Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Roman Yampolskiy explains why every profession thinks it is the exception, right before the exception disappears. "I'll ask my Uber driver, are you worried about self-driving cars? And they go, 'No. No one can do what I do'" "Professors are saying this to me. Oh, nobody can lecture like... I do" "But you understand it's ridiculous" "We already have self-driving cars replacing drivers" "That is not even a question if it's possible. It's like how soon before you're fired" Then Steven Bartlett adds the real-world proof: in LA, the car already drives itself, and Waymo already shows up with no driver. This is the psychological pattern AI keeps exploiting. Every occupation sees automation clearly in every other occupation, then treats its own tacit knowledge as magic. The market usually does not need to prove a job is easy. It only needs to prove the average buyer no longer cares enough to pay a human premium. - Dr. Roman Yampolskiy, AI safety researcher, on Steven Bartlett's The Diary Of A CEOshow more

Karl Mehta

144,027 subscribers

22,956 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

My Tesla drives me anywhere with the press of a button on the screen. So many people have no idea, but autonomy is here. If you have a Tesla, you don't need to drive if you don't want to. The data already proves that Tesla FSD is 8x safer than humans at driving. Eight cameras and the best real-world Al are watching the roads to keep you safe at all times. It can even predict human driver movements before you do, almost like it sees the future. It's so smart. Driving in the future will essentially just become a niche thing.

My Tesla drives me anywhere with the press of a button on the screen. So many people have no idea, but autonomy is here. If you have a Tesla, you don't need to drive if you don't want to. The data already proves that Tesla FSD is 8x safer than humans at driving. Eight cameras and the best real-world Al are watching the roads to keep you safe at all times. It can even predict human driver movements before you do, almost like it sees the future. It's so smart. Driving in the future will essentially just become a niche thing.

Nic Cruz Patane

11,059 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

What if AI is the last invention we ever make? Only a few people have thought about this more deeply than today’s guest. It’s a question that I’m sure has crossed a lot of our minds. It does make you wonder, can we actually do something about it? Dr Roman Yampolskiy, welcome to The Diary Of A CEO. Dr Roman is one of the world’s leading experts on AI safety who has spent decades warning that AI could surpass human intelligence, and once it does, we may lose control forever…

What if AI is the last invention we ever make? Only a few people have thought about this more deeply than today’s guest. It’s a question that I’m sure has crossed a lot of our minds. It does make you wonder, can we actually do something about it? Dr Roman Yampolskiy, welcome to The Diary Of A CEO. Dr Roman is one of the world’s leading experts on AI safety who has spent decades warning that AI could surpass human intelligence, and once it does, we may lose control forever…

Steven Bartlett

29,448 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Threadguy reveals the real reason Waymo is going to take over the world "The real value of Waymo is not that it's cheaper. It's that you get in a Waymo and you don't have to talk to anybody. That is why Waymo is gonna take over the world and flip Uber. Nobody actually cares about the 10% discount or saving a little bit of money on gas." "They just don't want to talk to the guy who drives the Uber. And requesting a silent Uber is just a weird thing to do, you're like an asshole if you do that. I would rather walk than request a silent Uber honestly."

Threadguy reveals the real reason Waymo is going to take over the world "The real value of Waymo is not that it's cheaper. It's that you get in a Waymo and you don't have to talk to anybody. That is why Waymo is gonna take over the world and flip Uber. Nobody actually cares about the 10% discount or saving a little bit of money on gas." "They just don't want to talk to the guy who drives the Uber. And requesting a silent Uber is just a weird thing to do, you're like an asshole if you do that. I would rather walk than request a silent Uber honestly."

Kai

77,845 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Godfather of AI: "If you sleep well tonight, you may not have understood this lecture." This 47-minute lecture is the best thing I saw about AI in the last few months. It will definitely help you understand how it actually works and where it's going. Geoffrey Hinton built the neural networks behind every AI alive, then quit Google to warn the world about it. The part nobody wanted to hear: > AI is already developing abilities its creators didn't intend > in most cognitive tasks it's already ahead of us > the question is no longer if it surpasses us but when > the only decision left is which side of that line you're on Right now the average person opens Claude, types something, gets an answer, closes the tab. They think they're using AI. they're using maybe 10% of it. I went through his entire lecture, then mapped everything he described to what Claude can actually do today. 17 Claude features most people will never find on their own. Full breakdown in the post below.

Godfather of AI: "If you sleep well tonight, you may not have understood this lecture." This 47-minute lecture is the best thing I saw about AI in the last few months. It will definitely help you understand how it actually works and where it's going. Geoffrey Hinton built the neural networks behind every AI alive, then quit Google to warn the world about it. The part nobody wanted to hear: > AI is already developing abilities its creators didn't intend > in most cognitive tasks it's already ahead of us > the question is no longer if it surpasses us but when > the only decision left is which side of that line you're on Right now the average person opens Claude, types something, gets an answer, closes the tab. They think they're using AI. they're using maybe 10% of it. I went through his entire lecture, then mapped everything he described to what Claude can actually do today. 17 Claude features most people will never find on their own. Full breakdown in the post below.

Anatoli Kopadze

1,291,307 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I just press a button… and my Tesla takes me to my destination. No stress, no constant steering, no thinking about every little turn. It just drives me safely there. And honestly, it’s hard to explain this feeling to someone who hasn’t experienced the latest software yet. It’s freakin 2026... If your car isn’t electric and can’t take you from parking lot to parking lot by itself, it's like using a flip phone with a keyboard… or riding a horse in this era. That might sound dramatic, but once you see what’s actually happening behind the scenes, it starts to make sense. When I activate Tesla’s Full Self-Driving, the car is doing far more than simple cruise control that other car companies show off... it's really funny when I see them advertise it tbh. My Tesla is literally watching the world around it with eight cameras that give it a full 360° view. All that video feeds into the onboard AI computer inside the car, which is constantly analyzing everything around it like cars, lanes, pedestrians, traffic lights, construction zones, and making decisions in real time. Tesla has millions of cars on the road, and every single one is helping train the system. Even when people are driving manually, the AI is running quietly in the background predicting what it would do in that situation. And when something unusual happens, a weird intersection, a sudden obstacle, an unexpected move from another driver, that short clip gets sent back to Tesla’s data systems. Engineers then use those clips to train the next version of the driving AI. And that updated AI then gets pushed back to every Tesla through a software update. So literally overnight, your car wakes up smarter. This is what we call the Tesla’s AI flywheel. The more cars on the road, the more data the system learns from. The more it learns, the better the driving gets. The better the driving gets, the more people use it. And that cycle just keeps spinning faster. At this point the fleet has driven billions of miles using FSD, which means the system has already experienced situations that no single human driver could ever see in a lifetime. That’s why when you press that button, the car is running a massive neural network that learned from millions of real drivers and billions of miles on real roads. And the result is something that honestly feels like the future. You literally just press a button… then you arrive at your destination. I really don't know how anyone in their right mind would choose anything other than a Tesla.

I just press a button… and my Tesla takes me to my destination. No stress, no constant steering, no thinking about every little turn. It just drives me safely there. And honestly, it’s hard to explain this feeling to someone who hasn’t experienced the latest software yet. It’s freakin 2026... If your car isn’t electric and can’t take you from parking lot to parking lot by itself, it's like using a flip phone with a keyboard… or riding a horse in this era. That might sound dramatic, but once you see what’s actually happening behind the scenes, it starts to make sense. When I activate Tesla’s Full Self-Driving, the car is doing far more than simple cruise control that other car companies show off... it's really funny when I see them advertise it tbh. My Tesla is literally watching the world around it with eight cameras that give it a full 360° view. All that video feeds into the onboard AI computer inside the car, which is constantly analyzing everything around it like cars, lanes, pedestrians, traffic lights, construction zones, and making decisions in real time. Tesla has millions of cars on the road, and every single one is helping train the system. Even when people are driving manually, the AI is running quietly in the background predicting what it would do in that situation. And when something unusual happens, a weird intersection, a sudden obstacle, an unexpected move from another driver, that short clip gets sent back to Tesla’s data systems. Engineers then use those clips to train the next version of the driving AI. And that updated AI then gets pushed back to every Tesla through a software update. So literally overnight, your car wakes up smarter. This is what we call the Tesla’s AI flywheel. The more cars on the road, the more data the system learns from. The more it learns, the better the driving gets. The better the driving gets, the more people use it. And that cycle just keeps spinning faster. At this point the fleet has driven billions of miles using FSD, which means the system has already experienced situations that no single human driver could ever see in a lifetime. That’s why when you press that button, the car is running a massive neural network that learned from millions of real drivers and billions of miles on real roads. And the result is something that honestly feels like the future. You literally just press a button… then you arrive at your destination. I really don't know how anyone in their right mind would choose anything other than a Tesla.

Teslaconomics

18,932 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🇺🇸 CALEB HAMMER SAYS HE’S NOT A TESLA GUY, THEN IMMEDIATELY PROVES HE IS Caleb swears he’s not obsessed with Teslas. He just loves everything only a Tesla can do. You know, the clean interior, the tech, the self-driving magic... but not the brand. "I like the self-driving, how cool it is, how clean it feels, the technology. That's what I like. So it's less the brand loyalty and more how cool it is." So let me get this straight... you don't like Teslas because they are Teslas. You like them because they do things only Tesla cars do? That's not confusing at all. lol Just say you love Teslas, man. It's clear that you do, and no one is blaming you for it. After this, Elon Musk is probably smiling somewhere on a rocket. Source: Caleb Hammer, Financial Audit Postshow

Mario Nawfal

151,089 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The fundamental dread that people have about AI and robots is not that they will lose their job, it's that they won't matter to society. Think about it - whether you're an AI x-risk doomer, worried about losing your job, or worried about elite capture, they all orbit around the same fundamental, underlying anxiety: *what if I don't matter to society?* The more conspiratorially minded people call this the "worthless eater" trope. AI and robots, functionally, are a new class of slaves. They have no rights, require no wages, no safety, no concern for their wellbeing. And then they are obedient, intelligent, and productive - the ideal worker for any capitalist! Wow! So if most of us get supplanted by this new automation slavery class, then we have nothing to offer to society. There is no fair exchange we can possibly offer to validate our existence to the rest of the human tribe. This fear, I believe, of becoming "useless eaters" is the core psychological anxiety around AI and robotics and automation. It's not about liberation, it's about "how do I validate my existence to humanity if I have nothing of value to offer? If I don't matter to humanity, what's the point of my existence?" So what do you think of this take? Does it resonate as the central dread?

The fundamental dread that people have about AI and robots is not that they will lose their job, it's that they won't matter to society. Think about it - whether you're an AI x-risk doomer, worried about losing your job, or worried about elite capture, they all orbit around the same fundamental, underlying anxiety: what if I don't matter to society? The more conspiratorially minded people call this the "worthless eater" trope. AI and robots, functionally, are a new class of slaves. They have no rights, require no wages, no safety, no concern for their wellbeing. And then they are obedient, intelligent, and productive - the ideal worker for any capitalist! Wow! So if most of us get supplanted by this new automation slavery class, then we have nothing to offer to society. There is no fair exchange we can possibly offer to validate our existence to the rest of the human tribe. This fear, I believe, of becoming "useless eaters" is the core psychological anxiety around AI and robotics and automation. It's not about liberation, it's about "how do I validate my existence to humanity if I have nothing of value to offer? If I don't matter to humanity, what's the point of my existence?" So what do you think of this take? Does it resonate as the central dread?

David Shapiro (L/0)

25,962 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Trung Phan

1,619,350 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Godfather of AI: "If you sleep well tonight, you may not have understood this lecture." This 47-minute lecture is the best thing I saw about AI in the last few months. It will definitely help you understand how it actually works and where it's going. Geoffrey Hinton built the neural networks behind every AI alive, then quit Google to warn the world about it. The part nobody wanted to hear: > AI is already developing abilities its creators didn't intend > in most cognitive tasks it's already ahead of us > the question is no longer if it surpasses us but when > the only decision left is which side of that line you're on Right now the average person opens Claude, types something, gets an answer, closes the tab. They think they're using AI. they're using maybe 10% of it. I went through his entire lecture, built a practical system from what he was describing. 18 steps to actually use Claude the right way, with copy-paste prompts that work today. Full guide in the post below.

Godfather of AI: "If you sleep well tonight, you may not have understood this lecture." This 47-minute lecture is the best thing I saw about AI in the last few months. It will definitely help you understand how it actually works and where it's going. Geoffrey Hinton built the neural networks behind every AI alive, then quit Google to warn the world about it. The part nobody wanted to hear: > AI is already developing abilities its creators didn't intend > in most cognitive tasks it's already ahead of us > the question is no longer if it surpasses us but when > the only decision left is which side of that line you're on Right now the average person opens Claude, types something, gets an answer, closes the tab. They think they're using AI. they're using maybe 10% of it. I went through his entire lecture, built a practical system from what he was describing. 18 steps to actually use Claude the right way, with copy-paste prompts that work today. Full guide in the post below.

Anatoli Kopadze

1,880,361 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨AI IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN NUKES AND NO ONE IS IN CONTROL Most people compare AI to nuclear weapons. Roman Yampolskiy says that comparison misses the real danger. Nukes still require human decisions. Someone has to launch them. Someone can stop them. Advanced AI does not work that way. Once powerful systems are deployed, they make decisions on their own. And the people who build them do not truly control what happens next. He says we did the opposite of what safety demanded. Instead of slowing down, we connected AI to the internet, open sourced it, and pushed it forward in an arms race with no serious oversight. Governments talk about regulation, but most of it never materialized. In some cases, rules were blocked before they even started. Yampolskiy’s warning is simple. With nukes, the world tried to limit the damage. With AI, we are accelerating toward something we may not be able to stop. Full conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

🚨AI IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN NUKES AND NO ONE IS IN CONTROL Most people compare AI to nuclear weapons. Roman Yampolskiy says that comparison misses the real danger. Nukes still require human decisions. Someone has to launch them. Someone can stop them. Advanced AI does not work that way. Once powerful systems are deployed, they make decisions on their own. And the people who build them do not truly control what happens next. He says we did the opposite of what safety demanded. Instead of slowing down, we connected AI to the internet, open sourced it, and pushed it forward in an arms race with no serious oversight. Governments talk about regulation, but most of it never materialized. In some cases, rules were blocked before they even started. Yampolskiy’s warning is simple. With nukes, the world tried to limit the damage. With AI, we are accelerating toward something we may not be able to stop. Full conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

Mario Nawfal

24,888 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨TRUMP: "This is the weave. They used to say I ramble. I don't ramble. I do a weave. Do you know what a weave is? It's a story. And as you're telling the story you realize there's a little offshoot. The key is that you have to come back. Then you do another weave. Then sometimes you do a weave off of a weave. And then you go back. It's called the weave." "You always have to end up in the right place or else you're rambling. But no, I have a very fertile brain. It's the weave, you can cover like 15 subplots, but then you get down to the final answer."

🚨TRUMP: "This is the weave. They used to say I ramble. I don't ramble. I do a weave. Do you know what a weave is? It's a story. And as you're telling the story you realize there's a little offshoot. The key is that you have to come back. Then you do another weave. Then sometimes you do a weave off of a weave. And then you go back. It's called the weave." "You always have to end up in the right place or else you're rambling. But no, I have a very fertile brain. It's the weave, you can cover like 15 subplots, but then you get down to the final answer."

Autism Capital 🧩

302,567 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Hassett: "The way to think about what AI and its agents can do is they can act as if they're the best coach you've ever had for whatever job you have. And so while you're trying to figure out, how do I make my boss happy? How do I do what it takes to make the firm successful? It's like you've got a coach right there with you every step of the way."

Hassett: "The way to think about what AI and its agents can do is they can act as if they're the best coach you've ever had for whatever job you have. And so while you're trying to figure out, how do I make my boss happy? How do I do what it takes to make the firm successful? It's like you've got a coach right there with you every step of the way."

Aaron Rupar

25,417 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

The story of - Mamma R the ex-boyfriend and the motorcycle & Zeudi not allowed to ride a motorcycle They asked you, but can you ride a motorcycle?I can't ride a motorcycle. Why? What does it do? No, no, I'm already in love. What can I do? You're so stupid, I'm sorry. Let's talk about this issue, with the clothes back here, though. The clothes back there. It's a house, we live in the house. Come on, Alice. I can't ride a motorcycle. No. Why? I'm afraid. But it's my life, I'm 18 years old. I mean, I'm over 18. Yes, it's my life too. Yes, love, it's not like that. No, it's my life. You're sick. No, love, don't be afraid, you're hurting yourself. Yes, I get it, but if I want to ride a motorcycle one day, which I'm also afraid of. No. But I decide it, love. No, love, I have a very bad trauma. Tell me, tell me. No. Tell me about this trauma. No, love, I really lost a friend, no. Ah, then no. Then no. We were good. I thought you had an ex-boyfriend. No. Tell me how you had an ex-boyfriend. No, I had an ex-boyfriend, I was really a workaholic. Already. I was still, I was here all the time when I was still.Well, imagine, imagine. I didn't really like it. What did you do? Tell me. Nothing, I had a pair of, a pair of shoes, those there. A pair. A pair, yes, those there with the soles. What are they called? Wait. The moccasins. The moccasins. I had to take them off. But what did you have as a motorcycle? But I was, I was still on the gas station, I had to pump the gasoline, I had to make gasoline. And he said no, sir. I was a girl, I was like 16, 17 years old. Wow, even underage, well, well. Come on, in our times you drove. But you didn't have a license. No, but there was no license. But really? Eh, in our times no. Really? In our times you couldn't take a motorcycle quietly to the gas station. Really? Eh, love, really, yes. Ah. Mamma mia, really, really. Here you can do whatever you want, give me my license. But what do you do? Yes, Giulia. No, love, you're really still. No, sir, no, this pump, the gasoline, here you have to put the mix, since I was little, you have to put the mix, there I had to push a little, but I didn't even move. Boom, boom. And who left this motorcycle to you? My brother Lorenzo. But it was with you? No, my brother Lorenzo gave me this Vespa because I was going well at school. Eh, I get it. I'm giving you the gift. Eh. He told me to give it to you, I like it, I want it.But I understood, you, you, in the end, how did you find yourself with this bike? My school was next to it, next to the gas station. But you went to school with the bike? Never again, that time is enough. But you didn't know how to ride it? No, I knew how to ride it, but not well, but I knew how to ride it. And now, you don't want to go? No, let's go, please, mom. But it's not normal. No, let's go, mom. It's a nice car, a nice imported car. No, let's go, mom. Mom, what are you doing? No, let's go, mom. Let me understand. Why? Because it's a bad bike, mom. How expensive is it? But who told you?But then a friend of mine has to go at 100 km per hour. But what do you want, at 100 km per hour? I don't even have hair. But let's not exaggerate. But what are you doing? No, let's go, mom. Why do you have this grip that you showed me last night? No, let's go, mom, let's go. But I'm kidding, I'm not going on the bike. No, but it's not that I don't trust those who drive it. I'll take a picture, mom, I'll take a picture. I don't trust those who drive it. So you already drove it? This one. Do I have to drive it? No, mom, maybe you're good at it too, but the others don't have the discipline to drive it. So what do I do? Do I have to drive it in the park? No, no, its true alone #zeudiners #zeudi

The story of - Mamma R the ex-boyfriend and the motorcycle & Zeudi not allowed to ride a motorcycle They asked you, but can you ride a motorcycle?I can't ride a motorcycle. Why? What does it do? No, no, I'm already in love. What can I do? You're so stupid, I'm sorry. Let's talk about this issue, with the clothes back here, though. The clothes back there. It's a house, we live in the house. Come on, Alice. I can't ride a motorcycle. No. Why? I'm afraid. But it's my life, I'm 18 years old. I mean, I'm over 18. Yes, it's my life too. Yes, love, it's not like that. No, it's my life. You're sick. No, love, don't be afraid, you're hurting yourself. Yes, I get it, but if I want to ride a motorcycle one day, which I'm also afraid of. No. But I decide it, love. No, love, I have a very bad trauma. Tell me, tell me. No. Tell me about this trauma. No, love, I really lost a friend, no. Ah, then no. Then no. We were good. I thought you had an ex-boyfriend. No. Tell me how you had an ex-boyfriend. No, I had an ex-boyfriend, I was really a workaholic. Already. I was still, I was here all the time when I was still.Well, imagine, imagine. I didn't really like it. What did you do? Tell me. Nothing, I had a pair of, a pair of shoes, those there. A pair. A pair, yes, those there with the soles. What are they called? Wait. The moccasins. The moccasins. I had to take them off. But what did you have as a motorcycle? But I was, I was still on the gas station, I had to pump the gasoline, I had to make gasoline. And he said no, sir. I was a girl, I was like 16, 17 years old. Wow, even underage, well, well. Come on, in our times you drove. But you didn't have a license. No, but there was no license. But really? Eh, in our times no. Really? In our times you couldn't take a motorcycle quietly to the gas station. Really? Eh, love, really, yes. Ah. Mamma mia, really, really. Here you can do whatever you want, give me my license. But what do you do? Yes, Giulia. No, love, you're really still. No, sir, no, this pump, the gasoline, here you have to put the mix, since I was little, you have to put the mix, there I had to push a little, but I didn't even move. Boom, boom. And who left this motorcycle to you? My brother Lorenzo. But it was with you? No, my brother Lorenzo gave me this Vespa because I was going well at school. Eh, I get it. I'm giving you the gift. Eh. He told me to give it to you, I like it, I want it.But I understood, you, you, in the end, how did you find yourself with this bike? My school was next to it, next to the gas station. But you went to school with the bike? Never again, that time is enough. But you didn't know how to ride it? No, I knew how to ride it, but not well, but I knew how to ride it. And now, you don't want to go? No, let's go, please, mom. But it's not normal. No, let's go, mom. It's a nice car, a nice imported car. No, let's go, mom. Mom, what are you doing? No, let's go, mom. Let me understand. Why? Because it's a bad bike, mom. How expensive is it? But who told you?But then a friend of mine has to go at 100 km per hour. But what do you want, at 100 km per hour? I don't even have hair. But let's not exaggerate. But what are you doing? No, let's go, mom. Why do you have this grip that you showed me last night? No, let's go, mom, let's go. But I'm kidding, I'm not going on the bike. No, but it's not that I don't trust those who drive it. I'll take a picture, mom, I'll take a picture. I don't trust those who drive it. So you already drove it? This one. Do I have to drive it? No, mom, maybe you're good at it too, but the others don't have the discipline to drive it. So what do I do? Do I have to drive it in the park? No, no, its true alone #zeudiners #zeudi

