Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Roger Stone isn’t holding back. 👀 He points out the stark contrast between Trump’s 2nd term and the 1st: 👉 No leaks from the WH, DoD, FBI, or State Dept. 👉 Negotiations kept tight — no media circus. Then he drops the hammer: At his 2019 arrest, CNN showed...

ProjectConstitu's profile picture

Project Constitution

170,892 subscribers

42,606 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

A CNN camera crew arrived at my front door 15 minutes BEFORE the FBI raided my home. That was not “investigative journalism.” I was arrested at 6:06 a.m. At 6:11 a.m., Sara Murray of CNN texted my lawyer a copy of my SEALED criminal indictment. The document carried no timestamp and no court markings. But its metadata identified the author—revealing the source of the illegal leak: Andrew Weissmann, the de facto head of the Mueller witch hunt.
1:06

A CNN camera crew arrived at my front door 15 minutes BEFORE the FBI raided my home. That was not “investigative journalism.” I was arrested at 6:06 a.m. At 6:11 a.m., Sara Murray of CNN texted my lawyer a copy of my SEALED criminal indictment. The document carried no timestamp and no court markings. But its metadata identified the author—revealing the source of the illegal leak: Andrew Weissmann, the de facto head of the Mueller witch hunt.

Roger Stone

882,725 views • 7 months ago

Julius Erving talking about playing with Charles Barkley: “I kept seeing his upside. He was hard-headed. He had something to say about everything. If he didn’t play as good as he can and well as he was capable of playing or whatever, then some of the things he did wouldn’t be tolerated. But they were tolerated because, you know, he was exceptional, man. He could rebound it, take it coast to coast, make play. And for his height to rebound the way that he did, it was incredible. It was kind of disruptive because we had won the championship the year before he got there. Then the year that he got there. We had to make room for him and he almost killed Marc Iavaroni cuz he was playing the four, Charles was like that’s my spot right there. This going back to violence in the game because the next man up. Me and you man. He get Iavaroni at his back. He back him all the way out to the top of the key” (Via All the Smoke)
1:24

Julius Erving talking about playing with Charles Barkley: “I kept seeing his upside. He was hard-headed. He had something to say about everything. If he didn’t play as good as he can and well as he was capable of playing or whatever, then some of the things he did wouldn’t be tolerated. But they were tolerated because, you know, he was exceptional, man. He could rebound it, take it coast to coast, make play. And for his height to rebound the way that he did, it was incredible. It was kind of disruptive because we had won the championship the year before he got there. Then the year that he got there. We had to make room for him and he almost killed Marc Iavaroni cuz he was playing the four, Charles was like that’s my spot right there. This going back to violence in the game because the next man up. Me and you man. He get Iavaroni at his back. He back him all the way out to the top of the key” (Via All the Smoke)

NBA Courtside

38,407 views • 5 months ago

Roger Stone was one of the most recognizable political strategists in America. Then, before dawn on January 25th, 2019, the FBI surrounded his Florida home with armored vehicles, helicopters, and frogmen, while CNN cameras rolled. He says prosecutors told him he could die in prison unless he agreed to testify against Donald Trump. Instead, Stone refused, endured what he calls a “show trial,” and lost nearly everything. Now, he reveals how the justice system was weaponized against him. Surprise FBI Raid (1:24) Why Was Roger Stone Arrested? (7:20) The Booking Process/Arrest (11:50) Jury Corruption (14:00) Andrew Weissman’s Role (19:47) Advice for People Who Are Raided (24:28) Disproving the Charges & Resisting Trump Betrayal (25:30) Losing Everything to Pay Attorneys (28:30) Accusations Vs. Tangible Proof (30:20) Prosecuting the Prosecutors (32:00) Finding Faith (35:00) Commuted by Trump/Given Pardon (39:00) Obama Presidency Changed Everything (44:31) Virginia Gieuffre’s Testimony on Jeffrey Epstein (45:15) The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein (46:40) Who Really Killed JFK? (52:59) Richard Nixon on Israel (1:08:10) Stone and Trump Friendship (1:14:32) “The Apprentice” and Seeing Trump’s Potential (1:15:54) Nixon’s Run for President (1:18:50) On Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart (1:26:30) Roger Stone Listen & Subscribe to My Price Is My Life – Website: Spotify: Apple Podcasts: YouTube:
1:34:06

Roger Stone was one of the most recognizable political strategists in America. Then, before dawn on January 25th, 2019, the FBI surrounded his Florida home with armored vehicles, helicopters, and frogmen, while CNN cameras rolled. He says prosecutors told him he could die in prison unless he agreed to testify against Donald Trump. Instead, Stone refused, endured what he calls a “show trial,” and lost nearly everything. Now, he reveals how the justice system was weaponized against him. Surprise FBI Raid (1:24) Why Was Roger Stone Arrested? (7:20) The Booking Process/Arrest (11:50) Jury Corruption (14:00) Andrew Weissman’s Role (19:47) Advice for People Who Are Raided (24:28) Disproving the Charges & Resisting Trump Betrayal (25:30) Losing Everything to Pay Attorneys (28:30) Accusations Vs. Tangible Proof (30:20) Prosecuting the Prosecutors (32:00) Finding Faith (35:00) Commuted by Trump/Given Pardon (39:00) Obama Presidency Changed Everything (44:31) Virginia Gieuffre’s Testimony on Jeffrey Epstein (45:15) The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein (46:40) Who Really Killed JFK? (52:59) Richard Nixon on Israel (1:08:10) Stone and Trump Friendship (1:14:32) “The Apprentice” and Seeing Trump’s Potential (1:15:54) Nixon’s Run for President (1:18:50) On Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart (1:26:30) Roger Stone Listen & Subscribe to My Price Is My Life – Website: Spotify: Apple Podcasts: YouTube:

James O'Keefe

663,939 views • 11 months ago

Drunk man breaks into dog shelter after losing his own dog to cancer. Staff thought it was a robbery when cameras caught him walking through the kennel aisle after midnight. The dogs were wide awake, watching him from behind the gates, and no one knew what he was doing there. Then another camera showed him curled up on the floor, surrounded by dogs. Police say he had been drinking that night after his dog died the week before. Nothing was stolen. No animals were hurt. He was arrested for breaking in, but shelter workers said the footage was hard to watch. He didn't come for money. He came because he missed his dog.
0:44

Drunk man breaks into dog shelter after losing his own dog to cancer. Staff thought it was a robbery when cameras caught him walking through the kennel aisle after midnight. The dogs were wide awake, watching him from behind the gates, and no one knew what he was doing there. Then another camera showed him curled up on the floor, surrounded by dogs. Police say he had been drinking that night after his dog died the week before. Nothing was stolen. No animals were hurt. He was arrested for breaking in, but shelter workers said the footage was hard to watch. He didn't come for money. He came because he missed his dog.

Gabriele Corno

81,760 views • 1 month ago

what matthew actually did instead of going to sleep last night like he said he would (all men do is lie 🙄) so xiaojun and matthew both said they had to take a flight today, and when they have to get their hair and makeup done before a flight they have to leave early but it was a morning flight so they had to get it done really early at like 3am, and after practicing and washing up it was 12:30-45am so the timing felt a bit awkward like should he sleep for 2 hours? so he just gamed with xiaojun for 2 hours, and then he proceeded to talk about how he kept knocking out between getting his hair and makeup done, riding the car to the airport, arriving at the airport, and the way he couldn't open his eyes and how it was so bright when he got out of the car 😭😭😭
2:23

what matthew actually did instead of going to sleep last night like he said he would (all men do is lie 🙄) so xiaojun and matthew both said they had to take a flight today, and when they have to get their hair and makeup done before a flight they have to leave early but it was a morning flight so they had to get it done really early at like 3am, and after practicing and washing up it was 12:30-45am so the timing felt a bit awkward like should he sleep for 2 hours? so he just gamed with xiaojun for 2 hours, and then he proceeded to talk about how he kept knocking out between getting his hair and makeup done, riding the car to the airport, arriving at the airport, and the way he couldn't open his eyes and how it was so bright when he got out of the car 😭😭😭

~원~

50,457 views • 8 months ago

Caleb hammer almost fainted after this guest said her husband was allegedly caught j3rking off to her 7-year-old sister. Caleb Hammer: “Do you not know what a girls’ trip is? How does that equal you being a P3dophile?” Caleb Hammer: “It sounds like she said it, like, once.” Male Guest: “No, she said it three times.” Caleb Hammer: “How do you get from that to, “Unless you’re a P3dophile?” Female Guest: “I see, because we had issues in the past.” Caleb Hammer: “What? What? No, no. Context, please. What issues would lead to that insinuation?” Female Guest: “My little sister spent the night one time, and he stayed in the living room. She walked out to grab a drink, and he was on the couch doing very inappropriate things. He proceeded to lie to me and my mom about it when she wanted to go home. So then he tied me saying it was weird into that past experience.” Caleb Hammer: “How old was she at the time?” Guest: “She was like seven, he didn’t know she was going to walk out. It wasn’t meant to be like that, but he then tied it back to that.” Caleb Hammer: “Guys, what the f***? No, no, no, no. A 7-year-old is in the house. Why are you in the living room doing… no. You don’t do that.” “if a kid is in the house, we don’t set up sexual exposure unless there is, like, an intent to be caught in some way.” Male Guest: “I was sleeping in the living room. They were sleeping in the living room.” Caleb Hammer: “You still go to the bathroom.” Female Guest: “That’s fair. I know, and that’s why I said it was just one night. She was only spending the night that one time.” Caleb Hammer: “What was he caught doing, specifically?” Female Guest: “j3rking off.” Caleb Hammer: “Just full out in the open?” Female Guest: “Yes” Male Guest: “No, I was under a blanket.” Caleb Hammer: “It doesn’t sound like it from what’s being said.” Female Guest: “She said that she saw everything.”
2:59

Sensitive content

Caleb hammer almost fainted after this guest said her husband was allegedly caught j3rking off to her 7-year-old sister. Caleb Hammer: “Do you not know what a girls’ trip is? How does that equal you being a P3dophile?” Caleb Hammer: “It sounds like she said it, like, once.” Male Guest: “No, she said it three times.” Caleb Hammer: “How do you get from that to, “Unless you’re a P3dophile?” Female Guest: “I see, because we had issues in the past.” Caleb Hammer: “What? What? No, no. Context, please. What issues would lead to that insinuation?” Female Guest: “My little sister spent the night one time, and he stayed in the living room. She walked out to grab a drink, and he was on the couch doing very inappropriate things. He proceeded to lie to me and my mom about it when she wanted to go home. So then he tied me saying it was weird into that past experience.” Caleb Hammer: “How old was she at the time?” Guest: “She was like seven, he didn’t know she was going to walk out. It wasn’t meant to be like that, but he then tied it back to that.” Caleb Hammer: “Guys, what the f***? No, no, no, no. A 7-year-old is in the house. Why are you in the living room doing… no. You don’t do that.” “if a kid is in the house, we don’t set up sexual exposure unless there is, like, an intent to be caught in some way.” Male Guest: “I was sleeping in the living room. They were sleeping in the living room.” Caleb Hammer: “You still go to the bathroom.” Female Guest: “That’s fair. I know, and that’s why I said it was just one night. She was only spending the night that one time.” Caleb Hammer: “What was he caught doing, specifically?” Female Guest: “j3rking off.” Caleb Hammer: “Just full out in the open?” Female Guest: “Yes” Male Guest: “No, I was under a blanket.” Caleb Hammer: “It doesn’t sound like it from what’s being said.” Female Guest: “She said that she saw everything.”

𝓢𝓵𝓪𝓶 👁️⃤

66,205 views • 25 days ago

Do you know why God once allowed Samuel, who had already died, to actually be summoned up by a witch? This is not just an ordinary, eerie story, but a judgment in the Bible so chilling it sends a shiver down your spine. Because Samuel was never an ordinary man. He was one of the most weighty prophets in Israel. From childhood, he heard the voice of God. He spent his whole life proclaiming God's Word and almost none of it ever fell to the ground. He anointed Saul and he also anointed David. In that generation, he was almost the very mouthpiece of God's will. But the most unsettling part is not who Samuel was while he was alive. It is that after his death, he appeared again in the night at Endor. By then, Saul was already nearing his end. The Philistine army was closing in and fear swallowed him like a rising tide. He sought an answer from God, but God no longer responded. No dreams, no prophet, no direction at all.
2:31

Do you know why God once allowed Samuel, who had already died, to actually be summoned up by a witch? This is not just an ordinary, eerie story, but a judgment in the Bible so chilling it sends a shiver down your spine. Because Samuel was never an ordinary man. He was one of the most weighty prophets in Israel. From childhood, he heard the voice of God. He spent his whole life proclaiming God's Word and almost none of it ever fell to the ground. He anointed Saul and he also anointed David. In that generation, he was almost the very mouthpiece of God's will. But the most unsettling part is not who Samuel was while he was alive. It is that after his death, he appeared again in the night at Endor. By then, Saul was already nearing his end. The Philistine army was closing in and fear swallowed him like a rising tide. He sought an answer from God, but God no longer responded. No dreams, no prophet, no direction at all.

NancyH

118,418 views • 4 months ago

PREDATOR EXPOSED IN A FINANCIAL AUDIT 💀!!! Caleb Hammer says that it is completely inappropriate to perform sexual acts in the living room while a child is in the house, regardless of whether it was intended to be seen. Caleb Hammer: How do you get off on that unless you're a... No, because the way she... Woman: Because we had issues in the past with... issues. That we had already resolved, but then he kept... Caleb Hammer: In what? In what? No, no, no. Context, please. What issues would lead to that insinuation? Woman: My little sister spent the night one time, um, and he stayed in the living room and she walked out to go grab a drink and he was on the couch doing very inappropriate things. Proceeded to lie to me and my mom about it when she wanted to go home, and so then he tied me saying it was weird into the past experience. Caleb hammer : How old is she? Woman: At the time, she was like seven. Caleb: [Groans and ducks under the desk] Guys, what the f... No, no, no, no, no. Seven-year-old in the house? Why are you in the living room getting off? No, no, no, you don't do... No. First of all, I just got to note that literally nobody knew this, by the way. But, um... if a kid is in the house, we don't set up sexual exposures unless there's like a... intent to be caught in some way. Man: No, she... that must be... Caleb: No, no, no, no, no. Nobody sets out in the living room. Man: No, I was sleeping in the living room. They were sleeping in the bedroom. Caleb: Oh, you still go to the bathroom. As a masturbated myself, I know... Woman: And that's why I said it was one night, like, she was spending the night one night. Even if... Caleb: And what was he caught doing, specifically? Woman: Jacking off.
2:53

Sensitive content

PREDATOR EXPOSED IN A FINANCIAL AUDIT 💀!!! Caleb Hammer says that it is completely inappropriate to perform sexual acts in the living room while a child is in the house, regardless of whether it was intended to be seen. Caleb Hammer: How do you get off on that unless you're a... No, because the way she... Woman: Because we had issues in the past with... issues. That we had already resolved, but then he kept... Caleb Hammer: In what? In what? No, no, no. Context, please. What issues would lead to that insinuation? Woman: My little sister spent the night one time, um, and he stayed in the living room and she walked out to go grab a drink and he was on the couch doing very inappropriate things. Proceeded to lie to me and my mom about it when she wanted to go home, and so then he tied me saying it was weird into the past experience. Caleb hammer : How old is she? Woman: At the time, she was like seven. Caleb: [Groans and ducks under the desk] Guys, what the f... No, no, no, no, no. Seven-year-old in the house? Why are you in the living room getting off? No, no, no, you don't do... No. First of all, I just got to note that literally nobody knew this, by the way. But, um... if a kid is in the house, we don't set up sexual exposures unless there's like a... intent to be caught in some way. Man: No, she... that must be... Caleb: No, no, no, no, no. Nobody sets out in the living room. Man: No, I was sleeping in the living room. They were sleeping in the bedroom. Caleb: Oh, you still go to the bathroom. As a masturbated myself, I know... Woman: And that's why I said it was one night, like, she was spending the night one night. Even if... Caleb: And what was he caught doing, specifically? Woman: Jacking off.

Nuga

315,360 views • 27 days ago

🔥🔥" WHAT COMES AROUND GOES AROUND?" - Roger Stone. Jack has on ROGER STONE to discuss the John Bolton Raid. Roger highlights that Bolton was a cheerleader for the war in Iraq which we were lied into with falsities about WMD's, a role in 9/11 & was probably retaining classified documents at his home or office. Stone says, " It is nice to see that we are finally getting JUSTICE AND I THINK THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING." Jack Poso 🇺🇸 says, " I thought the raid was provoked by the people who wanted to get their original Village People Moustache back." LOL. Stone says, " If Kash Patel authorized a raid on Bolton then he had some probably cause & WHAT NOT POLITICAL THEATER LIKE IN MY CASE." And he is 100% correct. Jack asks Roger Stone if this is related to the Russian Collusion Hoax and if there is a bigger play with the Grand Juries being empanelled currently. Roger wants everyone to know that this was a CONTINUOUS SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY that began in 2016 all the way up through til 2024. Roger notes BIden could be charged, Comey, Brennan , Weissman, McCabe, Susan Rice may all be targeted and arrested. Unlike what happened to Roger they would likely have the opportunity to turn themselves in prior. Never forget Roger was swarmed by a Swat Team with M-4's & even amphibious units pulling up to his dock, helicopter & armed vehicles all because they believed he was a FLIGHT RISK although they knew he didnt have a Passport. Stone reminds everyone this was all in an attempt to get him to turn on The President..which he did not do.
10:02

🔥🔥" WHAT COMES AROUND GOES AROUND?" - Roger Stone. Jack has on ROGER STONE to discuss the John Bolton Raid. Roger highlights that Bolton was a cheerleader for the war in Iraq which we were lied into with falsities about WMD's, a role in 9/11 & was probably retaining classified documents at his home or office. Stone says, " It is nice to see that we are finally getting JUSTICE AND I THINK THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING." Jack Poso 🇺🇸 says, " I thought the raid was provoked by the people who wanted to get their original Village People Moustache back." LOL. Stone says, " If Kash Patel authorized a raid on Bolton then he had some probably cause & WHAT NOT POLITICAL THEATER LIKE IN MY CASE." And he is 100% correct. Jack asks Roger Stone if this is related to the Russian Collusion Hoax and if there is a bigger play with the Grand Juries being empanelled currently. Roger wants everyone to know that this was a CONTINUOUS SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY that began in 2016 all the way up through til 2024. Roger notes BIden could be charged, Comey, Brennan , Weissman, McCabe, Susan Rice may all be targeted and arrested. Unlike what happened to Roger they would likely have the opportunity to turn themselves in prior. Never forget Roger was swarmed by a Swat Team with M-4's & even amphibious units pulling up to his dock, helicopter & armed vehicles all because they believed he was a FLIGHT RISK although they knew he didnt have a Passport. Stone reminds everyone this was all in an attempt to get him to turn on The President..which he did not do.

Johnny St.Pete

39,961 views • 11 months ago

🚨BREAKING: Tucker Carlson says he will release evidence TOMORROW proving the FBI is lying about the assassination attempt on President Trump in Butler, PA. Joe Rogan and Elon Musk have already exposed the insane inconsistencies surrounding Thomas Crooks: • His house was “professionally scrubbed” — no clothes, no cutlery, nothing • Zero internet footprint — wiped clean • No social media — wiped clean • Appeared in a BlackRock commercial • Crews cremated his body immediately • 5 phones — for a 20-year-old • A phone reportedly traveled repeatedly from FBI HQ in DC to his home • No formal report, no detailed briefing, no press conference • CNN streamed the rally live — extremely unusual • Crooks was seen with a rangefinder nearly 30 minutes beforehand • Secret Service blocked agents from the roof he used — claiming it was “too dangerous,” despite snipers on a steeper roof nearby • Random civilians pointed him out long before the shooting • His house was so empty “it didn’t even have silverware” Rogan: “This is completely insane. None of it makes sense.” “It looks like a coordinated assassination attempt.” Musk: “The inconsistencies are extreme.” Tucker: “We have proof the FBI is lying — and we’re releasing it.” We need answers.
7:14

🚨BREAKING: Tucker Carlson says he will release evidence TOMORROW proving the FBI is lying about the assassination attempt on President Trump in Butler, PA. Joe Rogan and Elon Musk have already exposed the insane inconsistencies surrounding Thomas Crooks: • His house was “professionally scrubbed” — no clothes, no cutlery, nothing • Zero internet footprint — wiped clean • No social media — wiped clean • Appeared in a BlackRock commercial • Crews cremated his body immediately • 5 phones — for a 20-year-old • A phone reportedly traveled repeatedly from FBI HQ in DC to his home • No formal report, no detailed briefing, no press conference • CNN streamed the rally live — extremely unusual • Crooks was seen with a rangefinder nearly 30 minutes beforehand • Secret Service blocked agents from the roof he used — claiming it was “too dangerous,” despite snipers on a steeper roof nearby • Random civilians pointed him out long before the shooting • His house was so empty “it didn’t even have silverware” Rogan: “This is completely insane. None of it makes sense.” “It looks like a coordinated assassination attempt.” Musk: “The inconsistencies are extreme.” Tucker: “We have proof the FBI is lying — and we’re releasing it.” We need answers.

Jim Ferguson

172,034 views • 8 months ago

When Rogan and Elon Musk Revisited The Butler Assassination Attempt against Donald Trump — Who the hell was Thomas Crooks? Still… no clue • CNN streamed Trump’s rally live, that day, which they very rarely (if ever do), especially not in the middle of nowhere. Did they want a murder on live-television? • Thomas Crooks was featured in a BlackRock Commercial • his home was professionally scrubbed, with no utensils. • the head of the Secret Service say they didn’t have a sniper on the roof because it was “too sloped”, while the snipers who were there were standing on roofs that had a steeper slope • Crooks had no footprint on the Internet, despot having 5 cell phones • the Secret Service knew he was there a 30 minutes before the event, with a rangefinder • there were reports there was a phone that traveled multiple times from the FBI offices in D.C. to Thomas Crooks home. “The whole thing is completely insane, and you don’t hear a damn thing about it.”
7:06

When Rogan and Elon Musk Revisited The Butler Assassination Attempt against Donald Trump — Who the hell was Thomas Crooks? Still… no clue • CNN streamed Trump’s rally live, that day, which they very rarely (if ever do), especially not in the middle of nowhere. Did they want a murder on live-television? • Thomas Crooks was featured in a BlackRock Commercial • his home was professionally scrubbed, with no utensils. • the head of the Secret Service say they didn’t have a sniper on the roof because it was “too sloped”, while the snipers who were there were standing on roofs that had a steeper slope • Crooks had no footprint on the Internet, despot having 5 cell phones • the Secret Service knew he was there a 30 minutes before the event, with a rangefinder • there were reports there was a phone that traveled multiple times from the FBI offices in D.C. to Thomas Crooks home. “The whole thing is completely insane, and you don’t hear a damn thing about it.”

MJTruthUltra

14,677 views • 3 months ago

Burt Lancaster on how he got cast in "The Leopard" (1963) after he rejected it the first time: "I bought 11 copies of ‘The Leopard’ because I thought it was a great novel. I gave it to everyone. But when I was asked to play in it, I said, no, that part’s for a real Italian. But, lo, the wheels of fortune turned. They wanted a Russian, but he was too old. They wanted Laurence Olivier, but he was too busy. When I was suggested, Visconti said, ‘Oh, no! A cowboy!’ But I had just finished ‘Judgment at Nuremberg,’ which he saw, and he needed $3 million which 20th Century-Fox would give them if they used an American star, and so the inevitable occurred. And it turned out to be a wonderful marriage. My best work. But you see, nobody told me not to do it. I was the one who said I couldn’t do it.” (Burt Lancaster's interview with Roger Ebert, 1986)
1:29

Burt Lancaster on how he got cast in "The Leopard" (1963) after he rejected it the first time: "I bought 11 copies of ‘The Leopard’ because I thought it was a great novel. I gave it to everyone. But when I was asked to play in it, I said, no, that part’s for a real Italian. But, lo, the wheels of fortune turned. They wanted a Russian, but he was too old. They wanted Laurence Olivier, but he was too busy. When I was suggested, Visconti said, ‘Oh, no! A cowboy!’ But I had just finished ‘Judgment at Nuremberg,’ which he saw, and he needed $3 million which 20th Century-Fox would give them if they used an American star, and so the inevitable occurred. And it turned out to be a wonderful marriage. My best work. But you see, nobody told me not to do it. I was the one who said I couldn’t do it.” (Burt Lancaster's interview with Roger Ebert, 1986)

DepressedBergman

136,115 views • 4 months ago

This family ordered pizza to be delivered. The Dominos driver finds the house and then proceeds to back up into the driveway. He hits their truck while doing so. Amazingly, he gets out and doesn’t even look for the damage. He grabs the pizza hot carrying case and proceeds to go give them their pizza. 🤯 Just before he pulled in, their son was outside with his girlfriend and they saw it. I’m guessing the driver was hoping he had not seen it. But the son had gone inside and told his parents. They said the driver didn’t mention anything and proceeded to deliver their pizza. But, they mentioned it and told them they saw it. They walked out to the truck but apparently he hit the tire and luckily there was no damage. They let it go at that. That’s what they said! 🤷‍♂️ Everyone makes mistakes, but, you should be teaching your kids to own up to their mistakes and as an adult, you don’t pretend you didn’t make one. 💯 Would you let it go at that? Would you call his location and let them know what happened? Or, would you just let it go like they did? Whatever happened to honesty and integrity?
1:20

This family ordered pizza to be delivered. The Dominos driver finds the house and then proceeds to back up into the driveway. He hits their truck while doing so. Amazingly, he gets out and doesn’t even look for the damage. He grabs the pizza hot carrying case and proceeds to go give them their pizza. 🤯 Just before he pulled in, their son was outside with his girlfriend and they saw it. I’m guessing the driver was hoping he had not seen it. But the son had gone inside and told his parents. They said the driver didn’t mention anything and proceeded to deliver their pizza. But, they mentioned it and told them they saw it. They walked out to the truck but apparently he hit the tire and luckily there was no damage. They let it go at that. That’s what they said! 🤷‍♂️ Everyone makes mistakes, but, you should be teaching your kids to own up to their mistakes and as an adult, you don’t pretend you didn’t make one. 💯 Would you let it go at that? Would you call his location and let them know what happened? Or, would you just let it go like they did? Whatever happened to honesty and integrity?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

774,775 views • 2 months ago

After listening again to Paul Okeefe. When he did his interview. I have questions. They had no visits from the state police that day. They were not told at the hospital what had caused Johns injuries. Not one person from the Okeefes looked at Karen’s tailight or her car. On the driveway. She comes to the house for about 40 mins. Yet he states, as soon as she left they had figured it out. HOW ? No one in that house saw karen reverse at 24mph and hit John. No one had witnessed karen and John arguing. The bar videos do not show karen drunk. Yet he states quite clearly. “ In a drunken rage she reversed and hit John”. So Paul who whispered that in your ear. There had been no extraction done on Karen’s car that morning to confirm the car had gone into reverse. So riddle me that Paul. Let me guess . Was it the 7 mins phone call from Jen to Peggy. 1.34pm Is that when you knew karen had supposedly gone in reverse. You were dripped fed lies.
0:36

After listening again to Paul Okeefe. When he did his interview. I have questions. They had no visits from the state police that day. They were not told at the hospital what had caused Johns injuries. Not one person from the Okeefes looked at Karen’s tailight or her car. On the driveway. She comes to the house for about 40 mins. Yet he states, as soon as she left they had figured it out. HOW ? No one in that house saw karen reverse at 24mph and hit John. No one had witnessed karen and John arguing. The bar videos do not show karen drunk. Yet he states quite clearly. “ In a drunken rage she reversed and hit John”. So Paul who whispered that in your ear. There had been no extraction done on Karen’s car that morning to confirm the car had gone into reverse. So riddle me that Paul. Let me guess . Was it the 7 mins phone call from Jen to Peggy. 1.34pm Is that when you knew karen had supposedly gone in reverse. You were dripped fed lies.

Suzy

22,573 views • 24 days ago

Did Proctor just admit to a dirty investigation? Last night on 20/20, Proctor said the moment he knew John was hit by Karen's SUV was at the hospital when he saw that John only had on one shoe. He knows from experience that if the other shoe is on the street, that is likely the point of impact, meaning he was hit by a car on the street. The problem with that statement is that Michael Proctor went to the hospital to see John at 1pm. At that time, he had not yet visited the crime scene. He had no idea where the other shoe was, and for all he knew, the shoe was inside the house. He then had Karen's SUV towed from Dighton at 4:30pm. The other shoe wasn't found on the street until 6pm by the SERT team. So, he knew at 1pm that at 6 pm, they would find the other shoe on the street, amd he should have Karen's SUV towed an hour and a half earlier so they have the vehicle in custody??? OK, got it.
0:20

Did Proctor just admit to a dirty investigation? Last night on 20/20, Proctor said the moment he knew John was hit by Karen's SUV was at the hospital when he saw that John only had on one shoe. He knows from experience that if the other shoe is on the street, that is likely the point of impact, meaning he was hit by a car on the street. The problem with that statement is that Michael Proctor went to the hospital to see John at 1pm. At that time, he had not yet visited the crime scene. He had no idea where the other shoe was, and for all he knew, the shoe was inside the house. He then had Karen's SUV towed from Dighton at 4:30pm. The other shoe wasn't found on the street until 6pm by the SERT team. So, he knew at 1pm that at 6 pm, they would find the other shoe on the street, amd he should have Karen's SUV towed an hour and a half earlier so they have the vehicle in custody??? OK, got it.

TinyElvis

121,318 views • 1 year ago

Yes on the videos we have so far. The initial encounter was him filming them. There was no gun being brandished. They jumped out of vehicles to go to try to intimidate him. Unfortunately there's no video yet between then and when they had them on the ground. When they had him on the ground they were pistol whipping him, at first it looked like a baton, but it's actually a gun. They had him down with at least five officers. You got to wait for a second so he tried to stand up they shot him in the back he was motionless after they shot him in the back. Then there were four more shots or more after that unloaded into his body from a posture of standing above him. Not a defensive posture. He's supposedly has a gun. It looks like ICE took something out of a holster. So it's likely that he did have a HOLSTERED GUN in an open carry state that is not a reason to shoot someone to death. He was not brandishing it -- again it was his camera. That was the reason for the initial approach was to intimidate him about his camera. It is perfectly legal to film ice This is out not murder once again. Now there is some sort of speculation on social that a gun was dropped and a bullet went off. That would be the ICE AGENTS who took the gun out of his holster. I'll post some videos for people to see in the order that they happened.
0:35

Yes on the videos we have so far. The initial encounter was him filming them. There was no gun being brandished. They jumped out of vehicles to go to try to intimidate him. Unfortunately there's no video yet between then and when they had them on the ground. When they had him on the ground they were pistol whipping him, at first it looked like a baton, but it's actually a gun. They had him down with at least five officers. You got to wait for a second so he tried to stand up they shot him in the back he was motionless after they shot him in the back. Then there were four more shots or more after that unloaded into his body from a posture of standing above him. Not a defensive posture. He's supposedly has a gun. It looks like ICE took something out of a holster. So it's likely that he did have a HOLSTERED GUN in an open carry state that is not a reason to shoot someone to death. He was not brandishing it -- again it was his camera. That was the reason for the initial approach was to intimidate him about his camera. It is perfectly legal to film ice This is out not murder once again. Now there is some sort of speculation on social that a gun was dropped and a bullet went off. That would be the ICE AGENTS who took the gun out of his holster. I'll post some videos for people to see in the order that they happened.

Kristine (@schachin on Threads) 🇺🇦

23,566 views • 6 months ago

To the people in the back who aren’t aware, surviving roommate and State’s “star witness," Dylan Mortensen, did NOT identify Bryan Kohberger as the suspect in the Idaho 4 murders when she saw his photo after his arrest. In fact, almost the entire time leading up to Bryan’s arrest on 12/30/22, Dylan believed it was Jack Showalter ("Hoodie Guy") who committed the murders, a fellow student and neighbor of the victims. Since she knew exactly who Jack was and what he looked like, her belief that he was the killer also meant accepting that he could have been the masked man she allegedly saw the night of the murders. She never explicitly said Jack was the masked man, but if she believed with certainty he was the killer, then by implication she had already reconciled his appearance with the person she reported seeing in the house. In her 12/30 interview after Bryan was arrested, investigators asked who she thought murdered her friends, and she answered quite assuredly and without hesitation, "Oh, Jack Showalter." Dylan then explained that during her most recent conversation with the FBI, they had told her Showalter was not the suspect because "he had been cooperative and blah, blah, blah." Her reaction, in an almost disappointed tone, was, "Oh shit, well I guess it wasn't him..." Dylan also explained that after seeing the video of Jack walking with Maddie and Kaylee, she thought, "Shit, well maybe he's not the guy because he's walking with them." She went on to say that if it wasn’t Jack, then it had to have been a University of Idaho student who knew the victims, knew the layout of the house, and knew which roommates occupied which rooms in the three-story home. It should be noted that Bryan, who lived in another state and went to a different school (WSU, not U of I), had NO connection to the victims or any of their friends (not physically or digitally), no one in their entire social circle knew who he was, he had never been to the house, and the State admitted after he initially accepted the plea deal, there was NO stalking of any of the victims or anyone at that house. At the end, when investigators pressed her again about Bryan Kohberger, Dylan said that upon looking at his photo, she had NO idea who he was and could NOT say he was the masked man she allegedly saw. In fact, she said she felt like she WOULD have recognized him if he had been the masked man in the house, and she could NOT. And yet, also knowing what Showalter looked like, she had to have been perfectly fine accepting that he could have been the masked man she allegedly saw since she was so certain he was the killer for weeks after the massacre. But with Kohberger - “When I looked at his picture, nothing came back to me at all.” Clip of interview below: (Note: I do NOT believe Jack Showalter was involved in the murders. He was ruled out by local law enforcement and the FBI, and that is not the takeaway here.) #Idaho4
4:20

To the people in the back who aren’t aware, surviving roommate and State’s “star witness," Dylan Mortensen, did NOT identify Bryan Kohberger as the suspect in the Idaho 4 murders when she saw his photo after his arrest. In fact, almost the entire time leading up to Bryan’s arrest on 12/30/22, Dylan believed it was Jack Showalter ("Hoodie Guy") who committed the murders, a fellow student and neighbor of the victims. Since she knew exactly who Jack was and what he looked like, her belief that he was the killer also meant accepting that he could have been the masked man she allegedly saw the night of the murders. She never explicitly said Jack was the masked man, but if she believed with certainty he was the killer, then by implication she had already reconciled his appearance with the person she reported seeing in the house. In her 12/30 interview after Bryan was arrested, investigators asked who she thought murdered her friends, and she answered quite assuredly and without hesitation, "Oh, Jack Showalter." Dylan then explained that during her most recent conversation with the FBI, they had told her Showalter was not the suspect because "he had been cooperative and blah, blah, blah." Her reaction, in an almost disappointed tone, was, "Oh shit, well I guess it wasn't him..." Dylan also explained that after seeing the video of Jack walking with Maddie and Kaylee, she thought, "Shit, well maybe he's not the guy because he's walking with them." She went on to say that if it wasn’t Jack, then it had to have been a University of Idaho student who knew the victims, knew the layout of the house, and knew which roommates occupied which rooms in the three-story home. It should be noted that Bryan, who lived in another state and went to a different school (WSU, not U of I), had NO connection to the victims or any of their friends (not physically or digitally), no one in their entire social circle knew who he was, he had never been to the house, and the State admitted after he initially accepted the plea deal, there was NO stalking of any of the victims or anyone at that house. At the end, when investigators pressed her again about Bryan Kohberger, Dylan said that upon looking at his photo, she had NO idea who he was and could NOT say he was the masked man she allegedly saw. In fact, she said she felt like she WOULD have recognized him if he had been the masked man in the house, and she could NOT. And yet, also knowing what Showalter looked like, she had to have been perfectly fine accepting that he could have been the masked man she allegedly saw since she was so certain he was the killer for weeks after the massacre. But with Kohberger - “When I looked at his picture, nothing came back to me at all.” Clip of interview below: (Note: I do NOT believe Jack Showalter was involved in the murders. He was ruled out by local law enforcement and the FBI, and that is not the takeaway here.) #Idaho4

𝕂𝕒𝕥𝕖

827,615 views • 1 day ago

Well, well, well… What the f**k do we have here? John Brennan’s security company was busted messing with Obama’s passport files at the State Department months before he was installed president. • In 2008, the State Department reported unauthorized access to the passport files of then-candidate Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain. — The State Department brushed it off as mere “curiosity.” • One of the individuals identified in the passport-file breach, Lt. Quarles Harris, was reportedly cooperating with federal investigators—until he was shot dead inside his car just one month the story broke. It turns out Quarles Harris worked for a security company called The Analysis Corporation (TAC). Who was TAC’s CEO? John Brennan. At the time, Brennan was also serving as an adviser to the Obama campaign. Manufactured birth certificate? Obama was in and out of Pakistan during the exact same period that John Brennan was in Pakistan working for the CIA. Where was Barry from 1981 to 1982? Obama claimed he was at Columbia University, but, according to this account, there is not a shred of evidence that he was. No records. No school documentation. Nothing. After the State Department breach, Obama acknowledged that he had traveled to Pakistan in 1981. In addition, John Brennan wasn’t the only person with CIA ties in Pakistan at the same time. So was Zbigniew Brzezinski, the father of Mika Brzezinski. Barack Obama later appointed both men to serve on his presidential transition advisory team. Brennan then served as Obama’s Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism from January 2009 to March 2013 before ultimately becoming Director of the CIA Three years later, in 2016, they orchestrated the single greatest misinformation and disinformation campaign to overthrow the U.S. government. Chanel Rion OAN
5:35

Well, well, well… What the f**k do we have here? John Brennan’s security company was busted messing with Obama’s passport files at the State Department months before he was installed president. • In 2008, the State Department reported unauthorized access to the passport files of then-candidate Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain. — The State Department brushed it off as mere “curiosity.” • One of the individuals identified in the passport-file breach, Lt. Quarles Harris, was reportedly cooperating with federal investigators—until he was shot dead inside his car just one month the story broke. It turns out Quarles Harris worked for a security company called The Analysis Corporation (TAC). Who was TAC’s CEO? John Brennan. At the time, Brennan was also serving as an adviser to the Obama campaign. Manufactured birth certificate? Obama was in and out of Pakistan during the exact same period that John Brennan was in Pakistan working for the CIA. Where was Barry from 1981 to 1982? Obama claimed he was at Columbia University, but, according to this account, there is not a shred of evidence that he was. No records. No school documentation. Nothing. After the State Department breach, Obama acknowledged that he had traveled to Pakistan in 1981. In addition, John Brennan wasn’t the only person with CIA ties in Pakistan at the same time. So was Zbigniew Brzezinski, the father of Mika Brzezinski. Barack Obama later appointed both men to serve on his presidential transition advisory team. Brennan then served as Obama’s Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism from January 2009 to March 2013 before ultimately becoming Director of the CIA Three years later, in 2016, they orchestrated the single greatest misinformation and disinformation campaign to overthrow the U.S. government. Chanel Rion OAN

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

466,417 views • 8 days ago

What a tragic case! George lost his life & there was no justice for the victims. George Stinney Jr was falsely convicted at the age of 14. He was accused of killing two girls, Betty (age 11) and Mary (age 7). The bodies were found near the house where George lived with his parents. Before his execution, George spent 81 days in prison before he was ever able to see his parents. He spent this time in solitary confinement, in a jail 80 miles from the city. He was questioned without the presence of his parents or a lawyer. His trial lasted only 2 hours, and the sentence was handed down 10 minutes later. The boy's parents were not allowed in the court room, and was subsequently expelled from that city after the trial. During his trial & until the day of his execution, George always carried a Bible in his hands. On the day of his execution, they used the Bible he was carrying as a booster seat because he was too short for the adult sized electric chair. 70 years after his execution, a judge in South Carolina finally overruled George's conviction. It was determined that the beam used in the murder, which weighed more than 19.07 kilograms, would have been too large for George to lift. There was no way he could have used it to strike the victims. ‘The Green Mile’ by Stephen King was inspired by George's case.
2:11

What a tragic case! George lost his life & there was no justice for the victims. George Stinney Jr was falsely convicted at the age of 14. He was accused of killing two girls, Betty (age 11) and Mary (age 7). The bodies were found near the house where George lived with his parents. Before his execution, George spent 81 days in prison before he was ever able to see his parents. He spent this time in solitary confinement, in a jail 80 miles from the city. He was questioned without the presence of his parents or a lawyer. His trial lasted only 2 hours, and the sentence was handed down 10 minutes later. The boy's parents were not allowed in the court room, and was subsequently expelled from that city after the trial. During his trial & until the day of his execution, George always carried a Bible in his hands. On the day of his execution, they used the Bible he was carrying as a booster seat because he was too short for the adult sized electric chair. 70 years after his execution, a judge in South Carolina finally overruled George's conviction. It was determined that the beam used in the murder, which weighed more than 19.07 kilograms, would have been too large for George to lift. There was no way he could have used it to strike the victims. ‘The Green Mile’ by Stephen King was inspired by George's case.

bstrat515 👑💛

15,761 views • 2 years ago