Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Remember during the 2019 Morocco tour when Harry was assigned to walk the center red carpet to inspect the Guard of Honour? It was straightforward ceremonial stuff - he’s ex-military, it was his role. Yet Meghan hovered right on the edge as closely as she could instead of stepping...

201,702 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

41 Kommentare

Profilbild von MeghansMole©️
MeghansMole©️vor 5 Monaten

@PAL007416180139 You missed the second part where they are about to go up the stairs and Meghan says fuck it and goes on the carpet

Profilbild von Queen Esther
Queen Esthervor 5 Monaten

@PAL007416180139

Profilbild von Sarah with-an-H-Town🦂
Sarah with-an-H-Town🦂vor 5 Monaten

Excellent post. Her behavior is appalling and embarrassing wherever she goes.

Profilbild von Queen Esther
Queen Esthervor 5 Monaten

Thank you. ♥️ The frustrating part is that it’s always the same pattern too. Every event somehow turns into awkward optics, attention seeking behaviour, or unnecessary drama instead of simply letting the occasion and the people involved shine.

Profilbild von Sarah with-an-H-Town🦂
Sarah with-an-H-Town🦂vor 5 Monaten

So true, it's exhausting even reading about it, much less living it. Those two are certifiable.

Profilbild von Defenestrate
Defenestratevor 5 Monaten

Viper got as close to the edge of that carpet as she possibly could too. There's a video of her barging ahead of Harry to shake hands with the Moroccan King, and a reporter is heard saying, "She's repugnant" because her rudeness is so hard to believe.

Profilbild von joy-ann
joy-annvor 5 Monaten

It was after this occasion that she insisted of keeping hold of his hand, she wasn't letting him do this again, she is a vile ignorant disrespectful cow, I cannot stand the tramp

Profilbild von Queen Esther
Queen Esthervor 5 Monaten

After that she probably decided she was never going to let herself be sidelined again, but constantly going ahead of Harry or clinging onto him only ended up making both of them look insecure, performative, and awkward for everyone watching.

Profilbild von Moreland
Morelandvor 5 Monaten

She had two "protocol watchers" making sure she acted appropriately. How embarrassing. She could have graciously walked a good meter away from the carpet, to separate herself from that ceremonial moment, instead she behaved like a jealous toddler. 😏

Profilbild von AdeleArthurSugarEater
AdeleArthurSugarEatervor 5 Monaten

She was DYING to tap that toe on that red carpet just for spite. THIS is how the treatment of this B should have continued-ignore her, keep her on the periphery & don't let her in. In today's news, that is exactly what is happening to her as we speak so karma is a bitch like her.

Profilbild von ⛈️ 🍵 Nina aka HRH Back Row Betty
⛈️ 🍵 Nina aka HRH Back Row Bettyvor 5 Monaten

Amazing how she followed instructions 🤭🤭🤭

Profilbild von Queen Esther
Queen Esthervor 5 Monaten

A rare historical moment honestly 😂

Profilbild von Handsewing1955
Handsewing1955vor 5 Monaten

Very poignantly written. Meghan thought she was better than Harry, equal to Catherine, and much more talented to work her position. I think she takes charge of their assignments etc. because she doesn’t trust her husband’s abilities. That’s how narcissists think.

Profilbild von Sam
Samvor 5 Monaten

If we are being honest here, Meghan never fitted and belonged anywhere. Not the Royal Family, Not the Fashion Industry, and certainly Not Hollywood. Her only fame was Suit and let's face it, she was unknown and the show ONLY got recognized because of who she married.

Profilbild von Duchess Daisy
Duchess Daisyvor 5 Monaten

Yep. Well said. I applauded her entry into the family but soon realised she was there to applaud herself and nobody else. I was very shocked. She had the WHOLE world at her feet. She could have achieved so so much for charities BUT she chose HERSELF over everything and everyone.

Profilbild von Katarina Brozovic+
Katarina Brozovic+vor 5 Monaten

OMG, also just noticed how inflated that balloon under her dress was that evening. Was she 18 (eighteen) months pregnant at that stage?

Profilbild von PamelaGT
PamelaGTvor 5 Monaten

@takebackusofa Perfectly said… They well put her in her place but she was furious. She looks ridiculous walking that close to the red carpet. What an idiot.

Profilbild von Gilly 🐢✨
Gilly 🐢✨vor 5 Monaten

On the other hand if TRF had just insisted on a longer engagement she would have washed out. I can’t imagine they didn’t know or discover some of her previous moves or controversies and just thought what really?

Profilbild von HunterHunty Hunted
HunterHunty Huntedvor 5 Monaten

HERE FFS

Profilbild von ManicPixie
ManicPixievor 5 Monaten

What Meghan still doesn’t understand is that Royalty OPERATES more like a corporation and not like Hollywood.

Profilbild von The Martian
The Martianvor 5 Monaten

it was SO FUNNY the look of being SO offended was priceless! then she walked AS CLOSE as she could to the red carpet & #henpeckedharry. like a SNL skit or something!

Profilbild von TRussell 🇺🇲
TRussell 🇺🇲vor 5 Monaten

Uhhh...diminishing "H" (my husband) has been the objective all along. As she must diminish anyone in her orbit in order to support her fragile ego.

Profilbild von girlfromoz
girlfromozvor 5 Monaten

@takebackusofa Trouble is she’s neither Hollywood nor Royalty. She’s tried both and failed both. Shallow and shameless.

Profilbild von DeniseRiedel
DeniseRiedelvor 5 Monaten

@HecatediRoma The late great Queen Elizabeth figured her out immediately, but Harry, being cucked by a man traveler, has a drug-addled brain and fell for the act.

Profilbild von Animal lover
Animal lovervor 5 Monaten

@Connie2835 I often wonder how the Lady worded it to M to keep her from walking on that red carpet, 😫 🤣

Profilbild von Lynn Heilmann
Lynn Heilmannvor 5 Monaten

Unlike Meghan, we have noticed that when William and Catherine do joint engagements, if it's his charity, etc., he goes first. If it's one of hers, she goes first. As it should be. Meghan wants to be first all the time no matter what the occasion.

Profilbild von fluke
flukevor 5 Monaten

Imagine being a Dlist actress in Hollywood whose only claim to fame was being #6 in the call sheet. Marries into the RF and thinking you can take over and be the star of the thousand yr old monarchy. Nevermind that she married the #6 in LoS at the time. 🤭

Profilbild von Jet
Jetvor 5 Monaten

Correct. She's very childish and self centred. Totally inappropriate to join our Royal family.

Profilbild von morag graham 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇬🇧
morag graham 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇬🇧vor 5 Monaten

And she was told to get off the red carpet she was not a happy bunny

Profilbild von Query
Queryvor 5 Monaten

Remember when all these people were saying Charles will do something following what the Sussexes did in Australia & Ukraine? We just had to wait until after the U.S. state visit. Bullshit, I always maintained Charles will do jack shit except allow them to exploit the monarchy.

Profilbild von Duchess Difficult
Duchess Difficultvor 5 Monaten

Christ she’s so cringe. Secondhand embarrassment from watching her self serving breeches of protocol. It makes her look like an idiot. Her desperate grabs at the spotlight only make her look foolish.

Profilbild von Marie Rogland
Marie Roglandvor 5 Monaten

Very well said

Profilbild von Queen Esther
Queen Esthervor 5 Monaten

♥️♥️♥️

Profilbild von Tropicallady
Tropicalladyvor 5 Monaten

Meg's behavior is appalling. She's a disgrace to that RF she married in & cheapens it. Thank goodness she ran away in time. Too much Damage control & the bully report by the Palace. I witness too many other commoners where they adapt their roles, some being Queen later in life.

Profilbild von maria melindra
maria melindravor 5 Monaten

I can only imagine the earful harry got that night....ooooff Her temper must of been red hot like her dress!! 😂

Profilbild von boom
boomvor 5 Monaten

@takebackusofa

Profilbild von Mrs. B
Mrs. Bvor 5 Monaten

Yep, she brings a tawdriness with her everywhere she goes.

Profilbild von Mom2Many
Mom2Manyvor 5 Monaten

P.S. I love this Turkish protocol lady being so firm in showing MM her place. More people should follow her example.

Profilbild von Miwa Sam
Miwa Samvor 5 Monaten

As a Moroccan and a fan of English history I was outraged by her ill-mannered, savage behavior in Morocco (making comments while eating, refusing the welcome date and milk, walking on the edges of the red carpet, greeting the king first, leaving without greeting the crown prince)

Profilbild von Mom2Many
Mom2Manyvor 5 Monaten

Diminishing H has been her goal since the beginning. She is so disrespectful of him & even though he’s a jerk of the 1st order, he is still a prince. She will never be royal nor does she have a clue about decorum or manners. You don’t have to know protocol to be classy.

Profilbild von Livia525
Livia525vor 5 Monaten

Meghan has something in common with Diana after all. Diana loved being the center of attention; she tried to outshine Charles at every moment. Diana had no understanding of the duty of monarchy; she just loved being the star of the show.

Ähnliche Videos

Meghan Markle could have had all of this. If she’d just accepted that the Crown wasn’t there to serve her, but that she was there to serve something much bigger than herself, she could have become one of the most significant royals in modern times. Coming from Hollywood, she had a front row seat to the exact world she was so desperate to impress. After years of chasing status in those circles, she found herself in a position where the very people she desperately wanted validation from would have been standing when she walked into the room because of the institution she represented. The thing she never got is that the respect isn’t for the individual. It’s for the Crown, the role, and the centuries of service behind it. Those who understand that thrive. Those who think they’re bigger than it? They crash and burn. A few years ago, when the monarchy was under real pressure and Catherine was fighting serious health issues, Harry and Meghan had a genuine chance to step up and build something positive. Instead they chose to wage war on the very institution that gave them their platform in the first place. They wanted the prominence without the protocol, the status without the hierarchy, and the influence without any accountability. The saddest part is Meghan couldn’t accept playing second fiddle to Catherine. In the end, refusing to accept her place in the institution is exactly what cost her the platform she had inside it. Pride really has undone a lot of people. And it might end up being the defining lesson of Meghan Markle’s whole story.

Queen Esther

457,343 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Oprah Winfrey said she called Meghan Markle in early 2018 asking for an interview and was told “it wasn’t the right time.” Now it’s being spun as if the palace blocked it. If Oprah was so interested in Meghan, what stopped her from interviewing her before Harry was even in the picture? Where was that interest when Meghan was just another working actress trying to make it? Where was the sit-down when she was deep in Suits, far from global headlines? No one needed palace permission back then. No one was “banned.” No palace. No restrictions. No “people in the room.” No one to “block” anything. You want to blame the palace as if it was some kind of silencing move, but you fail to understand that instead it exposes what this really is. Meghan Markle was simply not someone Oprah was prioritising for a major sit-down. Nor was Meghan Markle relevant enough for that level of attention. It’s also interesting how Meghan frames it as not being “allowed” to speak privately, with others present, as if that’s unusual. She was about to marry into one of the most scrutinised institutions in the world. Of course communications are structured. That’s not some shocking revelation, that’s standard. Then comes the key line. “Now we can speak freely.” “Now I can say yes.” So what changed? It only became “the right time” once she had the global platform, the title, and the leverage that came with the royal connection. You can’t rewrite this into a story about being silenced by the palace when the timeline shows something much simpler. The demand wasn’t there before Harry. The value wasn’t there before the royal family connection. And suddenly, after everything, we’re supposed to believe this was always about “not being allowed” rather than finally having something to sell. Let that sink it.

Queen Esther

149,986 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Meghan Markle infamous curtsy reenactment in the Netflix series was not a quirky anecdote. It was a glaring window into Meghan’s character, & it spectacularly backfired. By turning a simple gesture of respect into an over the top, sarcastic performance, complete with the mocking “Pleasure to meet you, Your Majesty,” she did not merely poke fun at royal protocol. She openly disrespected her husband’s grandmother and the cultural traditions she was marrying into. You do not have to adore the monarchy to show basic decency. Mocking it on a global stage is not empowerment. It is pettiness wrapped in self righteousness. It is contempt. What makes it worse is the attempt to sell this as innocence. She was not a sheltered teenager from another planet. She was a middle aged actress who had dated a prince, lived in the UK, and actively sought proximity to that world. She knew she was joining one of the most scrutinised families on earth. She could have asked. She could have researched. She could have practised quietly. Instead, she weaponised the moment years later. And Harry fares no better in this story. A man raised in palaces mentions curtsying in the car, yet apparently never bothers to explain what actually matters. Then he sits back while his wife mocks the moment on camera. Pretending she thought curtsying was some medieval parody is performative ignorance. That is not naïveté. It is affectation. Harry was complicit in the shade throwing, prioritising their grievance narrative over basic respect for his own family. What Meghan failed to understand is that respecting another culture does not diminish you. It elevates you. Courtesy is not submission. Learning customs is not erasure. When you marry into another family, another country, another culture, the basic adult response is to observe, learn, and show respect. Millions of people move across cultures every day. They learn greetings, gestures, and etiquette not because they are forced to, but because respect is universal. You honour others and in doing so you show character. Meghan chose the opposite. She treated unfamiliarity as something to sneer at, as if curiosity and humility were beneath her. The late Queen would not have cared about a perfect curtsy during their first meeting. She met presidents, dictators, pop stars, and children. She was pragmatic, warm, and famously forgiving of protocol mishaps. A genuine smile and a simple “Nice to meet you” would have been more than enough. Instead, Meghan chose theatrical disdain, reducing a lifetime of duty and service into a punchline for Netflix dollars. It was not funny. It was mean spirited, and it revealed someone who views other people’s customs as beneath her. That exaggerated curtsy was not for the Queen. It was for the audience Meghan always imagines watching her. The moment was not lived. It was stored, packaged, and later monetised. That is the pattern. Nothing is private. Everything is content. Every interaction is reduced to a punchline that flatters her and diminishes others. This moment was never really about a curtsy. It was about attitude. A woman secure in herself does not need to belittle someone else’s traditions to feel superior. She does not turn cultural difference into comedy and later into grievance. She adapts. She listens. She observes. That is how you gain respect without asking for it. If anything, that exaggerated curtsy made her look small, not modern. True confidence does not perform contempt. It practises respect quietly, even when the cameras are off. She did not merely reveal herself. She ruined herself, slowly and publicly, through moments like this. She did not need the press to torpedo her image. Her own words and performances did that for her. Respect is not about agreement. It is about not being gratuitously rude. Meghan’s mockery achieved the opposite. It made her appear insecure, arrogant, and unwilling to bridge any gap.

Queen Esther

185,709 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

One would think America isn’t exactly fond of the British monarchy. After all, we’ve seen the “No King” protests (even if they weren’t aimed at Charles), and Harry and Meghan have been living here for years with surprisingly little fanfare. You’d assume two older royals showing up would barely move the needle. But the way Americans turned out for King Charles was something else entirely. It wasn’t just the crowds. It was the warmth, the respect, and the strikingly bipartisan welcome he received from leaders on both sides of the aisle. The message was unmistakable: it’s the monarchy itself that captivates people, not any one individual. And that’s where Meghan Markle miscalculated. She stepped into those tours, saw the crowds, and convinced herself it was about her. It wasn’t. It was the gravitational pull of the institution. Had she stayed, done the role, and understood what she represented instead of trying to compete with it, those same crowds would have shown up for her too. Instead, reality delivered a quiet verdict. Her own country meets her with indifference, while embracing the very institution she tried to diminish. King Charles’s reception was a reminder that the monarchy’s light has never belonged to one person. It’s built on centuries of duty, continuity, and history. It’s a simple lesson. Don’t confuse borrowed brilliance for your own. Some spotlights were never yours to claim. She bet against the Crown and lost. The throne didn’t need her then, and it doesn’t now. The monarchy’s light never did. 😌

Queen Esther

116,351 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Here’s my analysis of why MEGHAN MARKLE LIES with such ease and how the Oprah interview exposed it. There are lies that come from panic. There are lies that come from confusion. Then there are lies that come from entitlement. The kind that slip out smoothly, confidently, without a flicker of worry, because the person saying them believes consequences are for other people. That is exactly what Meghan Markle displayed in the Oprah interview when she claimed she and Harry were married “three days before” their wedding, with the Archbishop of Canterbury. She didn’t frame it as a private vow or a romantic moment. She framed it as an actual marriage. And she did it on global television with a smile, like she was sharing a charming secret. But it wasn’t charming. It wasn’t harmless. And it certainly wasn’t true. It was a lie told with ease because she expected everyone else to absorb it without questioning it. The Lie Was Designed to Sound Like a Fairytale, Not a Fact This is how Meghan operates. She doesn’t just lie, she packages the lie. She wraps it in sentiment and sweetness so the audience reacts emotionally instead of logically. She didn’t say “We exchanged vows privately.” That would be plausible, normal, and not legally loaded. She said “We got married.” That choice of words matters. It changes everything. It turns a private moment into a legal and religious claim. It drags an institution into her story. And it creates pressure on other people to defend themselves. That is the real point. Meghan’s lies are never just personal. They are strategic. This Was Not a “Little Mistake” Because It Had Real Consequences Anyone trying to defend her will call it a misunderstanding. But a misunderstanding does not involve naming the Archbishop of Canterbury and implying a secret marriage happened before a globally televised wedding. Her statement instantly created two outcomes. 1) It cornered the Archbishop into cleaning up her mess By claiming he “married” them days earlier, Meghan effectively placed him in a position where silence would look like confirmation and denial would look like embarrassment. So he had to respond. That is the cruelty in it. It’s not just that she lied. It’s that she lied in a way that forced a senior religious figure to publicly correct her. She put a man of office into the role of damage control, because she wanted a romantic headline. That is not a “slip.” That is reckless and selfish. 2) It undermined the legitimacy of the official wedding Their actual wedding was not private. It was not hidden. It was a historical public event. So why tell the world the “real” marriage happened earlier? Because it reframes the real wedding into something performative, staged, and secondary. It whispers to the audience: That wasn’t for us, that was for them. It’s the same pattern every time. If the institution celebrates her, she uses it. If the institution limits her, she devalues it. Why She Lies With Ease: Because Her Lies Are Tools, Not Errors Meghan does not lie like someone afraid of being caught. She lies like someone who believes truth is flexible.

Queen Esther

110,252 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Brilliant 👏 👏 I believe it was this Pap-walk in Canada, with an obvious doll that forced Harry to leave the UK and go be with her. Time line of events Meghan leaves first and flew to Canada around 10 January 2020 after the “we’re stepping back” announcement. She stayed on Vancouver Island with the boy we are told is Archie. The Sandringham Summit took place on 13th January 2020. Harry attended in person in the UK along with Senior Royals. Meghan did not attend (only expected to dial in, but didn’t in the end) Around 20th Jan pictures and a video popped up online in the media of Meghan doing the now infamous Papwalk. She had remained behind closed doors up until this point. Now regardless what others say, I do NOT BELIEVE that was a real child in that harness/sling. Then around the 21st Harry leaves the UK and goes to Canada! 🤔 We don’t have any evidence Harry had a fixed plan to go to Canada immediately after, it was assumed. The summit outcome and timing of his departure were likely still fluid at that point and given I believe the boy is his and not hers, remains here. So who controlled the narrative in those 7 days between summit and departure... Meghan! Watching this video its my belief this was a veiled threat to Harry... it was saying 'if you do not leave and come here, I will expose the truth'. Meghan knew by doing this walk Harry and the RF would see it, she called the media to film this, she knew where to look and was grinning the whole time. If you watch it closely I defy anyone to say this was a real child in that sling. I believe the boy stayed in the UK (I have done various videos on this in more detail to explain why). Meghan in her insecurity of losing control of Harry and what she's grifted to secure, put this out knowing he would see it! Harry was possibly deciding how to best navigate the whole situation and this move by her made the decision for him!

Emz

432,134 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Remember when Meghan Markle told Oprah that she and Harry were actually married three days before the Windsor ceremony. She presented the three days prior moment as if that was the real marriage and made the Windsor ceremony sound like it was just a performance for the world. Then the Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby had to step in and make it clear that the only legal marriage took place on 19 May 2018. He explained that anything different would have required him to sign the marriage register with false information which is a criminal offence in the United Kingdom. Making a knowingly false statement in relation to a marriage can lead to prosecution and even imprisonment. No Archbishop is going to risk that for anyone. She was not afraid to make a claim that placed a senior figure of the Church in a difficult position. She counted on him staying silent as many others have done in the past. Instead he had to clarify the truth because the law does not bend for feelings or storylines. Meghan Markle lies boldly as always because she is so used to people staying silent and letting her get away with it. This time she chose the wrong person and ended up exposing herself. The need to lie about something as this and to drag the Archbishop into it says everything about her. It makes you wonder whether she has ever told the truth about anything at all. The only honest line she has ever uttered might be when she admitted “I am such a fraud.”

Queen Esther

558,711 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten