Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Renowned microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi has issued a stunning declaration, labeling mRNA vaccines as "the greatest danger humanity has ever threatened." But his latest argument isn't just scientific—it's legal. He points to a seismic shift in the United States: Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s withdrawal of vaccination recommendations for healthy,...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

444,237 subscribers

170,270 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Здоровье и велнесНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Renowned microbiologist Dr. Bhakdi asserts that the COVID-19 vaccine is the single greatest cause of myocarditis in the world, implicating it in clinically diagnosed cases for "at least one to two percent" of recipients. He goes further, labeling every case of vaccine-induced myocarditis as life-threatening, stating, "You must not shorten the life of a human being." Most alarmingly, he claims the scientific link is so absolute that any doctor who denies this must be "immediately... excluded, not allowed to be a doctor anymore." According to Dr. Bhakdi, this established scientific causality means a diagnosed case of myocarditis can be used as legal proof that the injury was caused by the COVID-19 vaccination.
1:10

Renowned microbiologist Dr. Bhakdi asserts that the COVID-19 vaccine is the single greatest cause of myocarditis in the world, implicating it in clinically diagnosed cases for "at least one to two percent" of recipients. He goes further, labeling every case of vaccine-induced myocarditis as life-threatening, stating, "You must not shorten the life of a human being." Most alarmingly, he claims the scientific link is so absolute that any doctor who denies this must be "immediately... excluded, not allowed to be a doctor anymore." According to Dr. Bhakdi, this established scientific causality means a diagnosed case of myocarditis can be used as legal proof that the injury was caused by the COVID-19 vaccination.

Camus

75,075 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

RFK Jr.'s FDA, July 1, 2025: The COVID jabs cause myocarditis, but we're not pulling them. Sucharit Bhakdi, May 1, 2024: "Of 100 people who get myocarditis today, something in the range of 20 to 50% will not be among us after 10 years...[& the rate per million] is 1-2%." Sucharit Bhakdi, a retired Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and former Chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, describes for Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson (Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson) how the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine—a congressionally chartered organization that serves as the collective scientific national academy of the United States—has confirmed that both Pfizer and Moderna's COVID injections cause myocarditis. Estimating the rate of myocarditis post COVID injection based on a study published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease in 2022, Bhakdi says it's likely that one to two percent of injection recipients will develop the heart condition. Meaning out of every 1,000,000 injection recipients, up to 20,000 will develop myocarditis. Of that cohort, Bhakdi says, we can expect up to 50% to die within the next 10 years. "[T]hey looked at al the literature, all the evidence" and for most conditions possibly caused by the COVID injections, "they were not completely sure and the data are still not sufficient," Bhakdi says of the National Academies injection analysis. He notes that "For myocarditis, [they said it's] now established that the myocarditis comes from the vaccination...And they wrote that further scientific investigation will not lead to any other conclusion." This means that "any myocarditis that anyone sees in the world following vaccination is known now to be due to the vaccine," Bhakdi adds. He goes on to highlight the paper published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, saying that the team, made of Thai researchers working in Thailand, "used [modern medical] techniques to see what the incidence was of myocarditis in young people, and the results were completely clear: incidence was something in the range of...1 to 2%." One percent means if you "vaccinate" 1,000,000 people, 10,000 are going to get myocarditis," Bhakdi notes. He adds that myocarditis is a "slow killer" that will wipe out 20 to 50% of those affected by it within a decade. He notes the injections have doubtlessly "shortened the lifespan of [affected children] by decades." "[T]his is murder," Bhakdi says.
6:16

Sensitive content

RFK Jr.'s FDA, July 1, 2025: The COVID jabs cause myocarditis, but we're not pulling them. Sucharit Bhakdi, May 1, 2024: "Of 100 people who get myocarditis today, something in the range of 20 to 50% will not be among us after 10 years...[& the rate per million] is 1-2%." Sucharit Bhakdi, a retired Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and former Chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, describes for Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson (Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson) how the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine—a congressionally chartered organization that serves as the collective scientific national academy of the United States—has confirmed that both Pfizer and Moderna's COVID injections cause myocarditis. Estimating the rate of myocarditis post COVID injection based on a study published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease in 2022, Bhakdi says it's likely that one to two percent of injection recipients will develop the heart condition. Meaning out of every 1,000,000 injection recipients, up to 20,000 will develop myocarditis. Of that cohort, Bhakdi says, we can expect up to 50% to die within the next 10 years. "[T]hey looked at al the literature, all the evidence" and for most conditions possibly caused by the COVID injections, "they were not completely sure and the data are still not sufficient," Bhakdi says of the National Academies injection analysis. He notes that "For myocarditis, [they said it's] now established that the myocarditis comes from the vaccination...And they wrote that further scientific investigation will not lead to any other conclusion." This means that "any myocarditis that anyone sees in the world following vaccination is known now to be due to the vaccine," Bhakdi adds. He goes on to highlight the paper published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, saying that the team, made of Thai researchers working in Thailand, "used [modern medical] techniques to see what the incidence was of myocarditis in young people, and the results were completely clear: incidence was something in the range of...1 to 2%." One percent means if you "vaccinate" 1,000,000 people, 10,000 are going to get myocarditis," Bhakdi notes. He adds that myocarditis is a "slow killer" that will wipe out 20 to 50% of those affected by it within a decade. He notes the injections have doubtlessly "shortened the lifespan of [affected children] by decades." "[T]his is murder," Bhakdi says.

Sense Receptor

22,063 просмотров • 1 год назад

Three Layers of Liability Protection. 1986 Vaccine Injury Act. The PREP Act. EUA Immunity. The Institutions That Forced Young Men Into Vaccines Are the Most Culpable — and the Most Protected. The acute wave of myocarditis and cardiac arrest has ebbed. What remains: late neurological injury, Guillain-Barré syndrome, venous and arterial damage, strokes. The most infuriating group: scholastic institutions that mandated vaccines for young males — the highest risk group for myocarditis — well into the Omicron era when the clinical case for vaccination had already collapsed. They caused the harm. Three layers of legal protection ensure they face none of the consequences. Join the Fight: Courtesy of Ask Dr. Drew Ask Dr. Drew, Dr. Drew Dr. Drew #MedicalFreedom
1:09

Three Layers of Liability Protection. 1986 Vaccine Injury Act. The PREP Act. EUA Immunity. The Institutions That Forced Young Men Into Vaccines Are the Most Culpable — and the Most Protected. The acute wave of myocarditis and cardiac arrest has ebbed. What remains: late neurological injury, Guillain-Barré syndrome, venous and arterial damage, strokes. The most infuriating group: scholastic institutions that mandated vaccines for young males — the highest risk group for myocarditis — well into the Omicron era when the clinical case for vaccination had already collapsed. They caused the harm. Three layers of legal protection ensure they face none of the consequences. Join the Fight: Courtesy of Ask Dr. Drew Ask Dr. Drew, Dr. Drew Dr. Drew #MedicalFreedom

McCullough Foundation

12,252 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a renowned microbiologist and immunologist, is issuing a dire warning to humanity about the dangers of mRNA vaccines. He claims that the integration of foreign genes into human chromosomes through these vaccines poses catastrophic risks—not only to individuals but to future generations. According to Dr. Bhakdi, the introduction of bacterial plasmids and foreign DNA into human cells via mRNA vaccines is a reckless experiment that could lead to permanent genetic alterations. "Any foreign gene integrated into your chromosome can trigger cancer immediately, cause widespread cellular dysfunction, and be passed down to your offspring," Dr. Bhakdi warns. He emphasizes that once these genetic changes occur, they are irreversible, transforming the very blueprint of human biology. Every cell altered by these foreign genes, he argues, is "doomed," setting the stage for unpredictable and potentially devastating health consequences. Dr. Bhakdi asserts that global health authorities like the WHO, CDC, and FDA are pushing these vaccines without fully acknowledging their risks. He points to the presence of bacterial-derived plasmids in mRNA vaccines, which he claims can infiltrate human cells and wreak havoc on genetic stability. This, he says, is not a theoretical concern but a reality already unfolding with the rollout of these vaccines worldwide. This is not a message of fear but a call to awareness. Dr. Bhakdi urges people to question the narrative, demand transparency, and protect their health and future generations from what he describes as a dangerous overreach by global health institutions. "We are at a crossroads," he declares. "The genetic integrity of humanity is at stake."
1:50

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a renowned microbiologist and immunologist, is issuing a dire warning to humanity about the dangers of mRNA vaccines. He claims that the integration of foreign genes into human chromosomes through these vaccines poses catastrophic risks—not only to individuals but to future generations. According to Dr. Bhakdi, the introduction of bacterial plasmids and foreign DNA into human cells via mRNA vaccines is a reckless experiment that could lead to permanent genetic alterations. "Any foreign gene integrated into your chromosome can trigger cancer immediately, cause widespread cellular dysfunction, and be passed down to your offspring," Dr. Bhakdi warns. He emphasizes that once these genetic changes occur, they are irreversible, transforming the very blueprint of human biology. Every cell altered by these foreign genes, he argues, is "doomed," setting the stage for unpredictable and potentially devastating health consequences. Dr. Bhakdi asserts that global health authorities like the WHO, CDC, and FDA are pushing these vaccines without fully acknowledging their risks. He points to the presence of bacterial-derived plasmids in mRNA vaccines, which he claims can infiltrate human cells and wreak havoc on genetic stability. This, he says, is not a theoretical concern but a reality already unfolding with the rollout of these vaccines worldwide. This is not a message of fear but a call to awareness. Dr. Bhakdi urges people to question the narrative, demand transparency, and protect their health and future generations from what he describes as a dangerous overreach by global health institutions. "We are at a crossroads," he declares. "The genetic integrity of humanity is at stake."

Camus

56,578 просмотров • 1 год назад

Renowned Microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: "COVID mRNA Vaccines Are Genocide—There Is No Other Explanation" The warnings from some of the world’s most respected scientists are growing louder—and more urgent. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, alongside Dr. Mike Yeadon and Stanford’s Dr. John Ioannidis, is sounding the alarm: what we are witnessing is not just medical malpractice, but a coordinated assault on humanity through COVID mRNA vaccines. For over a year, Bhakdi and his colleagues have been dismissed as conspiracy theorists. Yet, as the evidence mounts, even the most skeptical are being forced to confront an unthinkable reality. "Up until a year and a half ago, I would never have believed it," Bhakdi admits. "But now, I must acknowledge that those who called this genocide may be right. There is no other explanation." The facts are undeniable: - The virus was never the existential threat we were told. The data has always shown that COVID-19 is not a "killer virus" destroying mankind. Those who claim otherwise are perpetuating a lie. - The gene-based vaccines were never capable of stopping infection. The science is clear: immunity to coronaviruses is not antibody-dependent—it relies on T cells, which every human already possesses. The vaccines were doomed to fail from the start. - These injections are biological weapons. They are not vaccines. They are experimental gene therapies that attack the mind, the heart, the organs, and the very fabric of human health. Their long-term effects are catastrophic, and their true purpose is increasingly impossible to ignore. "There is no other agenda," Bhakdi asserts. "These COVID mRNA vaccines are the most destructive instruments ever introduced into the human body. They are designed to harm, not heal. And if we do not act, they will destroy mankind." The question is no longer if this is happening—it is why. And the answer is too horrifying to ignore. The time for silence is over. Share this. Demand answers. Before it’s too late.
2:59

Renowned Microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: "COVID mRNA Vaccines Are Genocide—There Is No Other Explanation" The warnings from some of the world’s most respected scientists are growing louder—and more urgent. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, alongside Dr. Mike Yeadon and Stanford’s Dr. John Ioannidis, is sounding the alarm: what we are witnessing is not just medical malpractice, but a coordinated assault on humanity through COVID mRNA vaccines. For over a year, Bhakdi and his colleagues have been dismissed as conspiracy theorists. Yet, as the evidence mounts, even the most skeptical are being forced to confront an unthinkable reality. "Up until a year and a half ago, I would never have believed it," Bhakdi admits. "But now, I must acknowledge that those who called this genocide may be right. There is no other explanation." The facts are undeniable: - The virus was never the existential threat we were told. The data has always shown that COVID-19 is not a "killer virus" destroying mankind. Those who claim otherwise are perpetuating a lie. - The gene-based vaccines were never capable of stopping infection. The science is clear: immunity to coronaviruses is not antibody-dependent—it relies on T cells, which every human already possesses. The vaccines were doomed to fail from the start. - These injections are biological weapons. They are not vaccines. They are experimental gene therapies that attack the mind, the heart, the organs, and the very fabric of human health. Their long-term effects are catastrophic, and their true purpose is increasingly impossible to ignore. "There is no other agenda," Bhakdi asserts. "These COVID mRNA vaccines are the most destructive instruments ever introduced into the human body. They are designed to harm, not heal. And if we do not act, they will destroy mankind." The question is no longer if this is happening—it is why. And the answer is too horrifying to ignore. The time for silence is over. Share this. Demand answers. Before it’s too late.

