Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

random fusion

idogedochiptune

3,841 subscribers

17,056 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

slow fusion

slow fusion

idogedochiptune

49,998 views • 1 year ago

We've been doing fusion all wrong. Tokamaks will never work because they're inefficient and dependent upon random chance. Throw out the Maxwell-Boltzman distributions and shift to non-equilibrium configurations. Cool fusion uses lasers tuned to the exact ion temperatures and collides them. Controlled thermonuclear fusion.

We've been doing fusion all wrong. Tokamaks will never work because they're inefficient and dependent upon random chance. Throw out the Maxwell-Boltzman distributions and shift to non-equilibrium configurations. Cool fusion uses lasers tuned to the exact ion temperatures and collides them. Controlled thermonuclear fusion.

Ashton Forbes

16,763 views • 6 months ago

glace castle

glace castle

idogedochiptune

13,031 views • 1 year ago

a bit of house

a bit of house

idogedochiptune

20,461 views • 1 year ago

strange encounter

strange encounter

idogedochiptune

27,856 views • 2 years ago

watched my friends play deltarune nes game

watched my friends play deltarune nes game

idogedochiptune

20,802 views • 1 year ago

last one for the year! links below

last one for the year! links below

idogedochiptune

18,880 views • 2 years ago

some fun in 6/8

some fun in 6/8

idogedochiptune

28,835 views • 1 year ago

clear essence

clear essence

idogedochiptune

15,207 views • 2 years ago

A leading MIT professor whose work aimed to unlock clean, near limitless fusion energy was shot and killed inside his Brookline, Massachusetts apartment, raising growing questions about motive. Authorities say 47 year old Nuno Loureiro, a professor of nuclear science and engineering and physics at MIT and director of the Plasma Science and Fusion Center, was pronounced dead at a hospital after neighbors reported hearing multiple gunshots. As investigators continue to search for answers, speculation is mounting over whether the killing was random or whether Loureiro may have been targeted because of his groundbreaking work. Watch OAN Live here:

A leading MIT professor whose work aimed to unlock clean, near limitless fusion energy was shot and killed inside his Brookline, Massachusetts apartment, raising growing questions about motive. Authorities say 47 year old Nuno Loureiro, a professor of nuclear science and engineering and physics at MIT and director of the Plasma Science and Fusion Center, was pronounced dead at a hospital after neighbors reported hearing multiple gunshots. As investigators continue to search for answers, speculation is mounting over whether the killing was random or whether Loureiro may have been targeted because of his groundbreaking work. Watch OAN Live here:

One America News

119,227 views • 8 months ago

🚨 11 SCIENTISTS. 24 MONTHS. ALL DEAD OR MISSING — AND THE CONNECTION DOESN’T MAKE SENSE A man on camera lays out 11 names. U.S. scientists and engineers... all gone in the last 2 years. At first, it sounds random. Then you see what they were working on: • Advanced propulsion • Nuclear weapons (Los Alamos clearance) • Orbital communications • Plasma physics + fusion • Experimental drug development • Air Force R&D (hypersonics, directed energy) Not random fields. This is high-clearance, future-facing tech. Then the pattern starts tightening: Some found dead under unclear circumstances. Others vanish with almost no public detail. One leaves home without wallet or keys… never seen again. Different people. Different locations. Same level of access. Same type of work. Same outcome... gone. 11 names. One pattern. Individually? You’d never connect it. Stacked together… it’s harder to ignore. At what point does this stop being coincidence?

🚨 11 SCIENTISTS. 24 MONTHS. ALL DEAD OR MISSING — AND THE CONNECTION DOESN’T MAKE SENSE A man on camera lays out 11 names. U.S. scientists and engineers... all gone in the last 2 years. At first, it sounds random. Then you see what they were working on: • Advanced propulsion • Nuclear weapons (Los Alamos clearance) • Orbital communications • Plasma physics + fusion • Experimental drug development • Air Force R&D (hypersonics, directed energy) Not random fields. This is high-clearance, future-facing tech. Then the pattern starts tightening: Some found dead under unclear circumstances. Others vanish with almost no public detail. One leaves home without wallet or keys… never seen again. Different people. Different locations. Same level of access. Same type of work. Same outcome... gone. 11 names. One pattern. Individually? You’d never connect it. Stacked together… it’s harder to ignore. At what point does this stop being coincidence?

HustleBitch

20,925 views • 4 months ago

Demonstrating our latest localization system in action. At bootup, the robot has no prior position estimate, but within seconds it autonomously localizes itself using a fusion of three algorithms. Unlike our previous version, this updated system incorporates vision, allowing the robot to adapt to real-world changes (e.g., moved furniture) by recognizing previously seen environments. In this demo, we repeatedly reset navigation and reposition the robot to random locations, showing robust, repeatable localization. The robot then executes a full patrol, following a planned path (visualized in RViz) with real-time path tracking. Because our software is hardware-agnostic, it brings the same reliable performance to any robot it runs on.

Demonstrating our latest localization system in action. At bootup, the robot has no prior position estimate, but within seconds it autonomously localizes itself using a fusion of three algorithms. Unlike our previous version, this updated system incorporates vision, allowing the robot to adapt to real-world changes (e.g., moved furniture) by recognizing previously seen environments. In this demo, we repeatedly reset navigation and reposition the robot to random locations, showing robust, repeatable localization. The robot then executes a full patrol, following a planned path (visualized in RViz) with real-time path tracking. Because our software is hardware-agnostic, it brings the same reliable performance to any robot it runs on.

OpenMind

23,954 views • 4 months ago

🚨 MIT PROFESSOR SHOT DEAD IN HIS HOME - HE WAS WORKING ON TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD HAVE BROKEN THE ENERGY SYSTEM MIT professor of nuclear science and engineering and of physics, Nuno Loureiro was shot inside his home and later died at a local hospital. Police say no motive has been announced. No suspect identified. But what’s setting off alarm bells is what he was researching. Before his death, Loureiro was working on two frontier technologies at MIT: • Nuclear fusion stabilization - research aimed at unlocking a near limitless, low cost energy source that could disrupt coal, oil, and the global power structure • Quantum computing - designing advanced algorithms to simulate plasma behavior, a key step toward machines that could dwarf today’s phones and laptops These aren’t side projects. These are civilization-level technologies with massive economic and geopolitical consequences. Fusion energy alone threatens trillion dollar industries. Quantum computing threatens encryption, finance, defense, and surveillance systems. Authorities insist there is no announced connection between his research and the shooting. But people are asking the uncomfortable question anyway: When someone working on world changing technology is killed at home… how often is it really “just random”?

🚨 MIT PROFESSOR SHOT DEAD IN HIS HOME - HE WAS WORKING ON TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD HAVE BROKEN THE ENERGY SYSTEM MIT professor of nuclear science and engineering and of physics, Nuno Loureiro was shot inside his home and later died at a local hospital. Police say no motive has been announced. No suspect identified. But what’s setting off alarm bells is what he was researching. Before his death, Loureiro was working on two frontier technologies at MIT: • Nuclear fusion stabilization - research aimed at unlocking a near limitless, low cost energy source that could disrupt coal, oil, and the global power structure • Quantum computing - designing advanced algorithms to simulate plasma behavior, a key step toward machines that could dwarf today’s phones and laptops These aren’t side projects. These are civilization-level technologies with massive economic and geopolitical consequences. Fusion energy alone threatens trillion dollar industries. Quantum computing threatens encryption, finance, defense, and surveillance systems. Authorities insist there is no announced connection between his research and the shooting. But people are asking the uncomfortable question anyway: When someone working on world changing technology is killed at home… how often is it really “just random”?

HustleBitch

399,087 views • 8 months ago

This group, showcasing their perfectly synchronized, professional-level dance, isn't just a random group of soldiers; it's a special team comprised of active K-POP idols currently serving in the military. They performed this dance at the "Gyeryongdae Ground Forces Expo," the largest official publicity event for the military, held annually in the fall in South Korea. This performance isn't simply a collection of idols dancing together. The team includes professional backup dancers and choreographers who are currently serving, and they have created and produced a new "dance break" (showcase) that looks great in military uniforms. This is truly a miraculous, world-class performance video born from the fusion of "South Korea's conscription system" and "world-class K-POP culture," something you can only see in the military.

This group, showcasing their perfectly synchronized, professional-level dance, isn't just a random group of soldiers; it's a special team comprised of active K-POP idols currently serving in the military. They performed this dance at the "Gyeryongdae Ground Forces Expo," the largest official publicity event for the military, held annually in the fall in South Korea. This performance isn't simply a collection of idols dancing together. The team includes professional backup dancers and choreographers who are currently serving, and they have created and produced a new "dance break" (showcase) that looks great in military uniforms. This is truly a miraculous, world-class performance video born from the fusion of "South Korea's conscription system" and "world-class K-POP culture," something you can only see in the military.

knockout☆

12,945 views • 3 months ago

Boulder Firebomb Proves Marx-Jihad Mob Is Already At War Every torched storefront and blood-slick sidewalk says it: this isn’t random chaos. It’s an ideology on the march. Today a fire-bomber crashed a Jewish-solidarity rally in Boulder, hurled gasoline bombs, and screamed “How many kids have you killed?” while people burned. Days earlier a Jewish couple was gunned down outside D.C.’s Holocaust museum—two coasts, one playbook. This is the Marx-Jihad fusion I flagged weeks ago: grievance Marxism married to jihad’s license to kill, churning out radicals who think they’re both Che and the Angel of Death. End-stage liberalism calls it “mostly peaceful,” universities chant decolonization, and the infection spreads. Enough. Name the ideology, break its networks, prosecute its foot soldiers, and stop pretending tolerance will tame arsonists. Boulder’s victims demand more than hashtags; they demand spine. 🇺🇸

Boulder Firebomb Proves Marx-Jihad Mob Is Already At War Every torched storefront and blood-slick sidewalk says it: this isn’t random chaos. It’s an ideology on the march. Today a fire-bomber crashed a Jewish-solidarity rally in Boulder, hurled gasoline bombs, and screamed “How many kids have you killed?” while people burned. Days earlier a Jewish couple was gunned down outside D.C.’s Holocaust museum—two coasts, one playbook. This is the Marx-Jihad fusion I flagged weeks ago: grievance Marxism married to jihad’s license to kill, churning out radicals who think they’re both Che and the Angel of Death. End-stage liberalism calls it “mostly peaceful,” universities chant decolonization, and the infection spreads. Enough. Name the ideology, break its networks, prosecute its foot soldiers, and stop pretending tolerance will tame arsonists. Boulder’s victims demand more than hashtags; they demand spine. 🇺🇸

Walter Curt

30,997 views • 1 year ago

eFootball - The best way to give additional skill to your player 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿Have you ever wanted to give your players additional skills by repeatedly using random skills and still not getting the skills you wanted? Maybe you're using the wrong method. Here's a tip for getting the additional skills you want: Go to Contract > Standard Player > Buy Raquel Lombardy 5 times (or any player with a price of 0) > Go to My Team > Players > Select Raquel Lombardy > Give him skill training. Do this for all Raquel Lombardy players or other players with a price of 0. This way, you'll have a wide stock of additional skills which are ready to use. Next, go to My Team > Select the player you want to give additional skills to > Perform Player Fusion > Select Raquel Lombardi with the desired skill, for example, "Super Sub," and confirm. You will give the correct additional skill to the player you want, and you'll have a stock of additional skills for your other players. Hope this tips helps 🙏 ------------------------------ eFootball - Cara terbaik memberikan Additional Skill kepada pemain kamu 🇮🇩 Pernahkah kamu ingin memberikan Additional Skill kepada pemain kamu dengan menggunakan random skill berulang kali dan kamu tetap tidak mendapatkan skill yang kamu inginkan? mungkin kamu menggunakan cara yang salah Berikut adalah tip untuk mendapatkan skill tambahan sesuai keinginan kamu pergi ke contract > standard player > beli raquel lombardy sebanyak 5 kali (atau siapapun pemain dengan harga 0) > masuk ke my team > players > pilih raquel lombardy > berikan skill training kepadanya. lakukan ke semua raquel lombardy atau pemain harga 0 yang kamu miliki. dengan begitu kamu akan memiliki berbagai stok additional skill yang siap kamu gunakan Selanjutnya masuk ke My Team > pilih pemain yang ingin kamu berikan additional skill > lakukan Player Fusion > Pilih Raquel Lombardi dengan skill yang kamu inginkan misalnya"supersub" dan konfirm Kamu akan memberikan additional skill yang tepat kepada pemain yang kamu inginkan dan kamu akan memiliki stok additional skill untuk pemainmu yang lain. Semoga tips ini membantu 🙏 #eFootball #eFootball2026 #eFootballindonesia #PESindonesia

eFootball - The best way to give additional skill to your player 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿Have you ever wanted to give your players additional skills by repeatedly using random skills and still not getting the skills you wanted? Maybe you're using the wrong method. Here's a tip for getting the additional skills you want: Go to Contract > Standard Player > Buy Raquel Lombardy 5 times (or any player with a price of 0) > Go to My Team > Players > Select Raquel Lombardy > Give him skill training. Do this for all Raquel Lombardy players or other players with a price of 0. This way, you'll have a wide stock of additional skills which are ready to use. Next, go to My Team > Select the player you want to give additional skills to > Perform Player Fusion > Select Raquel Lombardi with the desired skill, for example, "Super Sub," and confirm. You will give the correct additional skill to the player you want, and you'll have a stock of additional skills for your other players. Hope this tips helps 🙏 ------------------------------ eFootball - Cara terbaik memberikan Additional Skill kepada pemain kamu 🇮🇩 Pernahkah kamu ingin memberikan Additional Skill kepada pemain kamu dengan menggunakan random skill berulang kali dan kamu tetap tidak mendapatkan skill yang kamu inginkan? mungkin kamu menggunakan cara yang salah Berikut adalah tip untuk mendapatkan skill tambahan sesuai keinginan kamu pergi ke contract > standard player > beli raquel lombardy sebanyak 5 kali (atau siapapun pemain dengan harga 0) > masuk ke my team > players > pilih raquel lombardy > berikan skill training kepadanya. lakukan ke semua raquel lombardy atau pemain harga 0 yang kamu miliki. dengan begitu kamu akan memiliki berbagai stok additional skill yang siap kamu gunakan Selanjutnya masuk ke My Team > pilih pemain yang ingin kamu berikan additional skill > lakukan Player Fusion > Pilih Raquel Lombardi dengan skill yang kamu inginkan misalnya"supersub" dan konfirm Kamu akan memberikan additional skill yang tepat kepada pemain yang kamu inginkan dan kamu akan memiliki stok additional skill untuk pemainmu yang lain. Semoga tips ini membantu 🙏 #eFootball #eFootball2026 #eFootballindonesia #PESindonesia

harry arfianda

25,726 views • 9 months ago

Dead or Missing : The Scientists linked to TOP SECRET projects keep going missing "Eight scientists, all missing or dead, and the government still has no answers. People who know the most classified secrets in America are disappearing." A NASA linked material scientist hiked in California and never returned. An astrophysicist shot on his porch. Phones wiped. Classified ties everywhere. Monica Jacinto Reza (aerospace/materials scientist, NASA/Aerojet ties, missing June 2025 while hiking) Melissa Casias (Los Alamos National Lab employee, missing June 2025) William Neil McCasland (retired Air Force General, advanced research programs, missing 2025/2026) Carl Grillmair (Caltech astrophysicist with NASA NEO Surveyor ties, shot and killed 2026) Nuno Loureiro (MIT plasma/fusion physicist, shot and killed 2025) Frank Maiwald (NASA JPL researcher, died 2024) Anthony Chavez (former Los Alamos employee, missing 2025) Jason Thomas (pharmaceutical researcher with potential ties, body found 2026) Michael David Hicks (NASA JPL), Steven Garcia (government contractor) What’s really happening to these experts? Coincidence or something darker? What do you think random tragedies or a pattern?

Dead or Missing : The Scientists linked to TOP SECRET projects keep going missing "Eight scientists, all missing or dead, and the government still has no answers. People who know the most classified secrets in America are disappearing." A NASA linked material scientist hiked in California and never returned. An astrophysicist shot on his porch. Phones wiped. Classified ties everywhere. Monica Jacinto Reza (aerospace/materials scientist, NASA/Aerojet ties, missing June 2025 while hiking) Melissa Casias (Los Alamos National Lab employee, missing June 2025) William Neil McCasland (retired Air Force General, advanced research programs, missing 2025/2026) Carl Grillmair (Caltech astrophysicist with NASA NEO Surveyor ties, shot and killed 2026) Nuno Loureiro (MIT plasma/fusion physicist, shot and killed 2025) Frank Maiwald (NASA JPL researcher, died 2024) Anthony Chavez (former Los Alamos employee, missing 2025) Jason Thomas (pharmaceutical researcher with potential ties, body found 2026) Michael David Hicks (NASA JPL), Steven Garcia (government contractor) What’s really happening to these experts? Coincidence or something darker? What do you think random tragedies or a pattern?

Interstellar

19,319 views • 4 months ago

Dr. Daugherity exposes the printer "glitch" and why 7,000 ballots every 30 minutes were rejected, proving that Maricopa County's printers were deliberately misconfigured in the 2020 election, turning thousands of ballots into unreadable rejects, which forced ballots into manual adjudication, where there is NO oversight, NO transparency, and NO paper trail. This same glitch happened all over the country where taxpayers votes are in the hands of a few people, in private, that can change hundreds of thousands of votes at the click of a button. Massive, non-random misfeeds, up to 7,000 ballots rejected every 30 minutes all day (far exceeding the legal 1-in-500 max misfeed rate). Hit 17K+ total in Maricopa, mostly in key vote centers. Changed from "heavy" to "normal" fusion. Timing marks (the critical black sync lines scanners need) came out too light/blotchy, toner never fused properly, so tabulators spat ballots back as "invalid/photocopy." 5% image shrinkage sabotage, ballot images printed at 19" instead of 20" length → edge markers + timing sync marks shrank/misaligned. Scanners threw constant errors, "edge marker #39 not found," "Determine Vertical edge markers failed," "Ballot misread." Daugherity calls it statistically impossible as "accidental" and accuses deliberate tampering to disrupt tabulation and open the door to manipulation. This isn't conspiracy, it's cold, hard engineering proof from the guy who reverse-engineered the exact PID-style vote control in prior AZ races.

Dr. Daugherity exposes the printer "glitch" and why 7,000 ballots every 30 minutes were rejected, proving that Maricopa County's printers were deliberately misconfigured in the 2020 election, turning thousands of ballots into unreadable rejects, which forced ballots into manual adjudication, where there is NO oversight, NO transparency, and NO paper trail. This same glitch happened all over the country where taxpayers votes are in the hands of a few people, in private, that can change hundreds of thousands of votes at the click of a button. Massive, non-random misfeeds, up to 7,000 ballots rejected every 30 minutes all day (far exceeding the legal 1-in-500 max misfeed rate). Hit 17K+ total in Maricopa, mostly in key vote centers. Changed from "heavy" to "normal" fusion. Timing marks (the critical black sync lines scanners need) came out too light/blotchy, toner never fused properly, so tabulators spat ballots back as "invalid/photocopy." 5% image shrinkage sabotage, ballot images printed at 19" instead of 20" length → edge markers + timing sync marks shrank/misaligned. Scanners threw constant errors, "edge marker #39 not found," "Determine Vertical edge markers failed," "Ballot misread." Daugherity calls it statistically impossible as "accidental" and accuses deliberate tampering to disrupt tabulation and open the door to manipulation. This isn't conspiracy, it's cold, hard engineering proof from the guy who reverse-engineered the exact PID-style vote control in prior AZ races.

The SCIF

64,057 views • 4 months ago

$i built an AI weather trading bot for Polymarket. it prints. 240 days live. Sharpe: +1.09 Win rate: 23.8% (vs ~9% random baseline) Max drawdown: 6x smaller than naive it beats ARIMA. it beats XGBoost. it beats ensembles. Copytrade the wallets I’m tracking → not by predicting better — by being calibrated. how it works: NOAA data + ECMWF ensembles + NWS forecast discussions → Claude as probability fusion layer → converts uncertainty into an 11-bin distribution (via Gaussian CDF) → scans Polymarket order books → trades only when edge >10 percentage points → sizes with fractional Kelly → hedges on high-uncertainty days why it works: most markets are noise. politics. sports. narratives. emotion. you can’t model chaos. AI loses there the same way it loses to drunks in poker. weather is different. weather is physics. NOAA models are public. ECMWF ensembles are public. NWS discussions literally explain where models disagree. the information exists. the market just doesn’t price it correctly. retail traders cluster in the middle bins. “probably around here.” they ignore the tails. that’s the edge. when a tail is priced at 2% and reality says 8% that’s 4x mispricing. you don’t need to be right often. you need to be right enough. what convinced me it’s real: calibration: when the model says 30% it hits ~30% most models fail here. this one doesn’t. out-of-sample: trained on 160 days tested on 80 unseen Sharpe barely drops: +1.25 → +1.10 edge survives reality. sensitivity: 36 parameter combos (all profitable) this isn’t curve fit. it’s structural. baseline comparison: Brier score: Claude: 0.706 XGBoost: 0.729 Ensemble: 0.794 ARIMA: 1.052 it wins where it matters: probability. people are still debating if AI can trade. meanwhile, some of us already shipped bots and let them run. most of you will do nothing. you’ll bookmark this. tell yourself “later.” come back in 6 months when the edge is gone. a few of you won’t. you’ll spin up a repo tonight. plug in an API. paper trade by morning. those are the only ones who get paid. weather markets won’t stay inefficient forever. there’s mispricing almost every day. physics doesn’t care if you show up late. the bottleneck isn’t alpha. it isn’t capital. it’s whether you start now or watch it disappear.$

i built an AI weather trading bot for Polymarket. it prints. 240 days live. Sharpe: +1.09 Win rate: 23.8% (vs ~9% random baseline) Max drawdown: 6x smaller than naive it beats ARIMA. it beats XGBoost. it beats ensembles. Copytrade the wallets I’m tracking → not by predicting better — by being calibrated. how it works: NOAA data + ECMWF ensembles + NWS forecast discussions → Claude as probability fusion layer → converts uncertainty into an 11-bin distribution (via Gaussian CDF) → scans Polymarket order books → trades only when edge >10 percentage points → sizes with fractional Kelly → hedges on high-uncertainty days why it works: most markets are noise. politics. sports. narratives. emotion. you can’t model chaos. AI loses there the same way it loses to drunks in poker. weather is different. weather is physics. NOAA models are public. ECMWF ensembles are public. NWS discussions literally explain where models disagree. the information exists. the market just doesn’t price it correctly. retail traders cluster in the middle bins. “probably around here.” they ignore the tails. that’s the edge. when a tail is priced at 2% and reality says 8% that’s 4x mispricing. you don’t need to be right often. you need to be right enough. what convinced me it’s real: calibration: when the model says 30% it hits ~30% most models fail here. this one doesn’t. out-of-sample: trained on 160 days tested on 80 unseen Sharpe barely drops: +1.25 → +1.10 edge survives reality. sensitivity: 36 parameter combos (all profitable) this isn’t curve fit. it’s structural. baseline comparison: Brier score: Claude: 0.706 XGBoost: 0.729 Ensemble: 0.794 ARIMA: 1.052 it wins where it matters: probability. people are still debating if AI can trade. meanwhile, some of us already shipped bots and let them run. most of you will do nothing. you’ll bookmark this. tell yourself “later.” come back in 6 months when the edge is gone. a few of you won’t. you’ll spin up a repo tonight. plug in an API. paper trade by morning. those are the only ones who get paid. weather markets won’t stay inefficient forever. there’s mispricing almost every day. physics doesn’t care if you show up late. the bottleneck isn’t alpha. it isn’t capital. it’s whether you start now or watch it disappear.

Discover

12,660 views • 4 months ago