Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Remember? When Media asked- Why Bail not granted to Umar Khalid? Then CJI Chandrachud said- "Media creates an Atmosphere about a case, when a Judge looks at the merits of the case, it is very different from what Media portrays" Same is happening today. Rajdeeps and Arfas are crying... show more

Ankur Singh

158,115 subscribers

158,858 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education Health & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

India Is a Democracy in Name Only Umar Khalid has been in jail for 5 years WITHOUT any trial... When questioned, Former CJI Chandrachud says that Umar Khalid himself withdrew his bail application, HIDING the fact that the Judge was the Law Secretary to the Modi Govt in Gujarat.

India Is a Democracy in Name Only Umar Khalid has been in jail for 5 years WITHOUT any trial... When questioned, Former CJI Chandrachud says that Umar Khalid himself withdrew his bail application, HIDING the fact that the Judge was the Law Secretary to the Modi Govt in Gujarat.

House of the Dragon

85,471 views • 7 months ago

Former Supreme Court judge Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia speaks up on bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam. "I am disappointed with the judgement (bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam). Supreme Court has misinterpreted K.A. Najeeb's case. In the K.A. Najeeb case, Supreme Court granted him bail considering that there are over 200 witnesses and there is no possibility of completion of trial in the near future. So, the possibility of completion of trial has to be considered along with the period of incarceration. In this case, there are 900 witnesses. But this part has not been touched upon by the Supreme Court."

Former Supreme Court judge Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia speaks up on bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam. "I am disappointed with the judgement (bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam). Supreme Court has misinterpreted K.A. Najeeb's case. In the K.A. Najeeb case, Supreme Court granted him bail considering that there are over 200 witnesses and there is no possibility of completion of trial in the near future. So, the possibility of completion of trial has to be considered along with the period of incarceration. In this case, there are 900 witnesses. But this part has not been touched upon by the Supreme Court."

Kaushik Raj

104,707 views • 7 months ago

Ex-CJI Chandrachud takes on the liberal narrative on Umar Khalid's bail: "Lawyers keep seeking adjournments, then withdraw the bail application. Why the reluctance to argue? Either argue on day one or admit you don’t want to press the bail. Reality is very different from what liberals portray."

Ex-CJI Chandrachud takes on the liberal narrative on Umar Khalid's bail: "Lawyers keep seeking adjournments, then withdraw the bail application. Why the reluctance to argue? Either argue on day one or admit you don’t want to press the bail. Reality is very different from what liberals portray."

Political Kida

324,323 views • 11 months ago

India is a de facto Apartheid state. The judge granted bail to all three accused of attacking and dehumanizing Haji Ashraf Maniyar on the first day of the case. Umar Khalid is still in jail after four years.

India is a de facto Apartheid state. The judge granted bail to all three accused of attacking and dehumanizing Haji Ashraf Maniyar on the first day of the case. Umar Khalid is still in jail after four years.

Darab Farooqui

245,906 views • 1 year ago

Journalist asked this baby penguin about Umar Khalid bail rejection and he replied "Kuldeep Senger bail accepted why can't Umar Khalid" Senger bail is already rejected by the supreme court and not a single Hindu opposed it. I am a Hindu Rajput who opposed his bail(you can check my posts) This Thackeray family keeps embarrassing themselves

Journalist asked this baby penguin about Umar Khalid bail rejection and he replied "Kuldeep Senger bail accepted why can't Umar Khalid" Senger bail is already rejected by the supreme court and not a single Hindu opposed it. I am a Hindu Rajput who opposed his bail(you can check my posts) This Thackeray family keeps embarrassing themselves

Hindutva Knight

50,671 views • 7 months ago

#WATCH | Jaipur, Rajasthan: On Umar Khalid, former Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud says, "They've been inside for five years. I'm not criticising my court...you can impose conditions to ensure that the conditions for bail are not abused, but you must necessarily take into consideration that they have the right to an expeditious trial. And if an expeditious trial is not possible under present conditions, then bail should be the rule and not the exception." "... During my period of 24 months, we disposed of about 21,000 bail applications. There are cases which people don't think about when they criticise the Supreme Court for not granting bail in a particular case. Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera was about to be arrested. He was boarding a flight, I believe, at Guwahati, and he was about to be arrested. The paramilitary forces had surrounded his aircraft. His lawyer came and mentioned before us, soon after we assembled after lunch, that he's about to be arrested for having said something. The lawyer said that this is unforgivable. It's uncivil. It's not a case for arrest. And we protected him against arrest. That was a leader of the opposition who had said something which was uncivil. But everything uncivil is not something which is an offence under our law. And we protected them against this." "Example number two- Teesta Setalvad was denied bail by the Gujarat High Court. But they gave her time until 12 midnight on a particular day to surrender... The matter came up to me as Chief Justice of India when I was attending a music recital... I said, this is a case where she's entitled to be heard whether she gets bail or not is for that court to decide. We constituted a bench at 9 o'clock at night and she was granted bail..."

#WATCH | Jaipur, Rajasthan: On Umar Khalid, former Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud says, "They've been inside for five years. I'm not criticising my court...you can impose conditions to ensure that the conditions for bail are not abused, but you must necessarily take into consideration that they have the right to an expeditious trial. And if an expeditious trial is not possible under present conditions, then bail should be the rule and not the exception." "... During my period of 24 months, we disposed of about 21,000 bail applications. There are cases which people don't think about when they criticise the Supreme Court for not granting bail in a particular case. Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera was about to be arrested. He was boarding a flight, I believe, at Guwahati, and he was about to be arrested. The paramilitary forces had surrounded his aircraft. His lawyer came and mentioned before us, soon after we assembled after lunch, that he's about to be arrested for having said something. The lawyer said that this is unforgivable. It's uncivil. It's not a case for arrest. And we protected him against arrest. That was a leader of the opposition who had said something which was uncivil. But everything uncivil is not something which is an offence under our law. And we protected them against this." "Example number two- Teesta Setalvad was denied bail by the Gujarat High Court. But they gave her time until 12 midnight on a particular day to surrender... The matter came up to me as Chief Justice of India when I was attending a music recital... I said, this is a case where she's entitled to be heard whether she gets bail or not is for that court to decide. We constituted a bench at 9 o'clock at night and she was granted bail..."

ANI

523,933 views • 7 months ago

"Today, the perception is that, if the case goes before a particular bench, the result is going to be this" "You had the case of Umar Khalid asking for bail. Ultimately, the lawyer said that we want to withdraw the case because they knew what the result was going to be" - Justice MB Lokur, former SC judge.

"Today, the perception is that, if the case goes before a particular bench, the result is going to be this" "You had the case of Umar Khalid asking for bail. Ultimately, the lawyer said that we want to withdraw the case because they knew what the result was going to be" - Justice MB Lokur, former SC judge.

Live Law

245,870 views • 2 years ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Supreme Court refusing to grant bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in a case registered under UAPA, CPI-M leader Brinda Karat says, "We have seen the Supreme Court order. While we welcome the release of five of the other accused, it is most unfortunate that Umar Khalid has not been granted bail. He has been demonised by the government and the investigative agencies... He poses no danger to the state... To keep him incarcerated on utterly false charges is most unfortunate."

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Supreme Court refusing to grant bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in a case registered under UAPA, CPI-M leader Brinda Karat says, "We have seen the Supreme Court order. While we welcome the release of five of the other accused, it is most unfortunate that Umar Khalid has not been granted bail. He has been demonised by the government and the investigative agencies... He poses no danger to the state... To keep him incarcerated on utterly false charges is most unfortunate."

ANI

25,113 views • 7 months ago

Those who celebrated Col Purohit rotting in jail for 8 years without bail despite zero evidence are today outraging against a court that has denied bail to Umar Khalid because the 3000 page chargesheet against him for planning riots is damning. My views on ecosystem's hypocrisy:

Those who celebrated Col Purohit rotting in jail for 8 years without bail despite zero evidence are today outraging against a court that has denied bail to Umar Khalid because the 3000 page chargesheet against him for planning riots is damning. My views on ecosystem's hypocrisy:

Anand Ranganathan

211,218 views • 11 months ago

Those who celebrated Col Purohit rotting in jail for 8 years without bail despite zero evidence, are today outraging against courts denying bail to Sharjeel and Umar because the 3000 page chargesheet against them for planning riots is damning. My views on ecosystem's hypocrisy:

Those who celebrated Col Purohit rotting in jail for 8 years without bail despite zero evidence, are today outraging against courts denying bail to Sharjeel and Umar because the 3000 page chargesheet against them for planning riots is damning. My views on ecosystem's hypocrisy:

Anand Ranganathan

203,584 views • 9 months ago

“Even The Justice Crack That Is In Prison, Is a Very Nons€nse Person. The Judge Asked You In Court Who Was Going To Represent You, And You Decided To Drop Barrister Marshall Abubakar That Started The Case. It Shows You Followed Them To Plan The Nonsense. Then Barrister Marshall Discontinued The Case (Withdrew Bail) And You People Are Crying.”

“Even The Justice Crack That Is In Prison, Is a Very Nons€nse Person. The Judge Asked You In Court Who Was Going To Represent You, And You Decided To Drop Barrister Marshall Abubakar That Started The Case. It Shows You Followed Them To Plan The Nonsense. Then Barrister Marshall Discontinued The Case (Withdrew Bail) And You People Are Crying.”

Somto Okonkwo

416,618 views • 3 months ago

“What we find today is that a powerful person gets bail on an experimental basis, men like Umar Khalid are withering unheard." “A journalist spends time in jail for the crime of performing his duty, an old and ailing man unable to even sip his water is denied his basic medical aid and is made to suffer and die behind bars" "The question is not who is making them dance, the question is who is dancing and why?” Justice Rekha Sharma, ex-Delhi HC judge, on the judiciary.

“What we find today is that a powerful person gets bail on an experimental basis, men like Umar Khalid are withering unheard." “A journalist spends time in jail for the crime of performing his duty, an old and ailing man unable to even sip his water is denied his basic medical aid and is made to suffer and die behind bars" "The question is not who is making them dance, the question is who is dancing and why?” Justice Rekha Sharma, ex-Delhi HC judge, on the judiciary.

Live Law

171,583 views • 2 years ago

NEW: One of the migrants who allegedly beat NYPD officers in Times Square is now worried that *he* will be assaulted. Laughable. Venezuelan migrant Yorman Reveron's attorney told a judge that he has "received numerous death threats on social media in regards to this case" as he argued that Reveron should be freed without bail. The judge didn't buy it. "It’s clear that Mr. Reveron has been here one year and already had two interactions with the law: petit larcenies and assaultive behavior," Judge Ruth Pickholtz said. "And while he was out on supervised release, he continued in this case. So bail is appropriate at this time." Reveron is being held on $100,000 bail.

NEW: One of the migrants who allegedly beat NYPD officers in Times Square is now worried that he will be assaulted. Laughable. Venezuelan migrant Yorman Reveron's attorney told a judge that he has "received numerous death threats on social media in regards to this case" as he argued that Reveron should be freed without bail. The judge didn't buy it. "It’s clear that Mr. Reveron has been here one year and already had two interactions with the law: petit larcenies and assaultive behavior," Judge Ruth Pickholtz said. "And while he was out on supervised release, he continued in this case. So bail is appropriate at this time." Reveron is being held on $100,000 bail.

Collin Rugg

3,448,644 views • 2 years ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On sloganeering against PM Modi and Union HM Amit Shah in JNU campus yesterday, Congress leader Mumtaz Patel says, "We saw that Ram Rahim was granted parole again, and on the other hand, the bail applications of Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam were rejected. It seems that the scales of justice are tilted. We are not saying that the accused should not be punished. If they are guilty, if the charges against them are proven, then by all means, punish them. But why is due process not being followed, and why is there bias? ... What kind of justice is this? Shouldn't every citizen receive the same process? ... So big questions arise. I am not saying that the sloganeering that happened at JNU was right, but this is the anger of the people. It is evident that the government is biased, so questions will definitely be raised, and people's voices will also be raised."

#WATCH | Delhi: On sloganeering against PM Modi and Union HM Amit Shah in JNU campus yesterday, Congress leader Mumtaz Patel says, "We saw that Ram Rahim was granted parole again, and on the other hand, the bail applications of Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam were rejected. It seems that the scales of justice are tilted. We are not saying that the accused should not be punished. If they are guilty, if the charges against them are proven, then by all means, punish them. But why is due process not being followed, and why is there bias? ... What kind of justice is this? Shouldn't every citizen receive the same process? ... So big questions arise. I am not saying that the sloganeering that happened at JNU was right, but this is the anger of the people. It is evident that the government is biased, so questions will definitely be raised, and people's voices will also be raised."

ANI

89,785 views • 7 months ago

Even with two 'contempt of court' chasing me, I decide not to shut up because when a judge writes that he is not looking in to 'merits of the case' and grants bail to an accused on his whim, I think we all need to speak up. To save democracy, these compromised judges must be thrown out from judiciary and the legislature must ask them, "Who the fuck they think they are?" #ArvindKejriwal #दोगली_न्याय_व्यवस्था #SupremeCourt

Even with two 'contempt of court' chasing me, I decide not to shut up because when a judge writes that he is not looking in to 'merits of the case' and grants bail to an accused on his whim, I think we all need to speak up. To save democracy, these compromised judges must be thrown out from judiciary and the legislature must ask them, "Who the fuck they think they are?" #ArvindKejriwal #दोगली_न्याय_व्यवस्था #SupremeCourt

Ajeet Bharti

377,594 views • 2 years ago

I wonder why the mainstream media hid this story, lmao. In Texas, a white student is out on bail after stabbing a Mexican student to death on school grounds and is claiming self-defense. But when Karmelo claims self-defense and makes bail, it’s a problem.

I wonder why the mainstream media hid this story, lmao. In Texas, a white student is out on bail after stabbing a Mexican student to death on school grounds and is claiming self-defense. But when Karmelo claims self-defense and makes bail, it’s a problem.

Woodz 🇺🇸

643,912 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Seattle judge crisis continues — Meet Judge Bender of the King County Superior Court She has repeatedly released violent convicted criminals, including attempted murder suspects on low bail. Judge Bender took the time to disparage media during a killer's hearing, shaming reporters for informing the public about her record on releasing violent suspects. She showed empathy to the killer and the killer's family, claiming that she resonated with them over unfavorable media coverage. Judge Bender showed zero empathy for the victim's family. A few months ago, David Rose reported that Judge Bender set an attempted murder suspect's bail at $50,000 — which is just $5,000 to bail out. The suspect shot a grandmother multiple times at an ATM machine. Judge Bender doesn’t want the public to know about her record. Read:

🚨 Seattle judge crisis continues — Meet Judge Bender of the King County Superior Court She has repeatedly released violent convicted criminals, including attempted murder suspects on low bail. Judge Bender took the time to disparage media during a killer's hearing, shaming reporters for informing the public about her record on releasing violent suspects. She showed empathy to the killer and the killer's family, claiming that she resonated with them over unfavorable media coverage. Judge Bender showed zero empathy for the victim's family. A few months ago, David Rose reported that Judge Bender set an attempted murder suspect's bail at $50,000 — which is just $5,000 to bail out. The suspect shot a grandmother multiple times at an ATM machine. Judge Bender doesn’t want the public to know about her record. Read:

Katie Daviscourt 📸

241,484 views • 1 year ago