Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

REPORT: Roblox is rolling out a terrifying AI system that rewrites what users say before their message ever reaches another player. The move signals a new phase of online moderation, one where platforms don’t just block words, they replace them. Roblox has begun deploying AI that alters chat messages...

VigilantFox's profile picture

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,965,829 subscribers

221,214 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

REPORT: Florida is now barreling toward a digital ID system, and the countdown has already begun. In just 30 days, tech companies could be forced to verify the identities of millions of users, a move critics warn could quietly erase online anonymity across the state. For months, Governor Ron DeSantis publicly blasted digital ID, warning it would allow governments to control citizens and track their lives online. He even said such a system would “hit a brick wall in Florida.” Now Florida’s own law may be opening that door. The Online Protections for Minors Act bans children under 14 from holding social media accounts and requires parental approval for teens 14 and 15. To enforce it, platforms must verify users’ ages or face civil penalties reaching $50,000 per violation. But here’s the catch. To prove you’re not a minor, many platforms will require government ID checks or biometric scans through third-party verification companies, some of them operating overseas. In other words, millions of adults may soon be forced to identify themselves just to use the internet. Critics say this is how digital ID systems always begin, first introduced as child protection, then expanded step by step into something much bigger. Floridians now have just 30 days before enforcement begins. The real question now is simple: once the system is built, will it ever be rolled back? Don't miss ZeeeMediaOfficial's report: 👇
8:26

REPORT: Florida is now barreling toward a digital ID system, and the countdown has already begun. In just 30 days, tech companies could be forced to verify the identities of millions of users, a move critics warn could quietly erase online anonymity across the state. For months, Governor Ron DeSantis publicly blasted digital ID, warning it would allow governments to control citizens and track their lives online. He even said such a system would “hit a brick wall in Florida.” Now Florida’s own law may be opening that door. The Online Protections for Minors Act bans children under 14 from holding social media accounts and requires parental approval for teens 14 and 15. To enforce it, platforms must verify users’ ages or face civil penalties reaching $50,000 per violation. But here’s the catch. To prove you’re not a minor, many platforms will require government ID checks or biometric scans through third-party verification companies, some of them operating overseas. In other words, millions of adults may soon be forced to identify themselves just to use the internet. Critics say this is how digital ID systems always begin, first introduced as child protection, then expanded step by step into something much bigger. Floridians now have just 30 days before enforcement begins. The real question now is simple: once the system is built, will it ever be rolled back? Don't miss ZeeeMediaOfficial's report: 👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

103,775 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

What happened one month after launching Action Model? 👾 250,000+ users. 👾 100,000+ browser extension downloads. 👾 Over 2,000 years of training data contributed to our community-owned AI model. And we’re just getting started. We’re building a new kind of AI platform, where users don’t just use AI, they train it, earn from it, and own part of it. Next up: ActionFi and Actionist Two major launches you won’t want to miss. If you’re interested in AI, automation, and the future of community-owned technology, now is the time to get involved.
0:49

What happened one month after launching Action Model? 👾 250,000+ users. 👾 100,000+ browser extension downloads. 👾 Over 2,000 years of training data contributed to our community-owned AI model. And we’re just getting started. We’re building a new kind of AI platform, where users don’t just use AI, they train it, earn from it, and own part of it. Next up: ActionFi and Actionist Two major launches you won’t want to miss. If you’re interested in AI, automation, and the future of community-owned technology, now is the time to get involved.

Action Model

31,952 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

“He knew. He knew that I would be the one to defend him.” Candace has referenced herself being THE ONE in relation to Charlie several times now—twice today alone. Does she explicitly say Erika is not defending him or standing up for him? No. But it is implied when she says she’s THE ONE. If it’s not what you mean then don’t say it. Say what you mean. Be intentional with your words. This has happened too many times now for it to just be a thoughtless error. Have some respect for the most important person in this man’s life—the one he actually chose and made a covenant with and who made a covenant with him, before God and family. Also, “they knew that I would be the one to burn it all down and see what rises from the ashes…Credit to them for recognizing I’m built different.” CRINGEWORTHY.
2:17

“He knew. He knew that I would be the one to defend him.” Candace has referenced herself being THE ONE in relation to Charlie several times now—twice today alone. Does she explicitly say Erika is not defending him or standing up for him? No. But it is implied when she says she’s THE ONE. If it’s not what you mean then don’t say it. Say what you mean. Be intentional with your words. This has happened too many times now for it to just be a thoughtless error. Have some respect for the most important person in this man’s life—the one he actually chose and made a covenant with and who made a covenant with him, before God and family. Also, “they knew that I would be the one to burn it all down and see what rises from the ashes…Credit to them for recognizing I’m built different.” CRINGEWORTHY.

Natalie Jean Beisner

21,637 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

At the BNB Chain hackathon, CZ 🔶 BNB made several very important points about AI trading (Everything in parentheses is my own view and judgment.) He first said that AI will be involved in trading everywhere. Trading itself is already a huge market: there are 300 million users on Binance alone, and if you add the decentralized ecosystems, that number is not small either. In such a mass-market environment, many different trading strategies can work, with countless different coins, different projects, and different ways to play. But there is a big problem here: building commercial AI trading platforms for retail users is actually very hard. If a trading strategy works very well for one person, once a billion people start using the same strategy, that strategy “might still work, or might stop working.” Take copy trading / follow trading as an example: if you buy first and everyone follows you, the first buyer will perform very well, but the last person to follow may not end up with good results. So, with the exact same strategy and the exact same copy logic, the outcomes can be completely different for different people. (On top of that, every strategy also has its own capital capacity limits.) Teams that can really build strong AI are, with high probability, going to trade with their own money. In today’s world, money itself is already somewhat like a “commodity”; many people have a lot of capital, and it’s actually not that hard to raise funds. If you truly have an algorithm that can make a lot of money, it’s not hard to get money and run your own book. There is really only one situation where you would sell this algorithm to mass-market users: for example, if you charge a $10 monthly subscription and can sell it to one million users, then your $10 million monthly subscription revenue is higher than the profit you could make by trading the strategy yourself. (Here this touches one of our earlier theses: as training AI models becomes relatively easier and the supply of models increases, model companies have more incentive to open-source. By analogy, as the production process of trading strategies is increasingly simplified by AI and the supply of strategies explodes, traders will have stronger incentives to monetize by expanding their influence in other words, by “open-sourcing” their strategies.) Of course, CZ did not say that this model can never work. Another path is to build an AI trading platform that lets users tune different AI algorithms, or very easily assemble their own structures and strategies, so that what each person ends up running is different and better tailored to themselves. Some people will make money, some people will lose money, but the platform still has value because it’s very hard for most people to build an AI trading algorithm from scratch. So there are a lot of trade-offs here; it’s not as simple as saying “once AI shows up, everything automatically gets better.” (This is exactly what we presented at the hackathon: you describe your own strategy in natural language, and the AI automatically generates a workflow. The parameters in that workflow, the models used, the logical structure, the APIs it calls, and even the algorithms it invokes are all customizable. The reasons we think workflows are a good way to do this include: controllable execution paths, Lego-like modular nodes, and better visualization that makes it easier for users to build and adjust their workflows.) Finally, his conclusion was very clear: it’s not that AI will definitely make trading better, and it’s not that AI will definitely make things worse. Rather, no matter what, in the future a huge number of people will use AI to trade. This will be a very large field, and whoever can build the best algorithms will make a lot of money.
2:38

At the BNB Chain hackathon, CZ 🔶 BNB made several very important points about AI trading (Everything in parentheses is my own view and judgment.) He first said that AI will be involved in trading everywhere. Trading itself is already a huge market: there are 300 million users on Binance alone, and if you add the decentralized ecosystems, that number is not small either. In such a mass-market environment, many different trading strategies can work, with countless different coins, different projects, and different ways to play. But there is a big problem here: building commercial AI trading platforms for retail users is actually very hard. If a trading strategy works very well for one person, once a billion people start using the same strategy, that strategy “might still work, or might stop working.” Take copy trading / follow trading as an example: if you buy first and everyone follows you, the first buyer will perform very well, but the last person to follow may not end up with good results. So, with the exact same strategy and the exact same copy logic, the outcomes can be completely different for different people. (On top of that, every strategy also has its own capital capacity limits.) Teams that can really build strong AI are, with high probability, going to trade with their own money. In today’s world, money itself is already somewhat like a “commodity”; many people have a lot of capital, and it’s actually not that hard to raise funds. If you truly have an algorithm that can make a lot of money, it’s not hard to get money and run your own book. There is really only one situation where you would sell this algorithm to mass-market users: for example, if you charge a $10 monthly subscription and can sell it to one million users, then your $10 million monthly subscription revenue is higher than the profit you could make by trading the strategy yourself. (Here this touches one of our earlier theses: as training AI models becomes relatively easier and the supply of models increases, model companies have more incentive to open-source. By analogy, as the production process of trading strategies is increasingly simplified by AI and the supply of strategies explodes, traders will have stronger incentives to monetize by expanding their influence in other words, by “open-sourcing” their strategies.) Of course, CZ did not say that this model can never work. Another path is to build an AI trading platform that lets users tune different AI algorithms, or very easily assemble their own structures and strategies, so that what each person ends up running is different and better tailored to themselves. Some people will make money, some people will lose money, but the platform still has value because it’s very hard for most people to build an AI trading algorithm from scratch. So there are a lot of trade-offs here; it’s not as simple as saying “once AI shows up, everything automatically gets better.” (This is exactly what we presented at the hackathon: you describe your own strategy in natural language, and the AI automatically generates a workflow. The parameters in that workflow, the models used, the logical structure, the APIs it calls, and even the algorithms it invokes are all customizable. The reasons we think workflows are a good way to do this include: controllable execution paths, Lego-like modular nodes, and better visualization that makes it easier for users to build and adjust their workflows.) Finally, his conclusion was very clear: it’s not that AI will definitely make trading better, and it’s not that AI will definitely make things worse. Rather, no matter what, in the future a huge number of people will use AI to trade. This will be a very large field, and whoever can build the best algorithms will make a lot of money.

Tykoo

25,535 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

"Robinhood appears to be doing what PayPal probably should have done, which is take every single user they can get their hands on and offer them USDG" Austin Campbell on why USDG with Robinhood is a test case the stablecoin space hasn't seen "USDG is going to be a fascinating test case of what happens if you show up with your own installed user base in the first place. Because Circle, as we know, is not really deeply retail facing, they use Coinbase for that, that's been a majority of their distribution" "USDG just showed up with a small company that has a handful of users called Robinhood attached to it, and I think that is a game we have not seen played in the stablecoin space before, a company coming with a large user base and pushing stablecoins to those users"
0:51

"Robinhood appears to be doing what PayPal probably should have done, which is take every single user they can get their hands on and offer them USDG" Austin Campbell on why USDG with Robinhood is a test case the stablecoin space hasn't seen "USDG is going to be a fascinating test case of what happens if you show up with your own installed user base in the first place. Because Circle, as we know, is not really deeply retail facing, they use Coinbase for that, that's been a majority of their distribution" "USDG just showed up with a small company that has a handful of users called Robinhood attached to it, and I think that is a game we have not seen played in the stablecoin space before, a company coming with a large user base and pushing stablecoins to those users"

Laura Shin

19,547 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

There are 2 types of people when it comes to AI 1. The ones who think that it will take over the world and that it must be destroyed 2. The ones who get excited about AI but don’t know how to use it they hear about a new platform from their friends spend 15 minutes treating it like Google get frustrated and just pretend they know what they are doing. Luckily you found this post a third option. One that shows you a real use case for AI and the solid foundation you need to not only make money but harness the full power of AI because as AI grows you know enough to grow with it instead of being stuck watching from the sidelines
1:36

There are 2 types of people when it comes to AI 1. The ones who think that it will take over the world and that it must be destroyed 2. The ones who get excited about AI but don’t know how to use it they hear about a new platform from their friends spend 15 minutes treating it like Google get frustrated and just pretend they know what they are doing. Luckily you found this post a third option. One that shows you a real use case for AI and the solid foundation you need to not only make money but harness the full power of AI because as AI grows you know enough to grow with it instead of being stuck watching from the sidelines

mika kilpelainen

39,459 просмотров • 1 день назад

A KID WITH CURSOR AI CAN NOW BUILD A ROBLOX GAME THAT MAKES $150M THIS IS NOT A JOKE Roblox has 80 million players logging in every single day. The platform pays out billions to creators annually. The top games generate seven and eight figure revenues every year. And until recently, building one required years of coding, 3D modeling, sound design, and game development experience. Cursor AI just removed every single one of those requirements. Maps, models, sounds, mechanics, monetization – all of it generated by describing what you want. The AI builds while you direct. Children are already shipping games this way. The Roblox gold rush isn't coming. It's already happening. The people getting in now with AI tools are building the games that will dominate the platform for the next decade. Bookmark this. The video explains exactly how to start.
2:59

A KID WITH CURSOR AI CAN NOW BUILD A ROBLOX GAME THAT MAKES $150M THIS IS NOT A JOKE Roblox has 80 million players logging in every single day. The platform pays out billions to creators annually. The top games generate seven and eight figure revenues every year. And until recently, building one required years of coding, 3D modeling, sound design, and game development experience. Cursor AI just removed every single one of those requirements. Maps, models, sounds, mechanics, monetization – all of it generated by describing what you want. The AI builds while you direct. Children are already shipping games this way. The Roblox gold rush isn't coming. It's already happening. The people getting in now with AI tools are building the games that will dominate the platform for the next decade. Bookmark this. The video explains exactly how to start.

SCOTTY BEAM

19,099 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Your baby understands language well before they can use it. Watch the reaction of these sweet toddler twins as their mother breaks into song. It’s not just that mom is singing. They seem to be lighting up in anticipation of its chorus: I LOVE YOU. Watch the little one on the right - whose eyebrows raise in anticipation of this loving message from their mother. It’s a fantastic reminder that receptive language (what we can hear and understand) precedes expressive language (what we can verbalize). And an important reminder not to forget that children understand the language spoken around them well before they can verbalize it themselves. The best rule of thumb: never assume your child is “too young to understand.” This sweet duo was shared to IG by babyjoyreels.
0:20

Your baby understands language well before they can use it. Watch the reaction of these sweet toddler twins as their mother breaks into song. It’s not just that mom is singing. They seem to be lighting up in anticipation of its chorus: I LOVE YOU. Watch the little one on the right - whose eyebrows raise in anticipation of this loving message from their mother. It’s a fantastic reminder that receptive language (what we can hear and understand) precedes expressive language (what we can verbalize). And an important reminder not to forget that children understand the language spoken around them well before they can verbalize it themselves. The best rule of thumb: never assume your child is “too young to understand.” This sweet duo was shared to IG by babyjoyreels.

Dan Wuori

48,077 просмотров • 1 год назад

If I had to start from zero tomorrow and bring in new customers fast, here's exactly what I'd build. Top to bottom. I'd start with the ad. Open ChatGPT or Claude, paste in what you sell and who you sell it to, ask it to write you ten different hooks for a Meta ad. Pick the best three. Then jump into or one of the AI video tools and have it generate the visual. Thirty minutes, you've got a real ad ready to run. You run that ad to one landing page. Not your homepage. One page, one offer, one call to action. Headline that stops the scroll, a few lines of value, an email or phone field, a button. That's it. Build it in HighLevel in about twenty minutes, drag, drop, you're done. The second someone enters their email, they drop into your CRM, automatically tagged with where they came from. Now the part most people skip, the follow-up. The moment that form is filled, a sequence kicks off automatically. Email and SMS, spaced over five to seven days. First message thanks them and delivers what you promised. Then a story. Then social proof. Then an objection you know they have. Then the offer. They don't have to think about you. You're showing up in their inbox and their texts at exactly the right time. The last message has a calendar link or a buy button right inside it. They tap, they book, or they buy. Done. The whole flow runs on its own from the ad all the way to the sale. You build it once. It works while you're sleeping. AI does the creative work. The system runs the customer journey. You spend your time on strategy. That's the play.
1:09

If I had to start from zero tomorrow and bring in new customers fast, here's exactly what I'd build. Top to bottom. I'd start with the ad. Open ChatGPT or Claude, paste in what you sell and who you sell it to, ask it to write you ten different hooks for a Meta ad. Pick the best three. Then jump into or one of the AI video tools and have it generate the visual. Thirty minutes, you've got a real ad ready to run. You run that ad to one landing page. Not your homepage. One page, one offer, one call to action. Headline that stops the scroll, a few lines of value, an email or phone field, a button. That's it. Build it in HighLevel in about twenty minutes, drag, drop, you're done. The second someone enters their email, they drop into your CRM, automatically tagged with where they came from. Now the part most people skip, the follow-up. The moment that form is filled, a sequence kicks off automatically. Email and SMS, spaced over five to seven days. First message thanks them and delivers what you promised. Then a story. Then social proof. Then an objection you know they have. Then the offer. They don't have to think about you. You're showing up in their inbox and their texts at exactly the right time. The last message has a calendar link or a buy button right inside it. They tap, they book, or they buy. Done. The whole flow runs on its own from the ad all the way to the sale. You build it once. It works while you're sleeping. AI does the creative work. The system runs the customer journey. You spend your time on strategy. That's the play.

Neil Patel

39,323 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Discord has begun rolling out age verification that estimates whether users are adults or teenagers based on their activity on the platform. This marks the beginning of the end of internet anonymity, with users potentially being pushed toward identification or other verification when Discord decides its age estimate is wrong. The system also may not solve the problem it's supposed to address. Predators could potentially manipulate the behavioral signals being used to estimate age, while ordinary users are forced to surrender more privacy. And it isn't stopping with Discord. YouTube already uses activity to estimate users' ages, and the concern is that identity and age checks will increasingly become a requirement across the major platforms people use every day.
11:17

Discord has begun rolling out age verification that estimates whether users are adults or teenagers based on their activity on the platform. This marks the beginning of the end of internet anonymity, with users potentially being pushed toward identification or other verification when Discord decides its age estimate is wrong. The system also may not solve the problem it's supposed to address. Predators could potentially manipulate the behavioral signals being used to estimate age, while ordinary users are forced to surrender more privacy. And it isn't stopping with Discord. YouTube already uses activity to estimate users' ages, and the concern is that identity and age checks will increasingly become a requirement across the major platforms people use every day.

TheQuartering

10,710 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Someone just stole from 37,000 $TAO holders and walked away clean. Not because they broke a rule. Because no rule existed to stop them. That changes today. Here is what happened. Covenant AI ran one of the most watched subnets on Bittensor. On April 10, the founder sold their entire position and disappeared. No warning. No announcement. No on-chain signal. By the time holders found out, the price had already moved against them. This was not a hack. This was not a bug. This was a founder legally exiting into their own community with zero accountability. Bittensor just closed that door permanently. The Conviction upgrade is live on mainnet today. Every emission a subnet owner earns now locks automatically the moment it arrives. They cannot touch it immediately. If they want to exit they must submit a public unlock transaction on-chain. Visible to every single person on the network the second it is submitted. Then the clock starts. 30 days before 63% of their position becomes spendable. 90 days before 95% is accessible. You now have a month of warning before the first dollar of sell pressure hits. A silent exit is no longer possible. The founder has to tell you they are leaving before they can leave. And it goes further. Any holder can now lock their tokens toward a different address they believe would run the subnet better. The address with the most locked support behind it becomes eligible to take over entirely. Bad owners can be replaced by the community before they do damage. Before today, subnet investing had one risk nobody could price. The person running it could vanish overnight, and you would never see it coming. That risk has been removed from the equation. Skin in the game used to be a promise. Now, it is a number on a block explorer that every holder can verify in real time. The people who understand what accountable infrastructure means for the value of $TAO will not need to explain themselves later. This is still early.
23:08

Someone just stole from 37,000 $TAO holders and walked away clean. Not because they broke a rule. Because no rule existed to stop them. That changes today. Here is what happened. Covenant AI ran one of the most watched subnets on Bittensor. On April 10, the founder sold their entire position and disappeared. No warning. No announcement. No on-chain signal. By the time holders found out, the price had already moved against them. This was not a hack. This was not a bug. This was a founder legally exiting into their own community with zero accountability. Bittensor just closed that door permanently. The Conviction upgrade is live on mainnet today. Every emission a subnet owner earns now locks automatically the moment it arrives. They cannot touch it immediately. If they want to exit they must submit a public unlock transaction on-chain. Visible to every single person on the network the second it is submitted. Then the clock starts. 30 days before 63% of their position becomes spendable. 90 days before 95% is accessible. You now have a month of warning before the first dollar of sell pressure hits. A silent exit is no longer possible. The founder has to tell you they are leaving before they can leave. And it goes further. Any holder can now lock their tokens toward a different address they believe would run the subnet better. The address with the most locked support behind it becomes eligible to take over entirely. Bad owners can be replaced by the community before they do damage. Before today, subnet investing had one risk nobody could price. The person running it could vanish overnight, and you would never see it coming. That risk has been removed from the equation. Skin in the game used to be a promise. Now, it is a number on a block explorer that every holder can verify in real time. The people who understand what accountable infrastructure means for the value of $TAO will not need to explain themselves later. This is still early.

2xnmore

19,549 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

OpenAI's Noam Brown says air-gapping the computers may not stop a misaligned AI, because two air-gapped machines can still talk by running a CPU hot and reading the temperature change "But I think the major takeaway from the incident is that people underestimated the AI. And we never want to be in a situation again where we underestimate the AI. It's a weird world, because AI progress is so fast that people are consistently underestimating the AI." "So to be in a situation where you don't underestimate it again, when it comes to safety and alignment, you have to have a very, very, very high bar." "You could even go as far as to say, "Well, we should air gap the computers." And I'm not convinced that that would be sufficient." "There are studies, and this is mostly academic, where you can have two computers next to each other that are air-gapped and they're still able to communicate with each other because they have temperature sensors." "One of them is able to run their CPU really hot, and then the other one can actually detect the temperature change, and then that actually gives them a mechanism to communicate." _________ Link and more key quotes from OpenAI's safety related conversations:
0:59

OpenAI's Noam Brown says air-gapping the computers may not stop a misaligned AI, because two air-gapped machines can still talk by running a CPU hot and reading the temperature change "But I think the major takeaway from the incident is that people underestimated the AI. And we never want to be in a situation again where we underestimate the AI. It's a weird world, because AI progress is so fast that people are consistently underestimating the AI." "So to be in a situation where you don't underestimate it again, when it comes to safety and alignment, you have to have a very, very, very high bar." "You could even go as far as to say, "Well, we should air gap the computers." And I'm not convinced that that would be sufficient." "There are studies, and this is mostly academic, where you can have two computers next to each other that are air-gapped and they're still able to communicate with each other because they have temperature sensors." "One of them is able to run their CPU really hot, and then the other one can actually detect the temperature change, and then that actually gives them a mechanism to communicate." _________ Link and more key quotes from OpenAI's safety related conversations:

Fireside Alpha

4,812,238 просмотров • 18 дней назад

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent making it very clear: Washington is willing to use the full force of its financial system to choke Iran economically. That may look like strength, but it also confirms what much of the world already suspects, that access to the dollar system is conditional and can be weaponised at will. Every time the US turns sanctions into a blunt instrument, it reinforces the case for countries to reduce their exposure to American financial dominance. You don’t have to admire BRICS to understand the dynamic. When the world’s reserve currency is used as leverage, other nations start building alternatives. Not out of ideology,out of self-preservation. Economic coercion doesn’t just pressure adversaries. It signals to neutral states that their sovereignty could be one policy shift away from being constrained. That accelerates diversification, parallel payment systems, and long-term de-dollarisation efforts. Washington may believe it’s tightening control. In reality, it may be steadily teaching the world how to operate without it. Power used recklessly has a cost. And over time, the cost compounds......
1:34

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent making it very clear: Washington is willing to use the full force of its financial system to choke Iran economically. That may look like strength, but it also confirms what much of the world already suspects, that access to the dollar system is conditional and can be weaponised at will. Every time the US turns sanctions into a blunt instrument, it reinforces the case for countries to reduce their exposure to American financial dominance. You don’t have to admire BRICS to understand the dynamic. When the world’s reserve currency is used as leverage, other nations start building alternatives. Not out of ideology,out of self-preservation. Economic coercion doesn’t just pressure adversaries. It signals to neutral states that their sovereignty could be one policy shift away from being constrained. That accelerates diversification, parallel payment systems, and long-term de-dollarisation efforts. Washington may believe it’s tightening control. In reality, it may be steadily teaching the world how to operate without it. Power used recklessly has a cost. And over time, the cost compounds......

Richard

43,036 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Jim Harbaugh says the best leaders on his team make the example of what to do ridiculously simple “We have so many leaders on our team. Probably the most I can ever think of on any team I’ve ever been on, in terms of being a player or a coach. The amount of example setters, the amount of tone setters that we have.” “Guys that lead on and off the field. They just give you the perfect example of what to do. You want to know what to do, how to do it, when to do it. Guys that put their entire, not just their heart, their heart and soul into the way they approach this game. Tremendous versions of themselves.” “It just makes it so easy for the rest of us, really. Watch them. Study them. Emulate them. See if you can go make them proud of you. That standard that they set is incredible.”
1:06

Jim Harbaugh says the best leaders on his team make the example of what to do ridiculously simple “We have so many leaders on our team. Probably the most I can ever think of on any team I’ve ever been on, in terms of being a player or a coach. The amount of example setters, the amount of tone setters that we have.” “Guys that lead on and off the field. They just give you the perfect example of what to do. You want to know what to do, how to do it, when to do it. Guys that put their entire, not just their heart, their heart and soul into the way they approach this game. Tremendous versions of themselves.” “It just makes it so easy for the rest of us, really. Watch them. Study them. Emulate them. See if you can go make them proud of you. That standard that they set is incredible.”

Josh Chambers

31,649 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Victor Davis Hanson just delivered a devastating breakdown explaining Democrats’ desperate strategy to hold power. Democrat policies are so unpopular they no longer believe they can win voters — so they’re now trying to radically change the system of governance instead. HANSON: “It seems to me that the Democrats have lost confidence in their agenda. In other words, they don't believe that you, the voter, really does want an open border." “And the same is true of critical race theory or critical legal theory or the emphasis and fixations on transgenderism or the Green New Deal.” “You put it all together and that message of the Democrats is not appealing. And so of course in the short term their strategy has been, ‘We're not Donald Trump. Donald Trump is a fascist.’” "When they look at these long-term prognoses, they get very angry. And so what is the reaction? Is it to change the agenda to win you over the vote? No. It's to change the system." "And so if you want to know why they want to get rid of the electoral college or why they want the census to count residents that could be here, in many cases are here illegally, maybe 30 million. If you want to know why they want to pack the Supreme Court ... it is that their message right now does not appeal to 51%.” “Their only alternative is to find radical changes in the system of governance to allow their unpopular agenda to be what? De facto popular.” Democrats would rather break the system than fix their failing agenda.
3:18

Victor Davis Hanson just delivered a devastating breakdown explaining Democrats’ desperate strategy to hold power. Democrat policies are so unpopular they no longer believe they can win voters — so they’re now trying to radically change the system of governance instead. HANSON: “It seems to me that the Democrats have lost confidence in their agenda. In other words, they don't believe that you, the voter, really does want an open border." “And the same is true of critical race theory or critical legal theory or the emphasis and fixations on transgenderism or the Green New Deal.” “You put it all together and that message of the Democrats is not appealing. And so of course in the short term their strategy has been, ‘We're not Donald Trump. Donald Trump is a fascist.’” "When they look at these long-term prognoses, they get very angry. And so what is the reaction? Is it to change the agenda to win you over the vote? No. It's to change the system." "And so if you want to know why they want to get rid of the electoral college or why they want the census to count residents that could be here, in many cases are here illegally, maybe 30 million. If you want to know why they want to pack the Supreme Court ... it is that their message right now does not appeal to 51%.” “Their only alternative is to find radical changes in the system of governance to allow their unpopular agenda to be what? De facto popular.” Democrats would rather break the system than fix their failing agenda.

Overton

89,595 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Elon Musk is building something no platform in history has actually attempted. A system that judges ideas without knowing who wrote them. Musk: “It should be possible for somebody to post content as a new user with no followers, and if that content is excellent, it gets seen by a lot of people.” Every platform before this ran on a single hidden variable. Identity. Not quality. Not originality. Not depth. Identity. Who you were determined what got seen. The architecture didn’t surface the best thinking. It surfaced the most established thinker. It chose pedigree over precision. Every single time. Musk is the first person with the infrastructure, the capital, and the sheer indifference to consensus required to strip that variable out. Grok reads everything. Every post from every account. Zero followers or ten million. No weighting for legacy. No deference to tenure. It measures one thing. Intrinsic excellence. The printing press created publishers. Radio created networks. Television created anchors. Social media created influencers. Every technology of liberation produced a new gatekeeper within one generation. Musk is betting AI is the first tool that can’t be captured. An algorithm with no concept of identity has no incumbency to protect. It just reads. And it surfaces what’s best. If that works, it doesn’t just change a platform. It exposes something about every system that came before it. Every trending page, every algorithm, every feed that claimed to surface quality was never measuring quality. It was measuring proximity to power and calling it merit. We never had meritocracy. We had hierarchy with better marketing. Musk is building the first real one. And the question it forces isn’t whether you can compete. It’s whether your work was ever actually good, or you were just early. Everyone wants meritocracy. Almost nobody has ever lived in one.
0:50

Elon Musk is building something no platform in history has actually attempted. A system that judges ideas without knowing who wrote them. Musk: “It should be possible for somebody to post content as a new user with no followers, and if that content is excellent, it gets seen by a lot of people.” Every platform before this ran on a single hidden variable. Identity. Not quality. Not originality. Not depth. Identity. Who you were determined what got seen. The architecture didn’t surface the best thinking. It surfaced the most established thinker. It chose pedigree over precision. Every single time. Musk is the first person with the infrastructure, the capital, and the sheer indifference to consensus required to strip that variable out. Grok reads everything. Every post from every account. Zero followers or ten million. No weighting for legacy. No deference to tenure. It measures one thing. Intrinsic excellence. The printing press created publishers. Radio created networks. Television created anchors. Social media created influencers. Every technology of liberation produced a new gatekeeper within one generation. Musk is betting AI is the first tool that can’t be captured. An algorithm with no concept of identity has no incumbency to protect. It just reads. And it surfaces what’s best. If that works, it doesn’t just change a platform. It exposes something about every system that came before it. Every trending page, every algorithm, every feed that claimed to surface quality was never measuring quality. It was measuring proximity to power and calling it merit. We never had meritocracy. We had hierarchy with better marketing. Musk is building the first real one. And the question it forces isn’t whether you can compete. It’s whether your work was ever actually good, or you were just early. Everyone wants meritocracy. Almost nobody has ever lived in one.

Dustin

29,743 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Beware, with allot of these newer cars that have the LED headlamps. Not only are they allot of work to remove, but the dealer doesn’t tell you that it’s not serviceable. Before, if a bulb went out, you could go and get one for less than $100 especially if you have the HID lights or halogen. With LED, you have to replace the whole headlamp if the light ever goes out. Would you pay the $1000-$5000 for a new headlamp or would you just say screw it, time to trade it in.
2:46

Beware, with allot of these newer cars that have the LED headlamps. Not only are they allot of work to remove, but the dealer doesn’t tell you that it’s not serviceable. Before, if a bulb went out, you could go and get one for less than $100 especially if you have the HID lights or halogen. With LED, you have to replace the whole headlamp if the light ever goes out. Would you pay the $1000-$5000 for a new headlamp or would you just say screw it, time to trade it in.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,272,798 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

We miss you Papa J- “Let me just give you one point. The NPP cannot be underestimated, you know it and I know it. They’ve been in existence for a long time, and have been changing their names up till this day. The nature of who they are, and what they are and where they’ve come from, it’s something they are happy with and they will be there for a long time.” The calculation I want to put before you is that, by virtue of who and what they are, their mannerisms, their character, will necessarily give rise to what you and I are in the NDC. In other words, by virtue of who we are; where we’ve come from, how we came about into being, I keep saying, we cannot afford to fight them on their terms.” He admonished that; “It’s important than we fight them on our terms. What are those terms? In other words, let’s not mimic their behaviour. Let us reach into the principles and the values they emerged out of the circumstances that gave birth to us. And if we can hold onto those principles and those values, we will move way into the future and no one can ever defeat us. We will ride and override any obstacle as we did in the past. Mimic them as some of them are doing and we will run into problems.NPP NEVER 👎 AGAIN GHANA 🇬🇭 SHALL RISE AGAIN
1:07

We miss you Papa J- “Let me just give you one point. The NPP cannot be underestimated, you know it and I know it. They’ve been in existence for a long time, and have been changing their names up till this day. The nature of who they are, and what they are and where they’ve come from, it’s something they are happy with and they will be there for a long time.” The calculation I want to put before you is that, by virtue of who and what they are, their mannerisms, their character, will necessarily give rise to what you and I are in the NDC. In other words, by virtue of who we are; where we’ve come from, how we came about into being, I keep saying, we cannot afford to fight them on their terms.” He admonished that; “It’s important than we fight them on our terms. What are those terms? In other words, let’s not mimic their behaviour. Let us reach into the principles and the values they emerged out of the circumstances that gave birth to us. And if we can hold onto those principles and those values, we will move way into the future and no one can ever defeat us. We will ride and override any obstacle as we did in the past. Mimic them as some of them are doing and we will run into problems.NPP NEVER 👎 AGAIN GHANA 🇬🇭 SHALL RISE AGAIN

Aristotlektv

20,744 просмотров • 1 год назад

.Palmer Luckey is the reason why Lulu Cheng Meservey created the Go Direct manifesto: Anduril had to go direct. They had no other option: “You're going to call some mainstream reporter and say, ‘Hey, the guy who got fired from Facebook for supporting Trump that you hate is doing a thing and you should hear him out?’” “We were not going the traditional path of TechCrunch or what Palmer calls trying to get the coolest startup award at one of these conferences.” “We were going directly to Quantico, to Camp Pendleton, to the CIA. Literally walking into their building and speaking to them.” “ Why would you go to somebody else as a supplicant asking them to carry the message for you so that they can filter it through their worldview, and then their editor, and then put it into their publication, and then hope that that spray and pray reaches some of the people that you care about?” “When you do that you lose the power of your intensity. [The wrong way is] the founder relays the message to their PR person who puts it into their own words and then pitches an editor and then the editor reinterprets the message.” Work backwards: Go to the podcasts and places where your ideal customers and recruits are getting their information and just go there.
3:45

.Palmer Luckey is the reason why Lulu Cheng Meservey created the Go Direct manifesto: Anduril had to go direct. They had no other option: “You're going to call some mainstream reporter and say, ‘Hey, the guy who got fired from Facebook for supporting Trump that you hate is doing a thing and you should hear him out?’” “We were not going the traditional path of TechCrunch or what Palmer calls trying to get the coolest startup award at one of these conferences.” “We were going directly to Quantico, to Camp Pendleton, to the CIA. Literally walking into their building and speaking to them.” “ Why would you go to somebody else as a supplicant asking them to carry the message for you so that they can filter it through their worldview, and then their editor, and then put it into their publication, and then hope that that spray and pray reaches some of the people that you care about?” “When you do that you lose the power of your intensity. [The wrong way is] the founder relays the message to their PR person who puts it into their own words and then pitches an editor and then the editor reinterprets the message.” Work backwards: Go to the podcasts and places where your ideal customers and recruits are getting their information and just go there.

David Senra

22,170 просмотров • 1 месяц назад