Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

RFK Jr.: "The 'vaccinated' vs. 'unvaccinated' data is the biggest statistical trick of this pandemic. Here’s the deception: You are NOT counted as "vaccinated" until 2 weeks after your 2nd shot. For the first 6 weeks, the vaccine is ineffective. Infection & death rates rise. But all those deaths...

1,759,565 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

"If people knew the truth they would not be taking this vaccine" RFK Jr on Pfizer's Clinical Trial data: "Your chance of dying of a heart attack [is] 500% greater than if you're unvaccinated" "people need to [understand this] criminal deception that has been imposed upon them". TRANSCRIPT: ROBERT F KENNEDY Jr: "The death rates from this vaccine, [there's] been more deaths in eight months [then in] all the billions of vaccines combined over the last 30 years.... from this one vaccine, 17,000 recorded deaths in the United States and we know the death rates [are] much higher than that, probably 40 times....the best math the best you know studies are showing that it's 40 times that.....so um you know the risks from the vaccine are [completely] untenable. "If people knew the truth they would not be taking this vaccine and then the benefits of the vaccine are apparently zero, or even sub zero after six months on the British data showing that the people who are vaccinated are actually more likely in many age categories to uh to get Covid and people who are unvaccinated uh which by the way was predicted" "We know that Pfizer knew this was going to happen because in their clinical trial [in] a six month clinical trial, was only six months, at the end of that period 20 people died in the vaccine group and only 14 in the placebo group.... of all cause mortality" "There were five heart attacks in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo group... so your chance of dying of a heart attack, from that vaccine according to their own studies, is 500% greater than if you're unvaccinated" "So they knew they were going to kill a lot of people and they did it anyway... and people need to be able to see those studies [and] understand the deception, this, you know criminal deception that has been imposed upon them"

Humanspective

69,939 views • 9 months ago

Deconstructed: How a Lancet Study Manufactured the "Vaccine Safer Than COVID" Headline. A recent headline from The Independent, based on a Lancet study, claims the COVID jab presents less harm than the virus itself. But a closer look reveals a masterclass in how to manipulate data to reach a predetermined conclusion. Here’s how the study was engineered: 1. Rigged Timeline for the "Infection" Group: - The study defined its "COVID infection" cohort from Jan 2020 to March 2022. - This crucially includes the pandemic's darkest period: no vaccines, no natural immunity, failed lockdown policies, and the highest mortality. This group was set up to look as bad as possible. 2. Stacked the Deck for the "Vaccinated" Group: - The vaccinated cohort was studied from Aug 2021 to Dec 2022. - By this time, natural immunity was widespread and the virus had evolved to be less severe (IFR decreased by an order of magnitude). This group was already at a massively lower risk before the vaccine was even factored in. 3. Narrowed the Focus to Hide the Truth: - The alarming graphs you see are based on outcomes in the FIRST SIX MONTHS for each group. - This further hones in on the absolute peak of the pandemic for the unvaccinated, versus a much calmer period for the vaccinated. 4. The "Vaccinated" Group is a Misonomer: - The study's definition of "vaccinated" was a record of a SINGLE Pfizer dose. - We know from robust data that myocarditis risk spikes dramatically after the SECOND and THIRD doses. By ignoring this, the study completely sidesteps the primary source of vaccine-associated harm. The result? A chart showing infection as dangerously red and vaccination as safely blue. But when you analyze ALL the data from the same study—without the cherry-picked windows—the graph flips. It shows the vaccinated group with significantly higher rates of myocarditis, inflammatory conditions, pulmonary embolism, and stroke. This isn't science; it's narrative support. It's starting with a headline and working backward, twisting every parameter until the numbers comply. The days of accepting these "cooked-book" studies at face value are over. It's time for the objective, transparent science the public deserves.

Camus

22,083 views • 9 months ago