Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Remote Work is Killing Career Growth for Young Professionals Chamath Palihapitiya explains: There are two types of mentoring 1) "Capital M Mentoring" "Capital M is where some person is assigned to you. They're going to imbue some magical phrase, or saying, or thing, and all of a sudden everything... is going to work out for you." "That form of Capital M Mentoring doesn't exist and has never worked for those that have tried it." 2) "small m mentoring" "The thing that's really productive is small m mentoring. And that happens when you model behaviors of really smart people, and really capable people, really ethical people." "And again, that happens because you're seeing them on a day to day basis, not just in a meeting, but in the gaps between meetings. They'll include you in certain things, or you'll have lunch with them." Chamath Palihapitiya sums it up: "All of these people that are looking for an accelerant in their career, they've robbed themselves of the most powerful accelerant possible, which is capable people to surround themselves with." "They are going to look back on these decisions, and they're going to regret them."show more

The All-In Podcast

572,365 subscribers

105,598 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Bildung Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Adam Tannenbaum

Adam Tannenbaumvor 2 Jahren

@chamath He’s not wrong, but also saying this from a villa on the Amalfi Coast lol

Profilbild von 𝙺𝚒𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚕 𝙼𝚞𝚜𝚔 🤠

𝙺𝚒𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚕 𝙼𝚞𝚜𝚔 🤠vor 2 Jahren

@chamath Agreed. None of my mentors knew they were my mentor. They were in my work circle and I learned constantly and in surprising ways

Profilbild von AllGreenCandles

AllGreenCandlesvor 2 Jahren

Completely disagree and really reflects a lot of not understanding (or remembering) what life was like in the beginning or even middle of a career. Founders, CEOs and the like make the SAME MISTAKE over and over again - and that’s thinking that people are as invested and care as much about YOUR business as you. They don’t. Most people don’t get joy out of building someone else’s dream/vision/product. Remote work offers freedom to be able to do a job you’re hired for, and have time to build your own thing. Not wasting months of your life in commute, but rather months of your life at the whiteboard ideating. That’s entirely separate from being able to spend tons of time with loved ones. Not gonna regret that.

Profilbild von J Rich Da Don (Rapper)

J Rich Da Don (Rapper)vor 2 Jahren

@chamath Sitting outside in Italy with your shirt unbuttoned telling people they need to work in an office is 😙🤌

Profilbild von Dustin Burnham

Dustin Burnhamvor 2 Jahren

@chamath This resonates- my most powerful mentorships were little m, almost accidental and serendipitous

Profilbild von Bob_Harris

Bob_Harrisvor 2 Jahren

@chamath i love the Pod but these guys are full of shit... My productivity went up when i switched to WFH, never looked back. Is it for everyone? No... but they feel like an SV echo chamber on this one... BTW, as they do the pod on a weekday, from home or abroad... God, the hypocrisy

Profilbild von Johnny Utah

Johnny Utahvor 2 Jahren

As someone in the Tech sales world, it is a rarity. Fact is mentoring rarely happens. Very few are willing to mentor in the self absorbed world we live in. The best career move I ever made accelerated my performance was hiring an executive coach. That would be my advice. Invest in yourself. Love the pod.

Profilbild von Pat Light

Pat Lightvor 2 Jahren

@chamath Sounds like a massive opportunity for anyone willing to show up to work. I’ve seen consistently in my company that I form stronger bonds and can help people move a long in their careers much easier when I see them consistently and thus they advance quicker.

Profilbild von Brent Fulfer

Brent Fulfervor 2 Jahren

Disagree and sounds like boomer talk. There are so many advantages working remote for your career > 9-5 grind in person. - Better leader of yourself. Working remote I’ve seen people elevate their careers faster by getting more done and being being more focused. Thus advancing faster. - Better Communicator. You can’t waste time and annoy your coworkers multiple times a day. Remote workers learn how to organize their days better and drive meeting with purpose. - Global mindset over local mindset. Working with teams around the globe people are better prepared to work with other cultures and work styles. In this era of work, having this skill set is incredibly important. Still love @theallinpod but they’re off here.

Profilbild von After Dinner

After Dinnervor 2 Jahren

@chamath I am at my most successful working remotely. What Chamath says might be true for B and C players (though skeptical), but not for A players.

Ähnliche Videos

$ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “You call them lunatics but the president just had this post where he says ‘we’re in discussions with a new and more reasonable regime’ – let me try to pin you down on that, who is this ‘new and more reasonable regime’? Is the United States in direct contact with them?” State Secretary Marco Rubio: “I’m not going to disclose to you who those people are, because it probably would get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran. Look, there’s some fractures going on there internally. And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything that’s happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that would be great. Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” “So we are always hopeful that that would exist over there. It’s unfortunate, the people of Iran are incredible people. The people who lead them, this clerical regime, that is the problem. And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future, that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world. But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability, that that is not the case. So we’re gonna test it.” George Stephanopoulos: “But the president said they are, is that the case or is it not? I’m just trying to get some clarity on that.” Marco Rubio: “So you have people that are saying some of the right things privately. Obviously, they’re not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you or put out there for the world doesn’t necessarily reflect what they’re saying in our conversations.”$

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “You call them lunatics but the president just had this post where he says ‘we’re in discussions with a new and more reasonable regime’ – let me try to pin you down on that, who is this ‘new and more reasonable regime’? Is the United States in direct contact with them?” State Secretary Marco Rubio: “I’m not going to disclose to you who those people are, because it probably would get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran. Look, there’s some fractures going on there internally. And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything that’s happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that would be great. Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” “So we are always hopeful that that would exist over there. It’s unfortunate, the people of Iran are incredible people. The people who lead them, this clerical regime, that is the problem. And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future, that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world. But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability, that that is not the case. So we’re gonna test it.” George Stephanopoulos: “But the president said they are, is that the case or is it not? I’m just trying to get some clarity on that.” Marco Rubio: “So you have people that are saying some of the right things privately. Obviously, they’re not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you or put out there for the world doesn’t necessarily reflect what they’re saying in our conversations.”

RedWave Press

419,627 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Friedberg’s Ideal Immigration Test: Worker or Welfare? (Or Makers vs Takers) “I'm all about discerning immigration, not on the lines of some cultural definition, but really around that simple framing of are you going to get social support services or are you going to work? Going back to my makers vs takers point, if the primary motivation for an individual to come to this country is to be given benefits, to be given payments, to be given social services, to be given support, I think that that person should be denied immigration. If the primary motivation for the individual to come to the United States is to work to progress themselves, to become a maker, to create things, to work in such a way that they can generate income, save capital, buy things, advance their family's position because they are denied those rights due to the tyranny of the place that they're coming from, then they should be granted immigration status to come to this country and contribute. Because at the end of the day, what people may not like to hear, which is the truth, is that every single one of those people is actually net positive in growing our economy. And everyone thinks it's a zero-sum game with respect to jobs in the United States, and we shouldn't let people into this country that create jobs. But the fundamental truth is that anyone that is productive, meaning they create more value than they take in, grows the economy and more jobs get created, and overall, we all benefit from having those individuals here in this country. And by the way, if you are going to work, you are going to culturally assimilate, because that is what the United States is based on, which is productivity, work hard, create things, and have individual agency, have the ability to progress yourself in this world, in this society. And if you take advantage of that opportunity, you're going to love the American ideals that this country was founded upon.”

Friedberg’s Ideal Immigration Test: Worker or Welfare? (Or Makers vs Takers) “I'm all about discerning immigration, not on the lines of some cultural definition, but really around that simple framing of are you going to get social support services or are you going to work? Going back to my makers vs takers point, if the primary motivation for an individual to come to this country is to be given benefits, to be given payments, to be given social services, to be given support, I think that that person should be denied immigration. If the primary motivation for the individual to come to the United States is to work to progress themselves, to become a maker, to create things, to work in such a way that they can generate income, save capital, buy things, advance their family's position because they are denied those rights due to the tyranny of the place that they're coming from, then they should be granted immigration status to come to this country and contribute. Because at the end of the day, what people may not like to hear, which is the truth, is that every single one of those people is actually net positive in growing our economy. And everyone thinks it's a zero-sum game with respect to jobs in the United States, and we shouldn't let people into this country that create jobs. But the fundamental truth is that anyone that is productive, meaning they create more value than they take in, grows the economy and more jobs get created, and overall, we all benefit from having those individuals here in this country. And by the way, if you are going to work, you are going to culturally assimilate, because that is what the United States is based on, which is productivity, work hard, create things, and have individual agency, have the ability to progress yourself in this world, in this society. And if you take advantage of that opportunity, you're going to love the American ideals that this country was founded upon.”

The All-In Podcast

55,036 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Mark Zuckerberg on why the people you surround yourself with matter more than you think "The most important decision you're probably going to make if you're in college is who you surround yourself with, because you become like the people you surround yourself with" "When you're in college trying to figure out what your circle is going to be, or evaluating different job opportunities... who are the people, even if they're peers, who in an alternate universe you would want to work for?" "Because you think you're going to learn a lot from them, because they're values-aligned on the things you care about, and they're going to push you. They know different things and have different experiences that are more of what you want to become like over time" "I think in general people are too obsessed and maybe not focused enough on the connections and the people who they're building relationships with"

Mark Zuckerberg on why the people you surround yourself with matter more than you think "The most important decision you're probably going to make if you're in college is who you surround yourself with, because you become like the people you surround yourself with" "When you're in college trying to figure out what your circle is going to be, or evaluating different job opportunities... who are the people, even if they're peers, who in an alternate universe you would want to work for?" "Because you think you're going to learn a lot from them, because they're values-aligned on the things you care about, and they're going to push you. They know different things and have different experiences that are more of what you want to become like over time" "I think in general people are too obsessed and maybe not focused enough on the connections and the people who they're building relationships with"

Jaynit

26,918 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk: If you are creating a company or joining a company the most important thing is to attract great people "If you are creating a company or joining a company the most important thing is to attract great people, so either be with or join a group that's amazing that you really respect, or if you have building a company you have to gather great people I mean all the company is a group of people that have gathered together to create a product or service and so depending upon how talented and hardworking that group is, and the degree to which they're focused, cohesively, and in a good direction, that will determine the success of the company Do everything you can to gather great people, if you are creating a company"

Elon Musk: If you are creating a company or joining a company the most important thing is to attract great people "If you are creating a company or joining a company the most important thing is to attract great people, so either be with or join a group that's amazing that you really respect, or if you have building a company you have to gather great people I mean all the company is a group of people that have gathered together to create a product or service and so depending upon how talented and hardworking that group is, and the degree to which they're focused, cohesively, and in a good direction, that will determine the success of the company Do everything you can to gather great people, if you are creating a company"

SMX 🇺🇸

12,251 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Sam Altman says AI leaders have done a terrible job at communicating to the public: “The, ‘Dear peasants, we will bequeath upon you these gifts of a cure for cancer and material wealth and great entertainment, and you stop complaining, and we'll make all the decisions about the future and just trust us, we'll be benevolent dictators.’ That’s not good. Not good.” “A lot of the people building AI have been saying, ‘There's a 25% chance we're going to destroy the world, and yet we're going to race ahead to do it because otherwise those bad guys will do it first.’” “Or, ‘Man, this thing is going to be really terrible, and 50% of the jobs are going to go away in the next year, and we hope you all are okay, but it seems really scary.’” “We have not, as a field, done a very good job of explaining to people what the benefits are and how the downsides can be mitigated—and we certainly have not done a good job even if people have had answers like saying, ‘There's going to be UBI, or work will be optional.’” “There's been very little discussion from people about how and why it's important that people have more power and personal freedom in the world, not less. And that matters a lot to most people.” “The ability of people to influence their own future and collectively design where society is going to go, and the autonomy that comes with that, is very important. I don't think a lot of people in the AI field… they feel it for themselves, but they don't spend much time thinking about it, reflecting on or acknowledging how important that is to other people.”

Sam Altman says AI leaders have done a terrible job at communicating to the public: “The, ‘Dear peasants, we will bequeath upon you these gifts of a cure for cancer and material wealth and great entertainment, and you stop complaining, and we'll make all the decisions about the future and just trust us, we'll be benevolent dictators.’ That’s not good. Not good.” “A lot of the people building AI have been saying, ‘There's a 25% chance we're going to destroy the world, and yet we're going to race ahead to do it because otherwise those bad guys will do it first.’” “Or, ‘Man, this thing is going to be really terrible, and 50% of the jobs are going to go away in the next year, and we hope you all are okay, but it seems really scary.’” “We have not, as a field, done a very good job of explaining to people what the benefits are and how the downsides can be mitigated—and we certainly have not done a good job even if people have had answers like saying, ‘There's going to be UBI, or work will be optional.’” “There's been very little discussion from people about how and why it's important that people have more power and personal freedom in the world, not less. And that matters a lot to most people.” “The ability of people to influence their own future and collectively design where society is going to go, and the autonomy that comes with that, is very important. I don't think a lot of people in the AI field… they feel it for themselves, but they don't spend much time thinking about it, reflecting on or acknowledging how important that is to other people.”

David Senra

32,300 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

Trump: You have some vaccines that are so amazing. The polio vaccine I think is amazing. A lot of people think that covid is amazing. You know. I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated. You have vaccines that work. Just pure and simple they work. They're not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used otherwise some people are going to catch it and they endanger other people. And when you don't have controversy at all, I think people should take them.

Trump: You have some vaccines that are so amazing. The polio vaccine I think is amazing. A lot of people think that covid is amazing. You know. I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated. You have vaccines that work. Just pure and simple they work. They're not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used otherwise some people are going to catch it and they endanger other people. And when you don't have controversy at all, I think people should take them.

Acyn

718,768 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.Anish Acharya says the future of AI isn’t one model to rule them all—and explains why platforms that integrate multiple models will benefit the most: "I think we're going to need and rely on all of the models." "It's sort of like if you have a team of people... if you have five people, they could all do a basic set of things pretty capably." "But then they all have their specializations. Maybe one of them is really good at closing a customer who doesn't want to sign the deal, and one of them is really good at culture and getting the best out of the team." "There are some areas in which they are going to build apps, and that will be a threat to app companies. But there are many areas in which app companies are advantaged. Cursor and Krea are great examples of this—products where you benefit from being multi-model." "When you actually use a creative tool, you don't want to just use Nano Banana, you want to have access to OpenAI, Nano Banana, Kling—all of them—Qwen, you name it. So using a single interface to access all the models is powerful." Anish Acharya on BILLIONS with Guillaume Moubeche

.Anish Acharya says the future of AI isn’t one model to rule them all—and explains why platforms that integrate multiple models will benefit the most: "I think we're going to need and rely on all of the models." "It's sort of like if you have a team of people... if you have five people, they could all do a basic set of things pretty capably." "But then they all have their specializations. Maybe one of them is really good at closing a customer who doesn't want to sign the deal, and one of them is really good at culture and getting the best out of the team." "There are some areas in which they are going to build apps, and that will be a threat to app companies. But there are many areas in which app companies are advantaged. Cursor and Krea are great examples of this—products where you benefit from being multi-model." "When you actually use a creative tool, you don't want to just use Nano Banana, you want to have access to OpenAI, Nano Banana, Kling—all of them—Qwen, you name it. So using a single interface to access all the models is powerful." Anish Acharya on BILLIONS with Guillaume Moubeche

a16z

33,283 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

SORKIN: “Students are deeply fearful and worried about whether they're going to have a job.” BEZOS: “Yeah, and the reason they're afraid of that is because all these smart people keep saying that … These people are wrong!”

SORKIN: “Students are deeply fearful and worried about whether they're going to have a job.” BEZOS: “Yeah, and the reason they're afraid of that is because all these smart people keep saying that … These people are wrong!”

Chief Nerd

290,557 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Head coach Dave Aranda's full quote on what he would say to frustrated fans: "We’ve got a bunch of really, really good people in the program that are doing everything they can to get wins and to make it an entertaining product for the fans. It means so much when there are fans there and there’s a home-field environment. I look at the guys that are on our team right now, who have been through so much and are such quality football — really good football players — more than that, but just quality people. They’re the type of people that maybe some of the people who are talking about them knew them better, would be all for them, and support them no matter what. I think for them, to have it where their work is being rewarded with people that got their back in a critical game would be cool, but I understand what you’re saying. I can definitely see that."

Head coach Dave Aranda's full quote on what he would say to frustrated fans: "We’ve got a bunch of really, really good people in the program that are doing everything they can to get wins and to make it an entertaining product for the fans. It means so much when there are fans there and there’s a home-field environment. I look at the guys that are on our team right now, who have been through so much and are such quality football — really good football players — more than that, but just quality people. They’re the type of people that maybe some of the people who are talking about them knew them better, would be all for them, and support them no matter what. I think for them, to have it where their work is being rewarded with people that got their back in a critical game would be cool, but I understand what you’re saying. I can definitely see that."

Baylor Bears on SicEm365

13,292 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Angelina Jolie Has Finally Woken Up To The Fact The United Nations & Governments Are Run By Heartless Criminals There’s No Accountability For Crimes “If There’s A Business Interest Involved” “That is the biggest that is the most disheartening thing of I think we we or I thought at least even 20 years ago when I started to work internationally that there was this I in my head, some weird idea of good guys. You know? Some idea of those whether it be certain countries or certain people's maybe it was this holdover from World War 2 and this thought that this was, like so that the lines were clear and that there was going to be these human rights goals laid out and that there would be things stood up for, and that if these things weren't done, there would be pushback, and these were the and I really thought that's what it was. I even thought that's what the United Nations was… And I thought, okay. There's a there's some lines in the sand. There's some understanding. We're gonna grow and fight for improvements in these areas. And and to watch to watch and understand more and more how it's just simply that's not what it is. That's not the world. The world is not these are human rights. It is these are human rights sometimes for these people, maybe sometimes for these people, never for these people. Yeah. It's food aid, 6% for these people, 50% for these people, it's justice for these people, but not these people. Accountability for this crime, but not that crime if there's business interest. And this is truly the ugly state of of so much of the world that we are just becoming more and more aware of for just about every I mean, I don't know any countries that are are clean of it and, um, and willing to hold a line really consistently hand on behalf of the of human rights and laws”

Angelina Jolie Has Finally Woken Up To The Fact The United Nations & Governments Are Run By Heartless Criminals There’s No Accountability For Crimes “If There’s A Business Interest Involved” “That is the biggest that is the most disheartening thing of I think we we or I thought at least even 20 years ago when I started to work internationally that there was this I in my head, some weird idea of good guys. You know? Some idea of those whether it be certain countries or certain people's maybe it was this holdover from World War 2 and this thought that this was, like so that the lines were clear and that there was going to be these human rights goals laid out and that there would be things stood up for, and that if these things weren't done, there would be pushback, and these were the and I really thought that's what it was. I even thought that's what the United Nations was… And I thought, okay. There's a there's some lines in the sand. There's some understanding. We're gonna grow and fight for improvements in these areas. And and to watch to watch and understand more and more how it's just simply that's not what it is. That's not the world. The world is not these are human rights. It is these are human rights sometimes for these people, maybe sometimes for these people, never for these people. Yeah. It's food aid, 6% for these people, 50% for these people, it's justice for these people, but not these people. Accountability for this crime, but not that crime if there's business interest. And this is truly the ugly state of of so much of the world that we are just becoming more and more aware of for just about every I mean, I don't know any countries that are are clean of it and, um, and willing to hold a line really consistently hand on behalf of the of human rights and laws”

Wall Street Apes

658,860 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Rep. Clark: Trump is shutting the door on the American people who already know they have a health care system that doesn't work for them. They are already seeing dramatic increases in prices due to tariffs. They are so worried that their small businesses are going to not be able to keep their doors open. These are the very real things, and the response from Trump is 'we're not going to work with you'

Rep. Clark: Trump is shutting the door on the American people who already know they have a health care system that doesn't work for them. They are already seeing dramatic increases in prices due to tariffs. They are so worried that their small businesses are going to not be able to keep their doors open. These are the very real things, and the response from Trump is 'we're not going to work with you'

FactPost

16,641 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Mark Zuckerberg: "I'd rather hire someone with raw intelligence and no experience than a 10-year veteran" "The two most important things I look for, number one is just raw intelligence." Zuckerberg explains why: "You can hire someone who is a software engineer and has been doing it for 10 years. If they've been doing it for 10 years, that's probably what they're doing for their life. And that's cool. There are things that person can do. They're definitely useful in an organization." But here's the tradeoff: "If you find someone whose raw intelligence exceeds theirs but has way less experience, they can probably adapt and learn way quicker. Within a very short amount of time, they'll be able to do a lot of things that the experienced person may never be able to do." The second thing he looks for: "Alignment with what we're trying to do. People can be really smart or have skills that are directly applicable. But if they don't really believe in it, they're not going to work hard. Even if they're a smart guy who doesn't have the relevant experience, if they don't care enough, they're not going to develop the relevant experience in order to succeed." On who he's actually hired: "The best people I've hired so far have been people who didn't really have that much engineering experience. I hired a couple of electrical engineers out of Stanford as new programming staff. They had very little programming experience going in. But just really smart. Really willing to go at it." He gives an example: "The guy who built Photos was one of those guys. If you're willing to just go and do whatever it takes to get it out, you're probably more valuable than someone who's just a career software engineer."

Mark Zuckerberg: "I'd rather hire someone with raw intelligence and no experience than a 10-year veteran" "The two most important things I look for, number one is just raw intelligence." Zuckerberg explains why: "You can hire someone who is a software engineer and has been doing it for 10 years. If they've been doing it for 10 years, that's probably what they're doing for their life. And that's cool. There are things that person can do. They're definitely useful in an organization." But here's the tradeoff: "If you find someone whose raw intelligence exceeds theirs but has way less experience, they can probably adapt and learn way quicker. Within a very short amount of time, they'll be able to do a lot of things that the experienced person may never be able to do." The second thing he looks for: "Alignment with what we're trying to do. People can be really smart or have skills that are directly applicable. But if they don't really believe in it, they're not going to work hard. Even if they're a smart guy who doesn't have the relevant experience, if they don't care enough, they're not going to develop the relevant experience in order to succeed." On who he's actually hired: "The best people I've hired so far have been people who didn't really have that much engineering experience. I hired a couple of electrical engineers out of Stanford as new programming staff. They had very little programming experience going in. But just really smart. Really willing to go at it." He gives an example: "The guy who built Photos was one of those guys. If you're willing to just go and do whatever it takes to get it out, you're probably more valuable than someone who's just a career software engineer."

Jaynit

402,132 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Chamath: Google is a compounding machine and can win the entire AI stack Chamath Palihapitiya reacts to $GOOG dropping ~7% after raising its capex forecast to ~$200B for 2026: “Do you know what Google's 25-year average return on invested capital has been since going public? 32%. When you are a machine, and a group of people, and a business model that compounds money at 32% over a 20-year average, you give these guys the benefit of the doubt. These are not people that are flying fast and loose, they are methodically investing in their edge. They are going to get massively rewarded. Google has an incredible search experience. They seem to be navigating this transition to use AI. They have an incredible cloud business, and they have an incredible silicon business. The best thing that can happen to them is 500 different models proliferate, and they support all of them. Because they will make so much money at the silicon layer, they'll make so much money as the cloud provider, and they'll find a bunch of apps, including YouTube and other things, to make money from because you use the AI to target ads better or to help make better content, etc., etc. Jason: “Fragmentation is good for them.” Chamath: “Oh, it's great for them. It's a compounding machine.”

Chamath: Google is a compounding machine and can win the entire AI stack Chamath Palihapitiya reacts to $GOOG dropping ~7% after raising its capex forecast to ~$200B for 2026: “Do you know what Google's 25-year average return on invested capital has been since going public? 32%. When you are a machine, and a group of people, and a business model that compounds money at 32% over a 20-year average, you give these guys the benefit of the doubt. These are not people that are flying fast and loose, they are methodically investing in their edge. They are going to get massively rewarded. Google has an incredible search experience. They seem to be navigating this transition to use AI. They have an incredible cloud business, and they have an incredible silicon business. The best thing that can happen to them is 500 different models proliferate, and they support all of them. Because they will make so much money at the silicon layer, they'll make so much money as the cloud provider, and they'll find a bunch of apps, including YouTube and other things, to make money from because you use the AI to target ads better or to help make better content, etc., etc. Jason: “Fragmentation is good for them.” Chamath: “Oh, it's great for them. It's a compounding machine.”

The All-In Podcast

111,654 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Kenny Omega and Will Ospreay's feud "is a lot deeper than a WWE feud. WWE, you're used to very shallow. They tried to go a little deeper with Roman Reigns and Seth Rollins. AEW gears itself for people who are really really into it with the idea that if you challenge them they're going to be more into it. Some people say it's not simple enough or I don't wanna think this much and they're not wrong. It's good to have different types of wrestling and different types of appeal." - Dave Meltzer

Kenny Omega and Will Ospreay's feud "is a lot deeper than a WWE feud. WWE, you're used to very shallow. They tried to go a little deeper with Roman Reigns and Seth Rollins. AEW gears itself for people who are really really into it with the idea that if you challenge them they're going to be more into it. Some people say it's not simple enough or I don't wanna think this much and they're not wrong. It's good to have different types of wrestling and different types of appeal." - Dave Meltzer

Wrestling Observer

165,767 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Villa: Small business owners are struggling because people are not going to their small businesses. The community is not going out to shop. We are seeing people who are still fearful of sending their children to school or going to pick them up. They’re relying on each other, a network that they’ve created to help with that. We are seeing grocery stores empty and volunteers having to make food runs for people in the community.

Villa: Small business owners are struggling because people are not going to their small businesses. The community is not going out to shop. We are seeing people who are still fearful of sending their children to school or going to pick them up. They’re relying on each other, a network that they’ve created to help with that. We are seeing grocery stores empty and volunteers having to make food runs for people in the community.

Acyn

57,811 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

SNYDER: You can't imagine Trump or Hegseth visiting Kyiv. It's not that it's not going to happen. It's just unimaginable. It's psychically impossible for them. They can't be in a world where people are actually taking real risks for real things. That would be too much for them. They can't be in a place where there is courage. That would be opposed to just manipulating the rest of us with words, which is designed to make them look tough. They'd never take any risk for anything themselves. They believe that all talk of patriotism, democracy is just for show. These are people who fundamentally will just tell you what you want to hear in order to get what they want personally. For them, whole idea of democracy, and even national sovereignty, is all just a joke, right? Just a means to an end. When they're confronted by others for whom democracy or national sovereignty isn't a joke, who would fight for freedom. Not just use words like "fight for freedom," but who would, like Ukraine, do it, when they're confronted and are doing it. Have been doing it for 4 and a half years now, they don't have a way to respond besides scorn, spite, and dismissal. That's the only thing they can do, because they're in a world where those are all words, and it's all just words. When they're confronted with actual human beings, men and women who are actually taking risks, they're helpless. They have to get that topic off the table. They're only comfortable in a world where everybody is venal and hypocritical. Where everybody lies all the time. And so I think that's the fundamental thing: it's just really uncomfortable for them.

SNYDER: You can't imagine Trump or Hegseth visiting Kyiv. It's not that it's not going to happen. It's just unimaginable. It's psychically impossible for them. They can't be in a world where people are actually taking real risks for real things. That would be too much for them. They can't be in a place where there is courage. That would be opposed to just manipulating the rest of us with words, which is designed to make them look tough. They'd never take any risk for anything themselves. They believe that all talk of patriotism, democracy is just for show. These are people who fundamentally will just tell you what you want to hear in order to get what they want personally. For them, whole idea of democracy, and even national sovereignty, is all just a joke, right? Just a means to an end. When they're confronted by others for whom democracy or national sovereignty isn't a joke, who would fight for freedom. Not just use words like "fight for freedom," but who would, like Ukraine, do it, when they're confronted and are doing it. Have been doing it for 4 and a half years now, they don't have a way to respond besides scorn, spite, and dismissal. That's the only thing they can do, because they're in a world where those are all words, and it's all just words. When they're confronted with actual human beings, men and women who are actually taking risks, they're helpless. They have to get that topic off the table. They're only comfortable in a world where everybody is venal and hypocritical. Where everybody lies all the time. And so I think that's the fundamental thing: it's just really uncomfortable for them.

Kate from Kharkiv

170,879 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat