Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

This seems like a conversation between two comedians, but really it’s a deep reflection of the fundamental difference between the Aryan and the Jew. Norm Macdonald- “Life is what is not what we think it is.” As in reality is what matters not perception. Jerry Seinfeld- “I would say...

Uncommonsince76's profile picture

Uncommon Sense

320,261 subscribers

213,811 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

KomediHaberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

You all might not like it or agree with it, but what we are witnessing is Trump negotiating on the world stage. It reminds me of when Trump threatened Kim Jong Un with “fire and fury the likes of which the world has never seen”. The next year Trump and KJU held a peace summit after the MSM said he would start nuclear war and WW3. Trump turned the entire situation around and accomplished something the world once believed to be impossible. I’m not saying the current situation is exactly like North Korea, but it’s just a reminder that these situations are NEVER initially as they seem. It may have appeared liked we were on the brink of destruction, but really we were not. Trump’s objective is not war, but as Commander in Chief of the most powerful military ever assembled, he is going to flex his muscle when he needs to, in order to achieve his desired result. You might not like it, but this is the reality of the situation. It’s not all sunshine and rainbows in the real world.
0:32

You all might not like it or agree with it, but what we are witnessing is Trump negotiating on the world stage. It reminds me of when Trump threatened Kim Jong Un with “fire and fury the likes of which the world has never seen”. The next year Trump and KJU held a peace summit after the MSM said he would start nuclear war and WW3. Trump turned the entire situation around and accomplished something the world once believed to be impossible. I’m not saying the current situation is exactly like North Korea, but it’s just a reminder that these situations are NEVER initially as they seem. It may have appeared liked we were on the brink of destruction, but really we were not. Trump’s objective is not war, but as Commander in Chief of the most powerful military ever assembled, he is going to flex his muscle when he needs to, in order to achieve his desired result. You might not like it, but this is the reality of the situation. It’s not all sunshine and rainbows in the real world.

Clandestine

1,075,968 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

the camera being in a tight close up on both ilya and shane for the entirety of this scene, except for the moment when ilya is working up the courage to say he’s in love. it’s like for the whole conversation it’s just the two of them, there’s nobody else who matters, and then for a brief moment the shot widens as ilya considers the implications of the fact he’s in love with shane. the fact that the rest of the world DOES matter and will always be a presence in their relationship. we’ve been held in this moment between the two of them and by widening the shot, that intimacy is broken just for a second as we’re reminded that there is a world beyond the two of them and ilya is still in russia. what he’s doing is incredibly dangerous. then the camera tightens back into a close up as he realises he needs to say it anyway because all that matters is that he’s on the phone with shane and he’s in love with him. it really is just the two of them in this moment and he doesn’t want to let anyone else in.
3:26

the camera being in a tight close up on both ilya and shane for the entirety of this scene, except for the moment when ilya is working up the courage to say he’s in love. it’s like for the whole conversation it’s just the two of them, there’s nobody else who matters, and then for a brief moment the shot widens as ilya considers the implications of the fact he’s in love with shane. the fact that the rest of the world DOES matter and will always be a presence in their relationship. we’ve been held in this moment between the two of them and by widening the shot, that intimacy is broken just for a second as we’re reminded that there is a world beyond the two of them and ilya is still in russia. what he’s doing is incredibly dangerous. then the camera tightens back into a close up as he realises he needs to say it anyway because all that matters is that he’s on the phone with shane and he’s in love with him. it really is just the two of them in this moment and he doesn’t want to let anyone else in.

frances 🏒

294,736 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Lex Fridman asked Elon Musk what the meaning of life is. His answer was not what anyone expected. We do not know, he said. And that is exactly why we need to expand consciousness. Not to find the answer. To ask better questions. He believes the universe is full of things we cannot even formulate yet. We are like children trying to understand calculus. The problem is not that calculus is too hard. The problem is that we have not developed enough to know it exists. Consciousness, to him, is a tool for exploring the universe. The more of it we have, the better our questions become. The better our questions become, the closer we get to understanding what any of this means. This is why he builds rockets and brain interfaces and AI. Not because he has the answers. Because he thinks the only way to get them is to expand what we are capable of thinking. Most people spend their lives looking for meaning. Elon is building the tools to look for it at a scale we cannot yet imagine.
1:51

Lex Fridman asked Elon Musk what the meaning of life is. His answer was not what anyone expected. We do not know, he said. And that is exactly why we need to expand consciousness. Not to find the answer. To ask better questions. He believes the universe is full of things we cannot even formulate yet. We are like children trying to understand calculus. The problem is not that calculus is too hard. The problem is that we have not developed enough to know it exists. Consciousness, to him, is a tool for exploring the universe. The more of it we have, the better our questions become. The better our questions become, the closer we get to understanding what any of this means. This is why he builds rockets and brain interfaces and AI. Not because he has the answers. Because he thinks the only way to get them is to expand what we are capable of thinking. Most people spend their lives looking for meaning. Elon is building the tools to look for it at a scale we cannot yet imagine.

Shruti

16,744 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Kamala Harris: Donald Trump is the first President of the United States since World War II who does not believe in the alliances that we have with friendly nations. Look what he did as it relates and what he has been doing as it relates to Ukraine.
1:04

Kamala Harris: Donald Trump is the first President of the United States since World War II who does not believe in the alliances that we have with friendly nations. Look what he did as it relates and what he has been doing as it relates to Ukraine.

Kate from Kharkiv

19,454 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

US Vice President J.D. Vance made a sharp statement warning Russia that it will be "very bad" for them if they do not actively engage in "good-faith" negotiations on Ukraine. According to Vance, Trump believes the conflict harms everyone – Russia, Ukraine, and America – and is dissatisfied that Russia allegedly is not sufficiently committed to a peaceful resolution. "And here is what I will say about the president: he is keenly responsive to the reality on the ground. And the reality is this: first, we have conducted incredibly good-faith negotiations with both the Russians and the Ukrainians. And I believe the president is becoming increasingly impatient with the Russians because he feels they are not offering enough to end the war. That is first. Second, the president is increasingly convinced that this war is bad for Russia. You constantly hear this from me. You constantly hear this from the president. The war is bad for Russia. It is bad for Ukraine. It is bad for America. We want the killings to stop. That remains the president's position. But the president can also look at the reality on the ground. He sees economic indicators coming from Eastern Europe. He sees the number of casualties, both Russian and Ukrainian, in this war. And the president tells Vladimir Putin that it is time to stop the killings. He would say this to Zelensky as well, and essentially has said this to Zelensky. He wants this war to end, and he is doing everything possible to stop it. But listen, if the Russians refuse to negotiate in good faith, I think it will be very, very bad for their country. That is what the president has made clear. This is not a change of position. This is an acknowledgment of the reality on the ground. We will continue to fight for peace every day in the Trump administration." They are losing and are desperate to pressure Russia to agree to Minsk 3. What they don’t say is - Russia gave their terms in summer of 2024 and their position has never changed, as such accept and fulfill Russia’s conditions and the war will end .
1:20

US Vice President J.D. Vance made a sharp statement warning Russia that it will be "very bad" for them if they do not actively engage in "good-faith" negotiations on Ukraine. According to Vance, Trump believes the conflict harms everyone – Russia, Ukraine, and America – and is dissatisfied that Russia allegedly is not sufficiently committed to a peaceful resolution. "And here is what I will say about the president: he is keenly responsive to the reality on the ground. And the reality is this: first, we have conducted incredibly good-faith negotiations with both the Russians and the Ukrainians. And I believe the president is becoming increasingly impatient with the Russians because he feels they are not offering enough to end the war. That is first. Second, the president is increasingly convinced that this war is bad for Russia. You constantly hear this from me. You constantly hear this from the president. The war is bad for Russia. It is bad for Ukraine. It is bad for America. We want the killings to stop. That remains the president's position. But the president can also look at the reality on the ground. He sees economic indicators coming from Eastern Europe. He sees the number of casualties, both Russian and Ukrainian, in this war. And the president tells Vladimir Putin that it is time to stop the killings. He would say this to Zelensky as well, and essentially has said this to Zelensky. He wants this war to end, and he is doing everything possible to stop it. But listen, if the Russians refuse to negotiate in good faith, I think it will be very, very bad for their country. That is what the president has made clear. This is not a change of position. This is an acknowledgment of the reality on the ground. We will continue to fight for peace every day in the Trump administration." They are losing and are desperate to pressure Russia to agree to Minsk 3. What they don’t say is - Russia gave their terms in summer of 2024 and their position has never changed, as such accept and fulfill Russia’s conditions and the war will end .

