Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Remember when Meghan Markle told Oprah that she and Harry were actually married three days before the Windsor ceremony. She presented the three days prior moment as if that was the real marriage and made the Windsor ceremony sound like it was just a performance for the world. Then...

558,711 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

42 Kommentare

Profilbild von Mary C
Mary Cvor 10 Monaten

@takebackusofa Worse, Harold went a long with the lie - and they wonder why the RF wants nothing to do with them

Profilbild von Queen Esther
Queen Esthervor 10 Monaten

@MaryCroy0816 @takebackusofa Of course he went along with it -Harold was a spineless, useless idiot that Markle used from the start.

Profilbild von Defenestrate
Defenestratevor 10 Monaten

Squatting in the chicken pen among the chicken shit while "pregnant." Any pregnant woman knows better than to expose her unborn baby to germs and filth that can be transmitted to the baby.

Profilbild von Queen Esther
Queen Esthervor 10 Monaten

If she were truly expecting, she wouldn’t be putting herself in situations like that. This just adds to the suspicion that she wasn’t carrying the baby herself.

Profilbild von Defenestrate
Defenestratevor 10 Monaten

I was on the fence for a while in the beginning about Markle being pregnant. There's much more evidence that she didn't give birth, than she did.

Profilbild von Topical Delusion
Topical Delusionvor 10 Monaten

Meg, your wedding rehearsal was NOT the marriage rite. You lied to yourself that it was. Then you lied to the world. Signed, the World.

Profilbild von Queen Esther
Queen Esthervor 10 Monaten

This is classic Markle - lies, scripts, and self-serving narratives all the way.

Profilbild von Tropicallady
Tropicalladyvor 10 Monaten

Oh, well. Hold your horses, the LIES Meghan will tell and sell after Thomas her once oh so boldly loving dad dies is much more offensive with big, big accusations that will follow. You couldnt believe it all. But wait & see, what spoiled brat Meg is capable of. 🐍

Profilbild von Queen Esther
Queen Esthervor 10 Monaten

Oh, I’ve been saying the same thing.

Profilbild von Theresa Longo Fans
Theresa Longo Fansvor 10 Monaten

She is unhinged. Oprah has seen a lot and will do almost anything to get the story. Oprah got it good here. To be honest as tough on Oprah as we are, she fully exposed MM

Profilbild von Imane
Imanevor 10 Monaten

and now she's selling a candle with the real date😂😂😂😂, so she's basically calling herself a liar

Profilbild von KSchmitty
KSchmittyvor 10 Monaten

The only time she's ever been honest 🔥

Profilbild von 🥶 Strolling Vagabond 🥶
🥶 Strolling Vagabond 🥶vor 10 Monaten

'The Spectacle wedding' which was optional , was something that the divorced attention whore insisted on having. Megsy was also advised by the late Queen to avoid a virginal white wedding dress, seeing that it wasn't her first rodeo. But the yacht girl knew better..🤡

Profilbild von Katherine
Katherinevor 10 Monaten

After MM made that claim several church members asked their bishop to perform an outdoor ceremony for their wedding, which is not permitted by the CoE. Wedding ceremonies are only performed in the church. Yes, MM lied. Nothing is sacred to her. She'll lie about anything.

Profilbild von Devora
Devoravor 10 Monaten

This was so gross. She basically said she was above the whole royalty thing. Now she asks her staff to announce her when she enters a room. She's such a fraud.

Profilbild von daisychick
daisychickvor 10 Monaten

‘This spectacle, this performance’ referring to the wedding with all bells and whistles SHE demanded from the royal family.

Profilbild von Queen Esther
Queen Esthervor 10 Monaten

Exactly! The only person who needed the cameras, the theatrics, and the over the top display was Meghan herself. She wanted every bit of that extravaganza and she loved the attention that came with it.

Profilbild von LJ🌸
LJ🌸vor 10 Monaten

And Harry just sat there in silence knowing she was bullshitting! Appalling.

Profilbild von Stella henworth
Stella henworthvor 10 Monaten

If the wedding was such a spectacle then why did they need it. It tells you a lot about how she feels about religion too if she can so easily lie about it. The fly who landed on her had it right, she is a lying shite

Profilbild von Laurie Syme
Laurie Symevor 10 Monaten

The bitch lied! 🤥

Profilbild von Queen Esther
Queen Esthervor 10 Monaten

Always

Profilbild von ChiJavier
ChiJaviervor 10 Monaten

Why do people let her get away with her lies though??? Threatening people with cancellation, firing, lawsuits. I think she’s been doing this sort of bullying/harrasment for years inc with her first and second husbands from whom we heard nothing at all. And her life when she was pregnant and there was a little girl all but had been erased. Who’s behind all these giving Markle that sort of upper hand, power even??? It’s crazy.

Profilbild von mutha ship
mutha shipvor 10 Monaten

If you look at the Spencer family website there’s actually a story of Diana’s ancestor getting married 3 days before the big wedding, taking place around 1800. Coincidence you think? Kid you not it’s an easy find. 🤔

Profilbild von Wren McCoy
Wren McCoyvor 10 Monaten

My favorite thing about this clip is how Oprah looks away, won’t make eye contact, and mumbles a lackluster “ohhhh”. She knew it was a bullshit lie. Harry knew it too, that’s why he interrupted her to start singing “just the 3 of us”. Harry KNEW it was wrong and he let her do it.

Profilbild von Nanda
Nandavor 10 Monaten

@RoyalFamily enables the big fat liar as they allow her to continue to dupe the public. When will they n @KensingtonRoyal put their feet down n say Enough is Enough to a zlisted starlet con who continues to besmirch them as she merches on their titles?

Profilbild von Louise
Louisevor 10 Monaten

It wasn’t just the chickens producing shit in that interview. I remember us literally laughing out loud seeing her blatantly lie - no way the Archbishop performed their real ceremony days before…what embarrassment she caused him!!

Profilbild von Sarah Bromley
Sarah Bromleyvor 10 Monaten

If this had been true, then we should've demanded a refund from H &M themselves for any taxpayer money they spent on the wedding. Ridiculous. They exist in their own fantasy world.

Profilbild von Suzy Que
Suzy Quevor 10 Monaten

They had a ceremony 3 days before the legal marriage, where they exchanged vows which meant more to them than the spectacle for the world, what’s hard to understand??

Profilbild von Beks of October
Beks of Octobervor 10 Monaten

Because nothing has ever been done about her lies. She faces no consequences. Other people are following her strategy. They’ve seen it work for her and now lawmakers are doing it. It’s deplorable and I hope they all get rabid crotch rot.

Profilbild von Louise
Louisevor 10 Monaten

This was just plain laughable, and watching Oprah’s reaction, she wasn’t believing a word either. M made herself look ridiculous

Profilbild von Giovanna
Giovannavor 10 Monaten

Absolutely a Markle lie and what was Meg trying to prove as it never happened, the Archbishop would have been defrocked, she tried to make fools out of the British people. The Archbishop Ed could have been imprisoned but Meg did not care but making points with Oprah

Profilbild von Giovanna
Giovannavor 10 Monaten

Disgusting liars, and Oprah sucked it up. The archbishop at first tried to say Meg was confused, she wasn't confused, finally he had to say it was a lie because he could not perform a wedding without 2 witnesses. Meg wanted the Brits to feel like fools for celebrating the Church.

Profilbild von Angela, Princess of Avril
Angela, Princess of Avrilvor 10 Monaten

Megs takes plots of sitcoms & pretends she lived them. This particular tale has similarities to an episode of the sitcom, "Mad About You" where the couple decided to have a private ceremony just for themselves, & then the big wedding was for everyone else. Oh, that Meggy. 😂

Profilbild von Dr. EarnedNotGiven
Dr. EarnedNotGivenvor 10 Monaten

The everyone stays silent is the critical part here Actually it is complicity We all play our part in allowing to let them walk free and unpunished Valid for politicians, criminals, corporates etc ...

Profilbild von Leah Rabin לאה רבין
Leah Rabin לאה רביןvor 10 Monaten

This incident alone highlighted that Meghan was particularly unsuited for marriage to a Royal Duke. Blithely stating that the Archbishop committed a criminal offence (which he was forced to emphatically deny) because she thought it would sound exciting on an American TV show.

Profilbild von betty kettley
betty kettleyvor 10 Monaten

And doughnut boy went along with it he’s as nuts as she is !!

Profilbild von 🇦🇺Duchess of Nonsense🇦🇺🦕🦖
🇦🇺Duchess of Nonsense🇦🇺🦕🦖vor 10 Monaten

She is a compulsive liar 🤥. The sooner people recognize that the sooner they will not give her air time.

Profilbild von Kathleen Ferguson
Kathleen Fergusonvor 10 Monaten

M appears to suffer from Pseudologia fantastica, also known as pathological lying. It is a psychiatric phenomenon characterised by habitual, compulsive lying. Individuals with this condition often believe their lies to be true. A kneeling flight attendant comes to mind. 😜

Profilbild von Just Saying
Just Sayingvor 10 Monaten

I hate it that she never gets called out for her lies. She has never sat down with a real journalist and given a real interview.

Profilbild von Meandme233
Meandme233vor 10 Monaten

And now, the performative wedding they forced upon her, where she wasn´t allowed to bring her family, has earned a candle, reminding us of one of the most special days in her life... She is hilarious, she does not even remember her lies.

Profilbild von Marie Byrd
Marie Byrdvor 10 Monaten

This lie was one of 17 provable lies she and Harry told in one single interview. That’s seems almost impossible but not for those two.

Profilbild von Mon Petit Chou
Mon Petit Chouvor 10 Monaten

This is such a well-written post. Her lies and manipulations are such an integral aspects of her personality that no one should ever trust her.

Ähnliche Videos

Prof. Stella Okunna has revealed on Gbam Interview that when Peter Obi appointed her as the commission for information in Anambra State, she was scared because she did not know who Peter Obi was and the character he possessed. Prof. Stella explained that she had not met Peter Obi before she was appointed as the Commissioner for information and the day she met him for the first time, was the day he swore her and other appointees into the Anambra state civil service. She said she wanted to turn down the offer because she did not know what kind of person he was and if he is someone who lies but she was persuaded by her family to take the job. She explained that the first day she had a meeting with Peter Obi, she told him that as his commissioner for information, she would not tell lies on his behalf or forge any information to paint him as a saint in the eyes of the public. Prof. Stella said when Peter Obi hears this, he smiled and told her that she will not have to worry about that when working with him and he would make sure that nothing like that happens in his administration. She further revealed that throughout her time working with him, Peter Obi kept to his words and didn't ask her to publish any false information as the Commissioner for information and his Chief of Staff. She concluded by calling Peter Obi a world class Governor. Admin Ekwulobia. oseni rufai OJY OKPE charles aniagolu please invite this lady to hear first hand from her

OBIARAERI, Nnaemeka Onyeka.

94,482 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

I genuinely cannot understand how someone can watch this story and still stand there, looking at two women, and somehow decide that the wrong one is the victim. On one side, you have a girl (Yıldız) who has been mistreated her entire life. Since the moment she was born, she was treated like a sacrifice for a conflict she was never even part of and later we find out that this conflict never even existed. Her right to study was taken from her. She was pushed into a marriage at a very young age just imagine being six, seven, eight years old, living in fear of being tied to someone you don’t even know. She was treated like a servant in her own home, by the very people she thought were her family. And just when she gets close to the happiness she dreamed of, the man she was engaged to shows up with another wife. She gets mistreated by that wife, by his family, and even (unintentionally) by him, because he was trying to run away from his own feelings, and that only caused her more heartbreak. The whole world was literally against her. She fought through all of that, only to find out in the end that everything she suffered for was based on something that wasn’t even real. Her entire life was built on a lie. That she isn’t even part of that family that she has literally no one in this world. Now on the other side… You have a girl (Melek) who, yes, was taken from her biological mother but she was raised by loving parents. She had everything anyone could wish for: education, freedom, a happy childhood, a healthy environment. She lived her life, fell in love, went out, made choices and no one questioned her, no one controlled her. And then what did she do? She found out that her man was engaged to another woman before marrying her (and even saw him marry her) and instead of holding on to her dignity, she chose to stay, to fight for a man who lied to her, to hold onto a marriage he tried to end multiple times. She used her unborn child to keep him tied to her. She lied constantly, and her excuse was that she was “protecting her marriage” a marriage that was already broken from the moment Serhat removed that ring at the airport in episode one. She tried to hand Yıldız (a woman who had already suffered enough) over to dangerous people. Then she found out the truth about her own birth (that her father ra*ped her mother.)And still no empathy. No moment of humanity toward her own mother. All she cared about was herself. And even though none of this had anything to do with Yıldız, she still found a way to blame it on her. Instead of holding her father accountable, she went and made a deal with him to get rid of Yıldız. She literally made a deal with the devil just to hurt Yıldız one more time. And after all of that… you want me to feel sorry for her? You want me to call her a victim? I honestly cannot believe we are living on the same planet with people who see this and still say, “she’s the victim.” Not morally. Not logically. Not emotionally. There is no world where this makes sense. It’s like watching someone clearly cause harm, and still calling them the victim and actually BELIEVING it. #HalefKöklerinÇağrısı

Maurora🫦

10,530 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Oprah Winfrey said she called Meghan Markle in early 2018 asking for an interview and was told “it wasn’t the right time.” Now it’s being spun as if the palace blocked it. If Oprah was so interested in Meghan, what stopped her from interviewing her before Harry was even in the picture? Where was that interest when Meghan was just another working actress trying to make it? Where was the sit-down when she was deep in Suits, far from global headlines? No one needed palace permission back then. No one was “banned.” No palace. No restrictions. No “people in the room.” No one to “block” anything. You want to blame the palace as if it was some kind of silencing move, but you fail to understand that instead it exposes what this really is. Meghan Markle was simply not someone Oprah was prioritising for a major sit-down. Nor was Meghan Markle relevant enough for that level of attention. It’s also interesting how Meghan frames it as not being “allowed” to speak privately, with others present, as if that’s unusual. She was about to marry into one of the most scrutinised institutions in the world. Of course communications are structured. That’s not some shocking revelation, that’s standard. Then comes the key line. “Now we can speak freely.” “Now I can say yes.” So what changed? It only became “the right time” once she had the global platform, the title, and the leverage that came with the royal connection. You can’t rewrite this into a story about being silenced by the palace when the timeline shows something much simpler. The demand wasn’t there before Harry. The value wasn’t there before the royal family connection. And suddenly, after everything, we’re supposed to believe this was always about “not being allowed” rather than finally having something to sell. Let that sink it.

Queen Esther

149,986 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

“Saving myself for marriage was a waste.” Caller: “How do I deal with the bitterness and resentment growing toward my husband? I feel like he ruined sex for me. I grew up very religious. Nothing fun in the bedroom until marriage. I met him at 27 and we got married at 30. But our honeymoon felt more like a vacation than a honeymoon. He initiated maybe once the entire trip. The aggression, the lust, the passion… it just isn’t there. And I keep having this thought: If this was what sex was going to be like, I could have been having fun in my 20s. What was the point?” Dr. John Delony: “That’s not stupid at all. Not even a tiny bit. In religious communities especially, sex gets put on this pedestal. This pinnacle thing that’s supposed to change your life. Then their husband is tired or doesn’t have the libido they expected, and they look in the mirror and think, ‘It must be me. What’s wrong with me? Why doesn’t he desire me?’ And that starts a spiral that can become really hard to get a hold of.” And this is where the story gets deeper. The hard truth: She may not actually be angry that she waited. She may be angry because she was promised that waiting would lead to a specific experience and reality didn’t deliver it. She was taught that if she waited, marriage would unlock the intimacy, passion, and desire she had been told to expect. But marriage doesn’t come with a guaranteed libido. And a wedding ring can’t manufacture chemistry, confidence, communication, attraction, or sexual compatibility. That creates a painful realization: She traded one set of expectations for another and neither matched reality. But there’s another uncomfortable truth. Her husband’s lack of initiation doesn’t automatically mean she isn’t attractive or desirable. People have different libidos. Some struggle with shame around sex. Some carry their own religious conditioning into marriage. Some simply don’t experience desire in the way their partner expects. So the question can’t just be, “Why doesn’t he want me?” It has to become: “What is happening between us, and are we both willing to understand it and work on it?” Because resentment will turn a bedroom problem into a marriage problem. And she has every right to grieve the experience she thought she was going to have. But she also has a choice now. She can spend years calculating whether waiting was “worth it”… or she can stop mourning the sex life she imagined and start having the uncomfortable conversation required to build the one she actually wants.

DAVE

22,666 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Meghan Markle infamous curtsy reenactment in the Netflix series was not a quirky anecdote. It was a glaring window into Meghan’s character, & it spectacularly backfired. By turning a simple gesture of respect into an over the top, sarcastic performance, complete with the mocking “Pleasure to meet you, Your Majesty,” she did not merely poke fun at royal protocol. She openly disrespected her husband’s grandmother and the cultural traditions she was marrying into. You do not have to adore the monarchy to show basic decency. Mocking it on a global stage is not empowerment. It is pettiness wrapped in self righteousness. It is contempt. What makes it worse is the attempt to sell this as innocence. She was not a sheltered teenager from another planet. She was a middle aged actress who had dated a prince, lived in the UK, and actively sought proximity to that world. She knew she was joining one of the most scrutinised families on earth. She could have asked. She could have researched. She could have practised quietly. Instead, she weaponised the moment years later. And Harry fares no better in this story. A man raised in palaces mentions curtsying in the car, yet apparently never bothers to explain what actually matters. Then he sits back while his wife mocks the moment on camera. Pretending she thought curtsying was some medieval parody is performative ignorance. That is not naïveté. It is affectation. Harry was complicit in the shade throwing, prioritising their grievance narrative over basic respect for his own family. What Meghan failed to understand is that respecting another culture does not diminish you. It elevates you. Courtesy is not submission. Learning customs is not erasure. When you marry into another family, another country, another culture, the basic adult response is to observe, learn, and show respect. Millions of people move across cultures every day. They learn greetings, gestures, and etiquette not because they are forced to, but because respect is universal. You honour others and in doing so you show character. Meghan chose the opposite. She treated unfamiliarity as something to sneer at, as if curiosity and humility were beneath her. The late Queen would not have cared about a perfect curtsy during their first meeting. She met presidents, dictators, pop stars, and children. She was pragmatic, warm, and famously forgiving of protocol mishaps. A genuine smile and a simple “Nice to meet you” would have been more than enough. Instead, Meghan chose theatrical disdain, reducing a lifetime of duty and service into a punchline for Netflix dollars. It was not funny. It was mean spirited, and it revealed someone who views other people’s customs as beneath her. That exaggerated curtsy was not for the Queen. It was for the audience Meghan always imagines watching her. The moment was not lived. It was stored, packaged, and later monetised. That is the pattern. Nothing is private. Everything is content. Every interaction is reduced to a punchline that flatters her and diminishes others. This moment was never really about a curtsy. It was about attitude. A woman secure in herself does not need to belittle someone else’s traditions to feel superior. She does not turn cultural difference into comedy and later into grievance. She adapts. She listens. She observes. That is how you gain respect without asking for it. If anything, that exaggerated curtsy made her look small, not modern. True confidence does not perform contempt. It practises respect quietly, even when the cameras are off. She did not merely reveal herself. She ruined herself, slowly and publicly, through moments like this. She did not need the press to torpedo her image. Her own words and performances did that for her. Respect is not about agreement. It is about not being gratuitously rude. Meghan’s mockery achieved the opposite. It made her appear insecure, arrogant, and unwilling to bridge any gap.

Queen Esther

185,709 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

I love it when rude customers get humbled. She was being all disrespectful about it until her card got declined. Going to a store with only $20 on your card while I try to buy $150 worth of things isn’t anything I would ever do, it’s embarrassing to thing people even do this and worst yet get rude about it. I’ve dealt with arrogant customers before and they talk themselves up and try to belittle me to make themselves feel good about themselves. At the insurance company I had a woman call in about repairs to her car, she claimed the car was stolen and wrecked. I start getting details of what happened all the while she was whining and complaining about the repair process, complaining about why it’s taking so long to have the car inspected and such. I tried to tell her it was because I was waiting on necessary paperwork like the police report. Turns out she never filed a police report for this single car accident because the person who took the car and wrecked it was her own son. She wanted it filed under a stolen car because it was a comprehensive coverage claim with only a $100 deductible. A collision claim which this was, carries a $1000 deductible that she didn’t have. I tried to explain that that to her and she got belligerent saying that if I had kids I would understand. I told her that has nothing to do with it and what happened was her son drove the car into a tree which is a collision loss. A theft claim only applies if the police were notified and made a report, also she would have to press charges against him for actual theft as well. She was mad because I humbled her, I’m not stupid I knew what happened. I even saw on her policy how he got a few tickets and she removed him as a driver because her rates went up and since he was an excluded driver I wouldn’t be paying for her damages anyways and she hung up on me.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

106,875 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

My way of thinking about this topic is asking do we want to solve issues with porn being a substitute for real sex in marriage the easy way or the hard way? Absolutely men have a responsibility to police themselves and not let the behavior of women dictate their own behavior - period. Along side of that we can simultaneously acknowledge the reality that men are most attracted to fit, feminine women. A husband married to a wife that isn’t fit and feminine is a husband who has a problem. The problem is he likes fit and feminine but doesn’t have access to it in his marriage. The problem is amplified if his wife is also a bitter bitch who uses sex as control mechanism. He finds himself between a rock and a hard place. He has normal male desires - normal male desires aren’t being fulfilled. Now what? Do the best he can to ignore his desires or morph them into other desires? Have an affair? Use porn as the next best substitute? All hard options. Alternatively - he can make it clear to his wife his expectations based on his normal male desires and his wife can respond to them - which is the easy way when the wife is as invested in the marriage as the husband is. I talk about this topic on this account all the time because I’m absolutely convinced if both husband and wife put the focus on the easy way - the hard way doesn’t even have to be a topic of consideration or conversation. The video I’m sharing with this post was a video Avis’s coach took last week while she was working with Avis as she’s preparing to get back into competing later this year. Avis is preparing to start competing again because she has the same attitude getting ready to turn 52 as she had in her, 20’s, 30’s, 40’s and so on. That attitude is she wants to make it as easy as she can for me to be happily married to her. I told her a long time ago what my expectations of her were that I believed would provide the most insulation to our marriage and make it as easy as possible for me to be married to her. Staying fit and feminine were a huge part of those expectations. She didn’t try to make it out as if I was asking something unreasonable of her - she didn’t say my male desires were gross and that I needed to talk to Jesus about them - she didn’t go complain to her friends what a terrible husband I was - she didn’t threaten me with divorce over my expectations or any of the other things too many wives often do to try to control their marriages. She simply said she would give it her best and throughout 3+ decades of marriage and the birthing and raising of 3 children over those decades - that is exactly what she did and continues to do. However much husbands might think they can learn from me and what I share on this account - I think wives could learn 10x more from Avis and how to make their husbands life easy instead of hard. The best defense against porn ruining a marriage is being in a marriage that’s easy to be in. -R

Rob and Avis Ramble

130,703 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

The Extraordinary Grandiosity of Meghan Markle. The disconnect in this interview is astonishing. Meghan says she already had influence during her time on Suits. She talks about people monetising what she wore and how intentional she was in using fashion to elevate brands and designers, almost presenting herself as someone uniquely thoughtful about the opportunities clothing gave her. And somehow, throughout all of it, there is barely any acknowledgement that marrying into one of the most famous institutions in the world might have had something to do with the level of attention she received. Instead, the story becomes: Meghan had the influence. Meghan elevated brands. People monetised Meghan. Meghan used fashion strategically. Meghan was the phenomenon all along. She genuinely believes the influence was always hers. The sheer narcissism of it is astonishing. The constant rewriting of the narrative so that Meghan is always the benefactor rather than the beneficiary, always the one elevating others rather than the one being elevated, is frankly laughable. Royal women have long understood that what they wear sends a message. They have used fashion to champion homegrown talent, support local businesses on tours and bring attention to causes bigger than themselves. They recognised that the platform wasn’t about them. It was about how they could use it in service of something greater. Meghan, on the other hand, often appeared far more interested in established luxury labels and big fashion houses. Yet listening to this interview, she speaks as though she was the one intentionally elevating others, as though this level of thoughtfulness and strategy began with Meghan Markle. To understand the disconnect, if Meghan Markle already had that level of influence from Suits onwards, where were the sell outs? Which brands couldn’t keep stock because Rachel Zane wore a blouse? Where were the websites dedicated to tracking Meghan Markle’s outfits before she became a working royal? And if the influence truly belonged to her alone, where is that same level of impact today? There seems to be no gratitude for the extraordinary platform she was given. No recognition that she stepped into an institution that amplified everything she touched. Just the conviction that she was the gift. Everything is always about Meghan. The influence was hers. The generosity was hers. The strategy was hers. The impact was hers. It’s an astonishing level of self importance to walk away from one of the biggest platforms in the world genuinely believing that everyone else was benefiting from you, rather than recognising just how much you had benefited from them.

Queen Esther

101,050 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Sometimes the customer wakes up in the wrong side of the bed and takes it out on me. This man went to order a coffee at his local McDonald’s and when I tried to see where the worker was rude, I only saw the customer being impatient and rude yet for whatever reason the customer thinks it’s the worker’s fault. How do you feel with the grumpy people? I have a feeling he’s not a morning person. On many occasions I dealt with the rudest people. This woman called into the pizza shop with a horrible attitude, it confused me because the way she was talking I would have thought I knew her and did her wrong before. But that wasn’t the case she was just being a jerk for no reason. She starts off the interaction with unreasonable demands. It was already 10 mins till closing and she asks if I had any mess up orders that I made wrong or customers just didn’t pick up. I tells her no, then she asked if she could get a cheese pizza slice but wanted it fresh out the oven. I told her all the slices we had were made within a half hour and if she wanted a fresh cheese slice I would have to make a whole cheese pizza and charge her accordingly since she would be my last customer of the day and that I would have to end up throwing it away. She said if that’s the case let her buy a slice and expected me to give her the whole pizza for $3. I declined once again and told her I couldn’t do that because I was done making pizza for the day anyways I would never make a fresh pie at the end of the night. No matter how much she argued I told her that whatever slices I still had was all I could offer. However if she wanted a whole pizza I could do that. She argued for another 2 minutes and gave up, deciding to get a pepperoni slice and I hurried up and heated it and have it to get. Then I told her we were closing and kindly asked her to leave. She ended up calling the next day complaining about her slice of pizza and how rude the worker was which was me, she just didn’t know it. I told her I would have done the same and after she argued again she just hung up. She was arguing in hopes I would have gave it to her for free but this isn’t my first rodeo.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

82,250 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

#山根涼羽 Zunchan was clarifying something she said in her seitansai speech that seems to have been misunderstood after only a certain part was clipped and shared online. What she meant was never that AKB was “better” than KLP, or that she was criticizing KLP, Malaysia, or the people around her there. She explained that she is genuinely grateful for the environment she had in KLP, and at the same time, her experience in Malaysia made her realize how many things in AKB she had previously taken for granted. With KLP, they were essentially building a 48 Group and its idol culture from the ground up in a place where that system and environment were not already established. There were a lot of fun experiences, but naturally there were also difficult things that came with having to create something from scratch. Because she went through that experience, when she returned to AKB, she became more aware of all the things that were already established and prepared for the members there, and it made her feel grateful for the AKB environment as well. She specifically emphasized that this was NOT about saying one place was better than the other. She said that both places were wonderful to her, both were places she loved, and that was what she had wanted to convey. She also mentioned that some Malaysian fans had misunderstood what she meant, and clarified that she never intended for her words to be used to attack anyone. So I hope people can listen to what she is actually saying here rather than judging her based only on a clipped portion of her speech. Her point was about gaining a new appreciation for both environments through her experiences in each of them, not putting one down to praise the other.

Tina 🍉

17,578 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat