Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Ripple's Ayo Akinyele explained XRPL privacy it's like checking your bank balance at a coffee shop nobody around you sees it, but compliance never blinks. Confidential MPTs hide the amount, zero-knowledge proofs prove it's still valid.

23,816 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

This is SO cool !! I just used up for voting amendment XLS-96 Confidential Transfer / privacy on the XRP Ledger dev net enabled by homomorphism and ZK proofs. What's going on here and how do nodes know payments are correct while not able to see the amounts ? 1) I issued a confidential MPT on the XRP Ledger dev net. I shielded my balance. Privacy for the amounts of my XRPL issued asset balance and transfers (the addresses stay public). No one can see the amounts, it's all shielded, except the issuer and the auditor who can always decrypt them (or you, like in the video on my esp32). 2) The XRP Ledger uses 2 boxes 📦 for this all under the hood, an Inbox-box and a Spending-box. I don't go into detail why thats needed but it's important we have it. 3) How do Validators and nodes know the transfers are correct if they can't see the amounts? Now the true magic is enabled by homomorphism. It allows to do operations arithmetic on encrypted data as if it were plaintext, without the need to decrypt it. Like adding and subtracting amounts to your balance. ZK proofs fill the gap that nodes need. We need a comparison of the balance that after you have done your payment you have >= 0 balance. If you would have negative balance it means you trying to spend more than you have something we need to prevent. For this a ZK proof is used to quickly allow people to check, ahh all good, no idea how much Vet owns but whatever he is spending here it's definitely within his balance and it's not below 0. Those 2 techniques soon on a public decentralized blockchain XRP Ledger. Should give you goose bumps what this means for possible use cases.

Vet

74,061 просмотров • 26 дней назад

MrBeast on the single biggest reason most content never reaches 100 million views: It has nothing to do with editing, production budget, or how often you post. It comes down to one thing: whether your viewer feels like they've seen it before. Think of it like a cow on the side of the road. MrBeast illustrates this with a metaphor he picked up from a TED talk: "If you're driving down the road and you just see a cow, you're probably not even going to look at it. Who cares? You've seen them all the time. But if you're driving down the road and there's a purple cow, you're going to look like four times, you're going to remember that. Like, someone could ask you a year later and you'll be like, 'Yeah, I saw a purple cow.' And the only difference is it's purple." He then maps this directly onto how content gets noticed or doesn't: "If you're scrolling through videos and it's something you've seen before, nothing too crazy, that's the equivalent of someone seeing a cow. But if it's something they've never seen before, like you putting a bunker underground and two people living in it, that is the equivalent of a purple cow." Most creators obsess over execution. MrBeast is pointing at something that comes before all of that, the idea itself. A technically flawless video built around a familiar concept is still just another cow on the side of the road. Nobody stops, remembers, or shares it. But an idea nobody has seen before? That's the purple cow. And once someone sees it, they can't unsee it.

Big Brain Business

15,037 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад