正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Remember the grave concerns that Judge Beverly Cannone had when the Commonwealth falsely and prejudicially represented that “embedded within the bumper to [Karen Read’s] vehicle is pieces of cocktail glass” during pretrial litigation? Me neither. This greatly prejudiced #KarenRead to the public and potential jury pool before she’d ever...

OliviaLambo_'s profile picture

Olivia

28,182 subscribers

83,550 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生新闻政治教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The Commonwealth literally retooled and changed its entire vehicle data analysis & timeline in response to the defense’s theory. They changed their entire accident reconstruction theory AND their vehicle data theory. And this is after already changing it from the first trial. They didn’t turn this over to the defense until a week ago—well into trial already, and over 3 months after they signed their certificate of compliance, affirming that they’d turned over and produced all discovery in accordance with Rule 14. They’re supposed to be pursuing justice, or pursuing the truth. The truth doesn’t change. This is such a brazen, shameless and disgusting display of how corrupt and evil these people are. They’re so shameless that they don’t even care if the whole world is seeing them trying to prosecute an innocent woman using fake evidence. Hank Brennan’s not here for justice. He’s here to protect the Norfolk County DA mob, and lifeguard Judge Beverly Cannone is enabling it. They’re literally showing the world in real time that they’re framing Karen Read. You don’t need to keep changing your case and theory when you’re prosecuting the right person. #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
3:44

The Commonwealth literally retooled and changed its entire vehicle data analysis & timeline in response to the defense’s theory. They changed their entire accident reconstruction theory AND their vehicle data theory. And this is after already changing it from the first trial. They didn’t turn this over to the defense until a week ago—well into trial already, and over 3 months after they signed their certificate of compliance, affirming that they’d turned over and produced all discovery in accordance with Rule 14. They’re supposed to be pursuing justice, or pursuing the truth. The truth doesn’t change. This is such a brazen, shameless and disgusting display of how corrupt and evil these people are. They’re so shameless that they don’t even care if the whole world is seeing them trying to prosecute an innocent woman using fake evidence. Hank Brennan’s not here for justice. He’s here to protect the Norfolk County DA mob, and lifeguard Judge Beverly Cannone is enabling it. They’re literally showing the world in real time that they’re framing Karen Read. You don’t need to keep changing your case and theory when you’re prosecuting the right person. #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

74,923 次观看 • 1 年前

Dr. Marie Russell makes a fantastic point about how on John O’Keefe’s right arm sweatshirt sleeve, the fibers at the puncture holes are coming outward, signifying that the entry object that caused the holes in the sleeve & the corresponding wounds on John’s arm, also exited or pulled out of the sleeve. This observation is highly characteristic of wounds caused by dog bites through a sleeve. However, this would not occur as the result of taillight, or any object for that matter, shattering onto John O’Keefe’s arm—as in that case, the shattered taillight pieces wouldn’t pull out or “exit” from the fabric like dog teeth would. This was the Commonwealth’s theory for the causation of injury, or the wounds on John O’Keefe’s right arm. Thoroughly debunked by Dr. Marie Russell. See evidence exhibits attached displaying the punctate holes with their fibers pulling outward from John O’Keefe’s sweatshirt sleeves. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup
0:47

Dr. Marie Russell makes a fantastic point about how on John O’Keefe’s right arm sweatshirt sleeve, the fibers at the puncture holes are coming outward, signifying that the entry object that caused the holes in the sleeve & the corresponding wounds on John’s arm, also exited or pulled out of the sleeve. This observation is highly characteristic of wounds caused by dog bites through a sleeve. However, this would not occur as the result of taillight, or any object for that matter, shattering onto John O’Keefe’s arm—as in that case, the shattered taillight pieces wouldn’t pull out or “exit” from the fabric like dog teeth would. This was the Commonwealth’s theory for the causation of injury, or the wounds on John O’Keefe’s right arm. Thoroughly debunked by Dr. Marie Russell. See evidence exhibits attached displaying the punctate holes with their fibers pulling outward from John O’Keefe’s sweatshirt sleeves. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup

Olivia

39,210 次观看 • 1 年前

Robert Alessi is going to absolutely dismantle Jud Welcher tomorrow. Jud actually thought that suggesting the laceration on John’s eyelid was caused by the spoiler, or “wing”, on the back of Karen Read’s SUV, was a good idea. He also seems to be suggesting that the half centimeter abrasion on John’s right lateral knee corresponded to the scuff marks on the rear bumper. In order for either, or both, of these things to be true, this would require John O’Keefe to have been hit—not sideswiped or “clipped”—by the back of Karen’s vehicle. He would’ve had fractures and bruising up and down his body. There were none below the head. He would’ve had bumper marks on his legs. There were none. He also would’ve likely been mowed down and completely run over by her vehicle. He was not. #KarenRead #JudWelcher #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
1:33

Robert Alessi is going to absolutely dismantle Jud Welcher tomorrow. Jud actually thought that suggesting the laceration on John’s eyelid was caused by the spoiler, or “wing”, on the back of Karen Read’s SUV, was a good idea. He also seems to be suggesting that the half centimeter abrasion on John’s right lateral knee corresponded to the scuff marks on the rear bumper. In order for either, or both, of these things to be true, this would require John O’Keefe to have been hit—not sideswiped or “clipped”—by the back of Karen’s vehicle. He would’ve had fractures and bruising up and down his body. There were none below the head. He would’ve had bumper marks on his legs. There were none. He also would’ve likely been mowed down and completely run over by her vehicle. He was not. #KarenRead #JudWelcher #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

44,537 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨🚨 Juror in #RobertRoberson’s trial just testified that she now believes he is INNOCENT, that the entire case against him was 'shaken baby syndrome' - not beating - and that the jury did not have all the evidence. I keep being told to believe the jury. So I went and found an actual juror from 2003. She couldn’t wait to testify. Here’s what she had to say: Fact: this was ONLY a shaken baby case. Fact: the prosecution never gave evidence that Nikki was beaten. Fact: the jury knew nothing about the severity of Nikki’s illness and her extensive history of illness. Fact: the jury did NOT hear everything they needed to in order to make a correct decision in this case. Fact: this juror, having learned the new scientific evidence, now believes Robert is INNOCENT and would NOT have voted to convict. I believe this juror, who knows more about the trial than those opining on Twitter. Justice demands a new trial. Watch 👇 #txlege
36:28

🚨🚨 Juror in #RobertRoberson’s trial just testified that she now believes he is INNOCENT, that the entire case against him was 'shaken baby syndrome' - not beating - and that the jury did not have all the evidence. I keep being told to believe the jury. So I went and found an actual juror from 2003. She couldn’t wait to testify. Here’s what she had to say: Fact: this was ONLY a shaken baby case. Fact: the prosecution never gave evidence that Nikki was beaten. Fact: the jury knew nothing about the severity of Nikki’s illness and her extensive history of illness. Fact: the jury did NOT hear everything they needed to in order to make a correct decision in this case. Fact: this juror, having learned the new scientific evidence, now believes Robert is INNOCENT and would NOT have voted to convict. I believe this juror, who knows more about the trial than those opining on Twitter. Justice demands a new trial. Watch 👇 #txlege

Brian Harrison

27,671 次观看 • 1 年前

"Come on.. you can't be that dumb", Kerry Roberts proclaims as she attempts to explain how silly it sounds for the cocktail glass to have been found by John O'Keefe. You're right Kerry, it's ridiculous. It's ridiculous to think the same hand that supposedly received a direct hit with an SUV (that had received no injuries from this very hit) somehow managed to grasp this cocktail glass as it broke. This same body then did a spin, with the broken glass in hand, got launched 10 feet, and said glass landed right next to the body. Or does it make more sense that a body holding a cocktail glass received a strike on the back of the head and the glass broke as the hand released the grip on the glass as the body fell. This wouldn't be the first murder where evidence was placed to look staged. Riddle me this Kerry... Is this why, til this very day, the entirety of the glass has never been found? Is this why the glass on the bumper did not match? Or the majority of the glass at the scene did not match? Where's the rest of the glass, Kerry?
0:22

"Come on.. you can't be that dumb", Kerry Roberts proclaims as she attempts to explain how silly it sounds for the cocktail glass to have been found by John O'Keefe. You're right Kerry, it's ridiculous. It's ridiculous to think the same hand that supposedly received a direct hit with an SUV (that had received no injuries from this very hit) somehow managed to grasp this cocktail glass as it broke. This same body then did a spin, with the broken glass in hand, got launched 10 feet, and said glass landed right next to the body. Or does it make more sense that a body holding a cocktail glass received a strike on the back of the head and the glass broke as the hand released the grip on the glass as the body fell. This wouldn't be the first murder where evidence was placed to look staged. Riddle me this Kerry... Is this why, til this very day, the entirety of the glass has never been found? Is this why the glass on the bumper did not match? Or the majority of the glass at the scene did not match? Where's the rest of the glass, Kerry?

BoozeyBeauty

39,510 次观看 • 8 个月前

In the process of defending Colin Albert, Judge Cannone exonerated #KarenRead, and her own ruling proves Karen couldn’t have killed John O’Keefe. She claims Colin’s “screenshot” alibi removes his opportunity to have killed John. Well that means Karen connecting to the WiFi at 1 Meadows Ave at 12:36am also proves she couldn’t have killed John either, warranting dismissal of the charges. Specifically, Judge Beverly Cannone validated Colin Albert’s alibi, stating: “There is no evidence that [he] was at 34 Fairview when the defendant and Mr. O’Keefe arrived at the home.” “Evidence at the first trial was that Colin Albert had already been picked up by the time O’Keefe and the defendant arrived at 34 Fairview.” She’s apparently playing “fact finder” (the jury’s role) now to deny more constitutional rights of Karen Read’s, and preclude her from raising a third party culprit defense involving Colin Albert based on nothing more than some flimsy, unverifiable, metadata-stripped screenshots of alleged “text messages” as an alibi, provided 2 years after the fact by un-credible witnesses. Well, guess what Beverly? I’d say you just provided excellent grounds for a subsequent Motion to Dismiss, per the Commonwealth’s evidence proving the defendant’s alibi—that Karen Read was back home and connected to the WiFi at 1 Meadows Ave by 12:36am. Not only is this far more credible and reliable alibi evidence (data don’t lie) than a purported screenshot, but the Commonwealth’s own timeline and the evidentiary timeline make it physically impossible for Karen Read to have killed John O’Keefe—she was nowhere near John nor 34 Fairview during the time that he was killed, and thus categorically had no opportunity to do so. In Karen’s case, not only is the evidence of opportunity wholly inadequate, but digital forensic data evidence from both the WiFi system at 1 Meadows Ave and Karen Read’s cellphone unequivocally prove she did not and could not have killed John O’Keefe. Dismiss the case and lock this disgraceful, tyrannical Judge up! #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead
0:25

In the process of defending Colin Albert, Judge Cannone exonerated #KarenRead, and her own ruling proves Karen couldn’t have killed John O’Keefe. She claims Colin’s “screenshot” alibi removes his opportunity to have killed John. Well that means Karen connecting to the WiFi at 1 Meadows Ave at 12:36am also proves she couldn’t have killed John either, warranting dismissal of the charges. Specifically, Judge Beverly Cannone validated Colin Albert’s alibi, stating: “There is no evidence that [he] was at 34 Fairview when the defendant and Mr. O’Keefe arrived at the home.” “Evidence at the first trial was that Colin Albert had already been picked up by the time O’Keefe and the defendant arrived at 34 Fairview.” She’s apparently playing “fact finder” (the jury’s role) now to deny more constitutional rights of Karen Read’s, and preclude her from raising a third party culprit defense involving Colin Albert based on nothing more than some flimsy, unverifiable, metadata-stripped screenshots of alleged “text messages” as an alibi, provided 2 years after the fact by un-credible witnesses. Well, guess what Beverly? I’d say you just provided excellent grounds for a subsequent Motion to Dismiss, per the Commonwealth’s evidence proving the defendant’s alibi—that Karen Read was back home and connected to the WiFi at 1 Meadows Ave by 12:36am. Not only is this far more credible and reliable alibi evidence (data don’t lie) than a purported screenshot, but the Commonwealth’s own timeline and the evidentiary timeline make it physically impossible for Karen Read to have killed John O’Keefe—she was nowhere near John nor 34 Fairview during the time that he was killed, and thus categorically had no opportunity to do so. In Karen’s case, not only is the evidence of opportunity wholly inadequate, but digital forensic data evidence from both the WiFi system at 1 Meadows Ave and Karen Read’s cellphone unequivocally prove she did not and could not have killed John O’Keefe. Dismiss the case and lock this disgraceful, tyrannical Judge up! #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

101,136 次观看 • 1 年前