Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Quick Question — How much does your favorite Rolex guy sell his Chapati? Responsible waste management begins at generation. Sharifah Buzeki — Hajjat Sharifah Buzeki 📢 Quoted post (tweet) = Context. #ForALivableCity

KCCAUG's profile picture

Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA)

332,925 subscribers

21,455 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

#ForALivableCity
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

But surely, why would you go to a supermarket to buy a toothbrush and accept a polythene bag? 🤔 Sharifah Buzeki — Hajjat Sharifah Buzeki 📢 REFUSE waste #ForALivableCity
1:32

But surely, why would you go to a supermarket to buy a toothbrush and accept a polythene bag? 🤔 Sharifah Buzeki — Hajjat Sharifah Buzeki 📢 REFUSE waste #ForALivableCity

Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA)

83,831 views • 4 months ago

Vern Terrell runs Terrell Ranches in Hay Springs, Nebraska. His family settled there in 1948 on 100 acres. Through intensive grazing management, he's added the equivalent of HALF A RANCH to his operation — without buying more land. He saw a chart tracking four generations of farm families nationwide. 120 families in generation one. 22 by generation two. Nine by generation three. And by generation four, projections show just four of those original families still farming. 120 families. Four left. The old rancher who mentored him said: "To succeed in agriculture, you either have to be better than your neighbor at what he does, or you have to do something that nobody else wants to do." Grazing management was his answer. Nebraska Sandhills blow out if you don't keep cover on them. He heals blowouts with waste hay and round bales, lets the native seed already in the ground take hold. "The land's getting out of control of family farms and ranches. It's going to investors and big multi-dollar people. We need to keep as many family farms as we can." The ranchers who figure out how to produce more from the same acres are the ones still standing.
2:39

Vern Terrell runs Terrell Ranches in Hay Springs, Nebraska. His family settled there in 1948 on 100 acres. Through intensive grazing management, he's added the equivalent of HALF A RANCH to his operation — without buying more land. He saw a chart tracking four generations of farm families nationwide. 120 families in generation one. 22 by generation two. Nine by generation three. And by generation four, projections show just four of those original families still farming. 120 families. Four left. The old rancher who mentored him said: "To succeed in agriculture, you either have to be better than your neighbor at what he does, or you have to do something that nobody else wants to do." Grazing management was his answer. Nebraska Sandhills blow out if you don't keep cover on them. He heals blowouts with waste hay and round bales, lets the native seed already in the ground take hold. "The land's getting out of control of family farms and ranches. It's going to investors and big multi-dollar people. We need to keep as many family farms as we can." The ranchers who figure out how to produce more from the same acres are the ones still standing.

SAVE BEEF 🇺🇸 BeefMaps.com

11,210 views • 17 days ago

WTF, THIS GUY STOPPED REPLYING TO HIS FRIENDS ON IMESSAGE. NOW HIS HERMES AI AGENT DOES IT FOR HIM AND THEY CAN’T TELL THE DIFFERENCE. Every time he gets a text, Hermes drafts a reply first. He never sends that draft. Instead, he writes his actual response and Hermes compares the two. The gap between what Hermes predicted and what he actually said becomes the training signal. Over time, that gap closes. The agent's drafts get closer and closer to exactly how he talks. His reasoning: email is performative. iMessage is where your real, unfiltered voice actually lives. Most people training AI to sound like them feed it formal writing – essays, emails, LinkedIn posts. That's not how anyone actually talks. This approach trains on the messiest, most honest version of someone's communication style. Quick replies. Half-finished thoughts. The way you actually text your friends. The result is an AI that doesn't write like a corporate version of you. It writes like you, texting at 11pm. This is what real personalization actually looks like, not a prompt that says "sound casual." Bookmark this post. Full breakdown in the video below.
0:32

WTF, THIS GUY STOPPED REPLYING TO HIS FRIENDS ON IMESSAGE. NOW HIS HERMES AI AGENT DOES IT FOR HIM AND THEY CAN’T TELL THE DIFFERENCE. Every time he gets a text, Hermes drafts a reply first. He never sends that draft. Instead, he writes his actual response and Hermes compares the two. The gap between what Hermes predicted and what he actually said becomes the training signal. Over time, that gap closes. The agent's drafts get closer and closer to exactly how he talks. His reasoning: email is performative. iMessage is where your real, unfiltered voice actually lives. Most people training AI to sound like them feed it formal writing – essays, emails, LinkedIn posts. That's not how anyone actually talks. This approach trains on the messiest, most honest version of someone's communication style. Quick replies. Half-finished thoughts. The way you actually text your friends. The result is an AI that doesn't write like a corporate version of you. It writes like you, texting at 11pm. This is what real personalization actually looks like, not a prompt that says "sound casual." Bookmark this post. Full breakdown in the video below.

SCOTTY BEAM

45,406 views • 1 month ago

This guy took a brand‑new app to #1 overall in the App Store and 1,000,000 downloads in under 3 days. For the FIRST TIME, he breaks down exactly how he did it, and we’re posting the full, RAW conversation right here on X To be clear, this is his first and only podcast on this playbook... And a little more context: this wasn’t luck. Jibran has taken 4 different apps to #1 in the App Store, including one that did $1.5M in 3 days and outranked ChatGPT He did it with a handful of creators, zero paid ads, and a product philosophy that blew my mind Here’s the core of what he taught me: > Your product and your marketing are not two separate things; they're the same thing. > What goes viral on TikTok is product validation. > What you learn from a hit video should change your UI, your App Store screenshots, your icon He ran that loop obsessively.. For his 2025 Wrapped app, he spent hundreds of hours in Figma asking one question: > “How does this look on TikTok?” Then he tracked: 1. What users screenshotted 2. What they shared to Snapchat 3. What slide they dropped off on The result was a #1 overall app in the App Store. Above EVERYTHING. Now he’s building because he realized he was spending hours every day doom‑scrolling TikTok looking for hooks and formats that worked So he built an AI to do it for him: > You tell it your app. > It tells you what to post, what’s trending in your niche, and what’s wrong with your existing videos. We go deep on all of it in this conversation. If you run a consumer app, this is the most useful 49 minutes you’ll spend this week
49:02

This guy took a brand‑new app to #1 overall in the App Store and 1,000,000 downloads in under 3 days. For the FIRST TIME, he breaks down exactly how he did it, and we’re posting the full, RAW conversation right here on X To be clear, this is his first and only podcast on this playbook... And a little more context: this wasn’t luck. Jibran has taken 4 different apps to #1 in the App Store, including one that did $1.5M in 3 days and outranked ChatGPT He did it with a handful of creators, zero paid ads, and a product philosophy that blew my mind Here’s the core of what he taught me: > Your product and your marketing are not two separate things; they're the same thing. > What goes viral on TikTok is product validation. > What you learn from a hit video should change your UI, your App Store screenshots, your icon He ran that loop obsessively.. For his 2025 Wrapped app, he spent hundreds of hours in Figma asking one question: > “How does this look on TikTok?” Then he tracked: 1. What users screenshotted 2. What they shared to Snapchat 3. What slide they dropped off on The result was a #1 overall app in the App Store. Above EVERYTHING. Now he’s building because he realized he was spending hours every day doom‑scrolling TikTok looking for hooks and formats that worked So he built an AI to do it for him: > You tell it your app. > It tells you what to post, what’s trending in your niche, and what’s wrong with your existing videos. We go deep on all of it in this conversation. If you run a consumer app, this is the most useful 49 minutes you’ll spend this week

Alex Olim

106,009 views • 4 months ago

openai and anthropic probably have terrible sales reps they're talented, but they've never actually had to sell anything. ben horowitz said it best in a recent conversation: "right now with openai and anthropic, everybody wants to buy ai. they're already predisposed to buy." that's order-taking, not selling. let's zoom in on this distinction. 1) the order-taker problem cloudflare's CEO admitted in 2023 their product was so good that "many of our sales team succeeded largely by just taking orders." deals were like "fish jumping right in the boat." then the economy shifted and they fired 100 salespeople who'd contributed just 4% of new business. when your product sells itself, mediocre reps look like rockstars. they crush quota, win the president's club, and get promoted into leadership. nobody knows they can't actually sell until the fish stop jumping in the boat. 2) why hard sells matter ben won't shut up about ptc, a 90s cad/cam company. the product "wasn't that great." "the windshield wiper didn't work." but that forced discipline. you had to map accounts systematically, lay traps for competitors, and build airtight technical cases. his favorite hire was ryan gabrisco at databricks, who came from a company selling secure ftp as a public company. think about how good you have to be to make quota selling that. when ben hires sales leaders, he looks for people from companies where the product was hard to sell because that's the only way to test if someone can actually sell. 3) what happens when markets turn every hot market eventually cools. i'll give you a few examples. salesforce in 2001. facebook ads in 2012. aws in 2015. the order-takers got exposed every time. modern AI sales reps don't know how to qualify prospects who aren't already sold or how to systematically lock out competitors or how to build pipeline when inbound dries up. ben's story about hiring at Okta: two candidates, one super enthusiastic, the other said "let me talk to your customers first." ben told the ceo: "you want the guy qualifying YOU. that's what good salespeople do." 4) openai scaled their sales team from 10 to 500 people in under two years. anthropic is scaling fast too. but how would anyone know if they're good? you can't test sales ability when customers are lined up begging to buy. when real competition arrives, the kind where enterprises have three viable options and care about pricing, support, and vendor risk, AI companies will discover which GTM leaders can actually sell and which ones were just processing waitlists. 5) how to hire right if you're building a GTM team right now, think like a value investor. resumes don't matter. look for human capital that the market has significantly underpriced. someone who's had to sell a product that didn't sell itself, someone who's built discipline through necessity, not abundance (no order-takers). find the person who sold enterprise software at a company nobody's heard of. find the person who had to fight for every deal because the competitor was already embedded in the account. the person who figured out how to systematically lock out competition even when they were the underdog. those skills matter. for AI companies, the question is whether they can close deals when the market shifts. because when inbound dries up (it always does), you'll discover who can actually sell.
1:39

openai and anthropic probably have terrible sales reps they're talented, but they've never actually had to sell anything. ben horowitz said it best in a recent conversation: "right now with openai and anthropic, everybody wants to buy ai. they're already predisposed to buy." that's order-taking, not selling. let's zoom in on this distinction. 1) the order-taker problem cloudflare's CEO admitted in 2023 their product was so good that "many of our sales team succeeded largely by just taking orders." deals were like "fish jumping right in the boat." then the economy shifted and they fired 100 salespeople who'd contributed just 4% of new business. when your product sells itself, mediocre reps look like rockstars. they crush quota, win the president's club, and get promoted into leadership. nobody knows they can't actually sell until the fish stop jumping in the boat. 2) why hard sells matter ben won't shut up about ptc, a 90s cad/cam company. the product "wasn't that great." "the windshield wiper didn't work." but that forced discipline. you had to map accounts systematically, lay traps for competitors, and build airtight technical cases. his favorite hire was ryan gabrisco at databricks, who came from a company selling secure ftp as a public company. think about how good you have to be to make quota selling that. when ben hires sales leaders, he looks for people from companies where the product was hard to sell because that's the only way to test if someone can actually sell. 3) what happens when markets turn every hot market eventually cools. i'll give you a few examples. salesforce in 2001. facebook ads in 2012. aws in 2015. the order-takers got exposed every time. modern AI sales reps don't know how to qualify prospects who aren't already sold or how to systematically lock out competitors or how to build pipeline when inbound dries up. ben's story about hiring at Okta: two candidates, one super enthusiastic, the other said "let me talk to your customers first." ben told the ceo: "you want the guy qualifying YOU. that's what good salespeople do." 4) openai scaled their sales team from 10 to 500 people in under two years. anthropic is scaling fast too. but how would anyone know if they're good? you can't test sales ability when customers are lined up begging to buy. when real competition arrives, the kind where enterprises have three viable options and care about pricing, support, and vendor risk, AI companies will discover which GTM leaders can actually sell and which ones were just processing waitlists. 5) how to hire right if you're building a GTM team right now, think like a value investor. resumes don't matter. look for human capital that the market has significantly underpriced. someone who's had to sell a product that didn't sell itself, someone who's built discipline through necessity, not abundance (no order-takers). find the person who sold enterprise software at a company nobody's heard of. find the person who had to fight for every deal because the competitor was already embedded in the account. the person who figured out how to systematically lock out competition even when they were the underdog. those skills matter. for AI companies, the question is whether they can close deals when the market shifts. because when inbound dries up (it always does), you'll discover who can actually sell.

Courtne Marland

250,859 views • 4 months ago

I’m so tired of these endless comparisons. Tell me honestly, does it truly matter how much a brand’s items cost? Is love for an artist measured by the numbers on a price tag? Is pride defined by a price list? When Jungkook has a new collaboration, I don’t care who’s wearing what or who outdid whom, I write only about him. And you, by the way, do too. He partnered with Calvin Klein and you called it "oh, just mass market". Then you saw the scale and the way the brand treated him and suddenly you wanted the same for your artists. You dreamed of Chanel, but Chanel chose him. And he didn’t agree for the sake of a prestigious name. He agreed because he felt their history, their aesthetic, their spirit. Jungkook doesn’t accept everything that’s offered. He doesn’t work for status. He chooses what resonates with his inner self. Now it’s Hublot and once again the race begins. Rushing to Rolex, to Patek, asking them to make your artists ambassadors. But why? So you can compare again tomorrow? Sometimes it feels like you stand beside your artists for competition, not for them and there is so little warmth in that. True love celebrates without conditions and without the need to prove anything. Jungkook began working with brands later than the others and I was proud of him at every stage: while in 2023 others were flying to fashion weeks, he was going live from his room and my whole world shrank to the size of my phone screen. I didn’t care who was where, with whom, or how much. We already had what mattered most. We had him. We, his fans, have always had more. Not because of brands, not because of campaigns and certainly not because of flashy titles. We have more because we have Jungkook. A person who spent hours with us. Who sang live for us. Who cooked, laughed, fell asleep and woke up with us on stream. Who shared something real, unfiltered, unscripted, alive. His humanity. His talent. His open gaze and clear mind. His grace, his taste, his depth. That is what we value. Even if tomorrow all the brands disappear, all the campaigns, all the headlines, the most important thing will remain. Jungkook. He is an artist and he possesses what truly matters for a singer and what endures forever. Genuine talent, a beautiful voice and the ability to master it. Everything else is simply a beautiful backdrop. It does not define him. It only reflects his influence, his values, his relevance. The background does not elevate him. He elevates everything he touches. It’s unfortunate that no matter how much you speak about your artists’ unique talents, in the end you see only the backdrop. If that’s how you measure value, then a simple question remains: what will happen when the backdrop is gone? When the logos disappear. When the lights go out. When there are no comparison charts and no race for prestige. Will the voice remain? Will the stage remain? Will the artist remain on their own, without decoration? True talent is not afraid of silence. A real personality does not need support beams. Authenticity does not collapse without glitter. And if, without the backdrop, there is emptiness, then perhaps all along you were never admiring the artist. You were admiring the scenery around them. And that is the saddest difference of all. The real distinction is not in brands or price tags. It lies in the fact that Jungkook does not stand on decorations, the decorations stand on him. You can compete in contracts, calculate the cost of watches, and compare lists of brands. But you cannot outrun sincerity, surpass natural charisma, or outshine someone who is equally powerful in a stadium and in the quiet of his room. His strength is not external, it lies in what remains when everything else fades: the voice without a stage, the gaze without lights, the presence without noise. It cannot be built by contracts, bought, or engineered. It either exists or it doesn’t. That is the difference. And in that, no one will ever outrun #JUNGKOOK. WE LOVE YOU JUNGKOOK ♥️
0:28

I’m so tired of these endless comparisons. Tell me honestly, does it truly matter how much a brand’s items cost? Is love for an artist measured by the numbers on a price tag? Is pride defined by a price list? When Jungkook has a new collaboration, I don’t care who’s wearing what or who outdid whom, I write only about him. And you, by the way, do too. He partnered with Calvin Klein and you called it "oh, just mass market". Then you saw the scale and the way the brand treated him and suddenly you wanted the same for your artists. You dreamed of Chanel, but Chanel chose him. And he didn’t agree for the sake of a prestigious name. He agreed because he felt their history, their aesthetic, their spirit. Jungkook doesn’t accept everything that’s offered. He doesn’t work for status. He chooses what resonates with his inner self. Now it’s Hublot and once again the race begins. Rushing to Rolex, to Patek, asking them to make your artists ambassadors. But why? So you can compare again tomorrow? Sometimes it feels like you stand beside your artists for competition, not for them and there is so little warmth in that. True love celebrates without conditions and without the need to prove anything. Jungkook began working with brands later than the others and I was proud of him at every stage: while in 2023 others were flying to fashion weeks, he was going live from his room and my whole world shrank to the size of my phone screen. I didn’t care who was where, with whom, or how much. We already had what mattered most. We had him. We, his fans, have always had more. Not because of brands, not because of campaigns and certainly not because of flashy titles. We have more because we have Jungkook. A person who spent hours with us. Who sang live for us. Who cooked, laughed, fell asleep and woke up with us on stream. Who shared something real, unfiltered, unscripted, alive. His humanity. His talent. His open gaze and clear mind. His grace, his taste, his depth. That is what we value. Even if tomorrow all the brands disappear, all the campaigns, all the headlines, the most important thing will remain. Jungkook. He is an artist and he possesses what truly matters for a singer and what endures forever. Genuine talent, a beautiful voice and the ability to master it. Everything else is simply a beautiful backdrop. It does not define him. It only reflects his influence, his values, his relevance. The background does not elevate him. He elevates everything he touches. It’s unfortunate that no matter how much you speak about your artists’ unique talents, in the end you see only the backdrop. If that’s how you measure value, then a simple question remains: what will happen when the backdrop is gone? When the logos disappear. When the lights go out. When there are no comparison charts and no race for prestige. Will the voice remain? Will the stage remain? Will the artist remain on their own, without decoration? True talent is not afraid of silence. A real personality does not need support beams. Authenticity does not collapse without glitter. And if, without the backdrop, there is emptiness, then perhaps all along you were never admiring the artist. You were admiring the scenery around them. And that is the saddest difference of all. The real distinction is not in brands or price tags. It lies in the fact that Jungkook does not stand on decorations, the decorations stand on him. You can compete in contracts, calculate the cost of watches, and compare lists of brands. But you cannot outrun sincerity, surpass natural charisma, or outshine someone who is equally powerful in a stadium and in the quiet of his room. His strength is not external, it lies in what remains when everything else fades: the voice without a stage, the gaze without lights, the presence without noise. It cannot be built by contracts, bought, or engineered. It either exists or it doesn’t. That is the difference. And in that, no one will ever outrun #JUNGKOOK. WE LOVE YOU JUNGKOOK ♥️

𝕁𝕌ℕ𝔾𝕂𝕆𝕆𝕂 | ℂ𝕀𝕊 𝔽𝔸ℕ𝔹𝔸𝕊𝔼

50,474 views • 6 months ago

Late last year, Palmer Luckey flew his helicopter to my office for a quick chat. He sported one of his signature Hawaiian shirts, but instead of his usual flip-flops, he wore what looked like a pair of heavy-duty socks with individual slots for each toe. Kind of like a glove for your feet. “Flying the helicopter requires a lot of footwork,” he said. “These give me a better feel for the pedals.” As you may know, Palmer Luckey is the virtual reality guy who started a company called Oculus when he was in his twenties and sold it to Facebook a few years later for a couple billion dollars. He has since gone on to do a number of interesting things, including starting a company called Anduril, which manufactures state-of-the-art weapons and a variety of autonomous systems for the United States military. I first met Palmer back in April at an energy conference in Laguna Beach. He showed up at that event on a motorcycle, wearing a jacket made entirely of copper. “It’s the perfect jacket for motorcycle riding,” he told me. “Much tougher than leather if you have a spill.” “How much does it weigh?” I asked. “Five pounds,” he said. “I like it because copper is an anti-microbial, so it never gets moldy. Plus, I can put my phone in the pocket, and it acts like a Faraday cage. Nobody can track me.” Obviously, we had a fascinating conversation about a number of topics, including how to win future wars, deindustrialize our manufacturing base, and reinvigorate the skilled trades. Along with a plan to eliminate the TSA, and some Hobbit-related sidebars. A short clip is attached. Our whole conversation is here. It's a good one...
2:26

Late last year, Palmer Luckey flew his helicopter to my office for a quick chat. He sported one of his signature Hawaiian shirts, but instead of his usual flip-flops, he wore what looked like a pair of heavy-duty socks with individual slots for each toe. Kind of like a glove for your feet. “Flying the helicopter requires a lot of footwork,” he said. “These give me a better feel for the pedals.” As you may know, Palmer Luckey is the virtual reality guy who started a company called Oculus when he was in his twenties and sold it to Facebook a few years later for a couple billion dollars. He has since gone on to do a number of interesting things, including starting a company called Anduril, which manufactures state-of-the-art weapons and a variety of autonomous systems for the United States military. I first met Palmer back in April at an energy conference in Laguna Beach. He showed up at that event on a motorcycle, wearing a jacket made entirely of copper. “It’s the perfect jacket for motorcycle riding,” he told me. “Much tougher than leather if you have a spill.” “How much does it weigh?” I asked. “Five pounds,” he said. “I like it because copper is an anti-microbial, so it never gets moldy. Plus, I can put my phone in the pocket, and it acts like a Faraday cage. Nobody can track me.” Obviously, we had a fascinating conversation about a number of topics, including how to win future wars, deindustrialize our manufacturing base, and reinvigorate the skilled trades. Along with a plan to eliminate the TSA, and some Hobbit-related sidebars. A short clip is attached. Our whole conversation is here. It's a good one...

The Real Mike Rowe

467,330 views • 7 months ago

The debate about Clavicular boils down to one question: What does it mean to be Jewish? Yes, we’re losing the PR Battle, but do we—as Jews—sell our souls to win the PR Battle? We recognize people hate us, but does that mean we have to change? Absolutely not. They’ll hate us either way, so we must not change. Again, we can’t change who we are just to placate larger society and social media. Worse though, this instinct that we have to subsume our values at the altar of social media is an easily falsifiable premise disproven by one man: Ben Shapiro. Ben Shapiro has sold out every single one of his campus tours and talks for the last decade. Campus tours. As in, for young people. The same people Clavicular reaches and influences. But unlike Calvicular, Shapiro hasn’t done that by changing who he is or by shedding his core Jewish values. No! He’s done it by staying true to himself, by staying true to traditional Jewish values. Are we seriously trying to tell the younger generation that—as Jews—it’s better to be arsim and mogg your way through Tel Aviv or do you think we should point to the guy who runs a wildly successful and influential media company, sells out all his campus dates, and just had his fifth child? As Jews, the answer is simple: Stop promoting vanity. Stop excusing degeneracy. These aren’t Jewish values. If we change who we are just to win the PR Battle then we’ll lose no matter what. Plus, when it’s all said and done, not only is Ben Shapiro the better man, he can do more pull ups than Clavicular. I want the real deal, not a brittle show pony.
3:20

The debate about Clavicular boils down to one question: What does it mean to be Jewish? Yes, we’re losing the PR Battle, but do we—as Jews—sell our souls to win the PR Battle? We recognize people hate us, but does that mean we have to change? Absolutely not. They’ll hate us either way, so we must not change. Again, we can’t change who we are just to placate larger society and social media. Worse though, this instinct that we have to subsume our values at the altar of social media is an easily falsifiable premise disproven by one man: Ben Shapiro. Ben Shapiro has sold out every single one of his campus tours and talks for the last decade. Campus tours. As in, for young people. The same people Clavicular reaches and influences. But unlike Calvicular, Shapiro hasn’t done that by changing who he is or by shedding his core Jewish values. No! He’s done it by staying true to himself, by staying true to traditional Jewish values. Are we seriously trying to tell the younger generation that—as Jews—it’s better to be arsim and mogg your way through Tel Aviv or do you think we should point to the guy who runs a wildly successful and influential media company, sells out all his campus dates, and just had his fifth child? As Jews, the answer is simple: Stop promoting vanity. Stop excusing degeneracy. These aren’t Jewish values. If we change who we are just to win the PR Battle then we’ll lose no matter what. Plus, when it’s all said and done, not only is Ben Shapiro the better man, he can do more pull ups than Clavicular. I want the real deal, not a brittle show pony.

Jake Donnelly

13,517 views • 1 month ago

Every hour, 70 people die from cancer in the United States. That’s roughly 1,700 lives every day. When I read those stats, I realised how overwhelming it can feel to try understand this disease and why it can feel almost impossible to navigate the science behind it. That is why I invited Professor Thomas Seyfried back to try and understand the science further, question the system and explore what we may still be getting wrong. Thomas has spent 50 years researching cancer. He is a Professor of Biology at Boston College, the author of more than 150 peer-reviewed papers and one of the most passionate people I have met when speaking about this disease. His work explores a metabolic view of cancer. In simpler terms, he believes we need to pay much closer attention to how cancer cells create energy, how their metabolism differs from healthy cells and what that could mean for future research. We discussed things like: - The new research he brought into the studio in a confidential envelope… - How damaged mitochondria could change the way we understand cancer. - The three things he believes matter most for living longer. - Why cutting sugar alone does not fully explain how cancer cells survive. - Where keto can become dangerous or misunderstood?! - Changes he would make if he were responsible for public health. There were moments when I asked Thomas to simplify his explanations and pushed for clarity on what's been demonstrated in research and what still needs further study. That distinction matters. Thomas's work is focused on scientific research, not clinical practice. I left this conversation thinking about how progress often begins - someone asks a question that doesn't fit comfortably inside the existing explanation, then spends decades trying to answer it. Cancer will affect almost every family in some way. This is a challenging conversation, but one I believe is worth hearing in full. *The views expressed are those of the guest and this conversation is intended for general informational purposes only. This podcast and its associated materials should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
1:45

Every hour, 70 people die from cancer in the United States. That’s roughly 1,700 lives every day. When I read those stats, I realised how overwhelming it can feel to try understand this disease and why it can feel almost impossible to navigate the science behind it. That is why I invited Professor Thomas Seyfried back to try and understand the science further, question the system and explore what we may still be getting wrong. Thomas has spent 50 years researching cancer. He is a Professor of Biology at Boston College, the author of more than 150 peer-reviewed papers and one of the most passionate people I have met when speaking about this disease. His work explores a metabolic view of cancer. In simpler terms, he believes we need to pay much closer attention to how cancer cells create energy, how their metabolism differs from healthy cells and what that could mean for future research. We discussed things like: - The new research he brought into the studio in a confidential envelope… - How damaged mitochondria could change the way we understand cancer. - The three things he believes matter most for living longer. - Why cutting sugar alone does not fully explain how cancer cells survive. - Where keto can become dangerous or misunderstood?! - Changes he would make if he were responsible for public health. There were moments when I asked Thomas to simplify his explanations and pushed for clarity on what's been demonstrated in research and what still needs further study. That distinction matters. Thomas's work is focused on scientific research, not clinical practice. I left this conversation thinking about how progress often begins - someone asks a question that doesn't fit comfortably inside the existing explanation, then spends decades trying to answer it. Cancer will affect almost every family in some way. This is a challenging conversation, but one I believe is worth hearing in full. *The views expressed are those of the guest and this conversation is intended for general informational purposes only. This podcast and its associated materials should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Steven Bartlett

43,246 views • 29 days ago

Warren Buffett's legendary speech at the University of Georgia. This speech is a great piece on business and investing. But I specifically enjoy it for Buffett's humor and life lessons. Here are some of my favorite points: 1. Don't work for your Resume - Work for someone you admire. Not to upgrade your resume. Working jobs that you hate first sounds to Buffett like: "Saving up sex for when you're old." Focus on learning on the job! 2. Qualities to focus on in Life - Buffett's Thought Experiment: Look around in your classroom, which classmate would you choose when you could keep 10% of his earnings for the rest of your life? Also, think about the inversion of this scenario: Who would you sell short? The characteristics that you focus on when answering these questions are the ones you should focus on in your own life. 3. The Best Compounders are Stable Companies - "The internet won't change how you chew gum." Buffett's biggest successes come from companies that aren't disruptable. Industries that are subject to disruption are a bad spot to look for long-term investments. 4. Go Short Horses, Not Long Cars - Investing is not about spotting the disruptors. In most cases, it's obvious when a life-changing product comes up. The question is, who profits from that change? It was a matter of time before cars replaced horses. But out of hundreds of car companies, only a handful actually succeeded. The same happened in the airline industry. 5. Managing your Circle of Competence - According to Buffett, the key to successful investing is to manage your circle of competence. It's not how big that circle is. More important is that you know your boundaries and always stay within them. 6. The Birds in the Bush - "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush." However, an investor should also ask: 1. How many birds are in the bush? 2. When will they come out? 3. How sure am I? Investing is all about answering these questions. What investing lecture/speech/video can you recommend to me? If you enjoyed this tweet, please Retweet and Like it!
1:17:09

Warren Buffett's legendary speech at the University of Georgia. This speech is a great piece on business and investing. But I specifically enjoy it for Buffett's humor and life lessons. Here are some of my favorite points: 1. Don't work for your Resume - Work for someone you admire. Not to upgrade your resume. Working jobs that you hate first sounds to Buffett like: "Saving up sex for when you're old." Focus on learning on the job! 2. Qualities to focus on in Life - Buffett's Thought Experiment: Look around in your classroom, which classmate would you choose when you could keep 10% of his earnings for the rest of your life? Also, think about the inversion of this scenario: Who would you sell short? The characteristics that you focus on when answering these questions are the ones you should focus on in your own life. 3. The Best Compounders are Stable Companies - "The internet won't change how you chew gum." Buffett's biggest successes come from companies that aren't disruptable. Industries that are subject to disruption are a bad spot to look for long-term investments. 4. Go Short Horses, Not Long Cars - Investing is not about spotting the disruptors. In most cases, it's obvious when a life-changing product comes up. The question is, who profits from that change? It was a matter of time before cars replaced horses. But out of hundreds of car companies, only a handful actually succeeded. The same happened in the airline industry. 5. Managing your Circle of Competence - According to Buffett, the key to successful investing is to manage your circle of competence. It's not how big that circle is. More important is that you know your boundaries and always stay within them. 6. The Birds in the Bush - "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush." However, an investor should also ask: 1. How many birds are in the bush? 2. When will they come out? 3. How sure am I? Investing is all about answering these questions. What investing lecture/speech/video can you recommend to me? If you enjoyed this tweet, please Retweet and Like it!

Daniel Mahncke

138,552 views • 3 years ago

KAMPALA MUST LEARN TO TAKE A SHOWER. WITH SOAP! Last Friday, Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) cleared the clutter and suddenly -my God -there were trees. Trees! Apparently they had been planted years ago, but like disciplined children in a noisy classroom, they were drowned out by kiosks, bodas, and the choreography of downtown chaos. However, the palm trees lost their lives. Many uprooted. Then someone asked the obvious question: “But why are the roads still brown?” Simple. Enfufu. Dust. Dirt. Mud. A city that wipes its face but hasn’t bathed. Let me take you back to 2005. We were shooting an MTN Uganda TV commercial -"Everywhere You Go" -with a South African crew, Red Pepper Films. Proper kit. Light meters. Cloud readers. Precision. On Colville Street behind Christ the King, they cordoned off the road and did the unthinkable: they washed it. Water. Soap. Brushes. The whole road bathed like it was going for Mass. You should have seen the dirt that came off a road we thought was “clean.” That day taught me something. #Kampala often looks clean -from a distance. From a high-angle drone shot. At night. But zoom in and you see the brown truth settling like a stubborn film. KCCA Hajjat Sharifah Buzeki took a bold first step. The ungazetted kiosks gone. Some boda stages reorganized. Good. But bathing is not splashing water on your face. It is systemic hygiene. Wetting. Soaping. Scrubbing. Drains unclogged. Dust suppressed. Specialized sweepers humming daily. Not ceremonial cleaning -consistent cleaning. In Kigali, when oil spills, they literally soap the road. Scrub it. As if the street itself has dignity. Add Umuganda - the monthly community clean-up - and cleanliness becomes culture, not instruction. It is institutional hygiene. Laws alone won’t save Kampala. Behaviour will. The driver who throws a maize cob out the window and later blames KCCA for the pile. The pedestrian who litters then complains about flooding. The vendor who rejects a market stall in Wandegs, New Ntinda or Nakawa but prefers a makeshift kiosk in the drainage path. Kampala cannot be “anti-water.” We outgrew that label in boarding school. Clean cities are not accidents. They are systems. Shared pride, earned in deed, not speeches. Now that we see trees again, let’s also learn to walk properly. Right side going. Left side coming. Like red ants -siafus -precise, purposeful. No bumping, no wandering across grass we just cleared. Why does Kampala look brown? Because it hasn’t bathed enough. It's about time it did. The solution is not cosmetic. It is commitment. Kampala si bizimbe only. It must be showered. Regularly. Thoroughly. And with intention. Last word: I pray the Uganda Revenue Authority "Tax Payer Support Center" white container by the roadside, (and other similar road side containers) are removed. Electric poles washed/cleaned/painted. Only then will the Pearl stop looking dusty -and start looking deliberately clean. Photos: #kigali, and #Kampala. #ForABetterCity #KibugaKla The Independent 933 KFM Daily Monitor The New Vision Sudhir Byaruhanga Capital FM Uganda
0:34

KAMPALA MUST LEARN TO TAKE A SHOWER. WITH SOAP! Last Friday, Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) cleared the clutter and suddenly -my God -there were trees. Trees! Apparently they had been planted years ago, but like disciplined children in a noisy classroom, they were drowned out by kiosks, bodas, and the choreography of downtown chaos. However, the palm trees lost their lives. Many uprooted. Then someone asked the obvious question: “But why are the roads still brown?” Simple. Enfufu. Dust. Dirt. Mud. A city that wipes its face but hasn’t bathed. Let me take you back to 2005. We were shooting an MTN Uganda TV commercial -"Everywhere You Go" -with a South African crew, Red Pepper Films. Proper kit. Light meters. Cloud readers. Precision. On Colville Street behind Christ the King, they cordoned off the road and did the unthinkable: they washed it. Water. Soap. Brushes. The whole road bathed like it was going for Mass. You should have seen the dirt that came off a road we thought was “clean.” That day taught me something. #Kampala often looks clean -from a distance. From a high-angle drone shot. At night. But zoom in and you see the brown truth settling like a stubborn film. KCCA Hajjat Sharifah Buzeki took a bold first step. The ungazetted kiosks gone. Some boda stages reorganized. Good. But bathing is not splashing water on your face. It is systemic hygiene. Wetting. Soaping. Scrubbing. Drains unclogged. Dust suppressed. Specialized sweepers humming daily. Not ceremonial cleaning -consistent cleaning. In Kigali, when oil spills, they literally soap the road. Scrub it. As if the street itself has dignity. Add Umuganda - the monthly community clean-up - and cleanliness becomes culture, not instruction. It is institutional hygiene. Laws alone won’t save Kampala. Behaviour will. The driver who throws a maize cob out the window and later blames KCCA for the pile. The pedestrian who litters then complains about flooding. The vendor who rejects a market stall in Wandegs, New Ntinda or Nakawa but prefers a makeshift kiosk in the drainage path. Kampala cannot be “anti-water.” We outgrew that label in boarding school. Clean cities are not accidents. They are systems. Shared pride, earned in deed, not speeches. Now that we see trees again, let’s also learn to walk properly. Right side going. Left side coming. Like red ants -siafus -precise, purposeful. No bumping, no wandering across grass we just cleared. Why does Kampala look brown? Because it hasn’t bathed enough. It's about time it did. The solution is not cosmetic. It is commitment. Kampala si bizimbe only. It must be showered. Regularly. Thoroughly. And with intention. Last word: I pray the Uganda Revenue Authority "Tax Payer Support Center" white container by the roadside, (and other similar road side containers) are removed. Electric poles washed/cleaned/painted. Only then will the Pearl stop looking dusty -and start looking deliberately clean. Photos: #kigali, and #Kampala. #ForABetterCity #KibugaKla The Independent 933 KFM Daily Monitor The New Vision Sudhir Byaruhanga Capital FM Uganda

Patrick Oyulu

14,924 views • 5 months ago

Tom Crawshaw has been building automations for 9 years with $25 million in client revenue to his name. He just walked me through his Claude Code content system that's generating millions of views and tens of thousands of followers. Here's what I learned: 1. Skills beat Projects in Claude. Projects load every context file on every message and burn your token window. Skills work like a book where the LLM reads the table of contents and pulls only the chapter it needs for the job. Same context, fraction of the tokens. 2. He has a /content-create slash command that runs the entire pipeline. Voice profile, copywriting principles, hook generation, image direction. One command. He doesn't write anything from scratch anymore. 3. His voice profile auto-updates weekly. He wrote a script that hits the X API every 7 days, pulls his top-performing posts by engagement, and rewrites his voice profile based on what's actually working. The profile evolves on its own. 4. He distilled a master copywriter's entire body of work into a single markdown file. Grabbed every Alen Sultanic post he could find, dropped it into Claude, asked for the core principles, fed it into the skill. Now every post he writes runs through those principles automatically. 5. The hook generator scores 16 hooks per post against 7 criteria. Curiosity loops, specificity, sensory, credibility, voice match, and a couple of others. He never picks the #1 by default. Sometimes he splices the first line of one hook with the body of another. The taste is still his. 6. /insights is a native Claude Code command nobody talks about. It analyzes every session you've ever run and produces a full report on your usage patterns, where things break down, and prompts you can paste back into Claude to fix them. I had never heard of it. I'm running it tonight. 7. He spends most of his time on hooks and images. If those two suck, the body copy doesn't matter. Nobody reads it. 8. Image generation is never one-shot. He keeps a folder of reference images that have worked before and feeds them into Nano Banana/GPT Image 2 every time. Then he takes the 80-90% output and finishes it in Canva using "magic grab" to move logos and clean up text. Last mile is human every time. 9. The humanizer step is non-negotiable. Strip em dashes. Kill the "it's not X, it's Y" pattern. Cut the triple negatives. Cut "no fluff." He still has to remind Claude mid-session because it drifts. If you're not auditing for AI tells, you're shipping slop. 10. Wisprflow is the most important tool in his stack. Not a content tool. An everything tool. His test for whether you should be using it: do you talk faster than you type? You do. Everyone does. Bonus fact he dropped: QWERTY was designed 200 years ago to slow typing down so old typewriters wouldn't jam. We've been carrying that forward ever since. Voice is finally undoing it. This was an inside look at how a serious operator Tom is using Claude Code to run a content engine. The good, the bad, the iteration, all of it. I hope you enjoy this one as much as I did. Go watch it.
57:27

Tom Crawshaw has been building automations for 9 years with $25 million in client revenue to his name. He just walked me through his Claude Code content system that's generating millions of views and tens of thousands of followers. Here's what I learned: 1. Skills beat Projects in Claude. Projects load every context file on every message and burn your token window. Skills work like a book where the LLM reads the table of contents and pulls only the chapter it needs for the job. Same context, fraction of the tokens. 2. He has a /content-create slash command that runs the entire pipeline. Voice profile, copywriting principles, hook generation, image direction. One command. He doesn't write anything from scratch anymore. 3. His voice profile auto-updates weekly. He wrote a script that hits the X API every 7 days, pulls his top-performing posts by engagement, and rewrites his voice profile based on what's actually working. The profile evolves on its own. 4. He distilled a master copywriter's entire body of work into a single markdown file. Grabbed every Alen Sultanic post he could find, dropped it into Claude, asked for the core principles, fed it into the skill. Now every post he writes runs through those principles automatically. 5. The hook generator scores 16 hooks per post against 7 criteria. Curiosity loops, specificity, sensory, credibility, voice match, and a couple of others. He never picks the #1 by default. Sometimes he splices the first line of one hook with the body of another. The taste is still his. 6. /insights is a native Claude Code command nobody talks about. It analyzes every session you've ever run and produces a full report on your usage patterns, where things break down, and prompts you can paste back into Claude to fix them. I had never heard of it. I'm running it tonight. 7. He spends most of his time on hooks and images. If those two suck, the body copy doesn't matter. Nobody reads it. 8. Image generation is never one-shot. He keeps a folder of reference images that have worked before and feeds them into Nano Banana/GPT Image 2 every time. Then he takes the 80-90% output and finishes it in Canva using "magic grab" to move logos and clean up text. Last mile is human every time. 9. The humanizer step is non-negotiable. Strip em dashes. Kill the "it's not X, it's Y" pattern. Cut the triple negatives. Cut "no fluff." He still has to remind Claude mid-session because it drifts. If you're not auditing for AI tells, you're shipping slop. 10. Wisprflow is the most important tool in his stack. Not a content tool. An everything tool. His test for whether you should be using it: do you talk faster than you type? You do. Everyone does. Bonus fact he dropped: QWERTY was designed 200 years ago to slow typing down so old typewriters wouldn't jam. We've been carrying that forward ever since. Voice is finally undoing it. This was an inside look at how a serious operator Tom is using Claude Code to run a content engine. The good, the bad, the iteration, all of it. I hope you enjoy this one as much as I did. Go watch it.

Corey Ganim

36,120 views • 3 months ago

Attention , Data and Capital rule WEB3! Kaito AI 🌊 has primed itself as the ultimate distribution center of this three! Here’s how you can make the most of KAITO,a long form post! This guide is my personal strategy to earning yaps and building long term mindshare, ignoring follower count! Let’s get into it: ⸻ What Even Is Yapping? Yapping is posting and engaging on Crypto Twitter in a way that’s: •Web3 relevant •Genuine and thoughtful •Not spammy or low effort •Seen and engaged by high reputation users Yaps are the points you earn from posts and replies, but how you earn them is what I wanna talk about now. How do you Earn Yaps? As I read from the Kaito FAQ, applied, and gotten results from, there are three things that determine how many yaps you earn and when; 1.Reputation weighted engagement: the most important one! 2.Web3 relevance: your posts MUST be relevant in Web3! 3.Insightful and original content: focus on quality over quantity! What does that actually mean? If you post a great crypto thread and no one with a good reputation in CT interacts, you likely get 0 yaps. If you post a viral meme that’s unrelated to crypto, same thing, you get 0 yaps. You need both quality and engagement from strong accounts in the Kaito inner circle. Here’s where the idea of Smart followers comes in, these are accounts with the “Inner Circle Badge” on Twitter. Their interactions on your posts or replies earn you yaps! It’s also important for you to understand Mindshare. Mindshare is simply how much conversation and attention you are able to generate around a specific project. Yaps = fuel. Mindshare = dominance. To build mindshare,: •Focus on 1 to 2 projects MAX. •Post about them 1 to 2 times daily. •Reply often to other Yappers posting about the same project •Engage directly with the project account and their team. •Watch who’s leading the mindshare leaderboard on the KAITO website and learn from their style and content. Note: Early engagement gives you a higher chance to earn more yaps. That’s why I focus on fresh or recently added projects with active or pending leaderboards. Here’s how Pick Projects to Yap About: If you know me, I’m never chasing short term hype, and I focus on long term projects. Here’s how I pick: •Projects I understand or am testing/using myself •Ones that reward Yappers in meaningful ways (roles, cash, recognition) Here are some I’m looking at right now (do your own research too!): •Monad •Lombard •burner •Kaito AI 🌊 •Succinct •Infinex (massive rewards) •Allora •Humanity •OpenLedger (hot competition) What your daily KAITO schedule should look like: 1 to 2 solid tweets per project •No low effort “gm” posts, be intentional about every single post or reply you make! •Focus on your thoughts, project features, new updates 2.Reply to official project tweets, engage on founder and team member’s accounts too! 3.Engage other Yappers talking about the same project,be a good reply guy. 4.Retweet the project’s major posts. 5.Use project specific images. 6.Keep your posts insightful and project relevant! Also, clean up your profile (your bio, banner and pinned tweet must reflect clearly that you’re active in Web3. First impressions matter when people are deciding whether to interact with your profile or not! -Some tips to grow faster as a small account on KAITO. •Subscribe to X Premium (seriously helps with visibility) •Check the Discord of the projects you support for updates. •Track Kaito’s market page to see hot Inner Circle accounts. •Engage with leaderboard users in a genuine way -What Projects should you Yap about? There are 40+ Pre TGE projects you can yap about right now under different sectors AI & Data •Allora •OpenLedger 🔥 •Camp Network •Hyperbolic . Listen to KAITO founder 👇
2:50

Attention , Data and Capital rule WEB3! Kaito AI 🌊 has primed itself as the ultimate distribution center of this three! Here’s how you can make the most of KAITO,a long form post! This guide is my personal strategy to earning yaps and building long term mindshare, ignoring follower count! Let’s get into it: ⸻ What Even Is Yapping? Yapping is posting and engaging on Crypto Twitter in a way that’s: •Web3 relevant •Genuine and thoughtful •Not spammy or low effort •Seen and engaged by high reputation users Yaps are the points you earn from posts and replies, but how you earn them is what I wanna talk about now. How do you Earn Yaps? As I read from the Kaito FAQ, applied, and gotten results from, there are three things that determine how many yaps you earn and when; 1.Reputation weighted engagement: the most important one! 2.Web3 relevance: your posts MUST be relevant in Web3! 3.Insightful and original content: focus on quality over quantity! What does that actually mean? If you post a great crypto thread and no one with a good reputation in CT interacts, you likely get 0 yaps. If you post a viral meme that’s unrelated to crypto, same thing, you get 0 yaps. You need both quality and engagement from strong accounts in the Kaito inner circle. Here’s where the idea of Smart followers comes in, these are accounts with the “Inner Circle Badge” on Twitter. Their interactions on your posts or replies earn you yaps! It’s also important for you to understand Mindshare. Mindshare is simply how much conversation and attention you are able to generate around a specific project. Yaps = fuel. Mindshare = dominance. To build mindshare,: •Focus on 1 to 2 projects MAX. •Post about them 1 to 2 times daily. •Reply often to other Yappers posting about the same project •Engage directly with the project account and their team. •Watch who’s leading the mindshare leaderboard on the KAITO website and learn from their style and content. Note: Early engagement gives you a higher chance to earn more yaps. That’s why I focus on fresh or recently added projects with active or pending leaderboards. Here’s how Pick Projects to Yap About: If you know me, I’m never chasing short term hype, and I focus on long term projects. Here’s how I pick: •Projects I understand or am testing/using myself •Ones that reward Yappers in meaningful ways (roles, cash, recognition) Here are some I’m looking at right now (do your own research too!): •Monad •Lombard •burner •Kaito AI 🌊 •Succinct •Infinex (massive rewards) •Allora •Humanity •OpenLedger (hot competition) What your daily KAITO schedule should look like: 1 to 2 solid tweets per project •No low effort “gm” posts, be intentional about every single post or reply you make! •Focus on your thoughts, project features, new updates 2.Reply to official project tweets, engage on founder and team member’s accounts too! 3.Engage other Yappers talking about the same project,be a good reply guy. 4.Retweet the project’s major posts. 5.Use project specific images. 6.Keep your posts insightful and project relevant! Also, clean up your profile (your bio, banner and pinned tweet must reflect clearly that you’re active in Web3. First impressions matter when people are deciding whether to interact with your profile or not! -Some tips to grow faster as a small account on KAITO. •Subscribe to X Premium (seriously helps with visibility) •Check the Discord of the projects you support for updates. •Track Kaito’s market page to see hot Inner Circle accounts. •Engage with leaderboard users in a genuine way -What Projects should you Yap about? There are 40+ Pre TGE projects you can yap about right now under different sectors AI & Data •Allora •OpenLedger 🔥 •Camp Network •Hyperbolic . Listen to KAITO founder 👇

DUKE 🇲🇾

92,358 views • 1 year ago

🚀 JUNIOR SILVER MINERS: FROM GRAVEYARD TO GENERATIONAL WEALTH. The much-discussed ‘Aisan Guy’ in the silver community is now making videos about silver juniors. I can only confirm what he says here: THE SETUP: MAXIMUM HATRED ✅ For 10 years, this sector has been a graveyard. Sentiment is below zero. ✅ Institutions hate them. Retail is bored. Valuations are at Great Depression levels. ➡️ This is exactly why they are about to explode. The biggest moves come from the most compressed springs. THE MATH: OPERATING LEVERAGE IS MAGIC Imagine a miner with a cost of $20/oz. ➡️ At $22 silver, profit = $2/oz. 🚀 At $30 silver, profit = $10/oz. 💥 Silver rose 36%, but profit rose 400%. 🚀 At $50 silver, profit = $30/oz. 💥 Silver doubled, but profit exploded 1,400%. This is how 10x, 20x, even 50x stock moves happen. The stock chases cash flow. THE CATALYST: A LIQUIDITY SQUEEZE ✅ The float is tiny. Many are micro-caps under $50M. ➡️ When money rotates in—from retail, Wall Street bets, or generalist funds—it’s like pushing an elephant through a keyhole. ⚡ There are no sellers. The price has to gap up. This is a GameStop-style short squeeze, but with a fundamental asset: silver in the ground. THE APE FACTOR: RETAIL TSUNAMI ✅ The Reddit army loves a narrative. "Silver Squeeze 2.0" is tailor-made. ✅ They can’t easily buy physical, so they’ll buy the tickers—the cheap, leveraged junior miners. ✅ Their diamond-hand mentality locks up the already-tight float. The ask disappears. The melt-up begins. THE WARNING: THIS IS A WIDOWMAKER ❌ Bad management, jurisdiction risk, financing risk, and scams are everywhere. ✅ Mitigate with diversification. Buy a basket. Use ETFs. Never bet your mortgage. ✅ Position size wisely. This is the speculative portion of your portfolio. THE EXIT: DON’T BE A BAGHOLDER ✅ Have a plan. Sell into strength. Scale out. ✅ When your Uber driver gives you a stock tip, sell. ✅ Convert paper gains into real assets: land, physical metal, a house. 💡 The goal isn’t to hold miners forever. It’s to use the rocket ship to reach financial freedom—and then get off. THE BOTTOM LINE Junior silver miners are a hated, leveraged, and tiny sector sitting at the epicenter of a potential silver supercycle. The math of operating leverage combined with a possible retail-driven liquidity squeeze could create the most explosive trade of the decade. HT: YouTube finance desk #Silver #JuniorMiners #Investing #Trading #Commodities #Stocks #GameStop #SilverSqueeze
0:24

🚀 JUNIOR SILVER MINERS: FROM GRAVEYARD TO GENERATIONAL WEALTH. The much-discussed ‘Aisan Guy’ in the silver community is now making videos about silver juniors. I can only confirm what he says here: THE SETUP: MAXIMUM HATRED ✅ For 10 years, this sector has been a graveyard. Sentiment is below zero. ✅ Institutions hate them. Retail is bored. Valuations are at Great Depression levels. ➡️ This is exactly why they are about to explode. The biggest moves come from the most compressed springs. THE MATH: OPERATING LEVERAGE IS MAGIC Imagine a miner with a cost of $20/oz. ➡️ At $22 silver, profit = $2/oz. 🚀 At $30 silver, profit = $10/oz. 💥 Silver rose 36%, but profit rose 400%. 🚀 At $50 silver, profit = $30/oz. 💥 Silver doubled, but profit exploded 1,400%. This is how 10x, 20x, even 50x stock moves happen. The stock chases cash flow. THE CATALYST: A LIQUIDITY SQUEEZE ✅ The float is tiny. Many are micro-caps under $50M. ➡️ When money rotates in—from retail, Wall Street bets, or generalist funds—it’s like pushing an elephant through a keyhole. ⚡ There are no sellers. The price has to gap up. This is a GameStop-style short squeeze, but with a fundamental asset: silver in the ground. THE APE FACTOR: RETAIL TSUNAMI ✅ The Reddit army loves a narrative. "Silver Squeeze 2.0" is tailor-made. ✅ They can’t easily buy physical, so they’ll buy the tickers—the cheap, leveraged junior miners. ✅ Their diamond-hand mentality locks up the already-tight float. The ask disappears. The melt-up begins. THE WARNING: THIS IS A WIDOWMAKER ❌ Bad management, jurisdiction risk, financing risk, and scams are everywhere. ✅ Mitigate with diversification. Buy a basket. Use ETFs. Never bet your mortgage. ✅ Position size wisely. This is the speculative portion of your portfolio. THE EXIT: DON’T BE A BAGHOLDER ✅ Have a plan. Sell into strength. Scale out. ✅ When your Uber driver gives you a stock tip, sell. ✅ Convert paper gains into real assets: land, physical metal, a house. 💡 The goal isn’t to hold miners forever. It’s to use the rocket ship to reach financial freedom—and then get off. THE BOTTOM LINE Junior silver miners are a hated, leveraged, and tiny sector sitting at the epicenter of a potential silver supercycle. The math of operating leverage combined with a possible retail-driven liquidity squeeze could create the most explosive trade of the decade. HT: YouTube finance desk #Silver #JuniorMiners #Investing #Trading #Commodities #Stocks #GameStop #SilverSqueeze

Mark

51,275 views • 7 months ago

Here’s the ICE watch training video Cam Higby 🇺🇸 found. Let’s deconstruct the first few minutes. Lead by Eric Ward, a senior fellow at the Southern Poverty Law Center, a far-left NGO with nearly a billion-dollar endowment. His academic work is in “Stochastic terrorism,” which is “using hostile public rhetoric, repeated and amplified across media and communication platforms.” Literally, his expertise is manipulating minds. He’s not an expert on peaceful protests. He’s not an operational guy. His background is in psychological warfare. Participants were told “for their safety” they must “have training,” but this training isn’t about situational awareness, first aid, or practical defense against pepper spray. It’s, in fact, teaching you how to mentally prepare to escalate violence. Let’s look at his tactic. First, a meditation session. Why? To get you “out of your brain” and in “touch with feelings.” He then explicitly tells everyone to tune out everything but their feelings. Next… the four thousand people here are being asked to confront armed federal agents. What is the natural reaction for anyone confronting armed men? Nervousness. I love the police; my father-in-law was an NYPD officer, but my heart beats faster when I’m pulled over by my local PD. He’s telling them to listen to that “heat behind the eyes, tremble in your hands,” which is fine, but then he is lying. He’s telling you to interpret that natural panic when facing authority as moral superiority and your “conscious.” Next, he has to dehumanize opponents and set the stage for “us vs. them,” but this is tricky because almost every American knows a Republican. So he says “I want to be clear who they are,” and he gets very specific so the picture of your MAGA uncle or priest doesn’t enter your mind. Then he states the obvious, which everyone (even MAGA) will agree on: “Renee Good should be alive. Alex Pretti should be alive.” I agree with that statement, but the question is who’s responsible for their deaths. IMHO, the person most responsible is Eric Ward, but of course, he’s not going to blame himself. Then he says, “The people who died at the hands of ICE snd border patrol should be alive.” What people? He doesn’t say. It’s not about the people; it’s about drawing a straight line from Renee and Alex to ICE. Then he says, “Let’s tell the truth.” Which any kindergartener knows is followed by lies, but his listeners are in a trance from the breathing exercise. Listen to the sing-song nature of how he speaks. It’s literally hypnosis. Hypnosis for the BIG whopper lie: “Federal law enforcement is not here to keep us safe.” Really, Eric? Maybe you can make an argument that some federal law enforcement isn’t here to keep us safe… but you didn’t specify. You didn’t exclude organizations like the US Coast Guard, which is federal immigration law enforcement and does keep us safe. Why? Because he needs to paint with broad strokes in case other agencies are called in. Nad now the stage is set to dehumanize: “Federal law enforcement is killing people, beating people…” And the worst lie: “Detaining people like disposable objects.” Once you are hypnotized. Once you trust your feelings over facts. Once you know those feelings make you morally superior. Once you know ICE thinks you are “disposable garbage,” then you are prepared to act with violence! Just trust your feelings and don’t look at the massive endowment the Southern Poverty Law Center has to fund physiological operatives trained in Marxist theory like Eric Ward.
1:58

Here’s the ICE watch training video Cam Higby 🇺🇸 found. Let’s deconstruct the first few minutes. Lead by Eric Ward, a senior fellow at the Southern Poverty Law Center, a far-left NGO with nearly a billion-dollar endowment. His academic work is in “Stochastic terrorism,” which is “using hostile public rhetoric, repeated and amplified across media and communication platforms.” Literally, his expertise is manipulating minds. He’s not an expert on peaceful protests. He’s not an operational guy. His background is in psychological warfare. Participants were told “for their safety” they must “have training,” but this training isn’t about situational awareness, first aid, or practical defense against pepper spray. It’s, in fact, teaching you how to mentally prepare to escalate violence. Let’s look at his tactic. First, a meditation session. Why? To get you “out of your brain” and in “touch with feelings.” He then explicitly tells everyone to tune out everything but their feelings. Next… the four thousand people here are being asked to confront armed federal agents. What is the natural reaction for anyone confronting armed men? Nervousness. I love the police; my father-in-law was an NYPD officer, but my heart beats faster when I’m pulled over by my local PD. He’s telling them to listen to that “heat behind the eyes, tremble in your hands,” which is fine, but then he is lying. He’s telling you to interpret that natural panic when facing authority as moral superiority and your “conscious.” Next, he has to dehumanize opponents and set the stage for “us vs. them,” but this is tricky because almost every American knows a Republican. So he says “I want to be clear who they are,” and he gets very specific so the picture of your MAGA uncle or priest doesn’t enter your mind. Then he states the obvious, which everyone (even MAGA) will agree on: “Renee Good should be alive. Alex Pretti should be alive.” I agree with that statement, but the question is who’s responsible for their deaths. IMHO, the person most responsible is Eric Ward, but of course, he’s not going to blame himself. Then he says, “The people who died at the hands of ICE snd border patrol should be alive.” What people? He doesn’t say. It’s not about the people; it’s about drawing a straight line from Renee and Alex to ICE. Then he says, “Let’s tell the truth.” Which any kindergartener knows is followed by lies, but his listeners are in a trance from the breathing exercise. Listen to the sing-song nature of how he speaks. It’s literally hypnosis. Hypnosis for the BIG whopper lie: “Federal law enforcement is not here to keep us safe.” Really, Eric? Maybe you can make an argument that some federal law enforcement isn’t here to keep us safe… but you didn’t specify. You didn’t exclude organizations like the US Coast Guard, which is federal immigration law enforcement and does keep us safe. Why? Because he needs to paint with broad strokes in case other agencies are called in. Nad now the stage is set to dehumanize: “Federal law enforcement is killing people, beating people…” And the worst lie: “Detaining people like disposable objects.” Once you are hypnotized. Once you trust your feelings over facts. Once you know those feelings make you morally superior. Once you know ICE thinks you are “disposable garbage,” then you are prepared to act with violence! Just trust your feelings and don’t look at the massive endowment the Southern Poverty Law Center has to fund physiological operatives trained in Marxist theory like Eric Ward.

John Ʌ Konrad V

229,826 views • 6 months ago

MORE WHITE HOUSE GASLIGHTING (jobs edition) *Taps sign* remember this quoted Tweet? They're getting out in front of the delayed release now because they know the number is going to be ABYSSMAL. Here we have Peter Navarro doing pre-emptive damage control. "We have to revise our expectations down significantly for what a monthly job number SHOULD look like". Peter saying that a monthly job number should look terrible. That's weird, I thought in great economies job numbers looked good. Peter then goes on to claim that the number is going to reflect "millions of illegals out of the job market". There's just one problem with that: Illegal aliens aren't factored into the NFP BLS numbers. Because illegal aliens don't have social security numbers. So aside from his claim that Trump has deported "millions" of illegal aliens, he's now blaming those same illegals for tanking jobs reports that, if the illegals were being deported, that would be SKYROCKETING as US citizens claimed those roles. People who have been following me for a while know how I talked about my belief the 2025 government shutdown was primarily to mask the horrible NFP employment numbers that were going to come out right during the heart of the shutdown. A theory I think most people accept at this point. New followers have seen me talk about the January layoff numbers and how exceptionally high they were. The February jobs number delay was just so they could frame their messaging ahead of its release. Remember, the BLS chair right now is a guy who does everything he can to fake the numbers to make it look best for the administration, and even THAT isn't going to help them. They're lying right to your face and aren't even trying to make it believable.
1:10

MORE WHITE HOUSE GASLIGHTING (jobs edition) *Taps sign* remember this quoted Tweet? They're getting out in front of the delayed release now because they know the number is going to be ABYSSMAL. Here we have Peter Navarro doing pre-emptive damage control. "We have to revise our expectations down significantly for what a monthly job number SHOULD look like". Peter saying that a monthly job number should look terrible. That's weird, I thought in great economies job numbers looked good. Peter then goes on to claim that the number is going to reflect "millions of illegals out of the job market". There's just one problem with that: Illegal aliens aren't factored into the NFP BLS numbers. Because illegal aliens don't have social security numbers. So aside from his claim that Trump has deported "millions" of illegal aliens, he's now blaming those same illegals for tanking jobs reports that, if the illegals were being deported, that would be SKYROCKETING as US citizens claimed those roles. People who have been following me for a while know how I talked about my belief the 2025 government shutdown was primarily to mask the horrible NFP employment numbers that were going to come out right during the heart of the shutdown. A theory I think most people accept at this point. New followers have seen me talk about the January layoff numbers and how exceptionally high they were. The February jobs number delay was just so they could frame their messaging ahead of its release. Remember, the BLS chair right now is a guy who does everything he can to fake the numbers to make it look best for the administration, and even THAT isn't going to help them. They're lying right to your face and aren't even trying to make it believable.

BonkDaCarnivore

15,176 views • 6 months ago

“You didn’t read it”.. Burry’s favorite response to any criticism of his $PLTR article Okay, how about we address a direct paragraph from you about Palantir’s ontology: “What Palantir calls its ontology is essentially this data retrieval for use through a common platform. But what if, as the paper points out, LLMs can still confabulate around a piece of data, misinterpret it, ignore it, etc.? In that case, Palantir's ontology cannot overcome the core hallucination problem in the underlying LLMs AIP uses. Hallucinations and overconfidence are fatal to tasks such as legal reasoning, scientific reasoning, medical decision support, military targeting, and other truly mission critical tasks requiring 100% precision and confidence grounded in real data. The paper notes no current mitigation - including the RAG architecture central to AlP - can reliably solve this problem.” What if this. What if that. If my aunt had a dick, she’d be my uncle. We can do “what if” for eternity. How about we look at the impact? - You question the validity of Palantir’s software helping find Bin Laden. Okay, how about the confirmation here of Palantir’s software being used during the Venezuela operation? Thoughts? They could’ve swapped Claude for Grok. Doesn’t matter. They could not have swapped Palantir’s software for something else, though. The LLMs that you point out Palantir does not have, are a commodity. - How about this other example of the 18th Airborne Corps' artillery brigade reducing its targeting process from 724 minutes to 20 minutes with Palantir’s Maven Smart System? Is the ontology hallucinating there? - How about the Navy’s ShipOS, built on Palantir, decreasing schedule planning from 160 hours to 10 minutes? - What about the director of NATO’s Task Force Maven citing how critical the ontology here? “To capitalize on Al applications, an ontology and lineage for data is needed. Al applications don't understand context or meaning; they understand structure. A data ontology provides the machine With a common language and framework for defining concepts, their attributes and their relationships (for example, classifying a 'jet' as an 'air platform' with specific 'weapon systems'). Without this shared structure, an Al model trained on one system's terminology wouldn't be able to integrate data from another. MSS establishes this common schema across NATO systems, unlocking the possibility of interoperable Al applications. This interoperability and trust are paramount in a warfighting context.”: Which is more credible? Your Stanford paper, or a director at NATO who actually uses the software? You wrote 10,000 words, so it’s impossible to dissect the whole thing. If one tries to do so, you will just say they didn’t read it. So let’s take a look at this ontology paragraph specifically. Do you have any proof of the ontology failing? Or just this “what if” from a Stanford paper? There’s infinite examples of it being transformational.. that’s for sure.
1:59

“You didn’t read it”.. Burry’s favorite response to any criticism of his $PLTR article Okay, how about we address a direct paragraph from you about Palantir’s ontology: “What Palantir calls its ontology is essentially this data retrieval for use through a common platform. But what if, as the paper points out, LLMs can still confabulate around a piece of data, misinterpret it, ignore it, etc.? In that case, Palantir's ontology cannot overcome the core hallucination problem in the underlying LLMs AIP uses. Hallucinations and overconfidence are fatal to tasks such as legal reasoning, scientific reasoning, medical decision support, military targeting, and other truly mission critical tasks requiring 100% precision and confidence grounded in real data. The paper notes no current mitigation - including the RAG architecture central to AlP - can reliably solve this problem.” What if this. What if that. If my aunt had a dick, she’d be my uncle. We can do “what if” for eternity. How about we look at the impact? - You question the validity of Palantir’s software helping find Bin Laden. Okay, how about the confirmation here of Palantir’s software being used during the Venezuela operation? Thoughts? They could’ve swapped Claude for Grok. Doesn’t matter. They could not have swapped Palantir’s software for something else, though. The LLMs that you point out Palantir does not have, are a commodity. - How about this other example of the 18th Airborne Corps' artillery brigade reducing its targeting process from 724 minutes to 20 minutes with Palantir’s Maven Smart System? Is the ontology hallucinating there? - How about the Navy’s ShipOS, built on Palantir, decreasing schedule planning from 160 hours to 10 minutes? - What about the director of NATO’s Task Force Maven citing how critical the ontology here? “To capitalize on Al applications, an ontology and lineage for data is needed. Al applications don't understand context or meaning; they understand structure. A data ontology provides the machine With a common language and framework for defining concepts, their attributes and their relationships (for example, classifying a 'jet' as an 'air platform' with specific 'weapon systems'). Without this shared structure, an Al model trained on one system's terminology wouldn't be able to integrate data from another. MSS establishes this common schema across NATO systems, unlocking the possibility of interoperable Al applications. This interoperability and trust are paramount in a warfighting context.”: Which is more credible? Your Stanford paper, or a director at NATO who actually uses the software? You wrote 10,000 words, so it’s impossible to dissect the whole thing. If one tries to do so, you will just say they didn’t read it. So let’s take a look at this ontology paragraph specifically. Do you have any proof of the ontology failing? Or just this “what if” from a Stanford paper? There’s infinite examples of it being transformational.. that’s for sure.

Jack Prescott

24,154 views • 6 months ago

I usually don’t go after people like Andrew Bustamante (Andrew Bustamante). My stance on guys like him is simple, let them talk. The more they talk, the more people see exactly how stupid they are. Eventually, they make themselves irrelevant. So normally I’d stay quiet. But this guy decided to go after my very good friend John Kiriakou, a few times. Let’s be clear, John doesn’t need defending. He already wiped the floor with Bustamante in their debate. It was so bad I figured Bustamante would disappear after that. But that’s the thing about grifters, they never go away. They’ll chase cameras and attention no matter how bad it is. John Kiriakou is a hero. He refused to torture people. He blew the whistle on the CIA for torturing people. And for that, he went to prison for telling the truth. That’s the American way - tell the truth, and you get punished. Same story with Julian Assange and others like him. Bustamante, on the other hand, is a company man. He doesn’t challenge anything, doesn’t risk anything. He plays the game safe, for money and visibility. Put a camera in the room, and he’ll be there. Guaranteed anything for airtime. Let me tell you something about Bustamante, he was a special operations officer, It sounds impressive, but in reality it means - he was an assistant to officers like John. He brought people like John coffee and dealt with their paperwork. He was a paperboy at the agency. He flunked out Ops training. :)) So Bustamante got destroyed in a debate with John and instead of responding with substance, he defaulted to calling John a Russian propagandist. That’s what people do when they have no arguments left. Calling someone a propagandist. His big point? That John worked for RT, so he must be a propagandist. There are plenty of Americans who’ve work with RT, including extremely respected voices. When you’ve been blacklisted by the system like John was after he came out of prison, your options get limited fast. The CIA made sure no-one would hire him. RT was the only one that gave him a platform. That’s not some gotcha Bustamante, that’s harsh reality veterans and hero whist-blowers face. Something you will never understand, you supports the system fully. John is America's favorite spy. That's what they call him now, I think. Then there’s his 'analysis' of my Erika Kirk post, which I enjoyed beyond words can express. I laughed a lot, so I guess I have to thank you for that. The guy who 'worked' for the CIA says, it’s subjective. Omg that's genius where did you get that from? What a perfectly trained young man, he just identified it so well. Oh wait, I literally opened with “This is my opinion” and closed with the same thing. Congratulations the CIA taught you how to read. :)) Then he, without ever watching a single episode of Candace Owens , called me a source of Candace O, which I am not, but will happily be anytime she needs me to. She's one of very few truth tellers left. But to answer your idiotic questions: she referred to my post because it went viral and because so many people felt the same way, including Candace. Then she went ahead and did what Candace does best: backed it up with facts. You seem a little slow, so I’ll repeat: she took a post that resonated with millions of people, including Candace herself, because of the overwhelming red flags Erika left us with and then Candace backed those feelings and assumptions up with facts. Not posts on X. A competent intelligence officer would’ve asked a real question: why did this post resonate to so many people? Why did millions of people connect with it? What exactly triggered that response on this posts? Instead Bustamante when with - It hurts :)) Oh I'm sure it hurts buddy! He says: “attractive enough for what?'' Bustamante asks “sell what?” Since the CIA didn’t do a great job training you boy, let me spell it out. Attractive enough for men to want to fuck her and women to want to be her and to believe every word she says because of that. I did not use the F-word in the post, she is a widow after all, but if you insist. Sell what? - sell that she’s a grieving widow. Did you even read the text?. Dear Bustamante, You’re a great example of why the CIA keeps getting caught for the shitty things it does. Imagine if much smarter people worked there, we’d all be in serious trouble. Have you been on the ground at UVU? Have you talked to the authorities or reviewed any tapes? have you watch Candaces series at all? Have you attended even a single court hearing or looked at any real evidence at all? The answer to all these things is - NO. Because if you had I would have seen you there. I didn't. And I have done all those things. Here’s my offer: come on my show, you clearly don’t mind the spotlight. I’ll walk through every red flag in this case, one by one. If you can’t give a clear, reasonable explanation for why these aren’t suspicious and why there’s no valid reason to suspect this was an assassination carried out by a state and not a weird kid from Utah, then you publicly apologize to Candace, to me, and to John. No excuses! Can't wait!
1:52

I usually don’t go after people like Andrew Bustamante (Andrew Bustamante). My stance on guys like him is simple, let them talk. The more they talk, the more people see exactly how stupid they are. Eventually, they make themselves irrelevant. So normally I’d stay quiet. But this guy decided to go after my very good friend John Kiriakou, a few times. Let’s be clear, John doesn’t need defending. He already wiped the floor with Bustamante in their debate. It was so bad I figured Bustamante would disappear after that. But that’s the thing about grifters, they never go away. They’ll chase cameras and attention no matter how bad it is. John Kiriakou is a hero. He refused to torture people. He blew the whistle on the CIA for torturing people. And for that, he went to prison for telling the truth. That’s the American way - tell the truth, and you get punished. Same story with Julian Assange and others like him. Bustamante, on the other hand, is a company man. He doesn’t challenge anything, doesn’t risk anything. He plays the game safe, for money and visibility. Put a camera in the room, and he’ll be there. Guaranteed anything for airtime. Let me tell you something about Bustamante, he was a special operations officer, It sounds impressive, but in reality it means - he was an assistant to officers like John. He brought people like John coffee and dealt with their paperwork. He was a paperboy at the agency. He flunked out Ops training. :)) So Bustamante got destroyed in a debate with John and instead of responding with substance, he defaulted to calling John a Russian propagandist. That’s what people do when they have no arguments left. Calling someone a propagandist. His big point? That John worked for RT, so he must be a propagandist. There are plenty of Americans who’ve work with RT, including extremely respected voices. When you’ve been blacklisted by the system like John was after he came out of prison, your options get limited fast. The CIA made sure no-one would hire him. RT was the only one that gave him a platform. That’s not some gotcha Bustamante, that’s harsh reality veterans and hero whist-blowers face. Something you will never understand, you supports the system fully. John is America's favorite spy. That's what they call him now, I think. Then there’s his 'analysis' of my Erika Kirk post, which I enjoyed beyond words can express. I laughed a lot, so I guess I have to thank you for that. The guy who 'worked' for the CIA says, it’s subjective. Omg that's genius where did you get that from? What a perfectly trained young man, he just identified it so well. Oh wait, I literally opened with “This is my opinion” and closed with the same thing. Congratulations the CIA taught you how to read. :)) Then he, without ever watching a single episode of Candace Owens , called me a source of Candace O, which I am not, but will happily be anytime she needs me to. She's one of very few truth tellers left. But to answer your idiotic questions: she referred to my post because it went viral and because so many people felt the same way, including Candace. Then she went ahead and did what Candace does best: backed it up with facts. You seem a little slow, so I’ll repeat: she took a post that resonated with millions of people, including Candace herself, because of the overwhelming red flags Erika left us with and then Candace backed those feelings and assumptions up with facts. Not posts on X. A competent intelligence officer would’ve asked a real question: why did this post resonate to so many people? Why did millions of people connect with it? What exactly triggered that response on this posts? Instead Bustamante when with - It hurts :)) Oh I'm sure it hurts buddy! He says: “attractive enough for what?'' Bustamante asks “sell what?” Since the CIA didn’t do a great job training you boy, let me spell it out. Attractive enough for men to want to fuck her and women to want to be her and to believe every word she says because of that. I did not use the F-word in the post, she is a widow after all, but if you insist. Sell what? - sell that she’s a grieving widow. Did you even read the text?. Dear Bustamante, You’re a great example of why the CIA keeps getting caught for the shitty things it does. Imagine if much smarter people worked there, we’d all be in serious trouble. Have you been on the ground at UVU? Have you talked to the authorities or reviewed any tapes? have you watch Candaces series at all? Have you attended even a single court hearing or looked at any real evidence at all? The answer to all these things is - NO. Because if you had I would have seen you there. I didn't. And I have done all those things. Here’s my offer: come on my show, you clearly don’t mind the spotlight. I’ll walk through every red flag in this case, one by one. If you can’t give a clear, reasonable explanation for why these aren’t suspicious and why there’s no valid reason to suspect this was an assassination carried out by a state and not a weird kid from Utah, then you publicly apologize to Candace, to me, and to John. No excuses! Can't wait!

ELIZABETH LANE

20,708 views • 4 months ago

Unstructured Thoughts about OpenAI o3, the nature of AGI, and Post-Labor Economics AGI just crossed a threshold—here’s why that matters and what we can do with it. I’ve been hammering on OpenAI’s new o3 model for a few days, long enough to watch the hype settle into something more interesting: utility. Benchmarks suggest a polite incremental bump; lived experience says we’ve entered a qualitatively different regime. o3 is the first model that feels faster than my ability to absorb its output. My brain—not the AI—has become the bottleneck. A new ceiling for human cognition? Most discussions of “alien intelligence” forget that we share the same sandbox: mathematics, physics, code, natural language. What shifts is cognitive horizon—the totality you can mentally represent and manipulate. o3 expands that horizon in real time. In an afternoon it consolidated two years of my work on post‑labor economics, stress‑tested the logic, surfaced data sources, and offered to autogenerate the Python notebooks. The cost of insight has collapsed from years to hours. If you merely outsource thought, you’ll stagnate. If you treat the model as a sparring partner—interrogating, refining, iterating—you’ll compound your own intelligence. Exponential leverage is now a choice, not a privilege. What o3 got right about my health project? I dumped the entire history of my chronic‑fatigue recovery protocol—including the five‑axis “burnout pentagram”—into memory and asked the model where I’d gone astray. It corrected a handful of minor assumptions and, more importantly, recalibrated my timeline: six‑to‑eight months of recovery left instead of eighteen. That’s not “replace your doctor” advice; it’s proof that large‑context reasoning is finally clinically useful. Post‑Labor Economics: the sketch that o3 and I built in one sitting 1. Metric 1 – Economic Agency Index (EAI) Income decomposed into wages, property, and transfers. The higher the property share, the more “post‑labor” you already are. 2. Metric 2 – Collective Purchasing Power (CPP) How much capital a county can mobilize without taxation or new debt. Rising CPP means you are compounding local prosperity. Interventions happen at the county level (subsidiarity): solar co‑ops in Arizona, riverfront greenways in the Midwest, data‑center dividends in fiber‑rich exurbs. Ownership is local, revenue is distributed, migration equilibrates naturally, and environmental stewardship becomes self‑interest rather than moral theater. UBI morphs from last‑ditch transfer to one of several levers for raising EAI. The bigger picture: AGI isn’t an oracle descending from the sky; it’s a time‑compression engine. Every minute you spend learning how to learn with it buys you an hour you would have burned doing rote synthesis. The frontier question is no longer “Will the machines replace us?” but “How fast can we upgrade ourselves in partnership with them?” What’s next? I’m cleaning the data, building the national EAI/CPP dashboard, and pressure‑testing the whole framework. I’ll publish the notebooks (or let o3 do it) once the numbers are solid. Meanwhile, I want to hear from you: Where does o3 add the most leverage in your world? Which of the post‑labor metrics feels wrong—or dangerously right? What failure mode should falsify this thesis? Drop your critique, your data source, or your wild counter‑proposal in the comments. Let’s map the edge of this new cognitive horizon together. —Dave
39:36

Unstructured Thoughts about OpenAI o3, the nature of AGI, and Post-Labor Economics AGI just crossed a threshold—here’s why that matters and what we can do with it. I’ve been hammering on OpenAI’s new o3 model for a few days, long enough to watch the hype settle into something more interesting: utility. Benchmarks suggest a polite incremental bump; lived experience says we’ve entered a qualitatively different regime. o3 is the first model that feels faster than my ability to absorb its output. My brain—not the AI—has become the bottleneck. A new ceiling for human cognition? Most discussions of “alien intelligence” forget that we share the same sandbox: mathematics, physics, code, natural language. What shifts is cognitive horizon—the totality you can mentally represent and manipulate. o3 expands that horizon in real time. In an afternoon it consolidated two years of my work on post‑labor economics, stress‑tested the logic, surfaced data sources, and offered to autogenerate the Python notebooks. The cost of insight has collapsed from years to hours. If you merely outsource thought, you’ll stagnate. If you treat the model as a sparring partner—interrogating, refining, iterating—you’ll compound your own intelligence. Exponential leverage is now a choice, not a privilege. What o3 got right about my health project? I dumped the entire history of my chronic‑fatigue recovery protocol—including the five‑axis “burnout pentagram”—into memory and asked the model where I’d gone astray. It corrected a handful of minor assumptions and, more importantly, recalibrated my timeline: six‑to‑eight months of recovery left instead of eighteen. That’s not “replace your doctor” advice; it’s proof that large‑context reasoning is finally clinically useful. Post‑Labor Economics: the sketch that o3 and I built in one sitting 1. Metric 1 – Economic Agency Index (EAI) Income decomposed into wages, property, and transfers. The higher the property share, the more “post‑labor” you already are. 2. Metric 2 – Collective Purchasing Power (CPP) How much capital a county can mobilize without taxation or new debt. Rising CPP means you are compounding local prosperity. Interventions happen at the county level (subsidiarity): solar co‑ops in Arizona, riverfront greenways in the Midwest, data‑center dividends in fiber‑rich exurbs. Ownership is local, revenue is distributed, migration equilibrates naturally, and environmental stewardship becomes self‑interest rather than moral theater. UBI morphs from last‑ditch transfer to one of several levers for raising EAI. The bigger picture: AGI isn’t an oracle descending from the sky; it’s a time‑compression engine. Every minute you spend learning how to learn with it buys you an hour you would have burned doing rote synthesis. The frontier question is no longer “Will the machines replace us?” but “How fast can we upgrade ourselves in partnership with them?” What’s next? I’m cleaning the data, building the national EAI/CPP dashboard, and pressure‑testing the whole framework. I’ll publish the notebooks (or let o3 do it) once the numbers are solid. Meanwhile, I want to hear from you: Where does o3 add the most leverage in your world? Which of the post‑labor metrics feels wrong—or dangerously right? What failure mode should falsify this thesis? Drop your critique, your data source, or your wild counter‑proposal in the comments. Let’s map the edge of this new cognitive horizon together. —Dave

David Shapiro (L/0)

45,581 views • 1 year ago