Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Qullamaggie's opening range highs / opening range break concept was dervied from fund manager Toby Crabel. Qullamaggie talked about him in a stream once - "I got opening range highs concept from this fund manager who made a billion dollars just trading opening range highs. Toby Crabel I think...

54,198 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

IMPROVE EXECUTION IN THE FIRST 5–15 MINUTES Many traders who rely heavily on opening range trading often struggle with where to focus in the initial minutes of the trading day and how to avoid missing trades during this period. Poor execution in this window can mean missing out on the entire trading day. In this video, we discuss how we address this using procedural memory and live simulations of the first 5 to 15 minutes of the trading day. We also cover how we improve stock selection for the focus list during this period through feedback loops. This is a common challenge in the fintwit community, where everyone is searching for a mechanical formula to shrink a watchlist of 25–30 stocks down to just 3–5, hoping to pick only the stocks that will move the next day. Unfortunately, such magic formulas exist only for three kinds of people: God, an astrologer, or a liar. For the rest of us, there are no A=B type rules that can consistently identify the next day’s best movers. And this desperation is exactly what allows many snake oil salesmen thrive. That said, the focus list can be improved significantly through consistent feedback loops, by comparing your watchlist with what the market actually delivered. Over time, your chart-reading ability improves, and you start recognizing the characteristics that lead to high-probability setups. This is where the craft of trading comes into play, not just the rigid, rule-based approach that many keep searching for.

TradeTM

18,990 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

He's right, I do have it in my notes because he did say it! 😆 On multiple instances, but here's him saying it on Trader Round Up: Timestamp 1:00:00 “They have to have the last two Mondays and the last two Fridays always, because they are the beginning and the end of the week.” ---- Timestamp 59:53 "In fact, every Monday, you should have two Mondays and two Fridays. In my opinion, if you’re going to ask me, like I teach my sons, they have to have the last two Mondays and the last two Fridays always because they’re at the beginning and the end of the week. So that’s what Cameron made money with today. He used information that is gleaned from that range, where we’re at in price action, and using the higher timeframe expectancy that we saw, that rejection when it went up to take that short term high." ---- Timestamp 1:00:46 "But every one of you listening, if you were my kid, if you were sitting with me, you would be hearing me tell you: Do you have two Mondays worth? Do you have both Fridays? Present today’s Friday and then last Friday’s Opening Range high, low and close, and the gradient levels on it? And then where are we in relation to that? Are we significantly above it, significantly below it, are we in close proximity to it? Because Monday’s Opening Range gap and Friday’s Opening Range gap are like a big huge draw on liquidity. It'll act like a big magnet. Not all the time, it’s not a panacea, but if we’ve traveled a lot one way, those Opening Ranges tend to be a factor on the close of the week and the beginning of the week. So Monday’s trading and Friday’s trading, using that framework that includes two weeks worth of Monday and Friday, have them in there. Even if you don’t want to carry Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, the week prior to last week at least have that previous Monday in there, because that way you’ll gonna have a full range of opportunity that the algorithm will refer back to."

Pipmunch

181,710 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

$BTC update 24 April 2026 These video updates are for educational purposes only and should never ever be considered as investment or trading advice. Always do your own research and planning. " $BTC and the crypto currency market have somewhat stabilised in recent weeks as these assets have based into the phase and for the very first time in several months $BTC flipped an SR which triggered long positions in coins such as $DOGE (which itself based in phase after an 85% washout). On the lower timeframes this market is making positive patterns for the very first time since late summer 2025 and that data cannot be ignored and there's potential for some relief in this sector, however there is a caveat to all of this and that is implied volatilities suggest there is potential for a hard sell setting up and that syncs with my higher tf outlook for the crypto market that any move higher is countertrend and there will likely be another wave down 66-68 k is now the SR below (but think about the sideways low and what that tells you about supply and demand and what can happen in the future). above that 70.8k is the local level of demand. As always, thanks to those who support the feed". This was last week's text update and as we can $BTC has followed along and now on the very ltf the patterns are bullish telling us that conditions have indeed changed and a move into the mid 80ks can set up after a period of consolidation. There is a warning in this analysis and that is yields and the VIX telling us that an important top is likely being set in the #spx and that what we are seeing in #crypto is likely a countertrend bear market rally. As always, thanks to those who support the feed. These videos take a lot of time to plan and create so I appreciate the support.

venture

71,873 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Big Pharma Is Profits Over People, Killing You For Profit & Vacations. Everyone In America Needs To See This ⛔️ “Cancer — Well, I will talk about that a better thing to talk about, however, is the relationship between profits and cancer in the United States. And there was a study that was published, I believe it was in 1994. It was a 12-year program, 12-year study. They looked at adults who had developed cancer as an adult, not childhood cancer, but adult cancer, right? And this is the main types of cancer that we get here in the United States. They did a meta-analysis of these people all around the world who developed cancer as adults for 12 years and were treated with chemo. And they looked at the results. And they published the results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. And the results? 97%. Of the time, chemotherapy does not work. 97% of the time, it doesn't work. So why is it still used? It's one reason and one reason only, money. If you go to a medical doctor, an MD, with a sinus infection, and that doctor prescribes an antibiotic, he gets no financial kickback. Now, if he prescribes 5,000, you know of that antibiotic in one month, the drug company that makes it might send him to Cancun for a conference, right? But he gets no direct remuneration. It's not with chemotherapeutic drugs. It's different. Chemotherapeutic drugs are the only classification of drugs that the prescribing doctor gets a direct cut of. So if your doctor prescribes chemotherapy for you, here's how it goes more or less. The doctor buys it from the pharmaceutical company for $5,000, sells it to the patient for $12,000, insurance pays $9,000, and the doctor pockets the $4,000 difference. And there ought to be a lot. The only reason chemotherapy is used is because doctors make money from it. Period. It doesn't work. 97% of the time. If Ford Motor Company made an automobile that exploded 97% of the time, would they still be in business? No. This is the tip of the iceberg of the control that the pharmaceutical industry has on us.”

Wall Street Apes

339,827 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren