Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

I tested again Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a family having lunch in 3D. Qwen 3.8 wins again for me on quality. but Gemini finished in under 2 mins, the others took 6+. Which one wins for you?

Bhavy☄️

6,877 subscribers

71,444 просмотров • 11 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 Same prompt, 2 scenes: a harvester and farmers working. honestly? Qwen 3.8 impressed me. it just did what I asked. Grok 4.6 failed on coloring. Qwen>GLM> Grok> Gemini which one did better for you?

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 Same prompt, 2 scenes: a harvester and farmers working. honestly? Qwen 3.8 impressed me. it just did what I asked. Grok 4.6 failed on coloring. Qwen>GLM> Grok> Gemini which one did better for you?

Bhavy☄️

108,713 просмотров • 12 дней назад

I tested Qwen 3.8 vs Fable 5 Both were made with Renoise CLI. Which output do you like better? Prompt in thread 🧵

I tested Qwen 3.8 vs Fable 5 Both were made with Renoise CLI. Which output do you like better? Prompt in thread 🧵

Kiki

114,297 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna tested both models with the same prompt on highest reasoning > luna one shotted everything in under 3 mins in devin > v4 Flash needed an extra prompt to fix the movement and took over 5 mins in aihubmix cli which one do you think won?

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna tested both models with the same prompt on highest reasoning > luna one shotted everything in under 3 mins in devin > v4 Flash needed an extra prompt to fix the movement and took over 5 mins in aihubmix cli which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

47,565 просмотров • 27 дней назад

Salute to the Qwen team 🫡 We tested Qwen 3.7-Max, Gemini 3.5 Flash, GPT-5.5, and Claude Opus 4.7. The biggest shock came from Qwen. In less than a month (3.6 Max dropped April 20), Qwen went from the worst multimodal output on our sakura tree test, barely keeping up with Gemini, GPT, and Claude , to matching Gemini 3.5 Flash frame for frame on this soccer test, and outperforming GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7. It rendered a perfectly proportioned soccer player and the most lifelike ball in the entire test. Remarkable spatial reasoning. Also: Gemini 3.5 Flash is now faster than GPT-5.5, which used to be the fastest in our past tests.

Salute to the Qwen team 🫡 We tested Qwen 3.7-Max, Gemini 3.5 Flash, GPT-5.5, and Claude Opus 4.7. The biggest shock came from Qwen. In less than a month (3.6 Max dropped April 20), Qwen went from the worst multimodal output on our sakura tree test, barely keeping up with Gemini, GPT, and Claude , to matching Gemini 3.5 Flash frame for frame on this soccer test, and outperforming GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7. It rendered a perfectly proportioned soccer player and the most lifelike ball in the entire test. Remarkable spatial reasoning. Also: Gemini 3.5 Flash is now faster than GPT-5.5, which used to be the fastest in our past tests.

GMI Cloud

75,785 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Claude vs Gemini vs DeepSeek vs Grok PROMPT: Build a production-ready 3D flight visualizer in one HTML file. Use Three.js to render a rotatable Earth and simulate real-time aircraft positions using smooth interpolation. Include polished lighting, a starfield background, and make it responsive for mobile and desktop. Which tool is the best?

Claude vs Gemini vs DeepSeek vs Grok PROMPT: Build a production-ready 3D flight visualizer in one HTML file. Use Three.js to render a rotatable Earth and simulate real-time aircraft positions using smooth interpolation. Include polished lighting, a starfield background, and make it responsive for mobile and desktop. Which tool is the best?

Oleg Bilozor

72,608 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

I tested Qwen 3.8 Max vs Kimi K3 Same scene, lighting, props, detail requirements. Qwen's output is decent, but it's not close to Kimi K3. Qwen's output came out messy, text handling was off, and the composition felt unorganized next to Kimi's version. In my opinion, Qwen isn't second to Fable 5 either, and it's also below GPT-5.6 Sol. It's a solid model, but not at that tier. Kimi K3 is still clearly ahead here.

I tested Qwen 3.8 Max vs Kimi K3 Same scene, lighting, props, detail requirements. Qwen's output is decent, but it's not close to Kimi K3. Qwen's output came out messy, text handling was off, and the composition felt unorganized next to Kimi's version. In my opinion, Qwen isn't second to Fable 5 either, and it's also below GPT-5.6 Sol. It's a solid model, but not at that tier. Kimi K3 is still clearly ahead here.

Bhavy☄️

34,045 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Been using Qwen 3.8 27B (Q4) locally on 64GB of VRAM. Here is the verdict: SLOW 18 tps with ZERO system prompt to process and that degrades significantly with a harness system prompt and as the context window grows. RIP if you have to compact. I had it implement this PRD and it's been running for 6 hours. By comparison Grok 4.6 and Kimi K3 hosted finished in about ~30 minutes. High hopes, but these 27B variants are too dense. This is not a consumer grade local model - and I consider consumer grade to be anything up to $5000.

Been using Qwen 3.8 27B (Q4) locally on 64GB of VRAM. Here is the verdict: SLOW 18 tps with ZERO system prompt to process and that degrades significantly with a harness system prompt and as the context window grows. RIP if you have to compact. I had it implement this PRD and it's been running for 6 hours. By comparison Grok 4.6 and Kimi K3 hosted finished in about ~30 minutes. High hopes, but these 27B variants are too dense. This is not a consumer grade local model - and I consider consumer grade to be anything up to $5000.

Burke Holland

120,737 просмотров • 12 дней назад

🚨Gemini 3.6 Flash is trash I tested it on a 3D Golden Gate Bridge, and the results were awful. • I had to re-prompt it three times because it repeatedly ignored the instructions. • First attempt, instead of creating the requested .html file, it first tried to build the experience inside the Gemini app using simulations. • Then second attempt it started placing images from the web into the chat rather than actually producing the file. • Even after getting it to complete the task, the final output was dramatically worse than Gemini 3.1 Pro, which is 5 months old and now not even a top 10 model on leaderboards. This feels like a regression from Gemini 3.5 Flash and honestly, it is one of the weakest models I have tested in the past few months. Has anyone else tested Gemini 3.6 Flash yet, and are you seeing the same thing?

🚨Gemini 3.6 Flash is trash I tested it on a 3D Golden Gate Bridge, and the results were awful. • I had to re-prompt it three times because it repeatedly ignored the instructions. • First attempt, instead of creating the requested .html file, it first tried to build the experience inside the Gemini app using simulations. • Then second attempt it started placing images from the web into the chat rather than actually producing the file. • Even after getting it to complete the task, the final output was dramatically worse than Gemini 3.1 Pro, which is 5 months old and now not even a top 10 model on leaderboards. This feels like a regression from Gemini 3.5 Flash and honestly, it is one of the weakest models I have tested in the past few months. Has anyone else tested Gemini 3.6 Flash yet, and are you seeing the same thing?

Lumina

72,213 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The Google Gemini can transform your questions and complex topics into custom and interactive visualizations — directly within your chat. Whether you’re rotating a molecule or simulating a complex physics system, you create 3D simulations with just one prompt in Gemini. Try starting your prompt with “show me...,” to get your interactive visualization. For the best results, try using Gemini’s Flash model.

The Google Gemini can transform your questions and complex topics into custom and interactive visualizations — directly within your chat. Whether you’re rotating a molecule or simulating a complex physics system, you create 3D simulations with just one prompt in Gemini. Try starting your prompt with “show me...,” to get your interactive visualization. For the best results, try using Gemini’s Flash model.

Google

279,971 просмотров • 1 день назад

Codex can run Qwen-3.8-max now as well!! Alibaba most capable model, dropped today and it's already in my codex picker. It's a token plan subscription, not metered api billing. You take the key from your Qwen plan, drop it into Codex Router, and it spends down the plan instead of your card. There's a catch though. Qwen's official setup switches your whole codex over to them, so your ChatGPT models stop showing up at all. That's exactly what Codex Router is for. It adds models to the list instead of replacing them, so sol, Grok, kimi, Deepseek and now Qwen 3.8 max all sit in the same picker and it can grab whichever one suits the job. Router's open source, setup's in the video 👇

Codex can run Qwen-3.8-max now as well!! Alibaba most capable model, dropped today and it's already in my codex picker. It's a token plan subscription, not metered api billing. You take the key from your Qwen plan, drop it into Codex Router, and it spends down the plan instead of your card. There's a catch though. Qwen's official setup switches your whole codex over to them, so your ChatGPT models stop showing up at all. That's exactly what Codex Router is for. It adds models to the list instead of replacing them, so sol, Grok, kimi, Deepseek and now Qwen 3.8 max all sit in the same picker and it can grab whichever one suits the job. Router's open source, setup's in the video 👇

Ziwen

407,847 просмотров • 24 дней назад

They’re finally coming to our booth!!!!🎉✨ This is our second time holding this project for KRATING Meen Nichakoon, and we’re excited to have you here again 🥹💗 We really hope you enjoy the game today—no matter which team wins, just know that you both have already won a special place in our hearts 🖤🤍 Black vs White but still TINGMEEN #TingMeenFor3Fight3Final

They’re finally coming to our booth!!!!🎉✨ This is our second time holding this project for KRATING Meen Nichakoon, and we’re excited to have you here again 🥹💗 We really hope you enjoy the game today—no matter which team wins, just know that you both have already won a special place in our hearts 🖤🤍 Black vs White but still TINGMEEN #TingMeenFor3Fight3Final

Tingmeenation INA 🇮🇩

37,928 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Perfume brands are paying agencies $50k for ads you can now make for under $2 😳 i tested it myself same prompt, two ai models. MiniMax H3 vs Seedance 2.5 seedance charged me 4x more. H3 still looked better what H3 got right: > the glass and lighting look real, not ai > brand name on the bottle came out clean, no melted text > 2k quality, 15 second videos > starts at $0.081 per second if you make ads, product videos or brand content, this is the cheapest way to look expensive both videos below, which one won? 👇

Isra

40,898 просмотров • 17 дней назад

This was 6 years ago vs Now. I've struggled with trying hard but not seeing results (even though others do apparently). My Doc referred me for Ozempic which I have no interest in. At present, I think I'm content with just keeping on keeping on with my body as is.

This was 6 years ago vs Now. I've struggled with trying hard but not seeing results (even though others do apparently). My Doc referred me for Ozempic which I have no interest in. At present, I think I'm content with just keeping on keeping on with my body as is.

The_Gogobear

20,121 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🔴INDIA WTC RACE IS GETTING SERIOUSLY TOUGH 🤯 - India get 12 crucial points from this win. - A 2-0 series win vs Sri Lanka would take India to 57.58% PCT. - If Australia beat Bangladesh, Bangladesh could drop to 55.56% PCT. - India would then move to 4th, with Bangladesh falling to 5th. - Next challenge: 2 Tests vs New Zealand. - Then comes a massive 5-Test series vs Australia at home. - India have only 9 Tests left in this WTC cycle. - They likely need 7+ wins to remain seriously in the top-two race. - 7 wins + 2 losses = 62.96% PCT. - 8 wins + 1 loss = 68.52% PCT. - Last cycle’s finalists finished on 69.44% and 67.54%. - Realistically, India may need 8 wins from their final 9 Tests. In short: India have almost zero room for error. One bad series could seriously hurt their WTC qualification hopes. 🇮🇳

🔴INDIA WTC RACE IS GETTING SERIOUSLY TOUGH 🤯 - India get 12 crucial points from this win. - A 2-0 series win vs Sri Lanka would take India to 57.58% PCT. - If Australia beat Bangladesh, Bangladesh could drop to 55.56% PCT. - India would then move to 4th, with Bangladesh falling to 5th. - Next challenge: 2 Tests vs New Zealand. - Then comes a massive 5-Test series vs Australia at home. - India have only 9 Tests left in this WTC cycle. - They likely need 7+ wins to remain seriously in the top-two race. - 7 wins + 2 losses = 62.96% PCT. - 8 wins + 1 loss = 68.52% PCT. - Last cycle’s finalists finished on 69.44% and 67.54%. - Realistically, India may need 8 wins from their final 9 Tests. In short: India have almost zero room for error. One bad series could seriously hurt their WTC qualification hopes. 🇮🇳

Sam

233,677 просмотров • 8 дней назад

I travelled by train for 4 years during my engineering days. The journey was from Vijayawada to Allahabad, and the train continued into Bihar. It was nasty once you cross Itarsi. Same train in south India was different vs. once it enters north. Crowded, uncivilised and dangerous. Those 4 years killed my appetite for train travel in India. Once I started earning, I never took a train again🚆

I travelled by train for 4 years during my engineering days. The journey was from Vijayawada to Allahabad, and the train continued into Bihar. It was nasty once you cross Itarsi. Same train in south India was different vs. once it enters north. Crowded, uncivilised and dangerous. Those 4 years killed my appetite for train travel in India. Once I started earning, I never took a train again🚆

Vineeth K

362,510 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

A WHALE HAS FIGURED OUT HOW TO WIN A TENNIS MATCH NO MATTER WHO WINS IT Same play every time. A small farm on the longshot, the main size on the favorite, and he scalps the swing between them. Kostyuk vs Swiatek is the clearest example: → $4,824 on Kostyuk at 4c → $98,883 on Swiatek at 70c The Kostyuk ticket runs up, and he sells it for a 439 percent gain, $26,009 out. He trades the Swiatek size out in the green too. Two green tickets on a match where only one player could win, then he does it again and again in the next matches.

A WHALE HAS FIGURED OUT HOW TO WIN A TENNIS MATCH NO MATTER WHO WINS IT Same play every time. A small farm on the longshot, the main size on the favorite, and he scalps the swing between them. Kostyuk vs Swiatek is the clearest example: → $4,824 on Kostyuk at 4c → $98,883 on Swiatek at 70c The Kostyuk ticket runs up, and he sells it for a 439 percent gain, $26,009 out. He trades the Swiatek size out in the green too. Two green tickets on a match where only one player could win, then he does it again and again in the next matches.

RCOM

68,612 просмотров • 14 дней назад

TAA VS FSR 4 VS DLSS 4.5 at a super-low resolution so you can see how each one reconstructs the image better. In this scenario, I've used Assassins Creed: Shadows on two different machines using the same settings and set the following settings for upscaling. In-game resolution at 720p and changed the resolution scaling to 20% (144p) while keeping the sharpness at 30% Which one looks better?

TAA VS FSR 4 VS DLSS 4.5 at a super-low resolution so you can see how each one reconstructs the image better. In this scenario, I've used Assassins Creed: Shadows on two different machines using the same settings and set the following settings for upscaling. In-game resolution at 720p and changed the resolution scaling to 20% (144p) while keeping the sharpness at 30% Which one looks better?

NikTek

55,738 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

i just generated this AI UGC creative for a teeth whitening product in 10 minutes in Higgsfield (you can now generate in 1080p)... here's my workflow: > deploy a research agent to find UGC style videos that promote products like the one you wanna make a creative for > use gemini 2.5 flash to analyze the creative & get a detailed analysis of each scene (get it to add a placeholder for each image reference in your prompt) > use GPT-image 2 in Higgsfield to extract a frame from each cut-scene & use it as a reference for your generation in the prompt wherever there's a placeholder > send the prompt + all the references to Higgsfields video generator & select Seedance 2.5, then generate it > once you have a finished product, take it to a video editor & add captions / cuts / zooms / music

i just generated this AI UGC creative for a teeth whitening product in 10 minutes in Higgsfield (you can now generate in 1080p)... here's my workflow: > deploy a research agent to find UGC style videos that promote products like the one you wanna make a creative for > use gemini 2.5 flash to analyze the creative & get a detailed analysis of each scene (get it to add a placeholder for each image reference in your prompt) > use GPT-image 2 in Higgsfield to extract a frame from each cut-scene & use it as a reference for your generation in the prompt wherever there's a placeholder > send the prompt + all the references to Higgsfields video generator & select Seedance 2.5, then generate it > once you have a finished product, take it to a video editor & add captions / cuts / zooms / music

EP

28,949 просмотров • 12 дней назад