Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Really nice visual on what a week should cover from a strength, power & speed POV. Sprint every week, maybe twice. One massive issue in Gaelic Games now is too much weightlifting and bodybuilding. So you have lads walking around 5-8kg above the weight their top speed is and...

22,726 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

8 Yorum

Shane Rice profil fotoğrafı
Shane Rice1 yıl önce

As the years go on; I’m doing less and less lifting in the weights room & more on field prep work in the off season. One thing I’m focusing on more than ever now is extensive work through med balls & jumps, Periodization through accelerations & decels. An oldie but a goodie is skipping. Moving through different planes in resisted banded work, all on field. Hypertrophy has its place but never a priority, muscle will come through weights lifted but not sure teams realize that these new rules will bring an even bigger importance of S&C on grass.

Paul Kelly profil fotoğrafı
Paul Kelly1 yıl önce

This is a great post. You will want the genetics of Brian Fenton or Jack O shea on top of proper training. Will take a few years for sure. Maybe the 3 inside forwards will get away with the usual inter county style and build unless they are alternating to come in and out.

Paul Kelly profil fotoğrafı
Paul Kelly1 yıl önce

13kms is covering good ground in an hour without intermittent high speed bursts, taking hits and executing skills all together.

Kevin Mulcahy profil fotoğrafı
Kevin Mulcahy1 yıl önce

Have heard players told they will be expected to cover 14 and even 18k in games with the new rules by various managers. As if it’s all about volume. Some players may actually reduce overall volume but be more vulnerable to injury due to more and/or longer high intensity runs The lack of expertise coming through in GAA is depressing when we have an absolutely saturated ecology of sports scientists in all their various hue’s

Killian Lynch profil fotoğrafı
Killian Lynch1 yıl önce

Tempo running ( 70-80% speed) better than sprinting. Sprinting places a huge strain on the CNS (longer recovery times etc) and most runs in a Gaelic football game are at 3/4 rather than full speed anyway.

Kevin Mulcahy profil fotoğrafı
Kevin Mulcahy1 yıl önce

Both needed. Sprinting short necessary for acceleration and explosion. Long for hamstring robustness Tempo running would be 65-75% traditionally. But it’s better slower for more endurance types, faster for fast twitch types. I tend to stay below 70% Once you get beyond 75% you are going fast enough to switch on the nervous system significantly and that leads to fatigue or a lack of recovery. Tempos are very useful though, that’s for sure

Killian Lynch profil fotoğrafı
Killian Lynch1 yıl önce

Premier League soccer teams focus is now on core work (Salah as an example) and explosive speed development using weighted plyos etc. Gaelic football needs to take note.

Kevin Mulcahy profil fotoğrafı
Kevin Mulcahy1 yıl önce

Maybe after 3ish years of proper S&C. But Salah lifts heavy too. I agree though But we have to be really careful of over analysing freak athletes. Salah is an outlier, he is world class in the biggest sport in the world. 90% of his ability lies in genetic advantages of composition, highly tuned nervous system etc But I do think there is a shift needed. Some teams have it nailed. Armagh for instance have trimmed down in recent years, and it’s made a difference

Benzer Videolar

ABC’s George Stephanopoulos attempted to trip up Secretary of State Marco Rubio by asking the same question about Venezuela three different times. “What is the legal authority for the United States to be running Venezuela?” And three times, Rubio shut him down. RUBIO: “I explained to you what our goals are and how we’re going to use the leverage to make it happen.” “As far as our legal authority on the quarantine, simple. We have court orders. These are sanctioned boats, and we get orders from courts to go after and seize these sanctions. Is a court not a legal authority?” STEPHANOPOULOS: “Is the United States running Venezuela right now?” RUBIO: “Well, I’ve explained once again, I’ll do it one more time.” “What we are running is the direction this is going to move moving forward, and that is we have leverage.” “This leverage we are using and we intend to use. We started using already. You can see where they are running out of storage capacity. In a few weeks, they’re going to have to start pumping oil, unless they make changes.” “That leverage that we have with the armada of boats that are currently positioned, allow us to seize any sanctioned boats coming into or out of Venezuela loaded with oil or on its way in to pick up oil.” “We can pick and choose which ones we go after. We have court orders for each one.” “That will continue to be in place until the people who have control over the levers of power in that country make changes that are not just in the interest of the people of Venezuela but are in the interest of the United States and the things that we care about.” “The legal authority is the court orders that we have.”

Overton

213,086 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

VP VANCE PREDICTED: PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET ANGRY, AND RIGHTFULLY SO "This stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice. People are going to get angry, and rightfully so." If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so. If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so.

Svetlana Lokhova

254,325 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

YOKO ONO: ONOCHORD, VENICE, 2004 Yoko: The world is divided in two industries. One is the War Industry and the other is the Peace Industry. The people in the War Industry are totally together. They don't have to talk to each other, even. They know exactly what they want to do. They want to go out there, kill and make money. But the people in the Peace Industry, which are us - we are so idealistic that each one of us criticises the other Peace Person in the Peace Industry. And we are always just arguing and we are wasting our energies doing that. So let's just forgive each other and see that we are in the Peace Industry and that's all that counts. Even if you are not marching for peace, just be yourself, being a florist, being a merchant, being a talior, anything. That way you're contributing to the Peace Industry. People are just concentrating on fear, confusion and anger. And therefore just for a moment, I'd like us to think about Love. In a very magical, straight way, John and I met in London and from then on we stood for Peace and Love. And when I do this kind of event. Well it is... I was inspired to do it, but I still think that I'm still with John in spirit. John and I created the country called Nutopia. Not Utopia, because there was Utopia as a concept already. And we wanted to create a new concept, so we just added N on it - Nutopia - and as a country. Well, that is the concept of a country. And we all are citizens of that country. And in my apartment in the Dakota Building, we put a little plaque on the back door, the kitchen door. It says 'Nutopian Embassy' and even now we have that. (laughs). Nutopia exists in our minds. And because of that, some people want to rebel against it. The reason some want to rebel against it is a good proof that it exists. I think that it was a terrible thing that happened in Chechnya. But we have to still keep our hopes up. And instead of giving up, we have to keep on sending the message of Love to each other. You say that I am the Ambassador of Peace. We are all Ambassadors of Peace. You are too. Everybody in this room are Ambassadors of Peace. Just the fact that we are not participating in War. The fact that we are here, and we are what we are, means that we are in the Peace Industry. All of us. John and I used to say that our apartment in the Dakota is a conceptual monastry, just for the two of us. And when we go out of the Dakota, we get so many people communicating with us, so it's very important that we had silence and quietness. And my apartment is a very small space compared to the world. And I need that for my peace of mind. You should be kind to each other. You should come together, hug each other, love each other, express our love to each other and we should make it work. We should finally create a world that is a totally an Earth for Us. So let's do it. Yoko Ono, OpenAsia Press Conference, whilst exhibiting Onochord, 2004 by Yoko Ono (Nutopia) at the Venice Biennale: OpenAsia 2004, Lido Di Venezia, Venice, Italy, 9 September 2004.

Yoko Ono

35,208 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Dr P Arora (Pooja Arora) and I spoke about cancel culture and common knowledge, the topic of my new book: When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows . . . Me: Yeah, so cancel culture is one of the phenomena that has surrounded what’s sometimes called the Great Awokening. It’s a humorous term based on the Great Awakening, which was an era in American history where there was a huge multiplication of Protestant churches and of religious fervor in the 19th century. That was the Great Awakening, and so the joke is it’s the Great Awokening, probably starting maybe around 2014, but then it really exploded in 2020 in the United States with the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis. But anyway, cancel culture, which is not restricted to the left, to wokeism—and in fact, in the United States in the last year, we’ve seen an eruption of cancel culture from the populist MAGA Trumpian right, especially after the killing of Charlie Kirk—where the same things that were happening in woke culture, namely someone would have a tweet or a comment that seemed disrespectful of the dominant ideology, and they would get threatened, they would get censored, they would get fired. So in my book, When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows, one of the chapters is called The Cancelling Instinct. It’s a bit of a play on my book, The Language Instinct. It just asks the question: since it is not only the woke left, but it can also be the MAGA right—and to say nothing of the fascist right or the Nazi right—to repress speech, the question is why? Why do we feel the urge to shut up people we disagree with? Particularly since one of the principles of the Enlightenment, and of science and democracy, is that you need to have free speech, because none of us is infallible. The only way we make progress is that people—everyone—express an opinion; other people are free to criticize those opinions; and it is in the crucible of debate and criticism that we see which ideas are good, which ones are true, which ones are errors that we should discard. I suggest the reason that there is such an urge to cancel is that we all are—we live by moral norms, not just by laws where the police will arrest you and put you on trial and put you in jail if you break a law. And that happens. But we have many more norms of how we live our lives, where people don’t do something because, you know, everyone knows you don’t do it. Why does everyone know? Well, everyone knows that everyone else knows you don’t do it. You don’t walk around naked. You don’t eat mashed potatoes with your hands. You don’t insult people to their faces. You don’t point out—if someone is overweight or has a speech impediment—there are dozens of these norms. And some of the norms are: you don’t make racist comments. You don’t make comments that demean women or gay people. What upholds these norms? Common knowledge. They exist because everyone knows they exist, which means that if it appears that a norm is threatened—crucially, in a public arena where it could be common knowledge—then there is an urge to punish that person, but also publicly. That is, in an arena of common knowledge. That is where everyone can see the punishment, and everyone can see everyone else seeing the punishment. That’s what’s necessary to prop up a norm, and that, I think, gives rise to the urge to censor and cancel, often in highly public ways. Now, in the old days, it used to be that there were public hangings and public crucifixions and burnings at the stake. The electronic equivalent is the internet petition with 600 signatures or the social media shaming mob, but I think the underlying psychology is the same. Now, in some cases, this could be positive. That is, it really is good that we don’t insult each other to our faces, that we don’t tell racist jokes, which were very common when I grew up. On the other hand, in arenas like science, democracy, the rule of law, the truth is more important than social harmony, and the whole point of scholarship, academia, of science is that you find the truth even when the truth seems uncomfortable. And so cancel culture can get in the way of our collective effort to acquire knowledge.

Steven Pinker

63,433 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Buttigieg: It is not too much to ask that, in this country and in this state, one job ought to be enough, which means wages and benefits that make that possible. It’s not too much to ask that you ought to be able to afford to raise a family in this country—to put your kid in child care if you want, or stay home and take care of them yourselves if you want, or do some combination of that if you want—and still have it add up at the end of the month. It is not too much to ask that the wealthiest country in the world have the best health care in the world and that it have the best-funded public schools in the world. And it is not too much to ask that the largest corporations and wealthiest people in this country pay at least as much of their income and wealth in taxes as a schoolteacher, a bus driver, or a firefighter. It is not too much to ask for a different kind of politics, where you look at your leaders in action and actually feel your blood pressure come down a little bit instead of going through the roof. That is a reasonable thing to expect of our leaders. It is not too much to ask. We can do this. Most of us already want this. So the obvious question is: Why hasn’t it happened? And that’s where we’ve got to talk about the system that we’re living with, which, by the way, as a politician, they kind of tell you not to do. Consultants say, “Look, no one’s going to get too fired up about the details of our democratic system when they’re just trying to keep their heads above water in this economy,” which I get, and to some extent I agree. But the reason that so many things are wrong with our economic picture is that so many things are wrong with our political system. And we’ve gotten so used to it, we can forget that there was a time when our political system was the pride of this nation. Wars have been fought for our system, starting with the first one—the one that launched 250 years ago with the Declaration of Independence, the one that gave this nation its being. The Founders risked their lives for a better political system. So don’t tell me it can’t stir people’s hearts. Don’t tell me that it’s not worth fighting for. Especially because until we do something to change our political system, we will continue to suffer from an economic system that lets us down: monopolies squeezing families and farmers on both ends; consumers and workers caught up in a system that can’t serve them; small businesses swamped by the big guys. Right now, what’s at stake is nothing less than the American dream. It is endangered.

Acyn

40,695 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

Another day, another mass shooting with an AR-15. This is becoming too commonplace in America. This time at a Dollar General in Jacksonville, Florida. No, we don't need to "take your guns" in order to help stop this problem. As a nation we need to come to the table and agree to some common sense reforms. Yesterday, Tennessee Rep Justin Jones said: "We’ve spent the whole week here in special session and I’ve heard my Republican colleagues tell us that there is no issue of gun violence, and just making excuses. To be honest Jim, I’m frustrated, I’m emotional right now because America should be tired of this. "This is madness and we don’t have to live this way. And to see three precious black lives taken in a state where we have an asinine governor attacking black people — attacking black history — and then you have people making excuses, saying its not a gun issue when he had an AR-15. "I mean other nations have hate, but we’re the only that keeps having mass shootings because because of policy decisions. And we don’t have to live this way. We don’t have to live this way anymore. "Whether it’s a school in Nashville or whether it’s a Dollar General in Jacksonville, FL, this terrorism that we’re living under is a policy choice being made to appease extremists and the gun lobby. We need to call it out for what it is and we need to change this nation so that we can live free of this anxiety and terror and trauma." What do you think are some commonsense measures to help prevent this stuff from happening? Why can't we classify guns like the AR-15 in the same restricted categories as short-barreled rifles or automatic weapons? Even if it saves 1 life, wouldn't it be worth it?

Ed Krassenstein

1,220,439 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🛑 Breaking 🇧🇫- “The imperialists and their local valets sabotaged and destroyed everything that was in this factory.” - Captain Ibrahim Traore At the reopening of BRAFASO brewery, this is what Capitaine Ibrahim TRAORÉ was saying: “I think that it was some Burkinabè, some local valets who at some point in time were paid by the imperialists to sabotage and destroy everything that was here. So, in March 2024, when we tried to revitalize this unit, we have encountered a lot of suffering I must say. And even during the construction, it was a lot of struggles with the new equipment that we ordered to replace the old one. Some Burkinabè who applied to work at the reconstruction have again sabotaged the new equipment that had arrived. So, we had to take some specific security measures in order to achieve the result that you see. This is to say that it’s an industrial unit that is being fought by imperialism and their local valets. But we are resolutely committed to revive this unit, but also all the units that are struggling, because the industrialization of Burkina Faso like we said, we want it and we will do it, because it’s a big value chain that is produced here. Soon, maybe we will inaugurate another unit in Bobo Dioulasso that will produce semolinas and derivatives which will take into account raw materials of this industrial unit Many jobs will be created, and our corn that our valiant farmers are producing will be used. We will take all precautions so that what this unit and other units have gone through don’t face the same fate. That’s it! The people are expecting much in terms of industries, transportation of their raw materials. So, we will do all in our power so that the industrial units exist and survive for the happiness of our people.” The enemies of Africa are first and foremost Africans. I can’t emphasize this enough. After all, we have more to fear from within than from without. Again, for Africa to strive and prosper, we will have to deal with the issue of the sellouts. They are our greatest enemies from within.

Sy Marcus Herve Traore

63,177 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

8 million directors are currently being forced with One Login onto digital ID, and this is not something that's been discussed. And this is the problem with this government. It’s disregard and contempt for the public. The idea you don't need to put in a manifesto and argue and convince people what you're going to do, or even if you have done that, you'll just do a U-turn on it. And if you make promises like to the farmers, you'll just not do it and do a 180 on it. this is particularly true of things like facial ID They're saying it's not mandatory. But effectively if you've got 8 million directors that are being forced to do one login and then it's being used across the board with different agencies, effectively it becomes a thing that you need to do to participate, and a complete obsession with trying to follow what's happened in Australia and Europe's now pushing this as well. You get age gating on the internet, so we have to basically prove who we are to just participate in the digital public sphere. And that's why this, coming Saturday week, we've got, the Four Nations rally to scrap digital ID day, and we're saying it together. We must have a digital bill of rights. Just the fundamental thing. We must have the right not to have to digitally verify, not to have to digitally prove who we are to exist or to participate. There's over 3 million people who are older who don't, go online. But it shouldn't just be that or people who come up with vulnerabilities. These are choices, and we can't allow a situation that. But de facto, we're forced into doing this where we then see lots of surveillance, lots of control, and lots of data breaches. Mike. So this rally is going to be hugely important. Cities in the Four Nations, Belfast, city town hall outside that, outside Holyrood and Edinburgh, outside the Senedd in Cardiff and a really big rally at Trafalgar Square where we got speakers and performers It starts at 2:00. If people get there at 130, this is going to be a sending a message directly to Keir Starmer in this government and also to anyone else that, the May 7th elections, we've been going around the country saying that digital I.D. is a key part of these concerns. And we know people are concerned quite rightly, about potholes, low traffic, Low Traffic neighborhoods of which digital I.D. will be connected to. there's been a big populist uprising, which is very exciting. But we're saying that front and center people should keep putting pressure on, potential candidates. Standing on what? Their position on digital ideas. And it's so important they should make their vote on that. So we've been going around the country, we've got leaflets and fliers, Hundreds of thousands of fliers have gone out. We've got teams around Britain saying that 7th of May, let's make sure we take back democracy and put no digital I.D. at the heart of it. So this four rallies, the scrap digital I.D. rallies on the 25th Saturday, the 25th of April. we're going to continue, challenging, this and insisting on it. , there's going to be some more surprises over the next week and people are going to see much more about it, but we encourage everyone to make sure that they let their potential candidates know this is a crucial issue to them, and they'll be voting on this issue. #notodigitalid #together Mike Graham 🇬🇧

Alan D Miller

14,428 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce