Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

REAGAN: “When someone says let’s impose tariffs, it may look like they’re doing the patriotic thing… but over the long run trade barriers hurt every 🇺🇸 worker.” 🇨🇦 Ontario just ran this👇🏽powerful ad using Reagan’s voice against Trump’s trade war during game 7 of the ALCS ⚾️

The Tennessee Holler

300,712 subscribers

272,464 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Comedy

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

FAFO! The Premier of Ontario, Doug Ford, says he will not let up and will continue their $75M ad campaign using Ronald Reagan's voice against Tariffs “The Ronald Reagan Foundation announced that Canada FRAUDULENTLY used a FAKE advertisement featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about tariffs.“ Last night, President Trump announced he is TERMINATING ALL Trade negotiations with Canada

FAFO! The Premier of Ontario, Doug Ford, says he will not let up and will continue their $75M ad campaign using Ronald Reagan's voice against Tariffs “The Ronald Reagan Foundation announced that Canada FRAUDULENTLY used a FAKE advertisement featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about tariffs.“ Last night, President Trump announced he is TERMINATING ALL Trade negotiations with Canada

MJTruthUltra

54,132 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

“Doug Ford is against Carney doing China deal because of EVs and said it’ll make it harder to do trade with Trump - this from the guy who ran ad about Reagan and stopped our trade negotiations! Now thinks that he can tell Carney what the f*ck to do?” 🇨🇦

“Doug Ford is against Carney doing China deal because of EVs and said it’ll make it harder to do trade with Trump - this from the guy who ran ad about Reagan and stopped our trade negotiations! Now thinks that he can tell Carney what the f*ck to do?” 🇨🇦

Laura Babcock 🇨🇦

55,287 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Another soybean farmer just broke ranks over Trump’s tariff war: “We don’t want a bailout. We want the freedom to trade.” They’re watching decades of market access vanish overnight and some say they may never recover. This wasn’t a strategy. It was a trade war stunt dressed up as patriotism. And it’s the American farmer paying the price.

Another soybean farmer just broke ranks over Trump’s tariff war: “We don’t want a bailout. We want the freedom to trade.” They’re watching decades of market access vanish overnight and some say they may never recover. This wasn’t a strategy. It was a trade war stunt dressed up as patriotism. And it’s the American farmer paying the price.

Brian Allen

204,762 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: Trump just declared war on 🇨🇦 cars—50-100% tariffs could crush the industry. Detroit wins, 🇨🇦 bleeds. Buckle up. 1️⃣ 25% 🇺🇸 steel & aluminum tariffs already in place. 🇨🇦 auto manufacturing relies heavily on these materials. Higher costs = massive industry-wide price hikes. 2️⃣ 🇨🇦 auto industry employs over 500,000 people. Factories in Ontario (Windsor, Oshawa, Ingersoll, etc.) are at risk. Thousands of jobs could disappear overnight. 3️⃣ 🇺🇸 - 🇨🇦 auto trade is a $100B+ market. 🇨🇦 exports ~$60B in vehicles & parts to the 🇺🇸 yearly. A 100% tariff would make 🇨🇦 cars completely unaffordable. 4️⃣ Trump claims " 🇨🇦 stole the car industry." Calls 🇺🇸 leaders "asleep at the wheel." Wants all production moved to Detroit. 5️⃣ CUSMA (new NAFTA) up for renegotiation in 2026. If this happens now, what’s next? Full-scale trade war? 6️⃣ 1965 Auto Pact created free trade for cars. Ended in 1994 with NAFTA. Is Trump trying to reverse 60 years of trade agreements? This could be the biggest economic attack on 🇨🇦 in decades. What do you think—should 🇨🇦 retaliate?

🚨BREAKING: Trump just declared war on 🇨🇦 cars—50-100% tariffs could crush the industry. Detroit wins, 🇨🇦 bleeds. Buckle up. 1️⃣ 25% 🇺🇸 steel & aluminum tariffs already in place. 🇨🇦 auto manufacturing relies heavily on these materials. Higher costs = massive industry-wide price hikes. 2️⃣ 🇨🇦 auto industry employs over 500,000 people. Factories in Ontario (Windsor, Oshawa, Ingersoll, etc.) are at risk. Thousands of jobs could disappear overnight. 3️⃣ 🇺🇸 - 🇨🇦 auto trade is a $100B+ market. 🇨🇦 exports ~$60B in vehicles & parts to the 🇺🇸 yearly. A 100% tariff would make 🇨🇦 cars completely unaffordable. 4️⃣ Trump claims " 🇨🇦 stole the car industry." Calls 🇺🇸 leaders "asleep at the wheel." Wants all production moved to Detroit. 5️⃣ CUSMA (new NAFTA) up for renegotiation in 2026. If this happens now, what’s next? Full-scale trade war? 6️⃣ 1965 Auto Pact created free trade for cars. Ended in 1994 with NAFTA. Is Trump trying to reverse 60 years of trade agreements? This could be the biggest economic attack on 🇨🇦 in decades. What do you think—should 🇨🇦 retaliate?

Shazi

54,128 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 BREAKING: Trudeau breaks down in tears after a heated call with Trump. Reports say the conversation was “colorful”—translation: Trump probably threw a tantrum about tariffs, and Trudeau isn’t having it. Canada has already banned U.S. alcohol, refuses to budge on Trump’s trade war, and now Trudeau is feeling the pressure as he prepares to step down. Meanwhile, MAGA is celebrating like they just won a war—but let’s be real, this trade war is hurting American businesses just as much. The fallout is coming.

🚨 BREAKING: Trudeau breaks down in tears after a heated call with Trump. Reports say the conversation was “colorful”—translation: Trump probably threw a tantrum about tariffs, and Trudeau isn’t having it. Canada has already banned U.S. alcohol, refuses to budge on Trump’s trade war, and now Trudeau is feeling the pressure as he prepares to step down. Meanwhile, MAGA is celebrating like they just won a war—but let’s be real, this trade war is hurting American businesses just as much. The fallout is coming.

Brian Allen

6,450,292 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney just declared economic "war" on the United States over Trump's 50% tariffs. But this isn't really about trade. Look at who Carney is. He's one of the most powerful supporters of the Great Reset that Trump is trying to destroy. And look who he just hired as his Chief Operating Officer: Maia Johnson, an American Democratic operative who worked on the Hillary Clinton, Biden, and Harris campaigns. She built her career trying to beat Trump. Now, Carney is hoping she can help him do it. Carney knows that Canada can't win a trade war against the U.S. So, he's embracing the same strategy as Iran and every other enemy of Trump: target the American people and aim the pain at them. He's betting on Americans to get tired enough that they put the Democrats who supported the Great Reset back in power. That's the real goal of his trade war.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney just declared economic "war" on the United States over Trump's 50% tariffs. But this isn't really about trade. Look at who Carney is. He's one of the most powerful supporters of the Great Reset that Trump is trying to destroy. And look who he just hired as his Chief Operating Officer: Maia Johnson, an American Democratic operative who worked on the Hillary Clinton, Biden, and Harris campaigns. She built her career trying to beat Trump. Now, Carney is hoping she can help him do it. Carney knows that Canada can't win a trade war against the U.S. So, he's embracing the same strategy as Iran and every other enemy of Trump: target the American people and aim the pain at them. He's betting on Americans to get tired enough that they put the Democrats who supported the Great Reset back in power. That's the real goal of his trade war.

Glenn Beck

367,517 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

The figures for the supposed tariffs that the US is "reciprocating" against seem to be drawn out of thin air. For instance, Trump claimed the EU imposes 39% tariffs on US imports. The figure is actually 1%. 🇺🇸 says they're calculating non-tariff barriers but won't show their work. It appears different standards are being used for different countries based on politics. For instance, Russia is exempt from this trade war. This makes an air-tight legal case for the EU to say these "reciprocal tariffs" are in fact arbitrary tariffs, Commission officials believe. And it should enable them to slap retaliatory tariffs on US services, which could cripple US banks and big tech.

The figures for the supposed tariffs that the US is "reciprocating" against seem to be drawn out of thin air. For instance, Trump claimed the EU imposes 39% tariffs on US imports. The figure is actually 1%. 🇺🇸 says they're calculating non-tariff barriers but won't show their work. It appears different standards are being used for different countries based on politics. For instance, Russia is exempt from this trade war. This makes an air-tight legal case for the EU to say these "reciprocal tariffs" are in fact arbitrary tariffs, Commission officials believe. And it should enable them to slap retaliatory tariffs on US services, which could cripple US banks and big tech.

Dave Keating

20,836 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇺🇸Trump’s Tariff Plan Explained: Destroy or Help The US Economy? Trump describes tariffs as his "favorite word." To understand the concept, think of it like this: Imagine you’re an accountant seeking business referrals. You meet someone who sells auto insurance, and you agree to exchange referrals equally. A month later, you’ve given them five referrals, but they haven’t given you any. You now have a "referral deficit" while they have a "referral surplus." This is similar to a trade deficit versus a trade surplus. Now, on a larger scale, the U.S. has a global trade deficit of $1.1 trillion, meaning it has provided $1.1 trillion more business to other countries than it has received. China, on the other hand, has a trade surplus of $823 billion, receiving more business than it gives. Trump’s use of tariffs is an attempt to address these imbalances and renegotiate trade deals. Tariffs are tools that governments can use to create leverage in trade negotiations. Historically, tariffs have been used as a form of taxation on imports, dating back to the Roman Empire and becoming prominent in the mercantilist policies of the 16th and 18th centuries. Economist Adam Smith, known for his book Wealth of Nations, argued that tariffs can disrupt free trade, but he noted 2 exceptions: protecting industries critical to national security and counteracting tariffs imposed by other nations. These points remain relevant in modern trade discussions. When examining trade surpluses and deficits globally, China leads with a significant surplus, while countries like the U.S., UK, and India experience deficits. Tariffs can serve as leverage to balance these relationships and ensure fair trade practices. Understanding tariffs and trade negotiations is key to grasping how governments seek to protect their economies and industries in a globalized world. Source: Patrick Bet-David , @ValuetainmentTV

🇺🇸Trump’s Tariff Plan Explained: Destroy or Help The US Economy? Trump describes tariffs as his "favorite word." To understand the concept, think of it like this: Imagine you’re an accountant seeking business referrals. You meet someone who sells auto insurance, and you agree to exchange referrals equally. A month later, you’ve given them five referrals, but they haven’t given you any. You now have a "referral deficit" while they have a "referral surplus." This is similar to a trade deficit versus a trade surplus. Now, on a larger scale, the U.S. has a global trade deficit of $1.1 trillion, meaning it has provided $1.1 trillion more business to other countries than it has received. China, on the other hand, has a trade surplus of $823 billion, receiving more business than it gives. Trump’s use of tariffs is an attempt to address these imbalances and renegotiate trade deals. Tariffs are tools that governments can use to create leverage in trade negotiations. Historically, tariffs have been used as a form of taxation on imports, dating back to the Roman Empire and becoming prominent in the mercantilist policies of the 16th and 18th centuries. Economist Adam Smith, known for his book Wealth of Nations, argued that tariffs can disrupt free trade, but he noted 2 exceptions: protecting industries critical to national security and counteracting tariffs imposed by other nations. These points remain relevant in modern trade discussions. When examining trade surpluses and deficits globally, China leads with a significant surplus, while countries like the U.S., UK, and India experience deficits. Tariffs can serve as leverage to balance these relationships and ensure fair trade practices. Understanding tariffs and trade negotiations is key to grasping how governments seek to protect their economies and industries in a globalized world. Source: Patrick Bet-David , @ValuetainmentTV

Mario Nawfal

322,734 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 BOOM: Stephen Miller just went straight at the Supreme Court — and he’s siding with Justice Clarence Thomas. Miller says the majority blew it on tariffs and that Thomas’ dissent reflects the plain meaning of the law. His argument is simple. You cannot separate trade from foreign policy. When America negotiates with adversarial nations, trade is leverage. That’s exactly why Congress delegated authority to the president under statutes like the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Flexibility during global crises wasn’t an accident. It was the design. Miller also pointed to history. When President Nixon used similar statutory language to impose tariffs, the meaning of that authority wasn’t questioned. Now, he argues, the Court is narrowing powers that Congress intentionally granted. This isn’t just about tariffs. It’s about who steers American economic power in a geopolitical fight. Does the president need broad authority to respond quickly to foreign threats and economic coercion? Or should courts tightly restrict how that authority is exercised? This ruling may have drawn lines. But the constitutional debate over executive trade power is far from settled. So what matters more in a global economic showdown — speed and flexibility, or strict judicial guardrails?

🚨 BOOM: Stephen Miller just went straight at the Supreme Court — and he’s siding with Justice Clarence Thomas. Miller says the majority blew it on tariffs and that Thomas’ dissent reflects the plain meaning of the law. His argument is simple. You cannot separate trade from foreign policy. When America negotiates with adversarial nations, trade is leverage. That’s exactly why Congress delegated authority to the president under statutes like the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Flexibility during global crises wasn’t an accident. It was the design. Miller also pointed to history. When President Nixon used similar statutory language to impose tariffs, the meaning of that authority wasn’t questioned. Now, he argues, the Court is narrowing powers that Congress intentionally granted. This isn’t just about tariffs. It’s about who steers American economic power in a geopolitical fight. Does the president need broad authority to respond quickly to foreign threats and economic coercion? Or should courts tightly restrict how that authority is exercised? This ruling may have drawn lines. But the constitutional debate over executive trade power is far from settled. So what matters more in a global economic showdown — speed and flexibility, or strict judicial guardrails?

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

51,951 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

TARIFFS: Trump’s tariffs have been smeared as reckless and arbitrary by the media, Democrats, Europeans, and libertarians, but according to Oren Cass, this criticism is a mixture of economic orthodoxy, bad faith, and willful ignorance. Far from being impulsive, Trump’s tariffs are grounded in a published formula and follow the harmonized tariff schedule, which necessarily includes obscure territories like penguin-filled islands, hardly evidence of chaos. The so-called “reciprocal tariffs” were never about tit-for-tat retaliation, but proportional responses to trade imbalances, a distinction Cass says critics deliberately muddled to maintain a lazy narrative. Cass recalls confronting the Beltway’s refusal to grapple seriously with China, and he sees Trump’s policy, like Reagan’s before it, as a necessary correction to decades of economic dogma that sacrificed American industry at the altar of globalism. h/t Michael Shellenberger

TARIFFS: Trump’s tariffs have been smeared as reckless and arbitrary by the media, Democrats, Europeans, and libertarians, but according to Oren Cass, this criticism is a mixture of economic orthodoxy, bad faith, and willful ignorance. Far from being impulsive, Trump’s tariffs are grounded in a published formula and follow the harmonized tariff schedule, which necessarily includes obscure territories like penguin-filled islands, hardly evidence of chaos. The so-called “reciprocal tariffs” were never about tit-for-tat retaliation, but proportional responses to trade imbalances, a distinction Cass says critics deliberately muddled to maintain a lazy narrative. Cass recalls confronting the Beltway’s refusal to grapple seriously with China, and he sees Trump’s policy, like Reagan’s before it, as a necessary correction to decades of economic dogma that sacrificed American industry at the altar of globalism. h/t Michael Shellenberger

@amuse

51,712 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇨🇳🇺🇸 China’s trade surplus is now a monster even China “can’t stop” from growing. 2025 ended with $1.2 trillion in surplus, the highest in human history. Trump escalated his trade war, cut US imports, raised tariffs… And what happened? China didn’t collapse. China simply replaced the US with the rest of the world. 📉 US share of China’s total trade: 8.8%, an all-time low. 📈 Exports to South America, Africa, SE Asia, Europe: surging. 📈 December exports: +6.6% (expected 3%) 📈 December imports: +5.7% (expected 0.9%) America says it’s “decoupling China.” No, China quietly decoupled America from its supply chain. Trump’s favorite weapon is tariffs. But when your opponent is an industrial hydra feeding 150+ markets, tariffs don’t “cripple” anything, they just redirect the flow. So what’s next? Sanctions? More tariffs? Threaten to bomb container ships? Good luck intimidating the world’s biggest factory. At this point the US isn’t “containing China.” It’s just excluding itself from growth.

🇨🇳🇺🇸 China’s trade surplus is now a monster even China “can’t stop” from growing. 2025 ended with $1.2 trillion in surplus, the highest in human history. Trump escalated his trade war, cut US imports, raised tariffs… And what happened? China didn’t collapse. China simply replaced the US with the rest of the world. 📉 US share of China’s total trade: 8.8%, an all-time low. 📈 Exports to South America, Africa, SE Asia, Europe: surging. 📈 December exports: +6.6% (expected 3%) 📈 December imports: +5.7% (expected 0.9%) America says it’s “decoupling China.” No, China quietly decoupled America from its supply chain. Trump’s favorite weapon is tariffs. But when your opponent is an industrial hydra feeding 150+ markets, tariffs don’t “cripple” anything, they just redirect the flow. So what’s next? Sanctions? More tariffs? Threaten to bomb container ships? Good luck intimidating the world’s biggest factory. At this point the US isn’t “containing China.” It’s just excluding itself from growth.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

120,726 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 DEMOCRATS ARE MELTING DOWN OVER TRUMP ACTUALLY ENFORCING TRADE DEALS Congressman Brendan Boyle just went full panic mode on MSNOW: Trade war with Canada will “push us over the edge” into recession… Tariffs are the worst since the Great Depression… And somehow easing beef tariffs for 90 days to lower grocery prices is also a disaster. Let’s get this straight: Canada has been hammering American farmers with tariffs for years. Trump finally hits back. Suddenly it’s “attacking our allies.” When he temporarily eases beef tariffs to help consumers, Republicans and Democrats both cry that it’s hurting ranchers. There’s no winning with these people. They spent years ignoring Canadian tariffs that hurt our producers. Now that Trump is matching them, it’s an economic apocalypse. And of course Boyle ends with the classic Democrat pivot: If the economy struggles, Trump will just “demonize” illegals to distract people. The real distraction is Democrats pretending free trade only works in one direction.

🚨 DEMOCRATS ARE MELTING DOWN OVER TRUMP ACTUALLY ENFORCING TRADE DEALS Congressman Brendan Boyle just went full panic mode on MSNOW: Trade war with Canada will “push us over the edge” into recession… Tariffs are the worst since the Great Depression… And somehow easing beef tariffs for 90 days to lower grocery prices is also a disaster. Let’s get this straight: Canada has been hammering American farmers with tariffs for years. Trump finally hits back. Suddenly it’s “attacking our allies.” When he temporarily eases beef tariffs to help consumers, Republicans and Democrats both cry that it’s hurting ranchers. There’s no winning with these people. They spent years ignoring Canadian tariffs that hurt our producers. Now that Trump is matching them, it’s an economic apocalypse. And of course Boyle ends with the classic Democrat pivot: If the economy struggles, Trump will just “demonize” illegals to distract people. The real distraction is Democrats pretending free trade only works in one direction.

Gunther Eagleman™

52,116 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

🚨 MSNOW IS HAVING A FULL MELTDOWN OVER TRUMP STANDING UP TO CANADA They’re calling it a “trade war with our friends up north” while clutching pearls about prices. Meanwhile Canada has been slamming American farmers with massive tariffs for YEARS. Trump’s response? No more free ride. You want the benefits of the American market? Stop treating our producers like suckers. Canada’s Prime Minister is out here saying “we got attacked”… after years of attacking our farmers first. Reciprocity is not aggression. It’s called finally putting America first. The media only discovers “trade wars” when the other side starts losing.

🚨 MSNOW IS HAVING A FULL MELTDOWN OVER TRUMP STANDING UP TO CANADA They’re calling it a “trade war with our friends up north” while clutching pearls about prices. Meanwhile Canada has been slamming American farmers with massive tariffs for YEARS. Trump’s response? No more free ride. You want the benefits of the American market? Stop treating our producers like suckers. Canada’s Prime Minister is out here saying “we got attacked”… after years of attacking our farmers first. Reciprocity is not aggression. It’s called finally putting America first. The media only discovers “trade wars” when the other side starts losing.

Gunther Eagleman™

55,077 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

Here’s the original clip of Ronald Reagan from April 25, 1987, where he delivered a complete and total rebuke against tariffs. Trump is calling Reagan’s words in this video “FAKE” and “fraudulent.” They’re 100% real. And the original clip is actually far worse for Trump, as much is left out of the ad. Watch this clip and read the full transcript: Throughout the world, there's a growing realization that the way to prosperity for all nations is rejecting protectionist legislation and promoting fair and free competition. Now, there are sound historical reasons for this. For those of us who lived through the Great Depression, the memory of the suffering it caused is deep and searing. And today, many economic analysts and historians argue that high tariff legislation passed back in that period, called the Smoot-Hawley tariff, greatly deepened the depression and prevented economic recovery. You see, at first when someone says, let's impose tariffs on foreign imports, it looks like they're doing the patriotic thing by protecting American products and jobs. And sometimes for a short while, it works, but only for a short time. What eventually occurs is, first, homegrown industries start relying on government protection in the form of high tariffs. They stop competing and stop making the innovative management and technological changes they need to succeed in world markets. And then, while all this is going on, something even worse occurs. High tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the triggering of fierce trade wars. The result is more and more tariffs, higher and higher trade barriers, and less and less competition. So soon, because of the prices made artificially high by tariffs that subsidize inefficiency and poor management, people stop buying. Then the worst happens. Markets shrink and collapse, businesses and industry shut down, and millions of people lose their jobs. The memory of all this occurring back in the 30s made me determined when I came to Washington to spare the American people the protectionist legislation that destroys prosperity. Now, it hasn't always been easy. There are those in the Congress, just as there were back in the 30s, who want to go for the quick political advantage, who risk America's prosperity for the sake of a short-term appeal to some special interest group, who forget that more than 5 million American jobs are directly tied to the foreign export business, and additional millions are tied to imports. Well, I've never forgotten those jobs. And on trade issues, by and large, we've done well.

Here’s the original clip of Ronald Reagan from April 25, 1987, where he delivered a complete and total rebuke against tariffs. Trump is calling Reagan’s words in this video “FAKE” and “fraudulent.” They’re 100% real. And the original clip is actually far worse for Trump, as much is left out of the ad. Watch this clip and read the full transcript: Throughout the world, there's a growing realization that the way to prosperity for all nations is rejecting protectionist legislation and promoting fair and free competition. Now, there are sound historical reasons for this. For those of us who lived through the Great Depression, the memory of the suffering it caused is deep and searing. And today, many economic analysts and historians argue that high tariff legislation passed back in that period, called the Smoot-Hawley tariff, greatly deepened the depression and prevented economic recovery. You see, at first when someone says, let's impose tariffs on foreign imports, it looks like they're doing the patriotic thing by protecting American products and jobs. And sometimes for a short while, it works, but only for a short time. What eventually occurs is, first, homegrown industries start relying on government protection in the form of high tariffs. They stop competing and stop making the innovative management and technological changes they need to succeed in world markets. And then, while all this is going on, something even worse occurs. High tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the triggering of fierce trade wars. The result is more and more tariffs, higher and higher trade barriers, and less and less competition. So soon, because of the prices made artificially high by tariffs that subsidize inefficiency and poor management, people stop buying. Then the worst happens. Markets shrink and collapse, businesses and industry shut down, and millions of people lose their jobs. The memory of all this occurring back in the 30s made me determined when I came to Washington to spare the American people the protectionist legislation that destroys prosperity. Now, it hasn't always been easy. There are those in the Congress, just as there were back in the 30s, who want to go for the quick political advantage, who risk America's prosperity for the sake of a short-term appeal to some special interest group, who forget that more than 5 million American jobs are directly tied to the foreign export business, and additional millions are tied to imports. Well, I've never forgotten those jobs. And on trade issues, by and large, we've done well.

MeidasTouch

3,719,170 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten