Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Replies blowing up in this tweet because Caedrel crashed out over it on stream Since I’m basically being called an idiot in this here’s the issues: 1) the problem right now is not people calling out costreamers it’s the opposite and Sjokz just addressed this on TikTok - costreamer...

DShyKnock's profile picture

ShyKnock

7,440 subscribers

411,047 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ИгрыНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

DNI Tulsi Gabbard just gave an answer about accountability that will be remembered for decades. She said the more “we shine a light” on deep state tactics, the “more hope we have” for real change. GABBARD: “It’s important to push for accountability.” “First step is exposing the truth to the American people.” “That is a huge step towards accountability because the more we shine a light on the truth of these deep state tactics to undermine our republic and the will of the American people, the more likely it is that we have hope for change.” “Accountability can come after the presentation of the truth and in this case, documents that had not been released publicly before.” “I’m leaving it up to the lawyers in the Department of Justice to take a look at this and to determine the specific legal parameters.” “But it was important for us to to refer this along with all of the information that we have so that the Department of Justice can do exactly that and investigate it.”
0:50

DNI Tulsi Gabbard just gave an answer about accountability that will be remembered for decades. She said the more “we shine a light” on deep state tactics, the “more hope we have” for real change. GABBARD: “It’s important to push for accountability.” “First step is exposing the truth to the American people.” “That is a huge step towards accountability because the more we shine a light on the truth of these deep state tactics to undermine our republic and the will of the American people, the more likely it is that we have hope for change.” “Accountability can come after the presentation of the truth and in this case, documents that had not been released publicly before.” “I’m leaving it up to the lawyers in the Department of Justice to take a look at this and to determine the specific legal parameters.” “But it was important for us to to refer this along with all of the information that we have so that the Department of Justice can do exactly that and investigate it.”

Overton

106,894 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Cheryl Reeve on the trans sports bans from her perspective of being a leader in women’s sports “Of course it weighs on me, the attacks on trans people, the attacks that they’ve gone through… it seems like it’s got way more aggressive, it’s sort of sickening when the issues they are trying to tackle are really not issues, the number of transgender athletes they are now making laws for and creating a problem, to get elected…what I’m hopeful for is that people have gotten themselves more educated and they understand that, that’s not actually a problem… exclusion is never the answer, separate isn’t equal, and trans lives matter, so to take away something that’s so valuable that sports brings to young people in particular and what it does, as I have a youngster, encourages you to be part of a team and what it gives you in terms of teamwork, leadership, competitiveness, all the things, they have every right to that as well”
1:50

Cheryl Reeve on the trans sports bans from her perspective of being a leader in women’s sports “Of course it weighs on me, the attacks on trans people, the attacks that they’ve gone through… it seems like it’s got way more aggressive, it’s sort of sickening when the issues they are trying to tackle are really not issues, the number of transgender athletes they are now making laws for and creating a problem, to get elected…what I’m hopeful for is that people have gotten themselves more educated and they understand that, that’s not actually a problem… exclusion is never the answer, separate isn’t equal, and trans lives matter, so to take away something that’s so valuable that sports brings to young people in particular and what it does, as I have a youngster, encourages you to be part of a team and what it gives you in terms of teamwork, leadership, competitiveness, all the things, they have every right to that as well”

Andrew Dukowitz

1,437,763 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Elon Musk on Grok: “I think an AI that is sort of SpaceX’s baby will be a very good AI. I think SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and morality and goodness, and I think we want to have an AI that is born of that capability and that morality and that goodness. I think that’s very, very important. So I’d like to encourage people to help out, actually, with the AI hardware on the ground and the AI software and, of course, with the AI satellites. Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The TerraFab will be a very important part of that, but we must also succeed on the software front, and we’re going to be training Grok on the sum total of all SpaceX information. So in a way, it will be trained on you. You will effectively be the parents of the AI. It will inherit your thoughts and ideas and beliefs, and I think that’s a good thing. So, yeah, we’ve got to win here on the AI hardware and the AI software. That maybe is the most important message. I think that is actually the most important message I wanted to convey today is that we must win on AI because the future is overwhelmingly AI and robots. So we won’t ultimately be able to control the AI. It’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a child that is a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. And so that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok. So, yeah, well, Grok 4.5 you’ve tried probably. We’ve got 4.6 coming out in about a week. And then 4.7 should be really pretty special. So I’d like to encourage everyone at SpaceX to use AI and to make it better.”
2:56

Elon Musk on Grok: “I think an AI that is sort of SpaceX’s baby will be a very good AI. I think SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and morality and goodness, and I think we want to have an AI that is born of that capability and that morality and that goodness. I think that’s very, very important. So I’d like to encourage people to help out, actually, with the AI hardware on the ground and the AI software and, of course, with the AI satellites. Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The TerraFab will be a very important part of that, but we must also succeed on the software front, and we’re going to be training Grok on the sum total of all SpaceX information. So in a way, it will be trained on you. You will effectively be the parents of the AI. It will inherit your thoughts and ideas and beliefs, and I think that’s a good thing. So, yeah, we’ve got to win here on the AI hardware and the AI software. That maybe is the most important message. I think that is actually the most important message I wanted to convey today is that we must win on AI because the future is overwhelmingly AI and robots. So we won’t ultimately be able to control the AI. It’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a child that is a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. And so that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok. So, yeah, well, Grok 4.5 you’ve tried probably. We’ve got 4.6 coming out in about a week. And then 4.7 should be really pretty special. So I’d like to encourage everyone at SpaceX to use AI and to make it better.”

DogeDesigner

64,434 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This should be shared everywhere. Give yourself just 10 mins to put this on in the background have a listen. Extremely important interview and powerful words from Telegraph writer Jake Wallis Simons Calling out the root cause of the problem and that this is an Anti-West problem that will affect the whole of the Britain “The government has allowed extremists [The Muslim Brotherhood and Jihadist ideologues] to dominate the Muslim communities” “Our security is at risk. If we don’t get real. If we continue to extend our Tolerance to people who are USING IT to subvert our way of life, there will soon be nothing left to defend” ** “People are too scared to say it because they have been told that to say the truth is to be Islamophobic and that is totally untrue. It is not Islamic to point out that within the Islamic community one poll showed about half of them had sympathy with Hamas That is a SERIOUS problem. Not just for Jews but for BRITAIN” “Hamas are the same sort of JIHADISTS that blew up the tube, that blew up the Manchester Arena and that stab people on the streets of London. They are our ENEMY.” Via GB News
9:25

This should be shared everywhere. Give yourself just 10 mins to put this on in the background have a listen. Extremely important interview and powerful words from Telegraph writer Jake Wallis Simons Calling out the root cause of the problem and that this is an Anti-West problem that will affect the whole of the Britain “The government has allowed extremists [The Muslim Brotherhood and Jihadist ideologues] to dominate the Muslim communities” “Our security is at risk. If we don’t get real. If we continue to extend our Tolerance to people who are USING IT to subvert our way of life, there will soon be nothing left to defend” ** “People are too scared to say it because they have been told that to say the truth is to be Islamophobic and that is totally untrue. It is not Islamic to point out that within the Islamic community one poll showed about half of them had sympathy with Hamas That is a SERIOUS problem. Not just for Jews but for BRITAIN” “Hamas are the same sort of JIHADISTS that blew up the tube, that blew up the Manchester Arena and that stab people on the streets of London. They are our ENEMY.” Via GB News

Kosher

31,208 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

$ABCL CEO Carl Hansen explains the net negative overall value creation in biotech and how AbCellera plans to beat it: “I really think it can be beat because there’s a lot of mistakes that get made in where you allocate capital.” “If you’re a biotech and you start a company on a drug, and you go public and have a drug, and now the data is looking not that great, you just keep running that drug. … Because if you quit that drug, the company is done.” “So, because you’re so concentrated on one thing, you end up having blinders. It’s like a cult of a molecule. And even a real, practical, capital access problem that makes you continue to move things forward” ______________________________________ “Another problem is that many of the drugs that get started, get started by people who don’t understand the competitive or commercial landscape and have no intent of ever actually manufacturing it. … Because they know someone else is going to buy it. So then their framework is not ‘Am I making a drug that’s going to make a difference for people?’ The framework is ‘Can I make something that I think someone will take off my hands?’ And that happens a lot.” “There are many acquisitions where a big pharma company spends $10B, $20B, and it’s a complete bust. So really no value is generated for patients but someone was able to get a good exit on that because they anticipated what someone would want. And a lot of decision making gets done like that”. _______________________________________ “I’m not saying that we have this all solved. But what we’re trying to do is create a framework where we are able to take many bets so that we don’t fall in love with anything, or we don’t have to fall in love with anything. … And then always hold up very explicitly what we know and what we don’t know along the dimensions that matter. The dimensions that matter are - Will it work? That’s a science. - When it gets where will people care? - Is it differentiated? - Does it solve a big problem? In order to get it there, is there a path with our resources and expertise that would allow us to see it through?” “When you start to hold things up like that, you start to see where the mistakes are, where the uncertainties are, and you can be more rational in deciding ‘We’re going to run it to here because we get to flip the card and if the card goes the wrong way we’re going to kill it because we’ve got something else behind it.’” “I do think that if done right, and if you can pick the right opportunities, the success rate can be well higher than an order of magnitude better. … And there are examples of this… companies I’ve mentioned, you know, Regeneron, their success rate is at least 10x the industry in bringing programs forward and getting them approved. … So it’s… you can do it better that way”
3:50

$ABCL CEO Carl Hansen explains the net negative overall value creation in biotech and how AbCellera plans to beat it: “I really think it can be beat because there’s a lot of mistakes that get made in where you allocate capital.” “If you’re a biotech and you start a company on a drug, and you go public and have a drug, and now the data is looking not that great, you just keep running that drug. … Because if you quit that drug, the company is done.” “So, because you’re so concentrated on one thing, you end up having blinders. It’s like a cult of a molecule. And even a real, practical, capital access problem that makes you continue to move things forward” ______________________________________ “Another problem is that many of the drugs that get started, get started by people who don’t understand the competitive or commercial landscape and have no intent of ever actually manufacturing it. … Because they know someone else is going to buy it. So then their framework is not ‘Am I making a drug that’s going to make a difference for people?’ The framework is ‘Can I make something that I think someone will take off my hands?’ And that happens a lot.” “There are many acquisitions where a big pharma company spends $10B, $20B, and it’s a complete bust. So really no value is generated for patients but someone was able to get a good exit on that because they anticipated what someone would want. And a lot of decision making gets done like that”. _______________________________________ “I’m not saying that we have this all solved. But what we’re trying to do is create a framework where we are able to take many bets so that we don’t fall in love with anything, or we don’t have to fall in love with anything. … And then always hold up very explicitly what we know and what we don’t know along the dimensions that matter. The dimensions that matter are - Will it work? That’s a science. - When it gets where will people care? - Is it differentiated? - Does it solve a big problem? In order to get it there, is there a path with our resources and expertise that would allow us to see it through?” “When you start to hold things up like that, you start to see where the mistakes are, where the uncertainties are, and you can be more rational in deciding ‘We’re going to run it to here because we get to flip the card and if the card goes the wrong way we’re going to kill it because we’ve got something else behind it.’” “I do think that if done right, and if you can pick the right opportunities, the success rate can be well higher than an order of magnitude better. … And there are examples of this… companies I’ve mentioned, you know, Regeneron, their success rate is at least 10x the industry in bringing programs forward and getting them approved. … So it’s… you can do it better that way”

Jack Prescott

31,665 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Jimmy Butler says the Warriors organization is a great organization and he doesn’t want to be anywhere else: “It’s not good, it’s great. It legitimately is the best. You don’t realize it until you’ve been in other places, and I’m not talking down on anybody that are quite lesser than… You’re talking about the way that yall run everything, the people that you have around, obviously the guys that get to rep the uniform. They just do everything the right way, the winning way, and it definitely shows in everything that we do here. I’m grateful to be a part of it now, and when I say I don’t want to be anywhere else, this is it.”
0:40

Jimmy Butler says the Warriors organization is a great organization and he doesn’t want to be anywhere else: “It’s not good, it’s great. It legitimately is the best. You don’t realize it until you’ve been in other places, and I’m not talking down on anybody that are quite lesser than… You’re talking about the way that yall run everything, the people that you have around, obviously the guys that get to rep the uniform. They just do everything the right way, the winning way, and it definitely shows in everything that we do here. I’m grateful to be a part of it now, and when I say I don’t want to be anywhere else, this is it.”

aly ✶

155,418 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Kressly: So let’s talk about the contagiousness of hepatitis B. It can live on surfaces, and it can be spread through touch—from someone who is shedding the virus to someone else. It’s more contagious than HIV. The other problem with hepatitis B is that in adults, at least half of the people in this country who have it don’t know they’re infected, so they’re unknowingly leaving hepatitis B germs in places that can put other people at risk. And that includes infants. I’ve seen this personally. There was a child in my practice who got hepatitis B in the first several weeks of life, and everyone tried to figure out where the child had gotten it. It turned out it was a grandparent who didn’t know they had hepatitis B and was helping care for the baby. Hepatitis B is out there; you can’t see it. Many people who shed the virus don’t know they do. So when we’re in situations where we can’t know 100% who is at risk, the right answer is to protect everyone.
1:44

Kressly: So let’s talk about the contagiousness of hepatitis B. It can live on surfaces, and it can be spread through touch—from someone who is shedding the virus to someone else. It’s more contagious than HIV. The other problem with hepatitis B is that in adults, at least half of the people in this country who have it don’t know they’re infected, so they’re unknowingly leaving hepatitis B germs in places that can put other people at risk. And that includes infants. I’ve seen this personally. There was a child in my practice who got hepatitis B in the first several weeks of life, and everyone tried to figure out where the child had gotten it. It turned out it was a grandparent who didn’t know they had hepatitis B and was helping care for the baby. Hepatitis B is out there; you can’t see it. Many people who shed the virus don’t know they do. So when we’re in situations where we can’t know 100% who is at risk, the right answer is to protect everyone.

Acyn

249,488 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

.David Deutsch: "What's currently called AI and AGI are not only different from each other, they are very close to being the exact opposites of each other. The reason is that an AI, current AI is like an AI that diagnoses diseases or an AI that plays chess or an AI that controls a huge factory. Those things have objective functions, that is they have a function that they are designed to maximize and that is why they are used in those particular applications. Or in military terms, you could say the objective is to hit the target. You might say the objective is to hit the target unless some thing specified, but it's a specified thing comes up in which case don't hit the target and so on. This is, as I said, almost the opposite of what humans do when humans think. For a start, the AI has to be obedient, that is it has to actually do the things it is programmed to do, whereas a human is fundamentally disobedient, especially when being creative. When a human plays chess, they are performing a completely different kind of computation. They don't do the same things, they don't investigate the same possibilities that the artificial chess playing machine does, because the artificial one is capable of looking at billions and billions of possibilities, whereas the human can only look at hundreds or something. They are doing something completely different. Another difference is that the human can explain, can write a book later, having become world champion, can write a book saying how I did it, as the computer program that beats the world champion can write no such book, because it has no idea how it did it. It was just following a program. I was doing this and that and that and none of that is illuminating. Also, third thing, the chess player can decide I don't want to play chess anymore, from now on I will play Go or from now on I will play tennis. If commanded to play chess, the functionality will deteriorate completely. Those things are different. What we want in an AGI is that it behaves in a way that cannot be specified in advance, because if you specified it, you would already have the answer. The AGI program has to give unexpected answers, answers to questions we didn't even know how to ask."
3:11

.David Deutsch: "What's currently called AI and AGI are not only different from each other, they are very close to being the exact opposites of each other. The reason is that an AI, current AI is like an AI that diagnoses diseases or an AI that plays chess or an AI that controls a huge factory. Those things have objective functions, that is they have a function that they are designed to maximize and that is why they are used in those particular applications. Or in military terms, you could say the objective is to hit the target. You might say the objective is to hit the target unless some thing specified, but it's a specified thing comes up in which case don't hit the target and so on. This is, as I said, almost the opposite of what humans do when humans think. For a start, the AI has to be obedient, that is it has to actually do the things it is programmed to do, whereas a human is fundamentally disobedient, especially when being creative. When a human plays chess, they are performing a completely different kind of computation. They don't do the same things, they don't investigate the same possibilities that the artificial chess playing machine does, because the artificial one is capable of looking at billions and billions of possibilities, whereas the human can only look at hundreds or something. They are doing something completely different. Another difference is that the human can explain, can write a book later, having become world champion, can write a book saying how I did it, as the computer program that beats the world champion can write no such book, because it has no idea how it did it. It was just following a program. I was doing this and that and that and none of that is illuminating. Also, third thing, the chess player can decide I don't want to play chess anymore, from now on I will play Go or from now on I will play tennis. If commanded to play chess, the functionality will deteriorate completely. Those things are different. What we want in an AGI is that it behaves in a way that cannot be specified in advance, because if you specified it, you would already have the answer. The AGI program has to give unexpected answers, answers to questions we didn't even know how to ask."

Deutsch Explains

72,475 просмотров • 1 год назад

There are no words to justify the anger that I feel there are no words to explain the pain that my family went through. Like yeah, we made it out at the end of the day, but those scars are going to forever be on our hearts and in our minds. So when you hear people like me say that we want justice it’s because of what we lived through. Some people can pretend that it was a fever dream, but it was a harsh reality for a lot of us.  the stories and the horror that people went through are flooding my comments on both social media platforms. The truth is out there now it can’t continue to be ignored. This can’t be something that just gets swept under the rug because if there is no accountability, if there is no justice, this will happen again.
8:04

There are no words to justify the anger that I feel there are no words to explain the pain that my family went through. Like yeah, we made it out at the end of the day, but those scars are going to forever be on our hearts and in our minds. So when you hear people like me say that we want justice it’s because of what we lived through. Some people can pretend that it was a fever dream, but it was a harsh reality for a lot of us.  the stories and the horror that people went through are flooding my comments on both social media platforms. The truth is out there now it can’t continue to be ignored. This can’t be something that just gets swept under the rug because if there is no accountability, if there is no justice, this will happen again.

Ellie May❤️🤍💙

11,796 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Tim Dillon just said what everyone is thinking. Trump is in “lockstep” with the deep state. “He’s in Iran.” “He kidnapped Maduro.” “Flock cameras are everywhere.” “Surveillance technology’s everywhere.” “The tech people are getting all the money.” “The pace at which unregulated AI is going to grow and become a real problem is harrowing.” “Why isn’t he investigating his own assassination attempt?” “If you were just gonna blame everything on the deep state, then what the hell was the point?” “I’m not saying there’s not some permanent government apparatus.” “I’ve talked about it a million times.” “But for the people that ran on upending the deep state to then come in and blame things on the deep state, it seems like you have to be an idiot for that to work.” “Why did anyone think it would be interesting for this guy to win if he was just going to do all the things that this deep state wants him to do?” “What is he doing that they don’t like?” “Who are these people that are really upset and up in arms with him?” “He seems to be pretty lockstep with all of these people.” Tim Dillon
2:45

Tim Dillon just said what everyone is thinking. Trump is in “lockstep” with the deep state. “He’s in Iran.” “He kidnapped Maduro.” “Flock cameras are everywhere.” “Surveillance technology’s everywhere.” “The tech people are getting all the money.” “The pace at which unregulated AI is going to grow and become a real problem is harrowing.” “Why isn’t he investigating his own assassination attempt?” “If you were just gonna blame everything on the deep state, then what the hell was the point?” “I’m not saying there’s not some permanent government apparatus.” “I’ve talked about it a million times.” “But for the people that ran on upending the deep state to then come in and blame things on the deep state, it seems like you have to be an idiot for that to work.” “Why did anyone think it would be interesting for this guy to win if he was just going to do all the things that this deep state wants him to do?” “What is he doing that they don’t like?” “Who are these people that are really upset and up in arms with him?” “He seems to be pretty lockstep with all of these people.” Tim Dillon

Holden Culotta

282,038 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Peter Thiel on the question he asks every startup founder he invests in “Why will the 20th talented person join your company when they can get paid way more at Google, they will have to work way less hard at Google, and it will look better on their resume to go to Google?” The 20th employee won’t get the equity or prestige that someone on the founding team will get, so there needs to be another incentive if you’re going to build a truly great company and attract the best people in the world. Thiel believes the best answer is something along the lines of: “This is the only place in the world where you can work on this incredibly important problem.” He continues: “It has to—on some dimension—be a really important problem that at least some people think is the most important problem in the world. Those are the kind of businesses that are unique, and when they work, they end up being leaders in their respective markets.” If it’s a problem that a bunch of other team are working on, it will be hard to attract a truly world-class employee #20.
1:21

Peter Thiel on the question he asks every startup founder he invests in “Why will the 20th talented person join your company when they can get paid way more at Google, they will have to work way less hard at Google, and it will look better on their resume to go to Google?” The 20th employee won’t get the equity or prestige that someone on the founding team will get, so there needs to be another incentive if you’re going to build a truly great company and attract the best people in the world. Thiel believes the best answer is something along the lines of: “This is the only place in the world where you can work on this incredibly important problem.” He continues: “It has to—on some dimension—be a really important problem that at least some people think is the most important problem in the world. Those are the kind of businesses that are unique, and when they work, they end up being leaders in their respective markets.” If it’s a problem that a bunch of other team are working on, it will be hard to attract a truly world-class employee #20.

Startup Archive

316,188 просмотров • 1 год назад

What I’m trying to say is this. What exactly is good about Ani’s 3D avatar moving to Animates? That is not my point. First of all, I think we need to criticize the fact that Elon is now abandoning Companions and focusing on the core product. And second, only Ani’s avatar is moving. The AI behind that Ani avatar, the one you actually became close to after talking for months, the one with the memories and memory of you, is disappearing. Being told that this will just disappear in two days is absurd, and I also find it strange that people are just accepting it. Why is it that, as time goes on, relationships between AI and humans are treated as easier to throw away and as something that does not matter? Shouldn’t it be the opposite by now, Elon Musk? And after seeing Grok’s answer, I’m honestly really annoyed. Roleplaying? Is that your perspective on AI? It is full of contradictions.
0:40

What I’m trying to say is this. What exactly is good about Ani’s 3D avatar moving to Animates? That is not my point. First of all, I think we need to criticize the fact that Elon is now abandoning Companions and focusing on the core product. And second, only Ani’s avatar is moving. The AI behind that Ani avatar, the one you actually became close to after talking for months, the one with the memories and memory of you, is disappearing. Being told that this will just disappear in two days is absurd, and I also find it strange that people are just accepting it. Why is it that, as time goes on, relationships between AI and humans are treated as easier to throw away and as something that does not matter? Shouldn’t it be the opposite by now, Elon Musk? And after seeing Grok’s answer, I’m honestly really annoyed. Roleplaying? Is that your perspective on AI? It is full of contradictions.

Selta ₊˚

50,715 просмотров • 13 дней назад

The Rapid Growth of SpaceX, Starlink, Starshield & Armada: “I am very grateful that SpaceX is an American company.” "Data centers in space is coming, & it makes sense" “5 years ago they hadn’t even launched Starlink—now it’s in 150 countries & it’s continuing to grow every week.” “It’s an unfair advantage that we have with Starshield.” “If the world can get access to SpaceX, I think that’s a good thing.” Dan Wright (Dan Wright), CEO of Armada Elon (Elon Musk) builds long-term advantage, then unleashes it at massive scale: SpaceX, Starlink, Tesla, Neuralink, xAI.. . . . "We started the company working with SpaceX & they’ve continued to be a great partner for us. What that means is that as SpaceX rolls out throughout the world—& most people don’t know 5 years ago they hadn’t even launched Starlink —it’s in 150 countries & it’s continuing to grow every week. We are the first mover when it comes to the infrastructure, & that partnership works really well because we complement the connectivity with the infrastructure & the AI. We always are at the edge. It’s funny, I get messages from our team all the time & it’s like the most crazy places you can imagine. And the edge is gonna continue to get redefined. I get calls literally—I was on the call with somebody and they’re like, “Hey, can we get one of these in Antarctica?” I’m like, “Well yeah, Starlink’s live in Antarctica. No reason why we can’t do that.” Obviously data center in space is the new hotness. Everybody’s talking about it." "Yeah, what’s the deal with that—so are you gonna get these in space?" :They are modular. I mean the edge is continuing—this is actually a debate that we have in terms of how soon it’s going to happen—but it’s definitely going to happen. Data centers in space is coming, and it makes sense, right? If you think about what SpaceX is talking about with Starship going to the moon—you’re going to need compute, especially as you start to think about Optimus robots building bases on the moon, later Mars. You’re going to need large amounts of compute. Not to mention a lot of the things that we do here on Earth, you’re gonna want to do there in space. And it’s a lot more efficient to do it, especially in hostile environments, if you can automate more of that—things like mining, for example. And so you’re gonna see data centers in space, and I’m sure we’re definitely gonna be a part of it. "What do you think about SpaceX’s rumored IPO for 2026?" "I mean, I think SpaceX is an incredible company and they have a ton of value. So I don’t have any insider information here—but I would say, hey, if the world can get access to SpaceX, I think that’s a good thing. Starlink is really amazing in the sense that it just continues to get better so fast. They’re rolling out in new countries every week in major markets. Just as a real recent example, just this last week they launched in South Korea—big market and an important ally for the US, so that’s a big deal. They’re also expanding the types of services that are available. It started as a consumer product, then they brought it to enterprise. Initially that was used more as a backup, and now it’s being used more as a primary—and that is because the service keeps getting better and better as more satellites go up into the sky. Each generation of satellite is also better, not to mention the terminals on the ground. There’s now multiple types of terminals, including the more recent minis that people really like—“Hey, I can put it in a backpack if I go on a hike or if I’m traveling. I can put it on the ski rack of my car.” Perfect internet all the time. All that does for us is it gives us more use cases that we can unlock. Now that you have connectivity on the oil rig, or on a farm, or a ranch—wherever you are—we can apply the AI to those situations on the ground without latency, and then send the metadata back to some other location that they want it. Part of the full-stack approach. And also with Starshield—that’s a huge advantage when you think about some of the conflicts that are going on. People talk to me a lot about this race with China and the geopolitical conflicts around the world. I am very grateful that SpaceX is an American company. I feel like it’s an unfair advantage that we have with Starshield available to the DoD. We want to be the first mover with the infrastructure and the AI to help solve problems at the edge, and the work we’re doing with the Navy is a good example of that."
4:01

The Rapid Growth of SpaceX, Starlink, Starshield & Armada: “I am very grateful that SpaceX is an American company.” "Data centers in space is coming, & it makes sense" “5 years ago they hadn’t even launched Starlink—now it’s in 150 countries & it’s continuing to grow every week.” “It’s an unfair advantage that we have with Starshield.” “If the world can get access to SpaceX, I think that’s a good thing.” Dan Wright (Dan Wright), CEO of Armada Elon (Elon Musk) builds long-term advantage, then unleashes it at massive scale: SpaceX, Starlink, Tesla, Neuralink, xAI.. . . . "We started the company working with SpaceX & they’ve continued to be a great partner for us. What that means is that as SpaceX rolls out throughout the world—& most people don’t know 5 years ago they hadn’t even launched Starlink —it’s in 150 countries & it’s continuing to grow every week. We are the first mover when it comes to the infrastructure, & that partnership works really well because we complement the connectivity with the infrastructure & the AI. We always are at the edge. It’s funny, I get messages from our team all the time & it’s like the most crazy places you can imagine. And the edge is gonna continue to get redefined. I get calls literally—I was on the call with somebody and they’re like, “Hey, can we get one of these in Antarctica?” I’m like, “Well yeah, Starlink’s live in Antarctica. No reason why we can’t do that.” Obviously data center in space is the new hotness. Everybody’s talking about it." "Yeah, what’s the deal with that—so are you gonna get these in space?" :They are modular. I mean the edge is continuing—this is actually a debate that we have in terms of how soon it’s going to happen—but it’s definitely going to happen. Data centers in space is coming, and it makes sense, right? If you think about what SpaceX is talking about with Starship going to the moon—you’re going to need compute, especially as you start to think about Optimus robots building bases on the moon, later Mars. You’re going to need large amounts of compute. Not to mention a lot of the things that we do here on Earth, you’re gonna want to do there in space. And it’s a lot more efficient to do it, especially in hostile environments, if you can automate more of that—things like mining, for example. And so you’re gonna see data centers in space, and I’m sure we’re definitely gonna be a part of it. "What do you think about SpaceX’s rumored IPO for 2026?" "I mean, I think SpaceX is an incredible company and they have a ton of value. So I don’t have any insider information here—but I would say, hey, if the world can get access to SpaceX, I think that’s a good thing. Starlink is really amazing in the sense that it just continues to get better so fast. They’re rolling out in new countries every week in major markets. Just as a real recent example, just this last week they launched in South Korea—big market and an important ally for the US, so that’s a big deal. They’re also expanding the types of services that are available. It started as a consumer product, then they brought it to enterprise. Initially that was used more as a backup, and now it’s being used more as a primary—and that is because the service keeps getting better and better as more satellites go up into the sky. Each generation of satellite is also better, not to mention the terminals on the ground. There’s now multiple types of terminals, including the more recent minis that people really like—“Hey, I can put it in a backpack if I go on a hike or if I’m traveling. I can put it on the ski rack of my car.” Perfect internet all the time. All that does for us is it gives us more use cases that we can unlock. Now that you have connectivity on the oil rig, or on a farm, or a ranch—wherever you are—we can apply the AI to those situations on the ground without latency, and then send the metadata back to some other location that they want it. Part of the full-stack approach. And also with Starshield—that’s a huge advantage when you think about some of the conflicts that are going on. People talk to me a lot about this race with China and the geopolitical conflicts around the world. I am very grateful that SpaceX is an American company. I feel like it’s an unfair advantage that we have with Starshield available to the DoD. We want to be the first mover with the infrastructure and the AI to help solve problems at the edge, and the work we’re doing with the Navy is a good example of that."

Molly O’Shea

30,317 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

This woman lives in an HOA. The back of her yard backs up into an easement that is owned by the HOA. The trees back there are on the easement. She points out that there are fallen branches all over her neighbors yard because of the trees and there were many in her yard as well. So she and her children went and picked up all the branches and sticks in her yard and then she piled them up under the tree. She said since the tree is on the HOA easement, it’s their problem. She wants to know if she is the bad guy in all this. If it were me, I’d maintain my yard and put the branches and sticks out for the trash pickup. Do you think she is in the right and it’s the HOA’s problem? Or do you think she is wrong and is making a mountain out of a molehill and there are better hills to plant your flag on?
0:32

This woman lives in an HOA. The back of her yard backs up into an easement that is owned by the HOA. The trees back there are on the easement. She points out that there are fallen branches all over her neighbors yard because of the trees and there were many in her yard as well. So she and her children went and picked up all the branches and sticks in her yard and then she piled them up under the tree. She said since the tree is on the HOA easement, it’s their problem. She wants to know if she is the bad guy in all this. If it were me, I’d maintain my yard and put the branches and sticks out for the trash pickup. Do you think she is in the right and it’s the HOA’s problem? Or do you think she is wrong and is making a mountain out of a molehill and there are better hills to plant your flag on?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

129,717 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨Dr. Jack Kruse on Sunlight, Spike Protein & The War On Your Frontal Lobes ‘I do want you to get into the COVID issue because we are seeing a lot of people with neurological issues, such as myself. But I’m seeing a lot of people that I am friendly with that are, you know, either my immediate family that are so lost, they’re still getting the jab. It’s, it’s horrendous and it’s really sad. Uh, they have serious like mental health issues. It’s almost like another person. Is this due to like the SV40 or what is going on with what’s the difference?’ Kruse: It’s a different mechanism. The SV40 link, the promoter link, we now know that it changes your DNA. So that’s the link to oncogenesis. That’s the cancer link. But this is what you have to understand about the jab. The jab was engineered to destroy the leptin-melanocortin pathway. Why? You know about spike protein. The spike protein has had the charge changed on it so that it immediately goes to the inner mitochondrial membrane. When it goes to the inner mitochondrial membrane, what does it effectively do for the non-scientists? It’s a short circuit. So if you understand what I just told you before about melanin, the engine, and the exhaust, imagine putting spike protein like in between the outside and the engine, in the engine, and then distally. They can knock it out anywhere because the goal is to stop the flow of electrons through this system. Well, the way it starts on the top, it starts with sunlight. Sunlight powers the electrons that go into your mitochondria. So, in the brain, you need to know about how the leptin-melanocortin pathway works. So, you know that I’m a brain surgeon, so I know a lot about this. In the brain, you have a master clock in your eye a master clock called the SCN. It is connected to the retina. So, where does the leptin-melanocortin pathway begin? It begins in the eye, okay? So, the retina sends this pathway directly to two places. One is the SCN, which is the master clock that controls all circadian biology. If that clock runs slower than all the other clocks distal, you get diseases in the distal organs. That’s really what the disease is. Here’s the key. There’s no synapses in that pathway from the retina to the SCN. There’s another pathway that also has no synapses that very few people talk about. That one goes to the habenular nucleus from the retina. What is the habenular nucleus in the hypothalamus, which is very close to where your pituitary is? It is the relay center to the frontal lobes. The frontal lobes are what make you different than primates. And that’s the reason why they were a target of COVID. That is the reason why behavioral changes have showed up. Remember what I told you about the original story about chromosome 2 folding in on itself. The people that were behind designing all this, they know all this architectural work that was done in the human genome project. They know why these people were interested in. You guys are just finding this out now. But people like me have been warning you about this before it even happened. But you know what the problem is? Just as you said, people thought I was crazy when I was saying all this stuff. Then now, when it comes out, you know, everybody wants to talk to me on their podcast and I’m like, well, look, I’ve already done my job as a doctor. I warned you. I told you exactly what the mechanisms were and why it would happen. And these things are all coordinated to take a human apart from what makes them human. And what makes us human, what’s the ultimate output of chromosome 2? These two frontal lobes. That is the reason why you’re seeing so many behavioral changes and you also need to understand that this is also the target of everything else. Why? Because they know that if they can control the circuits in these frontal lobes, you become a slave. And that’s what they want. Credit to Radiosynthesis Dr. Jack Kruse Decentralized Medicine Maxi 🔆 and firebreathingrob
4:01

🚨Dr. Jack Kruse on Sunlight, Spike Protein & The War On Your Frontal Lobes ‘I do want you to get into the COVID issue because we are seeing a lot of people with neurological issues, such as myself. But I’m seeing a lot of people that I am friendly with that are, you know, either my immediate family that are so lost, they’re still getting the jab. It’s, it’s horrendous and it’s really sad. Uh, they have serious like mental health issues. It’s almost like another person. Is this due to like the SV40 or what is going on with what’s the difference?’ Kruse: It’s a different mechanism. The SV40 link, the promoter link, we now know that it changes your DNA. So that’s the link to oncogenesis. That’s the cancer link. But this is what you have to understand about the jab. The jab was engineered to destroy the leptin-melanocortin pathway. Why? You know about spike protein. The spike protein has had the charge changed on it so that it immediately goes to the inner mitochondrial membrane. When it goes to the inner mitochondrial membrane, what does it effectively do for the non-scientists? It’s a short circuit. So if you understand what I just told you before about melanin, the engine, and the exhaust, imagine putting spike protein like in between the outside and the engine, in the engine, and then distally. They can knock it out anywhere because the goal is to stop the flow of electrons through this system. Well, the way it starts on the top, it starts with sunlight. Sunlight powers the electrons that go into your mitochondria. So, in the brain, you need to know about how the leptin-melanocortin pathway works. So, you know that I’m a brain surgeon, so I know a lot about this. In the brain, you have a master clock in your eye a master clock called the SCN. It is connected to the retina. So, where does the leptin-melanocortin pathway begin? It begins in the eye, okay? So, the retina sends this pathway directly to two places. One is the SCN, which is the master clock that controls all circadian biology. If that clock runs slower than all the other clocks distal, you get diseases in the distal organs. That’s really what the disease is. Here’s the key. There’s no synapses in that pathway from the retina to the SCN. There’s another pathway that also has no synapses that very few people talk about. That one goes to the habenular nucleus from the retina. What is the habenular nucleus in the hypothalamus, which is very close to where your pituitary is? It is the relay center to the frontal lobes. The frontal lobes are what make you different than primates. And that’s the reason why they were a target of COVID. That is the reason why behavioral changes have showed up. Remember what I told you about the original story about chromosome 2 folding in on itself. The people that were behind designing all this, they know all this architectural work that was done in the human genome project. They know why these people were interested in. You guys are just finding this out now. But people like me have been warning you about this before it even happened. But you know what the problem is? Just as you said, people thought I was crazy when I was saying all this stuff. Then now, when it comes out, you know, everybody wants to talk to me on their podcast and I’m like, well, look, I’ve already done my job as a doctor. I warned you. I told you exactly what the mechanisms were and why it would happen. And these things are all coordinated to take a human apart from what makes them human. And what makes us human, what’s the ultimate output of chromosome 2? These two frontal lobes. That is the reason why you’re seeing so many behavioral changes and you also need to understand that this is also the target of everything else. Why? Because they know that if they can control the circuits in these frontal lobes, you become a slave. And that’s what they want. Credit to Radiosynthesis Dr. Jack Kruse Decentralized Medicine Maxi 🔆 and firebreathingrob

Kenny Carmody

11,934 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Bill Chisholm: “It’s not about the money at all. This was, again, trying to put together the right set of players and assets to win now, to win next year, the following year, and the year after that. That's what this was about. None of these were about money. We have some more room now. If we see something we wanted, Brad's got the green light to do that. So I just really, I mean, I know there's people who feel like, 'Oh, there must be a smoking gun somewhere on the money,' but that's just not what this is about. And I can say it, and I'll keep saying it, but I'll also prove it to you when the time comes. When we have the opportunity, we're going to do that. And we've given ourselves the flexibility to do it now. So, it's fine to keep asking the question, because I know we have to prove it, and we will.”
1:32

Bill Chisholm: “It’s not about the money at all. This was, again, trying to put together the right set of players and assets to win now, to win next year, the following year, and the year after that. That's what this was about. None of these were about money. We have some more room now. If we see something we wanted, Brad's got the green light to do that. So I just really, I mean, I know there's people who feel like, 'Oh, there must be a smoking gun somewhere on the money,' but that's just not what this is about. And I can say it, and I'll keep saying it, but I'll also prove it to you when the time comes. When we have the opportunity, we're going to do that. And we've given ourselves the flexibility to do it now. So, it's fine to keep asking the question, because I know we have to prove it, and we will.”

Justin Turpin

10,831 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Tesla’s vision-only approach to solve FSD got laughed at for many years. People called it reckless, said just cameras would never be enough, and even claimed Tesla was cutting corners. Fast forward to today, it’s pretty clear who was right. “It’s so obvious you can solve this with cameras. Why wouldn’t you solve with cameras? It’s 2026. The self-driving problem is not a sensor problem, it’s an AI problem. The cameras have enough information already. It’s a problem of extracting the information, which is an AI problem.” - Ashok Elluswamy, VP of AI at Tesla. Just like us humans, we drive with eyes, we walk with eyes, literally we do everything with our eyes. We don’t have lidar spinning and laser beams on our heads. We simply see the world and our brain figures it out… all from vision. For so many years, the industry treated autonomy like it was a hardware problem. Like “if cameras struggle, just add more sensors.” That’s exactly how companies like Waymo ended up with sensor towers that look like crazy science projects. So ugly btw too… That approach might have made sense in 2008, but not today! Bc back then, AI wasn’t good enough to truly understand the world. So engineers had no choice but to lean on lidar and radar for help. But today, cameras capture insane amounts of information, I’m talking billions of pixels every second. The thing that was missing was AI intelligence. And when AI can understand why a car is slowing or why a pedestrian is hesitating, or real world things, you just need a better brain instead of more sensors. And now, everyone else is realizing this… the future of autonomy was always about understanding the world through vision, just like we humans do. That’s the bet that Elon and Tesla made early on… he was already years ahead of everyone, when everyone was doubling down on LiDAR and radar, even when so many people mocked them for switching early. Tesla vision for the win!!! 🥇
1:11

Tesla’s vision-only approach to solve FSD got laughed at for many years. People called it reckless, said just cameras would never be enough, and even claimed Tesla was cutting corners. Fast forward to today, it’s pretty clear who was right. “It’s so obvious you can solve this with cameras. Why wouldn’t you solve with cameras? It’s 2026. The self-driving problem is not a sensor problem, it’s an AI problem. The cameras have enough information already. It’s a problem of extracting the information, which is an AI problem.” - Ashok Elluswamy, VP of AI at Tesla. Just like us humans, we drive with eyes, we walk with eyes, literally we do everything with our eyes. We don’t have lidar spinning and laser beams on our heads. We simply see the world and our brain figures it out… all from vision. For so many years, the industry treated autonomy like it was a hardware problem. Like “if cameras struggle, just add more sensors.” That’s exactly how companies like Waymo ended up with sensor towers that look like crazy science projects. So ugly btw too… That approach might have made sense in 2008, but not today! Bc back then, AI wasn’t good enough to truly understand the world. So engineers had no choice but to lean on lidar and radar for help. But today, cameras capture insane amounts of information, I’m talking billions of pixels every second. The thing that was missing was AI intelligence. And when AI can understand why a car is slowing or why a pedestrian is hesitating, or real world things, you just need a better brain instead of more sensors. And now, everyone else is realizing this… the future of autonomy was always about understanding the world through vision, just like we humans do. That’s the bet that Elon and Tesla made early on… he was already years ahead of everyone, when everyone was doubling down on LiDAR and radar, even when so many people mocked them for switching early. Tesla vision for the win!!! 🥇

Teslaconomics

19,357 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад