Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Really hope this doesn't make it into 2K27. This is obviously offline against the AI, but the same thing happens online as well. You beat the defender clean but end up in a bump steal animation. All that happens is, the defender inadvertently knocks the ball loose at the... tail end of the contact animation. They aren't actually trying to steal it... it's just that any contact with the ball from the defender seems to end up triggering this. The idea makes sense, but it's obviously flawed in certain scenarios. This is why that patch that so many people praised was reversed. Sure you could probably get a steal in a situation like this in real life, but that's not what this is, so please don't present that disingenuous argument. #NBA2K26show more

ᴅɪᴍᴇᴡᴏʀᴋ🧪🥼

12,628 subscribers

13,404 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The offense has been so terrible minus Roman that in the end this doesn't matter but this is the best I could do to zoom in. Looks like glove is touching at all points, wouldn't make any sense the way the ball ended up showing in his glove if it actually touched the ground.

The offense has been so terrible minus Roman that in the end this doesn't matter but this is the best I could do to zoom in. Looks like glove is touching at all points, wouldn't make any sense the way the ball ended up showing in his glove if it actually touched the ground.

🏆BostonTBA🏆

396,585 views • 23 days ago

🐶 there's a comment that they keep asking if this is the last. It's not 🐹 you guys are thinking this is the end? but this is just the beginning for us 🐶 It's not the end. Absolutely not. It seems some of you have misunderstood because of our song's vibe. it's just the concept

🐶 there's a comment that they keep asking if this is the last. It's not 🐹 you guys are thinking this is the end? but this is just the beginning for us 🐶 It's not the end. Absolutely not. It seems some of you have misunderstood because of our song's vibe. it's just the concept

정휘인🧡

50,718 views • 3 months ago

Here's the all-22 view of this play. Yes, Johnson is open initially, but even from a clean pocket that ball is going to have to be in the air for a long time. I'm not buying that he's out-running Grant Delpit. Like being aggressive with the lead and like this play design, but not sure the juice was worth the squeeze in this situation

Here's the all-22 view of this play. Yes, Johnson is open initially, but even from a clean pocket that ball is going to have to be in the air for a long time. I'm not buying that he's out-running Grant Delpit. Like being aggressive with the lead and like this play design, but not sure the juice was worth the squeeze in this situation

Dan Duggan

50,335 views • 2 years ago

Scott on why conviction in an idea is dangerous as an investor but required as a founder: "From the investor seat, I don't think you want to be in love with an idea. That's a risky thing because you'll find a way to express that by investing and make some compromises on the team because you know this idea is just so good, its time has come. But if the team isn't there, 90% of the time it doesn't work. Then there's a whole thing can you swap out the team? But the whole Founders Fund thesis was always no, you need the founder to run the company. But on the company side, you have to be in love with the idea. It's not that rational to start a company. There's a lot easier, more comfortable ways to make money if that's the goal. So it's got to be about what the company is doing specifically. If you want to actually start a company, it better be something that you're really passionate about, or you think that the problem is really important."

Scott on why conviction in an idea is dangerous as an investor but required as a founder: "From the investor seat, I don't think you want to be in love with an idea. That's a risky thing because you'll find a way to express that by investing and make some compromises on the team because you know this idea is just so good, its time has come. But if the team isn't there, 90% of the time it doesn't work. Then there's a whole thing can you swap out the team? But the whole Founders Fund thesis was always no, you need the founder to run the company. But on the company side, you have to be in love with the idea. It's not that rational to start a company. There's a lot easier, more comfortable ways to make money if that's the goal. So it's got to be about what the company is doing specifically. If you want to actually start a company, it better be something that you're really passionate about, or you think that the problem is really important."

Patrick OShaughnessy

33,016 views • 5 months ago

“What I think SPX is, is a wake-up call. And I think for the normie, the average person, it literally is best described as being the next Bitcoin, because that's literally what it is. Bitcoin was a wake-up call to show people that value is subjective. And SPX is the next iteration of that. And once you get enough people to understand that the value of the dollar is subjective. It only has value because people believe in it. Bitcoin only has value because people believe in it. SPX has value because people believe in it. And the next step is Well, it's not just money that is subjective in value. It is literally everything is subjective. The entire universe is this subjective entity that is created from our own consciousness. And that's what Like, the purpose of this vehicle, yes, it's going to make a lot of people a lot of money, but the point of that is to wake people up to the fact that the entire universe is this subjective entity. It is not just this, like, empirical machine with interlocking gears and like this orderly machine that proceeds from just like the sum of its parts like no like we are literally the universe creating the universe and that's what spx is meant to wake people up to.” — Crypto Maxi 💹🧲

“What I think SPX is, is a wake-up call. And I think for the normie, the average person, it literally is best described as being the next Bitcoin, because that's literally what it is. Bitcoin was a wake-up call to show people that value is subjective. And SPX is the next iteration of that. And once you get enough people to understand that the value of the dollar is subjective. It only has value because people believe in it. Bitcoin only has value because people believe in it. SPX has value because people believe in it. And the next step is Well, it's not just money that is subjective in value. It is literally everything is subjective. The entire universe is this subjective entity that is created from our own consciousness. And that's what Like, the purpose of this vehicle, yes, it's going to make a lot of people a lot of money, but the point of that is to wake people up to the fact that the entire universe is this subjective entity. It is not just this, like, empirical machine with interlocking gears and like this orderly machine that proceeds from just like the sum of its parts like no like we are literally the universe creating the universe and that's what spx is meant to wake people up to.” — Crypto Maxi 💹🧲

Tanz Cho 💹🧲

12,294 views • 2 months ago

Rick Rubin on being addicted to the miracle of creation: “I like the moment of revelation. So we're working on something and it's just okay. It's boring. I'd rather not be there. That's how it feels. But then something happens and it's like magic. Something appears. It's not like we made it. Something comes up in the process. It's conjured in the process. It’s like a miracle and that's the thing that's addictive. That feeling when it's like it's not good, it's not good, it's not good, it's not good. We try something and it doesn't work. Try something else and it doesn't work. But then all of the sudden what we're listening to is really cool. That's the [addictive] feeling, that moment of discovery where it goes from nothing to something really good. And then the whole rest of the process after that is protecting that because it's super delicate. When it happens it's like this miracle happened and this magic thing happened and now we have to protect it through the rest of the process to not ruin it. It's scary because you don't want it to end. You don't want it to stop because we know if it stops, we can't control it. We can't do it again. It's not like that. It's this moment in time where something magical happens. So we spend a lot of time waiting and I can't say that's fun. Waiting is not fun.”

Rick Rubin on being addicted to the miracle of creation: “I like the moment of revelation. So we're working on something and it's just okay. It's boring. I'd rather not be there. That's how it feels. But then something happens and it's like magic. Something appears. It's not like we made it. Something comes up in the process. It's conjured in the process. It’s like a miracle and that's the thing that's addictive. That feeling when it's like it's not good, it's not good, it's not good, it's not good. We try something and it doesn't work. Try something else and it doesn't work. But then all of the sudden what we're listening to is really cool. That's the [addictive] feeling, that moment of discovery where it goes from nothing to something really good. And then the whole rest of the process after that is protecting that because it's super delicate. When it happens it's like this miracle happened and this magic thing happened and now we have to protect it through the rest of the process to not ruin it. It's scary because you don't want it to end. You don't want it to stop because we know if it stops, we can't control it. We can't do it again. It's not like that. It's this moment in time where something magical happens. So we spend a lot of time waiting and I can't say that's fun. Waiting is not fun.”

David Senra

12,759 views • 4 months ago

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio: The end goal is obviously not just the end of the war, obviously that's essential and fundamental, but it's also about securing an end to the war that leaves Ukraine sovereign and independent and with an opportunity of real prosperity. So this is not just about peace deals, it's about creating a pathway forward that leaves Ukraine sovereign, independent, and prosperous.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio: The end goal is obviously not just the end of the war, obviously that's essential and fundamental, but it's also about securing an end to the war that leaves Ukraine sovereign and independent and with an opportunity of real prosperity. So this is not just about peace deals, it's about creating a pathway forward that leaves Ukraine sovereign, independent, and prosperous.

Anton Gerashchenko

1,152,641 views • 9 months ago

EVERYONE needs to be aware how SIGNIFICANT the Wisconsin Supreme Court election is This election decides who controls The House of Representatives and Voter ID Elon Musk “The single biggest challenge, I think is actually just making people aware that there is this very important election. There's both the very important election for Judge Schimel as well as the deciding on, on adding voter ID to the Wisconsin Constitution institution, which is very, very important. So it's quite shocking ,you can sort of tell where voter fraud is happening, where they ban id, you know, like why would you ban, ID like in New York and California, it's like illegal to show idea at an election. Well, why would, I can't imagine why that would be the case…. So, two really important things is to ensure judicial integrity on Tuesday and then the voter ID thing It's April Fool's Day. So I think most people aren't aware, like I said, most people aren't aware that there is this important election, but there most people don't even know that there's an election at all. Or if they do, they aren't sure exactly when and where it is. — They don't realize just how important it is. They think it, it's, well it's just, you know, some kind of judicial thing that's not that important. But it actually, what they're doing, what's happening on Tuesday is a vote for the, the which party controls the U.S house of House of Representatives. That is why it is so, so significant and whichever party controls the house, to a significant degree controls the country, which then steers the course of Western civilization. So it's like, I feel like this is one of those things that, that may not seem that it's gonna affect the entire destiny of humanity, — it's a super, it's a super big deal. The fact that I'm here in person, like I'm not phoning it in. I'm here in person”

EVERYONE needs to be aware how SIGNIFICANT the Wisconsin Supreme Court election is This election decides who controls The House of Representatives and Voter ID Elon Musk “The single biggest challenge, I think is actually just making people aware that there is this very important election. There's both the very important election for Judge Schimel as well as the deciding on, on adding voter ID to the Wisconsin Constitution institution, which is very, very important. So it's quite shocking ,you can sort of tell where voter fraud is happening, where they ban id, you know, like why would you ban, ID like in New York and California, it's like illegal to show idea at an election. Well, why would, I can't imagine why that would be the case…. So, two really important things is to ensure judicial integrity on Tuesday and then the voter ID thing It's April Fool's Day. So I think most people aren't aware, like I said, most people aren't aware that there is this important election, but there most people don't even know that there's an election at all. Or if they do, they aren't sure exactly when and where it is. — They don't realize just how important it is. They think it, it's, well it's just, you know, some kind of judicial thing that's not that important. But it actually, what they're doing, what's happening on Tuesday is a vote for the, the which party controls the U.S house of House of Representatives. That is why it is so, so significant and whichever party controls the house, to a significant degree controls the country, which then steers the course of Western civilization. So it's like, I feel like this is one of those things that, that may not seem that it's gonna affect the entire destiny of humanity, — it's a super, it's a super big deal. The fact that I'm here in person, like I'm not phoning it in. I'm here in person”

Wall Street Apes

51,280 views • 1 year ago

"I really enjoyed [the sprint], particularly at the beginning and then obviously less so towards the end. But it's great to see Ferrari in the top three and to be a part of that. It was the first time that I've been in that battle this year with George and unfortunately my left tyre gave up quite early. But it's good, it was a good experience. Not too much lost ground wise and we'll see what changes we can make now so that it's better for tomorrow."

"I really enjoyed [the sprint], particularly at the beginning and then obviously less so towards the end. But it's great to see Ferrari in the top three and to be a part of that. It was the first time that I've been in that battle this year with George and unfortunately my left tyre gave up quite early. But it's good, it was a good experience. Not too much lost ground wise and we'll see what changes we can make now so that it's better for tomorrow."

sim

265,101 views • 6 months ago

This is from today's #WCWS game. This was ruled a base hit when it happened (you can see the 'H' pop up), but was changed to a missed catch error by the first baseman at the bottom of the fourth. This is an impossible catch for the first baseman with a ball thrown from that angle, that hard. This throw has to be to the glove, and while it's not a wild throw, it's low enough that the first baseman cannot get her glove around it in time. This is where replay gets you in trouble. The slo-mo replay makes it look like it's a catchable ball, but it isn't. In real time, at live speed, this isn't an error. This isn't a missed catch or a drop. I was loving the call of a single, especially because it was the first hit, and then, when it was changed, it felt like it was to protect a no-hitter. Everything about this screams "above ordinary effort" ... I would have left this as a single.

This is from today's #WCWS game. This was ruled a base hit when it happened (you can see the 'H' pop up), but was changed to a missed catch error by the first baseman at the bottom of the fourth. This is an impossible catch for the first baseman with a ball thrown from that angle, that hard. This throw has to be to the glove, and while it's not a wild throw, it's low enough that the first baseman cannot get her glove around it in time. This is where replay gets you in trouble. The slo-mo replay makes it look like it's a catchable ball, but it isn't. In real time, at live speed, this isn't an error. This isn't a missed catch or a drop. I was loving the call of a single, especially because it was the first hit, and then, when it was changed, it felt like it was to protect a no-hitter. Everything about this screams "above ordinary effort" ... I would have left this as a single.

MLB Scoring Changes

30,825 views • 3 months ago

Warnock: "Iff you look at the sheer scale of the Trump/Vance regime's operation in Minneapolis, it's clear to me that part of what they're trying to do is overwhelm people, to weaponize despair, to convince the citizens that you don't have a voice, that you cannot make a difference. But the people in Minneapolis, in real time, even in this dark moment, are showing that that's not true, that that's among the lies that they are telling."

Warnock: "Iff you look at the sheer scale of the Trump/Vance regime's operation in Minneapolis, it's clear to me that part of what they're trying to do is overwhelm people, to weaponize despair, to convince the citizens that you don't have a voice, that you cannot make a difference. But the people in Minneapolis, in real time, even in this dark moment, are showing that that's not true, that that's among the lies that they are telling."

Aaron Rupar

64,204 views • 7 months ago

But I'm promoting 'reverse-colorism' against lightskin people for noticing this😂? Just like this man said, it is always the most lightest, racially ambigous people in that cult trying to spread the notion that 'Africans are not black', it's always THEM. What is up with that?

But I'm promoting 'reverse-colorism' against lightskin people for noticing this😂? Just like this man said, it is always the most lightest, racially ambigous people in that cult trying to spread the notion that 'Africans are not black', it's always THEM. What is up with that?

👑𝔸𝕤𝕙𝕒𝕟𝕥𝕚 𝔾𝕚𝕣𝕝𝕚𝕖🇬🇭

17,439 views • 1 month ago

"One of the things that happens at the end of civiIizations is that they become obsessed with gender." Why is that? "It seems to be that they're dissolving all boundaries, all norms, and all societal structure" 🚨🚨🚨 🔊 … is this really the direction we want to go? Is this the nearing the of ours?

"One of the things that happens at the end of civiIizations is that they become obsessed with gender." Why is that? "It seems to be that they're dissolving all boundaries, all norms, and all societal structure" 🚨🚨🚨 🔊 … is this really the direction we want to go? Is this the nearing the of ours?

Wall Street Mav

1,173,640 views • 3 years ago

it will be bad for Eben, and correctly so. reason is that he actually get his hands and fingers around the eye area of Alex Mann 4 different times. the clip below is not repeating footage , it is the sequence as it happened. you can see after the first eye contact , he follow it up with more hands at the eyes. so while he is maybe not "gouging" in the most hard core sense of it, there is clear intent to mess with Mann's eyes. yes people making the point that he was victim to the same thing at the previous ruck which is why he is doing this, but that is irelevant. Intentional contact with eyes ranges from 12 weeks (low end) to 18 weeks to 24 weeks (top end) very disappointing from him😢

it will be bad for Eben, and correctly so. reason is that he actually get his hands and fingers around the eye area of Alex Mann 4 different times. the clip below is not repeating footage , it is the sequence as it happened. you can see after the first eye contact , he follow it up with more hands at the eyes. so while he is maybe not "gouging" in the most hard core sense of it, there is clear intent to mess with Mann's eyes. yes people making the point that he was victim to the same thing at the previous ruck which is why he is doing this, but that is irelevant. Intentional contact with eyes ranges from 12 weeks (low end) to 18 weeks to 24 weeks (top end) very disappointing from him😢

Oom Rugby

207,369 views • 9 months ago