正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Remote Work is Killing Career Growth for Young Professionals Chamath Palihapitiya explains: There are two types of mentoring 1) "Capital M Mentoring" "Capital M is where some person is assigned to you. They're going to imbue some magical phrase, or saying, or thing, and all of a sudden everything... is going to work out for you." "That form of Capital M Mentoring doesn't exist and has never worked for those that have tried it." 2) "small m mentoring" "The thing that's really productive is small m mentoring. And that happens when you model behaviors of really smart people, and really capable people, really ethical people." "And again, that happens because you're seeing them on a day to day basis, not just in a meeting, but in the gaps between meetings. They'll include you in certain things, or you'll have lunch with them." Chamath Palihapitiya sums it up: "All of these people that are looking for an accelerant in their career, they've robbed themselves of the most powerful accelerant possible, which is capable people to surround themselves with." "They are going to look back on these decisions, and they're going to regret them."show more

The All-In Podcast

572,365 subscribers

105,598 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

Adam Tannenbaum 的头像

Adam Tannenbaum1 年前

@chamath He’s not wrong, but also saying this from a villa on the Amalfi Coast lol

𝙺𝚒𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚕 𝙼𝚞𝚜𝚔 🤠 的头像

𝙺𝚒𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚕 𝙼𝚞𝚜𝚔 🤠1 年前

@chamath Agreed. None of my mentors knew they were my mentor. They were in my work circle and I learned constantly and in surprising ways

AllGreenCandles 的头像

AllGreenCandles1 年前

Completely disagree and really reflects a lot of not understanding (or remembering) what life was like in the beginning or even middle of a career. Founders, CEOs and the like make the SAME MISTAKE over and over again - and that’s thinking that people are as invested and care as much about YOUR business as you. They don’t. Most people don’t get joy out of building someone else’s dream/vision/product. Remote work offers freedom to be able to do a job you’re hired for, and have time to build your own thing. Not wasting months of your life in commute, but rather months of your life at the whiteboard ideating. That’s entirely separate from being able to spend tons of time with loved ones. Not gonna regret that.

J Rich Da Don (Rapper) 的头像

J Rich Da Don (Rapper)1 年前

@chamath Sitting outside in Italy with your shirt unbuttoned telling people they need to work in an office is 😙🤌

Dustin Burnham 的头像

Dustin Burnham1 年前

@chamath This resonates- my most powerful mentorships were little m, almost accidental and serendipitous

Bob_Harris 的头像

Bob_Harris1 年前

@chamath i love the Pod but these guys are full of shit... My productivity went up when i switched to WFH, never looked back. Is it for everyone? No... but they feel like an SV echo chamber on this one... BTW, as they do the pod on a weekday, from home or abroad... God, the hypocrisy

Johnny Utah 的头像

Johnny Utah1 年前

As someone in the Tech sales world, it is a rarity. Fact is mentoring rarely happens. Very few are willing to mentor in the self absorbed world we live in. The best career move I ever made accelerated my performance was hiring an executive coach. That would be my advice. Invest in yourself. Love the pod.

Pat Light 的头像

Pat Light1 年前

@chamath Sounds like a massive opportunity for anyone willing to show up to work. I’ve seen consistently in my company that I form stronger bonds and can help people move a long in their careers much easier when I see them consistently and thus they advance quicker.

Brent Fulfer 的头像

Brent Fulfer1 年前

Disagree and sounds like boomer talk. There are so many advantages working remote for your career > 9-5 grind in person. - Better leader of yourself. Working remote I’ve seen people elevate their careers faster by getting more done and being being more focused. Thus advancing faster. - Better Communicator. You can’t waste time and annoy your coworkers multiple times a day. Remote workers learn how to organize their days better and drive meeting with purpose. - Global mindset over local mindset. Working with teams around the globe people are better prepared to work with other cultures and work styles. In this era of work, having this skill set is incredibly important. Still love @theallinpod but they’re off here.

After Dinner 的头像

After Dinner1 年前

@chamath I am at my most successful working remotely. What Chamath says might be true for B and C players (though skeptical), but not for A players.

相关视频

$ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “You call them lunatics but the president just had this post where he says ‘we’re in discussions with a new and more reasonable regime’ – let me try to pin you down on that, who is this ‘new and more reasonable regime’? Is the United States in direct contact with them?” State Secretary Marco Rubio: “I’m not going to disclose to you who those people are, because it probably would get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran. Look, there’s some fractures going on there internally. And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything that’s happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that would be great. Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” “So we are always hopeful that that would exist over there. It’s unfortunate, the people of Iran are incredible people. The people who lead them, this clerical regime, that is the problem. And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future, that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world. But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability, that that is not the case. So we’re gonna test it.” George Stephanopoulos: “But the president said they are, is that the case or is it not? I’m just trying to get some clarity on that.” Marco Rubio: “So you have people that are saying some of the right things privately. Obviously, they’re not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you or put out there for the world doesn’t necessarily reflect what they’re saying in our conversations.”$

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “You call them lunatics but the president just had this post where he says ‘we’re in discussions with a new and more reasonable regime’ – let me try to pin you down on that, who is this ‘new and more reasonable regime’? Is the United States in direct contact with them?” State Secretary Marco Rubio: “I’m not going to disclose to you who those people are, because it probably would get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran. Look, there’s some fractures going on there internally. And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything that’s happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that would be great. Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” “So we are always hopeful that that would exist over there. It’s unfortunate, the people of Iran are incredible people. The people who lead them, this clerical regime, that is the problem. And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future, that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world. But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability, that that is not the case. So we’re gonna test it.” George Stephanopoulos: “But the president said they are, is that the case or is it not? I’m just trying to get some clarity on that.” Marco Rubio: “So you have people that are saying some of the right things privately. Obviously, they’re not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you or put out there for the world doesn’t necessarily reflect what they’re saying in our conversations.”

RedWave Press

419,579 次观看 • 4 个月前

Friedberg’s Ideal Immigration Test: Worker or Welfare? (Or Makers vs Takers) “I'm all about discerning immigration, not on the lines of some cultural definition, but really around that simple framing of are you going to get social support services or are you going to work? Going back to my makers vs takers point, if the primary motivation for an individual to come to this country is to be given benefits, to be given payments, to be given social services, to be given support, I think that that person should be denied immigration. If the primary motivation for the individual to come to the United States is to work to progress themselves, to become a maker, to create things, to work in such a way that they can generate income, save capital, buy things, advance their family's position because they are denied those rights due to the tyranny of the place that they're coming from, then they should be granted immigration status to come to this country and contribute. Because at the end of the day, what people may not like to hear, which is the truth, is that every single one of those people is actually net positive in growing our economy. And everyone thinks it's a zero-sum game with respect to jobs in the United States, and we shouldn't let people into this country that create jobs. But the fundamental truth is that anyone that is productive, meaning they create more value than they take in, grows the economy and more jobs get created, and overall, we all benefit from having those individuals here in this country. And by the way, if you are going to work, you are going to culturally assimilate, because that is what the United States is based on, which is productivity, work hard, create things, and have individual agency, have the ability to progress yourself in this world, in this society. And if you take advantage of that opportunity, you're going to love the American ideals that this country was founded upon.”

Friedberg’s Ideal Immigration Test: Worker or Welfare? (Or Makers vs Takers) “I'm all about discerning immigration, not on the lines of some cultural definition, but really around that simple framing of are you going to get social support services or are you going to work? Going back to my makers vs takers point, if the primary motivation for an individual to come to this country is to be given benefits, to be given payments, to be given social services, to be given support, I think that that person should be denied immigration. If the primary motivation for the individual to come to the United States is to work to progress themselves, to become a maker, to create things, to work in such a way that they can generate income, save capital, buy things, advance their family's position because they are denied those rights due to the tyranny of the place that they're coming from, then they should be granted immigration status to come to this country and contribute. Because at the end of the day, what people may not like to hear, which is the truth, is that every single one of those people is actually net positive in growing our economy. And everyone thinks it's a zero-sum game with respect to jobs in the United States, and we shouldn't let people into this country that create jobs. But the fundamental truth is that anyone that is productive, meaning they create more value than they take in, grows the economy and more jobs get created, and overall, we all benefit from having those individuals here in this country. And by the way, if you are going to work, you are going to culturally assimilate, because that is what the United States is based on, which is productivity, work hard, create things, and have individual agency, have the ability to progress yourself in this world, in this society. And if you take advantage of that opportunity, you're going to love the American ideals that this country was founded upon.”

The All-In Podcast

54,797 次观看 • 1 个月前

Elon Musk: If you are creating a company or joining a company the most important thing is to attract great people "If you are creating a company or joining a company the most important thing is to attract great people, so either be with or join a group that's amazing that you really respect, or if you have building a company you have to gather great people I mean all the company is a group of people that have gathered together to create a product or service and so depending upon how talented and hardworking that group is, and the degree to which they're focused, cohesively, and in a good direction, that will determine the success of the company Do everything you can to gather great people, if you are creating a company"

Elon Musk: If you are creating a company or joining a company the most important thing is to attract great people "If you are creating a company or joining a company the most important thing is to attract great people, so either be with or join a group that's amazing that you really respect, or if you have building a company you have to gather great people I mean all the company is a group of people that have gathered together to create a product or service and so depending upon how talented and hardworking that group is, and the degree to which they're focused, cohesively, and in a good direction, that will determine the success of the company Do everything you can to gather great people, if you are creating a company"

SMX 🇺🇸

12,251 次观看 • 4 个月前

Journalist: "What do you think of Hamas re-arming, instituting themselves as a Palestinian police force, shooting rivals? What is your message to Hamas?" President Trump: "We are (under)standing because they do want to stop the problems. And they've been open about it, and we gave them approval for a period of time. You have to understand, they've lost probably 60,000 people. That's a lot of retribution. They've lost 60,000 people. And the ones that are living right now were, in many cases, very young when this all started. And we are having them watch that there's not going to be big crime or some of the problems that you have when you have areas like this that have been literally demolished. You know, you have two million people, and probably it'll be less than that, but you have close to two million people going back to buildings that have been demolished. And a lot of bad things can happen. So we want it to be safe. I think it's going to be fine."

Journalist: "What do you think of Hamas re-arming, instituting themselves as a Palestinian police force, shooting rivals? What is your message to Hamas?" President Trump: "We are (under)standing because they do want to stop the problems. And they've been open about it, and we gave them approval for a period of time. You have to understand, they've lost probably 60,000 people. That's a lot of retribution. They've lost 60,000 people. And the ones that are living right now were, in many cases, very young when this all started. And we are having them watch that there's not going to be big crime or some of the problems that you have when you have areas like this that have been literally demolished. You know, you have two million people, and probably it'll be less than that, but you have close to two million people going back to buildings that have been demolished. And a lot of bad things can happen. So we want it to be safe. I think it's going to be fine."

أبو عمّار

45,226 次观看 • 9 个月前

Trump: You have some vaccines that are so amazing. The polio vaccine I think is amazing. A lot of people think that covid is amazing. You know. I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated. You have vaccines that work. Just pure and simple they work. They're not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used otherwise some people are going to catch it and they endanger other people. And when you don't have controversy at all, I think people should take them.

Trump: You have some vaccines that are so amazing. The polio vaccine I think is amazing. A lot of people think that covid is amazing. You know. I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated. You have vaccines that work. Just pure and simple they work. They're not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used otherwise some people are going to catch it and they endanger other people. And when you don't have controversy at all, I think people should take them.

Acyn

718,768 次观看 • 11 个月前

.Anish Acharya says the future of AI isn’t one model to rule them all—and explains why platforms that integrate multiple models will benefit the most: "I think we're going to need and rely on all of the models." "It's sort of like if you have a team of people... if you have five people, they could all do a basic set of things pretty capably." "But then they all have their specializations. Maybe one of them is really good at closing a customer who doesn't want to sign the deal, and one of them is really good at culture and getting the best out of the team." "There are some areas in which they are going to build apps, and that will be a threat to app companies. But there are many areas in which app companies are advantaged. Cursor and Krea are great examples of this—products where you benefit from being multi-model." "When you actually use a creative tool, you don't want to just use Nano Banana, you want to have access to OpenAI, Nano Banana, Kling—all of them—Qwen, you name it. So using a single interface to access all the models is powerful." Anish Acharya on BILLIONS with Guillaume Moubeche

.Anish Acharya says the future of AI isn’t one model to rule them all—and explains why platforms that integrate multiple models will benefit the most: "I think we're going to need and rely on all of the models." "It's sort of like if you have a team of people... if you have five people, they could all do a basic set of things pretty capably." "But then they all have their specializations. Maybe one of them is really good at closing a customer who doesn't want to sign the deal, and one of them is really good at culture and getting the best out of the team." "There are some areas in which they are going to build apps, and that will be a threat to app companies. But there are many areas in which app companies are advantaged. Cursor and Krea are great examples of this—products where you benefit from being multi-model." "When you actually use a creative tool, you don't want to just use Nano Banana, you want to have access to OpenAI, Nano Banana, Kling—all of them—Qwen, you name it. So using a single interface to access all the models is powerful." Anish Acharya on BILLIONS with Guillaume Moubeche

a16z

33,241 次观看 • 4 个月前

Head coach Dave Aranda's full quote on what he would say to frustrated fans: "We’ve got a bunch of really, really good people in the program that are doing everything they can to get wins and to make it an entertaining product for the fans. It means so much when there are fans there and there’s a home-field environment. I look at the guys that are on our team right now, who have been through so much and are such quality football — really good football players — more than that, but just quality people. They’re the type of people that maybe some of the people who are talking about them knew them better, would be all for them, and support them no matter what. I think for them, to have it where their work is being rewarded with people that got their back in a critical game would be cool, but I understand what you’re saying. I can definitely see that."

Head coach Dave Aranda's full quote on what he would say to frustrated fans: "We’ve got a bunch of really, really good people in the program that are doing everything they can to get wins and to make it an entertaining product for the fans. It means so much when there are fans there and there’s a home-field environment. I look at the guys that are on our team right now, who have been through so much and are such quality football — really good football players — more than that, but just quality people. They’re the type of people that maybe some of the people who are talking about them knew them better, would be all for them, and support them no matter what. I think for them, to have it where their work is being rewarded with people that got their back in a critical game would be cool, but I understand what you’re saying. I can definitely see that."

Baylor Bears on SicEm365

13,292 次观看 • 9 个月前

SORKIN: “Students are deeply fearful and worried about whether they're going to have a job.” BEZOS: “Yeah, and the reason they're afraid of that is because all these smart people keep saying that … These people are wrong!”

SORKIN: “Students are deeply fearful and worried about whether they're going to have a job.” BEZOS: “Yeah, and the reason they're afraid of that is because all these smart people keep saying that … These people are wrong!”

Chief Nerd

290,557 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump is ROASTING the Biden administration while taking a victory lap on historic peace in the Middle East "We're going to get a lot of people joining the Abraham Accords...you had the Biden administration, which is the WORST administration in the history of our country." "And obviously, they did NOTHING on that, and anything else." "A lot of people, even today, they're talking about all joining up. So, so many people have talked to me about that, and it's going to be a great tribute to really the United States." "I mean, the United States has worked very hard in the Middle East, so it would be a tribute to us, and to Jared [Kushner], and to Steve [Witkoff], and to all of the people, Marco - all of the people that have worked so hard on that." "And it really is going to bring - it's going to guarantee that it all stays together." It's insane to think about. They really did NOTHING for peace across 4 whole years. Then compare it to the last 9 months.

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump is ROASTING the Biden administration while taking a victory lap on historic peace in the Middle East "We're going to get a lot of people joining the Abraham Accords...you had the Biden administration, which is the WORST administration in the history of our country." "And obviously, they did NOTHING on that, and anything else." "A lot of people, even today, they're talking about all joining up. So, so many people have talked to me about that, and it's going to be a great tribute to really the United States." "I mean, the United States has worked very hard in the Middle East, so it would be a tribute to us, and to Jared [Kushner], and to Steve [Witkoff], and to all of the people, Marco - all of the people that have worked so hard on that." "And it really is going to bring - it's going to guarantee that it all stays together." It's insane to think about. They really did NOTHING for peace across 4 whole years. Then compare it to the last 9 months.

Eric Daugherty

46,906 次观看 • 9 个月前

Mark Zuckerberg: "I'd rather hire someone with raw intelligence and no experience than a 10-year veteran" "The two most important things I look for, number one is just raw intelligence." Zuckerberg explains why: "You can hire someone who is a software engineer and has been doing it for 10 years. If they've been doing it for 10 years, that's probably what they're doing for their life. And that's cool. There are things that person can do. They're definitely useful in an organization." But here's the tradeoff: "If you find someone whose raw intelligence exceeds theirs but has way less experience, they can probably adapt and learn way quicker. Within a very short amount of time, they'll be able to do a lot of things that the experienced person may never be able to do." The second thing he looks for: "Alignment with what we're trying to do. People can be really smart or have skills that are directly applicable. But if they don't really believe in it, they're not going to work hard. Even if they're a smart guy who doesn't have the relevant experience, if they don't care enough, they're not going to develop the relevant experience in order to succeed." On who he's actually hired: "The best people I've hired so far have been people who didn't really have that much engineering experience. I hired a couple of electrical engineers out of Stanford as new programming staff. They had very little programming experience going in. But just really smart. Really willing to go at it." He gives an example: "The guy who built Photos was one of those guys. If you're willing to just go and do whatever it takes to get it out, you're probably more valuable than someone who's just a career software engineer."

Mark Zuckerberg: "I'd rather hire someone with raw intelligence and no experience than a 10-year veteran" "The two most important things I look for, number one is just raw intelligence." Zuckerberg explains why: "You can hire someone who is a software engineer and has been doing it for 10 years. If they've been doing it for 10 years, that's probably what they're doing for their life. And that's cool. There are things that person can do. They're definitely useful in an organization." But here's the tradeoff: "If you find someone whose raw intelligence exceeds theirs but has way less experience, they can probably adapt and learn way quicker. Within a very short amount of time, they'll be able to do a lot of things that the experienced person may never be able to do." The second thing he looks for: "Alignment with what we're trying to do. People can be really smart or have skills that are directly applicable. But if they don't really believe in it, they're not going to work hard. Even if they're a smart guy who doesn't have the relevant experience, if they don't care enough, they're not going to develop the relevant experience in order to succeed." On who he's actually hired: "The best people I've hired so far have been people who didn't really have that much engineering experience. I hired a couple of electrical engineers out of Stanford as new programming staff. They had very little programming experience going in. But just really smart. Really willing to go at it." He gives an example: "The guy who built Photos was one of those guys. If you're willing to just go and do whatever it takes to get it out, you're probably more valuable than someone who's just a career software engineer."

Jaynit

401,845 次观看 • 3 个月前

Angelina Jolie Has Finally Woken Up To The Fact The United Nations & Governments Are Run By Heartless Criminals There’s No Accountability For Crimes “If There’s A Business Interest Involved” “That is the biggest that is the most disheartening thing of I think we we or I thought at least even 20 years ago when I started to work internationally that there was this I in my head, some weird idea of good guys. You know? Some idea of those whether it be certain countries or certain people's maybe it was this holdover from World War 2 and this thought that this was, like so that the lines were clear and that there was going to be these human rights goals laid out and that there would be things stood up for, and that if these things weren't done, there would be pushback, and these were the and I really thought that's what it was. I even thought that's what the United Nations was… And I thought, okay. There's a there's some lines in the sand. There's some understanding. We're gonna grow and fight for improvements in these areas. And and to watch to watch and understand more and more how it's just simply that's not what it is. That's not the world. The world is not these are human rights. It is these are human rights sometimes for these people, maybe sometimes for these people, never for these people. Yeah. It's food aid, 6% for these people, 50% for these people, it's justice for these people, but not these people. Accountability for this crime, but not that crime if there's business interest. And this is truly the ugly state of of so much of the world that we are just becoming more and more aware of for just about every I mean, I don't know any countries that are are clean of it and, um, and willing to hold a line really consistently hand on behalf of the of human rights and laws”

Angelina Jolie Has Finally Woken Up To The Fact The United Nations & Governments Are Run By Heartless Criminals There’s No Accountability For Crimes “If There’s A Business Interest Involved” “That is the biggest that is the most disheartening thing of I think we we or I thought at least even 20 years ago when I started to work internationally that there was this I in my head, some weird idea of good guys. You know? Some idea of those whether it be certain countries or certain people's maybe it was this holdover from World War 2 and this thought that this was, like so that the lines were clear and that there was going to be these human rights goals laid out and that there would be things stood up for, and that if these things weren't done, there would be pushback, and these were the and I really thought that's what it was. I even thought that's what the United Nations was… And I thought, okay. There's a there's some lines in the sand. There's some understanding. We're gonna grow and fight for improvements in these areas. And and to watch to watch and understand more and more how it's just simply that's not what it is. That's not the world. The world is not these are human rights. It is these are human rights sometimes for these people, maybe sometimes for these people, never for these people. Yeah. It's food aid, 6% for these people, 50% for these people, it's justice for these people, but not these people. Accountability for this crime, but not that crime if there's business interest. And this is truly the ugly state of of so much of the world that we are just becoming more and more aware of for just about every I mean, I don't know any countries that are are clean of it and, um, and willing to hold a line really consistently hand on behalf of the of human rights and laws”

Wall Street Apes

658,860 次观看 • 2 年前

Rep. Clark: Trump is shutting the door on the American people who already know they have a health care system that doesn't work for them. They are already seeing dramatic increases in prices due to tariffs. They are so worried that their small businesses are going to not be able to keep their doors open. These are the very real things, and the response from Trump is 'we're not going to work with you'

Rep. Clark: Trump is shutting the door on the American people who already know they have a health care system that doesn't work for them. They are already seeing dramatic increases in prices due to tariffs. They are so worried that their small businesses are going to not be able to keep their doors open. These are the very real things, and the response from Trump is 'we're not going to work with you'

FactPost

16,641 次观看 • 10 个月前

Chamath: Google is a compounding machine and can win the entire AI stack Chamath Palihapitiya reacts to $GOOG dropping ~7% after raising its capex forecast to ~$200B for 2026: “Do you know what Google's 25-year average return on invested capital has been since going public? 32%. When you are a machine, and a group of people, and a business model that compounds money at 32% over a 20-year average, you give these guys the benefit of the doubt. These are not people that are flying fast and loose, they are methodically investing in their edge. They are going to get massively rewarded. Google has an incredible search experience. They seem to be navigating this transition to use AI. They have an incredible cloud business, and they have an incredible silicon business. The best thing that can happen to them is 500 different models proliferate, and they support all of them. Because they will make so much money at the silicon layer, they'll make so much money as the cloud provider, and they'll find a bunch of apps, including YouTube and other things, to make money from because you use the AI to target ads better or to help make better content, etc., etc. Jason: “Fragmentation is good for them.” Chamath: “Oh, it's great for them. It's a compounding machine.”

Chamath: Google is a compounding machine and can win the entire AI stack Chamath Palihapitiya reacts to $GOOG dropping ~7% after raising its capex forecast to ~$200B for 2026: “Do you know what Google's 25-year average return on invested capital has been since going public? 32%. When you are a machine, and a group of people, and a business model that compounds money at 32% over a 20-year average, you give these guys the benefit of the doubt. These are not people that are flying fast and loose, they are methodically investing in their edge. They are going to get massively rewarded. Google has an incredible search experience. They seem to be navigating this transition to use AI. They have an incredible cloud business, and they have an incredible silicon business. The best thing that can happen to them is 500 different models proliferate, and they support all of them. Because they will make so much money at the silicon layer, they'll make so much money as the cloud provider, and they'll find a bunch of apps, including YouTube and other things, to make money from because you use the AI to target ads better or to help make better content, etc., etc. Jason: “Fragmentation is good for them.” Chamath: “Oh, it's great for them. It's a compounding machine.”

The All-In Podcast

108,550 次观看 • 8 天前

Villa: Small business owners are struggling because people are not going to their small businesses. The community is not going out to shop. We are seeing people who are still fearful of sending their children to school or going to pick them up. They’re relying on each other, a network that they’ve created to help with that. We are seeing grocery stores empty and volunteers having to make food runs for people in the community.

Villa: Small business owners are struggling because people are not going to their small businesses. The community is not going out to shop. We are seeing people who are still fearful of sending their children to school or going to pick them up. They’re relying on each other, a network that they’ve created to help with that. We are seeing grocery stores empty and volunteers having to make food runs for people in the community.

Acyn

57,811 次观看 • 10 个月前

Stephen Colbert: “A lot of people, conspiratorially minded people out there, like to think that some of the trouble the United States has is because of what they call the ‘Deep State.’ As a former spy, is there a Deep State?” Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI): “This idea that there's some network of people that are running the world it just — doesn’t really match reality. And these people, in the dead of night, are doing things to protect this country and make sure things don’t blow up here. And for me, you know, the way that Trump is going after them is just particularly — first of all, it’s nasty. Second of all, it's completely counter to our interests to be demoralizing the people that are protecting us.”

Stephen Colbert: “A lot of people, conspiratorially minded people out there, like to think that some of the trouble the United States has is because of what they call the ‘Deep State.’ As a former spy, is there a Deep State?” Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI): “This idea that there's some network of people that are running the world it just — doesn’t really match reality. And these people, in the dead of night, are doing things to protect this country and make sure things don’t blow up here. And for me, you know, the way that Trump is going after them is just particularly — first of all, it’s nasty. Second of all, it's completely counter to our interests to be demoralizing the people that are protecting us.”

RedWave Press

537,487 次观看 • 1 年前

Sam Altman: “Most people give up on things way too early” “Knowing when to quit and knowing when to give up on something, there’s no perfect answer to that. It’s really challenging to even get that approximately correct. But I think most people give up on things way too early.” Sam continues: “The mistake that most people make — particularly young entrepreneurs — is they try something, it does not immediately work, and after seven weeks, they say, ‘I tried this thing and it’s just not meant to be.’… The satirical version of this are people who are 23 and have started 14 startups because they give up on everyone before it could ever possibly be successful. These things are really hard. They take a really long time. There are a lot of critics. There are a lot of people who say: your thing sucks; it’s going to fail; it’s really stupid.” There’s also what Y Combinator calls “The Trough of Sorrow” where, as Sam describes, “no one even decides to say it sucks because no one cares at all. And that is at least as demotivating.” But this doesn’t necessarily mean it won’t work. Sam explains: “Most of the founders that I have spent a lot of time with that have gone on to be super successful spent a very long time on their idea when a lot of other people would have given up. Either people said it sucks, or people said nothing about it at all. And a framework that I have for when to give up versus when to keep working is that it should be an internal, rather than an external, decision. If people aren’t using it or people are saying it’s bad, that alone is not a reason to give up. You want to pay some attention to that — they might be right. But the best entrepreneurs I know make an internal decision about when to give up or when to keep working on something. It’s basically: when you have run out of ideas, and something is not working, then it is a good time to stop.” Video source: Y Combinator (2016)

Sam Altman: “Most people give up on things way too early” “Knowing when to quit and knowing when to give up on something, there’s no perfect answer to that. It’s really challenging to even get that approximately correct. But I think most people give up on things way too early.” Sam continues: “The mistake that most people make — particularly young entrepreneurs — is they try something, it does not immediately work, and after seven weeks, they say, ‘I tried this thing and it’s just not meant to be.’… The satirical version of this are people who are 23 and have started 14 startups because they give up on everyone before it could ever possibly be successful. These things are really hard. They take a really long time. There are a lot of critics. There are a lot of people who say: your thing sucks; it’s going to fail; it’s really stupid.” There’s also what Y Combinator calls “The Trough of Sorrow” where, as Sam describes, “no one even decides to say it sucks because no one cares at all. And that is at least as demotivating.” But this doesn’t necessarily mean it won’t work. Sam explains: “Most of the founders that I have spent a lot of time with that have gone on to be super successful spent a very long time on their idea when a lot of other people would have given up. Either people said it sucks, or people said nothing about it at all. And a framework that I have for when to give up versus when to keep working is that it should be an internal, rather than an external, decision. If people aren’t using it or people are saying it’s bad, that alone is not a reason to give up. You want to pay some attention to that — they might be right. But the best entrepreneurs I know make an internal decision about when to give up or when to keep working on something. It’s basically: when you have run out of ideas, and something is not working, then it is a good time to stop.” Video source: Y Combinator (2016)

Startup Archive

31,721 次观看 • 1 年前

Seattle Seahawks HC Mike Macdonald - Scouting Pass Protections - "You're really just trying to get what their rule is to start when they leave the huddle. What do I want to present them with because how am I going to anticipate how they're going to react based on the looks they've gotten in the past, the looks we've given them and then we can go to work." - "You definitely have to account for 7 man protection. You'll find the more you blitz, the more 7 man you're going to see. - "Those are decisions you have to make when you're building your plan. We know that we're getting this protection when they give us this formation and we got a sweet pressure that will hit them to do it, there is a spot and a time and place for that." -"There is a time & place for saying I'm not sure when they're going to go to 7 man, even if we're in 5 man rush, our dudes can get there. We're going to at least have a couple 1 on 1s that we can win. Let's not overdo it with all these checks and all this other BS so our guys can just go out there and execute the call, there is a space for that as well." -"And then there is also a space for hey we're brining two off the edge right here, they're going to have this picked up, why even run against the wall, let's check out of it and go to rush and coverage and double 2/3 guys running a route. Those are the questions you want to ask yourself throughout the week and a lot of times it comes down to whether or not you can anticipate them being in that particular thing."

Seattle Seahawks HC Mike Macdonald - Scouting Pass Protections - "You're really just trying to get what their rule is to start when they leave the huddle. What do I want to present them with because how am I going to anticipate how they're going to react based on the looks they've gotten in the past, the looks we've given them and then we can go to work." - "You definitely have to account for 7 man protection. You'll find the more you blitz, the more 7 man you're going to see. - "Those are decisions you have to make when you're building your plan. We know that we're getting this protection when they give us this formation and we got a sweet pressure that will hit them to do it, there is a spot and a time and place for that." -"There is a time & place for saying I'm not sure when they're going to go to 7 man, even if we're in 5 man rush, our dudes can get there. We're going to at least have a couple 1 on 1s that we can win. Let's not overdo it with all these checks and all this other BS so our guys can just go out there and execute the call, there is a space for that as well." -"And then there is also a space for hey we're brining two off the edge right here, they're going to have this picked up, why even run against the wall, let's check out of it and go to rush and coverage and double 2/3 guys running a route. Those are the questions you want to ask yourself throughout the week and a lot of times it comes down to whether or not you can anticipate them being in that particular thing."

James Light

67,656 次观看 • 5 个月前

Seattle Seahawks HC Mike Macdonald - Scouting Pass Protections - "You're really just trying to get what their rule is to start when they leave the huddle. What do I want to present them with because how am I going to anticipate how they're going to react based on the looks they've gotten in the past, the looks we've given them and then we can go to work." - "You definitely have to account for 7 man protection. You'll find the more you blitz, the more 7 man you're going to see." - "Those are decisions you have to make when you're building your plan. We know that we're getting this protection when they give us this formation and we got a sweet pressure that will hit them to do it, there is a spot and a time and place for that." - "There is a time & place for saying I'm not sure when they're going to go to 7 man, even if we're in 5 man rush, our dudes can get there. We're going to at least have a couple 1 on 1s that we can win. Let's not overdo it with all these checks and all this other BS so our guys can just go out there and execute the call, there is a space for that as well." - "And then there is also a space for hey we're brining two off the edge right here, they're going to have this picked up, why even run against the wall, let's check out of it and go to rush and coverage and double 2/3 guys running a route. Those are the questions you want to ask yourself throughout the week and a lot of times it comes down to whether or not you can anticipate them being in that particular thing."

Seattle Seahawks HC Mike Macdonald - Scouting Pass Protections - "You're really just trying to get what their rule is to start when they leave the huddle. What do I want to present them with because how am I going to anticipate how they're going to react based on the looks they've gotten in the past, the looks we've given them and then we can go to work." - "You definitely have to account for 7 man protection. You'll find the more you blitz, the more 7 man you're going to see." - "Those are decisions you have to make when you're building your plan. We know that we're getting this protection when they give us this formation and we got a sweet pressure that will hit them to do it, there is a spot and a time and place for that." - "There is a time & place for saying I'm not sure when they're going to go to 7 man, even if we're in 5 man rush, our dudes can get there. We're going to at least have a couple 1 on 1s that we can win. Let's not overdo it with all these checks and all this other BS so our guys can just go out there and execute the call, there is a space for that as well." - "And then there is also a space for hey we're brining two off the edge right here, they're going to have this picked up, why even run against the wall, let's check out of it and go to rush and coverage and double 2/3 guys running a route. Those are the questions you want to ask yourself throughout the week and a lot of times it comes down to whether or not you can anticipate them being in that particular thing."

James Light

68,135 次观看 • 28 天前