Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Reasonable doubt didn’t just fade today—it got forensically annihilated. 🚗 Karen Read’s Lexus: ➡️ 74% throttle in reverse ➡️ 23.9 mph ➡️ 54 feet of force 🟥 Paint transfer = arm laceration match 🩸 Injuries = perfect alignment: hip, head, arm 📱 Timeline = synced to the second O’Keefe’s...

tonybpod's profile picture

Tony Brueski

3,239 subscribers

16,006 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von StopmakingupLies
StopmakingupLiesvor 1 Jahr

Lmao grifting hard Can you explain why the Medical Examiner doesn’t support his claims? Like how getting hit in the eye area at 20+. Mph by a spoiler caused only minor lacerations…? Also no substantial bruising to the arm that took the impact?

Profilbild von American Stories Network
American Stories Networkvor 1 Jahr

Adrenaline. Courage. Victory. 🏆 Experience the rush of Surviving Mann, where every moment counts. Follow for updates & airing times. #SurvivingMann #VictoryAwaits #NavySEALs #SpecOps #TacticalTraining

Profilbild von euro expat
euro expatvor 1 Jahr

@tonybpod Explain me this please : 1) A 6000+ Lb vehicle hitting a 220+ Lb body at 23.9 mph. Force at impact is huge. Broken bones, internal damages are inevitable. But, no broken bones and no severe internal organs trauma, which is impossible.

Profilbild von Neil Crowley
Neil Crowleyvor 1 Jahr

Jesus Christ, he literally proved nothing…. Held out his f**king arm at a few MPR … why didn’t he bring up the images of JOK injuries? Because he can’t explain them….

Profilbild von euro expat
euro expatvor 1 Jahr

@tonybpod 2) And if you clip a body at low speed, body is thrown just few ft, no severe injuries, no deep head trauma, but then, no tailight shattered in 47 pieces.

Profilbild von JT PHILLY
JT PHILLYvor 1 Jahr

Hahahah perfect alignment? What are you talking about? And there is no way he got those “cuts” from a fucking taillight you idiot!

Profilbild von Nick
Nickvor 1 Jahr

Didn’t he testify that he didn’t know exactly how John was positioned when he was struck several times? Then goes on to cosplay John in only one scenario that matches the CW’s “theory”? Does that not seem like confirmation bias? Which is really the under pinned problem with the CW’s case. From Proctor on up, only evidence that pointed to Karen was followed. This seems like performative theatre more than anything.

Profilbild von MrDNebula
MrDNebulavor 1 Jahr

Cross will be great. Your hopes will evaporate

Profilbild von bingbing
bingbingvor 1 Jahr

Wouldn’t that be considered first degree? It seems that with that kind oh acceleration, she intended to hit him. Pre-meditated?

Profilbild von euro expat
euro expatvor 1 Jahr

@tonybpod 3) in both options, either the car or the body do not match the scenario.

Profilbild von Shaquille O’Meal
Shaquille O’Mealvor 1 Jahr

Except the arm lacerations don’t match. Welcher had his arm at a 90* angle. In order for John to get his injuries, his arm would have had to be straight. The marks on the forearm would run elbow to wrist if the arm was bent.

Ähnliche Videos

📄 Legal & Constitutional Breakdown by explains rights and recourse… A woman stopped to record a crash involving an ICE vehicle. She stood still. An ICE agent approached, said “Have you not learned from the past couple of days” — referencing the Renée Good killing — then grabbed her phone. 🔴 What the Agent Did: 1. Threatening Language ➡️ Referencing a recent ICE killing while confronting a peaceful witness can be intimidation. ➡️ May qualify as a civil rights violation. 2. Grabbing Her Phone ➡️ Violates the Fourth Amendment: no warrant, no consent, no legal cause. ➡️ Recording in public is not grounds for seizure. ✅ What the Woman Did: • Recording agents in public is protected speech. • She was still, non-interfering, and lawful. • She had the right to remain and observe. 🛡️ What She Can Do Now: • File complaints with DHS Civil Rights and the Inspector General. • Consult a civil rights attorney — potential claims under §1983 or Bivens. • Demand return of phone/data via counsel. 📢 Recording is legal. Threats and seizures aren’t. Support accutare civic response & help defend against ICE: 🔗 #KnowYourRights #CivilRights #ICE #PAXISHolds
0:20

📄 Legal & Constitutional Breakdown by explains rights and recourse… A woman stopped to record a crash involving an ICE vehicle. She stood still. An ICE agent approached, said “Have you not learned from the past couple of days” — referencing the Renée Good killing — then grabbed her phone. 🔴 What the Agent Did: 1. Threatening Language ➡️ Referencing a recent ICE killing while confronting a peaceful witness can be intimidation. ➡️ May qualify as a civil rights violation. 2. Grabbing Her Phone ➡️ Violates the Fourth Amendment: no warrant, no consent, no legal cause. ➡️ Recording in public is not grounds for seizure. ✅ What the Woman Did: • Recording agents in public is protected speech. • She was still, non-interfering, and lawful. • She had the right to remain and observe. 🛡️ What She Can Do Now: • File complaints with DHS Civil Rights and the Inspector General. • Consult a civil rights attorney — potential claims under §1983 or Bivens. • Demand return of phone/data via counsel. 📢 Recording is legal. Threats and seizures aren’t. Support accutare civic response & help defend against ICE: 🔗 #KnowYourRights #CivilRights #ICE #PAXISHolds

Joe Walsh

30,421 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

For months, the prosecution has floated theories that John O’Keefe may have been struck by a vehicle, specifically Karen Read’s Lexus causing injuries as he allegedly stumbled and fell. But today, thanks to the defense entering X-rays into evidence, we now have hard proof that John O’Keefe had no fractures in his arm or hand. The X-rays do exist despite prosecution expert Dr. Welcher suggesting they didn’t. That means no defensive wounds, no impact trauma to the limbs and no car hit his arm. If Karen’s SUV struck O’Keefe as the Commonwealth claims with such force that it broke his skull and threw him then ask yourself this, Wouldn’t there be trauma to the arms or hands? Wouldn’t he try to break his fall? Brace? Shield himself? But nothing. No breaks. No fractures. Clean. Which leads to a simple, devastating possibility, If the car didn’t hit his arm… maybe the car didn’t hit him at all. And that’s exactly the doubt the defense is sowing not with theories, but with medical proof. The kind that doesn’t scream, shout, or lie it just sits there quietly... being true. Dr welcher replied WITH CAREFULLY HEDGED LANGUAGE HE DID NOT LIE. HE NEVER LOOKED!
1:54

For months, the prosecution has floated theories that John O’Keefe may have been struck by a vehicle, specifically Karen Read’s Lexus causing injuries as he allegedly stumbled and fell. But today, thanks to the defense entering X-rays into evidence, we now have hard proof that John O’Keefe had no fractures in his arm or hand. The X-rays do exist despite prosecution expert Dr. Welcher suggesting they didn’t. That means no defensive wounds, no impact trauma to the limbs and no car hit his arm. If Karen’s SUV struck O’Keefe as the Commonwealth claims with such force that it broke his skull and threw him then ask yourself this, Wouldn’t there be trauma to the arms or hands? Wouldn’t he try to break his fall? Brace? Shield himself? But nothing. No breaks. No fractures. Clean. Which leads to a simple, devastating possibility, If the car didn’t hit his arm… maybe the car didn’t hit him at all. And that’s exactly the doubt the defense is sowing not with theories, but with medical proof. The kind that doesn’t scream, shout, or lie it just sits there quietly... being true. Dr welcher replied WITH CAREFULLY HEDGED LANGUAGE HE DID NOT LIE. HE NEVER LOOKED!

Dixie Normus

45,002 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋
4:10

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋

BoozeyBeauty

114,191 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

KAREN READ: HER CRUMBLING CASTLE OF LIES AND WHY THE GARAGE LIE WON'T WORK During Read’s second trial, the defense began to float a theory that John O’Keefe was killed in the garage at 34 Fairview. This was a departure from their previous version of events wherein they claimed stair flight data on John’s phone proved he was in the house and had been killed in the basement, a claim Alan Jackson boldly stated on Nightline. To bolster this theory, Karen Read departed from her previous story of looking at her phone when John left the car, the story she told in that same episode of Nightline and changed it during her Dateline interview and stated she physically saw John go to the door of the home and “cross the threshold.” But as more evidence became available during the lead up to the second trial, it was clear this theory would no longer work. The high-quality location data on John’s phone showed he never left the flagpole area after he exited Read’s car, which is exactly where he was found early the next morning. The temperature readings on John’s showed the device never went from a cold environment to a warm environment, like entering a home. His health data only showed 36 steps indicating he hadn't walked far when he left the car. And so, in the weeks before the trial, Read and her team went to work concocting their new theory. They took the low-quality location data, the data generated when the cell phone signal weakens and expands and, in this case, included the very front of the house/garage area, and began to spin a tale that John was killed in the garage. They saturated social media with their new garage story, going so far as to take a picture of stain spilled on the garage floor and imply it was a blood stain. But the story doesn’t work. While the garage at 34 Fairview is attached to the house, there is no entry from the home into the garage or vice versa. One can only enter the garage from outside the house either by utilizing the overhead door or through use of an outdoor side door. Since Read has already claimed to have physically seen John cross the threshold of the home, this would mean John would have had to have gone into the home then would have been marched back out of the home by the "House defendants" with Chloe in tow to the garage, beaten by the group and attacked by Chloe in the garage, and then moved back to the flagpole area in less than a minute without registering any steps. There is zero evidence to support any of this occurred, and in fact, the data on John’s phone shows it is pure fiction. And it is absurd. The evolving theory Read and her team are spinning as well as its numerous machinations are the result of one thing: retrofitting the available evidence to create any scenario, no matter how implausible, to point the finger away from Read. Strange, as this is exactly what they have accused MSP and the witnesses of doing in Read’s civil suit. Imagine that. I guess the old saying is true, every accusation is a confession. Well, at least with Read it is. #karenreadlies #defendthetruth
1:54

KAREN READ: HER CRUMBLING CASTLE OF LIES AND WHY THE GARAGE LIE WON'T WORK During Read’s second trial, the defense began to float a theory that John O’Keefe was killed in the garage at 34 Fairview. This was a departure from their previous version of events wherein they claimed stair flight data on John’s phone proved he was in the house and had been killed in the basement, a claim Alan Jackson boldly stated on Nightline. To bolster this theory, Karen Read departed from her previous story of looking at her phone when John left the car, the story she told in that same episode of Nightline and changed it during her Dateline interview and stated she physically saw John go to the door of the home and “cross the threshold.” But as more evidence became available during the lead up to the second trial, it was clear this theory would no longer work. The high-quality location data on John’s phone showed he never left the flagpole area after he exited Read’s car, which is exactly where he was found early the next morning. The temperature readings on John’s showed the device never went from a cold environment to a warm environment, like entering a home. His health data only showed 36 steps indicating he hadn't walked far when he left the car. And so, in the weeks before the trial, Read and her team went to work concocting their new theory. They took the low-quality location data, the data generated when the cell phone signal weakens and expands and, in this case, included the very front of the house/garage area, and began to spin a tale that John was killed in the garage. They saturated social media with their new garage story, going so far as to take a picture of stain spilled on the garage floor and imply it was a blood stain. But the story doesn’t work. While the garage at 34 Fairview is attached to the house, there is no entry from the home into the garage or vice versa. One can only enter the garage from outside the house either by utilizing the overhead door or through use of an outdoor side door. Since Read has already claimed to have physically seen John cross the threshold of the home, this would mean John would have had to have gone into the home then would have been marched back out of the home by the "House defendants" with Chloe in tow to the garage, beaten by the group and attacked by Chloe in the garage, and then moved back to the flagpole area in less than a minute without registering any steps. There is zero evidence to support any of this occurred, and in fact, the data on John’s phone shows it is pure fiction. And it is absurd. The evolving theory Read and her team are spinning as well as its numerous machinations are the result of one thing: retrofitting the available evidence to create any scenario, no matter how implausible, to point the finger away from Read. Strange, as this is exactly what they have accused MSP and the witnesses of doing in Read’s civil suit. Imagine that. I guess the old saying is true, every accusation is a confession. Well, at least with Read it is. #karenreadlies #defendthetruth

Julie Carpenter

16,742 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

For anyone losing their minds claiming Karen Read "purposely factory reset her phone," or "Karen Read destroyed evidence during a lawful search and seizure", let’s revisit Brian Albert’s phone “upgrade.” On September 23, 2022, Brian Albert was served a preservation order by the Commonwealth for his cell phone used between January 28 – February 28, 2022, ordering him not to manipulate or destroy any electronic data on that device. ✨ The Commonwealth confirmed this preservation order was sent to Albert. ✨ See stipulation from Brian's testimony during trial 1. During cross-examination by Attorney Alan Jackson, after being reminded of the exact dates, Albert suddenly recalled the precise day he traded in his phone: September 22 - the day before the preservation order was issued. This "upgrade" date was never confirmed by any record. We have no evidence of when exactly Brian did this. Albert also testified that he later participated in a conference call with the DA’s Office, was reminded of the preservation order by ADA Adam Lally, and did not disclose that he was no longer in possession of the phone at issue. By contrast: 🔹️Karen Read was never served a preservation order. 🔹️Massachusetts State Police arrived unexpectedly with a search warrant for her phones. 🔹️She had no notice they were coming before they showed up or that they wanted her phones until they entered her home. 🔹️She was under no legal obligation to preserve her device ✨️before✨️ they showed and turned over both phones once the warrant was presented. Thus meaning ➡️ Karen Read did not destroy evidence as the police received the phones as-is once the warrants were served. If she had, it is with no doubt the DA's office would've charged her with a felony as she already had pending murders charges. It's important to note that Karen Read has never been charged, alleged or been alluded to by prosecutors that she had an intent to destroy any evidence. Brian Albert, on the other hand, was served a preservation order, confirmed by prosecutors, and seemingly did not abide by it. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. 🐥
3:23

For anyone losing their minds claiming Karen Read "purposely factory reset her phone," or "Karen Read destroyed evidence during a lawful search and seizure", let’s revisit Brian Albert’s phone “upgrade.” On September 23, 2022, Brian Albert was served a preservation order by the Commonwealth for his cell phone used between January 28 – February 28, 2022, ordering him not to manipulate or destroy any electronic data on that device. ✨ The Commonwealth confirmed this preservation order was sent to Albert. ✨ See stipulation from Brian's testimony during trial 1. During cross-examination by Attorney Alan Jackson, after being reminded of the exact dates, Albert suddenly recalled the precise day he traded in his phone: September 22 - the day before the preservation order was issued. This "upgrade" date was never confirmed by any record. We have no evidence of when exactly Brian did this. Albert also testified that he later participated in a conference call with the DA’s Office, was reminded of the preservation order by ADA Adam Lally, and did not disclose that he was no longer in possession of the phone at issue. By contrast: 🔹️Karen Read was never served a preservation order. 🔹️Massachusetts State Police arrived unexpectedly with a search warrant for her phones. 🔹️She had no notice they were coming before they showed up or that they wanted her phones until they entered her home. 🔹️She was under no legal obligation to preserve her device ✨️before✨️ they showed and turned over both phones once the warrant was presented. Thus meaning ➡️ Karen Read did not destroy evidence as the police received the phones as-is once the warrants were served. If she had, it is with no doubt the DA's office would've charged her with a felony as she already had pending murders charges. It's important to note that Karen Read has never been charged, alleged or been alluded to by prosecutors that she had an intent to destroy any evidence. Brian Albert, on the other hand, was served a preservation order, confirmed by prosecutors, and seemingly did not abide by it. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. 🐥

BoozeyBeauty

39,904 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Full Breakdown on this: "Key Cycle 1162-2" -Tech Stream data gathered from KRs Lexus shows a triggering event where the Lexus travels in reverse 62 Ft at 24.2 MPH. They claim this triggering event is when KR hits JOK. -Using tech stream data, along with data from the Lexus black box, Aperture (crash reconstruction experts) wrote a report. In the report they claim that based on information from the Lexus black box (the time Karen started her ignition) that the triggering event 1162-2 happened from 12:31:38-12:31:43. -This means that Aperture believes Karen Read struck JOK with her SUV sometime between 12:31:38-12:31:43. -On April 28th, Ian Whiffin testified for the CW. During his testimony he stated that JOKs phone data shows that from 12:31:56-12:32:16, JOK was interacting with his phone. He states that after 12:32:16, there is no more interactions between JOK & the phone. -When you compare the two reports, you see that 13 seconds AFTER Aperture claims JOK was struck (12:31:43), Whiffin claims JOK began interacting with his phone (12:31:56). -The medical examiner testified today that the blow to the back of JOKs head would have left him incapacitated. This means it would be IMPOSSIBLE for JOK to have been on his phone at 12:31:56 (Whiffin's report), based on the time of collision (12:31:43) from the crash reconstruction report (Aperture) -To remedy this massive problem for CW, Aperture decided to amend their report, in the middle of the trial. (May 8th) -They claim that the "clocks on JOKs iPhone and the Lexus are off" They state that JOKs iPhone "runs late" -AMAZINGLY, to remedy the issue between Whiffins testimony and their report, they decided "based on fixing the clock differences" that the NEW time that triggering event happened (the collision) was at 12:32:16. -THE EXACT TIME Whiffin stated JOKs iPhone stops recording apple health data and the last time the phone is interacted with. That is complete bullshit. -In the first trial, the time of collision based on THE EXACT SAME DATA, was said to be 12:45. Shockingly, after learning that Karen Read connected to JOKs wifi at 12:36 AM during the trial, the CW changed their time of the collision yet again, that time to 12:30. -Alessi already cross examined Ian Whiffin about this exact issue with the conflicting times between his report and Apertures. during this trial. On no planet should Bev allow this report to be amended and testified to. This is the bed they made and they have to lay in it. If she allows a change, the defense should immediately move for a mistrial. -When you're trying to make up a story, this is what happens. You make it up as you go and are constantly chasing your tail. This is corruption playing out for the world to see.
0:58

Full Breakdown on this: "Key Cycle 1162-2" -Tech Stream data gathered from KRs Lexus shows a triggering event where the Lexus travels in reverse 62 Ft at 24.2 MPH. They claim this triggering event is when KR hits JOK. -Using tech stream data, along with data from the Lexus black box, Aperture (crash reconstruction experts) wrote a report. In the report they claim that based on information from the Lexus black box (the time Karen started her ignition) that the triggering event 1162-2 happened from 12:31:38-12:31:43. -This means that Aperture believes Karen Read struck JOK with her SUV sometime between 12:31:38-12:31:43. -On April 28th, Ian Whiffin testified for the CW. During his testimony he stated that JOKs phone data shows that from 12:31:56-12:32:16, JOK was interacting with his phone. He states that after 12:32:16, there is no more interactions between JOK & the phone. -When you compare the two reports, you see that 13 seconds AFTER Aperture claims JOK was struck (12:31:43), Whiffin claims JOK began interacting with his phone (12:31:56). -The medical examiner testified today that the blow to the back of JOKs head would have left him incapacitated. This means it would be IMPOSSIBLE for JOK to have been on his phone at 12:31:56 (Whiffin's report), based on the time of collision (12:31:43) from the crash reconstruction report (Aperture) -To remedy this massive problem for CW, Aperture decided to amend their report, in the middle of the trial. (May 8th) -They claim that the "clocks on JOKs iPhone and the Lexus are off" They state that JOKs iPhone "runs late" -AMAZINGLY, to remedy the issue between Whiffins testimony and their report, they decided "based on fixing the clock differences" that the NEW time that triggering event happened (the collision) was at 12:32:16. -THE EXACT TIME Whiffin stated JOKs iPhone stops recording apple health data and the last time the phone is interacted with. That is complete bullshit. -In the first trial, the time of collision based on THE EXACT SAME DATA, was said to be 12:45. Shockingly, after learning that Karen Read connected to JOKs wifi at 12:36 AM during the trial, the CW changed their time of the collision yet again, that time to 12:30. -Alessi already cross examined Ian Whiffin about this exact issue with the conflicting times between his report and Apertures. during this trial. On no planet should Bev allow this report to be amended and testified to. This is the bed they made and they have to lay in it. If she allows a change, the defense should immediately move for a mistrial. -When you're trying to make up a story, this is what happens. You make it up as you go and are constantly chasing your tail. This is corruption playing out for the world to see.

Joe TurtleHead

187,419 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

On 1/24/24, Det. Lt. Brian Tully and Lt. John Fanning of the Massachusetts State Police seized two cell phones from Karen Read. Except… when they attempted to check the phones, at least one appeared to be brand new or factory reset. 💀 Newly released body-worn camera footage (via LTL Media) shows exactly how this unfolded and it’s not favorable to the Commonwealth. Tully first attempts to call the phone he seized which goes straight to voicemail. Fanning then suggests trying the phone he seized. When Tully calls it, Fanning holds the device up. On camera we see the Apple “Hello” setup screen appear. 😂 That screen is standard for new or fully factory-reset iPhones. This detail matters as it helps explain why the grand jury may have declined to indict Karen Read on witness-intimidation charges. There was simply no recoverable digital evidence to support the allegation. We also know the Norfolk County DA’s Office never attempted a Cellebrite extraction on either phone. On modern iPhones, a completed factory reset destroys encryption keys. ➡️ User data is unrecoverable: no texts, no photos, no call logs, no app data. For those that may claim a pre-seizure reset is “illegal”... 💥news flash💥 - it’s not. At that point, there was: 🔹 No forensic preservation order 🔹 No explicit instruction not to reset 🔹 No warrant yet executed If a reset is completed before seizure, investigators inherit the phone as-is. Prosecutors would have to prove intent to destroy evidence, and that’s something they have never alleged, charged, or proven since January 2024. Is this why no extraction was ever attempted? By not running Cellebrite, the Commonwealth avoids generating a report that would confirm the reset timing, the lack of recoverable data and the futility of the seizure. Instead, they retain the phones, preserving ambiguity. 🙄 At this point, holding onto those devices looks less like evidence handling and more like control. And ambiguity, apparently, is the last leverage they have left. “Good luck… you’re going to need it.”
2:42

On 1/24/24, Det. Lt. Brian Tully and Lt. John Fanning of the Massachusetts State Police seized two cell phones from Karen Read. Except… when they attempted to check the phones, at least one appeared to be brand new or factory reset. 💀 Newly released body-worn camera footage (via LTL Media) shows exactly how this unfolded and it’s not favorable to the Commonwealth. Tully first attempts to call the phone he seized which goes straight to voicemail. Fanning then suggests trying the phone he seized. When Tully calls it, Fanning holds the device up. On camera we see the Apple “Hello” setup screen appear. 😂 That screen is standard for new or fully factory-reset iPhones. This detail matters as it helps explain why the grand jury may have declined to indict Karen Read on witness-intimidation charges. There was simply no recoverable digital evidence to support the allegation. We also know the Norfolk County DA’s Office never attempted a Cellebrite extraction on either phone. On modern iPhones, a completed factory reset destroys encryption keys. ➡️ User data is unrecoverable: no texts, no photos, no call logs, no app data. For those that may claim a pre-seizure reset is “illegal”... 💥news flash💥 - it’s not. At that point, there was: 🔹 No forensic preservation order 🔹 No explicit instruction not to reset 🔹 No warrant yet executed If a reset is completed before seizure, investigators inherit the phone as-is. Prosecutors would have to prove intent to destroy evidence, and that’s something they have never alleged, charged, or proven since January 2024. Is this why no extraction was ever attempted? By not running Cellebrite, the Commonwealth avoids generating a report that would confirm the reset timing, the lack of recoverable data and the futility of the seizure. Instead, they retain the phones, preserving ambiguity. 🙄 At this point, holding onto those devices looks less like evidence handling and more like control. And ambiguity, apparently, is the last leverage they have left. “Good luck… you’re going to need it.”

BoozeyBeauty

65,805 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Karen Read: The Tail-Light Truth and the Death of Reason Karen Read didn’t just hit John O’Keefe—she rewrote the definition of “caught red-handed,” only in this case, it’s red plastic. The kind that shattered from her Lexus and ended up embedded in his clothes and sprinkled around his lifeless body like murderous confetti. But sure, Karen, tell us again about the magical invisible snowplow and the ghost dog that grazes but never bites. Let’s talk actual evidence, not the Facebook fever dreams of Turtleboy disciples: •John stops moving within a minute of getting out of her car. Literally. One minute. He steps out, and the clock stops—on his life, and on Karen’s credibility. His phone temp immediately starts dropping. •Her car impacts something—hard. TechStream data logs it. Her taillight shatters. John’s injuries match it like a deranged game of forensic bingo. •She starts calling and texting him immediately, not with concern, but with rage. “I hate you.” She sounds less like a worried girlfriend and more like a Jodie Arias on a bender with a vendetta. •She claims she thought he went inside. Cute story—except she never told anyone until dateline a year and a half later. The morning she starts driving around like a Roomba on a revenge mission. •The backup camera. A full-color, widescreen display. You could see the curvature of the Earth in that thing. Yet she accidentally backs into the man she “loves”? Girl, please. Helen Keller would’ve noticed something was behind her with all the bells and whistles. •She woke the niece. Said “I might’ve done something.” Not “that bastard is cheating”. Not “he must’ve crashed on someone’s couch.” That’s not the vocabulary of an innocent woman—it’s the language of someone whose conscience just tapped her on the shoulder and screamed. And don’t forget the pièce de résistance: She calls Kerry, she throws in the towel and essentially decides, “Eh, guess he’s dead.” Because nothing screams innocent like abandoning your unconscious boyfriend in a snowbank like last season’s Christmas tree. Karen Read’s defense isn’t a theory—it’s a rotating buffet of delusions. First it was the Alberts. Then the McCabes. Then Higgins. Now it’s the Deep State, the Weather Channel, and maybe Big Pharma. Anyone but Karen. But the facts don’t care about her Vodka-fueled fan fiction. The evidence lines up like a police escort to prison: •Taillight broken. •Backup camera she definitely saw. •TechStream confirming the impact. •GPS confirming he never made it inside. •Her own mouth confirming she hit him. •Forensics confirming it wasn’t a fight. This isn’t just second-degree murder. It’s second-degree obvious. She didn’t “lose him in the snow.” She put him there. And every lie she’s told since is just a desperate attempt to keep her cocktail privileges. Karen Read isn’t on trial because she’s being framed. She’s on trial because she did it—and the snow isn’t the only thing that’s white and full of crap. #FreeKarenRead
1:25

Karen Read: The Tail-Light Truth and the Death of Reason Karen Read didn’t just hit John O’Keefe—she rewrote the definition of “caught red-handed,” only in this case, it’s red plastic. The kind that shattered from her Lexus and ended up embedded in his clothes and sprinkled around his lifeless body like murderous confetti. But sure, Karen, tell us again about the magical invisible snowplow and the ghost dog that grazes but never bites. Let’s talk actual evidence, not the Facebook fever dreams of Turtleboy disciples: •John stops moving within a minute of getting out of her car. Literally. One minute. He steps out, and the clock stops—on his life, and on Karen’s credibility. His phone temp immediately starts dropping. •Her car impacts something—hard. TechStream data logs it. Her taillight shatters. John’s injuries match it like a deranged game of forensic bingo. •She starts calling and texting him immediately, not with concern, but with rage. “I hate you.” She sounds less like a worried girlfriend and more like a Jodie Arias on a bender with a vendetta. •She claims she thought he went inside. Cute story—except she never told anyone until dateline a year and a half later. The morning she starts driving around like a Roomba on a revenge mission. •The backup camera. A full-color, widescreen display. You could see the curvature of the Earth in that thing. Yet she accidentally backs into the man she “loves”? Girl, please. Helen Keller would’ve noticed something was behind her with all the bells and whistles. •She woke the niece. Said “I might’ve done something.” Not “that bastard is cheating”. Not “he must’ve crashed on someone’s couch.” That’s not the vocabulary of an innocent woman—it’s the language of someone whose conscience just tapped her on the shoulder and screamed. And don’t forget the pièce de résistance: She calls Kerry, she throws in the towel and essentially decides, “Eh, guess he’s dead.” Because nothing screams innocent like abandoning your unconscious boyfriend in a snowbank like last season’s Christmas tree. Karen Read’s defense isn’t a theory—it’s a rotating buffet of delusions. First it was the Alberts. Then the McCabes. Then Higgins. Now it’s the Deep State, the Weather Channel, and maybe Big Pharma. Anyone but Karen. But the facts don’t care about her Vodka-fueled fan fiction. The evidence lines up like a police escort to prison: •Taillight broken. •Backup camera she definitely saw. •TechStream confirming the impact. •GPS confirming he never made it inside. •Her own mouth confirming she hit him. •Forensics confirming it wasn’t a fight. This isn’t just second-degree murder. It’s second-degree obvious. She didn’t “lose him in the snow.” She put him there. And every lie she’s told since is just a desperate attempt to keep her cocktail privileges. Karen Read isn’t on trial because she’s being framed. She’s on trial because she did it—and the snow isn’t the only thing that’s white and full of crap. #FreeKarenRead

MEDIA AUTOPSY

67,218 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Hotel front desk worker empties the entire safe and rushes all the cash to a Bitcoin machine… because of one phone call?! 🏨 This General Manager shows up at the hotel around 7 o’clock to relieve the front desk worker, Kiki. She walks in and immediately notices something’s off — the phone is completely off the hook with a guest on hold for over 25 minutes. No one’s at the desk. She starts looking for Kiki… and she’s just gone. Vanished. A hour and a half later Kiki finally comes back. The GM asks what on earth happened, and Kiki says she’s been on the phone the whole time with “Willie” — the owner and CEO of the hotel — talking on speakerphone. She was convinced it was a real emergency. The caller told her to take every single dollar out of the cash drawer and clean out the entire safe, then rush it straight to a Bitcoin machine. And that’s exactly what she did. The GM is standing there in total shock as Kiki explains it all like it makes perfect sense. These scammers really know how to get in someone’s head. (Part 2 dropping in about an hour — I’ll quote this post with it as soon as I’m ready!)
2:54

Hotel front desk worker empties the entire safe and rushes all the cash to a Bitcoin machine… because of one phone call?! 🏨 This General Manager shows up at the hotel around 7 o’clock to relieve the front desk worker, Kiki. She walks in and immediately notices something’s off — the phone is completely off the hook with a guest on hold for over 25 minutes. No one’s at the desk. She starts looking for Kiki… and she’s just gone. Vanished. A hour and a half later Kiki finally comes back. The GM asks what on earth happened, and Kiki says she’s been on the phone the whole time with “Willie” — the owner and CEO of the hotel — talking on speakerphone. She was convinced it was a real emergency. The caller told her to take every single dollar out of the cash drawer and clean out the entire safe, then rush it straight to a Bitcoin machine. And that’s exactly what she did. The GM is standing there in total shock as Kiki explains it all like it makes perfect sense. These scammers really know how to get in someone’s head. (Part 2 dropping in about an hour — I’ll quote this post with it as soon as I’m ready!)

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

106,488 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Great summary here of the ongoing situation involving Lindsey Gaetani (Lindsey Gaetani) and her efforts to (by herself) file a motion in court (that was thwarted by either Brian Tully, Pam Friedman or Jen McCabe's cousin). FULL TRANSCRIPT; Alright, so let's get right into this one. Today we're unpacking a really intense and personal story from Lindsey Gaetani. It's a story that involves a major court case, a huge data leak, and a truly bizarre and frankly shocking confrontation that she says went down inside a public courthouse. And it all kicks off with one jarring sentence. "I thought I just told you that you had to wait for Pam [Friedman]." I mean, can you imagine you walk into a public building trying to file a legal document and you're met with that? According to Lindsey Gaetani, this is exactly what a court clerk said. It's a statement that immediately set the tone for a pretty unbelievable standoff. And yeah, that's the big question here, isn't it? What on earth could lead to a situation where a citizen is apparently being barred from entering a courthouse by the very clerks who are supposed to work there for the public? We're going to piece together all the events just as Gaetani tells them to figure out how she got here. Okay, so let's jump right into the deep end to the most dramatic point in this story. Gaetani showing up at the Norfolk Superior Courthouse for a really critical hearing. She was there to file a motion, which is basically a formal request to the judge to protect her own private data because she felt like she had no one else to turn to. The first thing she does, she says, is call her state-appointed advocate, a woman named Pamela Friedman. But instead of getting help, she says Pam actually tried to stall her, telling her to just wait outside. You know, which is kind of strange, right? Especially given how urgent this all felt to her. So Gaetani decides, forget this, I'm calling the clerk's office myself. And that's when things get even weirder. She says she was told flat out that she was not allowed in the building without her advocate. And to her, this made absolutely no sense. I mean, any citizen should have the right to walk into a public courthouse and file a piece of paper. So here's how this whole thing just explodes. Gaetani goes inside anyway, a clerk immediately confronts her repeating that she was told to wait for Pam. Gaetani just says, I'm coming in and asks if they're refusing to take her motion. When they say yes, that's the tipping point. She pulls out her phone and says, okay, I'm recording this. And that's when she claims one of the clerks charges at her and starts screaming for security. A scene like that, it doesn't just happen in a vacuum, right? There's a reason for it. To really get the stakes here and to understand why Gaetani felt so desperate that day, we've got to rewind. We have to look at what triggered this whole chain of events in the first place. And it all comes down to a massive data leak. So what's this all about? At the heart of everything is the release of Gaetani's personal phone data. And we're not talking about a few text messages. We're talking about a complete extraction of her entire digital life. And when I say massive, I mean, it's hard to even wrap your head around. But it boils down to this one number. That's right, 15, 15 years of her life completely unredacted taken from her phone and handed over to the defense team in a case where she was a key witness. 15 years. And look, we're not just talking about old text messages here. This is the stuff you don't want anyone to see: medical records, social security numbers, private conversations she had with her lawyers, even bank passwords and her kids' birth certificates. It was just as she puts it, her entire life completely exposed. But you know what the real kicker was for her? It wasn't just that it happened, but how it happened. She claims she was specifically promised that this kind of private information would be protected. So you can imagine the shock, the disbelief when she found out the leak came from the Commonwealth itself, the very people she thought had her back. So what do you do when the system meant to protect you is the one that throws you to the wolves? Well, according to Gaetani, what came next was just a series of broken promises, and a whole lot of nothing. This is what she says the special prosecutor Ken Mello told her. Right in the middle of this crisis, he apparently promised he would file a protective order—that's a legal move to get her data back—and then he would fix it. And for a second, she probably felt a little relief, like, okay, someone's finally going to help me. But that relief, it was short-lived. The next day came and went, and then a few more days, and then weeks started to pass, and still nothing. No protective order was ever filed. All of her most private data was just out there. And the help she was promised never came. So you can see how this played out, according to her. Mello makes this big promise on day one. Then all she's told to do is make a list of everything sensitive on her phone. But as the weeks drag on, nothing gets filed. And then she gets the final blow. She's told Mello was sick, and he's off the case. And just like that, she was completely on her own. And that's what brings motion in hand to that courthouse. Okay, so let's jump back to that day at the courthouse. The scene in the clerk's office has just gone down, security has been called, and Gaetani is, as you can imagine, a complete mess. Then a court officer steps in, and she says he was incredibly kind. He actually calms her down. He listens to her, and he somehow manages to get her a spot to talk to the judge, Judge Rayburn, at a sidebar during the hearing. It finally seems like she's going to get her chance to explain everything. But the second she gets up there, before she can say a single word about her data or her motion, she says the judge just lays into her. This quote, she claims, is the very first thing Judge Rayburn said to her: Taking the clerk's side of the story as pure fact. And you can just imagine how that must have felt. Completely blindsided. Defeated. I mean, how do you even begin to argue with the judge? How do you prove that the clerks, people the judge works with day in and day out, were, from your point of view, not telling the truth? She says she felt like she had no choice but to just stand there and take it. So let's just recap the outcome here, from her point of view. It was a total disaster. Her whole goal was to get a protective order and get her data back. The ruling was that the defense could keep it. Her goal was to be heard as a witness trying to protect her own privacy. The outcome was her getting reprimanded for what happened in the clerk's office. She went in looking for protection and walked out feeling like she was the one who did something wrong. You'd think that would be the end of it, right? But nope. This is where the story takes another really strange turn that just raises a whole new set of questions about what was going on behind the scenes. So sometime later, she gets this phone call out of the blue from someone named Kate Peter. And during their conversation, Kate casually mentions that she heard something had happened down in the clerk's office that day. And that's the million-dollar question, isn't it? Lindsey is absolutely certain that the courthouse foyer was empty. The only people who saw what went down were her and the clerks. So how in the world could Kate know any of the details? Well, the answer Kate apparently gave her is just wow. She says that Jen McCabe has a cousin who works as a clerk right there in that specific office. Okay, so get this. Lindsey says she brings this up publicly. And remember, Jen McCabe is a central witness in the big case. And McCabe denies it, says she doesn't have a cousin there. Who this leaves Lindsey with two possible trails for how the story got out. Theory A, Kate was telling the truth. And the story went from a clerk to her cousin Jen McCabe and then to Kate. Or Theory B, the clerks told the advocate Pam Friedman, who then told Detective Brian Tully, who then told Jen McCabe. Either way you slice it, in her mind, the information leak points right back to official channels. And that's where her story leaves us. With this one final pretty explosive call to action, her whole account just leaves you with these profound questions about privacy, about power, and about the real inner workings of our justice system. And it really makes you wonder, just how deep does this whole thing go?
7:33

Great summary here of the ongoing situation involving Lindsey Gaetani (Lindsey Gaetani) and her efforts to (by herself) file a motion in court (that was thwarted by either Brian Tully, Pam Friedman or Jen McCabe's cousin). FULL TRANSCRIPT; Alright, so let's get right into this one. Today we're unpacking a really intense and personal story from Lindsey Gaetani. It's a story that involves a major court case, a huge data leak, and a truly bizarre and frankly shocking confrontation that she says went down inside a public courthouse. And it all kicks off with one jarring sentence. "I thought I just told you that you had to wait for Pam [Friedman]." I mean, can you imagine you walk into a public building trying to file a legal document and you're met with that? According to Lindsey Gaetani, this is exactly what a court clerk said. It's a statement that immediately set the tone for a pretty unbelievable standoff. And yeah, that's the big question here, isn't it? What on earth could lead to a situation where a citizen is apparently being barred from entering a courthouse by the very clerks who are supposed to work there for the public? We're going to piece together all the events just as Gaetani tells them to figure out how she got here. Okay, so let's jump right into the deep end to the most dramatic point in this story. Gaetani showing up at the Norfolk Superior Courthouse for a really critical hearing. She was there to file a motion, which is basically a formal request to the judge to protect her own private data because she felt like she had no one else to turn to. The first thing she does, she says, is call her state-appointed advocate, a woman named Pamela Friedman. But instead of getting help, she says Pam actually tried to stall her, telling her to just wait outside. You know, which is kind of strange, right? Especially given how urgent this all felt to her. So Gaetani decides, forget this, I'm calling the clerk's office myself. And that's when things get even weirder. She says she was told flat out that she was not allowed in the building without her advocate. And to her, this made absolutely no sense. I mean, any citizen should have the right to walk into a public courthouse and file a piece of paper. So here's how this whole thing just explodes. Gaetani goes inside anyway, a clerk immediately confronts her repeating that she was told to wait for Pam. Gaetani just says, I'm coming in and asks if they're refusing to take her motion. When they say yes, that's the tipping point. She pulls out her phone and says, okay, I'm recording this. And that's when she claims one of the clerks charges at her and starts screaming for security. A scene like that, it doesn't just happen in a vacuum, right? There's a reason for it. To really get the stakes here and to understand why Gaetani felt so desperate that day, we've got to rewind. We have to look at what triggered this whole chain of events in the first place. And it all comes down to a massive data leak. So what's this all about? At the heart of everything is the release of Gaetani's personal phone data. And we're not talking about a few text messages. We're talking about a complete extraction of her entire digital life. And when I say massive, I mean, it's hard to even wrap your head around. But it boils down to this one number. That's right, 15, 15 years of her life completely unredacted taken from her phone and handed over to the defense team in a case where she was a key witness. 15 years. And look, we're not just talking about old text messages here. This is the stuff you don't want anyone to see: medical records, social security numbers, private conversations she had with her lawyers, even bank passwords and her kids' birth certificates. It was just as she puts it, her entire life completely exposed. But you know what the real kicker was for her? It wasn't just that it happened, but how it happened. She claims she was specifically promised that this kind of private information would be protected. So you can imagine the shock, the disbelief when she found out the leak came from the Commonwealth itself, the very people she thought had her back. So what do you do when the system meant to protect you is the one that throws you to the wolves? Well, according to Gaetani, what came next was just a series of broken promises, and a whole lot of nothing. This is what she says the special prosecutor Ken Mello told her. Right in the middle of this crisis, he apparently promised he would file a protective order—that's a legal move to get her data back—and then he would fix it. And for a second, she probably felt a little relief, like, okay, someone's finally going to help me. But that relief, it was short-lived. The next day came and went, and then a few more days, and then weeks started to pass, and still nothing. No protective order was ever filed. All of her most private data was just out there. And the help she was promised never came. So you can see how this played out, according to her. Mello makes this big promise on day one. Then all she's told to do is make a list of everything sensitive on her phone. But as the weeks drag on, nothing gets filed. And then she gets the final blow. She's told Mello was sick, and he's off the case. And just like that, she was completely on her own. And that's what brings motion in hand to that courthouse. Okay, so let's jump back to that day at the courthouse. The scene in the clerk's office has just gone down, security has been called, and Gaetani is, as you can imagine, a complete mess. Then a court officer steps in, and she says he was incredibly kind. He actually calms her down. He listens to her, and he somehow manages to get her a spot to talk to the judge, Judge Rayburn, at a sidebar during the hearing. It finally seems like she's going to get her chance to explain everything. But the second she gets up there, before she can say a single word about her data or her motion, she says the judge just lays into her. This quote, she claims, is the very first thing Judge Rayburn said to her: Taking the clerk's side of the story as pure fact. And you can just imagine how that must have felt. Completely blindsided. Defeated. I mean, how do you even begin to argue with the judge? How do you prove that the clerks, people the judge works with day in and day out, were, from your point of view, not telling the truth? She says she felt like she had no choice but to just stand there and take it. So let's just recap the outcome here, from her point of view. It was a total disaster. Her whole goal was to get a protective order and get her data back. The ruling was that the defense could keep it. Her goal was to be heard as a witness trying to protect her own privacy. The outcome was her getting reprimanded for what happened in the clerk's office. She went in looking for protection and walked out feeling like she was the one who did something wrong. You'd think that would be the end of it, right? But nope. This is where the story takes another really strange turn that just raises a whole new set of questions about what was going on behind the scenes. So sometime later, she gets this phone call out of the blue from someone named Kate Peter. And during their conversation, Kate casually mentions that she heard something had happened down in the clerk's office that day. And that's the million-dollar question, isn't it? Lindsey is absolutely certain that the courthouse foyer was empty. The only people who saw what went down were her and the clerks. So how in the world could Kate know any of the details? Well, the answer Kate apparently gave her is just wow. She says that Jen McCabe has a cousin who works as a clerk right there in that specific office. Okay, so get this. Lindsey says she brings this up publicly. And remember, Jen McCabe is a central witness in the big case. And McCabe denies it, says she doesn't have a cousin there. Who this leaves Lindsey with two possible trails for how the story got out. Theory A, Kate was telling the truth. And the story went from a clerk to her cousin Jen McCabe and then to Kate. Or Theory B, the clerks told the advocate Pam Friedman, who then told Detective Brian Tully, who then told Jen McCabe. Either way you slice it, in her mind, the information leak points right back to official channels. And that's where her story leaves us. With this one final pretty explosive call to action, her whole account just leaves you with these profound questions about privacy, about power, and about the real inner workings of our justice system. And it really makes you wonder, just how deep does this whole thing go?

Grant Smith Ellis

14,147 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

If Lead Investigator Michael Proctor is depraved enough to unlawfully search #KarenRead’s cellphone for nude photographs of her on January 29, 2022, then what’s not to say he wouldn’t delete the Ring cam videos that subsequently went missing, too? FACT: Both the videos in the Ring cam system & the photographs on Karen Read’s cellphone were accessed unlawfully, without search warrants, by Michael Proctor. Proctor also hid his conflict, failed to recuse himself & then lied for the next 2 years, steadfastly defending the falsehood that he wasn’t lifelong family friends with the Albert’s & McCabe’s. We now know that was a lie. But here’s the thing: Karen immediately turned over her cellphone to Trooper Proctor. So if there’s evidence that Ring cam videos were deleted from her cellphone after Michael Proctor seized it, then it’d be pretty damning proof that he deleted the videos. —————— How did Proctor access Karen Read’s cellphone so quickly, on day 1, when he was searching it for nude photos of her? Fully cooperative & eager to help in the investigation, Karen Read promptly accessed her cellphone in front of investigators to provide them with the contact info of everyone who was present the night before with her & John. Notably, Karen Read voluntarily turned her cellphone over to investigators, without a search warrant, when she was FIRST able to speak with them. These are the actions of an honest & forthcoming witness. Not a murderer. —————— The Commonwealth tells on itself, revealing just how Proctor accessed her cellphone without a search warrant (below) in its own filings: “The troopers further asked the defendant for contact information relating to the people she had indicated were present at the bars. The defendant obliged, and prior to providing said information, the troopers observed the defendant to enter a numerical passcode into her phone to unlock it, prior to retrieving said data.” —————— If Proctor preyed upon Karen Read’s trust by secretly watching her enter her passcode to unlock her cellphone, and remembering it for later so he could go through her phone, without a search warrant, looking for nude photos & other things unrelated to the investigation, then we already know he’s perfectly willing to unlawfully access things on her cellphone for nefarious purposes. If Karen had the Ring app on her cellphone, what’s not to say Proctor didn’t access it to delete videos? Ask yourself this: If Karen Read were guilty, would she be asking for Ring data & videos that’d incriminate her? If Trooper Proctor didn’t unlawfully access the Ring app from either John or Karen’s phones to delete videos, then why would he contact & ask Ring wanting to know how long until their stored user data & videos are deleted from their servers for LE? Which is exactly what Proctor did on February 10, 2022, just days after arresting Karen Read, when he contacted them in an email from subpoenas@ring.com stating that the Ring videos had been deleted from DropBox after 90 days. If Proctor’s theory was that Karen struck & killed John with her taillight, breaking it into 45 pieces left at the scene, wouldn’t he be immediately filing a search warrant for those Ring videos to show that proof? If Proctor had unlawfully deleted those Ring videos himself though, he’d probably want to know how long until they’d be gone from Ring’s servers—evidence of HIS consciousness of guilt—so he could run out the clock so that they’re unable to be obtained, even when he does ultimately file a search warrant. Might that explain why he lied, purporting to have had a search warrant when he didn’t, knowing that the defense would’ve immediately filed an emergency motion to preserve that evidence? They ran out the clock & even lied to the defense so that there was no possible way for them to intervene before the evidence was fully destroyed & irretrievable. #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption
1:39

If Lead Investigator Michael Proctor is depraved enough to unlawfully search #KarenRead’s cellphone for nude photographs of her on January 29, 2022, then what’s not to say he wouldn’t delete the Ring cam videos that subsequently went missing, too? FACT: Both the videos in the Ring cam system & the photographs on Karen Read’s cellphone were accessed unlawfully, without search warrants, by Michael Proctor. Proctor also hid his conflict, failed to recuse himself & then lied for the next 2 years, steadfastly defending the falsehood that he wasn’t lifelong family friends with the Albert’s & McCabe’s. We now know that was a lie. But here’s the thing: Karen immediately turned over her cellphone to Trooper Proctor. So if there’s evidence that Ring cam videos were deleted from her cellphone after Michael Proctor seized it, then it’d be pretty damning proof that he deleted the videos. —————— How did Proctor access Karen Read’s cellphone so quickly, on day 1, when he was searching it for nude photos of her? Fully cooperative & eager to help in the investigation, Karen Read promptly accessed her cellphone in front of investigators to provide them with the contact info of everyone who was present the night before with her & John. Notably, Karen Read voluntarily turned her cellphone over to investigators, without a search warrant, when she was FIRST able to speak with them. These are the actions of an honest & forthcoming witness. Not a murderer. —————— The Commonwealth tells on itself, revealing just how Proctor accessed her cellphone without a search warrant (below) in its own filings: “The troopers further asked the defendant for contact information relating to the people she had indicated were present at the bars. The defendant obliged, and prior to providing said information, the troopers observed the defendant to enter a numerical passcode into her phone to unlock it, prior to retrieving said data.” —————— If Proctor preyed upon Karen Read’s trust by secretly watching her enter her passcode to unlock her cellphone, and remembering it for later so he could go through her phone, without a search warrant, looking for nude photos & other things unrelated to the investigation, then we already know he’s perfectly willing to unlawfully access things on her cellphone for nefarious purposes. If Karen had the Ring app on her cellphone, what’s not to say Proctor didn’t access it to delete videos? Ask yourself this: If Karen Read were guilty, would she be asking for Ring data & videos that’d incriminate her? If Trooper Proctor didn’t unlawfully access the Ring app from either John or Karen’s phones to delete videos, then why would he contact & ask Ring wanting to know how long until their stored user data & videos are deleted from their servers for LE? Which is exactly what Proctor did on February 10, 2022, just days after arresting Karen Read, when he contacted them in an email from [email protected] stating that the Ring videos had been deleted from DropBox after 90 days. If Proctor’s theory was that Karen struck & killed John with her taillight, breaking it into 45 pieces left at the scene, wouldn’t he be immediately filing a search warrant for those Ring videos to show that proof? If Proctor had unlawfully deleted those Ring videos himself though, he’d probably want to know how long until they’d be gone from Ring’s servers—evidence of HIS consciousness of guilt—so he could run out the clock so that they’re unable to be obtained, even when he does ultimately file a search warrant. Might that explain why he lied, purporting to have had a search warrant when he didn’t, knowing that the defense would’ve immediately filed an emergency motion to preserve that evidence? They ran out the clock & even lied to the defense so that there was no possible way for them to intervene before the evidence was fully destroyed & irretrievable. #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

153,072 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Sean Goode’s dashcam gives us another little gift from the “nothing to see here” department. Look at the driveway that morning. The two vehicles on the left clearly haven’t been moved in a while; they're covered in snow. Then, just to the right, you can see Matt McCabe’s vehicle pulled in. Now remember Jen McCabe’s testimony: she looked out the door and texted John to “pull behind me.” Behind where exactly? If Matt and Jen were parked on the left side, the remaining driveway space would’ve been gone. If they were parked where Matt’s vehicle is seen in the morning, same problem. Karen’s Lexus is roughly 16 feet 8 inches long. That SUV was not casually squeezing into that driveway behind anyone like a Matchbox car. So either this was the most optimistic parking suggestion in Canton history… or that text makes absolutely no sense when compared to the actual layout seen on the dash cam footage Jen says when she pulled into the driveway, there was already a car in front of her Okay let’s walk through that like normal human beings with eyes. Option 1 She parks on the LEFT side. If there was a car in front of her, and she pulled in behind it on that left side, then her rear end is basically at the mailbox or close to the street. That driveway space is now fully accounted for. There’s no magical extra 17 feet for Karen’s Lexus to just slide in behind everyone. Option 2: She parks on the RIGHT side. Same claim there’s a car in front of her. But here’s the problem… In the dashcam the next morning we see Matt and Jens vehicle sitting there on the right side and there is no car in front of it. None. Zero. Not “it left early.” Not “it melted with the snow.” Just… gone. So now we’ve got two possibilities: The car Jen says was in front of her never existed in that position, or It existed and somehow disappeared without leaving any trace, while every other vehicle stayed put long enough to collect snow And remember Matt’s vehicle is shown as freshly pulled in in the morning footage. Clean positioning, no evidence of another vehicle having been there ahead of it. At some point this stops being confusion… and starts looking like a story that doesn’t match the environment it supposedly happened in.
0:52

Sean Goode’s dashcam gives us another little gift from the “nothing to see here” department. Look at the driveway that morning. The two vehicles on the left clearly haven’t been moved in a while; they're covered in snow. Then, just to the right, you can see Matt McCabe’s vehicle pulled in. Now remember Jen McCabe’s testimony: she looked out the door and texted John to “pull behind me.” Behind where exactly? If Matt and Jen were parked on the left side, the remaining driveway space would’ve been gone. If they were parked where Matt’s vehicle is seen in the morning, same problem. Karen’s Lexus is roughly 16 feet 8 inches long. That SUV was not casually squeezing into that driveway behind anyone like a Matchbox car. So either this was the most optimistic parking suggestion in Canton history… or that text makes absolutely no sense when compared to the actual layout seen on the dash cam footage Jen says when she pulled into the driveway, there was already a car in front of her Okay let’s walk through that like normal human beings with eyes. Option 1 She parks on the LEFT side. If there was a car in front of her, and she pulled in behind it on that left side, then her rear end is basically at the mailbox or close to the street. That driveway space is now fully accounted for. There’s no magical extra 17 feet for Karen’s Lexus to just slide in behind everyone. Option 2: She parks on the RIGHT side. Same claim there’s a car in front of her. But here’s the problem… In the dashcam the next morning we see Matt and Jens vehicle sitting there on the right side and there is no car in front of it. None. Zero. Not “it left early.” Not “it melted with the snow.” Just… gone. So now we’ve got two possibilities: The car Jen says was in front of her never existed in that position, or It existed and somehow disappeared without leaving any trace, while every other vehicle stayed put long enough to collect snow And remember Matt’s vehicle is shown as freshly pulled in in the morning footage. Clean positioning, no evidence of another vehicle having been there ahead of it. At some point this stops being confusion… and starts looking like a story that doesn’t match the environment it supposedly happened in.

Dixie Normus

29,235 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten