Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Rep Eric Burlison has received testimony of egg shaped craft that make people who enter lose time He still wants to see it for himself “A lot of the people that have talked about interacting with these egg shaped craft in our possession, I want to see the craft.... show more
203,454 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)
0 Comments
No comments available
Comments from the original post will appear here
![Bob Lazar allegedly watched people fly a UFO at Area 51. “They knew how to fly it.” “The craft had a corona discharge glow on the bottom and lifted off silently up into the sky … ” And it had one shocking, anomalous effect that still perplexes him to this day: As Lazar watched, his supervisor Dennis Mariani told him to go stand directly underneath the craft. “I walked out underneath it and … I looked up, and I couldn’t see the craft.” “I thought it flew away.” “Then he said to come back, and I walked back.” “I see the edge of the craft.” “If you move, you can see it, and if you walk underneath it, you can’t.” “So you can clearly see it’s bending the light.” “You can see the sky above the craft, so you can see that it’s in its little envelope.” Lazar was also convinced that someone was actually inside the craft as it flew. “I did notice there was a … VHF radio.” “And they’re in communication.” “It made me almost positive that there was somebody in the craft.” He heard a voice coming “from the VHF radio, but presumably coming from the craft.” “They must have had some instrumentation set up in the craft, because he was monitoring something.” “I was stuck on the fact that, how is a radio wave of getting into the craft?” “This doesn’t even make any sense.” “It should be distorted by the gravity wave going around it.” “Clearly, they’ve had a lot of time with this craft already.” “It could have been decades for all I know.” “They knew how to fly it.” “These guys were somewhat proficient with it.” Jesse Michels asked Lazar if that means that we actually have “alien reproduction vehicles, or UFOs that humans can fly?” Lazar: “I do not think so, no.” Michels: “So you think we can test these things and use them in rudimentary ways, but we don’t understand how they work?” Lazar: “It’s like the analogy … you can go back to the 1800s and drop off a motorcycle with the keys in it.” “If you tinker with it long enough, someone’s gonna turn the key and it’s gonna start.” “Eventually … they’ll become proficient at driving it.” “But when it runs out of fuel, we’re done.” “And … they can’t even make that plastic fender.” “I think that’s where we are [with UFOs].” “We had some knowledge of that, but I think if we had developed that technology, we would’ve absolutely already seen it.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2044820504888914237/amplify_video_thumb/2044820163837431809/img/cA3Ioaya2xve_hPi.jpg)
![🤬 Burlison: Putting Lacatski Under Oath in a Hearing Wasn't a Top Priority Because He Wouldn't Say Anything New 🤬 (I can't believe I just heard that.) Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Dr. James Lacatski came on our show. He ran the UFO program for the Defense Intelligence Agency, and he admitted on our show that they breached the hull of a UFO in government possession." Burlison at the Last Hearing: "You reported [that] James Lacatski came to you with government possession of NHI craft and how they ultimately gained entry. Can you testify to the veracity of that claim?" George Knapp at the Last Hearing: "Dr. Lacatski is an honorable man who served most of his career with the DIA. A very trusted, high-level rocket scientist and intelligence analyst who inspired the AAWSAP program, as I said earlier. He said this craft, we had managed to get inside of it. It had no wings, no rotor, no tail, it had no fuel, no fuel tanks. They didn't know how it flew or how it was operated. It clearly looked like it was aerodynamic, but he would not go further. He's a by-the-book guy, and until he gets clearance to say more about that, I don't think we're going to hear much more. "But, it's not ours. It wasn't ours. We didn't make it. We didn't know who made it and how it was built and how it operated. We've got at least one, and I don't know, I think that's enough confirmation that we do have recovered discs and material." (What is written in "Initial Revelations" about that alleged craft, and Lacatski standing by what was written when he was on "Weaponized" is one of the most important claims we've ever had in this field. I don't see it as confirmation that we have craft but we're getting closer. Lacatski saying that he saw it with his own eyes would take it up a notch, but I still wanna see it for myself, and not just in photos and videos. AI is just too good to accept that as proof.) Corbell: "So, and you put that in congressional record. Do you have a way that you can, you know, find out, where is it? He can't tell us, but maybe he can tell you? Where is that craft? Can you go hunt it down? Can you go see it?" Burlison: "You know, that's an interesting question. When it came to Lacatski - and I watched his interview that he did with you guys - and here's what my response to him is. Because he was frustrated that we hadn't reached out to him, but he also kind of, he also admitted that - which is what I was told, and the reason why we haven't reached out to him - is that he's not gonna tell us anything that's not in his books." (Most people on this planet have not read his books!) Corbell: "Well, hold on, hold on. You did reach out to him. There have been three hearings. I reached out to him on behalf of Congress, officially, twice, to say..." Burlison: "You did, that's right, you did." Corbell: "And I had congressional members talk with him the hearing before the last one. He just forgot. But the point is, is that maybe with you guys, in the correct environment, with the right clearances, he can tell you where it is, and you can just put this to bed and go find it." (I'm not against Congress talking to Lacatski in a SCIF, but, IMO, the chances that he tells members of the Secrets Task Force the location of this alleged craft are ZERO. Maybe Rubio would get an answer but he may already know. And if he (Rubio) does know, he's not telling us. At least not yet, and probably, IMO, never.) Burlison: "Yeah. And I remember that. I remember that he was one of the people that we had tasked you to go to reach out to. And for those people that are kind of asking how did that relationship work? Look, we don't have all the contact information for all these people. Why repeat the work that you two have done in building these contacts in your networks? And so, you, basically, patriotically dedicated your time, for free, helping us make contact and kind of coordinate some of those witnesses. (That was an awesome thing for Corbell and Knapp to do and it was for a great cause. The truth!) Burlison: "And I had been told Lacatski is probably not gonna reveal anything that he hasn't already revealed. When I've talked to people, it seemed like it wasn't gonna be new information. And therefore, to me, he wasn't as high of a priority." (He should have been THE priority, as far as witnesses for the hearing. With Lacatski, you have a respected rocket scientist, physicist and intelligence analyst, who has confirmed that this passage from Initial Revelations is accurate: “At the conclusion of a 2011 meeting in the Capitol building with a U.S. Senator and an agency Under Secretary, Lacatski, the only one of this book’s authors present, posed a question. He stated that the United States was in possession of a craft of unknown origin and had successfully gained access to its interior. This craft had a streamlined configuration suitable for aerodynamic flight but no intakes, exhaust, wings, or control surfaces. In fact, it appeared not to have an engine, fuel tanks, or fuel. Lacatski asked: What was the purpose of this craft? Was it a life-support craft useful only for atmospheric reentry or what? If it was a spacecraft, then how did it operate”? And, Lacatski may have seen the craft with his own eyes and entered it. But Burlison (or anybody else on the Task Force) didn't see it as a priority to bring him in, UNDER OATH, and have him repeat what is said in that book, and other important claims from the other two books, and his interviews with Knapp and Corbell? I'm shaking my head as I type this. You know what percentage of the world has read those books and/or watched the, limited, interviews Lacatski has given? Maybe 0.0000000000001% of the population? You had (and still do) a chance to get that man under oath and it wasn't a priority? WTAF? He's getting older and we don't know how much longer he will be around. If, as Rep. Andy Ogles told Matt Laslo, another hearing is coming in January, Lacatski, if he agrees, MUST be part of that. You can ask him about the craft, the alleged paranormal connection, and people getting sick and injured if they get too close to a UAP. And, he can be asked about the hitchhiker effect and claims of contagion. It doesn't matter if he won't add anything new or different than what's in his books or interviews. Put him under oath for the world to see and hear and, hopefully, the mainstream media picks up the story: Rocket Scientist: The USG Has an Otherworldly Craft in its Possession and Have Breached the Hull And maybe, if he's in a Disclosure mood, he'll offer up some surprise like he did in his last interview on Weaponized when he said we have made progress on back engineering these craft but, "it hasn't been achieved to its full extent." That's a MASSIVE claim! Push him to offer up more. And if his answers to many questions are: "It's all in my book"? Make him read from his book so the world can be informed about his claims and what was allegedly discovered in AAWSAP. David Grusch didn't say much more than what he said in his interview with Ross Coulthart and article in The Debrief, but was there ever any thought that he shouldn't have been put under oath and brought in as a witness for that congressional hearing? Of course not!) Burlison: "But to your point, I think getting him in a SCIF and seeing if there's maybe any additional room for him to talk, it might be worthwhile to do that." Knapp: "I think he might. I mean, the last conversations that we've had, it seems like he's edging closer to the idea that, under the right circumstances, he would be willing to share information with Congress, which would be great." (Again, I'm all for putting him the SCIF, too.)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1999618259063308336/amplify_video_thumb/1999591424954957824/img/RtJss2MFC_SNRr-Z.jpg)
![Jake Barber says you need to have a benevolent, or loving, attitude, if you want to "connect with it [the non-human intelligence]" or "see stuff flying in the sky." He also says he's not encountered any kind of these beings or craft that are malevolent.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1882675124475945146/ext_tw_video_thumb/1882674925913419776/pu/img/q1vKGlp_Yu5kGzbo.jpg)
