Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Ricky Gervais on God & why the universe exists - "Why is there SOMETHING rather than Nothing" “I’m an agnostic atheist. Technically everyone’s agnostic… no one knows whether there’s a God. We don’t know." "An agnostic atheist is someone who doesn’t know there’s a God or not, as no... show more

Interstellar

134,068 subscribers

11,639 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

A message on atheism An atheist will come and attack a Christian with this common question. Psalms 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.

A message on atheism An atheist will come and attack a Christian with this common question. Psalms 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.

The Anointed Man.

18,035 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Interesting argument. If we were to steel man this and represent it as a syllogism I think it would look like this: 1. God is perfect 2. A perfect being would only create perfect things 3. The world is imperfect 4. Therefore, a perfect God could not have created this world ...And then we'd further conclude a perfect God doesn't exist. The problem is with premise two, for a number of reasons. Firstly, what does it mean to be perfect? To be perfect is to lack for nothing, to be without flaws, to be fully actualized. But only God is like that, so the only way for God to make something perfect would be to make another God exactly like Himself. But there's a problem with this because the second God couldn't be exactly the same since he had to be created, rather than simply existing by his very nature. So logically speaking God can't create something perfect. This means that if* God creates, God can only create things that are imperfect. So now that we've established that God can't make something perfect, I guess the question is... why would God create? Here's a thought. Ontologically speaking God is the greatest conceivable being... would the greatest conceivable being create things? Or not create things? It seems obvious that creating is greater than not creating. An artist that creates no art wouldn't be much of an artist. If this is correct, it means God will create, and from my first argument God will create something imperfect... something flawed. Something lacking. Another thing worth pointing out is that as humans we knowingly create imperfect beings. We know when a baby is born, it's not perfect... yet we choose to do it anyway. Why? Is our desire to bring new life into the world something evil or wicked? I don't think so. I think it comes from our love for each other and our understanding that giving life is a blessing, even if that child screws up, even if they suffer, their life is a blessing. If God is good, wouldn't He want to bless something with the gift of life, the same way we do? I don't see why not. From this I think it follows that if God exists we'd expect to be in some sort of imperfect or flawed reality, and that's exactly what we find ourselves in. But how does atheism explain the existence of a flawed world? To say that something is flawed is to say it's not how it should be. But how can the world be flawed if atheism is true? On atheism the world just... is. It's not meant to be any sort of way. To be consistent the atheist would have to say reality isn't flawed, which is obviously absurd. This means that not only can Christianity explain the world we find ourselves in, it predicts it logically. Atheism on the other hand would have to predict a totally neutral world with no flaws, no issues, no evil... and no one in their right mind would say that's the world we find ourselves in. So this argument not only fails, it gives us more great reasons to reject atheism.

Interesting argument. If we were to steel man this and represent it as a syllogism I think it would look like this: 1. God is perfect 2. A perfect being would only create perfect things 3. The world is imperfect 4. Therefore, a perfect God could not have created this world ...And then we'd further conclude a perfect God doesn't exist. The problem is with premise two, for a number of reasons. Firstly, what does it mean to be perfect? To be perfect is to lack for nothing, to be without flaws, to be fully actualized. But only God is like that, so the only way for God to make something perfect would be to make another God exactly like Himself. But there's a problem with this because the second God couldn't be exactly the same since he had to be created, rather than simply existing by his very nature. So logically speaking God can't create something perfect. This means that if* God creates, God can only create things that are imperfect. So now that we've established that God can't make something perfect, I guess the question is... why would God create? Here's a thought. Ontologically speaking God is the greatest conceivable being... would the greatest conceivable being create things? Or not create things? It seems obvious that creating is greater than not creating. An artist that creates no art wouldn't be much of an artist. If this is correct, it means God will create, and from my first argument God will create something imperfect... something flawed. Something lacking. Another thing worth pointing out is that as humans we knowingly create imperfect beings. We know when a baby is born, it's not perfect... yet we choose to do it anyway. Why? Is our desire to bring new life into the world something evil or wicked? I don't think so. I think it comes from our love for each other and our understanding that giving life is a blessing, even if that child screws up, even if they suffer, their life is a blessing. If God is good, wouldn't He want to bless something with the gift of life, the same way we do? I don't see why not. From this I think it follows that if God exists we'd expect to be in some sort of imperfect or flawed reality, and that's exactly what we find ourselves in. But how does atheism explain the existence of a flawed world? To say that something is flawed is to say it's not how it should be. But how can the world be flawed if atheism is true? On atheism the world just... is. It's not meant to be any sort of way. To be consistent the atheist would have to say reality isn't flawed, which is obviously absurd. This means that not only can Christianity explain the world we find ourselves in, it predicts it logically. Atheism on the other hand would have to predict a totally neutral world with no flaws, no issues, no evil... and no one in their right mind would say that's the world we find ourselves in. So this argument not only fails, it gives us more great reasons to reject atheism.

Darwin to Jesus

57,779 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Harvard-bred agnostic turned "want-to-be believer" Charles Murray joins the show to explore why modern science points toward God. Timestamps: 0:00 Charles Murray on rediscovering faith 2:30 How an agnostic found belief through reason 5:30 The fine-tuning of the universe points to God 10:10 Consciousness and evidence for the soul 16:20 C.S. Lewis and the logic of Christianity 23:00 Why faith is making a cultural comeback

Harvard-bred agnostic turned "want-to-be believer" Charles Murray joins the show to explore why modern science points toward God. Timestamps: 0:00 Charles Murray on rediscovering faith 2:30 How an agnostic found belief through reason 5:30 The fine-tuning of the universe points to God 10:10 Consciousness and evidence for the soul 16:20 C.S. Lewis and the logic of Christianity 23:00 Why faith is making a cultural comeback

Eric Metaxas

15,706 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Josh Radnor says atheism doesn’t exist because everyone worships something "I have this theory that there’s no such thing as atheism. If you don’t believe in God, what is your obsession? What do you put front and center above yourself?" "Tech is a god. Any addiction is a god. Materialism, worship of nation, even worship of your religion" "Our need to transcend and worship didn’t go anywhere. We started finding all of that in our partner, which has been pretty grievous for relationships"

Josh Radnor says atheism doesn’t exist because everyone worships something "I have this theory that there’s no such thing as atheism. If you don’t believe in God, what is your obsession? What do you put front and center above yourself?" "Tech is a god. Any addiction is a god. Materialism, worship of nation, even worship of your religion" "Our need to transcend and worship didn’t go anywhere. We started finding all of that in our partner, which has been pretty grievous for relationships"

Yonan

62,260 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This is a great video by Mike Winger. Many people who don’t know my story think I grew up in the church. I actually grew up in an Atheist home and I was told not to question science or the belief that there is no God. I had many questions and I was encouraged not to ask them. That doesn’t sound like critical thinking or free thinking. Search for the truth yourself to be sure of what you believe. That’s why I encourage Christians to know what you believe and why you believe it.

This is a great video by Mike Winger. Many people who don’t know my story think I grew up in the church. I actually grew up in an Atheist home and I was told not to question science or the belief that there is no God. I had many questions and I was encouraged not to ask them. That doesn’t sound like critical thinking or free thinking. Search for the truth yourself to be sure of what you believe. That’s why I encourage Christians to know what you believe and why you believe it.

Sarah

53,402 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

“Simply stated, there is no such thing as transgender. You’re either XX or XY. That’s it. God made man, male and female, that is determined genetically. That is physiology. That is science. That is reality. This notion that you are something other than your biology is a cultural construct, intended as an assault on God.” — John MacArthur

“Simply stated, there is no such thing as transgender. You’re either XX or XY. That’s it. God made man, male and female, that is determined genetically. That is physiology. That is science. That is reality. This notion that you are something other than your biology is a cultural construct, intended as an assault on God.” — John MacArthur

Terri Green

21,471 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"I have not tolerated an atheist in the ranks of the SS. Every member has a deep faith in God, in what my ancestors called in their language Waralda [or Wralda], the Ancient One, the one who is mightier than we are." ~ Heinrich Himmler

"I have not tolerated an atheist in the ranks of the SS. Every member has a deep faith in God, in what my ancestors called in their language Waralda [or Wralda], the Ancient One, the one who is mightier than we are." ~ Heinrich Himmler

Germanischer Dämon

138,359 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

“So what is god? We are investigating, I am not attacking god. I am not denying god, but we are investigating whether there is such a thing as god. Who invented god? Did god invent us, did god create us? Right? God, who is omnipotent, omniscient, eternal, merciful, just, all goodness. Right? That’s your concept of god. And if you say, he has created us, then we are part of his image, we are part of him. That is, we are omniscient, generous, loving…. If god created you, he must be an extraordinary entity, because he wants you to lead a terrible life….. …belief has no place where truth is concerned.” ~ J. Krishnamuti

“So what is god? We are investigating, I am not attacking god. I am not denying god, but we are investigating whether there is such a thing as god. Who invented god? Did god invent us, did god create us? Right? God, who is omnipotent, omniscient, eternal, merciful, just, all goodness. Right? That’s your concept of god. And if you say, he has created us, then we are part of his image, we are part of him. That is, we are omniscient, generous, loving…. If god created you, he must be an extraordinary entity, because he wants you to lead a terrible life….. …belief has no place where truth is concerned.” ~ J. Krishnamuti

Priyank Kharge / ಪ್ರಿಯಾಂಕ್ ಖರ್ಗೆ

93,942 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Buttigieg: We know that there is more to life than partisan political combat. We know the American flag does not belong to one political side in this country, just as surely as we know that God does not belong to a political party in the United States of America.

Buttigieg: We know that there is more to life than partisan political combat. We know the American flag does not belong to one political side in this country, just as surely as we know that God does not belong to a political party in the United States of America.

Acyn

40,448 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Jesus Christ is the ONLY truth. Whether you die as a Muslim, a Buddhist, an atheist, or a Hindu, you will face only one God. His name is Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Pray for Mari Mari Emmanuel 🙏

Jesus Christ is the ONLY truth. Whether you die as a Muslim, a Buddhist, an atheist, or a Hindu, you will face only one God. His name is Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Pray for Mari Mari Emmanuel 🙏

Modern Crusaders

99,836 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

My Personal View on Religion and Atheism: I genuinely believe we are living in a simulation of some kind. The chances, in my mind are far more likely than not. I don't believe in any of the various religions, but I think that atheism is just as faith-based as any of the major religions and probably just as likely to be false. If you atheist and attacking religious people, you are a hypocrite. Something likely created us, but it's likely not the "god" that most people envision in religious texts. In fact we could all be our own god in that the universe we live in is centered around us, and everyone else is an NPC. It is also possible that no one is an NPC and we are in a Massive Multi-player simulation, or somewhere in between the two. I'm pretty certain that through rendering (or not), it will eventually be entirely possible to simulate an entire universe and that we will eventually do it if we don't end humanity first. If we can simulate a Universe at some point in the future then we are almost certainly living in a simulated Universe. People ask me why I don't fear death if I'm agnostic and don't believe in any of the major religions. The answer is simple: There are an infinite number of possibilities as to what happens when we die. 'Nothingness' is only 1 of those possibilities, and any intelligent life form would likely make whatever comes next pleasant, as the more intelligent an organism gets the more compassionate they usually get. I like my odds.

My Personal View on Religion and Atheism: I genuinely believe we are living in a simulation of some kind. The chances, in my mind are far more likely than not. I don't believe in any of the various religions, but I think that atheism is just as faith-based as any of the major religions and probably just as likely to be false. If you atheist and attacking religious people, you are a hypocrite. Something likely created us, but it's likely not the "god" that most people envision in religious texts. In fact we could all be our own god in that the universe we live in is centered around us, and everyone else is an NPC. It is also possible that no one is an NPC and we are in a Massive Multi-player simulation, or somewhere in between the two. I'm pretty certain that through rendering (or not), it will eventually be entirely possible to simulate an entire universe and that we will eventually do it if we don't end humanity first. If we can simulate a Universe at some point in the future then we are almost certainly living in a simulated Universe. People ask me why I don't fear death if I'm agnostic and don't believe in any of the major religions. The answer is simple: There are an infinite number of possibilities as to what happens when we die. 'Nothingness' is only 1 of those possibilities, and any intelligent life form would likely make whatever comes next pleasant, as the more intelligent an organism gets the more compassionate they usually get. I like my odds.

Brian Krassenstein

174,992 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Why God does not exist. My best arguments against the proposition that God does exist, at the Oxford Union Society debate. (I know, you can't prove a negative, but there is substantial positive evidence that humans created the God concept, which I present here.)

Why God does not exist. My best arguments against the proposition that God does exist, at the Oxford Union Society debate. (I know, you can't prove a negative, but there is substantial positive evidence that humans created the God concept, which I present here.)

Michael Shermer

45,553 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Lol. You know that you are wrong वरुण 🇮🇳. No - not all religions says we're best and our god is the only one. Hinduism believes in Universalism "Sarv dharm sambhav". Many path that can lead to truth or salvation. Whereas Islam and Christianity follows Monotheistic principles, the oneness of god. "Laa ee-laa-ha ill-Allah" or "One god, One lord" (there is no god but...). They have exclusive provisions for the "non-believers". And btw you can preach these all as "atheist" and still can be as good as any other Hindu. This is tolerance and acceptance and this is difference.

Lol. You know that you are wrong वरुण 🇮🇳. No - not all religions says we're best and our god is the only one. Hinduism believes in Universalism "Sarv dharm sambhav". Many path that can lead to truth or salvation. Whereas Islam and Christianity follows Monotheistic principles, the oneness of god. "Laa ee-laa-ha ill-Allah" or "One god, One lord" (there is no god but...). They have exclusive provisions for the "non-believers". And btw you can preach these all as "atheist" and still can be as good as any other Hindu. This is tolerance and acceptance and this is difference.

The Hawk Eye

89,059 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Why does God allow innocent children to die? MAGA preacher Robert Jeffress says God is keeping that a secret. "It's not because there's not an answer. God has an answer! But I think He knows that we're incapable of understanding that answer."

Why does God allow innocent children to die? MAGA preacher Robert Jeffress says God is keeping that a secret. "It's not because there's not an answer. God has an answer! But I think He knows that we're incapable of understanding that answer."

Hemant Mehta

253,019 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

The First Dimension of the Five Representations of The One True God that The Church Must Present to the World is The God who forgives. (Psalm 103:1-3, Daniel 9:9, Ephesians 1:7, Jeremiah 31:3, John 3:16). There needs to be a representation of a God who loves and forgives them, not to condone sin but as an expression of His love for them. A forgiving God is a God worth coming to, because forgiveness is a scarce commodity in today's world. God does not condone sin, but can abundantly pardon. God does not forgive rebels. There is a condition to receive forgiveness from God. The condition to receiving forgiveness from God is genuine brokenness and repentance. Watch the full sermon titled “THE MOUNTAIN OF THE LORD’S HOUSE” on our YouTube channel at Koinonia Global. Share this message with someone today. #ApostleJoshuaSelman #TheMountainOfTheLordsHouse #KoinoniaAbuja #KoinoniaGlobal

The First Dimension of the Five Representations of The One True God that The Church Must Present to the World is The God who forgives. (Psalm 103:1-3, Daniel 9:9, Ephesians 1:7, Jeremiah 31:3, John 3:16). There needs to be a representation of a God who loves and forgives them, not to condone sin but as an expression of His love for them. A forgiving God is a God worth coming to, because forgiveness is a scarce commodity in today's world. God does not condone sin, but can abundantly pardon. God does not forgive rebels. There is a condition to receive forgiveness from God. The condition to receiving forgiveness from God is genuine brokenness and repentance. Watch the full sermon titled “THE MOUNTAIN OF THE LORD’S HOUSE” on our YouTube channel at Koinonia Global. Share this message with someone today. #ApostleJoshuaSelman #TheMountainOfTheLordsHouse #KoinoniaAbuja #KoinoniaGlobal

Koinonia Global

39,075 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Roman Reigns talks about his belief in God. "Nothing is possible without God. Whether you’re religious or not, I think it’s important to believe in a higher power. Jesus Christ is the son of God. He died for our sins." 🙏🙏🙏

Roman Reigns talks about his belief in God. "Nothing is possible without God. Whether you’re religious or not, I think it’s important to believe in a higher power. Jesus Christ is the son of God. He died for our sins." 🙏🙏🙏

EliteRockerz 𝕏

922,859 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

A Christian friend of mine called me last night to talk about the problem of animal suffering because of Alex O'Connor’s debate with William Lane Craig. He was concerned because he thinks that Alex made a good argument. Before I give my thoughts let’s get one thing straight: This is not a logical argument, it’s an emotional argument. The atheist always taps into our emotions to when they talk about this. We’re asked to think of things like a Zebra getting his windpipe crushed by a lion so that as we deal with the argument we’re feeling, rather than thinking. So before I give a few brief remarks, let’s all turn our brains back on and the feelings off (if you can) and actually consider this rationally. 1. Alex and many other atheists bring up suffering as if it adds onto itself, so here’s one instance of suffering and that’s one, and here’s another instance in another animal so that’s two, three, etc… but why? Why are we adding up individual creature suffering and putting it all into the same bin of “suffering?” Every individual experiences its own local suffering, that’s it. There’s no aggregate. There’s no “pool of suffering.” The move to stack one animal’s suffering on top of another animal is silly. I don’t see any justification for it. 2. Suffering just means not getting what you want, that’s it, and it’s temporary. Yesterday at the pool my daughter stubbed her toe. She said “ow!” She hopped around, and then she forgot all about it and went back to playing. It wasn’t a big deal. Atheists act like suffering is just the end of the world and frankly it’s childish. We all suffer, we all don’t get what we want, so what? Why is God obligated to give us what we want all the time? He isn’t. Not only that but suffering can make people better, it helps you appreciate things, learn lessons, etc. There’s nothing about suffering that indicates it’s some kind of evil thing that God must stop and shouldn’t be allowing. To really make my point imagine a world without suffering and then someone gets a tummy ache. He’s now suffering. Should we now think God doesn’t exist because one man got an ache in his tum tum? I think not. What about two aches, in two tum tums? See where I’m going? There’s nothing incompatible with God and suffering. This is just emotional manipulation. 3. Suffering has a lot to do with frame of reference. If you turned a human into an ant, they’d probably suffer a lot, but that’s because they know what it is to not be an ant. Compared to a human, ants live very difficult lives. But does the ant know that? No, an ant is just an ant. That’s all it knows. It has no frame of reference and what we might find horrible, an ant finds mundane and normal. In other words, it’s entirely possible that animals don’t suffer nearly as much as we think they do, and the only reason we think they suffer is because we’re projecting ourselves onto them. If WE were them, we wouldn’t like it. But that doesn’t necessarily follow, I would hate to be a fly eating poop all day, but does a fly suffer when they eat poop? No, they love it. The other day I saw a video of a woman with no arms, just legs. She could do everything—drive, get dressed, etc. When we see a woman without arms we imagine they’re suffering because we love our arms, but she’s never had them. So is she suffering? Or is this just all she knows? So it’s not obvious that animals suffer anywhere near as much as we imagine they do. 4. Lastly, according to what worldview is suffering “bad?” When the atheist points at suffering as an evil/bad thing, are they doing that from their atheism, or from our worldview as Christians? Does the atheist need to borrow from our worldview to even make sense of the idea that there’s something wrong with suffering? Or are they able to conjure this metaphysical idea of “badness” up on atheism as well? This really needs to be pushed on. I don’t think for one second that atheism can account for something like “badness,” so the very thing they want to complain about is totally fine according to their own worldview. If that’s the case, which worldview is less likely to be true… the Christian worldview where we have sin and badness, or the atheist worldview where things just happen, events… and the moral dimension is nothing but a programmed illusion? I think it goes without saying that the atheist worldview is far less likely to be true if that’s the case, and if it isn’t, the atheist has a lot of work to do in explaining how their absurd worldview can make sense of why wrongness exists. We need to stop granting atheists access to metaphysics that make absolutely no sense on their own worldview.

A Christian friend of mine called me last night to talk about the problem of animal suffering because of Alex O'Connor’s debate with William Lane Craig. He was concerned because he thinks that Alex made a good argument. Before I give my thoughts let’s get one thing straight: This is not a logical argument, it’s an emotional argument. The atheist always taps into our emotions to when they talk about this. We’re asked to think of things like a Zebra getting his windpipe crushed by a lion so that as we deal with the argument we’re feeling, rather than thinking. So before I give a few brief remarks, let’s all turn our brains back on and the feelings off (if you can) and actually consider this rationally. 1. Alex and many other atheists bring up suffering as if it adds onto itself, so here’s one instance of suffering and that’s one, and here’s another instance in another animal so that’s two, three, etc… but why? Why are we adding up individual creature suffering and putting it all into the same bin of “suffering?” Every individual experiences its own local suffering, that’s it. There’s no aggregate. There’s no “pool of suffering.” The move to stack one animal’s suffering on top of another animal is silly. I don’t see any justification for it. 2. Suffering just means not getting what you want, that’s it, and it’s temporary. Yesterday at the pool my daughter stubbed her toe. She said “ow!” She hopped around, and then she forgot all about it and went back to playing. It wasn’t a big deal. Atheists act like suffering is just the end of the world and frankly it’s childish. We all suffer, we all don’t get what we want, so what? Why is God obligated to give us what we want all the time? He isn’t. Not only that but suffering can make people better, it helps you appreciate things, learn lessons, etc. There’s nothing about suffering that indicates it’s some kind of evil thing that God must stop and shouldn’t be allowing. To really make my point imagine a world without suffering and then someone gets a tummy ache. He’s now suffering. Should we now think God doesn’t exist because one man got an ache in his tum tum? I think not. What about two aches, in two tum tums? See where I’m going? There’s nothing incompatible with God and suffering. This is just emotional manipulation. 3. Suffering has a lot to do with frame of reference. If you turned a human into an ant, they’d probably suffer a lot, but that’s because they know what it is to not be an ant. Compared to a human, ants live very difficult lives. But does the ant know that? No, an ant is just an ant. That’s all it knows. It has no frame of reference and what we might find horrible, an ant finds mundane and normal. In other words, it’s entirely possible that animals don’t suffer nearly as much as we think they do, and the only reason we think they suffer is because we’re projecting ourselves onto them. If WE were them, we wouldn’t like it. But that doesn’t necessarily follow, I would hate to be a fly eating poop all day, but does a fly suffer when they eat poop? No, they love it. The other day I saw a video of a woman with no arms, just legs. She could do everything—drive, get dressed, etc. When we see a woman without arms we imagine they’re suffering because we love our arms, but she’s never had them. So is she suffering? Or is this just all she knows? So it’s not obvious that animals suffer anywhere near as much as we imagine they do. 4. Lastly, according to what worldview is suffering “bad?” When the atheist points at suffering as an evil/bad thing, are they doing that from their atheism, or from our worldview as Christians? Does the atheist need to borrow from our worldview to even make sense of the idea that there’s something wrong with suffering? Or are they able to conjure this metaphysical idea of “badness” up on atheism as well? This really needs to be pushed on. I don’t think for one second that atheism can account for something like “badness,” so the very thing they want to complain about is totally fine according to their own worldview. If that’s the case, which worldview is less likely to be true… the Christian worldview where we have sin and badness, or the atheist worldview where things just happen, events… and the moral dimension is nothing but a programmed illusion? I think it goes without saying that the atheist worldview is far less likely to be true if that’s the case, and if it isn’t, the atheist has a lot of work to do in explaining how their absurd worldview can make sense of why wrongness exists. We need to stop granting atheists access to metaphysics that make absolutely no sense on their own worldview.

Darwin to Jesus

12,519 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce