1) Tick size 2) Tick value Tick size is the smallest price movement the contract can make Tick value is how much money you make or lose per tick Here's how to calculate what one point is worth: For example, let’s look at the NASDAQ 100 E-mini (NQ): • Tick size: 0.25 • Tick value: $5 per tick • One point = 4 ticks × $5 = $20 per point • Margin required: ~$17,600 Or the NASDAQ 100 Micro (MNQ): • Tick size: 0.25 • Tick value: $0.50 per tick • One point = 4 ticks × $0.50 = $2 per point • Margin required: ~$1,760 See the difference? The micro contract is 1/10th the size—perfect for beginners. S&P 500 E-mini (ES): • Tick value: $12.50 per tick • One point = $50 • Margin: ~$15,400 S&P 500 Micro (MES): • Tick value: $1.25 per tick • One point = $5 • Margin: ~$1,540 Why this matters: If your stop loss is 10 points away on MES, you're risking $50. On ES? You're risking $500. It’s the same setup, but different exposure. This is why most beginners blow up—they don't understand contract specs and trade position sizes way too large for their account. Pro tip: Stick to micro contracts (MES, MNQ) until you're consistently profitable. Lower margin means mistakes cost less while you learn. — This is just scratching the surface. In the full 2-hour futures trading masterclass, I break down: • How to calculate exact position sizes so you never blow your account • The 3 beginner mistakes that cost traders thousands (and how to avoid them) • Live chart examples walking through actual entries and exits step-by-step Just comment "FUTURES" and I'll send you the complete masterclass in the next few minutes.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

11,093 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

𝕏 Monetization Update: You now have to keep 5 million impressions every 90-day cycle to be monetized. This means that if you do not reach that amount, you will be demonetized, and the number will reset until you reach 5 million impressions again. If you break this down, you have to hit around 55K impressions DAILY for 90 days consistently and FOREVER. This, in theory, sounds doable, and yes, it is. But the real issues lie in the result of this. - Spam replies will come back. - Bot problems will get worse. But most importantly, real creators(small to mid-size) are going to get discouraged and quit. Isn’t it X’s goal to keep growing as a platform? How does this help with that? You are basically removing a rough diamond before it gets a chance to shine. Nikita, isn’t your goal to develop a tool that lets creators be creative and organic? Then incentivize them to do exactly that. Help them and cultivate them so one of them can become iShowSpeed or Mr. Beast in X. Every time YOU update X, I do not see it benefiting the creators. Stop overthinking it. Listen to the community. That is it. Personally, I do not care about making $ 1 an hour. But I know many creators do. This is just my two cents.

𝕏 Monetization Update: You now have to keep 5 million impressions every 90-day cycle to be monetized. This means that if you do not reach that amount, you will be demonetized, and the number will reset until you reach 5 million impressions again. If you break this down, you have to hit around 55K impressions DAILY for 90 days consistently and FOREVER. This, in theory, sounds doable, and yes, it is. But the real issues lie in the result of this. - Spam replies will come back. - Bot problems will get worse. But most importantly, real creators(small to mid-size) are going to get discouraged and quit. Isn’t it X’s goal to keep growing as a platform? How does this help with that? You are basically removing a rough diamond before it gets a chance to shine. Nikita, isn’t your goal to develop a tool that lets creators be creative and organic? Then incentivize them to do exactly that. Help them and cultivate them so one of them can become iShowSpeed or Mr. Beast in X. Every time YOU update X, I do not see it benefiting the creators. Stop overthinking it. Listen to the community. That is it. Personally, I do not care about making $ 1 an hour. But I know many creators do. This is just my two cents.

Jin Jung

54,271 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

After studying GoDark for days, going through all the content to really understand the tone, the product, the philosophy… and brainstorming hundreds of different directions, hundred's of video and image generations later, this was the idea that stuck with me. Because it wasn’t just about visuals, it was about capturing a feeling. The challenge was simple on paper… how do you show something that isn’t supposed to be seen? No visible subject. No obvious reveal. Just presence… through impact. Every detail had to sell that feeling, distortion in the air, subtle environmental reactions, light flickers, pressure without proof. The most visible system in the world. The blockchain. And still, nothing to see. You can move millions… and no one even knows you were there. That’s what GoDark represents to me. Trade Unseen. Enhanced Execution. Absolute Privacy. Efficient Liquidity. Curious to hear what you guys think about the video! 👇 #godarkvideo

After studying GoDark for days, going through all the content to really understand the tone, the product, the philosophy… and brainstorming hundreds of different directions, hundred's of video and image generations later, this was the idea that stuck with me. Because it wasn’t just about visuals, it was about capturing a feeling. The challenge was simple on paper… how do you show something that isn’t supposed to be seen? No visible subject. No obvious reveal. Just presence… through impact. Every detail had to sell that feeling, distortion in the air, subtle environmental reactions, light flickers, pressure without proof. The most visible system in the world. The blockchain. And still, nothing to see. You can move millions… and no one even knows you were there. That’s what GoDark represents to me. Trade Unseen. Enhanced Execution. Absolute Privacy. Efficient Liquidity. Curious to hear what you guys think about the video! 👇 #godarkvideo

BopCrypto

12,818 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 WARNING: SOMETHING VERY UNUSUAL IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW Treasury yields just surged from 3.9% to 4.3% in MINUTES. Then it happened again. And again. THREE TIMES IN A ROW. The U.S. bond market is collapsing in real time. And that’s not random... Someone is dumping MASSIVE amounts of U.S. Treasuries onto the market. And here’s what matters: When bonds get dumped, yields explode higher. That’s how the bond market works. Which means whoever sold didn’t care about getting the best price. They wanted OUT immediately. That’s the signal. And most people don’t understand how serious that is. The Treasury market is the foundation of the entire financial system. It’s where central banks park reserves. It’s where foreign governments store capital. It’s where the largest institutions on earth hide liquidity. Retail does NOT move the 2yr yield like this. Not even close. This was institutional size. The kind of size that forces the market to react. And that creates one question: Who is exiting? A foreign government reducing exposure. A forced liquidation. A systemic event behind the scenes. One thing is certain: This was NOT normal. And markets always reveal the truth before headlines do. That’s why this week matters. Because when bonds move first… Everything else follows. → Stocks → Currencies → Risk assets → Bitcoin and crypto All of it. The market is sending a message. And ignoring it will be expensive. Watch closely. The next major move is already starting. Follow and turn notifications on before it's too late. You do NOT want to miss what happens next.

🚨 WARNING: SOMETHING VERY UNUSUAL IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW Treasury yields just surged from 3.9% to 4.3% in MINUTES. Then it happened again. And again. THREE TIMES IN A ROW. The U.S. bond market is collapsing in real time. And that’s not random... Someone is dumping MASSIVE amounts of U.S. Treasuries onto the market. And here’s what matters: When bonds get dumped, yields explode higher. That’s how the bond market works. Which means whoever sold didn’t care about getting the best price. They wanted OUT immediately. That’s the signal. And most people don’t understand how serious that is. The Treasury market is the foundation of the entire financial system. It’s where central banks park reserves. It’s where foreign governments store capital. It’s where the largest institutions on earth hide liquidity. Retail does NOT move the 2yr yield like this. Not even close. This was institutional size. The kind of size that forces the market to react. And that creates one question: Who is exiting? A foreign government reducing exposure. A forced liquidation. A systemic event behind the scenes. One thing is certain: This was NOT normal. And markets always reveal the truth before headlines do. That’s why this week matters. Because when bonds move first… Everything else follows. → Stocks → Currencies → Risk assets → Bitcoin and crypto All of it. The market is sending a message. And ignoring it will be expensive. Watch closely. The next major move is already starting. Follow and turn notifications on before it's too late. You do NOT want to miss what happens next.

0xNobler

49,831 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

THE "CONSISTENTLY PROFITABLE" SKILL GAP & THE MYTH OF SUPPLEMENTAL INCOME FROM TRADING For many new traders or part-time traders, there is this pervasive belief that with some time and effort, they'll be able to make "just" a few grand per month to supplement their income. Or they "don't want to aim big, they just want to replace their current salary via trading so they can have more freedom." This is because people mistakenly believe that trading is like most other jobs, rather than it being a winner-take-all performance endeavor more akin to becoming a professional athlete. 99.9% of athletes will never make a dime professionally. There is no market demand for your average high school or college player. To even make league minimum in the NBA, you are still in the .0001% of basketball players. There is no such thing as just deciding to casually make a few grand as a pro athlete. Think about what it takes for someone to make $50k/yr as a golfer? The skill gap to earn an income or make the league minimum is crazy to comprehend. The analogy I gave with AT09 was the story of Brian Scalabrine. Even though Brian Scalabrine “sucked” in the NBA, he would absolutely annihilate 99.9% of the people calling him trash. He once said the famous line that he’s closer in skill to LeBron James than his haters are to him, and that line perfectly explains trading. The gap between unprofitable and elite looks massive from the outside, but the real canyon is between unprofitable and making any amount of money consistently. People look at a trader making $1M a year and think that’s a different species. They assume someone doing $100k a year is basically the same as the guy still blowing accounts, just with better luck. That’s like saying Scalabrine and your friend who plays pickup on Tuesdays are basically equal because neither is LeBron. Going from $0 to consistently profitable is the hardest jump in trading. You CANNOT just casually make a few grand per month or supplement income part-time. The skill level needed to consistently make ANY AMOUNT trading is the equivalent of being in the league. A trader who can pull $100k a year out of the market is not “kind of good.” They have competency in finding edge, executing trades, handling their psychology and risk management, and are competing in the league. From there, scaling to $300k, $500k, even $1M is usually a function of size, capital, and refinement, not a complete identity shift. But the trader still stuck at breakeven or red? They’re not one tweak away from $100k. They’re not “basically there.” They’re still trying to prove they belong on the court at all. The uncomfortable truth is this: the distance between $0 and $100k is far greater than the distance between $100k and $1M. One requires becoming a professional. The other simply just requires becoming a more refined one. My confidence in taking a trader from $100k to $1m is probably 10x higher than my confidence in taking a trader from $0 to $100k.

THE "CONSISTENTLY PROFITABLE" SKILL GAP & THE MYTH OF SUPPLEMENTAL INCOME FROM TRADING For many new traders or part-time traders, there is this pervasive belief that with some time and effort, they'll be able to make "just" a few grand per month to supplement their income. Or they "don't want to aim big, they just want to replace their current salary via trading so they can have more freedom." This is because people mistakenly believe that trading is like most other jobs, rather than it being a winner-take-all performance endeavor more akin to becoming a professional athlete. 99.9% of athletes will never make a dime professionally. There is no market demand for your average high school or college player. To even make league minimum in the NBA, you are still in the .0001% of basketball players. There is no such thing as just deciding to casually make a few grand as a pro athlete. Think about what it takes for someone to make $50k/yr as a golfer? The skill gap to earn an income or make the league minimum is crazy to comprehend. The analogy I gave with AT09 was the story of Brian Scalabrine. Even though Brian Scalabrine “sucked” in the NBA, he would absolutely annihilate 99.9% of the people calling him trash. He once said the famous line that he’s closer in skill to LeBron James than his haters are to him, and that line perfectly explains trading. The gap between unprofitable and elite looks massive from the outside, but the real canyon is between unprofitable and making any amount of money consistently. People look at a trader making $1M a year and think that’s a different species. They assume someone doing $100k a year is basically the same as the guy still blowing accounts, just with better luck. That’s like saying Scalabrine and your friend who plays pickup on Tuesdays are basically equal because neither is LeBron. Going from $0 to consistently profitable is the hardest jump in trading. You CANNOT just casually make a few grand per month or supplement income part-time. The skill level needed to consistently make ANY AMOUNT trading is the equivalent of being in the league. A trader who can pull $100k a year out of the market is not “kind of good.” They have competency in finding edge, executing trades, handling their psychology and risk management, and are competing in the league. From there, scaling to $300k, $500k, even $1M is usually a function of size, capital, and refinement, not a complete identity shift. But the trader still stuck at breakeven or red? They’re not one tweak away from $100k. They’re not “basically there.” They’re still trying to prove they belong on the court at all. The uncomfortable truth is this: the distance between $0 and $100k is far greater than the distance between $100k and $1M. One requires becoming a professional. The other simply just requires becoming a more refined one. My confidence in taking a trader from $100k to $1m is probably 10x higher than my confidence in taking a trader from $0 to $100k.

Lance Breitstein 🇺🇸🌎

168,021 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Etherealize CEO Vivek Raman on how ETH can evolve as money for Wall Street “In the world of tokenized assets, you need an asset that’s money-like and can be used globally that doesn’t have the counterparty risk or an off-chain anchor. That’s what ETH is.” “The more tokenization happens, the more you need a trading pair between those tokenized assets. ETH first found product/market fit in the DeFi ecosystem. Every crypto asset is paired against ETH. Then you saw digital art, which is also paired against ETH. ETH is the most common trading pair and the most common collateral.” “You’ve seen the initial versions of its utility, but that’s just the crypto-native players. Imagine when the Wall Street players start to realize that too… This is how you can start to see the institutional money thesis play out, but it’s early.” ETH is one leg of most high-volume pools on Uniswap V3. On Aave (the largest DeFi lending protocol) ETH alone accounts for ~40% of all loans, according to CoinDesk. As Vivek puts it: “Blockchains are understood. Tokenization and stablecoins are understood. ETH the asset is next.” Watch the full interview with Vivek Raman 👇

Etherealize CEO Vivek Raman on how ETH can evolve as money for Wall Street “In the world of tokenized assets, you need an asset that’s money-like and can be used globally that doesn’t have the counterparty risk or an off-chain anchor. That’s what ETH is.” “The more tokenization happens, the more you need a trading pair between those tokenized assets. ETH first found product/market fit in the DeFi ecosystem. Every crypto asset is paired against ETH. Then you saw digital art, which is also paired against ETH. ETH is the most common trading pair and the most common collateral.” “You’ve seen the initial versions of its utility, but that’s just the crypto-native players. Imagine when the Wall Street players start to realize that too… This is how you can start to see the institutional money thesis play out, but it’s early.” ETH is one leg of most high-volume pools on Uniswap V3. On Aave (the largest DeFi lending protocol) ETH alone accounts for ~40% of all loans, according to CoinDesk. As Vivek puts it: “Blockchains are understood. Tokenization and stablecoins are understood. ETH the asset is next.” Watch the full interview with Vivek Raman 👇

Etherealize

13,458 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Over the past year, I’ve integrated a concept I learned from Stanley Druckenmiller into my process called “invest and then investigate.” This approach played a key role in some of my recent big trades such as $ETH and $IWM. Have you ever discovered a compelling idea, spent days or weeks researching, and by the time you’re ready, a big portion of the move has already happened? That little hesitation creates what Druck calls “psychological paralysis”—you feel locked out, and it becomes mentally harder to buy higher. You then have to watch your big trade opportunity go without you or even worse, you get FOMO and chase the move, only to get caught in the pullback. Now, whenever I sense an opportunity with serious potential, I make immediate contact. I start small, just enough to get exposure, and then gradually size up as new information confirms my thesis and price action supports it. If i already have an initial stake, even if it’s small, adding as my conviction builds feels much more natural. This helps avoid adding too much size too quick, while also buying you time to really investigate the idea and build your conviction. Sometimes that starter position gets cut entirely, other times it grows into a large position. Making that initial contact has helped me tremendously when it comes to dealing with high conviction and big swing trade opportunities. 3x time U.S Investing Champion David Ryan also uses a similar concept within his trading called “mental health buys”. He will buy a small position in a stock he wants to own but that it is not perfectly setup yet, with the goal of eventually making it a larger position. Here is a clip from Stan Druckenmiller discussing “invest and then investigate” on the In Good Company podcast.

Over the past year, I’ve integrated a concept I learned from Stanley Druckenmiller into my process called “invest and then investigate.” This approach played a key role in some of my recent big trades such as $ETH and $IWM. Have you ever discovered a compelling idea, spent days or weeks researching, and by the time you’re ready, a big portion of the move has already happened? That little hesitation creates what Druck calls “psychological paralysis”—you feel locked out, and it becomes mentally harder to buy higher. You then have to watch your big trade opportunity go without you or even worse, you get FOMO and chase the move, only to get caught in the pullback. Now, whenever I sense an opportunity with serious potential, I make immediate contact. I start small, just enough to get exposure, and then gradually size up as new information confirms my thesis and price action supports it. If i already have an initial stake, even if it’s small, adding as my conviction builds feels much more natural. This helps avoid adding too much size too quick, while also buying you time to really investigate the idea and build your conviction. Sometimes that starter position gets cut entirely, other times it grows into a large position. Making that initial contact has helped me tremendously when it comes to dealing with high conviction and big swing trade opportunities. 3x time U.S Investing Champion David Ryan also uses a similar concept within his trading called “mental health buys”. He will buy a small position in a stock he wants to own but that it is not perfectly setup yet, with the goal of eventually making it a larger position. Here is a clip from Stan Druckenmiller discussing “invest and then investigate” on the In Good Company podcast.

Bracco ⚡️

27,897 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten