Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Remember the jelly watermelon slice? Now there’s a whole watermelon 🍉 Using Claude Opus 5.5, I made a full jelly watermelon you can cut into pieces with a knife right in your browser First, squish and stretch the whole thing, then grab the knife and slice it however you... show more

Vib3Coded

2,549 subscribers

44,181 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Making a watermelon - $4.50. Letting me slice it - another $7.98 😂🔪🍉 Asked Claude Opus 5.5 to add a knife to my jelly watermelon. Now I can cut it into pieces, and each one keeps wobbling, stretching, and bouncing right in the browser Estimated API cost: $4.50 for the watermelon + $7.98 for the knife and slicing = $12.48 Slicing cost more than the watermelon itself. But I can’t stop playing with it lol

Making a watermelon - $4.50. Letting me slice it - another $7.98 😂🔪🍉 Asked Claude Opus 5.5 to add a knife to my jelly watermelon. Now I can cut it into pieces, and each one keeps wobbling, stretching, and bouncing right in the browser Estimated API cost: $4.50 for the watermelon + $7.98 for the knife and slicing = $12.48 Slicing cost more than the watermelon itself. But I can’t stop playing with it lol

Vib3Coded

619,345 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

The orange slice - $7.58. Cutting it up and stamping out hearts - another $11.60 😂🍊 Asked Claude Opus 5.5 to add a knife and shape cutters to my jelly orange slice. Now I can cut out shapes, slice it into pieces, and stretch each one separately. Everything keeps wobbling and bouncing right in the browser Estimated API cost: $7.58 for the original + $11.60 for the knife and cutters = $19.18 The tools cost more than the orange. But hey, now I’ve got my own gummy workshop lol

The orange slice - $7.58. Cutting it up and stamping out hearts - another $11.60 😂🍊 Asked Claude Opus 5.5 to add a knife and shape cutters to my jelly orange slice. Now I can cut out shapes, slice it into pieces, and stretch each one separately. Everything keeps wobbling and bouncing right in the browser Estimated API cost: $7.58 for the original + $11.60 for the knife and cutters = $19.18 The tools cost more than the orange. But hey, now I’ve got my own gummy workshop lol

Vib3Coded

26,891 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

My jelly world now has its own island 😂🌴 Claude Opus 5.5 vs ChatGPT-6 Astra I prefer Opus’s water: the transparency, reflections, and a whole storm from moving the mouse. But Astra feels more like jelly - the edges bend and the whole island wobbles Estimated API cost: Opus - $15.54 Astra - $10.51 Would you pay extra for Opus or pick Astra? 👀

My jelly world now has its own island 😂🌴 Claude Opus 5.5 vs ChatGPT-6 Astra I prefer Opus’s water: the transparency, reflections, and a whole storm from moving the mouse. But Astra feels more like jelly - the edges bend and the whole island wobbles Estimated API cost: Opus - $15.54 Astra - $10.51 Would you pay extra for Opus or pick Astra? 👀

Vib3Coded

64,706 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Finally, Opus made me the perfect jelly - even better than Astra’s 🍉🤯 Claude Opus 5.5 vs ChatGPT-6 Astra This time, I prefer Opus: the juicy color, glossy flesh, and especially how the slice stretches, folds, and jiggles when you let go. It genuinely looks like gummy candy I want to touch Astra’s version is nice too, but Opus gets my vote here Estimated API cost: Opus - $4.50 Astra - $2.05 More than twice the price. Do you think it’s worth it? 👀

Finally, Opus made me the perfect jelly - even better than Astra’s 🍉🤯 Claude Opus 5.5 vs ChatGPT-6 Astra This time, I prefer Opus: the juicy color, glossy flesh, and especially how the slice stretches, folds, and jiggles when you let go. It genuinely looks like gummy candy I want to touch Astra’s version is nice too, but Opus gets my vote here Estimated API cost: Opus - $4.50 Astra - $2.05 More than twice the price. Do you think it’s worth it? 👀

Vib3Coded

442,234 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

Opus made dice I actually want to eat. And did it for less 🎲😂 Claude Opus 5.5 vs ChatGPT-6 Astra. Same idea - gummy dice I prefer Opus here: juicy colors, translucent material, and that soft, stretchy jelly feel. Astra’s version looks firmer, and the colors and highlights don’t grab me as much Estimated API cost: Opus - $16.50 Astra - $20.89 For me, Opus wins this round on both looks and price. Which ones would you squish? 👀

Opus made dice I actually want to eat. And did it for less 🎲😂 Claude Opus 5.5 vs ChatGPT-6 Astra. Same idea - gummy dice I prefer Opus here: juicy colors, translucent material, and that soft, stretchy jelly feel. Astra’s version looks firmer, and the colors and highlights don’t grab me as much Estimated API cost: Opus - $16.50 Astra - $20.89 For me, Opus wins this round on both looks and price. Which ones would you squish? 👀

Vib3Coded

31,596 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

My plush octopus got a little too attached to me 😂🐙 Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol I prefer Opus: fluffier fur and livelier tentacles. Both run right in the browser on WebGPU - no ready-made models or textures, just code, soft-body physics, and fur you can comb Unexpectedly, Opus was cheaper too. Sol usually costs several times less in my tests Estimated API cost: Opus - $15.21 Sol - $18.03 Fluffier and cheaper? Which one would you pick? 👀

My plush octopus got a little too attached to me 😂🐙 Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol I prefer Opus: fluffier fur and livelier tentacles. Both run right in the browser on WebGPU - no ready-made models or textures, just code, soft-body physics, and fur you can comb Unexpectedly, Opus was cheaper too. Sol usually costs several times less in my tests Estimated API cost: Opus - $15.21 Sol - $18.03 Fluffier and cheaper? Which one would you pick? 👀

Vib3Coded

137,220 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

The jelly world has reached the Arctic 🧊 Claude Opus 5.5 vs ChatGPT-6 Astra I prefer Opus’s colors and models: the rich blue water, the island, and the little details look nicer to me. Astra’s storm impressed me more - moving the mouse really gets the water raging Estimated API cost: Opus - $24.07 Astra - $22.78 I’d pick Opus for the looks. Which island would you choose? 👀

The jelly world has reached the Arctic 🧊 Claude Opus 5.5 vs ChatGPT-6 Astra I prefer Opus’s colors and models: the rich blue water, the island, and the little details look nicer to me. Astra’s storm impressed me more - moving the mouse really gets the water raging Estimated API cost: Opus - $24.07 Astra - $22.78 I’d pick Opus for the looks. Which island would you choose? 👀

Vib3Coded

12,824 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

I've been using Opus 5.5 over the last week and ran a TON of tokens through it. I can tell you it's def on the fable level It's VERY good at 3D modeling. I had it render the top 500 gym equipment pieces and create a whole gym builder

I've been using Opus 5.5 over the last week and ran a TON of tokens through it. I can tell you it's def on the fable level It's VERY good at 3D modeling. I had it render the top 500 gym equipment pieces and create a whole gym builder

Wes Bos

226,398 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

Astra, what the hell is this shark? 😭🦈 Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra - same prompt, two very different sharks Astra made a hilarious little nightmare. Opus wins for me - it actually looks like a shark Opus: $10.35 Astra: $8.38 Saved $1.97 and got a shark that needs an exorcism 💀 Which one wins for you?

Astra, what the hell is this shark? 😭🦈 Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra - same prompt, two very different sharks Astra made a hilarious little nightmare. Opus wins for me - it actually looks like a shark Opus: $10.35 Astra: $8.38 Saved $1.97 and got a shark that needs an exorcism 💀 Which one wins for you?

Vib3Coded

110,803 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

I think I want to eat Sonnet’s tree 🍊😂 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol I’m going with Sonnet this time. The mandarins look juicier, the greens feel more natural, and the colors are more realistic overall. And that soft, bouncy wobble when you shake the tree makes me want to poke it Sol did a pretty good job too, especially for the price. But next to Sonnet, its tree looks more like shiny plastic than jelly Estimated API cost: Sonnet - $10.74 Sol - $4.01 Almost 2.7x the price. Would you pay extra for this look? 👀

I think I want to eat Sonnet’s tree 🍊😂 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol I’m going with Sonnet this time. The mandarins look juicier, the greens feel more natural, and the colors are more realistic overall. And that soft, bouncy wobble when you shake the tree makes me want to poke it Sol did a pretty good job too, especially for the price. But next to Sonnet, its tree looks more like shiny plastic than jelly Estimated API cost: Sonnet - $10.74 Sol - $4.01 Almost 2.7x the price. Would you pay extra for this look? 👀

Vib3Coded

18,445 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

Claude Code tip: if Opus 5.5 is already your main model, Fable 5.1 has been sitting idle this whole time. wire it in with /advisor start it with /advisor fable Opus 5.5 writes every line. Fable 5.1 reads the whole session, every tool call, and says nothing until one of three moments: → a plan gets proposed: is this actually the right move, or just the first one? → the same error comes back twice: is the search stuck, or is this a dead end? → the task gets marked done: what got missed while it was moving fast? Opus 5.5 ships. Fable 5.1 catches what would've shipped broken. Jev engineering makes the same move one layer down: forks that don't need a real thinker, which file, which tool, retry or give up, get routed to Jev and answered in under half a second. the expensive model only ever sees the forks that genuinely split. the tree this runs on: > Opus 5.5, high effort, owns the main session > explorer, medium effort, reads the code > worker, medium effort, edits and runs tests > researcher, medium effort, pulls the docs > Fable 5.1 outside all of it, on call, never writing a line itself drop the tree and this prompt into Claude Code: "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this tree: 1. Look in ~/.claude/agents and .claude/agents for subagents that already cover explorer, worker and researcher. Draft new ones only for roles that are missing. Set each to model: opus, effort: medium. If an existing subagent is pinned to a different model, list it, don't touch it. 2. Set the main session's effortLevel to high in ~/.claude/settings.json, and set advisorModel to fable. 3. Check for anything disabling the advisor: CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL, DISABLE_TELEMETRY, any variable blocking feature-flag fetches, and CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL, which overrides subagent effort. Report what you find. Change nothing yet. 4. Add one line to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md: consult the advisor before a large plan, when an error repeats, and before marking a long task done. Show every change as a diff first. Don't touch anything until I say go."

Claude Code tip: if Opus 5.5 is already your main model, Fable 5.1 has been sitting idle this whole time. wire it in with /advisor start it with /advisor fable Opus 5.5 writes every line. Fable 5.1 reads the whole session, every tool call, and says nothing until one of three moments: → a plan gets proposed: is this actually the right move, or just the first one? → the same error comes back twice: is the search stuck, or is this a dead end? → the task gets marked done: what got missed while it was moving fast? Opus 5.5 ships. Fable 5.1 catches what would've shipped broken. Jev engineering makes the same move one layer down: forks that don't need a real thinker, which file, which tool, retry or give up, get routed to Jev and answered in under half a second. the expensive model only ever sees the forks that genuinely split. the tree this runs on: > Opus 5.5, high effort, owns the main session > explorer, medium effort, reads the code > worker, medium effort, edits and runs tests > researcher, medium effort, pulls the docs > Fable 5.1 outside all of it, on call, never writing a line itself drop the tree and this prompt into Claude Code: "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this tree: 1. Look in ~/.claude/agents and .claude/agents for subagents that already cover explorer, worker and researcher. Draft new ones only for roles that are missing. Set each to model: opus, effort: medium. If an existing subagent is pinned to a different model, list it, don't touch it. 2. Set the main session's effortLevel to high in ~/.claude/settings.json, and set advisorModel to fable. 3. Check for anything disabling the advisor: CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL, DISABLE_TELEMETRY, any variable blocking feature-flag fetches, and CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL, which overrides subagent effort. Report what you find. Change nothing yet. 4. Add one line to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md: consult the advisor before a large plan, when an error repeats, and before marking a long task done. Show every change as a diff first. Don't touch anything until I say go."

Ryven

35,757 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

just one session opus 5.5 , its blowing my mind!! what a time to be alive..this was max 5 prompts work "touch grass" concept is live for tbh it feels better than fable and i dont think in near future i'm switching to codex :D what do you think? can astra beat this?

just one session opus 5.5 , its blowing my mind!! what a time to be alive..this was max 5 prompts work "touch grass" concept is live for tbh it feels better than fable and i dont think in near future i'm switching to codex :D what do you think? can astra beat this?

sk builds

16,844 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

I need a minute to process the result of this animation made with Opus 5.5 And I asked it to explain how it pulled it off, and my mind got blown all over again. I'll leave you the prompt too 👇

I need a minute to process the result of this animation made with Opus 5.5 And I asked it to explain how it pulled it off, and my mind got blown all over again. I'll leave you the prompt too 👇

Koldo Huici

72,283 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

claude fable + seedance 2.0 finds 5-star airbnbs with amateur photos. then it them into a cinematic ad and mails the host a postcard (fable is just the orchestrator. other tools handle the other tasks) the system you can sell to property managers: - it scrapes the market and keeps the 5.0s with barely any reviews - it skips anything a management company already runs - claude fable reads the galleries and keeps the ones the photos undersell - it pulls the real guest reviews and puts each quote on its matching shot - seedance 2.0 turns their own photos into a cinematic reel - white-label it and the property manager wins the door you can automate this whole process with your openclaw/hermes agent reply "REEL" + RT and i'll send you a free guide so you can build this too (must be following so i can DM you)

claude fable + seedance 2.0 finds 5-star airbnbs with amateur photos. then it them into a cinematic ad and mails the host a postcard (fable is just the orchestrator. other tools handle the other tasks) the system you can sell to property managers: - it scrapes the market and keeps the 5.0s with barely any reviews - it skips anything a management company already runs - claude fable reads the galleries and keeps the ones the photos undersell - it pulls the real guest reviews and puts each quote on its matching shot - seedance 2.0 turns their own photos into a cinematic reel - white-label it and the property manager wins the door you can automate this whole process with your openclaw/hermes agent reply "REEL" + RT and i'll send you a free guide so you can build this too (must be following so i can DM you)

Chris

40,370 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Anthropic shouldn't have revealed this plugin. Its name speaks for itself "You should know" Its capability: Opus 5.5 writes, the second agent reads, garbage aside: you get only important and reliable information Opus 5.5 can run continuously for 60 minutes, generating long summaries that nobody checks And this is what many miss: > a test it skipped "for now" > a file it modified even though you didn't ask for it > a warning "this might break the system" hidden somewhere at the bottom All of this is written there. You just never saw it Now another AI checks the text for you This is an automatic feature Enabled with a single line: ⁠/plugin enable cc-plugin-you-should-know@builtin⁠ Do this when you start working: > Open Claude Code > Paste the line above > Give Opus a long task and see how it analyzes the text and eliminates obvious errors Now the agent won't waste your money: you will get the expected result Bookmark this

Anthropic shouldn't have revealed this plugin. Its name speaks for itself "You should know" Its capability: Opus 5.5 writes, the second agent reads, garbage aside: you get only important and reliable information Opus 5.5 can run continuously for 60 minutes, generating long summaries that nobody checks And this is what many miss: > a test it skipped "for now" > a file it modified even though you didn't ask for it > a warning "this might break the system" hidden somewhere at the bottom All of this is written there. You just never saw it Now another AI checks the text for you This is an automatic feature Enabled with a single line: ⁠/plugin enable cc-plugin-you-should-know@builtin⁠ Do this when you start working: > Open Claude Code > Paste the line above > Give Opus a long task and see how it analyzes the text and eliminates obvious errors Now the agent won't waste your money: you will get the expected result Bookmark this

Bober_smart

31,838 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

This is f*cking insane. This tip saved me thousands of dollars. run Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, and Fable 5.1 together, and stop burning Opus on work it was never needed for. the whole idea in one line: the strong model plans, the mid-tier model executes, Fable stays quiet until it's actually needed. roles, broken down: Opus 5.5, high effort, owns the plan and ships the final code Sonnet 5.5, medium effort, splits into explorer (reads the codebase), worker (edits files, runs tests), researcher (pulls docs) Fable 5.1, called through /advisor fable, reads everything happening in the session but stays silent unless something's actually wrong three moments where Fable speaks: → a plan goes out: is this actually the right call? → the same failure shows up again: is the search going nowhere? → the task gets marked finished: did something get skipped? Jev engineering does the same thing one level down. the forks that don't need real thought, which file, which tool, keep going or stop, go straight to Jev and come back in under half a second. the big models only ever see the forks that genuinely need a decision. anyone still running one model for everything is paying Opus prices to decide whether a file exists. drop this into Claude Code: "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this structure: Look through ~/.claude/agents and .claude/agents for subagents already covering explorer, worker, and researcher. Only create new ones for roles that are missing. Set model: sonnet, effort: medium on each. If an existing subagent is locked to a different model, leave it as is and just list it. In ~/.claude/settings.json, set effortLevel to high and advisorModel to fable. Check for anything disabling the advisor, CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL, DISABLE_TELEMETRY, or anything blocking feature-flag fetches, plus CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL, which can override subagent effort settings. Report what you find. Don't change any of it yet. Add one line to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md: check in with the advisor before a big plan, when the same error shows up twice, and before marking a long task done. Show every change as a diff first. Wait for my go-ahead before touching anything."

This is f*cking insane. This tip saved me thousands of dollars. run Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, and Fable 5.1 together, and stop burning Opus on work it was never needed for. the whole idea in one line: the strong model plans, the mid-tier model executes, Fable stays quiet until it's actually needed. roles, broken down: Opus 5.5, high effort, owns the plan and ships the final code Sonnet 5.5, medium effort, splits into explorer (reads the codebase), worker (edits files, runs tests), researcher (pulls docs) Fable 5.1, called through /advisor fable, reads everything happening in the session but stays silent unless something's actually wrong three moments where Fable speaks: → a plan goes out: is this actually the right call? → the same failure shows up again: is the search going nowhere? → the task gets marked finished: did something get skipped? Jev engineering does the same thing one level down. the forks that don't need real thought, which file, which tool, keep going or stop, go straight to Jev and come back in under half a second. the big models only ever see the forks that genuinely need a decision. anyone still running one model for everything is paying Opus prices to decide whether a file exists. drop this into Claude Code: "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this structure: Look through ~/.claude/agents and .claude/agents for subagents already covering explorer, worker, and researcher. Only create new ones for roles that are missing. Set model: sonnet, effort: medium on each. If an existing subagent is locked to a different model, leave it as is and just list it. In ~/.claude/settings.json, set effortLevel to high and advisorModel to fable. Check for anything disabling the advisor, CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL, DISABLE_TELEMETRY, or anything blocking feature-flag fetches, plus CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL, which can override subagent effort settings. Report what you find. Don't change any of it yet. Add one line to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md: check in with the advisor before a big plan, when the same error shows up twice, and before marking a long task done. Show every change as a diff first. Wait for my go-ahead before touching anything."

rvaniaaa

250,263 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

made this with text to lottie and claude code my workflow: design something in figma or just make a rough draft. then ask claude to animate it you'd be surprised how easy it is to add easings, masks, transforms, text effects and all the motion details you can also ask claude to export it as a gif, mp4, png sequence, resize it in different aspect ratios claude and codex already creates something with taste and if you know what you want to create, this workflow is really useful and btw, it's free

made this with text to lottie and claude code my workflow: design something in figma or just make a rough draft. then ask claude to animate it you'd be surprised how easy it is to add easings, masks, transforms, text effects and all the motion details you can also ask claude to export it as a gif, mp4, png sequence, resize it in different aspect ratios claude and codex already creates something with taste and if you know what you want to create, this workflow is really useful and btw, it's free

Doruk

14,966 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Fable 5 + Goose Ads is insane – literally a full ad-creative team right in Claude Code. 1. Install the skill: npx gooseworks install --all npx gooseworks login 2. Ask Claude Fable to make ads for your brand. /goose-ads create ads for my brand . Fable 5 pulls the ads already winning in your space and rebuilds them on-brand – your product, your palette, your copy – a whole batch, ready to test. It can ship a month of creative testing in a single prompt. This is also possible with Opus and Sonnet, but Fable's brand research is next level. Link below.

Shiv

223,176 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Dentist did a 3D X-ray of my jaw before a root canal and said I wouldn't be able to open the raw data, it needs specialized software. It's 800 DICOM files. Asked Claude Code with Opus 5.5 to make me a viewer. A single prompt later... this is nicer than what he showed me on his screen, and even better than what Fable did a few weeks ago!

Dentist did a 3D X-ray of my jaw before a root canal and said I wouldn't be able to open the raw data, it needs specialized software. It's 800 DICOM files. Asked Claude Code with Opus 5.5 to make me a viewer. A single prompt later... this is nicer than what he showed me on his screen, and even better than what Fable did a few weeks ago!

Paolo Rosson

80,517 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

This Mac launch film is 100% code. Opus 5.5 made the notch, the widgets and the wallpapers from one brief. The bit that made the difference was the free apple-design skill. I had it tear apart my first version, list everything that looked cheap, and rebuild it. Full brief is here if you want to try it:

This Mac launch film is 100% code. Opus 5.5 made the notch, the widgets and the wallpapers from one brief. The bit that made the difference was the free apple-design skill. I had it tear apart my first version, list everything that looked cheap, and rebuild it. Full brief is here if you want to try it:

Charlie Hills

19,867 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen