Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Reaching Net Zero by 2050 would require mining 4.5 million tons of copper, 940 million tons of nickel, 9 billion tons of graphite, and 4 million tons of germanium. At current global mining rates, that scale of extraction would take more than 1,000 years. Mining capacity cannot be multiplied...

36,339 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

34 Kommentare

Profilbild von CyberinTexas
CyberinTexasvor 1 Monat

Net Zero and Cholesterol are the same kind of scam. Convincing us to eliminate something that is actually good for us.

Profilbild von PB
PBvor 1 Monat

And they know the math is completely impossible because Net Zero was never about the climate. It is just the cover story for a total control grid. The financial industrial complex does not give a shit about green energy. They want managed decline, hollowing out the West through engineered debt, inflation, and unmitigated mass immigration designed to fracture social cohesion and keep everyone distracted while driving survival and ownership completely out of reach. While everyone gets bogged down arguing over fake climate targets and political theater, the real enclosure playbook is already moving in, turning our food supply into a locked laboratory subscription service and building out the digital ID and programmable currency trap. This is not just about getting locked out of a bank account. It is an open air prison. Once everything is tied to a centralized digital grid, compliance is not a choice. It is an absolute death sentence for anyone who steps out of line. You submit, eat their synthetic garbage, own nothing, and take what you are given, or you get cut off entirely and you are dead. And the second the West is sucked completely dry and left to rot, capital will pivot straight to the Middle East where resources and energy are still locked down by sovereign nations. The impossible targets are not a planning error. They are the blueprint for the cage.

Profilbild von Andy
Andyvor 1 Monat

Net Zero by anytime is moronic. No diesel fuel = No Farming so No Food. No more mining either. Railways, shipping, air travel? No more rubber tires for your EVS & E bikes either Packaging? TOILET PAPER?

Profilbild von Divergent Streams
Divergent Streamsvor 1 Monat

The more they can decrease the human population the less they will need those natural resources. It's simple math...

Profilbild von BSaphiraJul1989 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇬🇧 Douglas MacRae
BSaphiraJul1989 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇬🇧 Douglas MacRaevor 1 Monat

Piers Corbyn: "Climate policies are not to control climate, but to control you, which is part of a globalist agenda."

Profilbild von J_Wise_geology
J_Wise_geologyvor 1 Monat

Just for the USA, a minimum of 23.9 Mt of copper will be needed to drive only electric vehicles. Factor in the rest of the world, and NetZero power generation (solar and wind, plus the grids) - the world reserve of copper is not enough to build this. Not even close.

Profilbild von Dcguinn
Dcguinnvor 1 Monat

But keep shutting down reactors and destroying them.

Profilbild von JayJayLockerius
JayJayLockeriusvor 1 Monat

Current known resources of untapped copper are very low. And existing mines have to dig up more dirt to get equivalent amounts of copper. This isn't near-impossible, it's completely impossible.

Profilbild von John Smith🗽Israel 🇮🇱 must prevail
John Smith🗽Israel 🇮🇱 must prevailvor 1 Monat

Then there is the engineering and technicians to do the installation work. It always was pie in the sky. Only cultists believe it.

Profilbild von Simon Carr
Simon Carrvor 1 Monat

And they never should, the bovine intellects that didn’t think this through are the same ones profiting. I’m guessing they want in to the bunkers when the 💩 hits the fan Good luck with that morons

Profilbild von Chapter 4 Travels
Chapter 4 Travelsvor 1 Monat

Fake news. Renewables are not intended to replace fossil fuels one to one, more like .01 to one, the difference being massive degrowth and deindustrialization.

Profilbild von Make_My_Sammich
Make_My_Sammichvor 1 Monat

@aftonbob7 How does one mine all that shit with solar?

Profilbild von jpm
jpmvor 1 Monat

Net zero we will all be under the ground with no co2. Earth wil be without green and trees . Birds will die

Profilbild von Paul Lumberjack
Paul Lumberjackvor 1 Monat

This strikes me as an argument for nuclear. A 5,600 MW plant uses a fraction of the copper per MWh that wind or solar builds need.

Profilbild von Tim McGuire
Tim McGuirevor 1 Monat

@BHP’s entire nickel division is currently in care and maintenance… because demand (and by association price) are not there.

Profilbild von Downtown Scott Brown
Downtown Scott Brownvor 1 Monat

Pesky mining problem 🤔

Profilbild von Peter
Petervor 1 Monat

These sound very trivial- tons over 24 years, mate! The world burns 9.1 billion tons of coal. We Aussies dig up 1.3 billion, not millions. You know that's 9,100 million tons burnt each year, sent up in smoke. Don't concern yourself about a couple of turbines on fire, mate; China builds hundreds of thousands. Perhaps the brake failed? Whatever, there is a remedy. Don't know why central banks think gold needs to be bought at the Tulip Bulb price. When 3k tons a year are mined every year, not oz. Only 8% is needed for industrial use. I buy Bitcoin. Only one time to buy, anytime, at any price. If you like big numbers, here is one: 100,000,000 sats (Satoris) to each very rare diamond. When only 21 million exist.

Profilbild von Marco Vermeij
Marco Vermeijvor 1 Monat

But they (the greens and their allies) will ruin us regardless, because their paymasters told them so.

Profilbild von TheEarthDiesScreaming
TheEarthDiesScreamingvor 1 Monat

Not only that. The upfront Carbon spent for it would account to the equivalent of Carbon held in trillions of trees, while cities are flushing NPK + micronutrients needed to feed billions. Delusional...

Profilbild von GreenGenieWales 🇬🇧🌍🌡️
GreenGenieWales 🇬🇧🌍🌡️vor 1 Monat

Where do you get your "𝟵 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲 and 𝟰 𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗴𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘂𝗺" figures from?

Profilbild von Carl Horvath
Carl Horvathvor 1 Monat

If Net Zero is economically and realistically feasible, why wouldn't some community of ~500 anywhere actually demonstrate this.

Profilbild von fatman45
fatman45vor 1 Monat

Watch the movie "Planet of the Humans" by Michael Moore. He actually does a good job of showing that it is physically impossible. The hinted at but unspoken conclusion is that the only answer is to "cull the herd", as it were. 😒

Profilbild von Keith
Keithvor 1 Monat

Energy and water vapor are by far the leading drivers of warming…carbon is very small potatoes in comparison. Don’t climate scientists know how to use Pareto Charts?

Profilbild von Change-Awake
Change-Awakevor 1 Monat

Netto-Null-Ziele verstoßen gegen die materielle Realität... Das wissen auch die Urheber, aber sie bezwecken ja auch nicht das das Ziel Netto-Null zu erreichen, sondern ein moralisches Druckmittel zu schaffen, als universeller Kraftstoff für ihre Agenden...

Profilbild von keith
keithvor 1 Monat

Is this calculation based on solely the number of PV panels and WT blades to achieve and equal the current level of MW output of traditional power stations, because if you factor in replacing each item above at end of life every 20 years, then it'll likely be 10 X this time!!!

Profilbild von Richard Rothwell
Richard Rothwellvor 1 Monat

When you imagine you are smarter than a climate scientist, so you make up resource extraction figures. Germanium is not a player in commercial large scale solar power photovoltaic systems. Graphite can be synthesized, not only mined.

Profilbild von Astute Punter
Astute Puntervor 1 Monat

All that & still wouldn’t reach net zero.

Profilbild von Lookingup52
Lookingup52vor 1 Monat

Plant TREES.

Profilbild von Energiewende: ⚡aus 🌞🌪️+⚛️
Energiewende: ⚡aus 🌞🌪️+⚛️vor 1 Monat

Das Netto Null hat Deutschland bereits 2026 auf vielen anderen Ebenen erreicht: Ohne günstiges Gas als Energie und Rohstoff keine: Produktion Arbeit Wohlstand sozialen Frieden

Profilbild von S A Wilber
S A Wilbervor 1 Monat

totally fantastic numbers, and i mean impossible numbers. if you were an engineer, your head would explode before you could utter these whoppers.

Profilbild von Crio Songo
Crio Songovor 1 Monat

确实是这样,矿产开采扩容不可能一蹴而就,物理限制摆在这,净零目标确实得重新考虑可行性。

Profilbild von Teus van Houwelingen
Teus van Houwelingenvor 1 Monat

You are abosolutely mistaken. Living in the stone age means you only need stones.

Profilbild von ......
......vor 1 Monat

#bcpoli @BoardofTrade $TECK @Mc_BC

Profilbild von Andre Pieck
Andre Pieckvor 1 Monat

Statements, no supporting link. Why do you keep doing this?

Ähnliche Videos