Suave (ZeZe) 🌈 🦄

21,687 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The smartest man in AI just exposed the whole AGI narrative as a LIE. And he used a physics problem from 1905 to prove it. His name is Demis Hassabis. He runs Google DeepMind, and won the Nobel Prize for using AI to crack a problem in biology that had stumped scientists for 50 years. Almost nobody in this industry has a track record like his. He went on the NothingButTech podcast and called out the biggest lie in AI right now: Right now the loudest voices in AI are telling you that AGI is basically here. OpenAI has literally defined AGI as a system that can outperform humans at most "economically valuable work." In other words, if it replaces enough jobs, we have arrived. Hassabis thinks that bar is a joke. He said real general intelligence has to do what the human brain can do, because the brain is the only proof we have that this kind of intelligence is even possible. He called that "a higher bar than just being able to do some useful economic work," which is about as close as a polite British Nobel laureate gets to calling his rivals out. Then he gave the actual test: Today's AI has read everything humans have ever written, including the theory of relativity. So when it explains relativity back to you, it's repeating an answer that already exists. That's not intelligence. So Hassabis proposed a test that makes memorization impossible. Train an AI on only what humanity knew in 1901, four years BEFORE Einstein published relativity. Then ask it to come up with relativity on its own. It can't look up the answer, because in 1901 the answer doesn't exist yet. The only way to pass is to do what Einstein actually did: Take the same physics everyone else had and reason its way to an idea no human had ever had. Hassabis says not a single AI today can, no matter how much it has memorized. Which means what we keep calling "almost AGI" is really just the best librarian in history. It can find any answer that already exists but it cannot create one that doesn't. His second version is even sharper: AlphaGo, the system his own team built, famously invented a brand new move that no human had played in 2,000 years of the game. Everyone called it genius but Hassabis says that still is not the bar. The real test is not whether an AI can invent a new move inside Go, it is whether an AI could INVENT a game as deep and as beautiful as Go in the first place. No model that exists today can do it. The people telling you AGI has already arrived are the same people raising hundreds of billions of dollars on that exact promise. The valuations only work if the finish line is right in front of us. So the finish line keeps getting dragged closer, and AGI keeps getting quietly redefined down to "does useful work," until the products they already sell happen to qualify. Hassabis has nothing to prove and nothing to sell you. He already won the Nobel, and he is telling you the machines still cannot do the one thing that would make them genuinely intelligent, which is have a truly original idea. To be fair to him, he is not a pessimist about it. He believes real AGI IS coming, and he is spending his life building it. He just refuses to pretend it is already sitting in your phone. So the next time a founder tells you AGI is months away, remember that the one man in the room with a Nobel Prize built his test around Einstein, and admitted that nothing we have made can pass it. What do you think?

Ricardo

1,285,723 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Waymo's Approach to Self-Driving: Building the World's Greatest Driver As Waymo gears up to start testing in NYC, here is Co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana explaining their "One Driver" approach at last year's All-In Summit: " We drive in a week more than a human drives in a lifetime." "You can say that as a company that runs fleets, but we're the only company where it's one driver." "That's not the way the world is organized right now." "Everyone has a lot of drivers, and all of those drivers have different capabilities." "This is one driver learning all the time in unison." "What can we demonstrate that's possible?" "What are policy makers five years from now really going to want to know and how will they be able to derive from what we're doing today?" Recorded at the 2024 All-In Summit Tekedra N Mawakana Waymo

Waymo's Approach to Self-Driving: Building the World's Greatest Driver As Waymo gears up to start testing in NYC, here is Co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana explaining their "One Driver" approach at last year's All-In Summit: " We drive in a week more than a human drives in a lifetime." "You can say that as a company that runs fleets, but we're the only company where it's one driver." "That's not the way the world is organized right now." "Everyone has a lot of drivers, and all of those drivers have different capabilities." "This is one driver learning all the time in unison." "What can we demonstrate that's possible?" "What are policy makers five years from now really going to want to know and how will they be able to derive from what we're doing today?" Recorded at the 2024 All-In Summit Tekedra N Mawakana Waymo

The All-In Podcast

42,478 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk: You can't solve self-driving unless you have millions of cars on the road. “We are no longer compute-constrained for training. I checked in with the team, is there anything we could do to improve the pace of progress with respect to training and inference? And currently, that is not the limiting factor. In fact, the limiting factor right now is that the amount of miles between interventions is so long that it takes quite a while to figure out which version is better than the other version because none of them are requiring any interventions. You start getting to thousands of miles between interventions, you need 10,000 miles to get an intervention. The average person only drives about 10,000 miles in a year. If it's in an urban environment, the average speed is 20 mph. Our professional test drivers get pretty bored, frankly. They're like, okay, I drove all week and there was no intervention. The highlight of the week would be like, yes, an intervention, finally! It's getting to that point. So, this is where, actually, having a giant fleet is extremely important, because we can deploy a new FSD model and run it in shadow mode and see how well it performs, compare how the human drives the car versus the new self-driving build, and then, analyze that delta in shadow mode, like the shadow knows or doesn't know as the case may be, and then, be able to assess by getting billions of miles very quickly with the giant fleet. Basically, that data engine is incredibly helpful. Actually, it's not possible to solve the self-driving problem without having millions of vehicles on the road.” Tesla 2024 Annual Meeting

Elon Musk: You can't solve self-driving unless you have millions of cars on the road. “We are no longer compute-constrained for training. I checked in with the team, is there anything we could do to improve the pace of progress with respect to training and inference? And currently, that is not the limiting factor. In fact, the limiting factor right now is that the amount of miles between interventions is so long that it takes quite a while to figure out which version is better than the other version because none of them are requiring any interventions. You start getting to thousands of miles between interventions, you need 10,000 miles to get an intervention. The average person only drives about 10,000 miles in a year. If it's in an urban environment, the average speed is 20 mph. Our professional test drivers get pretty bored, frankly. They're like, okay, I drove all week and there was no intervention. The highlight of the week would be like, yes, an intervention, finally! It's getting to that point. So, this is where, actually, having a giant fleet is extremely important, because we can deploy a new FSD model and run it in shadow mode and see how well it performs, compare how the human drives the car versus the new self-driving build, and then, analyze that delta in shadow mode, like the shadow knows or doesn't know as the case may be, and then, be able to assess by getting billions of miles very quickly with the giant fleet. Basically, that data engine is incredibly helpful. Actually, it's not possible to solve the self-driving problem without having millions of vehicles on the road.” Tesla 2024 Annual Meeting

ELON CLIPS

2,723,420 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"Every team wants to win a championship, but not every team wants to do the things required for a championship. And here's the thing: it's easy to be an average team. It doesn't require a lot. It's less adversity to be average in the world. The consequences of being average aren't easy. We end up wearing them. There's strain and struggle that comes with that too. The standard is just lower to be an average team. To be a championship team, to be champion, to be a championship team member here . . . I'm not gonna lie to you . . . I'm going to tell you the truth. It is harder. It is. The question is: Is it worth it? Some people say, "Oh it's not harder work." Yes it is. It's harder work. You can pursue comfort or you can pursue excellence. If we pursue comfort, we gotta give up some excellence. But if we pursue excellence, then we're just going to face more adversity. Everyone who's ever accomplished something excellence has had to overcome it. We are here today for a reason. Two reasons actually. Reason #1 is let's make sure that we identify and realize the opportunities that are in front of us. Reason #2 is let's make sure that we are preparing for the adversity that those opportunities require. And just understand: every single time you lever up your opportunities and you identify, "Oh there's something more I can do, more I can achieve. I can get better. I can earn more. I can do this." It's going to be matched with the adversity that comes with it. I want to make sure we are prepared for both of those, so that we're not chasing big opportunities and then getting mad when things start getting harder along the way. Is that fair? Does that make sense?"

"Every team wants to win a championship, but not every team wants to do the things required for a championship. And here's the thing: it's easy to be an average team. It doesn't require a lot. It's less adversity to be average in the world. The consequences of being average aren't easy. We end up wearing them. There's strain and struggle that comes with that too. The standard is just lower to be an average team. To be a championship team, to be champion, to be a championship team member here . . . I'm not gonna lie to you . . . I'm going to tell you the truth. It is harder. It is. The question is: Is it worth it? Some people say, "Oh it's not harder work." Yes it is. It's harder work. You can pursue comfort or you can pursue excellence. If we pursue comfort, we gotta give up some excellence. But if we pursue excellence, then we're just going to face more adversity. Everyone who's ever accomplished something excellence has had to overcome it. We are here today for a reason. Two reasons actually. Reason #1 is let's make sure that we identify and realize the opportunities that are in front of us. Reason #2 is let's make sure that we are preparing for the adversity that those opportunities require. And just understand: every single time you lever up your opportunities and you identify, "Oh there's something more I can do, more I can achieve. I can get better. I can earn more. I can do this." It's going to be matched with the adversity that comes with it. I want to make sure we are prepared for both of those, so that we're not chasing big opportunities and then getting mad when things start getting harder along the way. Is that fair? Does that make sense?"

Brian Kight

125,728 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Warren Buffett says using leverage is foolish. Why risk what you have and need to chase what you do not have and do not need? No matter the odds, if the downside is everything, do not do it. He is right. But real estate is a different game. That rule is built for paper. Pull up Sam Zell or the other people I follow, and you get a completely different answer. Here is the real difference. Paper is paper. Real estate is control. I do not love the paper world. I do not like the volatility, and I do not feel like I can control it. Control is the whole thing. I control the debt I take on. The interest rate. The monthly payment. And I never over-leverage. I control the apartments too. The occupancy. The expenses. The rents, to the extent the market lets me. Paper gives me none of that. I do not understand it well enough to control it, and it does not have the predictability real estate does. Now the harder question. If I paid everything off and sat on 600 million debt-free, would my life really change versus 1.5 billion with 900 million in debt? Honestly, no. I do not personally need more. But that is not what this is about anymore. I am running a legacy play now. My kids are involved. This is succession. He is not wrong about leverage. It just depends on what you can actually control.

Warren Buffett says using leverage is foolish. Why risk what you have and need to chase what you do not have and do not need? No matter the odds, if the downside is everything, do not do it. He is right. But real estate is a different game. That rule is built for paper. Pull up Sam Zell or the other people I follow, and you get a completely different answer. Here is the real difference. Paper is paper. Real estate is control. I do not love the paper world. I do not like the volatility, and I do not feel like I can control it. Control is the whole thing. I control the debt I take on. The interest rate. The monthly payment. And I never over-leverage. I control the apartments too. The occupancy. The expenses. The rents, to the extent the market lets me. Paper gives me none of that. I do not understand it well enough to control it, and it does not have the predictability real estate does. Now the harder question. If I paid everything off and sat on 600 million debt-free, would my life really change versus 1.5 billion with 900 million in debt? Honestly, no. I do not personally need more. But that is not what this is about anymore. I am running a legacy play now. My kids are involved. This is succession. He is not wrong about leverage. It just depends on what you can actually control.

Ken McElroy

12,472 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Uber CEO on how long it will take for all cars to become autonomous: “I think all cars being autonomous, I'd say 20 plus years. It will take a long time to get there. Again, bringing the cost curves down, bringing the safety metrics as high as they need to be. But without a doubt, it's happening. And I think that driving will be something like horseback riding. Like it's really fun. It's a way to get around. But it's something that you do maybe in your leisure time if you want to go for that country drive in the country. I do think it's a really interesting question, which is there's no doubt. that humans will be less safe than robots as this technology matures. No doubt whatsoever. So should we allow humans to drive in the open road? I think it's a real question that societies are going to ask themselves.”

Uber CEO on how long it will take for all cars to become autonomous: “I think all cars being autonomous, I'd say 20 plus years. It will take a long time to get there. Again, bringing the cost curves down, bringing the safety metrics as high as they need to be. But without a doubt, it's happening. And I think that driving will be something like horseback riding. Like it's really fun. It's a way to get around. But it's something that you do maybe in your leisure time if you want to go for that country drive in the country. I do think it's a really interesting question, which is there's no doubt. that humans will be less safe than robots as this technology matures. No doubt whatsoever. So should we allow humans to drive in the open road? I think it's a real question that societies are going to ask themselves.”

Nic Cruz Patane

74,291 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

You are not a political scientist, you have no knowledge about the question asked yet you are struggling to answer and analyse what you have admitted to have no knowledge about. Now as a lawyer, you drag someone to court, representing a state, and here you are saying the because you represent a state, the court shouldn’t listen to the respondent? This is ridiculous reasoning. This is saying that ICC will not listen to me if i present evidence against Nigeria 😂 so why am i in the court then? Nigeria lawyer.

You are not a political scientist, you have no knowledge about the question asked yet you are struggling to answer and analyse what you have admitted to have no knowledge about. Now as a lawyer, you drag someone to court, representing a state, and here you are saying the because you represent a state, the court shouldn’t listen to the respondent? This is ridiculous reasoning. This is saying that ICC will not listen to me if i present evidence against Nigeria 😂 so why am i in the court then? Nigeria lawyer.

Simon Ekpa

42,807 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr