Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Rahul Gandhi’s “Smash Patriarchy” campaign raises a simple question: does his crusade apply to every religion, or only to Hinduism? The Allahabad High Court recently held that there was no material to establish hijab as an essential religious practice of Islam and upheld the school’s uniform requirement. Will Rahul...

19,547 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

when a baniya #NRi #chaddi , suresh gupta tried to psyche rahul gandhi..... watch what happened......All #chaddis are the same. Gupta's schooling (any chance related to sekhargupta ? 🤪 when a nri sanghi tried schooling Rahul gandhi...... Rahul Gandhi’s interaction with Suresh kumar Gupta took place during his early March 2023 UK visit, at an Indian Journalists’ Association (IJA) event in London, in the context of his controversial Cambridge lecture. Background; On 28 February 2023, Rahul Gandhi (then a Visiting/Honorary Fellow-linked figure at Cambridge Judge Business School) delivered a lecture titled “Learning to Listen in the 21st Century.” In it, he alleged that Indian democracy was under attack, institutions (Parliament, judiciary, press) were being constrained, minorities were targeted, and that Pegasus spyware had been on his phone (and those of other politicians). He also spoke about production shifting to China and the need for democratic systems. The lecture drew sharp criticism in India from the BJP & others as an “anti-India tirade” from foreign soil. The interaction with Suresh Gupta At the subsequent IJA “India Insights” interaction in London (around 4–5 March 2023), veteran London-based journalist Suresh Gupta intervened during the Q&A. He introduced himself as settled in London since 1961, working for the New World newspaper, & claimed long personal connections to the Nehru-Gandhi family: He said he knew Indira Gandhi (describing her as like an elder sister) from his time at All India Radio (1958–61) & had met Jawaharlal Nehru (going to Teen Murti House for signatures via organisations like Bharat Lok Samaj). Gupta advised Rahul against criticising India abroad. He recalled that after Indira Gandhi’s imprisonment by the Morarji Desai government, at a London press conference a journalist asked about her prison experience and she replied that she did not want to say anything bad about India there. Gupta told Rahul: He was being constantly attacked in the Indian media for the Cambridge lecture. As a well-wisher who hoped to see Rahul become Prime Minister, he should take a lesson from Indira Gandhi’s example. He also asked whether, in nine years of BJP rule, Modi had done anything good for India. Rahul Gandhi’s response Rahul asked Gupta whether he had actually watched the Cambridge lecture. Gupta admitted he had only “heard about it,” not seen it. Rahul replied that it was “interesting” Gupta had formed an opinion without viewing it, and emphasised the need for an informed view. The moderator/IJA president Danish Khan supported Rahul, interjecting positively. Videos of the full IJA interaction (including this exchange) are available on Rahul Gandhi’s official YouTube channel and other platforms. Coverage framed it variously as Gupta “schooling” or advising Rahul on patriotism (drawing from Indira’s example), or as Rahul effectively shutting down an uninformed critique.The episode remains a frequently referenced moment from that UK trip, often linked in titles and discussion to the Cambridge lecture even though the direct exchange occurred at the London journalists’ event.

Alex James Murikan

90,418 views • 15 days ago

It's Good To Be Anti-Islam... but not anti-Muslim. 'Islam is an ideology—a set of ideas. It is not defined by what any individual Muslim wants it to be, but by what it inherently is. No ideology is above critique—particularly one that explicitly seeks political and social dominance over every person on the planet. Additionally, ideologies are not entitled to human rights; these rights apply to individuals. As an ideology, Islam is not necessarily entitled to equal respect and acceptance. Ideas do not carry equal moral weight. The feelings or the number of those who believe do not make an idea true or good. Bad ideas should be challenged before they lead to bad consequences. Islam is not simply a belief about God. The word 'Islam' means submission. It is a set of rules that define a social hierarchy where Muslims submit to Allah, women submit to men, and all non-Muslims submit to Islamic rule. Since we do not live in a Muslim country—where censorship, intimidation, and brute force are used to protect Islam from intellectual analysis—we are still somewhat free to openly exercise our right to debate the merits of the Islamic value system against Western Liberalism. Consider the following questions: Are men really superior to women as the Quran says? Are women intellectually inferior as Muhammad taught? Does propagating material that curses people of other religions amidst random calls to violence create a better social environment? Is it right to keep women as sex slaves merely because the Quran permits this practice in numerous places? Should atheists and homosexuals have to choose between the noose or an outward profession of faith in Allah? Is conformity superior to freedom? Yes, there are Muslims who take issue with these aspects of Islamic theology, but that doesn't change what Islam is. Do not confuse the ideology with the individual. Do not draw conclusions about Islam based on the Muslims that you know, whether they are terrorists or humanitarians. Islam must be understood based on what it is, as presented objectively in the Quran, Hadith, and Sira (biography of Muhammad)." Thank you to the amazing Pat Condell, who released this video ten years ago. #Respect

Amy Mek

108,430 views • 2 years ago

FLASHBACK (10/17/2023): Allie Beth Stuckey answered the question, “What is the difference between submitting to your husband and the Patriarchy?” In this clip, she demonstrates why Paul said, “I suffer not a woman to teach.” First of all, let’s think about the question itself. Why was it asked in the first place? I submit to you that it’s because Allie’s audience knows that she is anti-Patriarchy. This has been seen in how she counter-signals patriarchal Christians in the CN movement. The questioner knows this, which is why the question was framed this way. Second, notice how when talking about submission, Allie immediately launches into what it does NOT mean. Wives should submit, but here are all the times when they don’t have to. Submission is never talked about positively, and a positive definition is never provided. My captions demonstrate this. It’s very problematic to make submission conditional, since a reviling wife can easily make up definitions of abuse and sin that get her off the hook regarding submission. Likewise, she will insist that the Patriarchy is not bad. Stuckey says this multiple times and in multiple ways. However, she will never call it good either. Allie knows that she can’t outright decry the Patriarchy because it’s in the Bible, so she gives it lip service instead. Never is there a positive definition, just like with submission. Finally, Allie gets to what’s required of men, even though that’s unrelated to the original question. With gusto, she explains positively and unconditionally what husbands must do for their wives. There are no exceptions. Christ-like love is required, regardless of the wife’s behavior. So the question is, why is a husband’s love unconditional while a wife’s submission is conditional? Some food for thought…

Defiant Baptist

16,898 views • 5 months ago