正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🚨 REMEMBER WHEN AMY KLOBUCHAR WARNED ABOUT VOTING MACHINES? Years before the 2020 election, Senator Amy Klobuchar publicly raised concerns about outdated election equipment, cybersecurity vulnerabilities and the small number of companies controlling America’s voting systems. Now, questions are being raised about Minnesota’s August 11 Republican gubernatorial primary. An...

RealLindellTV's profile picture

LindellTV

113,068 subscribers

57,792 次观看 • 16 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术健康养生新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 QUESTIONS GROW OVER MINNESOTA’S PRIMARY RESULTS: NEGATIVE VOTES + VIRTUALLY UNCHANGED PERCENTAGES With just 6.7% of the vote reported compared to 93.7%, the candidates’ percentages were virtually unchanged. Then there’s this: reported vote totals actually went DOWN. Mike Lindell points to county-level data showing negative vote adjustments affecting not just him, but Lisa Demuth, Kendall Qualls and other candidates. As votes poured in from different parts of Minnesota, why did the percentages remain so remarkably consistent? And why were reported vote totals going backwards? That’s exactly why Lindell is pushing for a full hand count of the actual paper ballots. See the evidence and support the recount at
8:13

🚨 QUESTIONS GROW OVER MINNESOTA’S PRIMARY RESULTS: NEGATIVE VOTES + VIRTUALLY UNCHANGED PERCENTAGES With just 6.7% of the vote reported compared to 93.7%, the candidates’ percentages were virtually unchanged. Then there’s this: reported vote totals actually went DOWN. Mike Lindell points to county-level data showing negative vote adjustments affecting not just him, but Lisa Demuth, Kendall Qualls and other candidates. As votes poured in from different parts of Minnesota, why did the percentages remain so remarkably consistent? And why were reported vote totals going backwards? That’s exactly why Lindell is pushing for a full hand count of the actual paper ballots. See the evidence and support the recount at

LindellTV

83,052 次观看 • 16 天前

🚨 TEXAS PRIMARY “PREVIEW”? DISAPPEARING VOTES RAISE NEW ALARMS 🚨 As new concerns emerge out of Texas, Mike Lindell is warning that what’s being seen now could be a preview of what’s coming in the midterms. Newly reported irregularities during early voting - including votes appearing, disappearing, and even moving backwards - are something Lindell says should be impossible in a secure election system. The key lies in cast vote records, which track the exact order votes are counted. In a normal system, those numbers should only move forward - never in reverse. When they don’t, it raises serious questions and flags potential machine manipulation. Lindell says this isn’t just about one state - it’s about the broader system. From primaries to general elections, he warns that voting machines (not voters) could be deciding outcomes if safeguards aren’t put in place. That’s why he’s continuing to push for a nationwide shift to paper ballots and transparent, verifiable counting - especially before the next election cycle. With the stakes higher than ever, Lindell is urging Americans to stay engaged, demand answers, and support efforts to secure elections - which is one of the reasons why he is running for governor in Minnesota. 👉 Learn more here: The question now: will anything change before it’s too late? 👇
7:33

🚨 TEXAS PRIMARY “PREVIEW”? DISAPPEARING VOTES RAISE NEW ALARMS 🚨 As new concerns emerge out of Texas, Mike Lindell is warning that what’s being seen now could be a preview of what’s coming in the midterms. Newly reported irregularities during early voting - including votes appearing, disappearing, and even moving backwards - are something Lindell says should be impossible in a secure election system. The key lies in cast vote records, which track the exact order votes are counted. In a normal system, those numbers should only move forward - never in reverse. When they don’t, it raises serious questions and flags potential machine manipulation. Lindell says this isn’t just about one state - it’s about the broader system. From primaries to general elections, he warns that voting machines (not voters) could be deciding outcomes if safeguards aren’t put in place. That’s why he’s continuing to push for a nationwide shift to paper ballots and transparent, verifiable counting - especially before the next election cycle. With the stakes higher than ever, Lindell is urging Americans to stay engaged, demand answers, and support efforts to secure elections - which is one of the reasons why he is running for governor in Minnesota. 👉 Learn more here: The question now: will anything change before it’s too late? 👇

LindellTV

67,241 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 “IT’S WORSE THAN I THOUGHT.” After casting his ballot in Minnesota’s Republican Primary for Governor, Mike Lindell reacted to the voting process and raised concerns about voter ID requirements and how ballots are processed. “No ID whatsoever. You stick the paper into the machine and it’s gone.” Lindell says it’s “all hands on deck” tonight as his teams watch the election, while LindellTV tracks the results as they come in. Mike is now headed to the watch party. TONIGHT | 8–11 PM ET LIVE RESULTS, REPORTS & INTERVIEWS ONLY ON LINDELLTV!
3:39

🚨 “IT’S WORSE THAN I THOUGHT.” After casting his ballot in Minnesota’s Republican Primary for Governor, Mike Lindell reacted to the voting process and raised concerns about voter ID requirements and how ballots are processed. “No ID whatsoever. You stick the paper into the machine and it’s gone.” Lindell says it’s “all hands on deck” tonight as his teams watch the election, while LindellTV tracks the results as they come in. Mike is now headed to the watch party. TONIGHT | 8–11 PM ET LIVE RESULTS, REPORTS & INTERVIEWS ONLY ON LINDELLTV!

LindellTV

194,134 次观看 • 24 天前

MIKE LINDELL SUES AFTER MINNESOTA’S ELECTION “BAIT AND SWITCH” Mike Lindell says Minnesota pulled a “bait and switch” after he sought a privately funded hand count of the paper ballots. According to Lindell, his team was prepared to pay for the count and had more than 1,000 people ready to observe. But he says officials then informed him they would only conduct a conditional recount rather than count all of the ballots. Lindell says he stopped the payment at the “zero hour” and took the fight to the Minnesota Supreme Court. “We filed the lawsuit.” Now, he says the fight is about getting the election records, exposing what happened, and ultimately getting rid of electronic voting machines. Support and read the court documents at
5:21

MIKE LINDELL SUES AFTER MINNESOTA’S ELECTION “BAIT AND SWITCH” Mike Lindell says Minnesota pulled a “bait and switch” after he sought a privately funded hand count of the paper ballots. According to Lindell, his team was prepared to pay for the count and had more than 1,000 people ready to observe. But he says officials then informed him they would only conduct a conditional recount rather than count all of the ballots. Lindell says he stopped the payment at the “zero hour” and took the fight to the Minnesota Supreme Court. “We filed the lawsuit.” Now, he says the fight is about getting the election records, exposing what happened, and ultimately getting rid of electronic voting machines. Support and read the court documents at

LindellTV

76,324 次观看 • 10 天前

🚨 MIKE LINDELL: “THE MACHINES BROKE DOWN... SO THEY SAY.” 🚨 You couldn't script this any better. At the Minnesota GOP Convention, the electronic voting "clickers" used to endorse a candidate for governor reportedly malfunctioned, causing hours of delays and chaos. Just as delegates debated whether to switch to paper ballots, trust in the system began to unravel. Mike Lindell says the irony is impossible to ignore. After spending nearly five years warning about electronic voting systems, he found himself in a governor's convention where the machines suddenly stopped working. “Pretty easy solution: paper ballots, hand counted.” Now Lindell's team is demanding the release of the clicker contracts, testing records, log files, vote data, network configurations, and audit information so delegates can verify their votes were counted correctly. The fight over election integrity in Minnesota is just heating up.
7:41

🚨 MIKE LINDELL: “THE MACHINES BROKE DOWN... SO THEY SAY.” 🚨 You couldn't script this any better. At the Minnesota GOP Convention, the electronic voting "clickers" used to endorse a candidate for governor reportedly malfunctioned, causing hours of delays and chaos. Just as delegates debated whether to switch to paper ballots, trust in the system began to unravel. Mike Lindell says the irony is impossible to ignore. After spending nearly five years warning about electronic voting systems, he found himself in a governor's convention where the machines suddenly stopped working. “Pretty easy solution: paper ballots, hand counted.” Now Lindell's team is demanding the release of the clicker contracts, testing records, log files, vote data, network configurations, and audit information so delegates can verify their votes were counted correctly. The fight over election integrity in Minnesota is just heating up.

LindellTV

63,378 次观看 • 3 个月前

And this is: Twenty years in the making, Georgia’s Dominion Rigging Systems DECLARED WRONG WINNER for the May 22, 2024 DeKalb County, Georgia District 2 Commission Primary. A decision by the election board was made to do a HAND RECOUNT to ensure accurate results of the election. It only became known because a candidate received no votes in the precinct where she and her husband lived and voted. When she reported the problem to the DeKalb Election Board, they ordered a machine recount that produced the SAME RESULTS AGAIN. They then conducted a hand count of the race that proved the voting system shorted the candidate 3049 of her actual 4078 votes, over 74% of her total votes. The system gave 1456 of her votes to one of her opponents and failed to count another 1805 of her votes. Ban, dismantle, eliminate, and excommunicate every single voting machine across America.
0:32

And this is: Twenty years in the making, Georgia’s Dominion Rigging Systems DECLARED WRONG WINNER for the May 22, 2024 DeKalb County, Georgia District 2 Commission Primary. A decision by the election board was made to do a HAND RECOUNT to ensure accurate results of the election. It only became known because a candidate received no votes in the precinct where she and her husband lived and voted. When she reported the problem to the DeKalb Election Board, they ordered a machine recount that produced the SAME RESULTS AGAIN. They then conducted a hand count of the race that proved the voting system shorted the candidate 3049 of her actual 4078 votes, over 74% of her total votes. The system gave 1456 of her votes to one of her opponents and failed to count another 1805 of her votes. Ban, dismantle, eliminate, and excommunicate every single voting machine across America.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

2,274,741 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 WHY WERE 78 MILLION AMERICAN VOTES SENT OVERSEAS? 🚨 If you want to understand why millions of Americans still have questions about the 2020 election, start with this: Why were votes from 800 counties across 7 states reportedly routed through Scytl, a Spanish election technology company in Barcelona that had entered bankruptcy proceedings shortly before the election? Scytl's own materials highlighted its role in U.S. election infrastructure. The company was also involved in overseas election systems that later faced scrutiny over security vulnerabilities and vote integrity concerns. Now add in the bigger questions: - Why are critical election systems operated through layers of private vendors, subcontractors, and shell companies? - Why do electronic voting systems still raise cybersecurity concerns from experts across the political spectrum? - Why is there still no universal standard for transparent chain of custody? Chain of custody matters. If Americans can't easily follow where votes go, who handles them, and how they're processed, public confidence suffers. This shouldn't be a Republican issue or a Democrat issue. It should be an American issue. Because fair elections require trust and trust requires answers.
6:56

🚨 WHY WERE 78 MILLION AMERICAN VOTES SENT OVERSEAS? 🚨 If you want to understand why millions of Americans still have questions about the 2020 election, start with this: Why were votes from 800 counties across 7 states reportedly routed through Scytl, a Spanish election technology company in Barcelona that had entered bankruptcy proceedings shortly before the election? Scytl's own materials highlighted its role in U.S. election infrastructure. The company was also involved in overseas election systems that later faced scrutiny over security vulnerabilities and vote integrity concerns. Now add in the bigger questions: - Why are critical election systems operated through layers of private vendors, subcontractors, and shell companies? - Why do electronic voting systems still raise cybersecurity concerns from experts across the political spectrum? - Why is there still no universal standard for transparent chain of custody? Chain of custody matters. If Americans can't easily follow where votes go, who handles them, and how they're processed, public confidence suffers. This shouldn't be a Republican issue or a Democrat issue. It should be an American issue. Because fair elections require trust and trust requires answers.

LindellTV

45,980 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 DEMOCRATS & EXPERTS WARNED FOR YEARS: VOTING MACHINES ARE HACKABLE & VULNERABLE🚨 - Sheila Jackson Lee: "We need to look at all the voting machines... I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable." - Ron Wyden: Hackers can breach machines in minutes. Votes deleted or switched in Georgia and Texas. Vendors violate basic cybersecurity. - Ted Lieu, Amy Klobuchar, Kamala Harris: Machines can be hacked easily. Outdated systems controlled by few companies. Workers demonstrated switching votes. Virginia stopped using touchscreen machines due to risks. Democrats warned about this for years — now they pretend it's impossible. Hypocrisy exposed. Secure our elections with paper ballots, voter ID, and citizenship checks. No more excuses. 🇺🇸
1:57

🚨 DEMOCRATS & EXPERTS WARNED FOR YEARS: VOTING MACHINES ARE HACKABLE & VULNERABLE🚨 - Sheila Jackson Lee: "We need to look at all the voting machines... I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable." - Ron Wyden: Hackers can breach machines in minutes. Votes deleted or switched in Georgia and Texas. Vendors violate basic cybersecurity. - Ted Lieu, Amy Klobuchar, Kamala Harris: Machines can be hacked easily. Outdated systems controlled by few companies. Workers demonstrated switching votes. Virginia stopped using touchscreen machines due to risks. Democrats warned about this for years — now they pretend it's impossible. Hypocrisy exposed. Secure our elections with paper ballots, voter ID, and citizenship checks. No more excuses. 🇺🇸

And We Know©🇺🇸

11,009 次观看 • 1 个月前

"As an officer of the court, you were willing to put your name on a legal pleading alleging that the machines used in Georgia in 2018 were switching votes illegally from one candidate to another. Is that correct?" "YES." When a lawyer working for a top Democrat operative admits under oath that voting machines in Georgia SWITCHED VOTES from one candidate to another, we have a huge security problem in our elections. What's even more alarming is the machines that were used in that 2018 election that switched votes, were already a major concern when Garland Favorito from VoterGA warned the SOS that those machines were compromised, which the SOS did nothing about until years later. Here's where it gets worse. The machines were finally banned right before the 2020 election and replaced with Dominion machines and software, which were even more vulnerable and lacked security, audit capabilities and paper trails, implemented QR codes, etc., and featured backdoors which can be remotely accessed anywhere in the world with the capability to alter and manipulate anything in an election.
4:22

"As an officer of the court, you were willing to put your name on a legal pleading alleging that the machines used in Georgia in 2018 were switching votes illegally from one candidate to another. Is that correct?" "YES." When a lawyer working for a top Democrat operative admits under oath that voting machines in Georgia SWITCHED VOTES from one candidate to another, we have a huge security problem in our elections. What's even more alarming is the machines that were used in that 2018 election that switched votes, were already a major concern when Garland Favorito from VoterGA warned the SOS that those machines were compromised, which the SOS did nothing about until years later. Here's where it gets worse. The machines were finally banned right before the 2020 election and replaced with Dominion machines and software, which were even more vulnerable and lacked security, audit capabilities and paper trails, implemented QR codes, etc., and featured backdoors which can be remotely accessed anywhere in the world with the capability to alter and manipulate anything in an election.

The SCIF

54,302 次观看 • 22 天前

A forensic analysis of Georgia's 2020 election process identified where vote totals were changed and exactly where it occurred during the machine-to-machine transfers of SD memory cards, from before they left their starting location, to where they were physically transferred to, when they arrive at their final location to be reported out. These physical cards, which store the vote data before final reporting, are carried by hand between machines and locations. Because the transfers involve human intermediaries and lack documented logs or chain-of-custody records, the cards can be exchanged or altered in transit. Remember all of the shady hand-offs of SD cards caught on camera, especially in Georgia, or mention of memory cards throughout the country during all the court hearings about the stolen 2020 election? These SD cards are key. The observed differences in recorded totals between the cards' departure from the originating machines and their arrival at the central reporting site coincide precisely when the cards first leave to when they reach their final destination and are reported out.
6:19

A forensic analysis of Georgia's 2020 election process identified where vote totals were changed and exactly where it occurred during the machine-to-machine transfers of SD memory cards, from before they left their starting location, to where they were physically transferred to, when they arrive at their final location to be reported out. These physical cards, which store the vote data before final reporting, are carried by hand between machines and locations. Because the transfers involve human intermediaries and lack documented logs or chain-of-custody records, the cards can be exchanged or altered in transit. Remember all of the shady hand-offs of SD cards caught on camera, especially in Georgia, or mention of memory cards throughout the country during all the court hearings about the stolen 2020 election? These SD cards are key. The observed differences in recorded totals between the cards' departure from the originating machines and their arrival at the central reporting site coincide precisely when the cards first leave to when they reach their final destination and are reported out.

The SCIF

19,942 次观看 • 28 天前

Michigan Democrats are terrified Biden will implode and drag them down. So today they bet the bank and went all out to codify election fraud into state statute with SB 603. Today they smashed through this gigantic pile of election-fraud-enabling legislation today with Democrat only votes. SB603 Repeals current law that gives authority to bipartisan county Boards of Canvassers to investigate fraud and other wrongdoing including ballot tampering during recounts. With the passage of their (election-fraud-enabling) Bill, there will be no future route for requesting a recount if you believe there was fraud. Under their corruption bill, candidates will be prohibited from requesting a recount if they suspect fraud and is designed to stop investigations of election fraud by the Board of Canvassers. This disgusting bill will now permit clerks to recount ballots even if seals are broken on ballot containers and was essentially written by the Secretary of State who was reversed multiple times, by our Supreme Court for her illegal election decisions. The bill changes the standard for a candidate or party to petition for a recount of election results from alleging there has been “mistake or fraud” in the process to now only permitting alleging there has been an “error.” So even if the candidate or Party is absolutely convinced there was fraud, this cannot be alleged or investigated. To boot, this Democrat’s bill makes it tougher to do a recount by doubling the recount petition fees and making it a felony for 'interfering' with a recount without any clear definition of what that means to open up more “LAWFARE.” If passed as is, the language is changed to prohibit a recount, investigation or audit of the conduct of an election when fraud is alleged to only a determination of the number of votes cast for one candidate or another, or a ballot question. Lastly, the bill says a recount could not assess the qualification of the voters participating in an election, or the manner in which ballots are applied for, or issued to voters. Wow isn’t that a doozy. If illegals, or dead people, or those not registered in Mich. are voting, we cannot “assess the qualification of those voters or the manner in which those ballots were applied for and issued to these voters.” Yep, the Democrats have completely thrown off the mask with this terrible bill attempting to win at any cost-our Republic... be damned.
2:01

Michigan Democrats are terrified Biden will implode and drag them down. So today they bet the bank and went all out to codify election fraud into state statute with SB 603. Today they smashed through this gigantic pile of election-fraud-enabling legislation today with Democrat only votes. SB603 Repeals current law that gives authority to bipartisan county Boards of Canvassers to investigate fraud and other wrongdoing including ballot tampering during recounts. With the passage of their (election-fraud-enabling) Bill, there will be no future route for requesting a recount if you believe there was fraud. Under their corruption bill, candidates will be prohibited from requesting a recount if they suspect fraud and is designed to stop investigations of election fraud by the Board of Canvassers. This disgusting bill will now permit clerks to recount ballots even if seals are broken on ballot containers and was essentially written by the Secretary of State who was reversed multiple times, by our Supreme Court for her illegal election decisions. The bill changes the standard for a candidate or party to petition for a recount of election results from alleging there has been “mistake or fraud” in the process to now only permitting alleging there has been an “error.” So even if the candidate or Party is absolutely convinced there was fraud, this cannot be alleged or investigated. To boot, this Democrat’s bill makes it tougher to do a recount by doubling the recount petition fees and making it a felony for 'interfering' with a recount without any clear definition of what that means to open up more “LAWFARE.” If passed as is, the language is changed to prohibit a recount, investigation or audit of the conduct of an election when fraud is alleged to only a determination of the number of votes cast for one candidate or another, or a ballot question. Lastly, the bill says a recount could not assess the qualification of the voters participating in an election, or the manner in which ballots are applied for, or issued to voters. Wow isn’t that a doozy. If illegals, or dead people, or those not registered in Mich. are voting, we cannot “assess the qualification of those voters or the manner in which those ballots were applied for and issued to these voters.” Yep, the Democrats have completely thrown off the mask with this terrible bill attempting to win at any cost-our Republic... be damned.

Jim Runestad

126,341 次观看 • 2 年前

MUST WATCH:🚨 Watch this crucial 20-minute video featuring prominent Democrats, computer science professors, and election security experts discussing the vulnerabilities in America's election system. They warn that the system is online, easily hackable, and often operates on outdated Windows 7 or older systems. Key Points: Easily Hackable Voting Equipment: All electronic voting equipment can be hacked as they must receive programming before each election from memory cards prepared on election management systems. These systems are often connected to the internet and run outdated Windows versions. Spread of Malware: If a county election management system is infected with malware, it can spread to USB drives, which then transfer it to voting machines, scanners, and ballot-marking devices throughout the county. Programming Practices: Most U.S. election systems are programmed by local county officials or third-party vendors. They use previously used USB drives on internet-connected computers before plugging them into scanners, tabulators, and voting machines. Outdated Systems: In 2019, the Associated Press reported that most of the 10,000 election jurisdictions, including swing states, were still using Windows 7 or older systems for ballot production, vote programming, counting, and reporting. End of Windows 7 Support: Windows 7 reached its end of life on January 14, 2020, with Microsoft stopping technical support and security updates. Remote Access and Modems: Voting machine manufacturers have installed remote-access software and wireless modems, connecting voting machines directly to the internet. NBC News reported in 2020 that ES&S, the largest U.S. election machine vendor, had installed at least 14,000 modems. Dominion Voting Systems: The second-largest vendor, Dominion, has publicly acknowledged using modems in their machines and running remote-access software during the 2020 election. For example, in Georgia, election worker Susan Voyles testified that Dominion employees operated remotely on ballot-marking devices and poll pads. Findings from Wisconsin and Michigan: Investigations found Dominion and ES&S machines online and connected to the internet. In Michigan, a modem chip was discovered in an ES&S voting machine, potentially allowing hackers to intercept and manipulate election results. Conclusion: Hackers can potentially infiltrate elections through vulnerable USB cards, election management systems, and voting machines themselves. This underscores the urgent need for securing America's election infrastructure.
21:51

MUST WATCH:🚨 Watch this crucial 20-minute video featuring prominent Democrats, computer science professors, and election security experts discussing the vulnerabilities in America's election system. They warn that the system is online, easily hackable, and often operates on outdated Windows 7 or older systems. Key Points: Easily Hackable Voting Equipment: All electronic voting equipment can be hacked as they must receive programming before each election from memory cards prepared on election management systems. These systems are often connected to the internet and run outdated Windows versions. Spread of Malware: If a county election management system is infected with malware, it can spread to USB drives, which then transfer it to voting machines, scanners, and ballot-marking devices throughout the county. Programming Practices: Most U.S. election systems are programmed by local county officials or third-party vendors. They use previously used USB drives on internet-connected computers before plugging them into scanners, tabulators, and voting machines. Outdated Systems: In 2019, the Associated Press reported that most of the 10,000 election jurisdictions, including swing states, were still using Windows 7 or older systems for ballot production, vote programming, counting, and reporting. End of Windows 7 Support: Windows 7 reached its end of life on January 14, 2020, with Microsoft stopping technical support and security updates. Remote Access and Modems: Voting machine manufacturers have installed remote-access software and wireless modems, connecting voting machines directly to the internet. NBC News reported in 2020 that ES&S, the largest U.S. election machine vendor, had installed at least 14,000 modems. Dominion Voting Systems: The second-largest vendor, Dominion, has publicly acknowledged using modems in their machines and running remote-access software during the 2020 election. For example, in Georgia, election worker Susan Voyles testified that Dominion employees operated remotely on ballot-marking devices and poll pads. Findings from Wisconsin and Michigan: Investigations found Dominion and ES&S machines online and connected to the internet. In Michigan, a modem chip was discovered in an ES&S voting machine, potentially allowing hackers to intercept and manipulate election results. Conclusion: Hackers can potentially infiltrate elections through vulnerable USB cards, election management systems, and voting machines themselves. This underscores the urgent need for securing America's election infrastructure.

KanekoaTheGreat

1,388,889 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨 Fulton County Spent Millions Hiding Ballots - Now the Feds Are Inside Yesterday, we heard Fulton County Commissioner Bridget Thorne (Commissioner Bridget Thorne) confirm what many suspected: “We… have spent millions of dollars in outside legal counsel to fight anybody from ever seeing the actual election materials, the actual ballots, since 2020.” All while officials admitted there were issues with the election and still blocked every effort to inspect the physical ballots. Then Georgia State Election Board Vice Chair Dr. Janice Johnston responded to Ossoff's Office calling this “a sore loser’s crusade”: “Senator Ossoff just doesn’t get it. This is not about President Trump. This is about the conduct of the election and the accurate counting of the ballots and the votes… This is about elections in Georgia for the people of Georgia.” Dr. Johnston says Fulton County: - Lawyered up the moment subpoenas were issued - Spent hundreds of thousands in taxpayer dollars fighting the State Election Board - Has almost 18,000 missing ballot images from the official recount - And over 380,000 ballot images not kept from election night (a violation of law and destruction of election records) “We already know there are violations with this 2020 election. The question is… was there obstruction or cover-up?” Now the FBI and U.S. Department of Justice have the ballots, envelopes, and records Fulton fought to hide for four years. This cover-up might be worse than the crime...
7:52

🚨 Fulton County Spent Millions Hiding Ballots - Now the Feds Are Inside Yesterday, we heard Fulton County Commissioner Bridget Thorne (Commissioner Bridget Thorne) confirm what many suspected: “We… have spent millions of dollars in outside legal counsel to fight anybody from ever seeing the actual election materials, the actual ballots, since 2020.” All while officials admitted there were issues with the election and still blocked every effort to inspect the physical ballots. Then Georgia State Election Board Vice Chair Dr. Janice Johnston responded to Ossoff's Office calling this “a sore loser’s crusade”: “Senator Ossoff just doesn’t get it. This is not about President Trump. This is about the conduct of the election and the accurate counting of the ballots and the votes… This is about elections in Georgia for the people of Georgia.” Dr. Johnston says Fulton County: - Lawyered up the moment subpoenas were issued - Spent hundreds of thousands in taxpayer dollars fighting the State Election Board - Has almost 18,000 missing ballot images from the official recount - And over 380,000 ballot images not kept from election night (a violation of law and destruction of election records) “We already know there are violations with this 2020 election. The question is… was there obstruction or cover-up?” Now the FBI and U.S. Department of Justice have the ballots, envelopes, and records Fulton fought to hide for four years. This cover-up might be worse than the crime...

LindellTV

37,847 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: Dallas County Going All In on Paper Ballots Big win for election integrity - Dallas County is ditching the machines. This marks the first county in the country moving ahead with this kind of model, and it’s being hailed as a prototype for real transparency nationwide. Why? Because machines are black boxes. You can’t audit what you can’t see. And when whistleblowers leave Smartmatic and pop up at Hart, Dominion changes its name to “Liberty Vote,” and lawsuits are buried, it starts looking less like a system and more like an election cartel. It’s not complicated. The solution is already here: paper ballots, hand counted, one election day. The fight is execution. And the clock is ticking.
2:57

🚨 BREAKING: Dallas County Going All In on Paper Ballots Big win for election integrity - Dallas County is ditching the machines. This marks the first county in the country moving ahead with this kind of model, and it’s being hailed as a prototype for real transparency nationwide. Why? Because machines are black boxes. You can’t audit what you can’t see. And when whistleblowers leave Smartmatic and pop up at Hart, Dominion changes its name to “Liberty Vote,” and lawsuits are buried, it starts looking less like a system and more like an election cartel. It’s not complicated. The solution is already here: paper ballots, hand counted, one election day. The fight is execution. And the clock is ticking.

LindellTV

44,524 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: 45,000 VOTE DISCREPANCY RAISES NEW QUESTIONS IN CALIFORNIA ELECTION Newly uncovered records are raising serious concerns about ballot counts in a California election, pointing to a major mismatch between ballots received and votes counted. According to official registrar data: • 611,000 ballots recorded • 658,000 votes counted • Roughly 45,000 vote discrepancy A California sheriff and gubernatorial candidate, Sheriff Chad Bianco, is now sounding the alarm after reviewing the records obtained through public records requests. “So where is the discrepancy?...This is a very simple investigation… just count the ballots.” But instead of answers, efforts to verify the totals are now being blocked in court. “They’re doing everything they can to prevent this from happening.” And here’s where it escalates: By law, those ballots could be destroyed within 30 days before they are ever fully examined. “If that happens… this evidence will never be seen.” So the question becomes: Why block a basic count? Why fight transparency? If everything is accurate, what’s the problem with verifying it?
3:43

🚨 BREAKING: 45,000 VOTE DISCREPANCY RAISES NEW QUESTIONS IN CALIFORNIA ELECTION Newly uncovered records are raising serious concerns about ballot counts in a California election, pointing to a major mismatch between ballots received and votes counted. According to official registrar data: • 611,000 ballots recorded • 658,000 votes counted • Roughly 45,000 vote discrepancy A California sheriff and gubernatorial candidate, Sheriff Chad Bianco, is now sounding the alarm after reviewing the records obtained through public records requests. “So where is the discrepancy?...This is a very simple investigation… just count the ballots.” But instead of answers, efforts to verify the totals are now being blocked in court. “They’re doing everything they can to prevent this from happening.” And here’s where it escalates: By law, those ballots could be destroyed within 30 days before they are ever fully examined. “If that happens… this evidence will never be seen.” So the question becomes: Why block a basic count? Why fight transparency? If everything is accurate, what’s the problem with verifying it?

LindellTV

24,350 次观看 • 5 个月前

NO MORE MACHINES OF ANY KIND‼️ Why would a voting system have a WEIGHTED RACE feature, allowing one candidate’s votes to be weighted more or less than the other candidate’s votes? Example: Candidate A - 1 vote = 2 votes. Candidate B - 1 vote = .5 votes. Let’s say out of 100 votes, the real results are as follows: Candidate A - 52 votes Candidate B - 48 votes Total - 100 votes With the Weighted Race Feature, based on the above example: Candidate A - 52 x 2 = 104 Candidate B - 48 x.5 = 24 Total - 128 votes So in addition to switching votes, now they also need additional fake ballots to make up for the missing 28 ballots. And, why would decimals be used in the counting of votes? 1 vote should always equal 1 vote. No decimals are needed. Machines were not brought in to make counting the votes faster. Machines were brought in to CHEAT, and it actually made counting take much longer, as they are able to manipulate numbers until they get what they need. States that brag they have paper only ballots instead of voting machines, but still use counting machines to count the ballots are STILL CHEATING! Our elections have been one big Psyop. This must end right here and right now!
0:29

NO MORE MACHINES OF ANY KIND‼️ Why would a voting system have a WEIGHTED RACE feature, allowing one candidate’s votes to be weighted more or less than the other candidate’s votes? Example: Candidate A - 1 vote = 2 votes. Candidate B - 1 vote = .5 votes. Let’s say out of 100 votes, the real results are as follows: Candidate A - 52 votes Candidate B - 48 votes Total - 100 votes With the Weighted Race Feature, based on the above example: Candidate A - 52 x 2 = 104 Candidate B - 48 x.5 = 24 Total - 128 votes So in addition to switching votes, now they also need additional fake ballots to make up for the missing 28 ballots. And, why would decimals be used in the counting of votes? 1 vote should always equal 1 vote. No decimals are needed. Machines were not brought in to make counting the votes faster. Machines were brought in to CHEAT, and it actually made counting take much longer, as they are able to manipulate numbers until they get what they need. States that brag they have paper only ballots instead of voting machines, but still use counting machines to count the ballots are STILL CHEATING! Our elections have been one big Psyop. This must end right here and right now!

RealAF Patriot

13,861 次观看 • 8 个月前

IMPORTANT ‼️ Undeniably Proof Out Of Georgia That Dominion Voting Is Rigging United States Elections. Confirmed With A Hand Count Of Ballots, This Is SHOCKING 🚨 “The result from the Dominion machine showed Lorne Alexander received 34.67% of the vote, Marshall Orson receiving 41.35% of the vote, and Michelle Longspears receiving 23.98% of the vote.The result from the Dominion machine showed Lorne Alexander received 34.67% of the vote, Marshall Orson receiving 41.35% of the vote, and Michelle Longspears receiving 23.98% of the vote. In Georgia, if one candidate doesn't get above 50% of the vote total, a runoff election is automatically held between the two top candidates. Meaning Michelle Longspierce was cut out of the race. But Michelle Longspierce felt odd about the numbers, so she visited different precincts to double check the tallies. Guess what? She noticed that in some precincts she didn't receive a single vote. But how is that possible that a candidate with 24% of the vote total finds precincts where she didn't receive a single vote? While statistically alarming, the real surprise came when she realized there was not one vote cast for her in her own precinct, the same one where she and her husband voted for herself. Spears immediately demanded a hand recount of the results and got one. On June 1st the results were released and the difference between the Dominion machine count and the hand count was shocking. After the hand count Lauren Alexander gained 355 votes, Orson lost 1298 votes and Spears actually gained 3620 votes making her the new runoff candidate. And here's the best part, when you add them all up the hand count shows 2810 votes more than the Dominion machines reported on the 24th. This is huge. In a small county commissioners race with 15 and a half thousand votes total, the Dominion machine tally was short by nearly 3,000 votes. What does that say about all the other races that were conducted on these very same machines? This is proof that the machines cannot be trusted. If Spears had not sounded the alarm, no one would have been able to do this.”
1:59

IMPORTANT ‼️ Undeniably Proof Out Of Georgia That Dominion Voting Is Rigging United States Elections. Confirmed With A Hand Count Of Ballots, This Is SHOCKING 🚨 “The result from the Dominion machine showed Lorne Alexander received 34.67% of the vote, Marshall Orson receiving 41.35% of the vote, and Michelle Longspears receiving 23.98% of the vote.The result from the Dominion machine showed Lorne Alexander received 34.67% of the vote, Marshall Orson receiving 41.35% of the vote, and Michelle Longspears receiving 23.98% of the vote. In Georgia, if one candidate doesn't get above 50% of the vote total, a runoff election is automatically held between the two top candidates. Meaning Michelle Longspierce was cut out of the race. But Michelle Longspierce felt odd about the numbers, so she visited different precincts to double check the tallies. Guess what? She noticed that in some precincts she didn't receive a single vote. But how is that possible that a candidate with 24% of the vote total finds precincts where she didn't receive a single vote? While statistically alarming, the real surprise came when she realized there was not one vote cast for her in her own precinct, the same one where she and her husband voted for herself. Spears immediately demanded a hand recount of the results and got one. On June 1st the results were released and the difference between the Dominion machine count and the hand count was shocking. After the hand count Lauren Alexander gained 355 votes, Orson lost 1298 votes and Spears actually gained 3620 votes making her the new runoff candidate. And here's the best part, when you add them all up the hand count shows 2810 votes more than the Dominion machines reported on the 24th. This is huge. In a small county commissioners race with 15 and a half thousand votes total, the Dominion machine tally was short by nearly 3,000 votes. What does that say about all the other races that were conducted on these very same machines? This is proof that the machines cannot be trusted. If Spears had not sounded the alarm, no one would have been able to do this.”

Wall Street Apes

894,085 次观看 • 2 年前

Dr. Shiva exposes that up to 100,000 ballots were missing from the Massachusetts 2020 election, including the ballot images, with the secretary of state's office caught on tape saying that they didn't have them, which eliminates any type of audit. Diebold software, that is implemented in today's election software since 2001, has a weighted vote feature that secretly shift votes from one candidate to another in real time with no obvious tampering required, which allows a vote to be worth more than 1 vote, per 1 person, introducing decimals. New versions of election management systems were released around mid-2020, included options to disable or hide these manipulation tools, making audits nearly impossible. More votes than voters recorded in multiple instances during the MA 2020 primary/election cycle and. This is why votes were found across the country with fractional vote tallies. Just another method of how our elections are stolen, especially in 2020.
13:21

Dr. Shiva exposes that up to 100,000 ballots were missing from the Massachusetts 2020 election, including the ballot images, with the secretary of state's office caught on tape saying that they didn't have them, which eliminates any type of audit. Diebold software, that is implemented in today's election software since 2001, has a weighted vote feature that secretly shift votes from one candidate to another in real time with no obvious tampering required, which allows a vote to be worth more than 1 vote, per 1 person, introducing decimals. New versions of election management systems were released around mid-2020, included options to disable or hide these manipulation tools, making audits nearly impossible. More votes than voters recorded in multiple instances during the MA 2020 primary/election cycle and. This is why votes were found across the country with fractional vote tallies. Just another method of how our elections are stolen, especially in 2020.

The SCIF

17,288 次观看 • 3 个月前