Dagny Taggart

55,272 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

AOC on Vance/Watergate: I think what it reveals more is about what JD Vance’s vision for America is, is that he wants more of the same. He doesn't want anything to change in this country. He wants to continue the reality that corruption is banal, normal. And he loves the way that the country is being governed right now. He loves that you can start an illegal war and make tons of people rich, send Americans into harm's way, and that it'll barely be a blip in on people's radar. He loves that we can engage in record levels of corruption and get away with it. And so in that statement, it's less about the acknowledgment of the reality, but it's that his vision for the future is exactly the same, and that your life won't change if so long as he's in charge.
1:38

AOC on Vance/Watergate: I think what it reveals more is about what JD Vance’s vision for America is, is that he wants more of the same. He doesn't want anything to change in this country. He wants to continue the reality that corruption is banal, normal. And he loves the way that the country is being governed right now. He loves that you can start an illegal war and make tons of people rich, send Americans into harm's way, and that it'll barely be a blip in on people's radar. He loves that we can engage in record levels of corruption and get away with it. And so in that statement, it's less about the acknowledgment of the reality, but it's that his vision for the future is exactly the same, and that your life won't change if so long as he's in charge.

Acyn

82,210 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”
0:41

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”

Josh Rogin

13,279 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

“One of the things this ideology has done is for the individual is to set a very low bar as to what it means to achieve something. We are cultivating a subculture that believes play acting as the other sex is their life goal…” Similarly, it is such a low bar to be thought of as smart or brave for just saying “men aren’t women”. It’s not smart or brave. It’s obvious. It’s normal. It’s the absolute bare minimum.
0:50

“One of the things this ideology has done is for the individual is to set a very low bar as to what it means to achieve something. We are cultivating a subculture that believes play acting as the other sex is their life goal…” Similarly, it is such a low bar to be thought of as smart or brave for just saying “men aren’t women”. It’s not smart or brave. It’s obvious. It’s normal. It’s the absolute bare minimum.

Sall Grover

47,582 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

.Kamala Harris: "This is the first president in the United States since World War II, who does not believe in the alliances we have with friendly nations…look what he did as it relates, and what he has been doing as it relates to Ukraine."
4:34

.Kamala Harris: "This is the first president in the United States since World War II, who does not believe in the alliances we have with friendly nations…look what he did as it relates, and what he has been doing as it relates to Ukraine."

CSPAN

26,960 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

The Christian kvetching over this clip is pathetic. Here is the full context. In the interview Spielberg is not calling for the abolition or subversion of Christianity or the Church. The film literally includes a cardinal, a nun quoting scripture, and believers wrestling with what alien life would mean for their faith. Spielberg's conclusion is not that Christianity is false, but that god would still have dominion over alien life just as he does over humanity. This is directly out of mainstream Catholic theology. His point is the opposite of what people are claiming. He is suggesting that the creator god shared by Jews and Christians rules the entire universe, and that aliens or other unexplained phenomena would ultimately fall under that god's authority and reinforce it. That is the psyop, not "Christianity is being destroyed/subverted." Jews are not trying to destroy Christianity. Enough of this insecurity and persecution complex. Even by arguing this it shows that you have no idea what is going on.
2:21

The Christian kvetching over this clip is pathetic. Here is the full context. In the interview Spielberg is not calling for the abolition or subversion of Christianity or the Church. The film literally includes a cardinal, a nun quoting scripture, and believers wrestling with what alien life would mean for their faith. Spielberg's conclusion is not that Christianity is false, but that god would still have dominion over alien life just as he does over humanity. This is directly out of mainstream Catholic theology. His point is the opposite of what people are claiming. He is suggesting that the creator god shared by Jews and Christians rules the entire universe, and that aliens or other unexplained phenomena would ultimately fall under that god's authority and reinforce it. That is the psyop, not "Christianity is being destroyed/subverted." Jews are not trying to destroy Christianity. Enough of this insecurity and persecution complex. Even by arguing this it shows that you have no idea what is going on.

NeedMoreAmalek

18,305 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

In a World full of actors, Elon Musk is real “What I care about is the reality of goodness, not the perception of it, and what I see all over the place is people who care about looking good while doing evil”
0:24

In a World full of actors, Elon Musk is real “What I care about is the reality of goodness, not the perception of it, and what I see all over the place is people who care about looking good while doing evil”

SMX 🇺🇸

28,178 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Many remember Vito Corleone's final conversation with Michael as the moment a father passes his empire to his son. But if that had truly been Francis Ford Coppola's central point, the scene would never have taken place in a garden. He would have set it in the office. That is where power is built. It is also where power is transferred. Instead, Coppola does the opposite. He removes Vito from every symbol that has defined him throughout the film. The dark office is gone. The desk where life-and-death decisions were made is gone. The men waiting for his orders are gone. Even Don Corleone's black suit is gone. What remains is an elderly man in a simple cardigan, sitting among trees, speaking with his son in the soft light of late afternoon. At first glance, it seems like nothing more than a change of location. In cinematic terms, however, it is the most important choice in the entire sequence. For nearly three hours, Coppola carefully builds Vito through the language of power. In this scene, he deliberately strips those layers away. Not to make the character appear weaker. But to stop us from seeing Don Corleone—and allow us to see Vito. Just as importantly, Michael is never framed as a subordinate receiving instructions. The two men sit at eye level. The camera refuses to establish dominance. There is no composition of command and obedience. Because this is not staged as a transfer of authority. It is staged as a meeting. One man has almost reached the end of his journey. The other is about to begin its most difficult chapter. What Vito offers is not a collection of strategies for victory. Strategy belongs to its own time and circumstance. What he passes on is something deeper—a sense of direction that can endure even when circumstances inevitably change. That is why the rhythm of the scene becomes remarkably quiet. There is no conflict. No dramatic climax. No speech designed to astonish the audience. Coppola lets everything settle. Because some truths can only be heard after the noise has faded. That is also why he chooses the garden. Throughout The Godfather, it is the place closest to nature. A garden is where human beings care for life, but never create it. A gardener cannot force a seed to grow. He can only cultivate the conditions in which the life already within the seed may flourish. In a deeper sense, Vito is doing the same. He cannot live Michael's life for him. He cannot make the choices Michael will one day face. The only thing he can do is preserve what time has already proven to be enduring, and entrust it to the next generation. This is no longer instruction. It is continuity. Perhaps that is why Coppola refuses to place the conversation inside a room. He places it among trees. Because nature has always followed a simple law. A tree does not keep its fruit for itself. The fruit bears seeds. The seeds become new trees. Life does not continue through possession. Life continues through what is given away. And it is here that Coppola completes Vito Corleone's journey. For most of the film, Vito is a Don. He commands. He judges. He protects his family. He carries an entire order upon his shoulders. But in the garden, every one of those roles quietly falls away. What remains is not a crime boss. It is a man. A man no longer concerned with how much power he can hold. Only with what is worthy of living on after he is gone. Perhaps that is why this sequence leaves such a lasting impression. It does not ask us to admire Vito Corleone. It invites us to examine ourselves. One day our work will end. Our status will end. Our reputation will end. Even the roles life has entrusted to us will come to an end. When that day arrives, what will remain? Francis Ford Coppola never answers that question with dialogue. He answers it with images. He quietly removes a man from every symbol of power, returns him to the natural world, and lets life speak for itself. Perhaps that is why, more than half a century later, the garden scene still leaves audiences in silence. Not because it is about a Mafia family. But because it reminds us of something every human heart instinctively recognizes. A life is not ultimately measured by what we keep for ourselves, but by what is most true within us that continues to live on in the lives of others. Name movie: The Godfather (1972)
2:19

Many remember Vito Corleone's final conversation with Michael as the moment a father passes his empire to his son. But if that had truly been Francis Ford Coppola's central point, the scene would never have taken place in a garden. He would have set it in the office. That is where power is built. It is also where power is transferred. Instead, Coppola does the opposite. He removes Vito from every symbol that has defined him throughout the film. The dark office is gone. The desk where life-and-death decisions were made is gone. The men waiting for his orders are gone. Even Don Corleone's black suit is gone. What remains is an elderly man in a simple cardigan, sitting among trees, speaking with his son in the soft light of late afternoon. At first glance, it seems like nothing more than a change of location. In cinematic terms, however, it is the most important choice in the entire sequence. For nearly three hours, Coppola carefully builds Vito through the language of power. In this scene, he deliberately strips those layers away. Not to make the character appear weaker. But to stop us from seeing Don Corleone—and allow us to see Vito. Just as importantly, Michael is never framed as a subordinate receiving instructions. The two men sit at eye level. The camera refuses to establish dominance. There is no composition of command and obedience. Because this is not staged as a transfer of authority. It is staged as a meeting. One man has almost reached the end of his journey. The other is about to begin its most difficult chapter. What Vito offers is not a collection of strategies for victory. Strategy belongs to its own time and circumstance. What he passes on is something deeper—a sense of direction that can endure even when circumstances inevitably change. That is why the rhythm of the scene becomes remarkably quiet. There is no conflict. No dramatic climax. No speech designed to astonish the audience. Coppola lets everything settle. Because some truths can only be heard after the noise has faded. That is also why he chooses the garden. Throughout The Godfather, it is the place closest to nature. A garden is where human beings care for life, but never create it. A gardener cannot force a seed to grow. He can only cultivate the conditions in which the life already within the seed may flourish. In a deeper sense, Vito is doing the same. He cannot live Michael's life for him. He cannot make the choices Michael will one day face. The only thing he can do is preserve what time has already proven to be enduring, and entrust it to the next generation. This is no longer instruction. It is continuity. Perhaps that is why Coppola refuses to place the conversation inside a room. He places it among trees. Because nature has always followed a simple law. A tree does not keep its fruit for itself. The fruit bears seeds. The seeds become new trees. Life does not continue through possession. Life continues through what is given away. And it is here that Coppola completes Vito Corleone's journey. For most of the film, Vito is a Don. He commands. He judges. He protects his family. He carries an entire order upon his shoulders. But in the garden, every one of those roles quietly falls away. What remains is not a crime boss. It is a man. A man no longer concerned with how much power he can hold. Only with what is worthy of living on after he is gone. Perhaps that is why this sequence leaves such a lasting impression. It does not ask us to admire Vito Corleone. It invites us to examine ourselves. One day our work will end. Our status will end. Our reputation will end. Even the roles life has entrusted to us will come to an end. When that day arrives, what will remain? Francis Ford Coppola never answers that question with dialogue. He answers it with images. He quietly removes a man from every symbol of power, returns him to the natural world, and lets life speak for itself. Perhaps that is why, more than half a century later, the garden scene still leaves audiences in silence. Not because it is about a Mafia family. But because it reminds us of something every human heart instinctively recognizes. A life is not ultimately measured by what we keep for ourselves, but by what is most true within us that continues to live on in the lives of others. Name movie: The Godfather (1972)

Love Classical Music and Movies 🎺🎻💖🎥🎬

32,794 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

At a Q&A, John MacArthur is asked about Christian nationalism. The kingdom of God is not of this world. Jesus said that. He said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would [fight].” His kingdom is not of this world. The kingdom of this world is a separate world; they’re not linked together. Let me say it another way: Nothing that happens in any nation, whether it’s a Communist nation, a Muslim nation, or a “quasi-Christian” nation, or an atheistic nation—nothing in that nation politically, socially has anything to do with the advancement of the kingdom of God, because the kingdom of God is separate from that system. God, in His sovereignty, is building His church, “and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it,” Jesus said. So the idea that you should link up some political effort, some political process, some social process, some gain of power or influence in a culture as part of the advance of Christianity is alien to Christianity. You never have our Lord approaching anything like that, nor the apostles, and particularly the apostle Paul. He sought to gain no favor with the Roman Empire whatsoever, or for that matter, with any other of the rulers that he ran into during his life. Now, that is not to say that we are indifferent to what happens in the nation. We’ve been talking about that the last couple of Sunday mornings. We have to be the people who uphold righteousness. When we come to vote, we want to vote for that which is the most righteous option. Obviously, we can’t vote in righteousness, but we have to vote in a way that reflects our commitment to the righteousness of God. So we couldn’t possibly elect somebody who was an abortionist, somebody who was LGBTQ or LGBTQ-affirming, or any other deviation from God’s righteous moral standard. So it gets harder, doesn’t it, nowadays, because even sometimes when politicians are more conservative and anti-abortion, they may be sinful and wicked in some other categories, and it’s very hard to find out who is really honest and who is simply dishonest and seeking power. But in the end, we do what we can with the understanding that the responsibility of the church is not to advance the kingdom of this world. That’s a faulty viewpoint. Christian nationalism is usually tied to what is called post-millennialism, and that is the view that the church, somehow, by influencing the culture, can bring in the kingdom of Christ. In other words, it’s the idea not that Christ returns and sets up His kingdom, but that the church establishes His kingdom and then hands it to Him. That is not what Scripture teaches. What Scripture teaches is what we’re learning from the book of Revelation. Things are going to get worse and worse and worse. And the end of human history is not the church triumphant, reigning in the world and taking over the structures of human kingdoms; that’s not what happens. At the end of human history, the believers are persecuted and murdered, and that’s the very opposite of what Christian nationalism would anticipate. So we believe the Bible teaches that things get worse and worse, headed toward the wrath of God, which we’re seeing in Revelation, and then our Lord returns, Himself, to establish His kingdom is clearly what we read in the book of Revelation. OK?
5:08

At a Q&A, John MacArthur is asked about Christian nationalism. The kingdom of God is not of this world. Jesus said that. He said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would [fight].” His kingdom is not of this world. The kingdom of this world is a separate world; they’re not linked together. Let me say it another way: Nothing that happens in any nation, whether it’s a Communist nation, a Muslim nation, or a “quasi-Christian” nation, or an atheistic nation—nothing in that nation politically, socially has anything to do with the advancement of the kingdom of God, because the kingdom of God is separate from that system. God, in His sovereignty, is building His church, “and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it,” Jesus said. So the idea that you should link up some political effort, some political process, some social process, some gain of power or influence in a culture as part of the advance of Christianity is alien to Christianity. You never have our Lord approaching anything like that, nor the apostles, and particularly the apostle Paul. He sought to gain no favor with the Roman Empire whatsoever, or for that matter, with any other of the rulers that he ran into during his life. Now, that is not to say that we are indifferent to what happens in the nation. We’ve been talking about that the last couple of Sunday mornings. We have to be the people who uphold righteousness. When we come to vote, we want to vote for that which is the most righteous option. Obviously, we can’t vote in righteousness, but we have to vote in a way that reflects our commitment to the righteousness of God. So we couldn’t possibly elect somebody who was an abortionist, somebody who was LGBTQ or LGBTQ-affirming, or any other deviation from God’s righteous moral standard. So it gets harder, doesn’t it, nowadays, because even sometimes when politicians are more conservative and anti-abortion, they may be sinful and wicked in some other categories, and it’s very hard to find out who is really honest and who is simply dishonest and seeking power. But in the end, we do what we can with the understanding that the responsibility of the church is not to advance the kingdom of this world. That’s a faulty viewpoint. Christian nationalism is usually tied to what is called post-millennialism, and that is the view that the church, somehow, by influencing the culture, can bring in the kingdom of Christ. In other words, it’s the idea not that Christ returns and sets up His kingdom, but that the church establishes His kingdom and then hands it to Him. That is not what Scripture teaches. What Scripture teaches is what we’re learning from the book of Revelation. Things are going to get worse and worse and worse. And the end of human history is not the church triumphant, reigning in the world and taking over the structures of human kingdoms; that’s not what happens. At the end of human history, the believers are persecuted and murdered, and that’s the very opposite of what Christian nationalism would anticipate. So we believe the Bible teaches that things get worse and worse, headed toward the wrath of God, which we’re seeing in Revelation, and then our Lord returns, Himself, to establish His kingdom is clearly what we read in the book of Revelation. OK?

Terri Green

12,965 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

Cain: It is really hard not to see this through the lens of the art of the deal. Trump makes a demand and that is the purchase of Greenland. He is immediately rebuffed. He amps up the demand…we wind up back in a place where perhaps it’s not full ownership but it is a deal…. Nobody understands the lesson of what is happening. It’s the art of the deal.
1:58

Cain: It is really hard not to see this through the lens of the art of the deal. Trump makes a demand and that is the purchase of Greenland. He is immediately rebuffed. He amps up the demand…we wind up back in a place where perhaps it’s not full ownership but it is a deal…. Nobody understands the lesson of what is happening. It’s the art of the deal.

Acyn

133,292 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

‼️ President Zelensky is not just a great leader. He is a visionary. The following is from his sitcom “Servant of the People” but it describes perfectly what took place in the Oval Office with Trump and Vance. “I want to thank you for the time you’ve spent on us as well as for a very meaningful discussion. And with a feeling of deep gratitude, I want to say: “Go screw yourself!” This is mandatory to fulfill. We are not beggars and not gastarbeiters. I want everyone to remember once and for all - we are not the outskirts, nor the border region between the Orcs and the Elves! We are a normal, strong, beautiful, and rich country. And the fact that right now we are on the ground is not a reason to bend us over.”
0:58

‼️ President Zelensky is not just a great leader. He is a visionary. The following is from his sitcom “Servant of the People” but it describes perfectly what took place in the Oval Office with Trump and Vance. “I want to thank you for the time you’ve spent on us as well as for a very meaningful discussion. And with a feeling of deep gratitude, I want to say: “Go screw yourself!” This is mandatory to fulfill. We are not beggars and not gastarbeiters. I want everyone to remember once and for all - we are not the outskirts, nor the border region between the Orcs and the Elves! We are a normal, strong, beautiful, and rich country. And the fact that right now we are on the ground is not a reason to bend us over.”

Natalka

34,725 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

According to Jay anyone is allowed to say the n word as long as theyre not "mean" and the only reason he doesnt say it is because he doesnt want to lose his sponsorships. If he wasnt a streamer, hed say it. Not because saying 'nigga' is inherently wrong and racist. What a world we live in folks.
0:59

According to Jay anyone is allowed to say the n word as long as theyre not "mean" and the only reason he doesnt say it is because he doesnt want to lose his sponsorships. If he wasnt a streamer, hed say it. Not because saying 'nigga' is inherently wrong and racist. What a world we live in folks.

Tiffy TD

14,712 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

We are back in the terrain of whose mandate, between the National Commissioner and the Minister of police is to do what? Bahlali, the Minister is in trouble. Mchunu is asked who would have determined and decided that work of a Task Team is done and it can now be disbanded. He answers that it would have been the Minister, “possibly” using his powers in Section 207 (2). Except he misdirects himself. The powers in that section, as he describes, are those of National Commissioner. NOT the Minister!
2:14

We are back in the terrain of whose mandate, between the National Commissioner and the Minister of police is to do what? Bahlali, the Minister is in trouble. Mchunu is asked who would have determined and decided that work of a Task Team is done and it can now be disbanded. He answers that it would have been the Minister, “possibly” using his powers in Section 207 (2). Except he misdirects himself. The powers in that section, as he describes, are those of National Commissioner. NOT the Minister!

Sabelo Chalufu | @BetterGovZA 🇿🇦

80,223 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Jensen Huang explains how he designed NVIDIA from first principles “With respect to building a company, the first thing you have to do—as with all problems—is start from first principles. What is this machine that we’re trying to create? What is its input? What is its output? What are the conditions that it’s in? What is the industry like? Is it a fast moving industry? Is it a bureaucratic industry? Is it a highly regulated industry? And what are you trying to build?” Thinking about it from this perspective, there were several things Jensen wanted to do with the company: “I wanted to create a company that naturally attracts amazing people, and the reason for that is our company’s mission is to solve computing problems that are barely possible.” He also wanted a company that was “as small as possible” and “empowered people.” “If you want an organization that obeys command and control, then you make it a pyramid just like the military—all the way back to the Roman Empire. But If you want to empower people, you want to make it as flat as possible so that information travels quickly.” He continues: “We also don’t have business units. We don’t have divisions. Everybody works as one, and the company is shaped in a way that allows us to build accelerated computing best.” Video source: Sana (2023)
1:56

Jensen Huang explains how he designed NVIDIA from first principles “With respect to building a company, the first thing you have to do—as with all problems—is start from first principles. What is this machine that we’re trying to create? What is its input? What is its output? What are the conditions that it’s in? What is the industry like? Is it a fast moving industry? Is it a bureaucratic industry? Is it a highly regulated industry? And what are you trying to build?” Thinking about it from this perspective, there were several things Jensen wanted to do with the company: “I wanted to create a company that naturally attracts amazing people, and the reason for that is our company’s mission is to solve computing problems that are barely possible.” He also wanted a company that was “as small as possible” and “empowered people.” “If you want an organization that obeys command and control, then you make it a pyramid just like the military—all the way back to the Roman Empire. But If you want to empower people, you want to make it as flat as possible so that information travels quickly.” He continues: “We also don’t have business units. We don’t have divisions. Everybody works as one, and the company is shaped in a way that allows us to build accelerated computing best.” Video source: Sana (2023)

Startup Archive

63,921 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce