正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Roger Ebert on Louis Malle's "Damage" (1992): "Watching 'Damage' (1992) is like watching an emotional traffic accident as it unfolds. The film is based on the best seller by Josephine Hart, which had a certain undeniable power, but the right place for this material is the screen, I think,...

39,978 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Roger Penrose, Nobel Prize-winning physicist and mathematician, explains why we should stop calling it AI and start calling it "artificial cleverness": He believes the entire field is mislabelled, and the label itself is doing damage. His objection is simple but cuts deep: "The name is wrong. It's not artificial intelligence. It's not intelligence. Intelligence would involve consciousness. Well, if it's a machine, it's not conscious." For Penrose, people have confused raw computing power with genuine understanding. "People have lost the plot. They've lost it in the power of computing. The thing is that computers have got so powerful that they've lost the thread of what they're doing. But I think consciousness is something different. It's not computational." He believes the term itself has hypnotized people into a category error: "People are so hypnotized. The trouble is that AI is a bad term. It means artificial intelligence. Now intelligence in my view is conscious. That's what intelligence is about." So he proposes a rename. Artificial Cleverness. AC instead of AI. To illustrate the distinction, Penrose draws on his experience teaching mathematics: "You have mathematics students. Some of them understand what they're doing. Some are just clever. They can repeat what they've learned. They know how to do it very cleverly. They can calculate very well, but they don't necessarily understand what they're doing." That gap, between calculating well and actually understanding, is the gap Penrose sees between today's machines and genuine intelligence. Cleverness can be manufactured. Consciousness, in his view, cannot. So the question worth sitting with: when we call a system "intelligent," are we describing what it does, or quietly assuming something about what it is?

Big Brain AI

117,657 次观看 • 2 个月前

Conservative by Blood. My grandparents survived the Korean War, not because life was merciful, but because geography drew a thin line between freedom and a prison with no walls. I think of Yeonmi Park. She is not a distant cousin. She could have been me. I could have been her. If the border were drawn differently, my life would be measured in inches of height lost, pounds of flesh missing, and years stolen by famine. This is not an abstract policy debate. It is bone, marrow, and memory. It is the reason my conservatism is not a hobby, a hashtag, or a choice. It is survival encoded in DNA. So when you tell me you “hate communism,” I ask: do you know what communism means? Do you know the silence of a church outlawed, the emptiness of a child’s stomach, the weight of a government that tells you your soul does not belong to Christ but to the Party? If you truly care about humanity, you cannot flirt with Marxist dreams. You cannot soften tyranny with new names. Communism is not theory. It is graves without markers. It is families broken by borders. It is a people who look like me, but live as shadows of who they should have been, if they live at all. And if words aren’t enough, listen to Yeonmi Park. She tells how in North Korea, people ate rats who had eaten the flesh of surgery’s failed and forgotten a cycle of hunger so dark, it devours even the dead. That is communism. That is why I am conservative by blood. And the blood remembers. So when liberals approach me at work and expect me to fall in line just because I’m not white, it takes every fiber in my being not to be violent. They don’t know what they’re talking about. They don’t know what they want. They don’t know how this ends. I do. History does. I remember my ancestors. I know what they endured. It is not a hard decision. Their struggle was not about transgenderism, not about late term abortions. It was about life itself. About real freedom. And it is the easiest decision in the world.

Sovey

2,169,295 次观看 • 10 个月前