Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Putin said that Russia would deploy intermediate and shorter range missiles and blamed the West for that: Russia is capable of responding to any existing or newly emerging threats, not with words, but through military-technical measures. An example of this is our decision to abandon the unilateral moratorium on...

Gerashchenko_en's profile picture

Anton Gerashchenko

685,054 subscribers

119,697 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Statement by the President of the Russian Federation ⚡️🇷🇺PUTIN CONFIRMS NUKE-CAPABLE BALLISTIC MISSILE STRIKE ON UKRAINE, stating it was test of state-of-the-art Oreshnik (“Hazel”) medium-range ballistic missiles, armed with non-nuclear warheads on huge Dnepropetrovsk weapons factory in #Ukraine. Russian leader states test launch is response to U.S. and UK long-range missiles targeting pre-war Russia, adding that #Washington’s warmongering expansion direct reason for Moscow’s retaliatory measure: We are developing medium- and shorter-range missiles as a response to U.S. plans to produce and deploy medium- and shorter-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. The United States made a mistake by unilaterally destroying the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty in 2019 under a far-fetched pretext. Let me remind you that Russia voluntarily, unilaterally committed itself not to deploy medium- and shorter-range missiles until American weapons of this kind appear in any region of the world. Let me repeat that we are conducting combat tests of the Oreshnik missile system in response to the aggressive actions of #NATO countries against #Russia Oreshnik missiles have top speed of Mach 10 - that’s whopping 3 km per SECOND - with Russian Prez adding that civilians will be given advance warning before Russian forces use ballistic missiles.
7:45

Statement by the President of the Russian Federation ⚡️🇷🇺PUTIN CONFIRMS NUKE-CAPABLE BALLISTIC MISSILE STRIKE ON UKRAINE, stating it was test of state-of-the-art Oreshnik (“Hazel”) medium-range ballistic missiles, armed with non-nuclear warheads on huge Dnepropetrovsk weapons factory in #Ukraine. Russian leader states test launch is response to U.S. and UK long-range missiles targeting pre-war Russia, adding that #Washington’s warmongering expansion direct reason for Moscow’s retaliatory measure: We are developing medium- and shorter-range missiles as a response to U.S. plans to produce and deploy medium- and shorter-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. The United States made a mistake by unilaterally destroying the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty in 2019 under a far-fetched pretext. Let me remind you that Russia voluntarily, unilaterally committed itself not to deploy medium- and shorter-range missiles until American weapons of this kind appear in any region of the world. Let me repeat that we are conducting combat tests of the Oreshnik missile system in response to the aggressive actions of #NATO countries against #Russia Oreshnik missiles have top speed of Mach 10 - that’s whopping 3 km per SECOND - with Russian Prez adding that civilians will be given advance warning before Russian forces use ballistic missiles.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

87,473 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🇷🇺 Strategic Asymmetry: Russia’s Countermove on INF Missiles by Elena Panina Russia has officially announced that it is abandoning the self-imposed restrictions under the moratorium on the deployment of intermediate and shorter-range missiles (INF), citing the actions of the United States, which has long stationed similar missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific Region (APR), thereby disrupting the status quo. Notably, this is the first time Russia has explicitly stated that the threat from U.S. INF missiles comes not only from Europe but also from the APR. ▪️ On the surface, Moscow’s lifting of the INF moratorium appears to be nothing more than a symmetrical response to Washington’s escalation. But on a deeper level, it is a move to seize the initiative disguised as a reactive measure. Russia is not just “responding”—it is crafting a new strategic framework in the absence of international constraints. And it now has, among other assets, the serial production of the Oreshnik missile system. Why the emphasis on the APR in the Russian Foreign Ministry’s statement, given that Russia lacks an extensive network of military bases there? This is where things get interesting. Russia currently cannot project power in the APR the way the U.S. does by deploying missiles in Guam, the Philippines, and Australia. But Russia has the Far East—from where it can reach Guam, Alaska, the U.S. Pacific coast, not to mention South Korea and Japan. Moreover, Russia now has a direct military ally in the region—North Korea—and the recent visits of high-ranking Russian military officials to Pyongyang were clearly not coincidental. Russia can operate through North Korea with relative freedom, including under the “sovereign proxy” model, much like the U.S. does with Israel in the Middle East. And let’s not forget the Chinese factor. ▪️ Thus, this marks a strategic paradigm shift. If Moscow previously relied on treaties and “playing by the rules,” it is now betting on unpredictability, interconnected fronts, and a balance of threats. For Europe, this creates at least two key flashpoints—Kaliningrad and Crimea. For U.S. allies in the Far East, there’s North Korea. And the U.S. itself now has to juggle between two fronts—or even three, if we include the Middle East. The Pentagon’s need to respond has multiplied, along with the growing complexity of strategic planning: the U.S. will now have to deploy missile defense systems worldwide—all while facing shortages of missiles and defense systems. This is the power of asymmetric strategy: you don’t need to be stronger, you just need to be less predictable and threaten from unexpected directions.
2:39

🇷🇺 Strategic Asymmetry: Russia’s Countermove on INF Missiles by Elena Panina Russia has officially announced that it is abandoning the self-imposed restrictions under the moratorium on the deployment of intermediate and shorter-range missiles (INF), citing the actions of the United States, which has long stationed similar missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific Region (APR), thereby disrupting the status quo. Notably, this is the first time Russia has explicitly stated that the threat from U.S. INF missiles comes not only from Europe but also from the APR. ▪️ On the surface, Moscow’s lifting of the INF moratorium appears to be nothing more than a symmetrical response to Washington’s escalation. But on a deeper level, it is a move to seize the initiative disguised as a reactive measure. Russia is not just “responding”—it is crafting a new strategic framework in the absence of international constraints. And it now has, among other assets, the serial production of the Oreshnik missile system. Why the emphasis on the APR in the Russian Foreign Ministry’s statement, given that Russia lacks an extensive network of military bases there? This is where things get interesting. Russia currently cannot project power in the APR the way the U.S. does by deploying missiles in Guam, the Philippines, and Australia. But Russia has the Far East—from where it can reach Guam, Alaska, the U.S. Pacific coast, not to mention South Korea and Japan. Moreover, Russia now has a direct military ally in the region—North Korea—and the recent visits of high-ranking Russian military officials to Pyongyang were clearly not coincidental. Russia can operate through North Korea with relative freedom, including under the “sovereign proxy” model, much like the U.S. does with Israel in the Middle East. And let’s not forget the Chinese factor. ▪️ Thus, this marks a strategic paradigm shift. If Moscow previously relied on treaties and “playing by the rules,” it is now betting on unpredictability, interconnected fronts, and a balance of threats. For Europe, this creates at least two key flashpoints—Kaliningrad and Crimea. For U.S. allies in the Far East, there’s North Korea. And the U.S. itself now has to juggle between two fronts—or even three, if we include the Middle East. The Pentagon’s need to respond has multiplied, along with the growing complexity of strategic planning: the U.S. will now have to deploy missile defense systems worldwide—all while facing shortages of missiles and defense systems. This is the power of asymmetric strategy: you don’t need to be stronger, you just need to be less predictable and threaten from unexpected directions.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

16,164 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Lavrov said that in 2021, the United States refused to allow Russia to declare Ukraine's neutrality and declared its intention to deploy medium- and shorter-range land-based missiles on its territory. According to him, such statements were made by US Secretary of State Blinken during the negotiations that took place on the eve of the full-scale war in Ukraine. "We were essentially ignored. And the tasks that were put forward, which we are now solving within the framework of a special military operation, were called unacceptable. No guarantees that Ukraine will not join NATO. Forget about it. The maximum, Secretary of State Blinken told me then, is that we are creating ground-based medium- and shorter-range missiles - a class that was prohibited by the INF Treaty, from which the United States withdrew - let's agree that in Ukraine we will deploy such ground-based medium- and shorter-range missiles in a certain quantity, no more. Well, and you will also take on the same obligation near the Ukrainian border on how to ensure this," Lavrov said. It should be noted that the United States did not confirm that they had declared to the Russians their intentions to deploy missiles in Ukraine.
0:53

Lavrov said that in 2021, the United States refused to allow Russia to declare Ukraine's neutrality and declared its intention to deploy medium- and shorter-range land-based missiles on its territory. According to him, such statements were made by US Secretary of State Blinken during the negotiations that took place on the eve of the full-scale war in Ukraine. "We were essentially ignored. And the tasks that were put forward, which we are now solving within the framework of a special military operation, were called unacceptable. No guarantees that Ukraine will not join NATO. Forget about it. The maximum, Secretary of State Blinken told me then, is that we are creating ground-based medium- and shorter-range missiles - a class that was prohibited by the INF Treaty, from which the United States withdrew - let's agree that in Ukraine we will deploy such ground-based medium- and shorter-range missiles in a certain quantity, no more. Well, and you will also take on the same obligation near the Ukrainian border on how to ensure this," Lavrov said. It should be noted that the United States did not confirm that they had declared to the Russians their intentions to deploy missiles in Ukraine.

Victor vicktop55 commentary

18,489 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Putin, meeting with his Security Council, says Russia will answer threats ‘not with words but with force.’ He warns of crumbling strategic stability, calls the end of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty moratorium a ‘forced step’.... yet insists Moscow’s move could still open a door to dialogue with Washington. A threat and an olive branch, in the same breath.
0:53

Putin, meeting with his Security Council, says Russia will answer threats ‘not with words but with force.’ He warns of crumbling strategic stability, calls the end of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty moratorium a ‘forced step’.... yet insists Moscow’s move could still open a door to dialogue with Washington. A threat and an olive branch, in the same breath.

Brian McDonald

38,046 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Macron says Europe must develop its own intermediate-range ballistic missiles (IRBMs) like Russia’s Oreshnik or comparable long-range strike weapons. Macron says Russia’s recent Oreshnik strike on Lviv is a "clear signal" and a demonstration that Europe is within range. He stressed the need to accelerate efforts under the existing European Long-Range Strike Approach (ELSA) initiative, which was launched in 2024 by France, Germany, Poland, and later joined the UK, Italy, Sweden and the Netherlands. Macron argues that developing these capabilities collectively will enhance Europe's credibility, strengthen nuclear deterrence and respond to the shifting balance from Russia's recent deployment of both nuclear weapons and Oreshniks in Belarus. Macron argues that while it’s necessary to pool resources for European long-range systems rivalling the Oreshnik, France is capable to providing key technologies for the project through the know-how it has acquired by fielding S2/S3 IRBMs until 1996 and developing its own submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) since the 1960s. The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, bilateral U.S.-Soviet agreement that banned all ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges of 500–5,500 km in Europe, was in place between 1987 and 2019. European NATO members (and the U.S. for its European deployments) adhered to this, avoiding new IRBM development or deployment. The treaty collapsed when the U.S. withdrew in 2019 in response to Russia not adhering to the treaty by developing IRBMs and cruise missiles with 1000 km such as 9M729. Macron has now made it clear that Europe’s mission to speed up its own IRBM and long-range cruise missiles must be sped up significantly. It remains to be seen whether Europe will heed his advice
0:55

Macron says Europe must develop its own intermediate-range ballistic missiles (IRBMs) like Russia’s Oreshnik or comparable long-range strike weapons. Macron says Russia’s recent Oreshnik strike on Lviv is a "clear signal" and a demonstration that Europe is within range. He stressed the need to accelerate efforts under the existing European Long-Range Strike Approach (ELSA) initiative, which was launched in 2024 by France, Germany, Poland, and later joined the UK, Italy, Sweden and the Netherlands. Macron argues that developing these capabilities collectively will enhance Europe's credibility, strengthen nuclear deterrence and respond to the shifting balance from Russia's recent deployment of both nuclear weapons and Oreshniks in Belarus. Macron argues that while it’s necessary to pool resources for European long-range systems rivalling the Oreshnik, France is capable to providing key technologies for the project through the know-how it has acquired by fielding S2/S3 IRBMs until 1996 and developing its own submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) since the 1960s. The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, bilateral U.S.-Soviet agreement that banned all ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges of 500–5,500 km in Europe, was in place between 1987 and 2019. European NATO members (and the U.S. for its European deployments) adhered to this, avoiding new IRBM development or deployment. The treaty collapsed when the U.S. withdrew in 2019 in response to Russia not adhering to the treaty by developing IRBMs and cruise missiles with 1000 km such as 9M729. Macron has now made it clear that Europe’s mission to speed up its own IRBM and long-range cruise missiles must be sped up significantly. It remains to be seen whether Europe will heed his advice

Visegrád 24

183,850 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Putin issued fresh war threats and criticized Trump's "Golden Dome" project In his statement, the Kremlin leader declared that Russia would respond "to any potential threats with military force." He accused the West of taking "destructive steps" that "undermined the foundations for dialogue between nuclear-armed states." Putin also spoke out against Trump's "Golden Dome" initiative, saying that the deployment of "U.S. weapons in space" would "undermine Russia's efforts to preserve strategic stability." He added that, if necessary, he is ready "to respond." The "Golden Dome" program, first announced by Trump in January, aims to build a satellite network capable of detecting, tracking, and potentially intercepting missiles.
0:20

Putin issued fresh war threats and criticized Trump's "Golden Dome" project In his statement, the Kremlin leader declared that Russia would respond "to any potential threats with military force." He accused the West of taking "destructive steps" that "undermined the foundations for dialogue between nuclear-armed states." Putin also spoke out against Trump's "Golden Dome" initiative, saying that the deployment of "U.S. weapons in space" would "undermine Russia's efforts to preserve strategic stability." He added that, if necessary, he is ready "to respond." The "Golden Dome" program, first announced by Trump in January, aims to build a satellite network capable of detecting, tracking, and potentially intercepting missiles.

Visegrád 24

305,796 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨BREAKING: RUSSIA TO DEPLOY NUCLEAR POWERED MISSLE | Threatens West With ‘Response’ Putin says Russia will deploy a nuclear powered missile ‘soon’. This comes after a successful test of a nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable cruise missile with a potential range of many thousands of miles. Putin also declined to rule out the possibility it could carry out weapons tests involving nuclear explosions for the first time in more than three decades. Today, Putin warned the West of a ‘response’ to the pressure, and his willingness to ‘end the war’: "There is permanently increasing military and political pressure [from the West]. We have to respond. I have said many times that it was not us who started the war in Ukraine. On the contrary, we are trying to end it." “The West has lost the sense of reality. Ukrainian conflict is not about territories. The issue is about global order.” Zelensky warned Europe that if Ukraine loses, Russia will attack other counties as well. Is Russia posturing again, as we’ve seen in the past, or is this not a bluff?
0:57

🚨BREAKING: RUSSIA TO DEPLOY NUCLEAR POWERED MISSLE | Threatens West With ‘Response’ Putin says Russia will deploy a nuclear powered missile ‘soon’. This comes after a successful test of a nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable cruise missile with a potential range of many thousands of miles. Putin also declined to rule out the possibility it could carry out weapons tests involving nuclear explosions for the first time in more than three decades. Today, Putin warned the West of a ‘response’ to the pressure, and his willingness to ‘end the war’: "There is permanently increasing military and political pressure [from the West]. We have to respond. I have said many times that it was not us who started the war in Ukraine. On the contrary, we are trying to end it." “The West has lost the sense of reality. Ukrainian conflict is not about territories. The issue is about global order.” Zelensky warned Europe that if Ukraine loses, Russia will attack other counties as well. Is Russia posturing again, as we’ve seen in the past, or is this not a bluff?

Mario Nawfal

10,995,381 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🚨🇷🇺RUSSIA: HYPERSONIC MISSILE STRIKE WAS A WARNING TO THE WEST Yesterday’s strike on a weapons factory in Dnipro, Ukraine, marked the first use of a new hypersonic intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM). According to Putin, it can travel at speeds up to Mach 10, and there is no way of intercepting it. The missiles are capable of striking anywhere in Europe within 20 minutes and can carry conventional or nuclear warheads. Source: RT
0:35

Sensitive content

🚨🇷🇺RUSSIA: HYPERSONIC MISSILE STRIKE WAS A WARNING TO THE WEST Yesterday’s strike on a weapons factory in Dnipro, Ukraine, marked the first use of a new hypersonic intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM). According to Putin, it can travel at speeds up to Mach 10, and there is no way of intercepting it. The missiles are capable of striking anywhere in Europe within 20 minutes and can carry conventional or nuclear warheads. Source: RT

Mario Nawfal

985,454 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

☝️The use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons to strike Russian territory would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. “We are not talking about authorizing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory—this is already being done with the help of unmanned aircraft and other means. However, when we are talking about the use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons, that is a completely different story. The fact is, and any expert from our country or the West will confirm this, the Ukrainian army is not able to operate such weapons on its own. Their effective use is only possible with targeting intelligence from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. This is data that can only come from US or EU satellites—in other words, from NATO satellites. That is the first point. The second, and perhaps the key point, is that only NATO military personnel can program the flight missions for these missile systems; Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore, this is not about allowing the Kiev regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries are becoming directly involved in a military conflict or not. If such a decision is made, it would mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the US, and the EU in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, then, bearing this in mind, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats that would be posed to us” - President Putin
2:31

☝️The use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons to strike Russian territory would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. “We are not talking about authorizing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory—this is already being done with the help of unmanned aircraft and other means. However, when we are talking about the use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons, that is a completely different story. The fact is, and any expert from our country or the West will confirm this, the Ukrainian army is not able to operate such weapons on its own. Their effective use is only possible with targeting intelligence from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. This is data that can only come from US or EU satellites—in other words, from NATO satellites. That is the first point. The second, and perhaps the key point, is that only NATO military personnel can program the flight missions for these missile systems; Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore, this is not about allowing the Kiev regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries are becoming directly involved in a military conflict or not. If such a decision is made, it would mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the US, and the EU in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, then, bearing this in mind, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats that would be posed to us” - President Putin

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

291,721 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨🇷🇺 PUTIN: ORESHNIK MISSILES ARE THE ANSWER TO WESTERN THREATS “The Oreshnik Intermediate-Range Strike Complex has been a well-noted innovation. We have used it as a response to the Western long-range weapons being deployed in Ukraine. It was used in a non-nuclear form, and we must ensure mass production of these complexes to protect ourselves and our allies.” Source: RT
0:28

🚨🇷🇺 PUTIN: ORESHNIK MISSILES ARE THE ANSWER TO WESTERN THREATS “The Oreshnik Intermediate-Range Strike Complex has been a well-noted innovation. We have used it as a response to the Western long-range weapons being deployed in Ukraine. It was used in a non-nuclear form, and we must ensure mass production of these complexes to protect ourselves and our allies.” Source: RT

Mario Nawfal

87,975 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🇫🇷 Macron Calls for a "Tamed Russia" and Signals Readiness for War French President Emmanuel Macron declared that peace in Europe is only possible with a weakened Russia, calling the country a direct threat to France and the continent. He rejected a ceasefire in Ukraine, insisting that peace cannot come under Russian terms or through Ukraine’s surrender. He also did not rule out sending European troops to Ukraine. Macron raised the issue of France’s nuclear deterrence, emphasizing its role in European security and responding to German calls for extended protection. He stated that any decision on nuclear use would remain with the French president and military command. Other key points: - Europe must prepare for reduced U.S. support. - Europe’s future should not be dictated by Moscow or Washington. - France has the most capable military in Europe. Is Macron leading Europe toward direct conflict with Russia?
13:59

🇫🇷 Macron Calls for a "Tamed Russia" and Signals Readiness for War French President Emmanuel Macron declared that peace in Europe is only possible with a weakened Russia, calling the country a direct threat to France and the continent. He rejected a ceasefire in Ukraine, insisting that peace cannot come under Russian terms or through Ukraine’s surrender. He also did not rule out sending European troops to Ukraine. Macron raised the issue of France’s nuclear deterrence, emphasizing its role in European security and responding to German calls for extended protection. He stated that any decision on nuclear use would remain with the French president and military command. Other key points: - Europe must prepare for reduced U.S. support. - Europe’s future should not be dictated by Moscow or Washington. - France has the most capable military in Europe. Is Macron leading Europe toward direct conflict with Russia?

DD Geopolitics

353,960 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Russia announces continuation of military confrontation with the West at the UN Acting Permanent Representative of Russia to the UN Ana Yevstigneyeva spoke at an emergency meeting of the Security Council dedicated to the attack by Ukrainian armed forces on a bus carrying Belarusian citizens. ▪️According to her, Western countries supplying Kyiv with weapons bear "political and moral responsibility" for the consequences of the strike, which Moscow considers directed against civilians. Yevstigneyeva stated that Russia views these events as part of the West's strategy to "deal a strategic defeat" to the country and hinder its development. ▪️She emphasized that Moscow will continue to oppose these actions, including military measures. The diplomat also noted that Russia does not accept ultimatums and acts based on its own security interests and that the goals of the special military operation remain unchanged. It was also reported that a political and diplomatic solution is preferable, but according to the Russian side, such solutions are currently "not in sight".
2:41

Russia announces continuation of military confrontation with the West at the UN Acting Permanent Representative of Russia to the UN Ana Yevstigneyeva spoke at an emergency meeting of the Security Council dedicated to the attack by Ukrainian armed forces on a bus carrying Belarusian citizens. ▪️According to her, Western countries supplying Kyiv with weapons bear "political and moral responsibility" for the consequences of the strike, which Moscow considers directed against civilians. Yevstigneyeva stated that Russia views these events as part of the West's strategy to "deal a strategic defeat" to the country and hinder its development. ▪️She emphasized that Moscow will continue to oppose these actions, including military measures. The diplomat also noted that Russia does not accept ultimatums and acts based on its own security interests and that the goals of the special military operation remain unchanged. It was also reported that a political and diplomatic solution is preferable, but according to the Russian side, such solutions are currently "not in sight".

S p r i n t e r

13,321 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

BREAKING 🚨 🇮🇹 🇮🇷 Giorgia Meloni warns that the Ayatollah regime must not obtain nuclear weapons along with missiles capable of striking Italy and Europe. Such a capability would pose a direct threat to Europe.
0:21

BREAKING 🚨 🇮🇹 🇮🇷 Giorgia Meloni warns that the Ayatollah regime must not obtain nuclear weapons along with missiles capable of striking Italy and Europe. Such a capability would pose a direct threat to Europe.

FalconUpdatesHQ

67,922 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Zelensky: The deployment of Oreshnik in Belarus is being completed. We understand its location and have shared this information with our partners. We previously warned that Russia would deploy Oreshnik in Belarus and showed its operational range. This poses a threat to many European countries, including Poland and Germany.
0:47

Zelensky: The deployment of Oreshnik in Belarus is being completed. We understand its location and have shared this information with our partners. We previously warned that Russia would deploy Oreshnik in Belarus and showed its operational range. This poses a threat to many European countries, including Poland and Germany.

Clash Report

42,978 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Lavrov: Russia is not going to war with Europe. There are no such thoughts. But we will respond to any hostile actions, such as the deployment of troops on the territory of Ukraine [Constant threats to Europe and russian drones in EU airspace are denying this statement] 1/
0:30

Lavrov: Russia is not going to war with Europe. There are no such thoughts. But we will respond to any hostile actions, such as the deployment of troops on the territory of Ukraine [Constant threats to Europe and russian drones in EU airspace are denying this statement] 1/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

24,695 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🇺🇦🇷🇺🇺🇸🇪🇺🇬🇧‼️🚨 WW3 AROUND THE CORNER! The Russian president says that if Ukraine will be empowered to strike deep into Russia with western weapons, it means direct participation of NATO and Russia will react appropriately! Because to deep strike with cruise missiles you need: - Western satellite intelligence data - NATO personell needs to program the flight route and target of missiles within Russia Hence for Russia to destroy this threat they would need likely to strike NATO bases.
3:02

🇺🇦🇷🇺🇺🇸🇪🇺🇬🇧‼️🚨 WW3 AROUND THE CORNER! The Russian president says that if Ukraine will be empowered to strike deep into Russia with western weapons, it means direct participation of NATO and Russia will react appropriately! Because to deep strike with cruise missiles you need: - Western satellite intelligence data - NATO personell needs to program the flight route and target of missiles within Russia Hence for Russia to destroy this threat they would need likely to strike NATO bases.

Lord Bebo

357,641 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨The Washington Post reports that US officials say Russia🇷🇺 is helping Iran target US forces Any surprise if true? When the US provided Ukraine missiles and selected the targets for Zelensky to strike inside Russia, Vladimir Putin warned that two could play at the proxy war game and that Russia could supply long-range missiles to the US’ adversaries in response. Russia does not want to recklessly cause a World War, so isn’t supplying Iran with long-range missiles (yet), but is reportedly making the US pay a reciprocal price for the Ukraine proxy war by providing Iran targeting intelligence for its own long-range missiles.
0:57

🚨The Washington Post reports that US officials say Russia🇷🇺 is helping Iran target US forces Any surprise if true? When the US provided Ukraine missiles and selected the targets for Zelensky to strike inside Russia, Vladimir Putin warned that two could play at the proxy war game and that Russia could supply long-range missiles to the US’ adversaries in response. Russia does not want to recklessly cause a World War, so isn’t supplying Iran with long-range missiles (yet), but is reportedly making the US pay a reciprocal price for the Ukraine proxy war by providing Iran targeting intelligence for its own long-range missiles.

Going Underground

86,943 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce