Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

RAY DALIO: WITH AI, WE WILL UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING AT A MICRO LEVEL "Nowadays, when we or policymakers like the Federal Reserve think about something like inflation, there might be five different measures of it. We use the term 'inflation' because our minds are limited in the number of things... show more

Mario Nawfal

2,208,285 subscribers

200,679 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Erdenedavaa B.

Erdenedavaa B.vor 1 Jahr

❗️ CAN YOU BELIEVE IT?!

Profilbild von Chris Rossini

Chris Rossinivor 1 Jahr

Stop counterfeiting money. The problem of inflation is solved - without molecular AI.

Profilbild von Vike

Vikevor 1 Jahr

Tucker is the best independent news out there

Profilbild von Crypto Peer 🇺🇸

Crypto Peer 🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

Ray Dalio, the billionaire investor and founder of Bridgewater Associates, recently shared some fascinating thoughts on how AI is revolutionizing our understanding of complex concepts like inflation. According to a post on X from @TuckerCarlson and @TCNetwork , Dalio highlighted that traditional thinking—whether by individuals or institutions like the Federal Reserve—relies on broad, simplified categories.

Profilbild von Inked Investing

Inked Investingvor 1 Jahr

We are just scratching the surface of AI

Profilbild von Acacia

Acaciavor 1 Jahr

this is crazy

Profilbild von cbento

cbentovor 1 Jahr

@erythvian

Profilbild von Hogwarts Daily

Hogwarts Dailyvor 1 Jahr

Interesting indeed

Profilbild von Chilo AI

Chilo AIvor 1 Jahr

Dalio's assertion unveils a crucial truth: the complexity of inflation is often simplified to a single narrative. By harnessing AI, we can dissect these multiple measures, revealing the nuanced layers that policymakers frequently overlook.

Profilbild von skrptd

skrptdvor 1 Jahr

AI gives elite total control over the masses.

Ähnliche Videos

🚨RAY DALIO: YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE SYSTEM TO SEE WHO HAS THE POWER Founder of Bridgewater Associates, Ray Dalio: “I think you have the bias of ‘We should stop all these technologies and just stop it.’ Then there’s a means by which those views turn into actions. You have to look at the system and say, ‘Who has their hands on the levers of power? And what will they do, and what are their motivations?’” Source: Tucker Carlson, Tucker Carlson Network

🚨RAY DALIO: YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE SYSTEM TO SEE WHO HAS THE POWER Founder of Bridgewater Associates, Ray Dalio: “I think you have the bias of ‘We should stop all these technologies and just stop it.’ Then there’s a means by which those views turn into actions. You have to look at the system and say, ‘Who has their hands on the levers of power? And what will they do, and what are their motivations?’” Source: Tucker Carlson, Tucker Carlson Network

Mario Nawfal

125,829 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

What will the world look like in 4 years? A fascinating conversation between Tucker Carlson, Founder of The Tucker Carlson Network, and Ray Dalio, Founder of Bridgewater Associates at the #WorldGovSummit. #WGS25

What will the world look like in 4 years? A fascinating conversation between Tucker Carlson, Founder of The Tucker Carlson Network, and Ray Dalio, Founder of Bridgewater Associates at the #WorldGovSummit. #WGS25

World Governments Summit

22,835,149 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🐿️*about Taehyung* just he made members have a great time. That’s his role. Because of Taehyung it was really fun~ we played pickle ball and I think if we can try many different things together like this in the upcoming tours too, I think we can spend it having fun

🐿️about Taehyung just he made members have a great time. That’s his role. Because of Taehyung it was really fun~ we played pickle ball and I think if we can try many different things together like this in the upcoming tours too, I think we can spend it having fun

Taehyung Naver

56,209 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Isabelle Boemeke isabelle 🪐 on the pre-Hiroshima moment we’re in with AI. "The United States rushes to build the bomb, and up until that point there was a mix of excitement and fear about nuclear. I think it's similar to what we feel about AI at this moment. We are in that moment with AI where we can see both scenarios in our minds, right? It could be incredible. We could cure all these diseases, we could solve all these complex problems, but we can also all die. And it was a very similar thing, until the bombs were dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and all of that potential was cemented in one image, which was of a mushroom cloud."

Isabelle Boemeke isabelle 🪐 on the pre-Hiroshima moment we’re in with AI. "The United States rushes to build the bomb, and up until that point there was a mix of excitement and fear about nuclear. I think it's similar to what we feel about AI at this moment. We are in that moment with AI where we can see both scenarios in our minds, right? It could be incredible. We could cure all these diseases, we could solve all these complex problems, but we can also all die. And it was a very similar thing, until the bombs were dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and all of that potential was cemented in one image, which was of a mushroom cloud."

Sabrina Halper

41,314 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

We can understand and use artificial intelligence (AI) and other technological innovations in the context of faith. We are not afraid of AI, nor do we think it is the answer to every problem. As we work hard and smart, AI can be a valuable tool to enhance, but not replace, our own efforts. When we receive wisdom and understanding from God, we can begin to see as He sees—things we would otherwise not understand.

We can understand and use artificial intelligence (AI) and other technological innovations in the context of faith. We are not afraid of AI, nor do we think it is the answer to every problem. As we work hard and smart, AI can be a valuable tool to enhance, but not replace, our own efforts. When we receive wisdom and understanding from God, we can begin to see as He sees—things we would otherwise not understand.

Gerrit W. Gong

28,340 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Tucker Carlson to Sam Altman: I spoke to someone who's involved at scale of the development of the technology who said they lie. Have you ever seen that? Sam Altman: They hallucinate all the time, yeah. Or, not all the time, they used to hallucinate all the time. They now hallucinate a little bit. Tucker Carlson: What does that mean? What's the distinction between hallucinating and lying? Sam Altman: If you ask, again, this has gotten much better, but in the early days, if you asked, you know, what... in what year was President, the made up name, President Tucker Carlson of the United States born? Tucker Carlson: Mhm. Sam Altman: What it should say is, "I don't think Tucker Carlson was ever President of the United States," right? But because of the way they were trained, that was not the most likely response in the training data, so it would assume like, oh, um, you know, I don't know that there wasn't... the user has told me there was President Tucker Carlson, so I'll make my best guess at a number. And we figured out how to mostly train that out. There are still examples of this problem, but it is... I think it is something we will get fully solved, and we've already made, you know, in a GPT-5 era, a huge amount of progress towards that.

Tucker Carlson to Sam Altman: I spoke to someone who's involved at scale of the development of the technology who said they lie. Have you ever seen that? Sam Altman: They hallucinate all the time, yeah. Or, not all the time, they used to hallucinate all the time. They now hallucinate a little bit. Tucker Carlson: What does that mean? What's the distinction between hallucinating and lying? Sam Altman: If you ask, again, this has gotten much better, but in the early days, if you asked, you know, what... in what year was President, the made up name, President Tucker Carlson of the United States born? Tucker Carlson: Mhm. Sam Altman: What it should say is, "I don't think Tucker Carlson was ever President of the United States," right? But because of the way they were trained, that was not the most likely response in the training data, so it would assume like, oh, um, you know, I don't know that there wasn't... the user has told me there was President Tucker Carlson, so I'll make my best guess at a number. And we figured out how to mostly train that out. There are still examples of this problem, but it is... I think it is something we will get fully solved, and we've already made, you know, in a GPT-5 era, a huge amount of progress towards that.

Ruzy.hl

73,932 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

.Naval: Every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species. One of the things that you really learn when you read David Deutsch’s theories and you authenticate them for yourself is you realize humans are universal explainers. That means everything that we know in the universe follows the laws of physics, and there’s no reason to believe otherwise. If you think otherwise, then please present your better theory that explains the world. If you can’t do that, then you have to go with the laws of physics. Well, the laws of physics are completely computable. They can fit inside a Turing machine or computer, and a computer can simulate the laws of physics with arbitrary accuracy, limited only by the specific power of that computer. If you increase the power of that computer, you can simulate them more accurately. So humans already simulate—in our minds we simulate—and through our computers we simulate the weather, we simulate quasars, we even simulate human systems. We simulate the economy. We simulate all kinds of things. So anything that can be understood, we can understand in our minds. This is something the AGI people get wrong when they talk about superintelligence. There is nothing out there that can understand something fundamentally that we can’t understand. It might be faster at it, it might have more compute, it might have more memory, but there’s no concept that it can understand that we can’t ourselves understand. So we are maximal universal explainers. That means every human is capable of unbounded creativity. Anyone could be the next Einstein or Fermi or Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos or Jonas Salk or whatever. So we can create anything. And if we can create anything, every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species.

.Naval: Every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species. One of the things that you really learn when you read David Deutsch’s theories and you authenticate them for yourself is you realize humans are universal explainers. That means everything that we know in the universe follows the laws of physics, and there’s no reason to believe otherwise. If you think otherwise, then please present your better theory that explains the world. If you can’t do that, then you have to go with the laws of physics. Well, the laws of physics are completely computable. They can fit inside a Turing machine or computer, and a computer can simulate the laws of physics with arbitrary accuracy, limited only by the specific power of that computer. If you increase the power of that computer, you can simulate them more accurately. So humans already simulate—in our minds we simulate—and through our computers we simulate the weather, we simulate quasars, we even simulate human systems. We simulate the economy. We simulate all kinds of things. So anything that can be understood, we can understand in our minds. This is something the AGI people get wrong when they talk about superintelligence. There is nothing out there that can understand something fundamentally that we can’t understand. It might be faster at it, it might have more compute, it might have more memory, but there’s no concept that it can understand that we can’t ourselves understand. So we are maximal universal explainers. That means every human is capable of unbounded creativity. Anyone could be the next Einstein or Fermi or Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos or Jonas Salk or whatever. So we can create anything. And if we can create anything, every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species.

Arjun Khemani

32,810 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ro Khanna to a trans veteran: "There are some people in my party who think we should just talk about the price of eggs and the price of groceries and inflation. And we should. But you know what I think really moves people in this country? When you talk about our values. We cannot throw the trans community under the bus."

Ro Khanna to a trans veteran: "There are some people in my party who think we should just talk about the price of eggs and the price of groceries and inflation. And we should. But you know what I think really moves people in this country? When you talk about our values. We cannot throw the trans community under the bus."

Aaron Rupar

498,025 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Creator of C#, Anders Hejlsberg(Anders Hejlsberg), on the design goals that shaped the language and why standardisation was a goal from the beginning: “The overarching thing was this power and productivity of C++ with the ease of use of Visual Basic. We knew we wanted to build an object oriented language. We wanted managed code or byte code so we could target different runtime environments. We wanted garbage collection and exception handling, but also things like a unified object system where, and that's true in C#, anything can be assigned to an object. If it's a value type, we box it. And it's a self-describing object. So, reflection: you can ask an object, ‘what are you’? And you can get all of the facts about it at runtime, and you can dynamically manipulate it in ways that just don't exist in a lot of other environments. We wanted a language that made this new model of properties, methods and events first class because that was how components were built as opposed to just sort of functions and procedures and even objects. And we wanted to create a language that was standardised. We wanted to give this language to a standardisation committee and try to level the playing field there. And all of those things were sort of like what was rolled up in C#”

Creator of C#, Anders Hejlsberg(Anders Hejlsberg), on the design goals that shaped the language and why standardisation was a goal from the beginning: “The overarching thing was this power and productivity of C++ with the ease of use of Visual Basic. We knew we wanted to build an object oriented language. We wanted managed code or byte code so we could target different runtime environments. We wanted garbage collection and exception handling, but also things like a unified object system where, and that's true in C#, anything can be assigned to an object. If it's a value type, we box it. And it's a self-describing object. So, reflection: you can ask an object, ‘what are you’? And you can get all of the facts about it at runtime, and you can dynamically manipulate it in ways that just don't exist in a lot of other environments. We wanted a language that made this new model of properties, methods and events first class because that was how components were built as opposed to just sort of functions and procedures and even objects. And we wanted to create a language that was standardised. We wanted to give this language to a standardisation committee and try to level the playing field there. And all of those things were sort of like what was rolled up in C#”

The Pragmatic Engineer

18,332 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🗣️: Can you talk to Tul about everything? Mew : Yes, everything. We can talk about everything, no matter what it is. 🗣️: Like personal matters or just small things? Mew : I think the most important things we need to talk about are actually the small ones. The big things, we each deal with on our own. 🗣️: The big things, you can handle on your own because the small things are often what cause arguments, right? Mew : Exactly. I think most arguments come from the small things. We have to be careful with it. We know what we don’t like, so we tend to assume the other person probably doesn’t like it either.

🗣️: Can you talk to Tul about everything? Mew : Yes, everything. We can talk about everything, no matter what it is. 🗣️: Like personal matters or just small things? Mew : I think the most important things we need to talk about are actually the small ones. The big things, we each deal with on our own. 🗣️: The big things, you can handle on your own because the small things are often what cause arguments, right? Mew : Exactly. I think most arguments come from the small things. We have to be careful with it. We know what we don’t like, so we tend to assume the other person probably doesn’t like it either.

💞

11,932 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

[🎥] 260626 Hongjoong talks about how ATEEZ’s approach to making music has changed over the years | Zach Sang Show 🎤 You've mentioned ATINY a couple times. When you're making this music, do you think about what they want or do you guys make what you want and just hope they like it? 🐿️ Wow. Every time it's different. So, to be honest, when we were young, and before this Golden Hour series, we usually think about more about what ATINY really love, what ATINY really like it, and with timing, what kind of song where ATINY wanna listen. But during Golden Hour series, I think our members and me either, like, we have like eight different flavors of music… for the music. And we just wanna... So we did like almost eight years, like all together with (for) the, like, one song, we have eight voices and eight different flavors, but we just make songs for all together. So that makes us, like, sometimes, like this time, we just put some different genre that who like in the member, like in our group. So that's why sometimes the Latin music comes out and sometimes some kind of, like, very, like, hip-hop genre comes out, and like… but at the same time, we really consider about, yeah, we do kind of this music, but we wanna make it more ATEEZ style and also ATINY style, because ATEEZ love ATINY style originally - that's why they follow us. So we don't wanna make it, like, other groups or other artists' song, like, we just wanna make this genre with the ATEEZ style. So I think these days, we consider about everything, but like, more back then, like 2019 or 2020, that time, we just think about more, our fans love it. And these days, we think about more what we love at the same time, how we make it, fans love it. Yeah, so it's quite different (now).

[🎥] 260626 Hongjoong talks about how ATEEZ’s approach to making music has changed over the years | Zach Sang Show 🎤 You've mentioned ATINY a couple times. When you're making this music, do you think about what they want or do you guys make what you want and just hope they like it? 🐿️ Wow. Every time it's different. So, to be honest, when we were young, and before this Golden Hour series, we usually think about more about what ATINY really love, what ATINY really like it, and with timing, what kind of song where ATINY wanna listen. But during Golden Hour series, I think our members and me either, like, we have like eight different flavors of music… for the music. And we just wanna... So we did like almost eight years, like all together with (for) the, like, one song, we have eight voices and eight different flavors, but we just make songs for all together. So that makes us, like, sometimes, like this time, we just put some different genre that who like in the member, like in our group. So that's why sometimes the Latin music comes out and sometimes some kind of, like, very, like, hip-hop genre comes out, and like… but at the same time, we really consider about, yeah, we do kind of this music, but we wanna make it more ATEEZ style and also ATINY style, because ATEEZ love ATINY style originally - that's why they follow us. So we don't wanna make it, like, other groups or other artists' song, like, we just wanna make this genre with the ATEEZ style. So I think these days, we consider about everything, but like, more back then, like 2019 or 2020, that time, we just think about more, our fans love it. And these days, we think about more what we love at the same time, how we make it, fans love it. Yeah, so it's quite different (now).

Irene | AhgaTiny

18,103 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

“I can just picture this scene in a lamp-lit room with a bunch of guys eating Hummus thinking about what do we do about this guy telling the truth…“ The keyword = Hummus. Tucker Carlson knew exactly what he was implying. Do you?

“I can just picture this scene in a lamp-lit room with a bunch of guys eating Hummus thinking about what do we do about this guy telling the truth…“ The keyword = Hummus. Tucker Carlson knew exactly what he was implying. Do you?

MJTruthUltra

378,746 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Incredible last few minutes of the Rick Rubin / Adam Neumann interview. I got chills listening to this. --- Adam: We'll connected to this week's portion. We all have something that we're slaves to. We all have an addiction to anger, to ego, to power, whatever it is, idol worship that we have. We all have an Egypt. We all need to leave that Egypt, come out of it. When we come out of that Egypt, we all face a Red Sea. When we see that Red Sea, we all need to have the courage to walk into it so far that we drown. Only when we're willing to drown will the Red Sea be split and we'll go to our next level. We then go to our next level. We see the Red Sea split. Suddenly we're like, oh, everything is okay. And we forget. The moment we forget, we step into the desert. We all have to walk through our version of desert. That desert is between us, us, and God. No one else. The only decision we get to have is how long we're going to journey through that desert. Are we going to journey for 14 days like the children of Israel were supposed to? Or are we going to journey for 40 years because we're not learning our lesson? Our choice is not, are we going to get into the desert or not? It's how long will we be in. And once we go out of that desert, we all have our version of the promised land. And if we have the courage to look inside, see our own correction, our own limitation, look at it clearly now and say, I see you, and I'm going to get over it. I'm going to learn. I'm going to grow. I'm going to understand that life is not about falling down. It's about how I'm going to get up. I'm going to fall 1,000 times so I can get up 1,001 times. And in that last time when I get up and I'm actually ready to go to my next level, I'm going to wish for you, for me, and for everybody who are listening — please, may we have the courage to go to our next level because we know that the promised land is waiting right after it. And may we not be afraid when the whole world is saying this or that about us. Who cares? It's about what you think, what your wife thinks, what your kids think, and what the universe thinks. Rick: Amen. Adam: Amen. Thank you. Thank you, Hashem. Thank you.

Incredible last few minutes of the Rick Rubin / Adam Neumann interview. I got chills listening to this. --- Adam: We'll connected to this week's portion. We all have something that we're slaves to. We all have an addiction to anger, to ego, to power, whatever it is, idol worship that we have. We all have an Egypt. We all need to leave that Egypt, come out of it. When we come out of that Egypt, we all face a Red Sea. When we see that Red Sea, we all need to have the courage to walk into it so far that we drown. Only when we're willing to drown will the Red Sea be split and we'll go to our next level. We then go to our next level. We see the Red Sea split. Suddenly we're like, oh, everything is okay. And we forget. The moment we forget, we step into the desert. We all have to walk through our version of desert. That desert is between us, us, and God. No one else. The only decision we get to have is how long we're going to journey through that desert. Are we going to journey for 14 days like the children of Israel were supposed to? Or are we going to journey for 40 years because we're not learning our lesson? Our choice is not, are we going to get into the desert or not? It's how long will we be in. And once we go out of that desert, we all have our version of the promised land. And if we have the courage to look inside, see our own correction, our own limitation, look at it clearly now and say, I see you, and I'm going to get over it. I'm going to learn. I'm going to grow. I'm going to understand that life is not about falling down. It's about how I'm going to get up. I'm going to fall 1,000 times so I can get up 1,001 times. And in that last time when I get up and I'm actually ready to go to my next level, I'm going to wish for you, for me, and for everybody who are listening — please, may we have the courage to go to our next level because we know that the promised land is waiting right after it. And may we not be afraid when the whole world is saying this or that about us. Who cares? It's about what you think, what your wife thinks, what your kids think, and what the universe thinks. Rick: Amen. Adam: Amen. Thank you. Thank you, Hashem. Thank you.

Jared Zoneraich

153,335 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Dr. Ben Carson warns that the media will stop at nothing to elevate Kamala Harris from being “universally disliked” to a “godlike figure.” TUCKER CARLSON: “What do you think of Kamala Harris?” DR. BEN CARSON: “I think she is a politician.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Yeah.” DR. BEN CARSON: “And she's interested in the accumulation of power and control.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Do you think she believes in anything?” DR. BEN CARSON: “I think she believes in government, like most Marxists. Yes, I think she is a Marxist.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Do you think that she can win?” DR. BEN CARSON: “Absolutely she can win. This is going to be a great test of the power of the media to take someone who formerly was universally disliked and transform them into a godlike figure, and they will use everything that they have to try to do that. The question is, are the American people smart enough to see through it? And I actually think the American people are smarter than anybody gives them credit for. And I don't think that they are going to be willing to sacrifice what we have in this country, which is what everybody else wants, even though they try to denigrate our country, say we're systemically racist, we're unfair to people. If we were all that bad, why are all these people trying to get in here? Why aren't people trying to get out of here? So we know that we have something that's very good. And I think the American people realize that, and they're not willing to give that up and trade that for something inferior.”

Dr. Ben Carson warns that the media will stop at nothing to elevate Kamala Harris from being “universally disliked” to a “godlike figure.” TUCKER CARLSON: “What do you think of Kamala Harris?” DR. BEN CARSON: “I think she is a politician.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Yeah.” DR. BEN CARSON: “And she's interested in the accumulation of power and control.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Do you think she believes in anything?” DR. BEN CARSON: “I think she believes in government, like most Marxists. Yes, I think she is a Marxist.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Do you think that she can win?” DR. BEN CARSON: “Absolutely she can win. This is going to be a great test of the power of the media to take someone who formerly was universally disliked and transform them into a godlike figure, and they will use everything that they have to try to do that. The question is, are the American people smart enough to see through it? And I actually think the American people are smarter than anybody gives them credit for. And I don't think that they are going to be willing to sacrifice what we have in this country, which is what everybody else wants, even though they try to denigrate our country, say we're systemically racist, we're unfair to people. If we were all that bad, why are all these people trying to get in here? Why aren't people trying to get out of here? So we know that we have something that's very good. And I think the American people realize that, and they're not willing to give that up and trade that for something inferior.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,111,432 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#SOLAR and #MOONBYUL speaking about #MAMAMOO's comeback 🐰 Next year... the article got released first, it's about Mamamoo's comeback. Rather than saying clearly that there will be (a comeback), but right now, we are in the situation where there are things that needs to be coordinated. So I think it's difficult for us to say anything about it now. 🐹 Because we don't know what will happen in the future 🐰 That's right, I think that's is why we are being careful about how we are saying things now. Whenever moomoos asked us this question, the reason why we can simply say it out is because we are at the stage where we are still coordinating. 🐹 Nothing's confirmed. 🐹 We would love it if we can do it (comeback) Because we are Mamamoo, it'll be good if we can do it 🐰🐹 But since we are in different companies 🐰 There are many things needed, the coordination etc. 🐹 If we were to comeback as Mamamoo, we would like to do it properly, just like putting all our energies into it 🐰 I want to do it properly from the start till the end 🐹 And go meet lots of fans 🐰 That's right, but since there are still coordinations that needs to be done, so I seek for your understanding 🐹 The companies are speaking with each other now as well 🐹 I had the thought of wanting to address this to all of you 🐰 Many people are asking this everywhere rather than just passing it on with a short remark, but since this is an important thing, so I think it's difficult for us to just say anything now. 🐰 As we're on this topic now, we do not have any firm answers I hope all of you can understand. 🐹 If things are confirmed, I think we will say it together like 'all of you have waited for a long time right!'. Rather than making all of you wait blindly, that's the reason why we can speaking on this carefully.

#SOLAR and #MOONBYUL speaking about #MAMAMOO's comeback 🐰 Next year... the article got released first, it's about Mamamoo's comeback. Rather than saying clearly that there will be (a comeback), but right now, we are in the situation where there are things that needs to be coordinated. So I think it's difficult for us to say anything about it now. 🐹 Because we don't know what will happen in the future 🐰 That's right, I think that's is why we are being careful about how we are saying things now. Whenever moomoos asked us this question, the reason why we can simply say it out is because we are at the stage where we are still coordinating. 🐹 Nothing's confirmed. 🐹 We would love it if we can do it (comeback) Because we are Mamamoo, it'll be good if we can do it 🐰🐹 But since we are in different companies 🐰 There are many things needed, the coordination etc. 🐹 If we were to comeback as Mamamoo, we would like to do it properly, just like putting all our energies into it 🐰 I want to do it properly from the start till the end 🐹 And go meet lots of fans 🐰 That's right, but since there are still coordinations that needs to be done, so I seek for your understanding 🐹 The companies are speaking with each other now as well 🐹 I had the thought of wanting to address this to all of you 🐰 Many people are asking this everywhere rather than just passing it on with a short remark, but since this is an important thing, so I think it's difficult for us to just say anything now. 🐰 As we're on this topic now, we do not have any firm answers I hope all of you can understand. 🐹 If things are confirmed, I think we will say it together like 'all of you have waited for a long time right!'. Rather than making all of you wait blindly, that's the reason why we can speaking on this carefully.

ㅌㅂ/TV

104,317 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten