正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

"Today, the perception is that, if the case goes before a particular bench, the result is going to be this" "You had the case of Umar Khalid asking for bail. Ultimately, the lawyer said that we want to withdraw the case because they knew what the result was going... show more

Live Law

835,244 subscribers

245,870 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

Dr Gaurav Kumar 的头像

Dr Gaurav Kumar2 年前

Slap on judiciary

colourSaffron 的头像

colourSaffron2 年前

Why every other justice in his or her speech is asking for the release of Umar Khalid ? What makes him so special ? Can anyone make me understand ? Wasn’t he the part of Delhi riots where more than 100 people died and thousands lost their hard earned properties ?

Deshpande 的头像

Deshpande2 年前

@nikhilmargi You don’t get to pick judges who’ll preside over your case. Tomorrow murderer will cry injustice bcoz he didn’t get Judge of his liking. Stop joking. This doesn’t happen anywhere in the world. Well, maybe Russia.

keshav chaudhary 的头像

keshav chaudhary2 年前

Strange that all these retired judges are so sad for a jihadi. No wonder common citizens don’t get justice in India.

Jaswant Narwal 的头像

Jaswant Narwal2 年前

Judiciary must change this perception. ##umarkhalid's bail matter is a live example which represents hundreds of such cases where even sipper wasn't provided . My Lords dancing at the tune of Vishwaguru must know that their shelf life is limited too .

NY Traveler 的头像

NY Traveler2 年前

The BHC quashed Rhea Chakraborrty’s LOC because her lawyer was son of #CJIChandrachud and @CBIHeadquarters has been a complete FAILURE Accountability is with Centre. Period. #ArrestRheaChakraborty @narendramodi @AmitShah @BJP4India @PMOIndia @HMOIndia #JusticeForSushantSinghRajput #JusticeForDishaSalian

Fan of NCBN 的头像

Fan of NCBN2 年前

why does all the politically motivated cases go to only one single bench ?

Khalnayagan 的头像

Khalnayagan2 年前

Please take note of every judge who is talking of bail for Umar Khalid. These are the bad eggs of judiciary who have destroyed Indian judiciary for their ideological satisfaction. That's what made careers of people like sibbal, bhushan, dave, Jaisingh, singhvi, nanda etc

Limited Liberal! 的头像

Limited Liberal!2 年前

These people have been systematically pressuring judiciary for upcoming bail applications and important judgments. This ecosystem must be countered with equal passion

Dr. Govind Madhav 的头像

Dr. Govind Madhav2 年前

Was there no such perception during the tenure of J. Lokur or when he used to be on a bench?

相关视频

#WATCH | Jaipur, Rajasthan: On Umar Khalid, former Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud says, "They've been inside for five years. I'm not criticising my court...you can impose conditions to ensure that the conditions for bail are not abused, but you must necessarily take into consideration that they have the right to an expeditious trial. And if an expeditious trial is not possible under present conditions, then bail should be the rule and not the exception." "... During my period of 24 months, we disposed of about 21,000 bail applications. There are cases which people don't think about when they criticise the Supreme Court for not granting bail in a particular case. Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera was about to be arrested. He was boarding a flight, I believe, at Guwahati, and he was about to be arrested. The paramilitary forces had surrounded his aircraft. His lawyer came and mentioned before us, soon after we assembled after lunch, that he's about to be arrested for having said something. The lawyer said that this is unforgivable. It's uncivil. It's not a case for arrest. And we protected him against arrest. That was a leader of the opposition who had said something which was uncivil. But everything uncivil is not something which is an offence under our law. And we protected them against this." "Example number two- Teesta Setalvad was denied bail by the Gujarat High Court. But they gave her time until 12 midnight on a particular day to surrender... The matter came up to me as Chief Justice of India when I was attending a music recital... I said, this is a case where she's entitled to be heard whether she gets bail or not is for that court to decide. We constituted a bench at 9 o'clock at night and she was granted bail..."

#WATCH | Jaipur, Rajasthan: On Umar Khalid, former Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud says, "They've been inside for five years. I'm not criticising my court...you can impose conditions to ensure that the conditions for bail are not abused, but you must necessarily take into consideration that they have the right to an expeditious trial. And if an expeditious trial is not possible under present conditions, then bail should be the rule and not the exception." "... During my period of 24 months, we disposed of about 21,000 bail applications. There are cases which people don't think about when they criticise the Supreme Court for not granting bail in a particular case. Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera was about to be arrested. He was boarding a flight, I believe, at Guwahati, and he was about to be arrested. The paramilitary forces had surrounded his aircraft. His lawyer came and mentioned before us, soon after we assembled after lunch, that he's about to be arrested for having said something. The lawyer said that this is unforgivable. It's uncivil. It's not a case for arrest. And we protected him against arrest. That was a leader of the opposition who had said something which was uncivil. But everything uncivil is not something which is an offence under our law. And we protected them against this." "Example number two- Teesta Setalvad was denied bail by the Gujarat High Court. But they gave her time until 12 midnight on a particular day to surrender... The matter came up to me as Chief Justice of India when I was attending a music recital... I said, this is a case where she's entitled to be heard whether she gets bail or not is for that court to decide. We constituted a bench at 9 o'clock at night and she was granted bail..."

ANI

523,933 次观看 • 5 个月前

🇵🇰 EXCLUSIVE | IMRAN KHAN'S SISTER: CHIEF JUSTICE REFUSES TO HEAR IMRAN KHAN CASE ON MERIT Aleema Khanum "Imran Khan was charged with conspiracy relating to May 9th. The High Court, our judge, our lawyers went in, and we are laypersons. We really don’t have to understand everything; we are not legal people. But the courtroom was full, and we all saw how well Imran Khan’s lawyer, Salman Safdar, was handling the case. He basically laid out the case clearly. The prosecutor was making arguments that were embarrassing, even for the judge to hear. Imran Khan should have been granted bail at that time. But that court, under orders, dismissed the bail. As a result, our lawyers went to the Supreme Court. And yesterday morning, not as we would have expected, we really didn’t anticipate even this, the Supreme Court was so embarrassed by the merits of the case that the Chief Justice, before even hearing the bail application, said to both the prosecutor and our lawyer: 'I will not hear this case on merit.'" Source: PTI, Aleema Khanum

🇵🇰 EXCLUSIVE | IMRAN KHAN'S SISTER: CHIEF JUSTICE REFUSES TO HEAR IMRAN KHAN CASE ON MERIT Aleema Khanum "Imran Khan was charged with conspiracy relating to May 9th. The High Court, our judge, our lawyers went in, and we are laypersons. We really don’t have to understand everything; we are not legal people. But the courtroom was full, and we all saw how well Imran Khan’s lawyer, Salman Safdar, was handling the case. He basically laid out the case clearly. The prosecutor was making arguments that were embarrassing, even for the judge to hear. Imran Khan should have been granted bail at that time. But that court, under orders, dismissed the bail. As a result, our lawyers went to the Supreme Court. And yesterday morning, not as we would have expected, we really didn’t anticipate even this, the Supreme Court was so embarrassed by the merits of the case that the Chief Justice, before even hearing the bail application, said to both the prosecutor and our lawyer: 'I will not hear this case on merit.'" Source: PTI, Aleema Khanum

Mario Nawfal

131,012 次观看 • 10 个月前

I gave my lawyer the signal that I'm willing to discontinue the case, but since omoyele Sowore said he was the one that discontinued the case, I will continue with the case and Blord is going to face the law----- VDM

I gave my lawyer the signal that I'm willing to discontinue the case, but since omoyele Sowore said he was the one that discontinued the case, I will continue with the case and Blord is going to face the law----- VDM

Jojo

48,681 次观看 • 2 个月前

Remember? When Media asked- Why Bail not granted to Umar Khalid? Then CJI Chandrachud said- "Media creates an Atmosphere about a case, when a Judge looks at the merits of the case, it is very different from what Media portrays" Same is happening today. Rajdeeps and Arfas are crying on why bail not given to Umar and Sharjeel. But when Judge saw the evidence, he was satisfied that there's Prima Facie enough evidence against them, hence denied the Bail.

Remember? When Media asked- Why Bail not granted to Umar Khalid? Then CJI Chandrachud said- "Media creates an Atmosphere about a case, when a Judge looks at the merits of the case, it is very different from what Media portrays" Same is happening today. Rajdeeps and Arfas are crying on why bail not given to Umar and Sharjeel. But when Judge saw the evidence, he was satisfied that there's Prima Facie enough evidence against them, hence denied the Bail.

Ankur Singh

158,858 次观看 • 6 个月前

Former Supreme Court judge Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia speaks up on bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam. "I am disappointed with the judgement (bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam). Supreme Court has misinterpreted K.A. Najeeb's case. In the K.A. Najeeb case, Supreme Court granted him bail considering that there are over 200 witnesses and there is no possibility of completion of trial in the near future. So, the possibility of completion of trial has to be considered along with the period of incarceration. In this case, there are 900 witnesses. But this part has not been touched upon by the Supreme Court."

Former Supreme Court judge Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia speaks up on bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam. "I am disappointed with the judgement (bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam). Supreme Court has misinterpreted K.A. Najeeb's case. In the K.A. Najeeb case, Supreme Court granted him bail considering that there are over 200 witnesses and there is no possibility of completion of trial in the near future. So, the possibility of completion of trial has to be considered along with the period of incarceration. In this case, there are 900 witnesses. But this part has not been touched upon by the Supreme Court."

Kaushik Raj

104,707 次观看 • 5 个月前

Kennedy Agyapong(K.A) Contempt case 1. K.A. was ordered to answer contempt for insulting a judge. 2. He contended that the judge was biased. 3. The SC ordered the case to be allocated to a different judge. 4. From 2020 to 2025, nothing has been done. [This is the Judiciary]

Kennedy Agyapong(K.A) Contempt case 1. K.A. was ordered to answer contempt for insulting a judge. 2. He contended that the judge was biased. 3. The SC ordered the case to be allocated to a different judge. 4. From 2020 to 2025, nothing has been done. [This is the Judiciary]

GhLawTrends

42,444 次观看 • 1 年前

“Even The Justice Crack That Is In Prison, Is a Very Nons€nse Person. The Judge Asked You In Court Who Was Going To Represent You, And You Decided To Drop Barrister Marshall Abubakar That Started The Case. It Shows You Followed Them To Plan The Nonsense. Then Barrister Marshall Discontinued The Case (Withdrew Bail) And You People Are Crying.”

“Even The Justice Crack That Is In Prison, Is a Very Nons€nse Person. The Judge Asked You In Court Who Was Going To Represent You, And You Decided To Drop Barrister Marshall Abubakar That Started The Case. It Shows You Followed Them To Plan The Nonsense. Then Barrister Marshall Discontinued The Case (Withdrew Bail) And You People Are Crying.”

Somto Okonkwo

416,618 次观看 • 1 个月前

Tony Blair, speaking in 2020: "[Digital ID is] a natural evolution of the way that we're going to use technology... to transact daily in life." "People's disease status—for example, have they been tested? What is the result of that test, and... do they have the disease?" "Unless you're able to record some of this data... it's going to be difficult to go back to anything like a near normal." "There's always been a good case for introducing some form of digital ID, but I think that case is even more powerful today."

Tony Blair, speaking in 2020: "[Digital ID is] a natural evolution of the way that we're going to use technology... to transact daily in life." "People's disease status—for example, have they been tested? What is the result of that test, and... do they have the disease?" "Unless you're able to record some of this data... it's going to be difficult to go back to anything like a near normal." "There's always been a good case for introducing some form of digital ID, but I think that case is even more powerful today."

Wide Awake Media

13,977 次观看 • 9 个月前

JOHN CASE ON TINA PETER’S TRIAL “He said it was irrelevant and that it would confuse the jury if they knew that…the machines could potentially be rigged, and that Tina was performing a federal duty…” - John Case on the judge’s decision not to allow a case to be brought to the jury. Bannon’s WarRoom

JOHN CASE ON TINA PETER’S TRIAL “He said it was irrelevant and that it would confuse the jury if they knew that…the machines could potentially be rigged, and that Tina was performing a federal duty…” - John Case on the judge’s decision not to allow a case to be brought to the jury. Bannon’s WarRoom

Real America's Voice (RAV)

49,922 次观看 • 7 个月前

BREAKING.🚨 Judge Merchan has instructed the jury they do not need to have a *UNANIMOUS* verdict in order to convict former President Donald J. Trump. "One thing in particular that the judge said the jurors could do. He delivered what is being called really the pinnacle of all of this. There is no need to agree on what has occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices." "This means they could split 4-4-4 and the judge would still treat them unanimously. What does that mean?" "Outrageous. In a normal criminal case every statutory crime has what we call elements of the offense. Like in a bank robbery case you have to rob – it has to be a financial institution, you have to show intent," said former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy. "Those are the things the jury has to agree on unanimously that they were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Here what we’re doing is taking the element that actually makes this a felony, because remember falsification of records is normally a misdemeanor in New York. What makes it a felony is that you are concealing or committing another crime." "And here the judge is telling them they don’t have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony, makes it a four-year potential prison penalty rather than a year or less, but it is also what gets us into the courtroom." "If this had been a misdemeanor, the time to bring this case would have lapsed in 2019. The only reason they are still able to bring this case is because it’s a felony allegedly and yet now the judge is saying you know, you don’t have to agree on what the felony is." The jury has now gone to deliberations.

BREAKING.🚨 Judge Merchan has instructed the jury they do not need to have a UNANIMOUS verdict in order to convict former President Donald J. Trump. "One thing in particular that the judge said the jurors could do. He delivered what is being called really the pinnacle of all of this. There is no need to agree on what has occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices." "This means they could split 4-4-4 and the judge would still treat them unanimously. What does that mean?" "Outrageous. In a normal criminal case every statutory crime has what we call elements of the offense. Like in a bank robbery case you have to rob – it has to be a financial institution, you have to show intent," said former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy. "Those are the things the jury has to agree on unanimously that they were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Here what we’re doing is taking the element that actually makes this a felony, because remember falsification of records is normally a misdemeanor in New York. What makes it a felony is that you are concealing or committing another crime." "And here the judge is telling them they don’t have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony, makes it a four-year potential prison penalty rather than a year or less, but it is also what gets us into the courtroom." "If this had been a misdemeanor, the time to bring this case would have lapsed in 2019. The only reason they are still able to bring this case is because it’s a felony allegedly and yet now the judge is saying you know, you don’t have to agree on what the felony is." The jury has now gone to deliberations.

Kyle Becker

5,834,915 次观看 • 2 年前

This is the case for DeSantis 2028: “I’m going to be a change agent in Washington. I don’t want to be liked in Washington. I don’t care about the media, the bureaucrats, any of that. I want to return this government to We the People.”

This is the case for DeSantis 2028: “I’m going to be a change agent in Washington. I don’t want to be liked in Washington. I don’t care about the media, the bureaucrats, any of that. I want to return this government to We the People.”

Cryptid Politics

34,368 次观看 • 6 个月前

MacFarlane: Comey's arraignment is now set in that seashells by the seashore case. If the calendar holds up, the DOJ is going to have to show some of its cards in that case—they have filed so little, they've put nothing on the record in that case, wondering if it's going to implode between now and then. And all of this all of this seems to be rooted in based on the lie about the 2020 election.

MacFarlane: Comey's arraignment is now set in that seashells by the seashore case. If the calendar holds up, the DOJ is going to have to show some of its cards in that case—they have filed so little, they've put nothing on the record in that case, wondering if it's going to implode between now and then. And all of this all of this seems to be rooted in based on the lie about the 2020 election.

Acyn

162,677 次观看 • 1 个月前

A juror in the YSL case emailed the Judge that they’re going to be biased against the State no matter what because of how long they’ve been taking ‼️‼️

A juror in the YSL case emailed the Judge that they’re going to be biased against the State no matter what because of how long they’ve been taking ‼️‼️

THUGGERDAILY ひ

853,699 次观看 • 1 年前

VIDEO | On SC hearing in Waqf (Amendment) Act case, advocate Mujibur Rehman says, "The bench issued four points, they said that notice will be issued, they said that in Acts made by the Parliament, normally there is no stay given, but since this is an exceptional case, they said they will give interim relief. Court said that that they are dictating the interim order, the first relief was it was said that barring the ex-officio, all the members would be Muslims, if the collector goes for survey, he can't change the nature, and before going, he had to file application in court. Third was be it any property, be it Waqf by user or registered, the government will not be denotifying till we are hearing the matter. Tushar Mehta pleaded for time. Now the hearing will be done at 2 pm tomorrow. The court has understood the whole matter, sensitivity, and how the constitution was violated." #WaqfAmendmentAct #SupremeCourt

VIDEO | On SC hearing in Waqf (Amendment) Act case, advocate Mujibur Rehman says, "The bench issued four points, they said that notice will be issued, they said that in Acts made by the Parliament, normally there is no stay given, but since this is an exceptional case, they said they will give interim relief. Court said that that they are dictating the interim order, the first relief was it was said that barring the ex-officio, all the members would be Muslims, if the collector goes for survey, he can't change the nature, and before going, he had to file application in court. Third was be it any property, be it Waqf by user or registered, the government will not be denotifying till we are hearing the matter. Tushar Mehta pleaded for time. Now the hearing will be done at 2 pm tomorrow. The court has understood the whole matter, sensitivity, and how the constitution was violated." #WaqfAmendmentAct #SupremeCourt

Press Trust of India

287,525 次观看 • 1 年前

Justice Mohammed Garba Umar, the judge assigned to try the “Tinubu is a Criminal” case appeared to have a predetermined sentence in mind. When he ruled on the no-case submission against us, we asked him to recuse himself based on his conduct during the trial, including asking our lawyer to “kneel down” before him. He clearly wasn’t happy. He had not expected our stoic reaction.

Justice Mohammed Garba Umar, the judge assigned to try the “Tinubu is a Criminal” case appeared to have a predetermined sentence in mind. When he ruled on the no-case submission against us, we asked him to recuse himself based on his conduct during the trial, including asking our lawyer to “kneel down” before him. He clearly wasn’t happy. He had not expected our stoic reaction.

Omoyele Sowore

81,092 次观看 • 2 个月前

.Kari Lake: "I believe our case is the strongest election case the country has ever seen. And I do believe that eventually something's got to give, we will get a judge to do the right thing and it will open up securing our elections across the country. I think it's going to be my case that does that."

.Kari Lake: "I believe our case is the strongest election case the country has ever seen. And I do believe that eventually something's got to give, we will get a judge to do the right thing and it will open up securing our elections across the country. I think it's going to be my case that does that."

Kari Lake War Room

194,248 次观看 • 3 年前

What is going to be the end result of all this?

What is going to be the end result of all this?

Canada Proud

553,998 次观看 • 1 年前

“Nigerians, Do You Know That The Judge Justice Rita Ofili A. Handling Blord’s Case Faced 31 Counts Of Corruption, Perversion Of Justice, And Abuse Of Office For Financial Gain? This Is The Same Person VeryDarkMan Is Publicly Hyping Deceitfully Just To Influence The Case…And It May Not End Well. If I Were Blord, I Would Request The Judge To Recuse Herself From The Case.” ~ The CurrentTalk Reacts ⚖️

“Nigerians, Do You Know That The Judge Justice Rita Ofili A. Handling Blord’s Case Faced 31 Counts Of Corruption, Perversion Of Justice, And Abuse Of Office For Financial Gain? This Is The Same Person VeryDarkMan Is Publicly Hyping Deceitfully Just To Influence The Case…And It May Not End Well. If I Were Blord, I Would Request The Judge To Recuse Herself From The Case.” ~ The CurrentTalk Reacts ⚖️

Somto Okonkwo

45,672 次观看 • 2 个月前

A birth certificate proves citizenship in this country. Trump does not want that to be the case. If the Supreme Court rules in Trump’s favor in the birthright citizenship case, a U.S. passport will be the only way to prove citizenship. “If you don’t have [a U.S. passport], you’re not going to be able to register to vote,” Marc Elias said.

A birth certificate proves citizenship in this country. Trump does not want that to be the case. If the Supreme Court rules in Trump’s favor in the birthright citizenship case, a U.S. passport will be the only way to prove citizenship. “If you don’t have [a U.S. passport], you’re not going to be able to register to vote,” Marc Elias said.

Democracy Docket

124,913 次观看 • 1 个月前