Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The Commonwealth literally retooled and changed its entire vehicle data analysis & timeline in response to the defense’s theory. They changed their entire accident reconstruction theory AND their vehicle data theory. And this is after already changing it from the first trial. They didn’t turn this over to the...

OliviaLambo_'s profile picture

Olivia

27,995 subscribers

74,923 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & WellnessComedyNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Ted
Tedvor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw @jburkhartlaw Yeah Bev, here are the other options we have - if you don’t want to exclude this bullshit: • A Motion to Dismiss • A Motion for Mistrial And we’re gonna have some fun giving those motions. So that’s it. Those are your options you shady fucking bitch.

Profilbild von tammy
tammyvor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw @jburkhartlaw If she allows it! @BostonDefender @bobalessi need to move to dismiss this case!

Profilbild von SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple
SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simplevor 1 Jahr

Quantum computers can break today’s encryption in seconds.🔑 Quantum tech will reshape our digital lives. Governments & hackers are preparing for the quantum era. How about you?🛡️ Don’t get left behind!🧠 Cybersecurity Dictionary for Everyone can help:

Profilbild von Barney Pelty
Barney Peltyvor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw @jburkhartlaw Can’t UNRING the BELL with respect to building cross examinations of witnesses that have already testified.

Profilbild von ProudDad
ProudDadvor 1 Jahr

@TheNFLanalyst @aburkhartlaw @jburkhartlaw In any other state this trial would be long since OVER, dismissal, end of story. Only in the most corrupt Comminwealth in history could this charade continue.

Profilbild von obok
obokvor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw @jburkhartlaw Hi can I get a flamethrower for old times sake pls

Profilbild von BKay
BKayvor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw @jburkhartlaw Absolutely enraging. If this stands, it's an immediate mistrial.

Profilbild von caleidoscope eye 🪬
caleidoscope eye 🪬vor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw @jburkhartlaw Honestly, the case in New Mexico was thrown out for way less. This judge sucks

Profilbild von JJJ
JJJvor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw @jburkhartlaw @PamBondi, @PamBondi_X, please, look into Karen Read case! Please investigate investigators and the whole MA DA office!! The medical examiner testified that injuries were inconsistent with car collision and they are still pursuing this theory!

Profilbild von SiennaLorenzo
SiennaLorenzovor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw @jburkhartlaw Predicted this as soon as I saw how fkd the CW were with their timeline.That’s precisely why they kept things vague. And the judge as per usual, wasn’t outraged by the continuously evolving CW theory - knowing full well the defence doesn’t want a mistrial. Absolutely disgusting!

Profilbild von SallyCinnamon
SallyCinnamonvor 1 Jahr

@_nikkiconway_ @aburkhartlaw @jburkhartlaw Prosecutorial & Judicial TomFoolery. What are they doing? Are there no honest Chief Court Justices out there or ppl in charge who see this and have the ballz to put a stop to it all? I DARE them to!

Ähnliche Videos

Remember the grave concerns that Judge Beverly Cannone had when the Commonwealth falsely and prejudicially represented that “embedded within the bumper to [Karen Read’s] vehicle is pieces of cocktail glass” during pretrial litigation? Me neither. This greatly prejudiced #KarenRead to the public and potential jury pool before she’d ever gone to trial. The term “embedded” would be republished, reprinted, and reiterated all over local news reporting on the case. In fact, one of the most highly viewed stories written about the case, by Gretchen Voss of Boston Magazine, also repeated this prejudicial lie (see below). Additionally, from a pretrial hearing in May 2023, ADA Adam Lally indicated that the Commonwealth’s theory was that Officer John O’Keefe’s right arm wounds/injuries were caused by a broken cocktail glass. How many times has their theory changed? I’ve lost count. I guess it’s easy to have an ever changing theory when your evidence is rooted in creative liberties, and not actual fact. #KarenReadRetrial #MaureenHartnett #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:41

Remember the grave concerns that Judge Beverly Cannone had when the Commonwealth falsely and prejudicially represented that “embedded within the bumper to [Karen Read’s] vehicle is pieces of cocktail glass” during pretrial litigation? Me neither. This greatly prejudiced #KarenRead to the public and potential jury pool before she’d ever gone to trial. The term “embedded” would be republished, reprinted, and reiterated all over local news reporting on the case. In fact, one of the most highly viewed stories written about the case, by Gretchen Voss of Boston Magazine, also repeated this prejudicial lie (see below). Additionally, from a pretrial hearing in May 2023, ADA Adam Lally indicated that the Commonwealth’s theory was that Officer John O’Keefe’s right arm wounds/injuries were caused by a broken cocktail glass. How many times has their theory changed? I’ve lost count. I guess it’s easy to have an ever changing theory when your evidence is rooted in creative liberties, and not actual fact. #KarenReadRetrial #MaureenHartnett #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

48,334 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Why is this Judge YET AGAIN improperly and inappropriately interjecting herself to protect witnesses like Jen McCabe—witnesses who lied to the FBI, no less!? Here she literally answers for the witness! This is so inappropriate and disgusting to see how eager she is to protect obviously deceitful witnesses and keep the truth from the jury. Judge Beverly Cannone is so completely out of line. She apparently doesn’t care about judicial erring all over the place! #KarenRead #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:36

Why is this Judge YET AGAIN improperly and inappropriately interjecting herself to protect witnesses like Jen McCabe—witnesses who lied to the FBI, no less!? Here she literally answers for the witness! This is so inappropriate and disgusting to see how eager she is to protect obviously deceitful witnesses and keep the truth from the jury. Judge Beverly Cannone is so completely out of line. She apparently doesn’t care about judicial erring all over the place! #KarenRead #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

88,661 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Most Dishonest Take on the Karen Read Trial This is the most insufferable and dishonest take on the Karen Read trial I've heard thus far. The Nerve with Maureen Callahan characterizes Karen on her looks and clothing, makes unfounded allegations and proves her limited understanding of the case over and over again. This take should be infuriating to the countless supporters around the world who invested their time into this case and their pursuit of the truth and justice. Even with the verdict, people like this were never going to believe Karen, but instead of providing the evidence that lead them to their conclusion, they resort to ad hominem attacks and disparaging her character. Luckily, 12 brave truth seekers and people around the world thought differently. #freekarenread #karenread #karenfread #karenreadtrial TB Daily News Aidan Kearney
7:46

The Most Dishonest Take on the Karen Read Trial This is the most insufferable and dishonest take on the Karen Read trial I've heard thus far. The Nerve with Maureen Callahan characterizes Karen on her looks and clothing, makes unfounded allegations and proves her limited understanding of the case over and over again. This take should be infuriating to the countless supporters around the world who invested their time into this case and their pursuit of the truth and justice. Even with the verdict, people like this were never going to believe Karen, but instead of providing the evidence that lead them to their conclusion, they resort to ad hominem attacks and disparaging her character. Luckily, 12 brave truth seekers and people around the world thought differently. #freekarenread #karenread #karenfread #karenreadtrial TB Daily News Aidan Kearney

Bobby Sauce

39,610 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The defense introduced a flow chart yesterday at trial that vastly simplified & clarified the otherwise impossible to follow evidence for the jury. It made clear exactly what evidence was planted as it related to the mismatched sources of broken glass. The Commonwealth kept this from the jury at the first trial, however, because their entire approach has been to baffle with BS, and muddy the waters on things no prosecutor ever questions, like Cellebrite, for instance. Here, the defense put together a visual aid for jurors to understand the origins and discovery of multiple pieces of evidence found at the scene and on Karen Read’s bumper. The Commonwealth, however, would rather refer to these pieces of evidence by different numbers because this of course makes it harder for anyone to realize that one category of evidence doesn’t fit, signifying it was therefore planted. By referring to them as nondescript numbers, the Commonwealth was able to obfuscate the truth from the jury. I remember at the first trial seeing this flow chart—now a demonstrative successfully admitted into evidence this time around—in Attorney Alan Jackson’s binder as he conducted his cross examination of lab tech Christina Hanley, and thinking how helpful it would’ve been for the jurors to clearly understand that evidence (picture attached below). As you may recall, the Commonwealth objected to the admission of the flowchart into evidence at the first trial because they want to keep the truth from the jury. And they were successful. In a one-on-one interview after the first trial with journalist Ted Daniel, Karen Read explains the frustration surrounding this evidence and trying to get this exhibit admitted to better assist the jury in their understanding of it. Finally, this time around, the defense was successful in getting more truth through to the jury. #KarenRead #HankBrennan #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
1:37

The defense introduced a flow chart yesterday at trial that vastly simplified & clarified the otherwise impossible to follow evidence for the jury. It made clear exactly what evidence was planted as it related to the mismatched sources of broken glass. The Commonwealth kept this from the jury at the first trial, however, because their entire approach has been to baffle with BS, and muddy the waters on things no prosecutor ever questions, like Cellebrite, for instance. Here, the defense put together a visual aid for jurors to understand the origins and discovery of multiple pieces of evidence found at the scene and on Karen Read’s bumper. The Commonwealth, however, would rather refer to these pieces of evidence by different numbers because this of course makes it harder for anyone to realize that one category of evidence doesn’t fit, signifying it was therefore planted. By referring to them as nondescript numbers, the Commonwealth was able to obfuscate the truth from the jury. I remember at the first trial seeing this flow chart—now a demonstrative successfully admitted into evidence this time around—in Attorney Alan Jackson’s binder as he conducted his cross examination of lab tech Christina Hanley, and thinking how helpful it would’ve been for the jurors to clearly understand that evidence (picture attached below). As you may recall, the Commonwealth objected to the admission of the flowchart into evidence at the first trial because they want to keep the truth from the jury. And they were successful. In a one-on-one interview after the first trial with journalist Ted Daniel, Karen Read explains the frustration surrounding this evidence and trying to get this exhibit admitted to better assist the jury in their understanding of it. Finally, this time around, the defense was successful in getting more truth through to the jury. #KarenRead #HankBrennan #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

45,341 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

You may hear Democrats defending these foreign nationals… calling them “victims” or “new Americans”… But let me give you the truth: They’re not here to assimilate. They’re here to dominate. And you, Mr. and Mrs. American, are the obstacle standing in their way. They don’t care about your Constitution—they’re teaching their children how to circumvent it, challenge it, and ultimately replace it with their own laws, their own language, their own authority. This isn’t immigration. It’s infiltration. And the left is cheering it on because they hate this country as much as its enemies do. Make no mistake: they’re not here to become Americans. They’re here to rule over Americans. #InvasionNotImmigration #NoAssimilationNoCitizenship #14thAmendmentFraud #AmericaUnderSiege #DearbornCaliphate #StopTheReplacement
2:05

You may hear Democrats defending these foreign nationals… calling them “victims” or “new Americans”… But let me give you the truth: They’re not here to assimilate. They’re here to dominate. And you, Mr. and Mrs. American, are the obstacle standing in their way. They don’t care about your Constitution—they’re teaching their children how to circumvent it, challenge it, and ultimately replace it with their own laws, their own language, their own authority. This isn’t immigration. It’s infiltration. And the left is cheering it on because they hate this country as much as its enemies do. Make no mistake: they’re not here to become Americans. They’re here to rule over Americans. #InvasionNotImmigration #NoAssimilationNoCitizenship #14thAmendmentFraud #AmericaUnderSiege #DearbornCaliphate #StopTheReplacement

A Gene Robinson

32,937 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING: #KarenRead defense reveals that just 5 days ago, they were provided a new report from Yuri Bukhenik dated 2/28/25 where he reveals that in May of 2024 (during trial), he was provided with a thumb drive & a CD containing video of the CPD exterior Sallyport—never turned over to the defense, despite Bukhenik’s report stating that not only was he aware of & had seen it, but he was also told to review it prior to his testimony. The Commonwealth intentionally withheld this Brady evidence from the defense at the first trial, and still didn’t even produce it until several months after the fact. So you’re telling me that the Commonwealth is so easily able to produce this Sallyport video on thumb drives and CD to its own investigators to review at trial, but they still can’t provide an answer to this day of where exactly it all came from? And Yuri Bukhenik knew of this information presumably alongside ADAs Laura McLaughlin and Adam Lally, but still chose neither to turn it over despite the law requiring them to, nor did they choose to reveal its existence at trial? Why would they hide and withhold that evidence? If Karen Read were truly guilty, wouldn’t it just help their case? #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead
3:29

BREAKING: #KarenRead defense reveals that just 5 days ago, they were provided a new report from Yuri Bukhenik dated 2/28/25 where he reveals that in May of 2024 (during trial), he was provided with a thumb drive & a CD containing video of the CPD exterior Sallyport—never turned over to the defense, despite Bukhenik’s report stating that not only was he aware of & had seen it, but he was also told to review it prior to his testimony. The Commonwealth intentionally withheld this Brady evidence from the defense at the first trial, and still didn’t even produce it until several months after the fact. So you’re telling me that the Commonwealth is so easily able to produce this Sallyport video on thumb drives and CD to its own investigators to review at trial, but they still can’t provide an answer to this day of where exactly it all came from? And Yuri Bukhenik knew of this information presumably alongside ADAs Laura McLaughlin and Adam Lally, but still chose neither to turn it over despite the law requiring them to, nor did they choose to reveal its existence at trial? Why would they hide and withhold that evidence? If Karen Read were truly guilty, wouldn’t it just help their case? #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

117,233 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Mark Rubio was asked in India yesterday. Why are Americans racist? People from India are mad and they wanna blame somebody else and they’re willing to throw the word racist around! The truth of the matter is they did this to themselves! Countries are all over the world are saying we don’t want your tourist dollars don’t come here! It’s their culture. They’re dirtiness their rudeness they’re looking down upon those that are not habibi’s!
1:07

Mark Rubio was asked in India yesterday. Why are Americans racist? People from India are mad and they wanna blame somebody else and they’re willing to throw the word racist around! The truth of the matter is they did this to themselves! Countries are all over the world are saying we don’t want your tourist dollars don’t come here! It’s their culture. They’re dirtiness their rudeness they’re looking down upon those that are not habibi’s!

Anttsinc

88,376 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I couldn’t be more in agreement with all of this🔥 “Children don’t come into this world confused. They come in wanting candy and toys. They want to play. They want to have fun… they don’t come in wondering about their privates or about their inclinations or s*xuaI instincts. No, it’s unstable, perverted adults that are indoctrinating young children, that are confusing the least of these by planting suggestions in their mind, showing them pictures and asking them to experiment… I think it is mental child abuse. I think it is psychological brainwashing. I think it ought to be a crime. I think parents ought to rise up… And the government is silent about it and crooked about it. And they’re teaching our children things we don’t want them to know. And they’re exposing them too early and they’re convincing them of something that isn’t even the truth. To me, that is a crime against humanity. And if you are a school teacher who is doing this, you, in my opinion, are a criminal. And if you are a school principal who’s promoting this, you are a criminal. And if you’re the school board who’s pushing this, you’re all criminals. You’re aiding and abetting perversion and you’re ruining children and our society.” Children are born innocent — adults are the ones confusing them!
2:19

I couldn’t be more in agreement with all of this🔥 “Children don’t come into this world confused. They come in wanting candy and toys. They want to play. They want to have fun… they don’t come in wondering about their privates or about their inclinations or s*xuaI instincts. No, it’s unstable, perverted adults that are indoctrinating young children, that are confusing the least of these by planting suggestions in their mind, showing them pictures and asking them to experiment… I think it is mental child abuse. I think it is psychological brainwashing. I think it ought to be a crime. I think parents ought to rise up… And the government is silent about it and crooked about it. And they’re teaching our children things we don’t want them to know. And they’re exposing them too early and they’re convincing them of something that isn’t even the truth. To me, that is a crime against humanity. And if you are a school teacher who is doing this, you, in my opinion, are a criminal. And if you are a school principal who’s promoting this, you are a criminal. And if you’re the school board who’s pushing this, you’re all criminals. You’re aiding and abetting perversion and you’re ruining children and our society.” Children are born innocent — adults are the ones confusing them!

TONY™

323,884 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

ARCCA VOIR DIRE #KarenRead The Commonwealth has never produced ANY of its communications with its experts in discovery. They also staunchly opposed/fought turning over phone records of witnesses in this murder case. The defense, however, has turned over every single one of its communications with its experts from ARCCA, including those outside the scope of typical Rule 14 reciprocal discovery provisions. Because apparently these are far more important than actual evidence of third party culprits in a murder case—screenshots will do for those, if they exist! Ironically, it was upon the defense’s timely production of its reciprocal discovery in compliance with Rule 14 that Judge Beverly Cannone has punished them for apparently being so forthcoming and transparent. And this is for experts that the Commonwealth has had equal access to, as they were made available to both sides by the Feds. For reference: Judge Beverly Cannone denied the defense’s Rule 17 Motion seeking Jen McCabe’s phone records, but was swiftly overturned by the Supreme Judicial Court in 2023. Curiously, the Commonwealth steadfastly opposed & fought against the defense’s access to those evidentiary and relevant phone records for their supposedly innocent & forthcoming witness. What are they hiding? At the same time, Jen McCabe promptly hired high-profile murder defense attorney Kevin Reddington to help in the fight to obstruct justice for her “close friend”, John O’Keefe, by helping her fight the request for her phone records. ————— Who’s really the one hiding things? Why hasn’t the Commonwealth turned over any of its communications with its experts? How is this fair? ————— Attached: See the Court’s latest order for even more discovery from the defense and ARCCA. To be discussed today. #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:44

ARCCA VOIR DIRE #KarenRead The Commonwealth has never produced ANY of its communications with its experts in discovery. They also staunchly opposed/fought turning over phone records of witnesses in this murder case. The defense, however, has turned over every single one of its communications with its experts from ARCCA, including those outside the scope of typical Rule 14 reciprocal discovery provisions. Because apparently these are far more important than actual evidence of third party culprits in a murder case—screenshots will do for those, if they exist! Ironically, it was upon the defense’s timely production of its reciprocal discovery in compliance with Rule 14 that Judge Beverly Cannone has punished them for apparently being so forthcoming and transparent. And this is for experts that the Commonwealth has had equal access to, as they were made available to both sides by the Feds. For reference: Judge Beverly Cannone denied the defense’s Rule 17 Motion seeking Jen McCabe’s phone records, but was swiftly overturned by the Supreme Judicial Court in 2023. Curiously, the Commonwealth steadfastly opposed & fought against the defense’s access to those evidentiary and relevant phone records for their supposedly innocent & forthcoming witness. What are they hiding? At the same time, Jen McCabe promptly hired high-profile murder defense attorney Kevin Reddington to help in the fight to obstruct justice for her “close friend”, John O’Keefe, by helping her fight the request for her phone records. ————— Who’s really the one hiding things? Why hasn’t the Commonwealth turned over any of its communications with its experts? How is this fair? ————— Attached: See the Court’s latest order for even more discovery from the defense and ARCCA. To be discussed today. #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

42,976 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Let’s just get this straight. Anti-Zionism is antisemitism. Antisemitism is not just racism or hatred. It’s a shape-shifting conspiracy theory. And every few generations it changes into something different. Now people are literally saying, oh, we’ll just get rid of Israel and everything will be fine. It shifts into something different, in which takes everything bad that was said about the Jews, everything that you attributed to the Jews as the worst thing in history, instead of on the Jews, onto Israel. And they attribute the same bloodthirstiness, the same untrustworthiness, the same desire to control and power. Literally take the word Jew and swap it with IDF. They’re standing on the footsteps of colleges in America and they are rehashing. They think they have this new, they found this new cause and unbeknown to them, first of all, they’re rehashing antisemitic tropes from like the 1500s, right? And that obsession that they aren’t even aware of is what allowed for October 7th and October 8th to happen. And that is something that we need to be very careful about, because they’re after taking Israel down. And that would be if they will succeed, and they won’t. But they’re after that. And that is the possible new Holocaust. That would be the calamity of the Jewish people of our generation. And it’s masked as this like, I’m not antisemitic, I’m just an anti-Zionist. No. Antisemitism in a new face. We have to be very careful of it.
2:05

Let’s just get this straight. Anti-Zionism is antisemitism. Antisemitism is not just racism or hatred. It’s a shape-shifting conspiracy theory. And every few generations it changes into something different. Now people are literally saying, oh, we’ll just get rid of Israel and everything will be fine. It shifts into something different, in which takes everything bad that was said about the Jews, everything that you attributed to the Jews as the worst thing in history, instead of on the Jews, onto Israel. And they attribute the same bloodthirstiness, the same untrustworthiness, the same desire to control and power. Literally take the word Jew and swap it with IDF. They’re standing on the footsteps of colleges in America and they are rehashing. They think they have this new, they found this new cause and unbeknown to them, first of all, they’re rehashing antisemitic tropes from like the 1500s, right? And that obsession that they aren’t even aware of is what allowed for October 7th and October 8th to happen. And that is something that we need to be very careful about, because they’re after taking Israel down. And that would be if they will succeed, and they won’t. But they’re after that. And that is the possible new Holocaust. That would be the calamity of the Jewish people of our generation. And it’s masked as this like, I’m not antisemitic, I’m just an anti-Zionist. No. Antisemitism in a new face. We have to be very careful of it.

Noa Tishby

309,471 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Marc Andreessen explains how to identify fake founders “There are definitely people that come in [to pitch us] and present themselves to be something they’re not. They’ve read all the books. They will have listened to this interview. They study everything and they construct a facade…. And the amount of this is exactly correlated with the NASDAQ.” As Marc explains, when stock prices are high and tech is hot, there are a lot people who decide being a tech founder is a fast track to high status: “They’re fundamentally oriented for social status — they’re trying to get the social status without the substance. And there are always other places to go to get social status. So after 2000, the joke was B2B meant back to banking and B2C meant back to consulting — which is, the people who showed up to be in tech were like, yeah, screw it. This is over. I’m going to go back to Goldman Sachs or McKinsey where I can be high status. So you get this flushing kind of effect that happens in a downturn. But in a big upswing, you get a lot of people showing up with, let’s say, public persona without the substance to back it up.” How does Marc identify these people? He uses the same technique that homicide detectives use to find out if you’re innocent — keep asking increasingly detailed questions: “You ask increasingly detailed questions and people have trouble making things up and things just fuzz into obvious BS, and fake founders basically have the same problem. They’re able to relay a conceptual theory of what they’re doing… But as they get into the details, it just fuzzes out. Whereas the true people that you want to back can do it. What you find is they’ve spent 5 or 10 or 20 years obsessing over the details of whatever it is they’re about to do. And they’re so deep in the details and they know so much more about it than you ever will.” Source: Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D. (Sep 2023)
2:08

Marc Andreessen explains how to identify fake founders “There are definitely people that come in [to pitch us] and present themselves to be something they’re not. They’ve read all the books. They will have listened to this interview. They study everything and they construct a facade…. And the amount of this is exactly correlated with the NASDAQ.” As Marc explains, when stock prices are high and tech is hot, there are a lot people who decide being a tech founder is a fast track to high status: “They’re fundamentally oriented for social status — they’re trying to get the social status without the substance. And there are always other places to go to get social status. So after 2000, the joke was B2B meant back to banking and B2C meant back to consulting — which is, the people who showed up to be in tech were like, yeah, screw it. This is over. I’m going to go back to Goldman Sachs or McKinsey where I can be high status. So you get this flushing kind of effect that happens in a downturn. But in a big upswing, you get a lot of people showing up with, let’s say, public persona without the substance to back it up.” How does Marc identify these people? He uses the same technique that homicide detectives use to find out if you’re innocent — keep asking increasingly detailed questions: “You ask increasingly detailed questions and people have trouble making things up and things just fuzz into obvious BS, and fake founders basically have the same problem. They’re able to relay a conceptual theory of what they’re doing… But as they get into the details, it just fuzzes out. Whereas the true people that you want to back can do it. What you find is they’ve spent 5 or 10 or 20 years obsessing over the details of whatever it is they’re about to do. And they’re so deep in the details and they know so much more about it than you ever will.” Source: Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D. (Sep 2023)

Startup Archive

168,650 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

Hank Brennan in opening statements: “A cellphone is an amazing piece of technology. It’s like a computer. It carries extraordinary data. And when they found [John O’Keefe’s] cellphone…they studied the cellphone.” But also: - Jen McCabe’s 2:27am incriminating Google search isn’t reliable - Jen McCabe’s phone scrubbing deletions of incriminating phone calls and text messages around the time of the murder aren’t reliable - The Apple Health data aren’t reliable but we’re still going to cherry pick from it Oh, and Hank Brennan claims that “they studied the cellphone” to then discuss how the location data on his cellphone is the most important. Fact check: the Commonwealth never looked at John O’Keefe’s cellphone’s location GPS data—not until AFTER the defense hired an expert themselves who looked at it and all the phone data to reveal John O’Keefe made it into that house. The Commonwealth NEVER looked at John O’Keefe’s phone location data until May 8, 2023, over 15 months after his cellphone was found underneath him on January 29, 2022 (see their report attached). They never cared about his phone location data or the truth. If they did, they would’ve looked at his phone location data on January 29, 2022. They did not. It’s only ever been reactionary to the defense who’ve been pursuing the truth and justice. This is the gaslighting, hypocrisy, deceit and dishonesty of the Commonwealth’s case. Buckle up because you’re about to get Whitey Bulger’s defense attorney, Hank Brennan’s defense of the McAlberts and DA Michael Morrissey’s Office. That’s the only reason why he’s here. That’s what he was paid to do. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:24

Hank Brennan in opening statements: “A cellphone is an amazing piece of technology. It’s like a computer. It carries extraordinary data. And when they found [John O’Keefe’s] cellphone…they studied the cellphone.” But also: - Jen McCabe’s 2:27am incriminating Google search isn’t reliable - Jen McCabe’s phone scrubbing deletions of incriminating phone calls and text messages around the time of the murder aren’t reliable - The Apple Health data aren’t reliable but we’re still going to cherry pick from it Oh, and Hank Brennan claims that “they studied the cellphone” to then discuss how the location data on his cellphone is the most important. Fact check: the Commonwealth never looked at John O’Keefe’s cellphone’s location GPS data—not until AFTER the defense hired an expert themselves who looked at it and all the phone data to reveal John O’Keefe made it into that house. The Commonwealth NEVER looked at John O’Keefe’s phone location data until May 8, 2023, over 15 months after his cellphone was found underneath him on January 29, 2022 (see their report attached). They never cared about his phone location data or the truth. If they did, they would’ve looked at his phone location data on January 29, 2022. They did not. It’s only ever been reactionary to the defense who’ve been pursuing the truth and justice. This is the gaslighting, hypocrisy, deceit and dishonesty of the Commonwealth’s case. Buckle up because you’re about to get Whitey Bulger’s defense attorney, Hank Brennan’s defense of the McAlberts and DA Michael Morrissey’s Office. That’s the only reason why he’s here. That’s what he was paid to do. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

34,243 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 BOOM! An American tells Nick Shirley exactly why he bought a pig in Texas to oppose the Islamic takeover of his home “I’m here because this is my home. These people just recently came here and they want to take over.” “They’ve already built a Muslim only town. Now they want to expand it into a Muslim only city and take over big parts of Texas.” “I’m not okay with that. They lie to our faces.” “There’s a reason they change the laws, change the street names, and push you out. It’s because they’re trying to take over. They’re literally commanded to take over.” Say it louder. Americans are DONE being displaced in their own country.
0:51

🚨 BOOM! An American tells Nick Shirley exactly why he bought a pig in Texas to oppose the Islamic takeover of his home “I’m here because this is my home. These people just recently came here and they want to take over.” “They’ve already built a Muslim only town. Now they want to expand it into a Muslim only city and take over big parts of Texas.” “I’m not okay with that. They lie to our faces.” “There’s a reason they change the laws, change the street names, and push you out. It’s because they’re trying to take over. They’re literally commanded to take over.” Say it louder. Americans are DONE being displaced in their own country.

Tironianae 🍊🍊 Z. - Ultra Verbum Vincet

800,423 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

🚨 BOOM! An American tells Nick Shirley exactly why he bought a pig in Texas to oppose the Islamic takeover of his home “I’m here because this is my home. These people just recently came here and they want to take over.” “They’ve already built a Muslim only town. Now they want to expand it into a Muslim only city and take over big parts of Texas.” “I’m not okay with that. They lie to our faces.” “There’s a reason they change the laws, change the street names, and push you out. It’s because they’re trying to take over. They’re literally commanded to take over.” Say it louder. Americans are DONE being displaced in their own country.
0:51

🚨 BOOM! An American tells Nick Shirley exactly why he bought a pig in Texas to oppose the Islamic takeover of his home “I’m here because this is my home. These people just recently came here and they want to take over.” “They’ve already built a Muslim only town. Now they want to expand it into a Muslim only city and take over big parts of Texas.” “I’m not okay with that. They lie to our faces.” “There’s a reason they change the laws, change the street names, and push you out. It’s because they’re trying to take over. They’re literally commanded to take over.” Say it louder. Americans are DONE being displaced in their own country.

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

97,273 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

BREAKING: Attorney Alan Jackson reveals that the Commonwealth has just recently (just days ago) turned over additional Canton PD Sallyport surveillance footage video clips—specifically, exculpatory video—previously withheld from the defense. This means they magically produced more Sallyport footage after the defense sent their expert, Mr. Erickson, to conduct a forensic video extraction from the CPD DVR system in December, only to find it had none of the footage preserved. If none of the footage was preserved, then where is the Commonwealth pulling all of this Brady video footage from that they’re still turning over piecemeal to the defense AFTER #KarenRead’s first trial? Given the CPD DVR system automatically overwrites its footage after 30 days, this means the Commonwealth has withheld exculpatory Brady evidence—and known about & had it in their possession since at least February 29, 2022. These seem to represent major Brady violations, and make Hank Brennan’s response to the defense’s recent motion seeking reimbursement for fees associated with flying their expert out under false pretenses for a fruitless visit to obtain said footage all the more damning. Hank Brennan is playing the role of prosecutor, meaning he has Rule 14 discovery and ethical obligations. Brennan’s argument, trying to blame the defense for evidence which the Commonwealth has either destroyed or hidden for years, will not fare well for him. #KarenReadTrial
4:26

BREAKING: Attorney Alan Jackson reveals that the Commonwealth has just recently (just days ago) turned over additional Canton PD Sallyport surveillance footage video clips—specifically, exculpatory video—previously withheld from the defense. This means they magically produced more Sallyport footage after the defense sent their expert, Mr. Erickson, to conduct a forensic video extraction from the CPD DVR system in December, only to find it had none of the footage preserved. If none of the footage was preserved, then where is the Commonwealth pulling all of this Brady video footage from that they’re still turning over piecemeal to the defense AFTER #KarenRead’s first trial? Given the CPD DVR system automatically overwrites its footage after 30 days, this means the Commonwealth has withheld exculpatory Brady evidence—and known about & had it in their possession since at least February 29, 2022. These seem to represent major Brady violations, and make Hank Brennan’s response to the defense’s recent motion seeking reimbursement for fees associated with flying their expert out under false pretenses for a fruitless visit to obtain said footage all the more damning. Hank Brennan is playing the role of prosecutor, meaning he has Rule 14 discovery and ethical obligations. Brennan’s argument, trying to blame the defense for evidence which the Commonwealth has either destroyed or hidden for years, will not fare well for him. #KarenReadTrial

Olivia

101,365 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#KarenReadRetrial RENTSCHLER'S CONFOUNDING ADMISSION During a contentious line of questioning yesterday with Hank Brennan, Dr. Andrew Rentschler admitted that he knew the Commonwealth's theory of the case BEFORE he testified during trial Read's initial trial. For any other defense expert witness in any other trial it would be expected for the expert to have an understanding of the prosecution's theory, but not so in this one. Due to the circumstances in which ARCCA's initial involvement began through a separate investigation by the federal government, the parameters of what ARCCA could discuss with the defense were limited. So too were the materials ARCCA received from the federal investigators which did NOT include the theory of the case: Trooper Paul's reconstruction. Prior to the retrial we learned of the murky relationship ARCCA had with the defense including that they were not "independent", they had received compensation, and they had deleted their communications. We also learned that both Daniel Wolfe and Andrew Rentschler were receiving information from federal investigators in violation of a sequestration order during the first trial. Rentschler characterized the information they received during the trial as "evidence" under oath yesterday and stated it didn't change his opinion or analysis because he already knew the theory of the case. This leads to some serious questions: 1. WHO gave Rentschler the prosecution's theory? As per the materials listed in ARCCA's initial report he did not receive it from federal investigators. 2. WHEN did Rentschler receive the theory of the case? Based on his testimony under oath yesterday it was prior to the inception of trial one. 3. WHAT theory were they given? Was it generalized as a pedestrian collision or detailed as a sideswipe event? 4. HOW especially if only a generalized theory was given did additional information and evidence not have an effect on analysis or opinion? 5. WHY if he had the theory of the case would he choose to engage in and testify about testing two hypotheses that had nothing to the theory of the case? ARCCA tested whether or not throwing a glass could break the taillight and whether the head injury came from contact with the taillight, neither of which were even suggested in the prosecution's theory of a sideswipe and fall backwards. Add to this Rentschler's ludicrous statements yesterday about the insignificance of the DNA, the debris field and the taillight fragments embedded in John's clothes, and ARCCA's involvement in this case becomes even shadier. Time for US Attorneys office to shed some light on what really happened here.
0:42

#KarenReadRetrial RENTSCHLER'S CONFOUNDING ADMISSION During a contentious line of questioning yesterday with Hank Brennan, Dr. Andrew Rentschler admitted that he knew the Commonwealth's theory of the case BEFORE he testified during trial Read's initial trial. For any other defense expert witness in any other trial it would be expected for the expert to have an understanding of the prosecution's theory, but not so in this one. Due to the circumstances in which ARCCA's initial involvement began through a separate investigation by the federal government, the parameters of what ARCCA could discuss with the defense were limited. So too were the materials ARCCA received from the federal investigators which did NOT include the theory of the case: Trooper Paul's reconstruction. Prior to the retrial we learned of the murky relationship ARCCA had with the defense including that they were not "independent", they had received compensation, and they had deleted their communications. We also learned that both Daniel Wolfe and Andrew Rentschler were receiving information from federal investigators in violation of a sequestration order during the first trial. Rentschler characterized the information they received during the trial as "evidence" under oath yesterday and stated it didn't change his opinion or analysis because he already knew the theory of the case. This leads to some serious questions: 1. WHO gave Rentschler the prosecution's theory? As per the materials listed in ARCCA's initial report he did not receive it from federal investigators. 2. WHEN did Rentschler receive the theory of the case? Based on his testimony under oath yesterday it was prior to the inception of trial one. 3. WHAT theory were they given? Was it generalized as a pedestrian collision or detailed as a sideswipe event? 4. HOW especially if only a generalized theory was given did additional information and evidence not have an effect on analysis or opinion? 5. WHY if he had the theory of the case would he choose to engage in and testify about testing two hypotheses that had nothing to the theory of the case? ARCCA tested whether or not throwing a glass could break the taillight and whether the head injury came from contact with the taillight, neither of which were even suggested in the prosecution's theory of a sideswipe and fall backwards. Add to this Rentschler's ludicrous statements yesterday about the insignificance of the DNA, the debris field and the taillight fragments embedded in John's clothes, and ARCCA's involvement in this case becomes even shadier. Time for US Attorneys office to shed some light on what really happened here.

Julie Carpenter

15,224 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 JUST IN: El Salvador President Nayib Bukele exposes that SOROS-LINKED interests surged to the US Capitol trying to defame him as a "human rights abuser," demanding Bukele RELEASE the violent terrorists he arrested It backfired HARD! 🇸🇻🇺🇸 BUKELE: "See clearly how they defend terrorists. See how they say that, even if they committed horrible crimes, they are there to defend their rights. I’m not saying it—they say it themselves with their own words in the U.S. Congress." "Don’t let them fool you: they’re not defending supposed innocents, they’re defending terrorists. They’re saying that MS-13 is not a terrorist organization and that, no matter their offenses, they will still defend their rights." "Let there be no doubt: what these supposed “journalists,” “human rights defense” organizations, and national and foreign politicians who support them are seeking is the release of these criminals, so they can return to subjecting the Salvadoran people to their reign of terror and turn us back into the most dangerous country in the world." "But they shot themselves in the foot, again." 🔥 Nayib Bukele
2:26

🚨 JUST IN: El Salvador President Nayib Bukele exposes that SOROS-LINKED interests surged to the US Capitol trying to defame him as a "human rights abuser," demanding Bukele RELEASE the violent terrorists he arrested It backfired HARD! 🇸🇻🇺🇸 BUKELE: "See clearly how they defend terrorists. See how they say that, even if they committed horrible crimes, they are there to defend their rights. I’m not saying it—they say it themselves with their own words in the U.S. Congress." "Don’t let them fool you: they’re not defending supposed innocents, they’re defending terrorists. They’re saying that MS-13 is not a terrorist organization and that, no matter their offenses, they will still defend their rights." "Let there be no doubt: what these supposed “journalists,” “human rights defense” organizations, and national and foreign politicians who support them are seeking is the release of these criminals, so they can return to subjecting the Salvadoran people to their reign of terror and turn us back into the most dangerous country in the world." "But they shot themselves in the foot, again." 🔥 Nayib Bukele

Eric Daugherty

330,130 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The biggest takeaway from the Epstein files is that it is a grotesque example of how power corrupts. The entire establishment system is rotten to the core - on all sides of the political spectrum. They think that they are above the law. A bunch of sick and twisted gilded individuals who are more concerned about their selfish and disgustingly depraved needs and who don’t give a shit about improving society, while pretending that they do. They use fake virtue as a masquerade to cover up a whole multitude of sins. And they get away with it because the entire system is tilted. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else. It’s about time that everyone stops being so subservient to these power mad, greedy, corrupt and deviant psychopaths and work together to genuinely try and change the system and drain the swamp. As George Carlin once said: “It's a big club, and you ain’t in it. You and I are not in the big club. And by the way, it's the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long beating you over the head in their media telling you what to believe, what to think and what to buy. The table is tilted folks. The game is rigged. I'll tell you what they don’t want: They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that. That doesn’t help them. That’s against their interests. They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around a kitchen table to figure out how badly they’re getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. They don’t want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers.”
2:20

The biggest takeaway from the Epstein files is that it is a grotesque example of how power corrupts. The entire establishment system is rotten to the core - on all sides of the political spectrum. They think that they are above the law. A bunch of sick and twisted gilded individuals who are more concerned about their selfish and disgustingly depraved needs and who don’t give a shit about improving society, while pretending that they do. They use fake virtue as a masquerade to cover up a whole multitude of sins. And they get away with it because the entire system is tilted. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else. It’s about time that everyone stops being so subservient to these power mad, greedy, corrupt and deviant psychopaths and work together to genuinely try and change the system and drain the swamp. As George Carlin once said: “It's a big club, and you ain’t in it. You and I are not in the big club. And by the way, it's the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long beating you over the head in their media telling you what to believe, what to think and what to buy. The table is tilted folks. The game is rigged. I'll tell you what they don’t want: They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that. That doesn’t help them. That’s against their interests. They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around a kitchen table to figure out how badly they’re getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. They don’t want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers.”

James Melville 🚜

78,461 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨Can we take a moment to analyze how absolutely evil and ridiculous it is for these two men to be sitting together and making jokes after very real accusations of War Crimes? There’s zero understanding. Zero accountability. Zero respect for the gravity of what they’ve done. These aren’t trivial allegations. These are life and death decisions that violate the Geneva Convention and dozens of laws and International Agreements. And instead of showing even a flicker of remorse, they smirk. They laugh. They pretend nothing happened. It’s the behavior of men who think they’re untouchable - men who believe laws and basic human morality simply don’t apply to them. They know the accusations are serious. They know investigators are circling. And their response is to perform arrogance, to signal to the world that they don’t fear consequences because they’ve never faced consequences. This is what impunity looks like in real time. Powerful men trying to meme their way out of responsibility for actions that could constitute a war crime. They are betting that the public will forget, that Congress will stall, that the media will move on. But the truth is staring them in the face: no amount of jokes or posturing can change the facts or erase the timeline. And sooner or later, the law catches up to everyone - even those who’ve convinced themselves they’re above it.
0:38

🚨Can we take a moment to analyze how absolutely evil and ridiculous it is for these two men to be sitting together and making jokes after very real accusations of War Crimes? There’s zero understanding. Zero accountability. Zero respect for the gravity of what they’ve done. These aren’t trivial allegations. These are life and death decisions that violate the Geneva Convention and dozens of laws and International Agreements. And instead of showing even a flicker of remorse, they smirk. They laugh. They pretend nothing happened. It’s the behavior of men who think they’re untouchable - men who believe laws and basic human morality simply don’t apply to them. They know the accusations are serious. They know investigators are circling. And their response is to perform arrogance, to signal to the world that they don’t fear consequences because they’ve never faced consequences. This is what impunity looks like in real time. Powerful men trying to meme their way out of responsibility for actions that could constitute a war crime. They are betting that the public will forget, that Congress will stall, that the media will move on. But the truth is staring them in the face: no amount of jokes or posturing can change the facts or erase the timeline. And sooner or later, the law catches up to everyone - even those who’ve convinced themselves they’re above it.

CALL TO ACTIVISM

160,321 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten