Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Quick Question — How much does your favorite Rolex guy sell his Chapati? Responsible waste management begins at generation. Sharifah Buzeki — Hajjat Sharifah Buzeki 📢 Quoted post (tweet) = Context. #ForALivableCity

Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA)

332,925 subscribers

21,455 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

#ForALivableCity

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

But surely, why would you go to a supermarket to buy a toothbrush and accept a polythene bag? 🤔 Sharifah Buzeki — Hajjat Sharifah Buzeki 📢 REFUSE waste #ForALivableCity

But surely, why would you go to a supermarket to buy a toothbrush and accept a polythene bag? 🤔 Sharifah Buzeki — Hajjat Sharifah Buzeki 📢 REFUSE waste #ForALivableCity

Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA)

84,156 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Vern Terrell runs Terrell Ranches in Hay Springs, Nebraska. His family settled there in 1948 on 100 acres. Through intensive grazing management, he's added the equivalent of HALF A RANCH to his operation — without buying more land. He saw a chart tracking four generations of farm families nationwide. 120 families in generation one. 22 by generation two. Nine by generation three. And by generation four, projections show just four of those original families still farming. 120 families. Four left. The old rancher who mentored him said: "To succeed in agriculture, you either have to be better than your neighbor at what he does, or you have to do something that nobody else wants to do." Grazing management was his answer. Nebraska Sandhills blow out if you don't keep cover on them. He heals blowouts with waste hay and round bales, lets the native seed already in the ground take hold. "The land's getting out of control of family farms and ranches. It's going to investors and big multi-dollar people. We need to keep as many family farms as we can." The ranchers who figure out how to produce more from the same acres are the ones still standing.

Vern Terrell runs Terrell Ranches in Hay Springs, Nebraska. His family settled there in 1948 on 100 acres. Through intensive grazing management, he's added the equivalent of HALF A RANCH to his operation — without buying more land. He saw a chart tracking four generations of farm families nationwide. 120 families in generation one. 22 by generation two. Nine by generation three. And by generation four, projections show just four of those original families still farming. 120 families. Four left. The old rancher who mentored him said: "To succeed in agriculture, you either have to be better than your neighbor at what he does, or you have to do something that nobody else wants to do." Grazing management was his answer. Nebraska Sandhills blow out if you don't keep cover on them. He heals blowouts with waste hay and round bales, lets the native seed already in the ground take hold. "The land's getting out of control of family farms and ranches. It's going to investors and big multi-dollar people. We need to keep as many family farms as we can." The ranchers who figure out how to produce more from the same acres are the ones still standing.

SAVE BEEF 🇺🇸 BeefMaps.com

11,244 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

WTF, THIS GUY STOPPED REPLYING TO HIS FRIENDS ON IMESSAGE. NOW HIS HERMES AI AGENT DOES IT FOR HIM AND THEY CAN’T TELL THE DIFFERENCE. Every time he gets a text, Hermes drafts a reply first. He never sends that draft. Instead, he writes his actual response and Hermes compares the two. The gap between what Hermes predicted and what he actually said becomes the training signal. Over time, that gap closes. The agent's drafts get closer and closer to exactly how he talks. His reasoning: email is performative. iMessage is where your real, unfiltered voice actually lives. Most people training AI to sound like them feed it formal writing – essays, emails, LinkedIn posts. That's not how anyone actually talks. This approach trains on the messiest, most honest version of someone's communication style. Quick replies. Half-finished thoughts. The way you actually text your friends. The result is an AI that doesn't write like a corporate version of you. It writes like you, texting at 11pm. This is what real personalization actually looks like, not a prompt that says "sound casual." Bookmark this post. Full breakdown in the video below.

WTF, THIS GUY STOPPED REPLYING TO HIS FRIENDS ON IMESSAGE. NOW HIS HERMES AI AGENT DOES IT FOR HIM AND THEY CAN’T TELL THE DIFFERENCE. Every time he gets a text, Hermes drafts a reply first. He never sends that draft. Instead, he writes his actual response and Hermes compares the two. The gap between what Hermes predicted and what he actually said becomes the training signal. Over time, that gap closes. The agent's drafts get closer and closer to exactly how he talks. His reasoning: email is performative. iMessage is where your real, unfiltered voice actually lives. Most people training AI to sound like them feed it formal writing – essays, emails, LinkedIn posts. That's not how anyone actually talks. This approach trains on the messiest, most honest version of someone's communication style. Quick replies. Half-finished thoughts. The way you actually text your friends. The result is an AI that doesn't write like a corporate version of you. It writes like you, texting at 11pm. This is what real personalization actually looks like, not a prompt that says "sound casual." Bookmark this post. Full breakdown in the video below.

SCOTTY BEAM

45,469 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This guy took a brand‑new app to #1 overall in the App Store and 1,000,000 downloads in under 3 days. For the FIRST TIME, he breaks down exactly how he did it, and we’re posting the full, RAW conversation right here on X To be clear, this is his first and only podcast on this playbook... And a little more context: this wasn’t luck. Jibran has taken 4 different apps to #1 in the App Store, including one that did $1.5M in 3 days and outranked ChatGPT He did it with a handful of creators, zero paid ads, and a product philosophy that blew my mind Here’s the core of what he taught me: > Your product and your marketing are not two separate things; they're the same thing. > What goes viral on TikTok is product validation. > What you learn from a hit video should change your UI, your App Store screenshots, your icon He ran that loop obsessively.. For his 2025 Wrapped app, he spent hundreds of hours in Figma asking one question: > “How does this look on TikTok?” Then he tracked: 1. What users screenshotted 2. What they shared to Snapchat 3. What slide they dropped off on The result was a #1 overall app in the App Store. Above EVERYTHING. Now he’s building because he realized he was spending hours every day doom‑scrolling TikTok looking for hooks and formats that worked So he built an AI to do it for him: > You tell it your app. > It tells you what to post, what’s trending in your niche, and what’s wrong with your existing videos. We go deep on all of it in this conversation. If you run a consumer app, this is the most useful 49 minutes you’ll spend this week

Alex Olim

106,825 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This guy coaches Sam Altman. He also works with leaders at Anthropic, Google, Apple, and SpaceX. I sat down with him to learn how he coaches billion dollar businesses. Here are Joe Hudson’s 7 operating rules: 1. Kill your 1:1s These meetings lead individuals to solve problems instead of the team. Much better to bring problems to the whole team so everyone feels responsible for solving them. I agree, haven’t done them for years... 2. Rotate who runs recurring meetings When the same person always leads, people focus on pleasing or rebelling against them. Spreading the authority makes everyone accountable to the team instead. 3. Give anyone the power to change a bad meeting Everyone already knows when a meeting isn’t working (and usually why). Giving people permission to say it makes meetings more effective. 4. Make every employee run at least 5 experiments a quarter on their own job It makes the team more productive, keeps people interested, and helps retain smart employees who would otherwise get bored. 5. Ask your team to push back on your ideas If you try to sell them on the idea, they may nod in the room and do nothing afterward. Asking for objections tests the idea + gets everyone aligned before you commit to it. 6. Start by building the part you understand the least If you leave the confusing part until the end you might find out it doesn’t fit and have to rebuild everything around it. 7. End every email with an action needed Name the person responsible, the action they need to take, and the deadline. Joe says this rule increased productivity in his business by 35 to 40%. Thanks for coming on Joe Hudson and sharing how you run your business. Search “BigDeal pod” on youtube.

This guy coaches Sam Altman. He also works with leaders at Anthropic, Google, Apple, and SpaceX. I sat down with him to learn how he coaches billion dollar businesses. Here are Joe Hudson’s 7 operating rules: 1. Kill your 1:1s These meetings lead individuals to solve problems instead of the team. Much better to bring problems to the whole team so everyone feels responsible for solving them. I agree, haven’t done them for years... 2. Rotate who runs recurring meetings When the same person always leads, people focus on pleasing or rebelling against them. Spreading the authority makes everyone accountable to the team instead. 3. Give anyone the power to change a bad meeting Everyone already knows when a meeting isn’t working (and usually why). Giving people permission to say it makes meetings more effective. 4. Make every employee run at least 5 experiments a quarter on their own job It makes the team more productive, keeps people interested, and helps retain smart employees who would otherwise get bored. 5. Ask your team to push back on your ideas If you try to sell them on the idea, they may nod in the room and do nothing afterward. Asking for objections tests the idea + gets everyone aligned before you commit to it. 6. Start by building the part you understand the least If you leave the confusing part until the end you might find out it doesn’t fit and have to rebuild everything around it. 7. End every email with an action needed Name the person responsible, the action they need to take, and the deadline. Joe says this rule increased productivity in his business by 35 to 40%. Thanks for coming on Joe Hudson and sharing how you run your business. Search “BigDeal pod” on youtube.

Codie Sanchez

305,506 просмотров • 13 дней назад

openai and anthropic probably have terrible sales reps they're talented, but they've never actually had to sell anything. ben horowitz said it best in a recent conversation: "right now with openai and anthropic, everybody wants to buy ai. they're already predisposed to buy." that's order-taking, not selling. let's zoom in on this distinction. 1) the order-taker problem cloudflare's CEO admitted in 2023 their product was so good that "many of our sales team succeeded largely by just taking orders." deals were like "fish jumping right in the boat." then the economy shifted and they fired 100 salespeople who'd contributed just 4% of new business. when your product sells itself, mediocre reps look like rockstars. they crush quota, win the president's club, and get promoted into leadership. nobody knows they can't actually sell until the fish stop jumping in the boat. 2) why hard sells matter ben won't shut up about ptc, a 90s cad/cam company. the product "wasn't that great." "the windshield wiper didn't work." but that forced discipline. you had to map accounts systematically, lay traps for competitors, and build airtight technical cases. his favorite hire was ryan gabrisco at databricks, who came from a company selling secure ftp as a public company. think about how good you have to be to make quota selling that. when ben hires sales leaders, he looks for people from companies where the product was hard to sell because that's the only way to test if someone can actually sell. 3) what happens when markets turn every hot market eventually cools. i'll give you a few examples. salesforce in 2001. facebook ads in 2012. aws in 2015. the order-takers got exposed every time. modern AI sales reps don't know how to qualify prospects who aren't already sold or how to systematically lock out competitors or how to build pipeline when inbound dries up. ben's story about hiring at Okta: two candidates, one super enthusiastic, the other said "let me talk to your customers first." ben told the ceo: "you want the guy qualifying YOU. that's what good salespeople do." 4) openai scaled their sales team from 10 to 500 people in under two years. anthropic is scaling fast too. but how would anyone know if they're good? you can't test sales ability when customers are lined up begging to buy. when real competition arrives, the kind where enterprises have three viable options and care about pricing, support, and vendor risk, AI companies will discover which GTM leaders can actually sell and which ones were just processing waitlists. 5) how to hire right if you're building a GTM team right now, think like a value investor. resumes don't matter. look for human capital that the market has significantly underpriced. someone who's had to sell a product that didn't sell itself, someone who's built discipline through necessity, not abundance (no order-takers). find the person who sold enterprise software at a company nobody's heard of. find the person who had to fight for every deal because the competitor was already embedded in the account. the person who figured out how to systematically lock out competition even when they were the underdog. those skills matter. for AI companies, the question is whether they can close deals when the market shifts. because when inbound dries up (it always does), you'll discover who can actually sell.

openai and anthropic probably have terrible sales reps they're talented, but they've never actually had to sell anything. ben horowitz said it best in a recent conversation: "right now with openai and anthropic, everybody wants to buy ai. they're already predisposed to buy." that's order-taking, not selling. let's zoom in on this distinction. 1) the order-taker problem cloudflare's CEO admitted in 2023 their product was so good that "many of our sales team succeeded largely by just taking orders." deals were like "fish jumping right in the boat." then the economy shifted and they fired 100 salespeople who'd contributed just 4% of new business. when your product sells itself, mediocre reps look like rockstars. they crush quota, win the president's club, and get promoted into leadership. nobody knows they can't actually sell until the fish stop jumping in the boat. 2) why hard sells matter ben won't shut up about ptc, a 90s cad/cam company. the product "wasn't that great." "the windshield wiper didn't work." but that forced discipline. you had to map accounts systematically, lay traps for competitors, and build airtight technical cases. his favorite hire was ryan gabrisco at databricks, who came from a company selling secure ftp as a public company. think about how good you have to be to make quota selling that. when ben hires sales leaders, he looks for people from companies where the product was hard to sell because that's the only way to test if someone can actually sell. 3) what happens when markets turn every hot market eventually cools. i'll give you a few examples. salesforce in 2001. facebook ads in 2012. aws in 2015. the order-takers got exposed every time. modern AI sales reps don't know how to qualify prospects who aren't already sold or how to systematically lock out competitors or how to build pipeline when inbound dries up. ben's story about hiring at Okta: two candidates, one super enthusiastic, the other said "let me talk to your customers first." ben told the ceo: "you want the guy qualifying YOU. that's what good salespeople do." 4) openai scaled their sales team from 10 to 500 people in under two years. anthropic is scaling fast too. but how would anyone know if they're good? you can't test sales ability when customers are lined up begging to buy. when real competition arrives, the kind where enterprises have three viable options and care about pricing, support, and vendor risk, AI companies will discover which GTM leaders can actually sell and which ones were just processing waitlists. 5) how to hire right if you're building a GTM team right now, think like a value investor. resumes don't matter. look for human capital that the market has significantly underpriced. someone who's had to sell a product that didn't sell itself, someone who's built discipline through necessity, not abundance (no order-takers). find the person who sold enterprise software at a company nobody's heard of. find the person who had to fight for every deal because the competitor was already embedded in the account. the person who figured out how to systematically lock out competition even when they were the underdog. those skills matter. for AI companies, the question is whether they can close deals when the market shifts. because when inbound dries up (it always does), you'll discover who can actually sell.

Courtne Marland

344,971 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

It must take enormous motivation to get ready every morning, commute from Ballabgarh towards Gurugram, arrive at a bus stand like this -and still take out your phone, record it, share it and hope that this time someone will care enough to act. Our dear member Sumit Tayal has been doing exactly that for 3 years. 3 years of documenting and reporting waste dumping and burning. 3 years of raising concerns. 3 years of hoping the civic authorities -including CAQM/CPCB -will hold the local authorities accountable and fix ground situation And yet, here we are. Open dumping. Open burning. Food waste, cups, plates, fruit waste, straws and plastic around vendor stalls. Stray cattle. Open defecation. Road dust. Filth. As Sumit says in the video: “सामने ही पुलिस चौकी और नगर निगम फरीदाबाद का कार्यालय भी है, तब ये हाल है।” The police post is right there. The Municipal Corporation Faridabad office is right there. Then how does this become #normal? PMO India -how does the government expect people to shift to public transport to reduce congestion and emissions when this is what awaits them? We aren’t asking for an airport lounge. We are asking for a decent bus stand in 2026: clean surroundings, functional toilets, drinking water, proper waste collection, source reduction and segregation, a system for vendors to manage their waste, no dumping or burning and a paved, usable approach road. And yes, we have all seen how quickly public spaces can be cleaned and made presentable when a VIP event is expected. So clearly, it can be done. But perhaps ordinary commuters know the truth: #We_are_not_VIPs_But_We_pay_taxes, use public transport and ask for basic civic infrastructure -while being lectured about our bhagidari. mool chand sharma ji a bus stand in 2026 should not look like 1426. Vipul Goel ji The SWM Rules, 2026 are in force. Three years of citizen documentation is enough. Please inspect. Please enforce. Please fix. And please tell citizens what action has been taken. Sumit has done his part. Now, who will do theirs? CMO Haryana Haryana Roadways Chief Secretary Haryana Directorate of Urban Local Bodies, Haryana Haryana State Pollution Control Board HSPCB, Ballabgarh region Central Pollution Control Board Commission for Air Quality Management #Ballabgarh #Faridabad #HaryanaRoadways #PublicTransport #WasteManagement #SWMRules2026 #OpenDumping #WasteBurning #CleanAirBharat #CivicAccountability #SmartCity Press Trust of India MoEF&CC Ministry of Health

It must take enormous motivation to get ready every morning, commute from Ballabgarh towards Gurugram, arrive at a bus stand like this -and still take out your phone, record it, share it and hope that this time someone will care enough to act. Our dear member Sumit Tayal has been doing exactly that for 3 years. 3 years of documenting and reporting waste dumping and burning. 3 years of raising concerns. 3 years of hoping the civic authorities -including CAQM/CPCB -will hold the local authorities accountable and fix ground situation And yet, here we are. Open dumping. Open burning. Food waste, cups, plates, fruit waste, straws and plastic around vendor stalls. Stray cattle. Open defecation. Road dust. Filth. As Sumit says in the video: “सामने ही पुलिस चौकी और नगर निगम फरीदाबाद का कार्यालय भी है, तब ये हाल है।” The police post is right there. The Municipal Corporation Faridabad office is right there. Then how does this become #normal? PMO India -how does the government expect people to shift to public transport to reduce congestion and emissions when this is what awaits them? We aren’t asking for an airport lounge. We are asking for a decent bus stand in 2026: clean surroundings, functional toilets, drinking water, proper waste collection, source reduction and segregation, a system for vendors to manage their waste, no dumping or burning and a paved, usable approach road. And yes, we have all seen how quickly public spaces can be cleaned and made presentable when a VIP event is expected. So clearly, it can be done. But perhaps ordinary commuters know the truth: #We_are_not_VIPs_But_We_pay_taxes, use public transport and ask for basic civic infrastructure -while being lectured about our bhagidari. mool chand sharma ji a bus stand in 2026 should not look like 1426. Vipul Goel ji The SWM Rules, 2026 are in force. Three years of citizen documentation is enough. Please inspect. Please enforce. Please fix. And please tell citizens what action has been taken. Sumit has done his part. Now, who will do theirs? CMO Haryana Haryana Roadways Chief Secretary Haryana Directorate of Urban Local Bodies, Haryana Haryana State Pollution Control Board HSPCB, Ballabgarh region Central Pollution Control Board Commission for Air Quality Management #Ballabgarh #Faridabad #HaryanaRoadways #PublicTransport #WasteManagement #SWMRules2026 #OpenDumping #WasteBurning #CleanAirBharat #CivicAccountability #SmartCity Press Trust of India MoEF&CC Ministry of Health

CitizensForCleanAirBharat

30,511 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

He started as a Fortnite player, learned how to trade memecoins. Now people say Cupsey makes more than an elite footballer. Here’s how he does it and what he’s hiding: Not much is known about Cupsey’s past, he kept his identity hidden from the start. But if you look at his early activity, you can tell he was just a regular guy. In 2022, Cupsey became active on Solana, but his focus was NFT trading. He joined communities like DeGods and SoDead Everything changed when the memecoin boom started and he began trading on Photon with 20 SOL, burned it all. Then put in 10, ran it up to 40, lost most, and ended up with 5. From there, he never stopped and according to him, he never deposited again. Cupsey started trading full-time, putting in 12 to 16 hours a day that’s how he learned how the game really worked. It’s also when he developed a taste for bondle tokens (Higher risk, higher reward) But this is where things start to get suspicious. Cupsey started building a reputation and that triggered a wave of copy traders ready to ape into every token he buys A massive advantage for him as a trader (Better entries, fresh liquidity) But not for those copying him His method is simple - insane buy/sell volume every single day. - apes into low market cap tokens and sells shortly after for small profits. - does +1,000 trades a day Cupsey had one red day in 7 months, lost just $400. He’s one of the top memecoin trader right now. But his copy traders are not so lucky. Its ok to learn from other traders, I’m not saying he’s not a really good one, but you should never blind follow and copy trade him Learn, find your own convictions and do it yourself. Again, don’t copy trade KOLs

He started as a Fortnite player, learned how to trade memecoins. Now people say Cupsey makes more than an elite footballer. Here’s how he does it and what he’s hiding: Not much is known about Cupsey’s past, he kept his identity hidden from the start. But if you look at his early activity, you can tell he was just a regular guy. In 2022, Cupsey became active on Solana, but his focus was NFT trading. He joined communities like DeGods and SoDead Everything changed when the memecoin boom started and he began trading on Photon with 20 SOL, burned it all. Then put in 10, ran it up to 40, lost most, and ended up with 5. From there, he never stopped and according to him, he never deposited again. Cupsey started trading full-time, putting in 12 to 16 hours a day that’s how he learned how the game really worked. It’s also when he developed a taste for bondle tokens (Higher risk, higher reward) But this is where things start to get suspicious. Cupsey started building a reputation and that triggered a wave of copy traders ready to ape into every token he buys A massive advantage for him as a trader (Better entries, fresh liquidity) But not for those copying him His method is simple - insane buy/sell volume every single day. - apes into low market cap tokens and sells shortly after for small profits. - does +1,000 trades a day Cupsey had one red day in 7 months, lost just $400. He’s one of the top memecoin trader right now. But his copy traders are not so lucky. Its ok to learn from other traders, I’m not saying he’s not a really good one, but you should never blind follow and copy trade him Learn, find your own convictions and do it yourself. Again, don’t copy trade KOLs

StarPlatinum

25,392 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Late last year, Palmer Luckey flew his helicopter to my office for a quick chat. He sported one of his signature Hawaiian shirts, but instead of his usual flip-flops, he wore what looked like a pair of heavy-duty socks with individual slots for each toe. Kind of like a glove for your feet. “Flying the helicopter requires a lot of footwork,” he said. “These give me a better feel for the pedals.” As you may know, Palmer Luckey is the virtual reality guy who started a company called Oculus when he was in his twenties and sold it to Facebook a few years later for a couple billion dollars. He has since gone on to do a number of interesting things, including starting a company called Anduril, which manufactures state-of-the-art weapons and a variety of autonomous systems for the United States military. I first met Palmer back in April at an energy conference in Laguna Beach. He showed up at that event on a motorcycle, wearing a jacket made entirely of copper. “It’s the perfect jacket for motorcycle riding,” he told me. “Much tougher than leather if you have a spill.” “How much does it weigh?” I asked. “Five pounds,” he said. “I like it because copper is an anti-microbial, so it never gets moldy. Plus, I can put my phone in the pocket, and it acts like a Faraday cage. Nobody can track me.” Obviously, we had a fascinating conversation about a number of topics, including how to win future wars, deindustrialize our manufacturing base, and reinvigorate the skilled trades. Along with a plan to eliminate the TSA, and some Hobbit-related sidebars. A short clip is attached. Our whole conversation is here. It's a good one...

Late last year, Palmer Luckey flew his helicopter to my office for a quick chat. He sported one of his signature Hawaiian shirts, but instead of his usual flip-flops, he wore what looked like a pair of heavy-duty socks with individual slots for each toe. Kind of like a glove for your feet. “Flying the helicopter requires a lot of footwork,” he said. “These give me a better feel for the pedals.” As you may know, Palmer Luckey is the virtual reality guy who started a company called Oculus when he was in his twenties and sold it to Facebook a few years later for a couple billion dollars. He has since gone on to do a number of interesting things, including starting a company called Anduril, which manufactures state-of-the-art weapons and a variety of autonomous systems for the United States military. I first met Palmer back in April at an energy conference in Laguna Beach. He showed up at that event on a motorcycle, wearing a jacket made entirely of copper. “It’s the perfect jacket for motorcycle riding,” he told me. “Much tougher than leather if you have a spill.” “How much does it weigh?” I asked. “Five pounds,” he said. “I like it because copper is an anti-microbial, so it never gets moldy. Plus, I can put my phone in the pocket, and it acts like a Faraday cage. Nobody can track me.” Obviously, we had a fascinating conversation about a number of topics, including how to win future wars, deindustrialize our manufacturing base, and reinvigorate the skilled trades. Along with a plan to eliminate the TSA, and some Hobbit-related sidebars. A short clip is attached. Our whole conversation is here. It's a good one...

The Real Mike Rowe

467,539 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

The debate about Clavicular boils down to one question: What does it mean to be Jewish? Yes, we’re losing the PR Battle, but do we—as Jews—sell our souls to win the PR Battle? We recognize people hate us, but does that mean we have to change? Absolutely not. They’ll hate us either way, so we must not change. Again, we can’t change who we are just to placate larger society and social media. Worse though, this instinct that we have to subsume our values at the altar of social media is an easily falsifiable premise disproven by one man: Ben Shapiro. Ben Shapiro has sold out every single one of his campus tours and talks for the last decade. Campus tours. As in, for young people. The same people Clavicular reaches and influences. But unlike Calvicular, Shapiro hasn’t done that by changing who he is or by shedding his core Jewish values. No! He’s done it by staying true to himself, by staying true to traditional Jewish values. Are we seriously trying to tell the younger generation that—as Jews—it’s better to be arsim and mogg your way through Tel Aviv or do you think we should point to the guy who runs a wildly successful and influential media company, sells out all his campus dates, and just had his fifth child? As Jews, the answer is simple: Stop promoting vanity. Stop excusing degeneracy. These aren’t Jewish values. If we change who we are just to win the PR Battle then we’ll lose no matter what. Plus, when it’s all said and done, not only is Ben Shapiro the better man, he can do more pull ups than Clavicular. I want the real deal, not a brittle show pony.

The debate about Clavicular boils down to one question: What does it mean to be Jewish? Yes, we’re losing the PR Battle, but do we—as Jews—sell our souls to win the PR Battle? We recognize people hate us, but does that mean we have to change? Absolutely not. They’ll hate us either way, so we must not change. Again, we can’t change who we are just to placate larger society and social media. Worse though, this instinct that we have to subsume our values at the altar of social media is an easily falsifiable premise disproven by one man: Ben Shapiro. Ben Shapiro has sold out every single one of his campus tours and talks for the last decade. Campus tours. As in, for young people. The same people Clavicular reaches and influences. But unlike Calvicular, Shapiro hasn’t done that by changing who he is or by shedding his core Jewish values. No! He’s done it by staying true to himself, by staying true to traditional Jewish values. Are we seriously trying to tell the younger generation that—as Jews—it’s better to be arsim and mogg your way through Tel Aviv or do you think we should point to the guy who runs a wildly successful and influential media company, sells out all his campus dates, and just had his fifth child? As Jews, the answer is simple: Stop promoting vanity. Stop excusing degeneracy. These aren’t Jewish values. If we change who we are just to win the PR Battle then we’ll lose no matter what. Plus, when it’s all said and done, not only is Ben Shapiro the better man, he can do more pull ups than Clavicular. I want the real deal, not a brittle show pony.

Jake Donnelly

13,517 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Every hour, 70 people die from cancer in the United States. That’s roughly 1,700 lives every day. When I read those stats, I realised how overwhelming it can feel to try understand this disease and why it can feel almost impossible to navigate the science behind it. That is why I invited Professor Thomas Seyfried back to try and understand the science further, question the system and explore what we may still be getting wrong. Thomas has spent 50 years researching cancer. He is a Professor of Biology at Boston College, the author of more than 150 peer-reviewed papers and one of the most passionate people I have met when speaking about this disease. His work explores a metabolic view of cancer. In simpler terms, he believes we need to pay much closer attention to how cancer cells create energy, how their metabolism differs from healthy cells and what that could mean for future research. We discussed things like: - The new research he brought into the studio in a confidential envelope… - How damaged mitochondria could change the way we understand cancer. - The three things he believes matter most for living longer. - Why cutting sugar alone does not fully explain how cancer cells survive. - Where keto can become dangerous or misunderstood?! - Changes he would make if he were responsible for public health. There were moments when I asked Thomas to simplify his explanations and pushed for clarity on what's been demonstrated in research and what still needs further study. That distinction matters. Thomas's work is focused on scientific research, not clinical practice. I left this conversation thinking about how progress often begins - someone asks a question that doesn't fit comfortably inside the existing explanation, then spends decades trying to answer it. Cancer will affect almost every family in some way. This is a challenging conversation, but one I believe is worth hearing in full. *The views expressed are those of the guest and this conversation is intended for general informational purposes only. This podcast and its associated materials should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Every hour, 70 people die from cancer in the United States. That’s roughly 1,700 lives every day. When I read those stats, I realised how overwhelming it can feel to try understand this disease and why it can feel almost impossible to navigate the science behind it. That is why I invited Professor Thomas Seyfried back to try and understand the science further, question the system and explore what we may still be getting wrong. Thomas has spent 50 years researching cancer. He is a Professor of Biology at Boston College, the author of more than 150 peer-reviewed papers and one of the most passionate people I have met when speaking about this disease. His work explores a metabolic view of cancer. In simpler terms, he believes we need to pay much closer attention to how cancer cells create energy, how their metabolism differs from healthy cells and what that could mean for future research. We discussed things like: - The new research he brought into the studio in a confidential envelope… - How damaged mitochondria could change the way we understand cancer. - The three things he believes matter most for living longer. - Why cutting sugar alone does not fully explain how cancer cells survive. - Where keto can become dangerous or misunderstood?! - Changes he would make if he were responsible for public health. There were moments when I asked Thomas to simplify his explanations and pushed for clarity on what's been demonstrated in research and what still needs further study. That distinction matters. Thomas's work is focused on scientific research, not clinical practice. I left this conversation thinking about how progress often begins - someone asks a question that doesn't fit comfortably inside the existing explanation, then spends decades trying to answer it. Cancer will affect almost every family in some way. This is a challenging conversation, but one I believe is worth hearing in full. *The views expressed are those of the guest and this conversation is intended for general informational purposes only. This podcast and its associated materials should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Steven Bartlett

44,295 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

KAMPALA MUST LEARN TO TAKE A SHOWER. WITH SOAP! Last Friday, Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) cleared the clutter and suddenly -my God -there were trees. Trees! Apparently they had been planted years ago, but like disciplined children in a noisy classroom, they were drowned out by kiosks, bodas, and the choreography of downtown chaos. However, the palm trees lost their lives. Many uprooted. Then someone asked the obvious question: “But why are the roads still brown?” Simple. Enfufu. Dust. Dirt. Mud. A city that wipes its face but hasn’t bathed. Let me take you back to 2005. We were shooting an MTN Uganda TV commercial -"Everywhere You Go" -with a South African crew, Red Pepper Films. Proper kit. Light meters. Cloud readers. Precision. On Colville Street behind Christ the King, they cordoned off the road and did the unthinkable: they washed it. Water. Soap. Brushes. The whole road bathed like it was going for Mass. You should have seen the dirt that came off a road we thought was “clean.” That day taught me something. #Kampala often looks clean -from a distance. From a high-angle drone shot. At night. But zoom in and you see the brown truth settling like a stubborn film. KCCA Hajjat Sharifah Buzeki took a bold first step. The ungazetted kiosks gone. Some boda stages reorganized. Good. But bathing is not splashing water on your face. It is systemic hygiene. Wetting. Soaping. Scrubbing. Drains unclogged. Dust suppressed. Specialized sweepers humming daily. Not ceremonial cleaning -consistent cleaning. In Kigali, when oil spills, they literally soap the road. Scrub it. As if the street itself has dignity. Add Umuganda - the monthly community clean-up - and cleanliness becomes culture, not instruction. It is institutional hygiene. Laws alone won’t save Kampala. Behaviour will. The driver who throws a maize cob out the window and later blames KCCA for the pile. The pedestrian who litters then complains about flooding. The vendor who rejects a market stall in Wandegs, New Ntinda or Nakawa but prefers a makeshift kiosk in the drainage path. Kampala cannot be “anti-water.” We outgrew that label in boarding school. Clean cities are not accidents. They are systems. Shared pride, earned in deed, not speeches. Now that we see trees again, let’s also learn to walk properly. Right side going. Left side coming. Like red ants -siafus -precise, purposeful. No bumping, no wandering across grass we just cleared. Why does Kampala look brown? Because it hasn’t bathed enough. It's about time it did. The solution is not cosmetic. It is commitment. Kampala si bizimbe only. It must be showered. Regularly. Thoroughly. And with intention. Last word: I pray the Uganda Revenue Authority "Tax Payer Support Center" white container by the roadside, (and other similar road side containers) are removed. Electric poles washed/cleaned/painted. Only then will the Pearl stop looking dusty -and start looking deliberately clean. Photos: #kigali, and #Kampala. #ForABetterCity #KibugaKla The Independent 933 KFM Daily Monitor The New Vision Sudhir Byaruhanga Capital FM Uganda

KAMPALA MUST LEARN TO TAKE A SHOWER. WITH SOAP! Last Friday, Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) cleared the clutter and suddenly -my God -there were trees. Trees! Apparently they had been planted years ago, but like disciplined children in a noisy classroom, they were drowned out by kiosks, bodas, and the choreography of downtown chaos. However, the palm trees lost their lives. Many uprooted. Then someone asked the obvious question: “But why are the roads still brown?” Simple. Enfufu. Dust. Dirt. Mud. A city that wipes its face but hasn’t bathed. Let me take you back to 2005. We were shooting an MTN Uganda TV commercial -"Everywhere You Go" -with a South African crew, Red Pepper Films. Proper kit. Light meters. Cloud readers. Precision. On Colville Street behind Christ the King, they cordoned off the road and did the unthinkable: they washed it. Water. Soap. Brushes. The whole road bathed like it was going for Mass. You should have seen the dirt that came off a road we thought was “clean.” That day taught me something. #Kampala often looks clean -from a distance. From a high-angle drone shot. At night. But zoom in and you see the brown truth settling like a stubborn film. KCCA Hajjat Sharifah Buzeki took a bold first step. The ungazetted kiosks gone. Some boda stages reorganized. Good. But bathing is not splashing water on your face. It is systemic hygiene. Wetting. Soaping. Scrubbing. Drains unclogged. Dust suppressed. Specialized sweepers humming daily. Not ceremonial cleaning -consistent cleaning. In Kigali, when oil spills, they literally soap the road. Scrub it. As if the street itself has dignity. Add Umuganda - the monthly community clean-up - and cleanliness becomes culture, not instruction. It is institutional hygiene. Laws alone won’t save Kampala. Behaviour will. The driver who throws a maize cob out the window and later blames KCCA for the pile. The pedestrian who litters then complains about flooding. The vendor who rejects a market stall in Wandegs, New Ntinda or Nakawa but prefers a makeshift kiosk in the drainage path. Kampala cannot be “anti-water.” We outgrew that label in boarding school. Clean cities are not accidents. They are systems. Shared pride, earned in deed, not speeches. Now that we see trees again, let’s also learn to walk properly. Right side going. Left side coming. Like red ants -siafus -precise, purposeful. No bumping, no wandering across grass we just cleared. Why does Kampala look brown? Because it hasn’t bathed enough. It's about time it did. The solution is not cosmetic. It is commitment. Kampala si bizimbe only. It must be showered. Regularly. Thoroughly. And with intention. Last word: I pray the Uganda Revenue Authority "Tax Payer Support Center" white container by the roadside, (and other similar road side containers) are removed. Electric poles washed/cleaned/painted. Only then will the Pearl stop looking dusty -and start looking deliberately clean. Photos: #kigali, and #Kampala. #ForABetterCity #KibugaKla The Independent 933 KFM Daily Monitor The New Vision Sudhir Byaruhanga Capital FM Uganda

Patrick Oyulu

14,993 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Warren Buffett's legendary speech at the University of Georgia. This speech is a great piece on business and investing. But I specifically enjoy it for Buffett's humor and life lessons. Here are some of my favorite points: 1. Don't work for your Resume - Work for someone you admire. Not to upgrade your resume. Working jobs that you hate first sounds to Buffett like: "Saving up sex for when you're old." Focus on learning on the job! 2. Qualities to focus on in Life - Buffett's Thought Experiment: Look around in your classroom, which classmate would you choose when you could keep 10% of his earnings for the rest of your life? Also, think about the inversion of this scenario: Who would you sell short? The characteristics that you focus on when answering these questions are the ones you should focus on in your own life. 3. The Best Compounders are Stable Companies - "The internet won't change how you chew gum." Buffett's biggest successes come from companies that aren't disruptable. Industries that are subject to disruption are a bad spot to look for long-term investments. 4. Go Short Horses, Not Long Cars - Investing is not about spotting the disruptors. In most cases, it's obvious when a life-changing product comes up. The question is, who profits from that change? It was a matter of time before cars replaced horses. But out of hundreds of car companies, only a handful actually succeeded. The same happened in the airline industry. 5. Managing your Circle of Competence - According to Buffett, the key to successful investing is to manage your circle of competence. It's not how big that circle is. More important is that you know your boundaries and always stay within them. 6. The Birds in the Bush - "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush." However, an investor should also ask: 1. How many birds are in the bush? 2. When will they come out? 3. How sure am I? Investing is all about answering these questions. What investing lecture/speech/video can you recommend to me? If you enjoyed this tweet, please Retweet and Like it!

Warren Buffett's legendary speech at the University of Georgia. This speech is a great piece on business and investing. But I specifically enjoy it for Buffett's humor and life lessons. Here are some of my favorite points: 1. Don't work for your Resume - Work for someone you admire. Not to upgrade your resume. Working jobs that you hate first sounds to Buffett like: "Saving up sex for when you're old." Focus on learning on the job! 2. Qualities to focus on in Life - Buffett's Thought Experiment: Look around in your classroom, which classmate would you choose when you could keep 10% of his earnings for the rest of your life? Also, think about the inversion of this scenario: Who would you sell short? The characteristics that you focus on when answering these questions are the ones you should focus on in your own life. 3. The Best Compounders are Stable Companies - "The internet won't change how you chew gum." Buffett's biggest successes come from companies that aren't disruptable. Industries that are subject to disruption are a bad spot to look for long-term investments. 4. Go Short Horses, Not Long Cars - Investing is not about spotting the disruptors. In most cases, it's obvious when a life-changing product comes up. The question is, who profits from that change? It was a matter of time before cars replaced horses. But out of hundreds of car companies, only a handful actually succeeded. The same happened in the airline industry. 5. Managing your Circle of Competence - According to Buffett, the key to successful investing is to manage your circle of competence. It's not how big that circle is. More important is that you know your boundaries and always stay within them. 6. The Birds in the Bush - "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush." However, an investor should also ask: 1. How many birds are in the bush? 2. When will they come out? 3. How sure am I? Investing is all about answering these questions. What investing lecture/speech/video can you recommend to me? If you enjoyed this tweet, please Retweet and Like it!

Daniel Mahncke

138,726 просмотров • 3 лет назад

$Tom Crawshaw has been building automations for 9 years with $25 million in client revenue to his name. He just walked me through his Claude Code content system that's generating millions of views and tens of thousands of followers. Here's what I learned: 1. Skills beat Projects in Claude. Projects load every context file on every message and burn your token window. Skills work like a book where the LLM reads the table of contents and pulls only the chapter it needs for the job. Same context, fraction of the tokens. 2. He has a /content-create slash command that runs the entire pipeline. Voice profile, copywriting principles, hook generation, image direction. One command. He doesn't write anything from scratch anymore. 3. His voice profile auto-updates weekly. He wrote a script that hits the X API every 7 days, pulls his top-performing posts by engagement, and rewrites his voice profile based on what's actually working. The profile evolves on its own. 4. He distilled a master copywriter's entire body of work into a single markdown file. Grabbed every Alen Sultanic post he could find, dropped it into Claude, asked for the core principles, fed it into the skill. Now every post he writes runs through those principles automatically. 5. The hook generator scores 16 hooks per post against 7 criteria. Curiosity loops, specificity, sensory, credibility, voice match, and a couple of others. He never picks the #1 by default. Sometimes he splices the first line of one hook with the body of another. The taste is still his. 6. /insights is a native Claude Code command nobody talks about. It analyzes every session you've ever run and produces a full report on your usage patterns, where things break down, and prompts you can paste back into Claude to fix them. I had never heard of it. I'm running it tonight. 7. He spends most of his time on hooks and images. If those two suck, the body copy doesn't matter. Nobody reads it. 8. Image generation is never one-shot. He keeps a folder of reference images that have worked before and feeds them into Nano Banana/GPT Image 2 every time. Then he takes the 80-90% output and finishes it in Canva using "magic grab" to move logos and clean up text. Last mile is human every time. 9. The humanizer step is non-negotiable. Strip em dashes. Kill the "it's not X, it's Y" pattern. Cut the triple negatives. Cut "no fluff." He still has to remind Claude mid-session because it drifts. If you're not auditing for AI tells, you're shipping slop. 10. Wisprflow is the most important tool in his stack. Not a content tool. An everything tool. His test for whether you should be using it: do you talk faster than you type? You do. Everyone does. Bonus fact he dropped: QWERTY was designed 200 years ago to slow typing down so old typewriters wouldn't jam. We've been carrying that forward ever since. Voice is finally undoing it. This was an inside look at how a serious operator Tom is using Claude Code to run a content engine. The good, the bad, the iteration, all of it. I hope you enjoy this one as much as I did. Go watch it.$

Tom Crawshaw has been building automations for 9 years with $25 million in client revenue to his name. He just walked me through his Claude Code content system that's generating millions of views and tens of thousands of followers. Here's what I learned: 1. Skills beat Projects in Claude. Projects load every context file on every message and burn your token window. Skills work like a book where the LLM reads the table of contents and pulls only the chapter it needs for the job. Same context, fraction of the tokens. 2. He has a /content-create slash command that runs the entire pipeline. Voice profile, copywriting principles, hook generation, image direction. One command. He doesn't write anything from scratch anymore. 3. His voice profile auto-updates weekly. He wrote a script that hits the X API every 7 days, pulls his top-performing posts by engagement, and rewrites his voice profile based on what's actually working. The profile evolves on its own. 4. He distilled a master copywriter's entire body of work into a single markdown file. Grabbed every Alen Sultanic post he could find, dropped it into Claude, asked for the core principles, fed it into the skill. Now every post he writes runs through those principles automatically. 5. The hook generator scores 16 hooks per post against 7 criteria. Curiosity loops, specificity, sensory, credibility, voice match, and a couple of others. He never picks the #1 by default. Sometimes he splices the first line of one hook with the body of another. The taste is still his. 6. /insights is a native Claude Code command nobody talks about. It analyzes every session you've ever run and produces a full report on your usage patterns, where things break down, and prompts you can paste back into Claude to fix them. I had never heard of it. I'm running it tonight. 7. He spends most of his time on hooks and images. If those two suck, the body copy doesn't matter. Nobody reads it. 8. Image generation is never one-shot. He keeps a folder of reference images that have worked before and feeds them into Nano Banana/GPT Image 2 every time. Then he takes the 80-90% output and finishes it in Canva using "magic grab" to move logos and clean up text. Last mile is human every time. 9. The humanizer step is non-negotiable. Strip em dashes. Kill the "it's not X, it's Y" pattern. Cut the triple negatives. Cut "no fluff." He still has to remind Claude mid-session because it drifts. If you're not auditing for AI tells, you're shipping slop. 10. Wisprflow is the most important tool in his stack. Not a content tool. An everything tool. His test for whether you should be using it: do you talk faster than you type? You do. Everyone does. Bonus fact he dropped: QWERTY was designed 200 years ago to slow typing down so old typewriters wouldn't jam. We've been carrying that forward ever since. Voice is finally undoing it. This was an inside look at how a serious operator Tom is using Claude Code to run a content engine. The good, the bad, the iteration, all of it. I hope you enjoy this one as much as I did. Go watch it.

Corey Ganim

36,541 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

In 1997, a developer publicly humiliated Steve Jobs in front of a packed room. Jobs had just returned to Apple after 11 years away. Instead of fighting back, he admitted the guy was partly right — then explained the principle he believed could turn Apple into an $8–10 billion-a-year business. And his answer had almost nothing to do with technology. Most companies, Jobs explained, work backwards. They build something technically impressive, fall in love with what they created, and only then ask how they are going to sell it. He had made that mistake himself so many times that he said he had the “scar tissue” to prove it. His rule was the opposite: start with the customer experience and work backwards to the technology. Jobs used the LaserWriter as an example. Inside the printer were a Canon laser engine, an Apple-designed controller, Adobe PostScript and AppleTalk. It was an extraordinary piece of engineering, but none of that was the reason he believed people would buy it. When the first page came out, Jobs looked at it and realized they didn't need to explain what was inside the machine. They could simply hold up the result and ask one question: Do you want this? That was the entire point. Customers don't pay you for how difficult your product was to build. They pay for what it does for them. A developer tried to expose what Steve Jobs didn't know about technology. Jobs responded by explaining something far more valuable about business.

In 1997, a developer publicly humiliated Steve Jobs in front of a packed room. Jobs had just returned to Apple after 11 years away. Instead of fighting back, he admitted the guy was partly right — then explained the principle he believed could turn Apple into an $8–10 billion-a-year business. And his answer had almost nothing to do with technology. Most companies, Jobs explained, work backwards. They build something technically impressive, fall in love with what they created, and only then ask how they are going to sell it. He had made that mistake himself so many times that he said he had the “scar tissue” to prove it. His rule was the opposite: start with the customer experience and work backwards to the technology. Jobs used the LaserWriter as an example. Inside the printer were a Canon laser engine, an Apple-designed controller, Adobe PostScript and AppleTalk. It was an extraordinary piece of engineering, but none of that was the reason he believed people would buy it. When the first page came out, Jobs looked at it and realized they didn't need to explain what was inside the machine. They could simply hold up the result and ask one question: Do you want this? That was the entire point. Customers don't pay you for how difficult your product was to build. They pay for what it does for them. A developer tried to expose what Steve Jobs didn't know about technology. Jobs responded by explaining something far more valuable about business.

Mr Green

226,953 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Attention , Data and Capital rule WEB3! Kaito AI 🌊 has primed itself as the ultimate distribution center of this three! Here’s how you can make the most of KAITO,a long form post! This guide is my personal strategy to earning yaps and building long term mindshare, ignoring follower count! Let’s get into it: ⸻ What Even Is Yapping? Yapping is posting and engaging on Crypto Twitter in a way that’s: •Web3 relevant •Genuine and thoughtful •Not spammy or low effort •Seen and engaged by high reputation users Yaps are the points you earn from posts and replies, but how you earn them is what I wanna talk about now. How do you Earn Yaps? As I read from the Kaito FAQ, applied, and gotten results from, there are three things that determine how many yaps you earn and when; 1.Reputation weighted engagement: the most important one! 2.Web3 relevance: your posts MUST be relevant in Web3! 3.Insightful and original content: focus on quality over quantity! What does that actually mean? If you post a great crypto thread and no one with a good reputation in CT interacts, you likely get 0 yaps. If you post a viral meme that’s unrelated to crypto, same thing, you get 0 yaps. You need both quality and engagement from strong accounts in the Kaito inner circle. Here’s where the idea of Smart followers comes in, these are accounts with the “Inner Circle Badge” on Twitter. Their interactions on your posts or replies earn you yaps! It’s also important for you to understand Mindshare. Mindshare is simply how much conversation and attention you are able to generate around a specific project. Yaps = fuel. Mindshare = dominance. To build mindshare,: •Focus on 1 to 2 projects MAX. •Post about them 1 to 2 times daily. •Reply often to other Yappers posting about the same project •Engage directly with the project account and their team. •Watch who’s leading the mindshare leaderboard on the KAITO website and learn from their style and content. Note: Early engagement gives you a higher chance to earn more yaps. That’s why I focus on fresh or recently added projects with active or pending leaderboards. Here’s how Pick Projects to Yap About: If you know me, I’m never chasing short term hype, and I focus on long term projects. Here’s how I pick: •Projects I understand or am testing/using myself •Ones that reward Yappers in meaningful ways (roles, cash, recognition) Here are some I’m looking at right now (do your own research too!): •Monad •Lombard •burner •Kaito AI 🌊 •Succinct •Infinex (massive rewards) •Allora •Humanity •OpenLedger (hot competition) What your daily KAITO schedule should look like: 1 to 2 solid tweets per project •No low effort “gm” posts, be intentional about every single post or reply you make! •Focus on your thoughts, project features, new updates 2.Reply to official project tweets, engage on founder and team member’s accounts too! 3.Engage other Yappers talking about the same project,be a good reply guy. 4.Retweet the project’s major posts. 5.Use project specific images. 6.Keep your posts insightful and project relevant! Also, clean up your profile (your bio, banner and pinned tweet must reflect clearly that you’re active in Web3. First impressions matter when people are deciding whether to interact with your profile or not! -Some tips to grow faster as a small account on KAITO. •Subscribe to X Premium (seriously helps with visibility) •Check the Discord of the projects you support for updates. •Track Kaito’s market page to see hot Inner Circle accounts. •Engage with leaderboard users in a genuine way -What Projects should you Yap about? There are 40+ Pre TGE projects you can yap about right now under different sectors AI & Data •Allora •OpenLedger 🔥 •Camp Network •Hyperbolic . Listen to KAITO founder 👇

DUKE 🇲🇾

92,426 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚀 JUNIOR SILVER MINERS: FROM GRAVEYARD TO GENERATIONAL WEALTH. The much-discussed ‘Aisan Guy’ in the silver community is now making videos about silver juniors. I can only confirm what he says here: THE SETUP: MAXIMUM HATRED ✅ For 10 years, this sector has been a graveyard. Sentiment is below zero. ✅ Institutions hate them. Retail is bored. Valuations are at Great Depression levels. ➡️ This is exactly why they are about to explode. The biggest moves come from the most compressed springs. THE MATH: OPERATING LEVERAGE IS MAGIC Imagine a miner with a cost of $20/oz. ➡️ At $22 silver, profit = $2/oz. 🚀 At $30 silver, profit = $10/oz. 💥 Silver rose 36%, but profit rose 400%. 🚀 At $50 silver, profit = $30/oz. 💥 Silver doubled, but profit exploded 1,400%. This is how 10x, 20x, even 50x stock moves happen. The stock chases cash flow. THE CATALYST: A LIQUIDITY SQUEEZE ✅ The float is tiny. Many are micro-caps under $50M. ➡️ When money rotates in—from retail, Wall Street bets, or generalist funds—it’s like pushing an elephant through a keyhole. ⚡ There are no sellers. The price has to gap up. This is a GameStop-style short squeeze, but with a fundamental asset: silver in the ground. THE APE FACTOR: RETAIL TSUNAMI ✅ The Reddit army loves a narrative. "Silver Squeeze 2.0" is tailor-made. ✅ They can’t easily buy physical, so they’ll buy the tickers—the cheap, leveraged junior miners. ✅ Their diamond-hand mentality locks up the already-tight float. The ask disappears. The melt-up begins. THE WARNING: THIS IS A WIDOWMAKER ❌ Bad management, jurisdiction risk, financing risk, and scams are everywhere. ✅ Mitigate with diversification. Buy a basket. Use ETFs. Never bet your mortgage. ✅ Position size wisely. This is the speculative portion of your portfolio. THE EXIT: DON’T BE A BAGHOLDER ✅ Have a plan. Sell into strength. Scale out. ✅ When your Uber driver gives you a stock tip, sell. ✅ Convert paper gains into real assets: land, physical metal, a house. 💡 The goal isn’t to hold miners forever. It’s to use the rocket ship to reach financial freedom—and then get off. THE BOTTOM LINE Junior silver miners are a hated, leveraged, and tiny sector sitting at the epicenter of a potential silver supercycle. The math of operating leverage combined with a possible retail-driven liquidity squeeze could create the most explosive trade of the decade. HT: YouTube finance desk #Silver #JuniorMiners #Investing #Trading #Commodities #Stocks #GameStop #SilverSqueeze

🚀 JUNIOR SILVER MINERS: FROM GRAVEYARD TO GENERATIONAL WEALTH. The much-discussed ‘Aisan Guy’ in the silver community is now making videos about silver juniors. I can only confirm what he says here: THE SETUP: MAXIMUM HATRED ✅ For 10 years, this sector has been a graveyard. Sentiment is below zero. ✅ Institutions hate them. Retail is bored. Valuations are at Great Depression levels. ➡️ This is exactly why they are about to explode. The biggest moves come from the most compressed springs. THE MATH: OPERATING LEVERAGE IS MAGIC Imagine a miner with a cost of $20/oz. ➡️ At $22 silver, profit = $2/oz. 🚀 At $30 silver, profit = $10/oz. 💥 Silver rose 36%, but profit rose 400%. 🚀 At $50 silver, profit = $30/oz. 💥 Silver doubled, but profit exploded 1,400%. This is how 10x, 20x, even 50x stock moves happen. The stock chases cash flow. THE CATALYST: A LIQUIDITY SQUEEZE ✅ The float is tiny. Many are micro-caps under $50M. ➡️ When money rotates in—from retail, Wall Street bets, or generalist funds—it’s like pushing an elephant through a keyhole. ⚡ There are no sellers. The price has to gap up. This is a GameStop-style short squeeze, but with a fundamental asset: silver in the ground. THE APE FACTOR: RETAIL TSUNAMI ✅ The Reddit army loves a narrative. "Silver Squeeze 2.0" is tailor-made. ✅ They can’t easily buy physical, so they’ll buy the tickers—the cheap, leveraged junior miners. ✅ Their diamond-hand mentality locks up the already-tight float. The ask disappears. The melt-up begins. THE WARNING: THIS IS A WIDOWMAKER ❌ Bad management, jurisdiction risk, financing risk, and scams are everywhere. ✅ Mitigate with diversification. Buy a basket. Use ETFs. Never bet your mortgage. ✅ Position size wisely. This is the speculative portion of your portfolio. THE EXIT: DON’T BE A BAGHOLDER ✅ Have a plan. Sell into strength. Scale out. ✅ When your Uber driver gives you a stock tip, sell. ✅ Convert paper gains into real assets: land, physical metal, a house. 💡 The goal isn’t to hold miners forever. It’s to use the rocket ship to reach financial freedom—and then get off. THE BOTTOM LINE Junior silver miners are a hated, leveraged, and tiny sector sitting at the epicenter of a potential silver supercycle. The math of operating leverage combined with a possible retail-driven liquidity squeeze could create the most explosive trade of the decade. HT: YouTube finance desk #Silver #JuniorMiners #Investing #Trading #Commodities #Stocks #GameStop #SilverSqueeze

Mark

51,275 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Here’s the ICE watch training video Cam Higby 🇺🇸 found. Let’s deconstruct the first few minutes. Lead by Eric Ward, a senior fellow at the Southern Poverty Law Center, a far-left NGO with nearly a billion-dollar endowment. His academic work is in “Stochastic terrorism,” which is “using hostile public rhetoric, repeated and amplified across media and communication platforms.” Literally, his expertise is manipulating minds. He’s not an expert on peaceful protests. He’s not an operational guy. His background is in psychological warfare. Participants were told “for their safety” they must “have training,” but this training isn’t about situational awareness, first aid, or practical defense against pepper spray. It’s, in fact, teaching you how to mentally prepare to escalate violence. Let’s look at his tactic. First, a meditation session. Why? To get you “out of your brain” and in “touch with feelings.” He then explicitly tells everyone to tune out everything but their feelings. Next… the four thousand people here are being asked to confront armed federal agents. What is the natural reaction for anyone confronting armed men? Nervousness. I love the police; my father-in-law was an NYPD officer, but my heart beats faster when I’m pulled over by my local PD. He’s telling them to listen to that “heat behind the eyes, tremble in your hands,” which is fine, but then he is lying. He’s telling you to interpret that natural panic when facing authority as moral superiority and your “conscious.” Next, he has to dehumanize opponents and set the stage for “us vs. them,” but this is tricky because almost every American knows a Republican. So he says “I want to be clear who they are,” and he gets very specific so the picture of your MAGA uncle or priest doesn’t enter your mind. Then he states the obvious, which everyone (even MAGA) will agree on: “Renee Good should be alive. Alex Pretti should be alive.” I agree with that statement, but the question is who’s responsible for their deaths. IMHO, the person most responsible is Eric Ward, but of course, he’s not going to blame himself. Then he says, “The people who died at the hands of ICE snd border patrol should be alive.” What people? He doesn’t say. It’s not about the people; it’s about drawing a straight line from Renee and Alex to ICE. Then he says, “Let’s tell the truth.” Which any kindergartener knows is followed by lies, but his listeners are in a trance from the breathing exercise. Listen to the sing-song nature of how he speaks. It’s literally hypnosis. Hypnosis for the BIG whopper lie: “Federal law enforcement is not here to keep us safe.” Really, Eric? Maybe you can make an argument that some federal law enforcement isn’t here to keep us safe… but you didn’t specify. You didn’t exclude organizations like the US Coast Guard, which is federal immigration law enforcement and does keep us safe. Why? Because he needs to paint with broad strokes in case other agencies are called in. Nad now the stage is set to dehumanize: “Federal law enforcement is killing people, beating people…” And the worst lie: “Detaining people like disposable objects.” Once you are hypnotized. Once you trust your feelings over facts. Once you know those feelings make you morally superior. Once you know ICE thinks you are “disposable garbage,” then you are prepared to act with violence! Just trust your feelings and don’t look at the massive endowment the Southern Poverty Law Center has to fund physiological operatives trained in Marxist theory like Eric Ward.

Here’s the ICE watch training video Cam Higby 🇺🇸 found. Let’s deconstruct the first few minutes. Lead by Eric Ward, a senior fellow at the Southern Poverty Law Center, a far-left NGO with nearly a billion-dollar endowment. His academic work is in “Stochastic terrorism,” which is “using hostile public rhetoric, repeated and amplified across media and communication platforms.” Literally, his expertise is manipulating minds. He’s not an expert on peaceful protests. He’s not an operational guy. His background is in psychological warfare. Participants were told “for their safety” they must “have training,” but this training isn’t about situational awareness, first aid, or practical defense against pepper spray. It’s, in fact, teaching you how to mentally prepare to escalate violence. Let’s look at his tactic. First, a meditation session. Why? To get you “out of your brain” and in “touch with feelings.” He then explicitly tells everyone to tune out everything but their feelings. Next… the four thousand people here are being asked to confront armed federal agents. What is the natural reaction for anyone confronting armed men? Nervousness. I love the police; my father-in-law was an NYPD officer, but my heart beats faster when I’m pulled over by my local PD. He’s telling them to listen to that “heat behind the eyes, tremble in your hands,” which is fine, but then he is lying. He’s telling you to interpret that natural panic when facing authority as moral superiority and your “conscious.” Next, he has to dehumanize opponents and set the stage for “us vs. them,” but this is tricky because almost every American knows a Republican. So he says “I want to be clear who they are,” and he gets very specific so the picture of your MAGA uncle or priest doesn’t enter your mind. Then he states the obvious, which everyone (even MAGA) will agree on: “Renee Good should be alive. Alex Pretti should be alive.” I agree with that statement, but the question is who’s responsible for their deaths. IMHO, the person most responsible is Eric Ward, but of course, he’s not going to blame himself. Then he says, “The people who died at the hands of ICE snd border patrol should be alive.” What people? He doesn’t say. It’s not about the people; it’s about drawing a straight line from Renee and Alex to ICE. Then he says, “Let’s tell the truth.” Which any kindergartener knows is followed by lies, but his listeners are in a trance from the breathing exercise. Listen to the sing-song nature of how he speaks. It’s literally hypnosis. Hypnosis for the BIG whopper lie: “Federal law enforcement is not here to keep us safe.” Really, Eric? Maybe you can make an argument that some federal law enforcement isn’t here to keep us safe… but you didn’t specify. You didn’t exclude organizations like the US Coast Guard, which is federal immigration law enforcement and does keep us safe. Why? Because he needs to paint with broad strokes in case other agencies are called in. Nad now the stage is set to dehumanize: “Federal law enforcement is killing people, beating people…” And the worst lie: “Detaining people like disposable objects.” Once you are hypnotized. Once you trust your feelings over facts. Once you know those feelings make you morally superior. Once you know ICE thinks you are “disposable garbage,” then you are prepared to act with violence! Just trust your feelings and don’t look at the massive endowment the Southern Poverty Law Center has to fund physiological operatives trained in Marxist theory like Eric Ward.

John Ʌ Konrad V

230,051 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

MORE WHITE HOUSE GASLIGHTING (jobs edition) *Taps sign* remember this quoted Tweet? They're getting out in front of the delayed release now because they know the number is going to be ABYSSMAL. Here we have Peter Navarro doing pre-emptive damage control. "We have to revise our expectations down significantly for what a monthly job number SHOULD look like". Peter saying that a monthly job number should look terrible. That's weird, I thought in great economies job numbers looked good. Peter then goes on to claim that the number is going to reflect "millions of illegals out of the job market". There's just one problem with that: Illegal aliens aren't factored into the NFP BLS numbers. Because illegal aliens don't have social security numbers. So aside from his claim that Trump has deported "millions" of illegal aliens, he's now blaming those same illegals for tanking jobs reports that, if the illegals were being deported, that would be SKYROCKETING as US citizens claimed those roles. People who have been following me for a while know how I talked about my belief the 2025 government shutdown was primarily to mask the horrible NFP employment numbers that were going to come out right during the heart of the shutdown. A theory I think most people accept at this point. New followers have seen me talk about the January layoff numbers and how exceptionally high they were. The February jobs number delay was just so they could frame their messaging ahead of its release. Remember, the BLS chair right now is a guy who does everything he can to fake the numbers to make it look best for the administration, and even THAT isn't going to help them. They're lying right to your face and aren't even trying to make it believable.

MORE WHITE HOUSE GASLIGHTING (jobs edition) Taps sign remember this quoted Tweet? They're getting out in front of the delayed release now because they know the number is going to be ABYSSMAL. Here we have Peter Navarro doing pre-emptive damage control. "We have to revise our expectations down significantly for what a monthly job number SHOULD look like". Peter saying that a monthly job number should look terrible. That's weird, I thought in great economies job numbers looked good. Peter then goes on to claim that the number is going to reflect "millions of illegals out of the job market". There's just one problem with that: Illegal aliens aren't factored into the NFP BLS numbers. Because illegal aliens don't have social security numbers. So aside from his claim that Trump has deported "millions" of illegal aliens, he's now blaming those same illegals for tanking jobs reports that, if the illegals were being deported, that would be SKYROCKETING as US citizens claimed those roles. People who have been following me for a while know how I talked about my belief the 2025 government shutdown was primarily to mask the horrible NFP employment numbers that were going to come out right during the heart of the shutdown. A theory I think most people accept at this point. New followers have seen me talk about the January layoff numbers and how exceptionally high they were. The February jobs number delay was just so they could frame their messaging ahead of its release. Remember, the BLS chair right now is a guy who does everything he can to fake the numbers to make it look best for the administration, and even THAT isn't going to help them. They're lying right to your face and aren't even trying to make it believable.

BonkDaCarnivore

15,176 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад