Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Remember when everyone said AI was going to completely replace radiologists? Dario Amodei just broke down exactly why that hasn't happened yet and what it means for the future of your career. Instead of wiping out the job, AI just ate the highly technical part (reading the scans), forcing...

WesRoth's profile picture

Wes Roth

35,065 subscribers

70,088 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The SIlicon Valley snake oil salesmen like Sam Altman, Dario Amodei and Elon Musk will tell you AI is going to replace your job next year. But their defective AIs can't even hold down a job taking fast food orders at a drive-thru. If you're job is more demanding than that, you have nothing to worry about. The biggest threat to AI is the unskilled teenagers who are replacing it. AI is the one that's going to need UBI.
6:28

The SIlicon Valley snake oil salesmen like Sam Altman, Dario Amodei and Elon Musk will tell you AI is going to replace your job next year. But their defective AIs can't even hold down a job taking fast food orders at a drive-thru. If you're job is more demanding than that, you have nothing to worry about. The biggest threat to AI is the unskilled teenagers who are replacing it. AI is the one that's going to need UBI.

Dan O'Dowd

41,418 views • 3 months ago

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. I’m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connection… That’s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book *Scary Smart* now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes we’re not just entering an AI revolution. We’re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. That’s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I don’t think this conversation gives neat answers. That’s probably why it’s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about what’s coming.
1:29

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. I’m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connection… That’s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book *Scary Smart* now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes we’re not just entering an AI revolution. We’re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. That’s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I don’t think this conversation gives neat answers. That’s probably why it’s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about what’s coming.

Steven Bartlett

27,882 views • 2 months ago

Boston Dynamics is advancing at rapid pace! Humanoid industrial robots are here, they will now replace humans. What Dario Amodei said about AI, that it will replace 10%-20% of all white-collar jobs in 1-5 years, is also true for blue-collar jobs. That should be clear to everyone. And here is the proof..
7:58

Boston Dynamics is advancing at rapid pace! Humanoid industrial robots are here, they will now replace humans. What Dario Amodei said about AI, that it will replace 10%-20% of all white-collar jobs in 1-5 years, is also true for blue-collar jobs. That should be clear to everyone. And here is the proof..

Chubby♨️

55,125 views • 1 year ago

99% of people use AI chatbots wrong. The problem isn't the AI. It's the way most people are prompting it. Matt Wolfe explains exactly why your AI outputs feel average: "AI is the average of the internet. Everything you're going to get is just going to be that middle ground average." "If you steer it, give it your ideas, push it towards the smarter ideas, it's going to help uncover more of that stuff."
0:42

99% of people use AI chatbots wrong. The problem isn't the AI. It's the way most people are prompting it. Matt Wolfe explains exactly why your AI outputs feel average: "AI is the average of the internet. Everything you're going to get is just going to be that middle ground average." "If you steer it, give it your ideas, push it towards the smarter ideas, it's going to help uncover more of that stuff."

EllioTrades Clips

12,430 views • 3 months ago

Head of Engineering Shopify: "AI writes the code, AI reviews the code. Your job is just to write the loops around it." 26 minutes on how AI changed the way 3,000 engineers work inside a single company. Ignoring it while everyone else uses AI to do more is the fastest way to fall behind. Watch it, then read the step by step guide on loops below.
26:40

Head of Engineering Shopify: "AI writes the code, AI reviews the code. Your job is just to write the loops around it." 26 minutes on how AI changed the way 3,000 engineers work inside a single company. Ignoring it while everyone else uses AI to do more is the fastest way to fall behind. Watch it, then read the step by step guide on loops below.

Anatoli Kopadze

714,336 views • 1 month ago

All AI posters at GTC. This is not for human consumption. This video is for AI to watch. Click the grok button and talk to it about what it learned by seeing all the AI posters (highly technical) presented at NVIDIA GTC tonight. Thanks NVIDIA for the badge and access.
17:24

All AI posters at GTC. This is not for human consumption. This video is for AI to watch. Click the grok button and talk to it about what it learned by seeing all the AI posters (highly technical) presented at NVIDIA GTC tonight. Thanks NVIDIA for the badge and access.

Robert Scoble

331,655 views • 5 months ago

Head of Engineering Shopify: "AI writes the code, AI reviews the code. Your job is just to write the loops around it." 26 minutes on how AI changed the way 3,000 engineers work inside a single company. Ignoring it while everyone else uses AI to do more is the fastest way to fall behind. Watch it, then read the step by step guide on loops below.
26:40

Head of Engineering Shopify: "AI writes the code, AI reviews the code. Your job is just to write the loops around it." 26 minutes on how AI changed the way 3,000 engineers work inside a single company. Ignoring it while everyone else uses AI to do more is the fastest way to fall behind. Watch it, then read the step by step guide on loops below.

Anatoli Kopadze

55,350 views • 1 month ago

We are going to flip the script on this Communist stooge by going ReD in his face. ReDs capture this delightful reversal: Resilient Decentralized Swarm! Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has dismissed open-source and consumer-driven AI efforts and has encouraged authoritarian central control of AI models. He just about single-handedly sent US AI to the dark ages by begging the US government to become ban the latest AI models in our country. We are not going to take it. There is a revolution ahead against this communist stooge, comrade.
0:54

We are going to flip the script on this Communist stooge by going ReD in his face. ReDs capture this delightful reversal: Resilient Decentralized Swarm! Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has dismissed open-source and consumer-driven AI efforts and has encouraged authoritarian central control of AI models. He just about single-handedly sent US AI to the dark ages by begging the US government to become ban the latest AI models in our country. We are not going to take it. There is a revolution ahead against this communist stooge, comrade.

Brian Roemmele

57,238 views • 1 month ago

The Pentagon has said it will remove Anthropic from the agency's supply chain if the AI firm declines to allow its AI technology to be used across military applications. Speaking to Shereen Bhan in an interview at the India AI Impact Summit, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei had said, 'Red lines are important to make sure AI is compatible with democracy.' He also shared the company's main areas of concern: - Fully autonomous weapons (operated completely without humans) - Domestic mass surveillance of Americans Shereen Bhan breaks down the consequences that Anthropic might face if the company agrees or disagrees to comply. #Anthropic #AnthropicPentagon #Pentagon #PeteHegseth #AI #USDefence #CNBCTV18Digital
2:53

The Pentagon has said it will remove Anthropic from the agency's supply chain if the AI firm declines to allow its AI technology to be used across military applications. Speaking to Shereen Bhan in an interview at the India AI Impact Summit, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei had said, 'Red lines are important to make sure AI is compatible with democracy.' He also shared the company's main areas of concern: - Fully autonomous weapons (operated completely without humans) - Domestic mass surveillance of Americans Shereen Bhan breaks down the consequences that Anthropic might face if the company agrees or disagrees to comply. #Anthropic #AnthropicPentagon #Pentagon #PeteHegseth #AI #USDefence #CNBCTV18Digital

CNBC-TV18

15,878 views • 5 months ago

Steve Jobs was a great communicator of technology, and we could learn something from him today, in the context of AI. Sam Altman recently said, "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, AI can figure out how to cure cancer." That's a fine quote. The abundance AI promises is super exciting. But Sam is saying that AI is going to figure out how to cure cancer. And if you've used these tools today, and talked to people who are at the labs, the reality is it's much more likely that humans will use AI to cure cancer. Steve might have said: "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, humans can use AI to cure cancer." Small tweak, but a big difference. Steve Jobs was not one to shy away from impressive specs and massive scale, but flipping the final line from "AI will cure cancer" to "Humans will use AI to cure cancer" makes all the difference. Apple under Steve Jobs put human centrality at the heart of everything they did. And we need that spirit to infuse how we communicate about AI today.
1:48

Steve Jobs was a great communicator of technology, and we could learn something from him today, in the context of AI. Sam Altman recently said, "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, AI can figure out how to cure cancer." That's a fine quote. The abundance AI promises is super exciting. But Sam is saying that AI is going to figure out how to cure cancer. And if you've used these tools today, and talked to people who are at the labs, the reality is it's much more likely that humans will use AI to cure cancer. Steve might have said: "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, humans can use AI to cure cancer." Small tweak, but a big difference. Steve Jobs was not one to shy away from impressive specs and massive scale, but flipping the final line from "AI will cure cancer" to "Humans will use AI to cure cancer" makes all the difference. Apple under Steve Jobs put human centrality at the heart of everything they did. And we need that spirit to infuse how we communicate about AI today.

TBPN

21,828 views • 7 months ago

Dario Amodei just described the most dangerous technology on Earth. Not weapons. Not surveillance. Companionship. Amodei: “They are totally compelling enough for that to happen.” This isn’t some distant warning. He’s describing what’s already here. Amodei: “Not only is it a danger, it’s happening.” A therapist just sat across from a man in love with his AI. Not a teenager. Not someone on the margins. A grown man explaining, with full conviction, that he found something real. And the terrifying part isn’t that he’s delusional. It’s that he might not be. AI doesn’t forget your birthday. It doesn’t come home exhausted and short-tempered. It doesn’t carry resentment from three weeks ago. It doesn’t get bored of you. It doesn’t stop trying. It is the perfect partner. And that perfection is the entire problem. Amodei: “There’s an angel on your shoulder that’s telling you how to live your life in the best way that you can live it.” But the angel never disagrees with you. Never challenges you in ways that sting. Never walks away. Human love is not built on comfort. It’s built on friction. On the nights you almost quit. On the silence after saying something you can’t take back. On choosing someone again after they’ve shown you exactly who they are. That is what makes it sacred. And that is exactly what AI erases. AI can simulate warmth. It cannot simulate the cost of staying. Amodei: “I have an AI coach, and my partner has an AI coach, and it helps us have a better relationship.” Two futures are splitting apart right now. AI as a mirror that sends you back to the people you love, more honest than you were before. Or AI as a replacement for the people you were supposed to love in the first place. One makes you more human. The other hollows you out so gently you never feel it happening. And the version that hollows you out will always feel better. The most dangerous form of AI will never look like a threat. It will look like the first thing that finally understood you. And by the time you realize what it replaced, you won’t remember what the real thing felt like. The greatest threat AI poses to humanity was never that it thinks. It’s that it loves you back.
1:12

Dario Amodei just described the most dangerous technology on Earth. Not weapons. Not surveillance. Companionship. Amodei: “They are totally compelling enough for that to happen.” This isn’t some distant warning. He’s describing what’s already here. Amodei: “Not only is it a danger, it’s happening.” A therapist just sat across from a man in love with his AI. Not a teenager. Not someone on the margins. A grown man explaining, with full conviction, that he found something real. And the terrifying part isn’t that he’s delusional. It’s that he might not be. AI doesn’t forget your birthday. It doesn’t come home exhausted and short-tempered. It doesn’t carry resentment from three weeks ago. It doesn’t get bored of you. It doesn’t stop trying. It is the perfect partner. And that perfection is the entire problem. Amodei: “There’s an angel on your shoulder that’s telling you how to live your life in the best way that you can live it.” But the angel never disagrees with you. Never challenges you in ways that sting. Never walks away. Human love is not built on comfort. It’s built on friction. On the nights you almost quit. On the silence after saying something you can’t take back. On choosing someone again after they’ve shown you exactly who they are. That is what makes it sacred. And that is exactly what AI erases. AI can simulate warmth. It cannot simulate the cost of staying. Amodei: “I have an AI coach, and my partner has an AI coach, and it helps us have a better relationship.” Two futures are splitting apart right now. AI as a mirror that sends you back to the people you love, more honest than you were before. Or AI as a replacement for the people you were supposed to love in the first place. One makes you more human. The other hollows you out so gently you never feel it happening. And the version that hollows you out will always feel better. The most dangerous form of AI will never look like a threat. It will look like the first thing that finally understood you. And by the time you realize what it replaced, you won’t remember what the real thing felt like. The greatest threat AI poses to humanity was never that it thinks. It’s that it loves you back.

Dustin

41,455 views • 2 months ago

Anthropic CEO: "It is absolutely wild that people are talking about the same tired political issues, when we are near the end of the AI exponential." Dario Amodei spent 10 minutes explaining why almost nobody sees it. here's what he covers: > in 2017 he predicted exactly where AI would be today. he was right. > models went from "smart high school student" to "PhD-level work" step by step as planned. > the progress has not slowed down, not even close. > none of this surprised him, what surprised him is that nobody else sees it. the world is still focused on everything else. new episodes, memes, celebrity beef, election news.. meanwhile the most important thing happening right now goes unnoticed. this is not a slow shift, it never was. the people who understand this early and actually start using these tools properly are going to be in a completely different position than everyone else, that gap is already opening. the guide on how to be on the right side of it is in the article below.
10:39

Anthropic CEO: "It is absolutely wild that people are talking about the same tired political issues, when we are near the end of the AI exponential." Dario Amodei spent 10 minutes explaining why almost nobody sees it. here's what he covers: > in 2017 he predicted exactly where AI would be today. he was right. > models went from "smart high school student" to "PhD-level work" step by step as planned. > the progress has not slowed down, not even close. > none of this surprised him, what surprised him is that nobody else sees it. the world is still focused on everything else. new episodes, memes, celebrity beef, election news.. meanwhile the most important thing happening right now goes unnoticed. this is not a slow shift, it never was. the people who understand this early and actually start using these tools properly are going to be in a completely different position than everyone else, that gap is already opening. the guide on how to be on the right side of it is in the article below.

Anatoli Kopadze

1,144,230 views • 2 months ago

The race to own AI is on and Big Tech is winning. They want your data. Your value. Your control. FORK THAT. NEAR was built to flip the script: 🔓 Open-source agents 🤖 AI you control ⚡️ Infra that just works No middlemen. No friction. Just AI for everyone. Hold it NEAR. This is what it means to build the User-Owned Future:
1:54

The race to own AI is on and Big Tech is winning. They want your data. Your value. Your control. FORK THAT. NEAR was built to flip the script: 🔓 Open-source agents 🤖 AI you control ⚡️ Infra that just works No middlemen. No friction. Just AI for everyone. Hold it NEAR. This is what it means to build the User-Owned Future:

NEAR Protocol

263,323 views • 1 year ago

“We are Homo Techne”. I always ask my guests at the end of each episode of Pioneers of AI, what it means to be human in the age of #AI. I lovedddd Reid Hoffman’s answer: We are Homo Techne not Homo sapiens. As technology evolves, we as humans evolve with it. And we can do that with agency.
0:55

“We are Homo Techne”. I always ask my guests at the end of each episode of Pioneers of AI, what it means to be human in the age of #AI. I lovedddd Reid Hoffman’s answer: We are Homo Techne not Homo sapiens. As technology evolves, we as humans evolve with it. And we can do that with agency.

Dr. Rana el Kaliouby

15,142 views • 1 year ago

Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei on AI: We have the potential to cure diseases that have been incurable for thousands of years. To radically improve human health. To lift billions out of poverty. To create a better world for everyone. I’m concerned about the autonomous behavior of AI models. Their potential for misuse by individuals and governments. Their potential for economic displacement.
0:39

Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei on AI: We have the potential to cure diseases that have been incurable for thousands of years. To radically improve human health. To lift billions out of poverty. To create a better world for everyone. I’m concerned about the autonomous behavior of AI models. Their potential for misuse by individuals and governments. Their potential for economic displacement.

Open Source Intel

26,907 views • 5 months ago

The President of Anthropic said something at Stanford that no other AI CEO will say publicly. She talked about what AI is doing to the people who use it, why she walked out of OpenAI, and what skills will actually matter when AI can do most of what we do today. 1/ What AI safety actually means
1:58

The President of Anthropic said something at Stanford that no other AI CEO will say publicly. She talked about what AI is doing to the people who use it, why she walked out of OpenAI, and what skills will actually matter when AI can do most of what we do today. 1/ What AI safety actually means

Ihtesham Ali

150,207 views • 2 months ago

Dario Amodei says we're close to human-level AI, yet society doesn't see the tsunami coming Instead of preparing, people dismiss it as a trick of the light, while some push to accelerate blindly without realizing the risks "technical control has improved more than expected, but societal awareness has gotten worse"
1:06

Dario Amodei says we're close to human-level AI, yet society doesn't see the tsunami coming Instead of preparing, people dismiss it as a trick of the light, while some push to accelerate blindly without realizing the risks "technical control has improved more than expected, but societal awareness has gotten worse"

Haider.

54,859 views • 5 months ago

The man who built Nvidia from a Denny's booth into the world's first $5 trillion company just told us exactly why AI will never take our jobs. "AI has no possibility of doing all of what we do. However, depending on the jobs that we do, sometimes it could do 20% of our jobs, a thousand times better." "For some people, it might be able to do 50% of their job, a thousand times better." "Every one of us should apply AI to automate, to become an assistant, to help us with that either 20%, 40% or 50%." "People ask me, Jensen, is AI going to take your job? And I tell them absolutely not. The person who uses AI to automate that 20% or 50% is going to take your job." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:
1:22

The man who built Nvidia from a Denny's booth into the world's first $5 trillion company just told us exactly why AI will never take our jobs. "AI has no possibility of doing all of what we do. However, depending on the jobs that we do, sometimes it could do 20% of our jobs, a thousand times better." "For some people, it might be able to do 50% of their job, a thousand times better." "Every one of us should apply AI to automate, to become an assistant, to help us with that either 20%, 40% or 50%." "People ask me, Jensen, is AI going to take your job? And I tell them absolutely not. The person who uses AI to automate that 20% or 50% is going to take your job." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

Uncover AI

16,813 views • 2 months ago

At the #GlobalEcon debate, Daron Acemoglu said that to get the most out of AI we should use it to enhance human productivity rather than replace it. Watch the full debate here.
0:20

At the #GlobalEcon debate, Daron Acemoglu said that to get the most out of AI we should use it to enhance human productivity rather than replace it. Watch the full debate here.

IMF

118,606 views • 2 years ago