Camus

82,785 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

In 1986, a one-year-old child received 3 vaccine injections. Today, that number has skyrocketed to 29. This exponential increase hasn't occurred in a vacuum; it's happened within a system deliberately engineered to remove corporate liability and critical oversight. As highlighted in a recent discussion, the core of the issue is a fundamental divergence in how products are regulated. For pharmaceuticals, companies face massive financial and legal repercussions for unsafe products. This necessitates rigorous, long-term, placebo-controlled trials. But for vaccines, the landscape is entirely different. As legal expert Aaron Siri often outlines, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created a paradigm shift. Vaccine manufacturers were granted a critical shield: they would no longer be liable for injuries caused by their products. This changed everything. The incentive structure was flipped. Without the threat of class-action lawsuits or product liability claims—the primary drivers of corporate accountability in every other industry—what kind of safety trials were conducted? The answer, as detailed in numerous analyses, is trials that are profoundly inadequate: - Duration: Days or weeks of safety review. - Design: No true placebo controls. - Scale: Insufficient numbers of children to detect rarer, long-term adverse events. For 40 years, this industry has operated with virtually no meaningful pushback. When your car or a child's car seat has a defect, you hear about it because of massive legal action. That signal is silenced for vaccines. So, who is minding the ship? The two traditional guardians of public safety are both compromised: 1. The Legal System: Class-action attorneys have been entirely neutered by the 1986 law. 2. Federal Health Agencies: These bodies are caught in an irreconcilable conflict of interest. They are tasked with both promoting vaccination and defending vaccines in the government's Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). They are, in effect, the cheerleader and the judge for the same product. The result is a system that operates on pure economic and bureaucratic momentum. Pharmaceutical companies, like any good business, promote their products through trusted intermediaries. There is no conspiracy—only a system operating exactly as designed, with conflicts of interest baked into its foundation. Understanding this framework—the lack of liability, the weakened trials, the neutered legal system, and the conflicted regulators—is key to demystifying the last four decades of vaccine policy. It’s not about the science; it’s about the structure.
1:55

In 1986, a one-year-old child received 3 vaccine injections. Today, that number has skyrocketed to 29. This exponential increase hasn't occurred in a vacuum; it's happened within a system deliberately engineered to remove corporate liability and critical oversight. As highlighted in a recent discussion, the core of the issue is a fundamental divergence in how products are regulated. For pharmaceuticals, companies face massive financial and legal repercussions for unsafe products. This necessitates rigorous, long-term, placebo-controlled trials. But for vaccines, the landscape is entirely different. As legal expert Aaron Siri often outlines, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created a paradigm shift. Vaccine manufacturers were granted a critical shield: they would no longer be liable for injuries caused by their products. This changed everything. The incentive structure was flipped. Without the threat of class-action lawsuits or product liability claims—the primary drivers of corporate accountability in every other industry—what kind of safety trials were conducted? The answer, as detailed in numerous analyses, is trials that are profoundly inadequate: - Duration: Days or weeks of safety review. - Design: No true placebo controls. - Scale: Insufficient numbers of children to detect rarer, long-term adverse events. For 40 years, this industry has operated with virtually no meaningful pushback. When your car or a child's car seat has a defect, you hear about it because of massive legal action. That signal is silenced for vaccines. So, who is minding the ship? The two traditional guardians of public safety are both compromised: 1. The Legal System: Class-action attorneys have been entirely neutered by the 1986 law. 2. Federal Health Agencies: These bodies are caught in an irreconcilable conflict of interest. They are tasked with both promoting vaccination and defending vaccines in the government's Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). They are, in effect, the cheerleader and the judge for the same product. The result is a system that operates on pure economic and bureaucratic momentum. Pharmaceutical companies, like any good business, promote their products through trusted intermediaries. There is no conspiracy—only a system operating exactly as designed, with conflicts of interest baked into its foundation. Understanding this framework—the lack of liability, the weakened trials, the neutered legal system, and the conflicted regulators—is key to demystifying the last four decades of vaccine policy. It’s not about the science; it’s about the structure.

Camus

103,492 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

In light of The Telegraph now admitting that the Covid injections "can cause heart damage," here's Sucharit Bhakdi—in April 2024—noting that out of every 1 million Covid-jab recipients, ~10,000 will get myocarditis. Of those, ~20-50% will die within 10 years. The retired Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and former Chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, describes for Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson (Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson) how the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine—a congressionally chartered organization that serves as the collective scientific national academy of the United States—has confirmed that both Pfizer and Moderna's COVID injections cause myocarditis. Estimating the rate of myocarditis post COVID injection based on a study published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease in 2022, Bhakdi says it's likely that one to two percent of injection recipients will develop the heart condition. Meaning out of every 1,000,000 injection recipients, up to 20,000 will develop myocarditis. Of that cohort, Bhakdi says, we can expect up to 50% to die within the next 10 years. "[T]hey looked at al the literature, all the evidence" and for most conditions possibly caused by the COVID injections, "they were not completely sure and the data are still not sufficient," Bhakdi says of the National Academies injection analysis. He notes that "For myocarditis, [they said it's] now established that the myocarditis comes from the vaccination...And they wrote that further scientific investigation will not lead to any other conclusion." This means that "any myocarditis that anyone sees in the world following vaccination is known now to be due to the vaccine," Bhakdi adds. He goes on to highlight the paper published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, saying that the team, made of Thai researchers working in Thailand, "used [modern medical] techniques to see what the incidence was of myocarditis in young people, and the results were completely clear: incidence was something in the range of...1 to 2%." One percent means if you "vaccinate" 1,000,000 people, 10,000 are going to get myocarditis," Bhakdi notes. He adds that myocarditis is a "slow killer" that will wipe out 20 to 50% of those affected by it within a decade. He notes the injections have doubtlessly "shortened the lifespan of [affected children] by decades." "[T]his is murder," Bhakdi says.
6:16

In light of The Telegraph now admitting that the Covid injections "can cause heart damage," here's Sucharit Bhakdi—in April 2024—noting that out of every 1 million Covid-jab recipients, ~10,000 will get myocarditis. Of those, ~20-50% will die within 10 years. The retired Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and former Chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, describes for Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson (Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson) how the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine—a congressionally chartered organization that serves as the collective scientific national academy of the United States—has confirmed that both Pfizer and Moderna's COVID injections cause myocarditis. Estimating the rate of myocarditis post COVID injection based on a study published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease in 2022, Bhakdi says it's likely that one to two percent of injection recipients will develop the heart condition. Meaning out of every 1,000,000 injection recipients, up to 20,000 will develop myocarditis. Of that cohort, Bhakdi says, we can expect up to 50% to die within the next 10 years. "[T]hey looked at al the literature, all the evidence" and for most conditions possibly caused by the COVID injections, "they were not completely sure and the data are still not sufficient," Bhakdi says of the National Academies injection analysis. He notes that "For myocarditis, [they said it's] now established that the myocarditis comes from the vaccination...And they wrote that further scientific investigation will not lead to any other conclusion." This means that "any myocarditis that anyone sees in the world following vaccination is known now to be due to the vaccine," Bhakdi adds. He goes on to highlight the paper published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, saying that the team, made of Thai researchers working in Thailand, "used [modern medical] techniques to see what the incidence was of myocarditis in young people, and the results were completely clear: incidence was something in the range of...1 to 2%." One percent means if you "vaccinate" 1,000,000 people, 10,000 are going to get myocarditis," Bhakdi notes. He adds that myocarditis is a "slow killer" that will wipe out 20 to 50% of those affected by it within a decade. He notes the injections have doubtlessly "shortened the lifespan of [affected children] by decades." "[T]his is murder," Bhakdi says.

Sense Receptor

42,290 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

1986: The year that fundamentally changed the landscape of childhood vaccines in America. A deep dive into the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Under Ronald Reagan, vaccine manufacturers made an unprecedented move. They told Congress they would stop producing vaccines altogether unless they were granted immunity from all liability. Parents were beginning to sue over children injured by vaccines, and the industry demanded protection. What does this "liability shield" mean in practice? Imagine a faulty car seat causes harm to a child. The manufacturer can be sued for damages. But if a child is injured or killed by a vaccine, that same legal recourse is gone. The manufacturer is untouchable. So, what replaced it? A system funded by a $0.75 tax on every vial of vaccine. This fund is tied to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System). Parents must file a VAERS report (a system with known, drastic underreporting) and then plead their case in a special "vaccine court" for a limited settlement. The result? The only consumer product in the U.S. with zero liability for its makers. Here’s the critical twist: Once the liability vanished in 1986, the childhood vaccine schedule began to explode. It jumped from a handful of shots to the current schedule of up to 72 doses by age 18. Simultaneously, the requirement for comprehensive safety studies for this new, crowded schedule evaporated. There are no studies demonstrating the safety of administering so many vaccines in combination, often as multi-dose shots. The tetanus shot is rarely just a tetanus shot. It's a package deal. The 1986 deal removed accountability and opened the floodgates. The question remains: Who truly bears the risk when a product's makers are immune from lawsuit?
2:38

1986: The year that fundamentally changed the landscape of childhood vaccines in America. A deep dive into the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Under Ronald Reagan, vaccine manufacturers made an unprecedented move. They told Congress they would stop producing vaccines altogether unless they were granted immunity from all liability. Parents were beginning to sue over children injured by vaccines, and the industry demanded protection. What does this "liability shield" mean in practice? Imagine a faulty car seat causes harm to a child. The manufacturer can be sued for damages. But if a child is injured or killed by a vaccine, that same legal recourse is gone. The manufacturer is untouchable. So, what replaced it? A system funded by a $0.75 tax on every vial of vaccine. This fund is tied to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System). Parents must file a VAERS report (a system with known, drastic underreporting) and then plead their case in a special "vaccine court" for a limited settlement. The result? The only consumer product in the U.S. with zero liability for its makers. Here’s the critical twist: Once the liability vanished in 1986, the childhood vaccine schedule began to explode. It jumped from a handful of shots to the current schedule of up to 72 doses by age 18. Simultaneously, the requirement for comprehensive safety studies for this new, crowded schedule evaporated. There are no studies demonstrating the safety of administering so many vaccines in combination, often as multi-dose shots. The tetanus shot is rarely just a tetanus shot. It's a package deal. The 1986 deal removed accountability and opened the floodgates. The question remains: Who truly bears the risk when a product's makers are immune from lawsuit?

Camus

37,323 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: A chilling revelation about the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. According to Dr. Bhakdi, the experimental nature of the COVID-19 vaccinations was intentional from the very beginning. He cites a Robert Koch Institute protocol which allegedly stated that multiple vaccines would be developed and tested in a rapid process, indicating everything was pre-planned. He asserts that proper pre-market testing was impossible, pointing out that BioNTech does not even possess an experimental animal facility to conduct mandatory safety and efficacy studies. The clinical trials were therefore fundamentally inadequate. The damning proof, he notes, is in the official documents themselves: "Relevant data will only be raised post-marketing." This seven-word sentence admits that the global population was to be the test subject for collecting crucial safety data. Dr. Bhakdi highlights a peer-reviewed publication from the lab of MWGFD, revealing the vaccines are contaminated with bacterial DNA. This DNA is packaged alongside the mRNA and is efficiently absorbed into human cells. Within hours, our cells are hijacked to produce the foreign spike protein, and this production continues for days, potentially months. The uptake of this functioning foreign gene is, by definition, a genetic modification of the cell. His conclusion is stark: "The vaccinated have become genetically modified organisms." This unauthorized genetic alteration, conducted without informed consent on a global scale, is not just negligent. Dr. Bhakdi states unequivocally: "That's criminal. That's a capital crime." This was not a vaccination program. It was an unprecedented genetic experiment.
2:45

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: A chilling revelation about the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. According to Dr. Bhakdi, the experimental nature of the COVID-19 vaccinations was intentional from the very beginning. He cites a Robert Koch Institute protocol which allegedly stated that multiple vaccines would be developed and tested in a rapid process, indicating everything was pre-planned. He asserts that proper pre-market testing was impossible, pointing out that BioNTech does not even possess an experimental animal facility to conduct mandatory safety and efficacy studies. The clinical trials were therefore fundamentally inadequate. The damning proof, he notes, is in the official documents themselves: "Relevant data will only be raised post-marketing." This seven-word sentence admits that the global population was to be the test subject for collecting crucial safety data. Dr. Bhakdi highlights a peer-reviewed publication from the lab of MWGFD, revealing the vaccines are contaminated with bacterial DNA. This DNA is packaged alongside the mRNA and is efficiently absorbed into human cells. Within hours, our cells are hijacked to produce the foreign spike protein, and this production continues for days, potentially months. The uptake of this functioning foreign gene is, by definition, a genetic modification of the cell. His conclusion is stark: "The vaccinated have become genetically modified organisms." This unauthorized genetic alteration, conducted without informed consent on a global scale, is not just negligent. Dr. Bhakdi states unequivocally: "That's criminal. That's a capital crime." This was not a vaccination program. It was an unprecedented genetic experiment.

Camus

104,791 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨 MUST-WATCH: Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi drops devastating new evidence on mRNA vaccine contamination, turbo cancer, fraud at BioNTech, and the “Vaccine Mafia” that silenced warnings from the start. In this explosive interview with Marc Friedrich, the world-renowned microbiologist reveals what authorities knew and why the burden of proof has now flipped. Full interview (German): The truth is coming out. marc friedrich A Thread🧵
0:47

🚨 MUST-WATCH: Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi drops devastating new evidence on mRNA vaccine contamination, turbo cancer, fraud at BioNTech, and the “Vaccine Mafia” that silenced warnings from the start. In this explosive interview with Marc Friedrich, the world-renowned microbiologist reveals what authorities knew and why the burden of proof has now flipped. Full interview (German): The truth is coming out. marc friedrich A Thread🧵

Kenny Carmody

12,833 просмотров • 16 дней назад

Title: Dr. Bhakdi on Unnecessary Vaccinations: "Extremely Contagious AND Dangerous Diseases Do Not Exist" A paradigm shift in how we view vaccination is long overdue. Renowned microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi delivers it with stunning clarity. He reveals the three non-negotiable pillars that MUST support every vaccination recommendation. The absence of just one invalidates the entire premise. 1️⃣ Necessity: Is the disease truly life-threatening? For most modern infectious diseases, including measles, the answer is a resounding NO. With proper care (like antibiotics for secondary infections), mortality is virtually zero. The first pillar crumbles. 2️⃣ Effectiveness: If a disease is dangerous, the vaccine must be proven effective. Without rigorous, long-term proof of efficacy, the second pillar is absent. 3️⃣ Safety: The vaccine's risks must be vanishingly small compared to its benefits. The risk-benefit ratio must be overwhelmingly positive. Dr. Bhakdi dismantles the fear narrative, stating: "Extremely contagious and extremely dangerous infectious diseases... do not exist." This is a fundamental rule of infectology. Pathogens that kill their hosts too quickly cannot spread effectively. Furthermore, he argues that our immune systems need the natural confrontation with common pathogens. This interaction is a normal, evolutionary symbiosis that has shaped our biology. The push to eradicate every virus is not just misguided—it's "stupid and stupid," ignoring the essential role these challenges play in a robust immune system. This thread is a summary of Dr. Bhakdi's critical insights. His new work promises a detailed, disease-by-disease analysis based on these three pillars, starting with measles, mumps, and rubella. This is essential knowledge for anyone seeking a critical, scientific perspective beyond the mainstream narrative.
3:46

Title: Dr. Bhakdi on Unnecessary Vaccinations: "Extremely Contagious AND Dangerous Diseases Do Not Exist" A paradigm shift in how we view vaccination is long overdue. Renowned microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi delivers it with stunning clarity. He reveals the three non-negotiable pillars that MUST support every vaccination recommendation. The absence of just one invalidates the entire premise. 1️⃣ Necessity: Is the disease truly life-threatening? For most modern infectious diseases, including measles, the answer is a resounding NO. With proper care (like antibiotics for secondary infections), mortality is virtually zero. The first pillar crumbles. 2️⃣ Effectiveness: If a disease is dangerous, the vaccine must be proven effective. Without rigorous, long-term proof of efficacy, the second pillar is absent. 3️⃣ Safety: The vaccine's risks must be vanishingly small compared to its benefits. The risk-benefit ratio must be overwhelmingly positive. Dr. Bhakdi dismantles the fear narrative, stating: "Extremely contagious and extremely dangerous infectious diseases... do not exist." This is a fundamental rule of infectology. Pathogens that kill their hosts too quickly cannot spread effectively. Furthermore, he argues that our immune systems need the natural confrontation with common pathogens. This interaction is a normal, evolutionary symbiosis that has shaped our biology. The push to eradicate every virus is not just misguided—it's "stupid and stupid," ignoring the essential role these challenges play in a robust immune system. This thread is a summary of Dr. Bhakdi's critical insights. His new work promises a detailed, disease-by-disease analysis based on these three pillars, starting with measles, mumps, and rubella. This is essential knowledge for anyone seeking a critical, scientific perspective beyond the mainstream narrative.

Camus

45,287 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Landmark Court Ruling Paves Way for LAWSUITS Against COVID “Vaccine” Manufacturers The COVID “vaccines” aren’t vaccines after all, according to a ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Dr. David Martin says that this opens the door for sweeping lawsuits because the manufacturers “willfully misled the public.” “The manufacturers willfully misled the public by calling them [COVID shots] a vaccine.” This is a violation of the Federal Trade Commission acts in the U.S. and the Deceptive Medical Practices Act internationally, he emphasized. But the implications go even further. According to Dr. Martin, the decision also cracks the liability shields that have protected various entities involved in mandating and administrating the mRNA injections. “What this also does is [it] starts to give us the cracks that we need to pierce the liability shields against vaccine manufacturers and against the individuals, employers, pharmacists, doctors, nurses, hospitals that actually injected people for the first time. We actually now have the ability to say that the 9th Circuit has held that Jacobson was misapplied, that this did not stop infection, did not stop transmission, and as such, the public was willfully misled, which is a crime.” See pinned post on this page for full interview. (Starts at 6-minute mark)
3:51

Landmark Court Ruling Paves Way for LAWSUITS Against COVID “Vaccine” Manufacturers The COVID “vaccines” aren’t vaccines after all, according to a ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Dr. David Martin says that this opens the door for sweeping lawsuits because the manufacturers “willfully misled the public.” “The manufacturers willfully misled the public by calling them [COVID shots] a vaccine.” This is a violation of the Federal Trade Commission acts in the U.S. and the Deceptive Medical Practices Act internationally, he emphasized. But the implications go even further. According to Dr. Martin, the decision also cracks the liability shields that have protected various entities involved in mandating and administrating the mRNA injections. “What this also does is [it] starts to give us the cracks that we need to pierce the liability shields against vaccine manufacturers and against the individuals, employers, pharmacists, doctors, nurses, hospitals that actually injected people for the first time. We actually now have the ability to say that the 9th Circuit has held that Jacobson was misapplied, that this did not stop infection, did not stop transmission, and as such, the public was willfully misled, which is a crime.” See pinned post on this page for full interview. (Starts at 6-minute mark)

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

192,476 просмотров • 2 лет назад

In a stunning segment, Dr. Marty Makary laid bare the catastrophic risk-benefit failure of the COVID-19 vaccine for young people. The damning evidence, long suppressed, is now being acknowledged at the highest levels. The central, chilling statistic: For young healthy boys, the risk of vaccine-induced myocarditis is a staggering 1 in 2,600. But the context is even more horrifying. When weighed against the benefits, the numbers reveal an unforgivable medical miscalculation. According to UK data (as US counting directives were relaxed), the "Number Needed to Vaccinate" (NNTV) to prevent a single COVID hospitalization is: • 113,700 for 15-19 year-olds • 102,900 for 20-24 year-olds Do the math. To prevent one hospitalization, you would administer over 100,000 vaccines, causing 39-44 cases of myocarditis (heart muscle death) in the process. The conclusion is inescapable and was finally stated plainly: The vaccine is causing more harm than the disease itself for young, healthy demographics. This isn't a fringe theory anymore. It's a admission from within the system. The head of the FDA is now questioning the "follow the science" mantra that has been used to mandate these shots for children and infants, asking the pivotal question: "What science?" This is a vindication for those who were maligned for asking these very questions. But it is also a profound tragedy—a testament to the "level of ineptitude and bias that has destroyed so many lives." The rubber-stamping of boosters without updated trials is over. The reckoning has begun.
3:31

In a stunning segment, Dr. Marty Makary laid bare the catastrophic risk-benefit failure of the COVID-19 vaccine for young people. The damning evidence, long suppressed, is now being acknowledged at the highest levels. The central, chilling statistic: For young healthy boys, the risk of vaccine-induced myocarditis is a staggering 1 in 2,600. But the context is even more horrifying. When weighed against the benefits, the numbers reveal an unforgivable medical miscalculation. According to UK data (as US counting directives were relaxed), the "Number Needed to Vaccinate" (NNTV) to prevent a single COVID hospitalization is: • 113,700 for 15-19 year-olds • 102,900 for 20-24 year-olds Do the math. To prevent one hospitalization, you would administer over 100,000 vaccines, causing 39-44 cases of myocarditis (heart muscle death) in the process. The conclusion is inescapable and was finally stated plainly: The vaccine is causing more harm than the disease itself for young, healthy demographics. This isn't a fringe theory anymore. It's a admission from within the system. The head of the FDA is now questioning the "follow the science" mantra that has been used to mandate these shots for children and infants, asking the pivotal question: "What science?" This is a vindication for those who were maligned for asking these very questions. But it is also a profound tragedy—a testament to the "level of ineptitude and bias that has destroyed so many lives." The rubber-stamping of boosters without updated trials is over. The reckoning has begun.

Camus

147,434 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

A chilling and damning testimony from renowned microbiology professor, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi. He presents the post-mortem evidence of a 77-year-old man who died from unknown causes following a third COVID-19 vaccine injection. The investigation revealed a myocardium littered with microscopic scars—"islands of dead cells." Dr. Bhakdi explains the mechanism: the vaccine, injected into the blood, caused vascular leakiness, allowing the contents to seep into and attack the heart muscle. Crucially, these devastating scars were invisible without a microscopic examination of the heart itself. Even the seemingly "normal" areas of muscle were found to contain dead and dying cells. This is not an isolated case, but a published finding available for the world to see. His conclusion is a stark warning: this is criminal madness. He calls for an immediate halt to the policies of the Biden administration, FDA, CDC, and WHO, whom he accuses of killing millions, with billions potentially at risk. The urgency is amplified by the global push to introduce mRNA technology into vaccines for everything: measles, mumps, hepatitis, and flu. The stakes could not be higher. The evidence is on the table. The question remains: when will the world listen?
2:56

A chilling and damning testimony from renowned microbiology professor, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi. He presents the post-mortem evidence of a 77-year-old man who died from unknown causes following a third COVID-19 vaccine injection. The investigation revealed a myocardium littered with microscopic scars—"islands of dead cells." Dr. Bhakdi explains the mechanism: the vaccine, injected into the blood, caused vascular leakiness, allowing the contents to seep into and attack the heart muscle. Crucially, these devastating scars were invisible without a microscopic examination of the heart itself. Even the seemingly "normal" areas of muscle were found to contain dead and dying cells. This is not an isolated case, but a published finding available for the world to see. His conclusion is a stark warning: this is criminal madness. He calls for an immediate halt to the policies of the Biden administration, FDA, CDC, and WHO, whom he accuses of killing millions, with billions potentially at risk. The urgency is amplified by the global push to introduce mRNA technology into vaccines for everything: measles, mumps, hepatitis, and flu. The stakes could not be higher. The evidence is on the table. The question remains: when will the world listen?

Camus

105,716 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

RFK Jr. has the full power to halt deadly mRNA vaccines right now. He needs nobody else’s permission or approval. Yet he refuses to do so. Why? In this powerful video clip, Sasha Latypova explains that RFK Jr. has “almost unlimited power” concerning vaccines and needs no congressional approval at all. He can write a memo and stop the EUA jabs tomorrow. And he can halt the liability protection for vaccine manufacturers who are currently protected under the PREP Act. But he isn’t doing this at all. So far, he is continuing the mRNA harm, injury and death across America.
2:25

RFK Jr. has the full power to halt deadly mRNA vaccines right now. He needs nobody else’s permission or approval. Yet he refuses to do so. Why? In this powerful video clip, Sasha Latypova explains that RFK Jr. has “almost unlimited power” concerning vaccines and needs no congressional approval at all. He can write a memo and stop the EUA jabs tomorrow. And he can halt the liability protection for vaccine manufacturers who are currently protected under the PREP Act. But he isn’t doing this at all. So far, he is continuing the mRNA harm, injury and death across America.

HealthRanger

66,050 просмотров • 1 год назад

This is *the only realistic way* to get the COVID injections pulled. HHS Secretary RFK Jr. (Secretary Kennedy) must revoke the PREP Act liability shield for the jabs—and he can do that NOW, *UNILATERALLY* If he does not, he becomes complicit in "mass murder" (his quote) (A 🧵, 1/11) In this open letter recently posted by Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art"), the retired pharma R&D executive calls on RFK Jr. to "use [his] authority to immediately terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration for the covid pandemic, as there is no such emergency in reality." She notes, "All mRNA injections marketed as covid vaccines today are Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) Military Countermeasures." Latypova adds that the COVID injections are being given to babies as the jabs are now on the CDC's immunization schedule, and that this means, in effect, that it's RFK Jr.'s opinion—by default—that this is an acceptable practice. The retired pharma R&D executive goes on to say that the COVID injections constitute "the greatest human tragedy in recorded history" and have also "destroyed public trust in the government['s] health agencies." Approximate transcription of Latypova's remarks in this clip: "Secretary Kennedy, "All mRNA injections marketed as covid vaccines today are Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) Military Countermeasures. The EUA pathway is used only when the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services declares an emergency and issues a PREP Act declaration. Section 564 of the Food and Drugs and Cosmetics Act exempts medical countermeasures from the pharmaceutical regulatory compliance or from the informed consent requirements for the duration of the PREP Act declaration of emergency. While the manufacturers may choose and FDA may ask to undertake some of the activities typically expected from an investigational clinical trial and manufacturing validation process, none of the typical pharmaceutical regulatory standards are applicable in an enforceable way. "If there is no enforcement of the law, it’s as if the law doesn't exist. Misrepresentations of safety, efficacy or contents of EUA products are allowed by federal law. Thus, claims provided by the federal health authorities or manufacturers cannot be considered reliable sources of information. When these products are pushed onto unsuspecting consumers, claims about safety, efficacy or contents of these products are based solely on the HHS Secretary’s opinion, which requires no supporting scientific evidence. Today, three mRNA shots are listed on the CDC Childhood Vaccination Schedule to be given to 9 months old infants. Secretary Kennedy, are we supposed to think that it is now YOUR opinion that they are safe and effective for babies? I do not believe that, knowing what you know about mRNA injections, you can honestly believe this yourself. Current PREP Act emergency declaration [for covid] was extended by the previous administration by Xavier Becerra and it's now supposed to last until December 31, 2029! "Real emergencies do not last decades simply based on the opinion of a single public health official. There is no real emergency for covid in the United Sates or worldwide as you are well aware. Continued PREP Act declarations, therefore, defy the observed reality and common sense, and represents a misuse and abuse of the federal law which was intended for declaring short-term emergencies in severe situations such as war or acts of terrorism. This law also did not envision shipping of billions of doses of medical products legally allowed to be adulterated and misbranded. Yet, this is precisely what is transpiring under the current PREP Act declaration today. "By keeping the PREP Act declaration in place, the current administration continues to contrive a non-existing emergency. This contrivance serves only the interests of pharmaceutical companies and those institutions that still mandate the shots, shielding them from liability for deaths and injuries caused by the falsely promoted inherently unsafe products. Clearly, this contrivance does not serve the interests of the public at all. The continued disregard of the victims of the covid shots under the thorough liability shield of the PREP Act abuses the federal law and destroys any remaining shreds of the public trust in the government health authorities. These products pose severe risk of harm and death to the public due to the absence of any enforceable pharmaceutical regulations. "The FDA and manufacturers falsely claim that these products are fully approved for age 12 and older as prophylactic vaccines. However, once someone is injured by these vaccines and seeks compensation for their injuries, they are informed that the products are not legally vaccines but countermeasures, and the only avenue available to them is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program. "To date this program has denied almost all claims and paid only a few thousand dollars to a handful of victims, making a mockery of them and the unbearable toll of their permanently destroyed health. During your Congressional confirmation hearings you said that a healthy person has a thousand dreams while a sick person has only one dream. Were you sincere about helping the covid vaccine victims? Secretary Kennedy, I respectfully ask you to: "Please use your authority to immediately terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration for covid pandemic, as there is no such emergency in reality. "Please also investigate the misuse and abuse of the federal law utilized in the so-called 'pandemic response' and countermeasures that resulted in the greatest human tragedy in recorded history and also destroyed public trust in the government health agencies."
5:01

This is *the only realistic way* to get the COVID injections pulled. HHS Secretary RFK Jr. (Secretary Kennedy) must revoke the PREP Act liability shield for the jabs—and he can do that NOW, *UNILATERALLY* If he does not, he becomes complicit in "mass murder" (his quote) (A 🧵, 1/11) In this open letter recently posted by Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art"), the retired pharma R&D executive calls on RFK Jr. to "use [his] authority to immediately terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration for the covid pandemic, as there is no such emergency in reality." She notes, "All mRNA injections marketed as covid vaccines today are Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) Military Countermeasures." Latypova adds that the COVID injections are being given to babies as the jabs are now on the CDC's immunization schedule, and that this means, in effect, that it's RFK Jr.'s opinion—by default—that this is an acceptable practice. The retired pharma R&D executive goes on to say that the COVID injections constitute "the greatest human tragedy in recorded history" and have also "destroyed public trust in the government['s] health agencies." Approximate transcription of Latypova's remarks in this clip: "Secretary Kennedy, "All mRNA injections marketed as covid vaccines today are Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) Military Countermeasures. The EUA pathway is used only when the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services declares an emergency and issues a PREP Act declaration. Section 564 of the Food and Drugs and Cosmetics Act exempts medical countermeasures from the pharmaceutical regulatory compliance or from the informed consent requirements for the duration of the PREP Act declaration of emergency. While the manufacturers may choose and FDA may ask to undertake some of the activities typically expected from an investigational clinical trial and manufacturing validation process, none of the typical pharmaceutical regulatory standards are applicable in an enforceable way. "If there is no enforcement of the law, it’s as if the law doesn't exist. Misrepresentations of safety, efficacy or contents of EUA products are allowed by federal law. Thus, claims provided by the federal health authorities or manufacturers cannot be considered reliable sources of information. When these products are pushed onto unsuspecting consumers, claims about safety, efficacy or contents of these products are based solely on the HHS Secretary’s opinion, which requires no supporting scientific evidence. Today, three mRNA shots are listed on the CDC Childhood Vaccination Schedule to be given to 9 months old infants. Secretary Kennedy, are we supposed to think that it is now YOUR opinion that they are safe and effective for babies? I do not believe that, knowing what you know about mRNA injections, you can honestly believe this yourself. Current PREP Act emergency declaration [for covid] was extended by the previous administration by Xavier Becerra and it's now supposed to last until December 31, 2029! "Real emergencies do not last decades simply based on the opinion of a single public health official. There is no real emergency for covid in the United Sates or worldwide as you are well aware. Continued PREP Act declarations, therefore, defy the observed reality and common sense, and represents a misuse and abuse of the federal law which was intended for declaring short-term emergencies in severe situations such as war or acts of terrorism. This law also did not envision shipping of billions of doses of medical products legally allowed to be adulterated and misbranded. Yet, this is precisely what is transpiring under the current PREP Act declaration today. "By keeping the PREP Act declaration in place, the current administration continues to contrive a non-existing emergency. This contrivance serves only the interests of pharmaceutical companies and those institutions that still mandate the shots, shielding them from liability for deaths and injuries caused by the falsely promoted inherently unsafe products. Clearly, this contrivance does not serve the interests of the public at all. The continued disregard of the victims of the covid shots under the thorough liability shield of the PREP Act abuses the federal law and destroys any remaining shreds of the public trust in the government health authorities. These products pose severe risk of harm and death to the public due to the absence of any enforceable pharmaceutical regulations. "The FDA and manufacturers falsely claim that these products are fully approved for age 12 and older as prophylactic vaccines. However, once someone is injured by these vaccines and seeks compensation for their injuries, they are informed that the products are not legally vaccines but countermeasures, and the only avenue available to them is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program. "To date this program has denied almost all claims and paid only a few thousand dollars to a handful of victims, making a mockery of them and the unbearable toll of their permanently destroyed health. During your Congressional confirmation hearings you said that a healthy person has a thousand dreams while a sick person has only one dream. Were you sincere about helping the covid vaccine victims? Secretary Kennedy, I respectfully ask you to: "Please use your authority to immediately terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration for covid pandemic, as there is no such emergency in reality. "Please also investigate the misuse and abuse of the federal law utilized in the so-called 'pandemic response' and countermeasures that resulted in the greatest human tragedy in recorded history and also destroyed public trust in the government health agencies."

Sense Receptor

135,889 просмотров • 1 год назад

The Dignity Act would grant legal status to a segment of the illegal population that meets certain criteria such as: - Not having committed a crime in the United States as well as in their country of origin. - They cannot collect government benefits. Period. - They must pay all back taxes and a fine for coming into the United States illegally. If this criteria is not met, that is grounds for deportation.
1:02

The Dignity Act would grant legal status to a segment of the illegal population that meets certain criteria such as: - Not having committed a crime in the United States as well as in their country of origin. - They cannot collect government benefits. Period. - They must pay all back taxes and a fine for coming into the United States illegally. If this criteria is not met, that is grounds for deportation.

Mike Lawler

540,480 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Renowned microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi presents a devastating critique of modern vaccination policy, based on three non-negotiable scientific pillars. He argues that for any vaccination to be justified, it must rest on: 1. NECESSITY (only for truly life-threatening diseases), 2. EFFECTIVENESS (robustly proven), and 3. SAFETY (a risk-benefit ratio that is clearly bearable). Applying this framework, he dismantles common narratives. Using measles as an example, he states the necessity pillar fails: "The measles are not dangerous enough." Historical deaths were due to bacterial complications, and with antibiotics, "no one will die from the measles anymore, really none." The push for eradication is termed "stupid and foolish." He introduces a profound biological truth: our immune system requires confrontation with pathogens. This interaction is a normal, evolutionary symbiosis. Truly dangerous diseases that are also extremely contagious are a myth—a fact that makes the COVID-19 narrative immediately suspect to any expert in infectology. This is not an opinion; it's a rigorous scientific standard that, according to Bhakdi, much of modern medicine ignores.
3:46

Renowned microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi presents a devastating critique of modern vaccination policy, based on three non-negotiable scientific pillars. He argues that for any vaccination to be justified, it must rest on: 1. NECESSITY (only for truly life-threatening diseases), 2. EFFECTIVENESS (robustly proven), and 3. SAFETY (a risk-benefit ratio that is clearly bearable). Applying this framework, he dismantles common narratives. Using measles as an example, he states the necessity pillar fails: "The measles are not dangerous enough." Historical deaths were due to bacterial complications, and with antibiotics, "no one will die from the measles anymore, really none." The push for eradication is termed "stupid and foolish." He introduces a profound biological truth: our immune system requires confrontation with pathogens. This interaction is a normal, evolutionary symbiosis. Truly dangerous diseases that are also extremely contagious are a myth—a fact that makes the COVID-19 narrative immediately suspect to any expert in infectology. This is not an opinion; it's a rigorous scientific standard that, according to Bhakdi, much of modern medicine ignores.

Camus

48,950 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: "Our key message to the world must be that the WHO is on the verge of procuring the right and the power of genetically modifying humans at will." "This should awaken those who are still asleep and convince them to join us in our endeavor to counter this satanic agenda. Bless you all for your selfless commitment to the welfare of mankind."
0:33

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: "Our key message to the world must be that the WHO is on the verge of procuring the right and the power of genetically modifying humans at will." "This should awaken those who are still asleep and convince them to join us in our endeavor to counter this satanic agenda. Bless you all for your selfless commitment to the welfare of mankind."

Camus

42,335 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад