RIP Wikipedia Grokipedia v0.3

who approves the 1,177,038 edits. humans, or the model checking its own output

Grokipedia has a long way to go. No so fast, here is an example...

Wikipedia's moat was never the article count. It's the editors who argue over every line. v0.3 resumes edit suggestions, but Grok reviews them, so a model grades edits to an encyclopedia a model wrote. That's a closed loop. Call it RIP when a human can overrule it.

the ranked topics give the homepage a clear discovery path

accuratepedia

Why do we need any pedio when we don't even use google to find information

v0.3 and wikipedia already sweating

No!! If we said that to platform like Wikipedia to replace it with something like Grokipedia.. This means that we condemn creative human thinking to death and this is only the beginning. Algos are easy to manipulate to give false infos on the basis that it's true unlike humans.

grokpedia has to be better than Wikipedia before we can finally say RIP to it

RIP is a bit early. v0.3 is a new logo and a homepage that is no longer a search bar. From late April to September the edit pipeline was dead, 13,000 suggestions sat in review, and nobody said a word. Wikipedia is slow and biased on politics. It did not spend five months frozen while claiming to be the upgrade. Paint is not a kill shot.