Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

RED 'HAND' CARPET: An Oscars Social Experiment 🎥🇵🇸👀🍿 Last year at The Oscar's, celebrities wore the red hand pin thinking it was a symbol of peace. But did they know it was actually a symbol that stands for the lynching of Jews in Ramallah in 2000? The red hands...

zachsagefox's profile picture

Zach Sage Fox

56,605 subscribers

83,736 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаЮморИскусство
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Tommy
Tommy1 год назад

Wonderful work. Keep doing you. You’re proving the world wrong and how fools they are. Sadly you aren’t getting enough attention on this. Everyone go repost and share this Zach’s video

Фото профиля Bahman Mehdizadeh
Bahman Mehdizadeh1 год назад

God bless you. you do amazing things. just why the theatrical music in the background. let it speak for itself. just my thoughts. Godspeed

Фото профиля OK
OK1 год назад

Am Yisrael Chai. Well done I hope you're there all day ! Mr Religion of Peace sure was getting agitated. 🤔 Bring Them Home! NOW

Фото профиля Stories of Antisemitism
Stories of Antisemitism1 год назад

Many well-meaning uninformed Americans are “useful idiots” to the Hamas propaganda machine. God help us. We need more of this.

Фото профиля Hans Hansen
Hans Hansen1 год назад

The Arab proves your point

Фото профиля Midwest Nice ✝️🇺🇸🎗️🇮🇱
Midwest Nice ✝️🇺🇸🎗️🇮🇱1 год назад

Andy Dick is a mensch. Love him. I interned on the set of Newsradio and he was the only person who was nice to me.

Фото профиля Monica
Monica1 год назад

Oh look. A lying, belligerent and violent “Palestinian.” I want the hostages home but I also want to stop pretending we can be neighbors with those genocidal freaks.

Фото профиля Joshua Winer
Joshua Winer1 год назад

great job... unfortunately, the people that need to see this will never watch it... don't be deterred and keep up the education

Фото профиля Ike Funkhauser 🎗️🎗️
Ike Funkhauser 🎗️🎗️1 год назад

@davidmdraiman Andy dick lol gold

Фото профиля 🎗ISRAELI!!🎗 🏈Chiefs🏈⚾Royals⚾🏀Jayhawks🏀 fan
🎗ISRAELI!!🎗 🏈Chiefs🏈⚾Royals⚾🏀Jayhawks🏀 fan1 год назад

@zachsagefox as a US citizen who moved to Israel when I was 12, served in the IDF and has done over 200 days of reserve duty the past year and half. I just want to say that what you are doing is incredible! Your videos are inspiring! Keep fighting the good fight! #AmYisraelChai

Фото профиля Elise Oyin
Elise Oyin1 год назад

All in Christ Jesus for all ages use all their faiths, souls, wills, salvations, blood, spirits declare N9000g efs that none lift Elise Oyinkromeineifa's skirt over face, show her nakedness n shame to none, and cast abominable filth on her for al ages Jesus Christ name u9000gbeiC

Похожие видео

They actually thought they had a hostage. Little did they know they were about to become hostages.😭 What confuses me is that these people know Red, but they still don't KNOW him. There will never be another character in the history of Hollywood that can beat this character.🎬🍿
3:06

They actually thought they had a hostage. Little did they know they were about to become hostages.😭 What confuses me is that these people know Red, but they still don't KNOW him. There will never be another character in the history of Hollywood that can beat this character.🎬🍿

Sweetgirl🌸

435,397 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This is a pertinent clip from Sam Harris on the moral difference between Israel and her enemies. The moral difference comes down to understanding the answer to this question: what would each side do if they had the power to do it? TRANSCRIPT: The truth is that there is an obvious, undeniable, and hugely consequential moral difference between Israel and her enemies. The Israelis are surrounded by people who have explicitly genocidal intentions towards them. The charter of Hamas is explicitly genocidal. It looks forward to a time, based on Koranic prophesy, when the earth itself will cry out for Jewish blood, where the trees and the stones will say “O Muslim, there’s a Jew hiding behind me. Come and kill him.” This is a political document. We are talking about a government that was voted into power by a majority of Palestinians. The discourse in the Muslim world about Jews is utterly shocking. Not only is there widespread Holocaust denial—there’s Holocaust denial that then asserts that we will do it for real if given the chance. The only thing more obnoxious than denying the Holocaust is to say that it should have happened; it didn’t happen, but if we get the chance, we will accomplish it. There are children’s shows in the Palestinian territories and elsewhere that teach five-year-olds about the glories of martyrdom and about the necessity of killing Jews. And this gets to the heart of the moral difference between Israel and her enemies. And this is something I discussed in The End of Faith. To see this moral difference, you have to ask what each side would do if they had the power to do it. What would the Jews do to the Palestinians if they could do anything they wanted? Well, we know the answer to that question, because they can do more or less anything they want. The Israeli army could kill everyone in Gaza tomorrow. So what does that mean? Well, it means that, when they drop a bomb on a beach and kill four Palestinian children, as happened last week, this is almost certainly an accident. They’re not targeting children. They could target as many children as they want. Every time a Palestinian child dies, Israel edges ever closer to becoming an international pariah. So the Israelis take great pains not to kill children and other noncombatants. What do we know of the Palestinians? What would the Palestinians do to the Jews in Israel if the power imbalance were reversed? Well, they have told us what they would do. For some reason, Israel’s critics just don’t want to believe the worst about a group like Hamas, even when it declares the worst of itself. We’ve already had a Holocaust and several other genocides in the 20th century. People are capable of committing genocide. When they tell us they intend to commit genocide, we should listen. There is every reason to believe that the Palestinians would kill all the Jews in Israel if they could. Would every Palestinian support genocide? Of course not. But vast numbers of them—and of Muslims throughout the world—would. Needless to say, the Palestinians in general, not just Hamas, have a history of targeting innocent noncombatants in the most shocking ways possible. They’ve blown themselves up on buses and in restaurants. They’ve massacred teenagers. They’ve murdered Olympic athletes. They now shoot rockets indiscriminately into civilian areas. And again, the charter of their government in Gaza explicitly tells us that they want to annihilate the Jews—not just in Israel but everywhere.
3:08

This is a pertinent clip from Sam Harris on the moral difference between Israel and her enemies. The moral difference comes down to understanding the answer to this question: what would each side do if they had the power to do it? TRANSCRIPT: The truth is that there is an obvious, undeniable, and hugely consequential moral difference between Israel and her enemies. The Israelis are surrounded by people who have explicitly genocidal intentions towards them. The charter of Hamas is explicitly genocidal. It looks forward to a time, based on Koranic prophesy, when the earth itself will cry out for Jewish blood, where the trees and the stones will say “O Muslim, there’s a Jew hiding behind me. Come and kill him.” This is a political document. We are talking about a government that was voted into power by a majority of Palestinians. The discourse in the Muslim world about Jews is utterly shocking. Not only is there widespread Holocaust denial—there’s Holocaust denial that then asserts that we will do it for real if given the chance. The only thing more obnoxious than denying the Holocaust is to say that it should have happened; it didn’t happen, but if we get the chance, we will accomplish it. There are children’s shows in the Palestinian territories and elsewhere that teach five-year-olds about the glories of martyrdom and about the necessity of killing Jews. And this gets to the heart of the moral difference between Israel and her enemies. And this is something I discussed in The End of Faith. To see this moral difference, you have to ask what each side would do if they had the power to do it. What would the Jews do to the Palestinians if they could do anything they wanted? Well, we know the answer to that question, because they can do more or less anything they want. The Israeli army could kill everyone in Gaza tomorrow. So what does that mean? Well, it means that, when they drop a bomb on a beach and kill four Palestinian children, as happened last week, this is almost certainly an accident. They’re not targeting children. They could target as many children as they want. Every time a Palestinian child dies, Israel edges ever closer to becoming an international pariah. So the Israelis take great pains not to kill children and other noncombatants. What do we know of the Palestinians? What would the Palestinians do to the Jews in Israel if the power imbalance were reversed? Well, they have told us what they would do. For some reason, Israel’s critics just don’t want to believe the worst about a group like Hamas, even when it declares the worst of itself. We’ve already had a Holocaust and several other genocides in the 20th century. People are capable of committing genocide. When they tell us they intend to commit genocide, we should listen. There is every reason to believe that the Palestinians would kill all the Jews in Israel if they could. Would every Palestinian support genocide? Of course not. But vast numbers of them—and of Muslims throughout the world—would. Needless to say, the Palestinians in general, not just Hamas, have a history of targeting innocent noncombatants in the most shocking ways possible. They’ve blown themselves up on buses and in restaurants. They’ve massacred teenagers. They’ve murdered Olympic athletes. They now shoot rockets indiscriminately into civilian areas. And again, the charter of their government in Gaza explicitly tells us that they want to annihilate the Jews—not just in Israel but everywhere.

Colin Wright

4,195,398 просмотров • 2 лет назад

This is Saint John, Canada. For those unaware, red hand prints as a symbol originated from a lynching of 2 Jews who had taken a wrong turn while driving and ended up in the West Bank. The mob covered their hands in their victims' blood and held them up for people to see.
0:35

This is Saint John, Canada. For those unaware, red hand prints as a symbol originated from a lynching of 2 Jews who had taken a wrong turn while driving and ended up in the West Bank. The mob covered their hands in their victims' blood and held them up for people to see.

David Jacobs

51,674 просмотров • 2 лет назад

WOW 🚨 Before the Oscars California Democrats had the city tow everyone’s cars even though they were parked legally Residents were forced to pay over $400 to get their cars out of the tow yard “Hollywood residents told NBC Los Angeles that the Los Angeles Department of Transportation began towing parked cars before the Oscars — While the rich and famous were attending the Academy Awards on Sunday, many Hollywood neighbors scrambled to find out where their cars were” “An event that caters so much to the wealthy and an industry that has so much money when they hold this event, they tow the people that live in Hollywood, which this is not a high rent neighborhood. Most of the people I know who work here, they work full time, probably overtime, multiple jobs and discharge them $400 again in the name of the Oscars. It's kind of, it's kinda messed up”
1:10

WOW 🚨 Before the Oscars California Democrats had the city tow everyone’s cars even though they were parked legally Residents were forced to pay over $400 to get their cars out of the tow yard “Hollywood residents told NBC Los Angeles that the Los Angeles Department of Transportation began towing parked cars before the Oscars — While the rich and famous were attending the Academy Awards on Sunday, many Hollywood neighbors scrambled to find out where their cars were” “An event that caters so much to the wealthy and an industry that has so much money when they hold this event, they tow the people that live in Hollywood, which this is not a high rent neighborhood. Most of the people I know who work here, they work full time, probably overtime, multiple jobs and discharge them $400 again in the name of the Oscars. It's kind of, it's kinda messed up”

Wall Street Apes

151,902 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

It's Clowns like these that are the reason people scoff at the mention of the illuminati. They immdiately think of the clown celebrities doing silly hand signs. Meanwhile the real illuminati have there symbol on every dollar in existance, they own all the media and banks, they control most celebrities and movies, they have control of all the major power centers and people laugh at them like they are a joke. They are very real watch a video I made here if you doubt it. 👊
17:28

It's Clowns like these that are the reason people scoff at the mention of the illuminati. They immdiately think of the clown celebrities doing silly hand signs. Meanwhile the real illuminati have there symbol on every dollar in existance, they own all the media and banks, they control most celebrities and movies, they have control of all the major power centers and people laugh at them like they are a joke. They are very real watch a video I made here if you doubt it. 👊

WokeWorldOrder

74,600 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Optically, they stole the 2020 Election. They were unsuccessful. If they had been successful, we would not be here right now. They were allowed to proceed with certain guardrails in place to keep us out of WW3 and to not let the country fall past the point of no return. The people were too divided. The people were too brainwashed. There would have been a civil war. The four year pause was the only way. Biden was the red pill needed. Was it a show? A lot of it was, yes. Did it come with real life consequences? Yes, which is why I refuse to say it was all a show. It’s time for the difficult truths to be revealed, and people can accept it or reject it, but the truth is still the truth. In my opinion, the first difficult truth to learn is that Trump won the 2020 election, and the world will soon know.
0:37

Optically, they stole the 2020 Election. They were unsuccessful. If they had been successful, we would not be here right now. They were allowed to proceed with certain guardrails in place to keep us out of WW3 and to not let the country fall past the point of no return. The people were too divided. The people were too brainwashed. There would have been a civil war. The four year pause was the only way. Biden was the red pill needed. Was it a show? A lot of it was, yes. Did it come with real life consequences? Yes, which is why I refuse to say it was all a show. It’s time for the difficult truths to be revealed, and people can accept it or reject it, but the truth is still the truth. In my opinion, the first difficult truth to learn is that Trump won the 2020 election, and the world will soon know.

RealAF Patriot

29,747 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨THEY ARE KILLING THEIR OWN RELATIVES AND TURNING THEIR CHILDREN INTO TRANSGENDERS. This is the price of fame in Hollywood Mike Smith - a well-known Hollywood stuntman and director - shocked everyone with his confession: "In the highest circles of Hollywood, they demand blood sacrifices or the gender transition of their children as a symbol of devotion to demons and fallen angels." He asks directly: How many more celebrities have to lose their loved ones in "mysterious accidents" before people finally see the pattern? This is not a conspiracy theory. It is the confession of a man who was inside the system. What do you think - truth or madness?
1:14

🚨THEY ARE KILLING THEIR OWN RELATIVES AND TURNING THEIR CHILDREN INTO TRANSGENDERS. This is the price of fame in Hollywood Mike Smith - a well-known Hollywood stuntman and director - shocked everyone with his confession: "In the highest circles of Hollywood, they demand blood sacrifices or the gender transition of their children as a symbol of devotion to demons and fallen angels." He asks directly: How many more celebrities have to lose their loved ones in "mysterious accidents" before people finally see the pattern? This is not a conspiracy theory. It is the confession of a man who was inside the system. What do you think - truth or madness?

XSpirit

13,582 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Look at how pathetic this is Adam Green - Know More News "(Jews) were the chosen people. But once according to the father of the church, they apostatized and rejected Christ, they ceased being the chosen religion and the and the chosen people. And now it's transferred to Christians who believe in Christ." "The big mistake that people make is still thinking that they're the the Jews are the chosen people. They were but they um they rejected their inheritance. They refused to accept Christ"
3:41

Look at how pathetic this is Adam Green - Know More News "(Jews) were the chosen people. But once according to the father of the church, they apostatized and rejected Christ, they ceased being the chosen religion and the and the chosen people. And now it's transferred to Christians who believe in Christ." "The big mistake that people make is still thinking that they're the the Jews are the chosen people. They were but they um they rejected their inheritance. They refused to accept Christ"

Seethroughitall

71,904 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Emily Blunt now believes in UFOs after researching for Disclosure Day “This certainly sparked the fires of my imagination when I started researching everything to do with people who have had these experiences from the congressional hearings that had taken place, every documentary, the docuseries. I think that the thing that I was struck by was how inarguable it seemed to me that people were lying. There was this absolute peaceful truth pouring out of them. They know what they saw. They believe it. Even if they've been discredited, disvalued, kicked out, lost their jobs, accused of being whistleblowers, they believe it. There was a sort of universal peacefulness, I think, in all of them as to what they had seen and that they had been awe struck by it and shifted by it. I just found it very healing actually watching all of these people talk about this otherworldly experience that they had. And I think it would be a very good thing for human beings to question their place in the universe. I think it might be an arrogant thing to assume that we know everything, that we're alone. I mean, they just discovered a thousand new species in our oceans this year on Earth. So, why would we imagine that we know everything that's out there in the universe?”
1:28

Emily Blunt now believes in UFOs after researching for Disclosure Day “This certainly sparked the fires of my imagination when I started researching everything to do with people who have had these experiences from the congressional hearings that had taken place, every documentary, the docuseries. I think that the thing that I was struck by was how inarguable it seemed to me that people were lying. There was this absolute peaceful truth pouring out of them. They know what they saw. They believe it. Even if they've been discredited, disvalued, kicked out, lost their jobs, accused of being whistleblowers, they believe it. There was a sort of universal peacefulness, I think, in all of them as to what they had seen and that they had been awe struck by it and shifted by it. I just found it very healing actually watching all of these people talk about this otherworldly experience that they had. And I think it would be a very good thing for human beings to question their place in the universe. I think it might be an arrogant thing to assume that we know everything, that we're alone. I mean, they just discovered a thousand new species in our oceans this year on Earth. So, why would we imagine that we know everything that's out there in the universe?”

Red Panda Koala

56,336 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

"They put Trump in to get the control grid... [and he gets an] A+++. He's done a fabulous job... But... I don't think they need [him] anymore. That doesn't mean they're gonna get rid of him, but if they wanna get rid of him with Epstein, they can... by the end of the year...." This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from an interview with Paul Buitink (Paul Buitink 🎙) posted to the Reinvent Money YouTube channel on August 3, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "So I think they put Trump in to get the control grid. And we have, at Solari, we have a collection that we update every week of all the things the administration is doing to build the control grid. And I have to tell you, if I had chosen Trump to get the control grid, and I was going to grade him on his performance to date, he gets an A plus plus plus. He's done a fabulous job. And I can't imagine another politician who could have done this much this fast "But if you look at what they've achieved, I don't think they need Trump anymore. Now, that doesn't mean they're gonna get rid of him, but if they wanna get rid of him with Epstein, they can. "So I don't know if he was using a lot in the campaign. I think Kash Patel was using it a lot, and I think Dan Bongino was using it a lot. "So here's who pushed it. And I didn't realize this until recently, because I was very early on in saying QAnon was a hope porn and ridiculous and not to pay any attention to it. But what I didn't understand was QAnon made a very big deal about Epstein and pedophilia and Trump secretly cleaning it all up. "And basically the Democrats were engaged in pedophilia and they were at the heart of Epstein and Trump was going to secretly clean it all up. So QAnon apparently made a huge deal about Epstein. And, you know, that is seriously, in my opinion, and I say this because I know many people trapped in it, you know, it's a cult, it's just a completely adult fairy tale, but they believed it. And so now that he's coming out and saying, oh, it was a hoax, you know, Epstein is a hoax, it flies completely in the face of the cult. So now we've got a really big problem. And I don't know why he didn't put it back in the box. I don't know why. "If the people who run the system want Trump out, they can use Epstein to do it. It will work, and they can get him out by the end of the year if they want."
2:51

"They put Trump in to get the control grid... [and he gets an] A+++. He's done a fabulous job... But... I don't think they need [him] anymore. That doesn't mean they're gonna get rid of him, but if they wanna get rid of him with Epstein, they can... by the end of the year...." This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from an interview with Paul Buitink (Paul Buitink 🎙) posted to the Reinvent Money YouTube channel on August 3, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "So I think they put Trump in to get the control grid. And we have, at Solari, we have a collection that we update every week of all the things the administration is doing to build the control grid. And I have to tell you, if I had chosen Trump to get the control grid, and I was going to grade him on his performance to date, he gets an A plus plus plus. He's done a fabulous job. And I can't imagine another politician who could have done this much this fast "But if you look at what they've achieved, I don't think they need Trump anymore. Now, that doesn't mean they're gonna get rid of him, but if they wanna get rid of him with Epstein, they can. "So I don't know if he was using a lot in the campaign. I think Kash Patel was using it a lot, and I think Dan Bongino was using it a lot. "So here's who pushed it. And I didn't realize this until recently, because I was very early on in saying QAnon was a hope porn and ridiculous and not to pay any attention to it. But what I didn't understand was QAnon made a very big deal about Epstein and pedophilia and Trump secretly cleaning it all up. "And basically the Democrats were engaged in pedophilia and they were at the heart of Epstein and Trump was going to secretly clean it all up. So QAnon apparently made a huge deal about Epstein. And, you know, that is seriously, in my opinion, and I say this because I know many people trapped in it, you know, it's a cult, it's just a completely adult fairy tale, but they believed it. And so now that he's coming out and saying, oh, it was a hoax, you know, Epstein is a hoax, it flies completely in the face of the cult. So now we've got a really big problem. And I don't know why he didn't put it back in the box. I don't know why. "If the people who run the system want Trump out, they can use Epstein to do it. It will work, and they can get him out by the end of the year if they want."

Sense Receptor

218,555 просмотров • 1 год назад

If you cannot understand how religion plays a part in unifying a demographic, you will never understand what made the Third Reich so strong. It didn't matter if it wasn't believed, or if they planned on destroying it later. It mattered to bring the people together and fight for a common cause. It made it mean something. Why do you think jews love democracy so much? It is not only to take over a nation, but to cause so much division with "diversity" that the people cannot unite. It creates a tension that keeps the people relying on the system, hurting each other, and just finding reasons to hate one another. They know very well that the American people will likely never come together to create some kind of unity like that ever again. However, I do see some kind of unity happening with a shared disdain for a mutual enemy. I think in this case it is not religion, but the truth that is bringing people together. They called Adolf "The Unifier" for that reason. Under Christianity he revived the German spirit and brought the German volk together. They felt so strongly about what they were fighting for, they were willing to fight until the very end. Those 12 years that they did not spend as a slave was probably better than 60 years of our lives under this system. So, they fought for it. They called it Positive Christianity. It was the framework of National Socialism. Fascism brought them freedom. They wanted to preserve their own soil, not take over the world. To protect their homeland and their people.
10:00

If you cannot understand how religion plays a part in unifying a demographic, you will never understand what made the Third Reich so strong. It didn't matter if it wasn't believed, or if they planned on destroying it later. It mattered to bring the people together and fight for a common cause. It made it mean something. Why do you think jews love democracy so much? It is not only to take over a nation, but to cause so much division with "diversity" that the people cannot unite. It creates a tension that keeps the people relying on the system, hurting each other, and just finding reasons to hate one another. They know very well that the American people will likely never come together to create some kind of unity like that ever again. However, I do see some kind of unity happening with a shared disdain for a mutual enemy. I think in this case it is not religion, but the truth that is bringing people together. They called Adolf "The Unifier" for that reason. Under Christianity he revived the German spirit and brought the German volk together. They felt so strongly about what they were fighting for, they were willing to fight until the very end. Those 12 years that they did not spend as a slave was probably better than 60 years of our lives under this system. So, they fought for it. They called it Positive Christianity. It was the framework of National Socialism. Fascism brought them freedom. They wanted to preserve their own soil, not take over the world. To protect their homeland and their people.

Mofobian

21,155 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Trump explains the history of how Gaza got wrecked by Hamas: "Israel withdrew from Gaza thinking they would live in peace. They said, 'You take it, this is our contribution to peace.' But that didn't work out. They pulled away, they let them have it, and I never forgot that because I said, 'That doesn't sound like a good deal to me,' as a real estate person: They gave up the ocean! Right? Who would do this deal? And it still didn't work out. They were very generous actually, and they gave up the most magnificent piece of land in the Middle East, and they said 'All we want to do is have peace,' and that request was not honored... "Instead of building a better life for their people Hamas devoted their resources to building 400 miles of terror infrastructure, rocket facilities, and hid their military command posts and launch sites in hospitals, schools, and mosques, so if you went after them you wouldn't even realize and you would end up knocking out a hospital or a school or a mosque."
1:21

Trump explains the history of how Gaza got wrecked by Hamas: "Israel withdrew from Gaza thinking they would live in peace. They said, 'You take it, this is our contribution to peace.' But that didn't work out. They pulled away, they let them have it, and I never forgot that because I said, 'That doesn't sound like a good deal to me,' as a real estate person: They gave up the ocean! Right? Who would do this deal? And it still didn't work out. They were very generous actually, and they gave up the most magnificent piece of land in the Middle East, and they said 'All we want to do is have peace,' and that request was not honored... "Instead of building a better life for their people Hamas devoted their resources to building 400 miles of terror infrastructure, rocket facilities, and hid their military command posts and launch sites in hospitals, schools, and mosques, so if you went after them you wouldn't even realize and you would end up knocking out a hospital or a school or a mosque."

Saul Sadka

325,077 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🇵🇱 🇩🇪 🇮🇱 🇺🇸 A Pole / Catholic victim of the German concentration camp tells the truth about Auschwitz. 🎤 You are a Catholic and you were in Auschwitz is that correct? ,,Yes, that is true, so what? " - Michał Ścisłowski. 🎤 Which number is that? ,,119431" - Michał Ścisłowski. ,,Ladies and gentlemen, as we know, the Auschwitz camp was formed by Germans in June 1940. The first transports that went to the Auschwitz include only Polish Christians. Jews arrived in the second half of 1942 and they have always been directed to Birkenau camp - "Brzezinka" in Polish. It is 3 km from Auschwitz which Germans called "Stammlager". Stammlager Auschwitz was exclusively for Poles. There were very few jews there but whoever was from the jews was always on an executive position. Because the Germans' tactics have always been such as to use Poles against jews and jews against Poles. All shipments that have been in half wiped out it was in Birkenau, because in the Birkenau there were 5 crematoriums and in Stammlager Auschwitz there was only 1 crematorium, very small one and there were wiped out only Poles in 1940 and 1941. So please do not be mistaken that jews were in Auschwitz. Jews were always transported to Birkenau and us Polish Christians they always keept and there was always more of us Polish than jews. After all it is misleading and it is such an unfortunate thing that the jews here have more money and have connections to do incredible propaganda and this is an absolutely impossible thing, enough of this lie for God's sake. Stand up Polish people and tell the truth to the Americans because they are total dumbasses, they know nothing" - Michał Ścisłowski. 🎤 Why do you think that Americans believe that in Auschwitz only the jews were dying? ,,Because all jewish transports went to Birkenau, not to Auschwitz. This is a mistake. They say Auschwitz because Germans at the end of 1944 they began to use a nomenclature Auschwitz 1, Auschwitz 2, Auschwitz 3 etc. So Birkenau they named Auschwitz 2 - the second camp and that's why jews impersonate and say Auschwitz. They say that they were in the same in Auschwitz but this is an unfortunate thing because we know it very well that all gas chambers were in Birkenau and not in Auschwitz" - Michał Ścisłowski.
4:23

🇵🇱 🇩🇪 🇮🇱 🇺🇸 A Pole / Catholic victim of the German concentration camp tells the truth about Auschwitz. 🎤 You are a Catholic and you were in Auschwitz is that correct? ,,Yes, that is true, so what? " - Michał Ścisłowski. 🎤 Which number is that? ,,119431" - Michał Ścisłowski. ,,Ladies and gentlemen, as we know, the Auschwitz camp was formed by Germans in June 1940. The first transports that went to the Auschwitz include only Polish Christians. Jews arrived in the second half of 1942 and they have always been directed to Birkenau camp - "Brzezinka" in Polish. It is 3 km from Auschwitz which Germans called "Stammlager". Stammlager Auschwitz was exclusively for Poles. There were very few jews there but whoever was from the jews was always on an executive position. Because the Germans' tactics have always been such as to use Poles against jews and jews against Poles. All shipments that have been in half wiped out it was in Birkenau, because in the Birkenau there were 5 crematoriums and in Stammlager Auschwitz there was only 1 crematorium, very small one and there were wiped out only Poles in 1940 and 1941. So please do not be mistaken that jews were in Auschwitz. Jews were always transported to Birkenau and us Polish Christians they always keept and there was always more of us Polish than jews. After all it is misleading and it is such an unfortunate thing that the jews here have more money and have connections to do incredible propaganda and this is an absolutely impossible thing, enough of this lie for God's sake. Stand up Polish people and tell the truth to the Americans because they are total dumbasses, they know nothing" - Michał Ścisłowski. 🎤 Why do you think that Americans believe that in Auschwitz only the jews were dying? ,,Because all jewish transports went to Birkenau, not to Auschwitz. This is a mistake. They say Auschwitz because Germans at the end of 1944 they began to use a nomenclature Auschwitz 1, Auschwitz 2, Auschwitz 3 etc. So Birkenau they named Auschwitz 2 - the second camp and that's why jews impersonate and say Auschwitz. They say that they were in the same in Auschwitz but this is an unfortunate thing because we know it very well that all gas chambers were in Birkenau and not in Auschwitz" - Michał Ścisłowski.

Based Poland 🇵🇱

180,709 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Melanie Phillips admits Jews push multiculturalism and white guilt on European Nations as a means of destroying them But she's more worried about the backlash against Jews for this behavior than actually stopping the Jews from engaging in this type of behavior... "They're looking at a situation in which some 70% of American Jews subscribe to liberal shibileths to do with multiculturalism uh welcoming uh Islam into the country um uh uh saying that you know white people have white privilege and white guilt and all that" "There are very prominent Jews who are there are Jews who are very prominent in this in in that whole way of thinking" "They fixated on the Jews. They fixated in this way for two reasons. First, because they think the Jews are so because the Jews are so prominent, that's all they can see. But secondly, the thing that makes it absolutely neuralgic and they say it, they say, "You have your country, which is made up of people like you. You have your country to go to. We don't anymore. It's been taken away from us by people like you." And uh this is a terrible, terrible thing"
4:09

Melanie Phillips admits Jews push multiculturalism and white guilt on European Nations as a means of destroying them But she's more worried about the backlash against Jews for this behavior than actually stopping the Jews from engaging in this type of behavior... "They're looking at a situation in which some 70% of American Jews subscribe to liberal shibileths to do with multiculturalism uh welcoming uh Islam into the country um uh uh saying that you know white people have white privilege and white guilt and all that" "There are very prominent Jews who are there are Jews who are very prominent in this in in that whole way of thinking" "They fixated on the Jews. They fixated in this way for two reasons. First, because they think the Jews are so because the Jews are so prominent, that's all they can see. But secondly, the thing that makes it absolutely neuralgic and they say it, they say, "You have your country, which is made up of people like you. You have your country to go to. We don't anymore. It's been taken away from us by people like you." And uh this is a terrible, terrible thing"

Seethroughitall

157,924 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨🇵🇸 “THE UN RESOLUTION IS A DEATH WARRANT FOR GAZA” Norman Finkelstein accuses Egypt, Turkey, Qatar, and even the Palestinian Authority, of backing a UN resolution that hands Gaza to Trump under the guise of peace. He argues they had a choice: stop the war and speak the truth, or seal the deal that dooms Gaza’s future. “The Trump peace plan and then the UN resolution, that was negotiated by Egypt, Turkey and Qatar, they all supported handing Gaza over to Trump. They had an alternative [though], an alternative of telling the truth. You could say: ‘We signed on to this resolution because we wanted to stop the war. However, we recognize that this resolution is a death warrant for Gaza. We recognize it.’ There was no gun put to your head. The Russians, when they abstained, and also the Chinese when they abstained. You know what they said? ‘We wanted to exercise our veto, but we had no choice because all the Arab states said they supported the resolution.’ And then you know what happened? The Palestinian Authority said, ‘We welcome the resolution.’ So the Russian delegation's last words were, ‘Don't say we didn't warn you.’ And that's a fact.” Norman Finkelstein
2:47

🚨🇵🇸 “THE UN RESOLUTION IS A DEATH WARRANT FOR GAZA” Norman Finkelstein accuses Egypt, Turkey, Qatar, and even the Palestinian Authority, of backing a UN resolution that hands Gaza to Trump under the guise of peace. He argues they had a choice: stop the war and speak the truth, or seal the deal that dooms Gaza’s future. “The Trump peace plan and then the UN resolution, that was negotiated by Egypt, Turkey and Qatar, they all supported handing Gaza over to Trump. They had an alternative [though], an alternative of telling the truth. You could say: ‘We signed on to this resolution because we wanted to stop the war. However, we recognize that this resolution is a death warrant for Gaza. We recognize it.’ There was no gun put to your head. The Russians, when they abstained, and also the Chinese when they abstained. You know what they said? ‘We wanted to exercise our veto, but we had no choice because all the Arab states said they supported the resolution.’ And then you know what happened? The Palestinian Authority said, ‘We welcome the resolution.’ So the Russian delegation's last words were, ‘Don't say we didn't warn you.’ And that's a fact.” Norman Finkelstein

Mario Nawfal

13,901 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

NEW: Ret. Army Colonel and Trump 1.0 SecDef senior advisor Douglas MacGregor on the October 7 attack on Israel: "It was... allowed to happen... Clearly this was a setup" "why did it take 3 hours for reaction forces to show up and defend the Israeli population?" "The Israelis had done a brilliant job of carefully following and monitoring everyone inside Gaza. They knew what was happening almost before it happened" "we know that there were a group of, I think it was six or seven, Israeli women on the IDF whose entire focus during their term of enlistment was to focus on Gaza. And they raised the red flag of what was going on in Gaza several times. And for whatever reason, nobody reacted" This clip of MacGregor (Douglas Macgregor), who's also a combat veteran, military analyst, and author, is taken from an interview with James Patrick (James Patrick) posted to the BIG PICTURE YouTube channel on June 29, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Patrick: "And do you think this October 7th thing set all this in motion? ... Do you think that was a false flag? MacGregor: "Yeah. Well, it wasn't a false flag. It was simply allowed to happen. "And I think that at some point, it'll become patently obvious, because I visited that headquarters in 2020. The Israelis had done a brilliant job of carefully following and monitoring everyone inside Gaza. They knew what was happening almost before it happened. "They knew who had taken a shot at them and who hadn't. They'd learned how to defend themselves against these tunnels. I think they knew. "And now we know that there were a group of, I think it was six or seven, Israeli women on the IDF whose entire focus during their term of enlistment was to focus on Gaza. And they raised the red flag of what was going on in Gaza several times. And for whatever reason, nobody reacted. "Then they were told by the deputy chief of staff for intelligence in Egypt. He called over to the Mossad, presumably, maybe Shin Bet, I don't know which it was at the time, and said, Look, we see a big attack coming out of Gaza. "Well, why didn't somebody react? And then when it did come, why did it take three hours for reaction forces to show up and defend the Israeli population? Clearly, this was a setup. "It was designed to trigger the response that they wanted from the rest of the world, as well as from their own people, against the Muslims living in Gaza, the people they called 'Amalek,' animals." Patrick: "Is Israel engaging in a classic example of imperial hubris here? Imperial hubris?" MacGregor: "Well, of course. I mean, the arrogance and hubris are stifling. But that's because of their control of us. And I think that's what people have to understand. They say, when does this end? And I try to tell them when Israel no longer controls the United States armed forces, and that means no longer controls Congress and the presidency. Right now, they effectively control them."
2:08

NEW: Ret. Army Colonel and Trump 1.0 SecDef senior advisor Douglas MacGregor on the October 7 attack on Israel: "It was... allowed to happen... Clearly this was a setup" "why did it take 3 hours for reaction forces to show up and defend the Israeli population?" "The Israelis had done a brilliant job of carefully following and monitoring everyone inside Gaza. They knew what was happening almost before it happened" "we know that there were a group of, I think it was six or seven, Israeli women on the IDF whose entire focus during their term of enlistment was to focus on Gaza. And they raised the red flag of what was going on in Gaza several times. And for whatever reason, nobody reacted" This clip of MacGregor (Douglas Macgregor), who's also a combat veteran, military analyst, and author, is taken from an interview with James Patrick (James Patrick) posted to the BIG PICTURE YouTube channel on June 29, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Patrick: "And do you think this October 7th thing set all this in motion? ... Do you think that was a false flag? MacGregor: "Yeah. Well, it wasn't a false flag. It was simply allowed to happen. "And I think that at some point, it'll become patently obvious, because I visited that headquarters in 2020. The Israelis had done a brilliant job of carefully following and monitoring everyone inside Gaza. They knew what was happening almost before it happened. "They knew who had taken a shot at them and who hadn't. They'd learned how to defend themselves against these tunnels. I think they knew. "And now we know that there were a group of, I think it was six or seven, Israeli women on the IDF whose entire focus during their term of enlistment was to focus on Gaza. And they raised the red flag of what was going on in Gaza several times. And for whatever reason, nobody reacted. "Then they were told by the deputy chief of staff for intelligence in Egypt. He called over to the Mossad, presumably, maybe Shin Bet, I don't know which it was at the time, and said, Look, we see a big attack coming out of Gaza. "Well, why didn't somebody react? And then when it did come, why did it take three hours for reaction forces to show up and defend the Israeli population? Clearly, this was a setup. "It was designed to trigger the response that they wanted from the rest of the world, as well as from their own people, against the Muslims living in Gaza, the people they called 'Amalek,' animals." Patrick: "Is Israel engaging in a classic example of imperial hubris here? Imperial hubris?" MacGregor: "Well, of course. I mean, the arrogance and hubris are stifling. But that's because of their control of us. And I think that's what people have to understand. They say, when does this end? And I try to tell them when Israel no longer controls the United States armed forces, and that means no longer controls Congress and the presidency. Right now, they effectively control them."

Sense Receptor

36,356 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Noem: Well, you know, how the fake news works. They leave out some or most of the facts.. I hope people buy the book and they find out the truth of the story because the truth is that this was a working dog and it was not a puppy,
1:05

Noem: Well, you know, how the fake news works. They leave out some or most of the facts.. I hope people buy the book and they find out the truth of the story because the truth is that this was a working dog and it was not a puppy,

Acyn

2,116,558 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Gene Kelly screened "The Red Shoes" (1948) at least fifteen to twenty times to different executives at MGM to persuade them to accept the script for Vincent Minnelli's "An American in Paris" (1951). He was told by the executives that the success of "The Red Shoes" was mainly due to the lead actress being foreign & if it were an American actress in that part, the movie would have bombed. Here is Michael Powell talking about it: "The American distributors put our films on their shelves, saying they were too British: a calculated insult, difficult to refute, because they were British. That was the point of a picture like 'The Red Shoes' (1948). It could never have been made in Hollywood in 1947. Hollywood had made films about art and life and love, but I can't remember a single one, and I have total recall. Gene Kelly told me that he ran 'The Red Shoes' fifteen to twenty times for different executives at MGM before he got acceptance of his script for Vincente Minnelli's 'American in Paris', and then it was mainly because he had a foreign ballerina for the part- Leslie Caron. He was told that the success of 'The Red Shoes' was due to the girl being foreign. An American girl in the same part would have bombed. He didn't argue, but took the money and Leslie Caron and ran. The film was a huge success. I never saw it, but Gene told me that it was full of quotes from 'The Red Shoes'. Art! But it had Gene Kelly." ("A Life in Movies", Michael Powell, 1986) P.S: On this day, 78 years ago, "The Red Shoes" (1948) premiered in London, UK.
1:47

Gene Kelly screened "The Red Shoes" (1948) at least fifteen to twenty times to different executives at MGM to persuade them to accept the script for Vincent Minnelli's "An American in Paris" (1951). He was told by the executives that the success of "The Red Shoes" was mainly due to the lead actress being foreign & if it were an American actress in that part, the movie would have bombed. Here is Michael Powell talking about it: "The American distributors put our films on their shelves, saying they were too British: a calculated insult, difficult to refute, because they were British. That was the point of a picture like 'The Red Shoes' (1948). It could never have been made in Hollywood in 1947. Hollywood had made films about art and life and love, but I can't remember a single one, and I have total recall. Gene Kelly told me that he ran 'The Red Shoes' fifteen to twenty times for different executives at MGM before he got acceptance of his script for Vincente Minnelli's 'American in Paris', and then it was mainly because he had a foreign ballerina for the part- Leslie Caron. He was told that the success of 'The Red Shoes' was due to the girl being foreign. An American girl in the same part would have bombed. He didn't argue, but took the money and Leslie Caron and ran. The film was a huge success. I never saw it, but Gene told me that it was full of quotes from 'The Red Shoes'. Art! But it had Gene Kelly." ("A Life in Movies", Michael Powell, 1986) P.S: On this day, 78 years ago, "The Red Shoes" (1948) premiered in London, UK.

DepressedBergman

26,411 просмотров • 1 месяц назад