Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Random Wow! A 3 minute discussion stopped a Kes. 95 million nefarious payout plan. I highlight this exchange by Justice Kiage, Justice Odunga, and Nelson Havi for its Public Interest angle… Official Receiver is running a criminal enterprise, and at some point William Samoei Ruto, PhD should send this... guy packing if Dorcas_Oduor won’t do it. The night before the Court of Appeal hearing on the appeal on CHYS real estate liquidation orders, the former Administrator, Kereto Marima, who had filed the appeal on behalf of creditors in 2021, suddenly changes advocates 4 years later & the night before hearing, with all the submissions filed and pleadings closed, and without permission from Creditors, and stops picking calls from his former advocate - Anthony Leshan. The PLOT is to withdraw and or compromise the appeal so that the liquidation, sales to the usual connected friends, and subsequent dismantling and plunder, can proceed without any legal hindrance. We are reliably informed that Mark Gakuru, reached out to Kereto Marima who is his licensee as administrator, and asked him to change lawyers and instruct the new lawyers Hernia Anzala to withdraw / compromise the appeal against liquidation. In return, Kerato was promised payment of a kes. 95 million fee note if his withdrawal led to liquidation. There is a reason why no insolvency has ever succeeded… Mark Gakuru is running a criminal enterprise, he is essentially the Official Fraudster of the Republic of Kenya. This is against public interest. Glad the court caught them pants down.show more

Edwin H. Dande

19,585 subscribers

46,686 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

maureen atieno1 year ago

@NelsonHavi @WilliamsRuto @ehdande YOU WILL PAY US BACK OUR MONEY. IF ACCORDING TO YOU THE OR HAS NEVER SUCCEEDED IN ANY INSOLVENCY CASE, THIS WILL BE THE FIRST ONE. YOU CAN'T CON US OUR HARD EARNED MONEY AND EXPECT TO GO SCOTT FREE. LIPA PESA YETU!!! 🤬🤬🤬

Lale M1 year ago

@NelsonHavi @WilliamsRuto Sadly whenever you speak you tend to be chasing social relevance. You are insensitive, dishonest, and inconsistent; your actions during this process of recovering creditors funds invested with Cytonn have been questionable.

Lale M1 year ago

@NelsonHavi @WilliamsRuto Why have you been interfering with the legal process? You should let justice prevail and stop playing games with Cytonn creditors and legitimate home owners at the Alma. Stop trying to mislead people.

Christine K. Rukunga1 year ago

@NelsonHavi @WilliamsRuto So how will Kenyans that you CONNED 14B ever recover their hard earned cash if not thro' the OR? U should be sued 4defarmation on top of loosing all other litigations u hav been filing 4delaying tactics. Its all over now @ehdande !!!

maureen atieno1 year ago

@NelsonHavi @WilliamsRuto LIES FROM THE PITS OF HELL. THE OR's office should sue you for these allegations.

Edwin H. Dande1 year ago

@NelsonHavi @WilliamsRuto I welcome the suit, they are fraudsters, and they know it! And we have evidence.

nesh1 year ago

@NelsonHavi @WilliamsRuto You are the criminal here. We know you, crying wolf. Cry some more criminal !!!!!

wanjala wanyama1 year ago

@NelsonHavi @WilliamsRuto Shame on you know how many families you have killed with your stupid and endless litigations using their money.I pray you meet a very horrible end.

Ciru Kamau1 year ago

@NelsonHavi @WilliamsRuto Dande is the criminal, and he is gaslighting the OR so that he doesn't pay the creditors. Dande, you will not sway the Judges and the OR, they are not corrupt like you. 14M umekata kulipa innocent creditors... Shame on you!

Beauty bejela1 year ago

@NelsonHavi @WilliamsRuto Look who is talking, with 14b that cytonn conned investors!

Related Videos

BREAKING: Justice delayed for jailed schoolteacher Enoch Burke who refused to use “they” pronoun Judge gives Appeal Panel two weeks to prepare their excuses for a shambolic hearing in December that broke every rule in the book. Enoch Burke was dismissed from Wilson’s Hospital School after he refused to call a student by a new name and the “they” pronoun. He appealed his dismissal to the Disciplinary Appeal Panel (DAP). This three person panel contained a barrister, a teachers union vice president and a member of a school principals organisation. At the appeal hearing on the 13th of December, Enoch Burke was subjected to an Appeal Panel that blocked cross-examination of witnesses from the school, denied Enoch fair procedures and abruptly ended the hearing without closing submissions. After Enoch Burke raised serious concerns, the Appeal Panel (DAP) cobbled together an additional hearing for this Saturday the 10th of January 2026. However it is now clear the DAP appeal cannot proceed with the same panel members that denied Enoch Burke basic rights, one of whom is a former ASTI Vice-President who blatantly stated at the outset of the hearing “If I were instructed by my principal to call a child whatever, I have to implement that instruction, I don’t make the instruction”. Enoch Burke’s application for an injunction halting the Appeal Panel’s handling of his appeal was due to be heard by the High Court this morning at 11am. One minute before the proceedings were due to start, a solicitor for the Appeal Panel approached Enoch Burke and informed him that the so-called “re-convened” hearing on Saturday 10th January would be cancelled. The High Court granted the DAP time to file a replying affidavit. The matter is back in the High Court on Wednesday, 21st January 2026. It is a scandal that Enoch Burke has to fight to simply get a fair hearing of his appeal.

BREAKING: Justice delayed for jailed schoolteacher Enoch Burke who refused to use “they” pronoun Judge gives Appeal Panel two weeks to prepare their excuses for a shambolic hearing in December that broke every rule in the book. Enoch Burke was dismissed from Wilson’s Hospital School after he refused to call a student by a new name and the “they” pronoun. He appealed his dismissal to the Disciplinary Appeal Panel (DAP). This three person panel contained a barrister, a teachers union vice president and a member of a school principals organisation. At the appeal hearing on the 13th of December, Enoch Burke was subjected to an Appeal Panel that blocked cross-examination of witnesses from the school, denied Enoch fair procedures and abruptly ended the hearing without closing submissions. After Enoch Burke raised serious concerns, the Appeal Panel (DAP) cobbled together an additional hearing for this Saturday the 10th of January 2026. However it is now clear the DAP appeal cannot proceed with the same panel members that denied Enoch Burke basic rights, one of whom is a former ASTI Vice-President who blatantly stated at the outset of the hearing “If I were instructed by my principal to call a child whatever, I have to implement that instruction, I don’t make the instruction”. Enoch Burke’s application for an injunction halting the Appeal Panel’s handling of his appeal was due to be heard by the High Court this morning at 11am. One minute before the proceedings were due to start, a solicitor for the Appeal Panel approached Enoch Burke and informed him that the so-called “re-convened” hearing on Saturday 10th January would be cancelled. The High Court granted the DAP time to file a replying affidavit. The matter is back in the High Court on Wednesday, 21st January 2026. It is a scandal that Enoch Burke has to fight to simply get a fair hearing of his appeal.

Enoch Burke

504,282 views • 6 months ago

BREAKING: ENOCH BURKE SAYS APPEAL OF HIS DISMISSAL SHOULD NOT PROCEED THIS SATURDAY Teacher Enoch Burke's appeal of his dismissal from Wilson's Hospital School is due to be heard by the Department of Education this Saturday, 13 December. Enoch Burke will speak in court tomorrow. He will argue that the Supreme Court must address the issue of conflicting Court of Appeal judgments in his case before the Department of Education hears his appeal. It is imperative in the interests of justice that this issue be resolved. A three-member division of the Court of Appeal today granted an order that Enoch Burke appear in person before them tomorrow at 2:30pm to apply that this hearing be postponed. There are conflicting judgments of the Court of Appeal regarding the critical question of why Enoch Burke was disciplined by Wilson's Hospital School. This is an extremely serious matter as the school’s Board of Management is relying heavily on a flawed judgment for Saturday's hearing. The Department of Education hearing should not proceed while this matter is unresolved. One judgment from 2023, written by Mr Justice John Edwards, contains the extraordinarily false assertion that "there is no evidence whatever" that Enoch Burke's suspension was because of his views on transgenderism or his refusal to comply with the principal's instruction to call a child "they". Mr Justice Edwards, on foot of this, stated that the constitutional rights to freedom of religion and freedom of conscience are "not engaged" i.e. not relevant to Enoch Burke's case. As stated previously, the Board of Management of Wilson’s Hospital School are relying heavily on this flawed judgment for Saturday's hearing. In a later Court of Appeal judgment in 2025, Ms Justice Mary Faherty ruled, on the contrary, that the principal's instruction is "a kernel" of the disciplinary proceedings against Enoch Burke. She stated: "In my view, any reasonable reader of the principal’s report would understand that the principal considered her overarching complaint against the appellant to fall under the heading of refusal to comply with a legitimate instruction resulting in serious consequences, as provided for in the Circular". Notwithstanding this, the second Court of Appeal did not correct the errors of the first Court of Appeal and was unwilling to state that the findings of Mr Justice John Edwards are wrong. Enoch Burke has appealed this issue to the Supreme Court. The Department of Education hearing should not proceed until the Supreme Court hears this case and makes its ruling. Justice must be done.

BREAKING: ENOCH BURKE SAYS APPEAL OF HIS DISMISSAL SHOULD NOT PROCEED THIS SATURDAY Teacher Enoch Burke's appeal of his dismissal from Wilson's Hospital School is due to be heard by the Department of Education this Saturday, 13 December. Enoch Burke will speak in court tomorrow. He will argue that the Supreme Court must address the issue of conflicting Court of Appeal judgments in his case before the Department of Education hears his appeal. It is imperative in the interests of justice that this issue be resolved. A three-member division of the Court of Appeal today granted an order that Enoch Burke appear in person before them tomorrow at 2:30pm to apply that this hearing be postponed. There are conflicting judgments of the Court of Appeal regarding the critical question of why Enoch Burke was disciplined by Wilson's Hospital School. This is an extremely serious matter as the school’s Board of Management is relying heavily on a flawed judgment for Saturday's hearing. The Department of Education hearing should not proceed while this matter is unresolved. One judgment from 2023, written by Mr Justice John Edwards, contains the extraordinarily false assertion that "there is no evidence whatever" that Enoch Burke's suspension was because of his views on transgenderism or his refusal to comply with the principal's instruction to call a child "they". Mr Justice Edwards, on foot of this, stated that the constitutional rights to freedom of religion and freedom of conscience are "not engaged" i.e. not relevant to Enoch Burke's case. As stated previously, the Board of Management of Wilson’s Hospital School are relying heavily on this flawed judgment for Saturday's hearing. In a later Court of Appeal judgment in 2025, Ms Justice Mary Faherty ruled, on the contrary, that the principal's instruction is "a kernel" of the disciplinary proceedings against Enoch Burke. She stated: "In my view, any reasonable reader of the principal’s report would understand that the principal considered her overarching complaint against the appellant to fall under the heading of refusal to comply with a legitimate instruction resulting in serious consequences, as provided for in the Circular". Notwithstanding this, the second Court of Appeal did not correct the errors of the first Court of Appeal and was unwilling to state that the findings of Mr Justice John Edwards are wrong. Enoch Burke has appealed this issue to the Supreme Court. The Department of Education hearing should not proceed until the Supreme Court hears this case and makes its ruling. Justice must be done.

Enoch Burke

149,178 views • 7 months ago

BREAKING: APPEAL PANEL MEMBERS RESIGN IN ENOCH BURKE CASE Members of the Disciplinary Appeal Panel tasked with hearing teacher Enoch Burke’s appeal have resigned after shocking revelations came to light in High Court proceedings as to how the Appeal Hearing was conducted. Enoch Burke was dismissed from Wilson’s Hospital School after he refused to call a student by a new name and the “they” pronoun. He has since spent over 580 days in Mountjoy Prison. At the Appeal Hearing on 13 December 2025, Enoch Burke was subjected to an Appeal Panel that blocked cross-examination of witnesses from the school, privately solicited documentation from the school in advance of the hearing and abruptly ended the hearing without closing submissions and during the attempted cross-examination of Principal Niamh McShane. One panel member, Geraldine O’Brien, stated at the outset of the hearing: “If I were instructed by my Principal to call a child whatever, I have to implement that instruction, I don’t make the instruction”. The Appeal Hearing took place over a single day on 13 December 2025 and concluded that evening. The result was expected within 10 school days of the hearing, as per Department of Education regulations. The High Court was informed by the Counsel for the school that the decision would be delivered by 9 January 2026. Enoch Burke raised serious concerns about the conduct of the Appeal Hearing and as a result, the Appeal Panel made a decision on 2 January 2026 to re-open the hearing. However, in a subsequent High Court affidavit, the Chairperson of the Appeal Panel Seán Ó Longáin swore on oath that the Appeal Panel had always intended to reconvene the hearing, and that the decision to re-open the hearing was in no way connected to the concerns Enoch Burke had raised. These were demonstrably false statements and were shown to be such by Enoch Burke. We believe that it is as a result of these lies, and other serious matters brought to light in these proceedings, that these resignations have been tendered.

BREAKING: APPEAL PANEL MEMBERS RESIGN IN ENOCH BURKE CASE Members of the Disciplinary Appeal Panel tasked with hearing teacher Enoch Burke’s appeal have resigned after shocking revelations came to light in High Court proceedings as to how the Appeal Hearing was conducted. Enoch Burke was dismissed from Wilson’s Hospital School after he refused to call a student by a new name and the “they” pronoun. He has since spent over 580 days in Mountjoy Prison. At the Appeal Hearing on 13 December 2025, Enoch Burke was subjected to an Appeal Panel that blocked cross-examination of witnesses from the school, privately solicited documentation from the school in advance of the hearing and abruptly ended the hearing without closing submissions and during the attempted cross-examination of Principal Niamh McShane. One panel member, Geraldine O’Brien, stated at the outset of the hearing: “If I were instructed by my Principal to call a child whatever, I have to implement that instruction, I don’t make the instruction”. The Appeal Hearing took place over a single day on 13 December 2025 and concluded that evening. The result was expected within 10 school days of the hearing, as per Department of Education regulations. The High Court was informed by the Counsel for the school that the decision would be delivered by 9 January 2026. Enoch Burke raised serious concerns about the conduct of the Appeal Hearing and as a result, the Appeal Panel made a decision on 2 January 2026 to re-open the hearing. However, in a subsequent High Court affidavit, the Chairperson of the Appeal Panel Seán Ó Longáin swore on oath that the Appeal Panel had always intended to reconvene the hearing, and that the decision to re-open the hearing was in no way connected to the concerns Enoch Burke had raised. These were demonstrably false statements and were shown to be such by Enoch Burke. We believe that it is as a result of these lies, and other serious matters brought to light in these proceedings, that these resignations have been tendered.

Enoch Burke

262,051 views • 5 months ago

STATEMENT FROM THE LABOUR PARTY Abure rejects Appeal Court decision, Heads to Supreme Court Excerpt of his statement. We have seen what transpired today at the Appeal Court and we want to say very clearly that the judgement is not acceptable to all of us in the Labour Party led by my humble self. I want to say very clearly that the judgement is against all known principles of law. The courts, the Supreme Courts and all courts in Nigeria have stated very clearly that the issues of leadership of a political party is an internal affairs of a political party. It is also not true and I disagree when people say that the tenure of this executive has expired. That is untrue and very unacceptable to us. Nigerians will recall that on the 27th of March 2024, we had a valid convention that was held in Nnewi and that convention is still valid and subsisting for 4 years. I want to say that the court today didn't look at that before arriving at the conclusion that the tenure has expired. I must also say clearly that the Umuahia meeting which produced the Caretaker Committee was also against the Labour Party constitution. It is only the National Chairman and National Secretary of a Political Party who has the power to convene any NEC meeting of any of sort. I want to say very clearly that we are going to appeal that decision. Today's decision of the Appeal Court is not acceptable to us and we reject it in its entirety. We have put our legal team together and we are going to file an appeal and move to the Supreme Court. Thank you and God bless you. Sign: Barrister Julius Abure National Chairman Labour Party. 21/04/2026

STATEMENT FROM THE LABOUR PARTY Abure rejects Appeal Court decision, Heads to Supreme Court Excerpt of his statement. We have seen what transpired today at the Appeal Court and we want to say very clearly that the judgement is not acceptable to all of us in the Labour Party led by my humble self. I want to say very clearly that the judgement is against all known principles of law. The courts, the Supreme Courts and all courts in Nigeria have stated very clearly that the issues of leadership of a political party is an internal affairs of a political party. It is also not true and I disagree when people say that the tenure of this executive has expired. That is untrue and very unacceptable to us. Nigerians will recall that on the 27th of March 2024, we had a valid convention that was held in Nnewi and that convention is still valid and subsisting for 4 years. I want to say that the court today didn't look at that before arriving at the conclusion that the tenure has expired. I must also say clearly that the Umuahia meeting which produced the Caretaker Committee was also against the Labour Party constitution. It is only the National Chairman and National Secretary of a Political Party who has the power to convene any NEC meeting of any of sort. I want to say very clearly that we are going to appeal that decision. Today's decision of the Appeal Court is not acceptable to us and we reject it in its entirety. We have put our legal team together and we are going to file an appeal and move to the Supreme Court. Thank you and God bless you. Sign: Barrister Julius Abure National Chairman Labour Party. 21/04/2026

LabourPartyNG

41,506 views • 3 months ago

WATCH: Former SABC COO and ACM Leader, Hlaudi Motsoeneng is a happy man after the Supreme of Appeal (SCA) rescinded its own decision on his application for leave to appeal the Multichoice-SABC archives commission payment deal. According to Motsoeneng, the SCA made the self-correction in another case where he was not part of the litigation. He adds that with this recent development, he has confidence in the country's judiciary, and that his pending case for leave to appeal before the Constitutional Court, would also be ruled fairly and close the chapter.

WATCH: Former SABC COO and ACM Leader, Hlaudi Motsoeneng is a happy man after the Supreme of Appeal (SCA) rescinded its own decision on his application for leave to appeal the Multichoice-SABC archives commission payment deal. According to Motsoeneng, the SCA made the self-correction in another case where he was not part of the litigation. He adds that with this recent development, he has confidence in the country's judiciary, and that his pending case for leave to appeal before the Constitutional Court, would also be ruled fairly and close the chapter.

Sihle Mavuso

73,550 views • 5 months ago

BREAKING: Enoch Burke seeks injunction over "shambolic" dismissal appeal hearing Teacher Enoch Burke was dismissed from his teaching position at Wilson's Hospital School after his refusal to use a new name and the "they" pronoun for a student. The hearing of Enoch Burke’s appeal on the 13th of December 2025 was shambolic and devoid of justice. The Chair of the Disciplinary Appeal Panel, Mr Seán O'Longáin, allowed no proper cross-examination. Little to no questions were asked by members of the appeal panel. The hearing was abruptly terminated while Enoch Burke was attempting to question former Principal Niamh McShane. The parties were told that the hearing was over and the result would be delivered in due course. One member of the Disciplinary Appeal Panel (DAP), Geraldine O’Brien, stated at the outset of the hearing: “If I were instructed by my principal to call a child whatever, I have to implement that instruction, I don’t make the instruction”. Ms O’Brien repeatedly refused to distance herself from the position of her organisation, the ASTI teachers union, which in 2022 stated “…certainly we would advise schools to use the pronoun that a child wishes to be used.” It also came to light during the hearing the DAP had privately sought extra documentation from the Board. In response, the Board had provided a new document, never seen before by Enoch Burke, which provided a new rationale for his purported dismissal. After serious objections from Enoch Burke, orally and in writing, the DAP admitted just last week that no reliance could be placed on this document. Last Friday, in a one-line letter to Mr Burke, the DAP stated that they were going to "reconvene" the hearing. This is merely an attempt to whitewash after grave concerns were raised by Enoch Burke. This Thursday 8th of January, in the High Court, Enoch Burke will seek an injunction halting delivery of the dismissal appeal result. He is entitled to a fair and unbiased hearing of his appeal. A new disciplinary appeal panel must be constituted.

BREAKING: Enoch Burke seeks injunction over "shambolic" dismissal appeal hearing Teacher Enoch Burke was dismissed from his teaching position at Wilson's Hospital School after his refusal to use a new name and the "they" pronoun for a student. The hearing of Enoch Burke’s appeal on the 13th of December 2025 was shambolic and devoid of justice. The Chair of the Disciplinary Appeal Panel, Mr Seán O'Longáin, allowed no proper cross-examination. Little to no questions were asked by members of the appeal panel. The hearing was abruptly terminated while Enoch Burke was attempting to question former Principal Niamh McShane. The parties were told that the hearing was over and the result would be delivered in due course. One member of the Disciplinary Appeal Panel (DAP), Geraldine O’Brien, stated at the outset of the hearing: “If I were instructed by my principal to call a child whatever, I have to implement that instruction, I don’t make the instruction”. Ms O’Brien repeatedly refused to distance herself from the position of her organisation, the ASTI teachers union, which in 2022 stated “…certainly we would advise schools to use the pronoun that a child wishes to be used.” It also came to light during the hearing the DAP had privately sought extra documentation from the Board. In response, the Board had provided a new document, never seen before by Enoch Burke, which provided a new rationale for his purported dismissal. After serious objections from Enoch Burke, orally and in writing, the DAP admitted just last week that no reliance could be placed on this document. Last Friday, in a one-line letter to Mr Burke, the DAP stated that they were going to "reconvene" the hearing. This is merely an attempt to whitewash after grave concerns were raised by Enoch Burke. This Thursday 8th of January, in the High Court, Enoch Burke will seek an injunction halting delivery of the dismissal appeal result. He is entitled to a fair and unbiased hearing of his appeal. A new disciplinary appeal panel must be constituted.

Enoch Burke

453,195 views • 6 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On AAP national convener Arvind Kejriwal's letter to Delhi High Court Chief Justice, Sacchin Puri, Advocate & Vice President Of Delhi High Court Bar Association says, "I believe that this is not correct. It is politicising the entire issue. The judgment has come. If you don't agree with the judgment, you have a remedy to appeal or revision or as the case may be. But to issue this kind of a letter in which you are acknowledging the fact that I have a right to appeal and without prejudice, I'm writing this to those rights, then you are taking the system on and saying today that you are bringing the prestige of the system down. It is not acceptable. There was no reason for such a letter to be posted in the public domain. You had a right which was right to appeal or revision. You should have exercised that. This is only scandalising the entire issue and trying to put pressure indirectly or directly on the judicial system."

#WATCH | Delhi: On AAP national convener Arvind Kejriwal's letter to Delhi High Court Chief Justice, Sacchin Puri, Advocate & Vice President Of Delhi High Court Bar Association says, "I believe that this is not correct. It is politicising the entire issue. The judgment has come. If you don't agree with the judgment, you have a remedy to appeal or revision or as the case may be. But to issue this kind of a letter in which you are acknowledging the fact that I have a right to appeal and without prejudice, I'm writing this to those rights, then you are taking the system on and saying today that you are bringing the prestige of the system down. It is not acceptable. There was no reason for such a letter to be posted in the public domain. You had a right which was right to appeal or revision. You should have exercised that. This is only scandalising the entire issue and trying to put pressure indirectly or directly on the judicial system."

ANI

46,793 views • 2 months ago

**Giggle v Tickle updates** • Tickle has applied to cross appeal, wanting the decision upgraded from “indirect discrimination” to “direct discrimination” + more $$$ in damages and $$$ in aggravated damages. • The Australian Human Rights sex discrimination Commissioner has once again applied to intervene. They intervened as amicus curiae in Tickle v Giggle and interpreted the law to favor gender identity over sex/legal sex over biological sex. • The Australian Christian Lobby has applied to intervene on the side of sex based rights. • The case management hearing is scheduled for February 12 at the Federal Court in Sydney. • It is likely that the appeal will be heard in August, 2025. This appeal is to the full Federal Court. That means 3 Federal Court judges not 1. Due to the cross appeal, the hearing is likely to go for 3-4 days rather than the usual 1 in an appeal. • The reason the Giggle appeal is to the full Federal Court and not the High Court is because the Tickle v Giggle decision got both facts about the case & facts about the law wrong. So it remains a Federal Court matter. • After a full Federal Court appeal decision, the side who didn’t get the decision in their favor can apply to go to the High Court. As I have said from the very beginning, I am willing to do that if that is what is necessary. • The Giggle legal team is Stuart Wood AM KC, Bridie Nolan, Anca Costin and Katherine Deves. • The next updates will be after the case management hearing & will address whether the cross appeal & interveners were permitted. • As always, thank you everyone for the endless support. It is invaluable to me. This has been a very long & stressful process for 3 years and it’s not over yet. Ultimately, I am very optimistic. In part because I know I am right - men are not women - but also because it is clear that the global capture of gender ideology is falling. • For more information & donations, please visit 🩷

Giggle v Tickle updates • Tickle has applied to cross appeal, wanting the decision upgraded from “indirect discrimination” to “direct discrimination” + more $$$ in damages and $$$ in aggravated damages. • The Australian Human Rights sex discrimination Commissioner has once again applied to intervene. They intervened as amicus curiae in Tickle v Giggle and interpreted the law to favor gender identity over sex/legal sex over biological sex. • The Australian Christian Lobby has applied to intervene on the side of sex based rights. • The case management hearing is scheduled for February 12 at the Federal Court in Sydney. • It is likely that the appeal will be heard in August, 2025. This appeal is to the full Federal Court. That means 3 Federal Court judges not 1. Due to the cross appeal, the hearing is likely to go for 3-4 days rather than the usual 1 in an appeal. • The reason the Giggle appeal is to the full Federal Court and not the High Court is because the Tickle v Giggle decision got both facts about the case & facts about the law wrong. So it remains a Federal Court matter. • After a full Federal Court appeal decision, the side who didn’t get the decision in their favor can apply to go to the High Court. As I have said from the very beginning, I am willing to do that if that is what is necessary. • The Giggle legal team is Stuart Wood AM KC, Bridie Nolan, Anca Costin and Katherine Deves. • The next updates will be after the case management hearing & will address whether the cross appeal & interveners were permitted. • As always, thank you everyone for the endless support. It is invaluable to me. This has been a very long & stressful process for 3 years and it’s not over yet. Ultimately, I am very optimistic. In part because I know I am right - men are not women - but also because it is clear that the global capture of gender ideology is falling. • For more information & donations, please visit 🩷

Sall Grover

1,641,421 views • 1 year ago

BREAKING: ENOCH BURKE FINED €225,000 AFTER REFUSING TO BOW TO TRANSGENDERISM Teacher Enoch Burke refused to endorse transgenderism in his school. Today he was fined almost a quarter of a million euros by the Irish Courts. Enoch Burke won his Court of Appeal case last July against the make-up of the Disciplinary Appeal Panel appointed to hear the appeal of his dismissal from Wilson’s Hospital School. The panel had included Kieran Christie, the General Secretary of the ASTI and promoter of transgenderism. There is a major discrepancy between the recent Court of Appeal judgment (which ordered the removal of Kieran Christie) and the behaviour of the High Court today in continuing to uphold the lawfulness of Enoch Burke’s suspension. The Court of Appeal ruled that the principal’s “overarching complaint” against Enoch Burke was his refusal to comply with her instruction to address a child by a new name and the “they” pronoun. The Court of Appeal further ruled that “indisputably” the disciplinary authorities must assess the legitimacy of that instruction. The High Court has never assessed whether the principal’s instruction was legitimate. It has repeatedly refused to acknowledge the true basis for the disciplinary action against Enoch Burke and has never determined Enoch Burke’s claim that there has been a breach of his constitutional rights. Notwithstanding, it has purported to uphold the lawfulness of Enoch Burke’s suspension. In all of these matters the High Court is wholly at odds with the recent judgment of the Court of Appeal. Today Judge David Nolan refused to have regard to the findings of the Court of Appeal and threatened to find members of the Burke family in contempt of court for raising the issue. Judge David Nolan refused to allow Enoch Burke’s affidavit or submissions to be opened or addressed in court. This behaviour is extremely concerning. Judge David Nolan stated today he does not want to put Enoch Burke back in prison. In the same breath he has accused Enoch Burke of having “a perverted sense of justice”. The truth is that Judge David Nolan knows that the public is appalled and outraged at the perverted actions of the Irish Courts over the past three years as Enoch Burke has been repeatedly denied his constitutional rights, the very rights which Judge David Nolan and others have solemnly vowed to uphold. All of this would never have happened but for the silence of the Church. The Church has betrayed Christ and been silent. For the last three years Enoch Burke has been made a pariah and a scapegoat for refusing to affirm transgenderism. The ethos of Wilson’s Hospital School, a Church of Ireland school, is Christian. Its teaching is “God made them male and female”. ‘Bishop’ Patricia ‘Judas’ Storey, the Patron of Wilson’s Hospital School, has betrayed this ethos, as has Archbishop John ‘Judas’ McDowell. Enoch Burke stood up for the ethos of Wilson’s Hospital School in 2022 when Principal Niamh McShane instructed all students and staff to use the ‘they’ pronoun for a male student. He objected to this demand. Storey and McDowell were silent and agreed with corrupt judges who upheld Enoch Burke’s unlawful suspension. When you see these people in their pulpits, making their fair speeches, think of Enoch Burke - locked up for over 500 days, stripped of his salary and denied his constitutional rights. Do not be deceived. These so-called Church leaders are Judases who have betrayed Christ. Their silence has been the prime cause of this whole situation.

BREAKING: ENOCH BURKE FINED €225,000 AFTER REFUSING TO BOW TO TRANSGENDERISM Teacher Enoch Burke refused to endorse transgenderism in his school. Today he was fined almost a quarter of a million euros by the Irish Courts. Enoch Burke won his Court of Appeal case last July against the make-up of the Disciplinary Appeal Panel appointed to hear the appeal of his dismissal from Wilson’s Hospital School. The panel had included Kieran Christie, the General Secretary of the ASTI and promoter of transgenderism. There is a major discrepancy between the recent Court of Appeal judgment (which ordered the removal of Kieran Christie) and the behaviour of the High Court today in continuing to uphold the lawfulness of Enoch Burke’s suspension. The Court of Appeal ruled that the principal’s “overarching complaint” against Enoch Burke was his refusal to comply with her instruction to address a child by a new name and the “they” pronoun. The Court of Appeal further ruled that “indisputably” the disciplinary authorities must assess the legitimacy of that instruction. The High Court has never assessed whether the principal’s instruction was legitimate. It has repeatedly refused to acknowledge the true basis for the disciplinary action against Enoch Burke and has never determined Enoch Burke’s claim that there has been a breach of his constitutional rights. Notwithstanding, it has purported to uphold the lawfulness of Enoch Burke’s suspension. In all of these matters the High Court is wholly at odds with the recent judgment of the Court of Appeal. Today Judge David Nolan refused to have regard to the findings of the Court of Appeal and threatened to find members of the Burke family in contempt of court for raising the issue. Judge David Nolan refused to allow Enoch Burke’s affidavit or submissions to be opened or addressed in court. This behaviour is extremely concerning. Judge David Nolan stated today he does not want to put Enoch Burke back in prison. In the same breath he has accused Enoch Burke of having “a perverted sense of justice”. The truth is that Judge David Nolan knows that the public is appalled and outraged at the perverted actions of the Irish Courts over the past three years as Enoch Burke has been repeatedly denied his constitutional rights, the very rights which Judge David Nolan and others have solemnly vowed to uphold. All of this would never have happened but for the silence of the Church. The Church has betrayed Christ and been silent. For the last three years Enoch Burke has been made a pariah and a scapegoat for refusing to affirm transgenderism. The ethos of Wilson’s Hospital School, a Church of Ireland school, is Christian. Its teaching is “God made them male and female”. ‘Bishop’ Patricia ‘Judas’ Storey, the Patron of Wilson’s Hospital School, has betrayed this ethos, as has Archbishop John ‘Judas’ McDowell. Enoch Burke stood up for the ethos of Wilson’s Hospital School in 2022 when Principal Niamh McShane instructed all students and staff to use the ‘they’ pronoun for a male student. He objected to this demand. Storey and McDowell were silent and agreed with corrupt judges who upheld Enoch Burke’s unlawful suspension. When you see these people in their pulpits, making their fair speeches, think of Enoch Burke - locked up for over 500 days, stripped of his salary and denied his constitutional rights. Do not be deceived. These so-called Church leaders are Judases who have betrayed Christ. Their silence has been the prime cause of this whole situation.

Enoch Burke

1,780,408 views • 10 months ago

Supreme Court Dismisses David Mark's Application for Stay of Execution The Supreme Court has dismissed an application for stay of execution of an Appeal Court ruling that led to the decision of electoral body, INEC to derecognize the Senator David Mark leadership of the Action Democratic Congress, ADC. This dismissal by the Apex Court on Tuesday followed the withdrawal of the application by senator Mark's counsel Jibril Okutekpa, SAN. Okutekpa had informed the five-member apex court panel headed by Justice Lawal Garba that INEC's interpretation of the Court of Appeal decision on March 12 has made the party 'leaderless.' He says the 'injunctive order' for the aggrieved parties to maintain 'status quo antebellum' is the reason for the current leadership vacuum in the ADC. He prayed the court for urgent action in view of the time constraints in the lead up to next year's crucial polls. In its intervention, the apex court gave procedural directions to fast-track the process, including abridging time for filing briefs and responses, due to the time-sensitive nature of the matter, ahead of the 2027 elections. It scheduled the substantive hearing of the appeal for Tuesday, April 22, 2026. The original dispute stems from a suit by Nafiu-Bala Gombe (former Deputy National Chairman), who is challenging the legitimacy of Mark and Aregbesola’s leadership. INEC has withheld recognition of either faction pending court resolution of the leadership tussle. Gombe sought, among other things, to restrain Mark (as National Chairman), Rauf Aregbesola (as National Secretary), and others from parading as ADC leaders, and to stop INEC from recognizing them. On or around April 1, 2026, INEC removed Mark and Aregbesola's names from its portal as National Chairman and Secretary, citing the Appeal Court's "status quo" order and related correspondence.

Supreme Court Dismisses David Mark's Application for Stay of Execution The Supreme Court has dismissed an application for stay of execution of an Appeal Court ruling that led to the decision of electoral body, INEC to derecognize the Senator David Mark leadership of the Action Democratic Congress, ADC. This dismissal by the Apex Court on Tuesday followed the withdrawal of the application by senator Mark's counsel Jibril Okutekpa, SAN. Okutekpa had informed the five-member apex court panel headed by Justice Lawal Garba that INEC's interpretation of the Court of Appeal decision on March 12 has made the party 'leaderless.' He says the 'injunctive order' for the aggrieved parties to maintain 'status quo antebellum' is the reason for the current leadership vacuum in the ADC. He prayed the court for urgent action in view of the time constraints in the lead up to next year's crucial polls. In its intervention, the apex court gave procedural directions to fast-track the process, including abridging time for filing briefs and responses, due to the time-sensitive nature of the matter, ahead of the 2027 elections. It scheduled the substantive hearing of the appeal for Tuesday, April 22, 2026. The original dispute stems from a suit by Nafiu-Bala Gombe (former Deputy National Chairman), who is challenging the legitimacy of Mark and Aregbesola’s leadership. INEC has withheld recognition of either faction pending court resolution of the leadership tussle. Gombe sought, among other things, to restrain Mark (as National Chairman), Rauf Aregbesola (as National Secretary), and others from parading as ADC leaders, and to stop INEC from recognizing them. On or around April 1, 2026, INEC removed Mark and Aregbesola's names from its portal as National Chairman and Secretary, citing the Appeal Court's "status quo" order and related correspondence.

ARISE NEWS

247,021 views • 3 months ago

VIDEO | Delhi: On a letter sent to the CJI against the former Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal over contempt of court, Advocate Dr. Monika Sharma says, “See, we wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of India stating the following. We stated that a very unfortunate incident has happened. Now, what is the incident? The incident is that a person who got discharged from the CBI court, good for him, when the CBI challenged the case in the High Court and certain interim directions were passed by the High Court, he said, ‘No, no, no, I don’t like those interim directions.’ So he neither appealed against that order nor filed a review or revision, but he said, ‘Change the judge, change the bench, change the court.’ And he came out openly in public about it. It was all over the media that he was saying that this judge should not hear my case and some other judge should hear my case. Now, litigants cannot decide which judge will hear their case. It is the Chief Justice of the respective High Court who decides the roster, which judge will hear civil matters and which judge will hear criminal matters. Now here he says, ‘No, no, you change the judge.’ So the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court says, ‘No, there is no reason to change the judge. We are not changing the judge.’ He goes to the Supreme Court and files a petition saying, ‘Change the judge.’ Now you see, this is a very, very dangerous trend, not only for the judicial system but for our democracy. Now here, if you don’t like the order, you’re not challenging the order, you’re challenging the judge. And that too, you’re publicly humiliating and embarrassing the judge, that is wrong. So the number of people who have signed this letter, they are former and present vice-chancellors, IPS officers, lawyers, senior advocates, bar members, the High Court Bar Association’s former president, secretary, everybody has signed this letter saying this is a wrong precedent. It undermines the status, it undermines the dignity of the judiciary. Judicial officers should be allowed to work without any political pressure, without any pressure tactics. This amounts to forum shopping and bench hunting. This should be discouraged, and this is criminal contempt of court because you are attributing motives to the judge. So we have requested the Chief Justice of India to suo motu initiate criminal contempt proceedings against this person."

VIDEO | Delhi: On a letter sent to the CJI against the former Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal over contempt of court, Advocate Dr. Monika Sharma says, “See, we wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of India stating the following. We stated that a very unfortunate incident has happened. Now, what is the incident? The incident is that a person who got discharged from the CBI court, good for him, when the CBI challenged the case in the High Court and certain interim directions were passed by the High Court, he said, ‘No, no, no, I don’t like those interim directions.’ So he neither appealed against that order nor filed a review or revision, but he said, ‘Change the judge, change the bench, change the court.’ And he came out openly in public about it. It was all over the media that he was saying that this judge should not hear my case and some other judge should hear my case. Now, litigants cannot decide which judge will hear their case. It is the Chief Justice of the respective High Court who decides the roster, which judge will hear civil matters and which judge will hear criminal matters. Now here he says, ‘No, no, you change the judge.’ So the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court says, ‘No, there is no reason to change the judge. We are not changing the judge.’ He goes to the Supreme Court and files a petition saying, ‘Change the judge.’ Now you see, this is a very, very dangerous trend, not only for the judicial system but for our democracy. Now here, if you don’t like the order, you’re not challenging the order, you’re challenging the judge. And that too, you’re publicly humiliating and embarrassing the judge, that is wrong. So the number of people who have signed this letter, they are former and present vice-chancellors, IPS officers, lawyers, senior advocates, bar members, the High Court Bar Association’s former president, secretary, everybody has signed this letter saying this is a wrong precedent. It undermines the status, it undermines the dignity of the judiciary. Judicial officers should be allowed to work without any political pressure, without any pressure tactics. This amounts to forum shopping and bench hunting. This should be discouraged, and this is criminal contempt of court because you are attributing motives to the judge. So we have requested the Chief Justice of India to suo motu initiate criminal contempt proceedings against this person."

Press Trust of India

99,583 views • 4 months ago

UPDATE ON TODAY’S PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA ON ONYENDU MAZI NNAMDI KANU’S CASE: Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s case was the first to be mentioned on the cause list at the Supreme Court today, and as usual, our erudite Lead Counsel – Prof. Mike Ozekhome was hands-on to deliver the argument on behalf of our defence team. All pending applications capable of affecting the expeditious hearing of the Appeal were disposed today. His Lordships, proceeded to grant only two weeks adjournment for the hearing of the substantive Appeal. Parties were directed to ensure that every process incidental to the Appeal is filed within a specified timeline given to parties, and the Appeal was consequently adjourned to the 11th day of May 2023 for Hearing. We shall keep Ezigbo UmuChineke abreast of every development as we progress. Thank you all and remain blessed. We move! Signed: Sir Ifeanyi Ejiofor Esq. (KSC) IPOB’s Lead Counsel 27th April 2023.

UPDATE ON TODAY’S PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA ON ONYENDU MAZI NNAMDI KANU’S CASE: Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s case was the first to be mentioned on the cause list at the Supreme Court today, and as usual, our erudite Lead Counsel – Prof. Mike Ozekhome was hands-on to deliver the argument on behalf of our defence team. All pending applications capable of affecting the expeditious hearing of the Appeal were disposed today. His Lordships, proceeded to grant only two weeks adjournment for the hearing of the substantive Appeal. Parties were directed to ensure that every process incidental to the Appeal is filed within a specified timeline given to parties, and the Appeal was consequently adjourned to the 11th day of May 2023 for Hearing. We shall keep Ezigbo UmuChineke abreast of every development as we progress. Thank you all and remain blessed. We move! Signed: Sir Ifeanyi Ejiofor Esq. (KSC) IPOB’s Lead Counsel 27th April 2023.

bar ifeanyi ejiofor

100,793 views • 3 years ago

BREAKING: NO JUSTICE IN HIGH COURT AS ENOCH BURKE RETURNED TO PRISON It is now two weeks since the shock resignations of two members of the Disciplinary Appeal Panel (DAP) appointed to hear Enoch Burke’s appeal. Sean Ó Longáin and Jack Cleary resigned after Enoch Burke brought High Court proceedings revealing the panel’s appalling breaches of fair procedures. In the December appeal Enoch Burke was subjected to a panel that blocked cross-examination of witnesses from the school, privately solicited documentation from the school in advance of the hearing and abruptly ended the hearing without closing submissions and during the attempted cross-examination of Principal Niamh McShane. Today, in a naked and appalling abuse of power, Mr Justice Brian Cregan struck out these High Court proceedings against the DAP. He did this even though Geraldine O’Brien, a panel member and nominee from the Association of Secondary Teachers in Ireland (ASTI), has not resigned and remains on the DAP. Enoch Burke was dismissed from Wilson’s Hospital School after he refused to call a student by a new name and the “they” pronoun. He has since spent almost 600 days in Mountjoy Prison. The DAP was supposed to be the "embodiment" of fair procedures and natural justice, where "independent" and "impartial" decisionmakers would hear Enoch's appeal. Instead, it turned out to be an absolute caricature of justice where almost every rule of fair procedure was broken. Geraldine O'Brien's organisation, the ASTI, advises schools to "use the pronoun that a child wishes to be used". Ms O'Brien herself stated at the outset of the DAP hearing last December: “If I were instructed by my Principal to call a child whatever, I have to implement that instruction, I don’t make the instruction”. At the last Court hearing on 4 February, Judge Cregan admitted that while Geraldine O'Brien remained on the panel, Enoch Burke's case was not moot. Today - notwithstanding the fact that Ms O'Brien has not resigned and still sits on the DAP - Judge Cregan had a totally different view. The striking out of these proceedings is an abuse of power and wholly unlawful. Official Department of Education rules governing disciplinary processes are clear that an appointee to the DAP remains on the panel unless or until he or she resigns. Judge Cregan has gifted an illegal escape route to Geraldine O'Brien - not provided anywhere in the Department of Education rules - for her to simply "disappear" without tendering her resignation and therefore without any public accountability for her actions. Before the other two members of the DAP resigned two weeks ago, one of them — the Chairperson, Seán Ó Longáin — lied in an affidavit to the court. Today Enoch Burke made a formal application to Judge Cregan to refer this matter of alleged perjury to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). The judge did not make any ruling on this application or even acknowledge it. Today's proceedings are a mockery of justice by a judge who is desperate to wrap up Enoch Burke's case in any old way regardless of what the law says. He has told the school to get a new DAP panel up and running urgently. This would be the third Disciplinary Appeal Panel. Enoch Burke has been denied his constitutional rights from the start by the Courts who are now trying to pass it on to the DAP which is not working out. Sin and treachery can’t be hidden easily.

BREAKING: NO JUSTICE IN HIGH COURT AS ENOCH BURKE RETURNED TO PRISON It is now two weeks since the shock resignations of two members of the Disciplinary Appeal Panel (DAP) appointed to hear Enoch Burke’s appeal. Sean Ó Longáin and Jack Cleary resigned after Enoch Burke brought High Court proceedings revealing the panel’s appalling breaches of fair procedures. In the December appeal Enoch Burke was subjected to a panel that blocked cross-examination of witnesses from the school, privately solicited documentation from the school in advance of the hearing and abruptly ended the hearing without closing submissions and during the attempted cross-examination of Principal Niamh McShane. Today, in a naked and appalling abuse of power, Mr Justice Brian Cregan struck out these High Court proceedings against the DAP. He did this even though Geraldine O’Brien, a panel member and nominee from the Association of Secondary Teachers in Ireland (ASTI), has not resigned and remains on the DAP. Enoch Burke was dismissed from Wilson’s Hospital School after he refused to call a student by a new name and the “they” pronoun. He has since spent almost 600 days in Mountjoy Prison. The DAP was supposed to be the "embodiment" of fair procedures and natural justice, where "independent" and "impartial" decisionmakers would hear Enoch's appeal. Instead, it turned out to be an absolute caricature of justice where almost every rule of fair procedure was broken. Geraldine O'Brien's organisation, the ASTI, advises schools to "use the pronoun that a child wishes to be used". Ms O'Brien herself stated at the outset of the DAP hearing last December: “If I were instructed by my Principal to call a child whatever, I have to implement that instruction, I don’t make the instruction”. At the last Court hearing on 4 February, Judge Cregan admitted that while Geraldine O'Brien remained on the panel, Enoch Burke's case was not moot. Today - notwithstanding the fact that Ms O'Brien has not resigned and still sits on the DAP - Judge Cregan had a totally different view. The striking out of these proceedings is an abuse of power and wholly unlawful. Official Department of Education rules governing disciplinary processes are clear that an appointee to the DAP remains on the panel unless or until he or she resigns. Judge Cregan has gifted an illegal escape route to Geraldine O'Brien - not provided anywhere in the Department of Education rules - for her to simply "disappear" without tendering her resignation and therefore without any public accountability for her actions. Before the other two members of the DAP resigned two weeks ago, one of them — the Chairperson, Seán Ó Longáin — lied in an affidavit to the court. Today Enoch Burke made a formal application to Judge Cregan to refer this matter of alleged perjury to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). The judge did not make any ruling on this application or even acknowledge it. Today's proceedings are a mockery of justice by a judge who is desperate to wrap up Enoch Burke's case in any old way regardless of what the law says. He has told the school to get a new DAP panel up and running urgently. This would be the third Disciplinary Appeal Panel. Enoch Burke has been denied his constitutional rights from the start by the Courts who are now trying to pass it on to the DAP which is not working out. Sin and treachery can’t be hidden easily.

Enoch Burke

283,378 views • 5 months ago

Charles Kanjama: It is a groundbreaking ruling because it is breaking new ground. It is a ruling that, in my view, takes the country a bit backwards on issues of public participation. Personally, I am a bit disappointed on that issue, and I feel that on some of the other aspects that were dealt with by the court, there was a tendency to disregard part of the evidence that was there to challenge. I feel that this groundbreaking judgment of the court had a number of missteps that need to be addressed when the matter goes to the court of appeal #CitizenMondayReport

Charles Kanjama: It is a groundbreaking ruling because it is breaking new ground. It is a ruling that, in my view, takes the country a bit backwards on issues of public participation. Personally, I am a bit disappointed on that issue, and I feel that on some of the other aspects that were dealt with by the court, there was a tendency to disregard part of the evidence that was there to challenge. I feel that this groundbreaking judgment of the court had a number of missteps that need to be addressed when the matter goes to the court of appeal #CitizenMondayReport

Citizen TV Kenya

14,632 views • 1 month ago

Today marks 493 days since #Israeli and #Serbian citizen Alon Ohel, whose family is originally from #Serbia, has been imprisoned and chained in a dungeon at the bottom of a tunnel in Gaza. We demand, appeal and plead that #Alon be released without delay and allowed to return to his mother, father, brothers and sisters. When he was captured, Alon was not a member of the armed forces. He was a pianist who was on his way to a music festival with his peers and friends. Two weeks later, he was supposed to visit his family in Serbia, but unfortunately he never got there. For 493 days, he did not see the sun or his loved ones. The people who were imprisoned with him are physically reduced to a shadow of who they were before the imprisonment, and they tell harrowing stories about the conditions in which they were held for more than a year. Today, on this day, Alon would have turned 24 years old as a free person. However, this is how he spends his birthday instead — chained, without food, without medical care, even though he is in captivity and seriously wounded. I appeal to all those who can help, I appeal to those who are holding Alon, I appeal to the entire international public to do everything possible to ensure that this young man is released, that he returns to his family and that international humanitarian law — humanity in this case — prevails. Serbia stands with Alon, with the families of the abductees, with all who suffered in this tragic conflict, and we are pleading for his #freedom.🎗️ #BringAlonHome #BringThemHomeNow #UntilTheLastHostage United Nations Bring Them Home Now

Today marks 493 days since #Israeli and #Serbian citizen Alon Ohel, whose family is originally from #Serbia, has been imprisoned and chained in a dungeon at the bottom of a tunnel in Gaza. We demand, appeal and plead that #Alon be released without delay and allowed to return to his mother, father, brothers and sisters. When he was captured, Alon was not a member of the armed forces. He was a pianist who was on his way to a music festival with his peers and friends. Two weeks later, he was supposed to visit his family in Serbia, but unfortunately he never got there. For 493 days, he did not see the sun or his loved ones. The people who were imprisoned with him are physically reduced to a shadow of who they were before the imprisonment, and they tell harrowing stories about the conditions in which they were held for more than a year. Today, on this day, Alon would have turned 24 years old as a free person. However, this is how he spends his birthday instead — chained, without food, without medical care, even though he is in captivity and seriously wounded. I appeal to all those who can help, I appeal to those who are holding Alon, I appeal to the entire international public to do everything possible to ensure that this young man is released, that he returns to his family and that international humanitarian law — humanity in this case — prevails. Serbia stands with Alon, with the families of the abductees, with all who suffered in this tragic conflict, and we are pleading for his #freedom.🎗️ #BringAlonHome #BringThemHomeNow #UntilTheLastHostage United Nations Bring Them Home Now

Марко Ђурић

16,936 views • 1 year ago

Please stop this! Aside from the fact that Justice Omotosho James is a Christian, the first presiding judge at the Court of Appeal that ruled to set Nnamdi Kanu Free was a Yoruba woman (Justice Oludotun Adebola Adefope-okojie). Again, on the 15th of December, 2023, the Supreme Court pverturned this judgement. The only dissenting voice among the 5 justices that agreed with Justice Adefope of the Appeal Court was Justice Helen Moronkeji Ogunwumiju (another Yoruba woman). We can peacefully and tactfully agitate for the release of MNK without making inflammatory statements or resulting to ethnic or religious bigotry!

Please stop this! Aside from the fact that Justice Omotosho James is a Christian, the first presiding judge at the Court of Appeal that ruled to set Nnamdi Kanu Free was a Yoruba woman (Justice Oludotun Adebola Adefope-okojie). Again, on the 15th of December, 2023, the Supreme Court pverturned this judgement. The only dissenting voice among the 5 justices that agreed with Justice Adefope of the Appeal Court was Justice Helen Moronkeji Ogunwumiju (another Yoruba woman). We can peacefully and tactfully agitate for the release of MNK without making inflammatory statements or resulting to ethnic or religious bigotry!

Olawale A. Bakare

409,629 views • 8 months ago

Nnamdi Kanu is trending because his trial has been adjourned indefinitely. Barely 48hrs after he said no one should beg Tinubu, on his behalf. Because agitating Biafra is not a crime. He rejected the adjournment by Justice Binta Nyako. Lectured the court, alleged Nyako wants to exchange his head. September 24th, 2024, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu rejected and openly accused Justice Binta Nyako of being an unprofessional, bias Justice who actively disobeys the rule of law. Then asked her to remove herself from his trial. She admitted and transferred his case file to Justice Tosho. Justice Tosho rejected it and sent it back to Justice Nyako. MNK insisted he isn’t confident in Justice Nyako handling his case. That, if there is no one willing to handle his case in Abuja. Then, his trial should be moved to the South East. Since his alleged offense of “Treason” affects the South East, not the North. Then, they should be well equipped to handle the trial accordingly. Today in court, Justice Nyako appeared again and was ready to proceed with the case at the Federal High Court Abuja. As prosecution was looking to begin, MNK’s lawyer opposed, saying they are not here for trial. Justice Nyako then said, she initially recused herself from the case, but she was assigned back by the Chief Judge. That, they’d need to file a reassignment motion. As Kanu’s lawyers and the prosecution were arguing the need for such. Nnamdi Kanu demanded to speak. He said, he’s only in court out of respect. That, Nyako no longer has jurisdiction over his case. And he doesn’t understand why they always turn the law upside down when it comes to his case. He argued that, since Nyako had officially recused herself from his case. Then, the Chief Judge can’t impose, instead appeal. Kanu insisted Nyako is unprofessional and bias. Kanu said “If the Chief Judge disagrees, he should appeal the decision. You cannot preside over this case, not now, not today, not ever. You stand recused and you must leave my case. I don’t need you in my case. You are biased. Tell the Chief Judge that Nnamdi Kanu said so. This is not a court of law. This is a shrine to injustice and i will not subject myself to it”. After his submission, the prosecutor still wanted the court to go ahead with trial. MNK interrupted saying “Because of money they are paying you from the AGF’s office, a grown-up man like you is here supporting evil. The rule of law says you should go on appeal. The same Chief Judge, writing this stupid memo, I have recused him before. He sat on appeal, I took him to NJC and recused him. Why is he insisting on this one? He wants to embarrass your lordship by asking her to sit on this case.” Then Justice Nyako, decided Adjourn the case indefinitely due to the situation of things. Kanu again; “You have no jurisdiction to adjourn anything. None whatsoever. You cannot make an order without jurisdiction. The memo from the Chief Judge cannot confer jurisdiction upon you” Kanu insists they deliberately ignore the law due to their bias against him. That him agitating for Biafra is his right, that somehow they’ve changed his charge from treason to terrorism. He remains defiant, against Justice Nyako handling his trial. He alleged that Justice Nyako has reached some sort of agreement to give his head in exchange for the freedom of her husband and son, who are facing a criminal case. Hinting that Nyako never truely left the case. Basically, he just wants the court to obey the Nigerian constitution. He has been in detention since 2021. But Nigerians fear it has become political and he may need to be submissive, otherwise his pride will keep him incarcerated indefinitely. • Pay for what you use. Get detailed analytics on your energy consumption • water, electricity & gas. Inquire now: Vendr Utilities || iOS • Web • Android || info@vendr.ng ||

Nnamdi Kanu is trending because his trial has been adjourned indefinitely. Barely 48hrs after he said no one should beg Tinubu, on his behalf. Because agitating Biafra is not a crime. He rejected the adjournment by Justice Binta Nyako. Lectured the court, alleged Nyako wants to exchange his head. September 24th, 2024, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu rejected and openly accused Justice Binta Nyako of being an unprofessional, bias Justice who actively disobeys the rule of law. Then asked her to remove herself from his trial. She admitted and transferred his case file to Justice Tosho. Justice Tosho rejected it and sent it back to Justice Nyako. MNK insisted he isn’t confident in Justice Nyako handling his case. That, if there is no one willing to handle his case in Abuja. Then, his trial should be moved to the South East. Since his alleged offense of “Treason” affects the South East, not the North. Then, they should be well equipped to handle the trial accordingly. Today in court, Justice Nyako appeared again and was ready to proceed with the case at the Federal High Court Abuja. As prosecution was looking to begin, MNK’s lawyer opposed, saying they are not here for trial. Justice Nyako then said, she initially recused herself from the case, but she was assigned back by the Chief Judge. That, they’d need to file a reassignment motion. As Kanu’s lawyers and the prosecution were arguing the need for such. Nnamdi Kanu demanded to speak. He said, he’s only in court out of respect. That, Nyako no longer has jurisdiction over his case. And he doesn’t understand why they always turn the law upside down when it comes to his case. He argued that, since Nyako had officially recused herself from his case. Then, the Chief Judge can’t impose, instead appeal. Kanu insisted Nyako is unprofessional and bias. Kanu said “If the Chief Judge disagrees, he should appeal the decision. You cannot preside over this case, not now, not today, not ever. You stand recused and you must leave my case. I don’t need you in my case. You are biased. Tell the Chief Judge that Nnamdi Kanu said so. This is not a court of law. This is a shrine to injustice and i will not subject myself to it”. After his submission, the prosecutor still wanted the court to go ahead with trial. MNK interrupted saying “Because of money they are paying you from the AGF’s office, a grown-up man like you is here supporting evil. The rule of law says you should go on appeal. The same Chief Judge, writing this stupid memo, I have recused him before. He sat on appeal, I took him to NJC and recused him. Why is he insisting on this one? He wants to embarrass your lordship by asking her to sit on this case.” Then Justice Nyako, decided Adjourn the case indefinitely due to the situation of things. Kanu again; “You have no jurisdiction to adjourn anything. None whatsoever. You cannot make an order without jurisdiction. The memo from the Chief Judge cannot confer jurisdiction upon you” Kanu insists they deliberately ignore the law due to their bias against him. That him agitating for Biafra is his right, that somehow they’ve changed his charge from treason to terrorism. He remains defiant, against Justice Nyako handling his trial. He alleged that Justice Nyako has reached some sort of agreement to give his head in exchange for the freedom of her husband and son, who are facing a criminal case. Hinting that Nyako never truely left the case. Basically, he just wants the court to obey the Nigerian constitution. He has been in detention since 2021. But Nigerians fear it has become political and he may need to be submissive, otherwise his pride will keep him incarcerated indefinitely. • Pay for what you use. Get detailed analytics on your energy consumption • water, electricity & gas. Inquire now: Vendr Utilities || iOS • Web • Android || [email protected] ||

Trending Explained

103,162 views • 1 year ago