正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Ran FlappyBench on Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, and Gemini 3.8 Flash with the same design prompt. 🔹 Qwen 3.8 Omni Flash: 9/10 · $0.013 · smooth gameplay and cheaper 🔹 DS V4.1 Flash: 9/10 · $0.0089 one-shot with the lowest cost 🔹 Gemini 3.8 Flash: 5/10 · $0.205 · 4-5 iterations...

CommandCodeAI's profile picture

Command Code

23,983 subscribers

23,480 次观看 • 2 天前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

free access to 8+ top AI models 😳 APInex is offering free models with 1M context - Gemini 3.8 Flash - Muse Spark 1.3 - GLM 5.3 Flash - Gemini 3.1 Pro - DeepSeek V4 Pro - GPT-5.6 Luna - Qwen 3.8 MAX - DeepSeek V4 Flash getting started: 1. go to 2. sign up with Gmail 3. create your API key 4. base url 5. choose a free model and start using free models, one API setup 👀
0:11

free access to 8+ top AI models 😳 APInex is offering free models with 1M context - Gemini 3.8 Flash - Muse Spark 1.3 - GLM 5.3 Flash - Gemini 3.1 Pro - DeepSeek V4 Pro - GPT-5.6 Luna - Qwen 3.8 MAX - DeepSeek V4 Flash getting started: 1. go to 2. sign up with Gmail 3. create your API key 4. base url 5. choose a free model and start using free models, one API setup 👀

K2S

27,390 次观看 • 16 天前

🚨Breaking: Ox Alpha is GLM 5.3 Flash by Z.ai! It's already available in Kilo, so we put it to the test. We gave the same prompt to both GLM 5.3 Flash and Gemini 3.7 Flash: Build a spectral audio visualizer. Costs: GLM 5.3 Flash: $0.01 Gemini 3.7 Flash: $0.17 17x cheaper for GLM 5.3 Flash. Who won on one-shot results?
0:17

🚨Breaking: Ox Alpha is GLM 5.3 Flash by Z.ai! It's already available in Kilo, so we put it to the test. We gave the same prompt to both GLM 5.3 Flash and Gemini 3.7 Flash: Build a spectral audio visualizer. Costs: GLM 5.3 Flash: $0.01 Gemini 3.7 Flash: $0.17 17x cheaper for GLM 5.3 Flash. Who won on one-shot results?

Kilo (acq. by Anaconda)

21,683 次观看 • 27 天前

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a busy train interior, then leaving the station. Qwen 3.8 and GLM 5.3 look best to me. but Gemini did it in 1 min 45 secs lol, others took more than 7 mins. Which one wins for you?
0:16

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a busy train interior, then leaving the station. Qwen 3.8 and GLM 5.3 look best to me. but Gemini did it in 1 min 45 secs lol, others took more than 7 mins. Which one wins for you?

Bhavy☄️

24,968 次观看 • 1 个月前

Generated the storyboard with GPT-Image-2, then used Gemini Omni Flash for video generation. The output quality is genuinely impressive — especially the instruction following. Gemini Omni Flash understands cinematic prompts and shot intentions really well.
0:19

Generated the storyboard with GPT-Image-2, then used Gemini Omni Flash for video generation. The output quality is genuinely impressive — especially the instruction following. Gemini Omni Flash understands cinematic prompts and shot intentions really well.

TopviewAI

11,592 次观看 • 4 个月前

This model is insane at landing pages. I asked DeepSeek V4.1 Flash & Claude Fable 5 to build me a landing page for a movie theater. Fable cost $1.21 while V4.1 Flash cost 2.6 cents, making it more than 40x cheaper at similar quality. Gave both the exact same prompt!
0:11

This model is insane at landing pages. I asked DeepSeek V4.1 Flash & Claude Fable 5 to build me a landing page for a movie theater. Fable cost $1.21 while V4.1 Flash cost 2.6 cents, making it more than 40x cheaper at similar quality. Gave both the exact same prompt!

Hassan

55,618 次观看 • 12 天前

I tested again Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a family having lunch in 3D. Qwen 3.8 wins again for me on quality. but Gemini finished in under 2 mins, the others took 6+. Which one wins for you?
0:12

I tested again Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a family having lunch in 3D. Qwen 3.8 wins again for me on quality. but Gemini finished in under 2 mins, the others took 6+. Which one wins for you?

Bhavy☄️

71,444 次观看 • 1 个月前

Ling-3.0-Flash-Sante, Solar Pro 4, MiniMax H3, Kling, Seedance, Gemini 3.8 Flash, and GLM-5.3 Flash - all FREE. > OpenRouter / Novita: Ling-3.0-Flash-Sante (medical MoE). Time-limited: > Freebuff: Solar Pro 4 unlimited this weekend in the coding agent. Coders: > Miora (via VibeEverything tip): MiniMax H3, Kling, Seedance. ~1,000 signup credits, ~3 months to use them. Video + page editors: > APInex: Gemini 3.8 Flash + GLM-5.3 Flash live at $0. Aggregator, not first-party: Fresh stack for this week. Coders, video, medical, Gemini. Grab them while they’re still live.
0:14

Ling-3.0-Flash-Sante, Solar Pro 4, MiniMax H3, Kling, Seedance, Gemini 3.8 Flash, and GLM-5.3 Flash - all FREE. > OpenRouter / Novita: Ling-3.0-Flash-Sante (medical MoE). Time-limited: > Freebuff: Solar Pro 4 unlimited this weekend in the coding agent. Coders: > Miora (via VibeEverything tip): MiniMax H3, Kling, Seedance. ~1,000 signup credits, ~3 months to use them. Video + page editors: > APInex: Gemini 3.8 Flash + GLM-5.3 Flash live at $0. Aggregator, not first-party: Fresh stack for this week. Coders, video, medical, Gemini. Grab them while they’re still live.

ＺＥＦＩ

10,972 次观看 • 16 天前

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 Same prompt, 2 scenes: a harvester and farmers working. honestly? Qwen 3.8 impressed me. it just did what I asked. Grok 4.6 failed on coloring. Qwen>GLM> Grok> Gemini which one did better for you?
0:14

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 Same prompt, 2 scenes: a harvester and farmers working. honestly? Qwen 3.8 impressed me. it just did what I asked. Grok 4.6 failed on coloring. Qwen>GLM> Grok> Gemini which one did better for you?

Bhavy☄️

110,316 次观看 • 1 个月前

Gemini 3.8 Flash has landed in Stitch! 🚀 Your design partner just leveled up: 👁️Attention to Detail: Screens look production-ready faster, with more detailed and realistic UI elements 🖼️Richer Visuals: Generates smarter underlying image prompts, delivering visuals that better align with your page content and brand 🎯 Improved Instruction Following: Grasps complex, nuanced design edits on the first try. See the difference Gemini 3.8 Flash makes in the video below. Sound on and enjoy our new default model! 🔊👇
0:13

Gemini 3.8 Flash has landed in Stitch! 🚀 Your design partner just leveled up: 👁️Attention to Detail: Screens look production-ready faster, with more detailed and realistic UI elements 🖼️Richer Visuals: Generates smarter underlying image prompts, delivering visuals that better align with your page content and brand 🎯 Improved Instruction Following: Grasps complex, nuanced design edits on the first try. See the difference Gemini 3.8 Flash makes in the video below. Sound on and enjoy our new default model! 🔊👇

Stitch by Google

57,386 次观看 • 20 天前

GOOGLE HAS BEEN FAILING PRETTY BADLY TO PUT OUT A MODEL THAT CAN ACTUALLY HANG WITH THE BEST LATELY tested Gemini 3.8 Flash against Kimi K3 on the same Sticky Ball game Flash was insanely fast and used way fewer tokens, but the actual game was nowhere close. K3 had much better mechanics, movement, and overall game design Flash clearly has the speed and efficiency part down, but the gap in what it can actually build is pretty big
0:14

GOOGLE HAS BEEN FAILING PRETTY BADLY TO PUT OUT A MODEL THAT CAN ACTUALLY HANG WITH THE BEST LATELY tested Gemini 3.8 Flash against Kimi K3 on the same Sticky Ball game Flash was insanely fast and used way fewer tokens, but the actual game was nowhere close. K3 had much better mechanics, movement, and overall game design Flash clearly has the speed and efficiency part down, but the gap in what it can actually build is pretty big

aditya

135,587 次观看 • 20 天前

All models are so creative now I gave Gemini 3.7 Flash, Grok 4.6, Qwen 3.8 Max, and Claude Opus 5 an ace of clubs card. And told them to be creative and draw inside the card, using the card as inspo and here are their results
0:15

All models are so creative now I gave Gemini 3.7 Flash, Grok 4.6, Qwen 3.8 Max, and Claude Opus 5 an ace of clubs card. And told them to be creative and draw inside the card, using the card as inspo and here are their results

Ann Nguyen

321,107 次观看 • 1 个月前

Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 is now available on Google's preview model list A cheap AI video model that could directly compete with Seedance 2.5 But if its quality keeps getting better and cheaper, AI video will soon be VERY exciting. But the real question is: Do cheap, high-quality AI videos devalue human artists or empower them? I tried out Gemini Omni Flash 1.1. And I must say that I was shocked by the results
0:10

Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 is now available on Google's preview model list A cheap AI video model that could directly compete with Seedance 2.5 But if its quality keeps getting better and cheaper, AI video will soon be VERY exciting. But the real question is: Do cheap, high-quality AI videos devalue human artists or empower them? I tried out Gemini Omni Flash 1.1. And I must say that I was shocked by the results

Priy

52,896 次观看 • 28 天前

DeepSeek V4 Flash costs just 1% as much as Fable 5 for the same task. Starting Thursday, it’s free and unlimited on Open Design for 7 days.
0:20

DeepSeek V4 Flash costs just 1% as much as Fable 5 for the same task. Starting Thursday, it’s free and unlimited on Open Design for 7 days.

Open Design

11,310 次观看 • 1 个月前

Gemini Omni Flash - monalisa edition 🤩 This model is so coherent in arts and science at the same time zooming in monalisa showing paints to the molecules to atom with coherent text 🤯 omg we are so back and the speed , super hyped for omni pro
0:10

Gemini Omni Flash - monalisa edition 🤩 This model is so coherent in arts and science at the same time zooming in monalisa showing paints to the molecules to atom with coherent text 🤯 omg we are so back and the speed , super hyped for omni pro

Chetaslua

162,167 次观看 • 4 个月前

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna tested both models with the same prompt on highest reasoning > luna one shotted everything in under 3 mins in devin > v4 Flash needed an extra prompt to fix the movement and took over 5 mins in aihubmix cli which one do you think won?
0:17

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna tested both models with the same prompt on highest reasoning > luna one shotted everything in under 3 mins in devin > v4 Flash needed an extra prompt to fix the movement and took over 5 mins in aihubmix cli which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

47,643 次观看 • 1 个月前

Gemini Omni Flash is now live on Fotor. Create and edit AI videos faster with multimodal inputs, seamless scene consistency, and natural language editing—all in one place. Try it now via the link in our bio.
0:16

Gemini Omni Flash is now live on Fotor. Create and edit AI videos faster with multimodal inputs, seamless scene consistency, and natural language editing—all in one place. Try it now via the link in our bio.

Fotor

108,638 次观看 • 2 个月前

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision, Qwen 3.8 Max, and $200 in AI credits all FREEEEE right now😳 access: multiple platforms (see below) bonus: the gap between paid and open keeps shrinking you can now use DeepSeek's first 305B multimodal model, Qwen 3.8 Max with a massive 1M context window, and claim up to $200 in credits for Claude and computer-use agents at zero cost what you get: -deepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision → (305B multimodal, MIT open weights) -Qwen 3.8 Max → (1M context, image input, zero card needed) -KkToken → (signup + daily check-in for up to $100 Claude credits) -novita AI → ($100 Agent Sandbox credits for browser automation) every week the free tier grows, bookmark this list and claim your free access while it lasts
0:18

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision, Qwen 3.8 Max, and $200 in AI credits all FREEEEE right now😳 access: multiple platforms (see below) bonus: the gap between paid and open keeps shrinking you can now use DeepSeek's first 305B multimodal model, Qwen 3.8 Max with a massive 1M context window, and claim up to $200 in credits for Claude and computer-use agents at zero cost what you get: -deepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision → (305B multimodal, MIT open weights) -Qwen 3.8 Max → (1M context, image input, zero card needed) -KkToken → (signup + daily check-in for up to $100 Claude credits) -novita AI → ($100 Agent Sandbox credits for browser automation) every week the free tier grows, bookmark this list and claim your free access while it lasts

Nahid

15,438 次观看 • 21 天前

Local models on the left. Cloud models on the right. I asked Qwen-flash-next, DeepSeek-v4.1, Fable-5.1 and Astra-6 to build an interactive volcanic island with flowing lava and boats that flee. In my opinion deepseek was the winner, and fable the disappointment Try each island yourself: Qwen · Mac Studio DeepSeek · 4× DGX Spark Fable · Cloud Astra · Cloud
0:17

Local models on the left. Cloud models on the right. I asked Qwen-flash-next, DeepSeek-v4.1, Fable-5.1 and Astra-6 to build an interactive volcanic island with flowing lava and boats that flee. In my opinion deepseek was the winner, and fable the disappointment Try each island yourself: Qwen · Mac Studio DeepSeek · 4× DGX Spark Fable · Cloud Astra · Cloud

Wësche

15,234 次观看 • 8 天前

STEP 4: Open Flow AI and log in with your Gmail. Click on "New Project" and switch to "Video" mode. Choose "Frame, 9:16, Omni Flash, 10s and x1." That'll cost 15 credits, out of 50 daily credits. Copy all the Prompt Result in STEP 3, attach it with the same image and run it.
0:10

STEP 4: Open Flow AI and log in with your Gmail. Click on "New Project" and switch to "Video" mode. Choose "Frame, 9:16, Omni Flash, 10s and x1." That'll cost 15 credits, out of 50 daily credits. Copy all the Prompt Result in STEP 3, attach it with the same image and run it.

Olatunde AI

39,328 次观看 • 1 个月前

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next (125B A6B MoE) Vs Qwen 3.8 27B (dense) - Both Q4_K_XL - Reasoning Off Prompt: Create a very high quality realistic video like animation of the solar system. three.js via cdn. Let the camera revolve around. single html file. dont call any tools. dont need any controls. Qwen 3.8 27b focused on computational physics & geometry (inclinations, coordinate math, moon orbits). While Qwen 3.8 125B A6B focused on cinematography & visual UX (lighting contrast, atmospheric glow, framing, and HUD overlays). It also followed the camera instruction correctly and produced result thats visually more stunning. Both the models run on single RTX 3090/4090 (24 GB VRAM). the 27b will fit entirely in the VRAM, but you'd need 100-120GB RAM for the new 125B MoE (check out the previous post for complete inference benchmarks and llama.cpp setup) Qwen 3.8 Flash Next beats Qwen 3.8 27B in almost all the benchmarks. have dropped the intelligence benchmark comparison and unsloth quant huggingface links in the replies. Which one would u be running regularly on your hardware?
0:11

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next (125B A6B MoE) Vs Qwen 3.8 27B (dense) - Both Q4_K_XL - Reasoning Off Prompt: Create a very high quality realistic video like animation of the solar system. three.js via cdn. Let the camera revolve around. single html file. dont call any tools. dont need any controls. Qwen 3.8 27b focused on computational physics & geometry (inclinations, coordinate math, moon orbits). While Qwen 3.8 125B A6B focused on cinematography & visual UX (lighting contrast, atmospheric glow, framing, and HUD overlays). It also followed the camera instruction correctly and produced result thats visually more stunning. Both the models run on single RTX 3090/4090 (24 GB VRAM). the 27b will fit entirely in the VRAM, but you'd need 100-120GB RAM for the new 125B MoE (check out the previous post for complete inference benchmarks and llama.cpp setup) Qwen 3.8 Flash Next beats Qwen 3.8 27B in almost all the benchmarks. have dropped the intelligence benchmark comparison and unsloth quant huggingface links in the replies. Which one would u be running regularly on your hardware?

Alok

33,836 次观看 • 27 天前