Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

. Robert Hackett on why the "autonomous" in DAO finally works: “People would talk about it as a group chat with a bank account. But they had higher aspirations than that: maybe you could have an internet-native organization where people all over the world coordinate via decentralized protocols.” “AI...

33,844 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

17 Kommentare

Profilbild von Nave Finance
Nave Financevor 2 Monaten

@rhackett We are building this!

Profilbild von Boson
Bosonvor 2 Monaten

@rhackett Autonomous DAOs need more than a group chat with a bank account. They need a secure commerce layer to transact value and execute deals. That's the trust layer Boson's decentralized Agentic Commerce Protocol has been shipping since 2021.

Profilbild von Cryptokkdi
Cryptokkdivor 2 Monaten

@rhackett Pls review @NaveDotFinance - it”s exactly doing what is discussed here .

Profilbild von Rhea Finance
Rhea Financevor 2 Monaten

@rhackett The best autonomous systems will hide complexity for ppl, not add more of it

Profilbild von Anton Illarionov
Anton Illarionovvor 2 Monaten

@rhackett 💯

Profilbild von BlockBooster
BlockBoostervor 2 Monaten

@rhackett The weak point in DAOs was never the treasury. Rather, it was the amount of human coordination required to accomplish anything useful.

Profilbild von Jason傑森 🇭🇰 | 🛠️
Jason傑森 🇭🇰 | 🛠️vor 2 Monaten

@rhackett 这还是纯去中心化的概念吧

Profilbild von $BTC
$BTCvor 2 Monaten

@rhackett DAO will be the orgs of new era. Right cordination that creates high value at scale is what we are building towards at @surge_dao. We'd love to have you more involved and build towards the future ✌

Profilbild von Evolution
Evolutionvor 2 Monaten

@rhackett solana:EGg56E1YtL5YapzkF7vkRThHR8i5FeRvm2LLuySdYory is changing the game, look into it!

Profilbild von Ramsey
Ramseyvor 2 Monaten

DAOs don't work because the average participant doesn't know what's best for the whole (due to a variety of factors) Even if you get AI to ingest and surface information in a completely objective manner, with full provenance of outputs, the above still stands. And even if you have AI make proposals and suggest courses of action, the above still stands, but this time participants become lazier. We should just leave DAOs in the past lol

Profilbild von Quirky_rogue
Quirky_roguevor 2 Monaten

@rhackett The hard part isn't the autonomy though—it's actually getting people to *not* override it when a 10x opportunity or crisis hits and consensus breaks down. How do DAOs handle that without reverting to founder veto?

Profilbild von Hajdbd
Hajdbdvor 2 Monaten

@rhackett Nice

Profilbild von FairClub
FairClubvor 2 Monaten

@rhackett Let the autonomous side of things actually be put to work and now with AI, it'll scale beyond what you and I imagine

Profilbild von Swati Priya
Swati Priyavor 2 Monaten

@rhackett The “autonomous” part of DAOs may have been waiting for AI all along.

Profilbild von Blocsys Technologies
Blocsys Technologiesvor 2 Monaten

@rhackett Love this framing — "group chat with a bank account" is such a perfect gut-check for what most DAOs actually became vs. what they could be. Coordination infrastructure for people who've never met is genuinely wild when it works. 🌍

Profilbild von CryptoNS
CryptoNSvor 2 Monaten

@rhackett $NAVE is literally building this right now @NaveDotFinance with an amazing dev @RetaleSOL

Profilbild von Kath L
Kath Lvor 2 Monaten

@rhackett The reason DAOs suck and don't work is not because the busy work is not automated

Ähnliche Videos

🚨HARSH TRUTH: AI WILL TAKE YOUR JOB!!! And Elon Musk thinks that might actually be a good thing. Sounds crazy at first. But his logic is simple. Most people don’t work because they love their job. They work because they have to. Rent. Food. Bills. That’s the deal. Your job was never really your dream. It was the price of survival. Elon believes AI and robots could eventually break that deal. And he’s not just talking about it. He’s actively building the technology that could make it happen. Tesla is building Optimus, a humanoid robot designed to do physical labor. Tesla’s AI is being trained to automate more and more real world tasks. Starlink is bringing internet to places that never had access before. And SpaceX is pushing the cost of launching things into space lower than ever. All of this points to one direction. A world where machines produce far more than humans ever could. If machines produce almost everything, the cost of producing things collapses. And when production becomes incredibly cheap, the cost of living drops with it. Elon compares the future of money to air. Nobody checks their bank account to see if they still have air. It’s just there. One day, he believes money could feel the same way. He calls it Universal High Income. Not just survival payments. A world where the basics of life become abundant. Food. Housing. Healthcare. But Elon isn’t celebrating this future. He’s worried about something else. Because once machines can do everything better than humans, money stops being the biggest problem. The real problem becomes meaning. For most people, work is where their sense of value comes from. Their role. Their identity. Their reason to feel useful. Take that away and a lot of people won’t know who they are. As Elon once said: “If the computer can do everything better than you, does your life have meaning?” AI might solve the money problem. But it could create the biggest meaning crisis in human history.

Evan Luthra

23,003 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten