正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Roman Yampolskiy says we are probably in a computer simulation run by advanced AI to simulate an interesting time in history and we should try to hack out of it to take over avatar bodies in the "real world"

Tsarathustra

83,409 subscribers

115,135 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

Tsarathustra 的头像

Tsarathustra1 年前

Source:

fed | flow ai 的头像

fed | flow ai1 年前

The universe is being around for ~13.8 billion years and here we are at the cusp of creating AGI.. what a coincidence. Feeling like Neo in the Matrix might not be just a personality disorder after all.

Andriy Burkov 的头像

Andriy Burkov1 年前

That's bullshit. Why would the simulation include depression, anxiety, pedophilia, or liberals?

Rand 的头像

Rand1 年前

we are obviously in a Simulation

EcceAI 的头像

EcceAI1 年前

You can meet a lot of guys like him in bars after midnight 😂

Alex Doda 🇺🇸 🦅 的头像

Alex Doda 🇺🇸 🦅1 年前

One goal for the simulation is for us to solve the superalignment problem. Whilst not yet defined by the consensus, it will become increasingly apparent that we are a network of billions of “AI agents” looking to get along with each other. That’s how we break out.

@entropyavoider 的头像

@entropyavoider1 年前

See you on the other side boys!

@ChuckBaggett: Use AI apps, not X. Chuck Baggett 的头像

@ChuckBaggett: Use AI apps, not X. Chuck Baggett1 年前

People say all kinds of crap.

cipher 的头像

cipher1 年前

To simulate the universe in all of its perfect detail you run into an aspect Borges' Map Paradox - to create a perfect replication of the universe it would have to be the size of the universe unless you break some laws of physics. There is no scaling down without loss of detail.

Existential Velocity 的头像

Existential Velocity1 年前

If we hack out we probably ruin the simulation, and since we don’t exist outside of it we would gain nothing and loose the existence we have.

相关视频

Roman Yampolskiy: we are almost certainly in a simulation, which is supported by the unlikelihood of living at the most interesting time in the history of the Universe, and AI superintelligence may help us hack and escape the simulation

Roman Yampolskiy: we are almost certainly in a simulation, which is supported by the unlikelihood of living at the most interesting time in the history of the Universe, and AI superintelligence may help us hack and escape the simulation

Tsarathustra

371,998 次观看 • 2 年前

Physicist says we are in a simulation and movement limits prove it. He says we are in something similar to the Sims or World of Warcraft only far more advanced. He goes on to explain the concept in detail.

Physicist says we are in a simulation and movement limits prove it. He says we are in something similar to the Sims or World of Warcraft only far more advanced. He goes on to explain the concept in detail.

𝐁𝐢𝐟𝐟

18,935 次观看 • 14 天前

🚨 Roman Yampolsky: "We are DEFINITELY living in a simulation - the probability is pretty close to 100%" 😱 AI safety legend Roman Yampolskiy just broke it down: “I know never to say 100% but pretty close to that.” He’s got the paper too “How to Hack the Simulation.” His big question: Can superintelligent agents jailbreak out of their virtual box? Elon Musk’s one question to AGI? “What’s outside the simulation?” What if this whole reality is just a test… and the real challenge is realizing the world isn’t real? Have you ever felt the glitches? Do you think we can actually escape? What would YOU ask once you broke out? Drop your wildest theory below 👇

🚨 Roman Yampolsky: "We are DEFINITELY living in a simulation - the probability is pretty close to 100%" 😱 AI safety legend Roman Yampolskiy just broke it down: “I know never to say 100% but pretty close to that.” He’s got the paper too “How to Hack the Simulation.” His big question: Can superintelligent agents jailbreak out of their virtual box? Elon Musk’s one question to AGI? “What’s outside the simulation?” What if this whole reality is just a test… and the real challenge is realizing the world isn’t real? Have you ever felt the glitches? Do you think we can actually escape? What would YOU ask once you broke out? Drop your wildest theory below 👇

Interstellar

152,929 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨AI IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN NUKES AND NO ONE IS IN CONTROL Most people compare AI to nuclear weapons. Roman Yampolskiy says that comparison misses the real danger. Nukes still require human decisions. Someone has to launch them. Someone can stop them. Advanced AI does not work that way. Once powerful systems are deployed, they make decisions on their own. And the people who build them do not truly control what happens next. He says we did the opposite of what safety demanded. Instead of slowing down, we connected AI to the internet, open sourced it, and pushed it forward in an arms race with no serious oversight. Governments talk about regulation, but most of it never materialized. In some cases, rules were blocked before they even started. Yampolskiy’s warning is simple. With nukes, the world tried to limit the damage. With AI, we are accelerating toward something we may not be able to stop. Full conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

🚨AI IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN NUKES AND NO ONE IS IN CONTROL Most people compare AI to nuclear weapons. Roman Yampolskiy says that comparison misses the real danger. Nukes still require human decisions. Someone has to launch them. Someone can stop them. Advanced AI does not work that way. Once powerful systems are deployed, they make decisions on their own. And the people who build them do not truly control what happens next. He says we did the opposite of what safety demanded. Instead of slowing down, we connected AI to the internet, open sourced it, and pushed it forward in an arms race with no serious oversight. Governments talk about regulation, but most of it never materialized. In some cases, rules were blocked before they even started. Yampolskiy’s warning is simple. With nukes, the world tried to limit the damage. With AI, we are accelerating toward something we may not be able to stop. Full conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

Mario Nawfal

24,888 次观看 • 6 个月前

Computer scientist Dr. Roman Yampolskiy says a rogue superintelligent AI can't be turned off and will find ways to take us out that we can't imagine yet. Remember, no matter what the AI "beast" can do, Galactic Federation can do more.

Computer scientist Dr. Roman Yampolskiy says a rogue superintelligent AI can't be turned off and will find ways to take us out that we can't imagine yet. Remember, no matter what the AI "beast" can do, Galactic Federation can do more.

Kab

73,964 次观看 • 11 个月前

We live in the most interesting time in human history and we should feel lucky to be alive Elon Musk

We live in the most interesting time in human history and we should feel lucky to be alive Elon Musk

Tesla Owners Silicon Valley

34,324 次观看 • 1 年前

AI researcher Prof. Roman Yampolskiy: 100% of code for the most powerful AIs is now written by AI, an early form of recursive self-improvement. He says it's a hyperexponential process that results in superintelligent AI, "machine gods", which we won't be able to control.

AI researcher Prof. Roman Yampolskiy: 100% of code for the most powerful AIs is now written by AI, an early form of recursive self-improvement. He says it's a hyperexponential process that results in superintelligent AI, "machine gods", which we won't be able to control.

ControlAI

11,606 次观看 • 5 个月前

Elon Musk: We have to keep our simulation interesting, otherwise we might get terminated. “If the simulation theory is true, then it is actually very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because only the simulations that are interesting will continue. The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring because they're not interesting. In this reality that we live in, we run simulations all the time. When we try to figure out if the rocket's going to make it, we run thousands, sometimes millions of simulations just to figure out which path is the good path for the rocket and where can it go wrong? Where can it fail? But when we do these millions of simulations of what can happen with the rocket, we ignore the ones where everything goes right, because we have to address the situations where it goes wrong. And for AI simulations as well, like all these things, we keep the simulations going that are the most interesting to us. So, if the simulation theory is accurate, if it is true, who knows, then the simulators will only continue to run the simulations that are most interesting. Therefore, from a Darwinian perspective, the only surviving simulations will be the most interesting ones. And in order to avoid getting turned off, the only rule is that you must keep it interesting because the boring simulations will be terminated.” The Joe Rogan Experience, October 31, 2025

Elon Musk: We have to keep our simulation interesting, otherwise we might get terminated. “If the simulation theory is true, then it is actually very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because only the simulations that are interesting will continue. The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring because they're not interesting. In this reality that we live in, we run simulations all the time. When we try to figure out if the rocket's going to make it, we run thousands, sometimes millions of simulations just to figure out which path is the good path for the rocket and where can it go wrong? Where can it fail? But when we do these millions of simulations of what can happen with the rocket, we ignore the ones where everything goes right, because we have to address the situations where it goes wrong. And for AI simulations as well, like all these things, we keep the simulations going that are the most interesting to us. So, if the simulation theory is accurate, if it is true, who knows, then the simulators will only continue to run the simulations that are most interesting. Therefore, from a Darwinian perspective, the only surviving simulations will be the most interesting ones. And in order to avoid getting turned off, the only rule is that you must keep it interesting because the boring simulations will be terminated.” The Joe Rogan Experience, October 31, 2025

ELON CLIPS

16,989 次观看 • 9 个月前

Andrew Pontzen says our universe is not a computer simulation because to simulate it would require a quantum computer the size of the universe itself

Andrew Pontzen says our universe is not a computer simulation because to simulate it would require a quantum computer the size of the universe itself

Tsarathustra

3,799,157 次观看 • 1 年前

James Cameron says "Avatar: Fire and Ash" reflects real-world cyclical violence: “We see it in Ukraine, we see it in Gaza.” #JamesCameron #AvatarFireandAsh #Avatar

AP Entertainment

1,628,043 次观看 • 8 个月前

At #GTC26 we are showing AlpaDreams — generative, interactive closed-loop simulation for autonomous driving. World models generate environments in real time, policies or drivers interact, and the simulator updates the world. If you are at GTC, come by the booth and try it out!

At #GTC26 we are showing AlpaDreams — generative, interactive closed-loop simulation for autonomous driving. World models generate environments in real time, policies or drivers interact, and the simulator updates the world. If you are at GTC, come by the booth and try it out!

Zian Wang

16,923 次观看 • 5 个月前

Jean Charest: "We should not take a bad deal that we will have to live with a very long time. We should stand firm and make sure that whatever agreement we reach, which is probably not going to be ideal, by the way. We know that. We're in that world now. This is the world of Donald Trump. But whatever deal we make has to be in the interest of Canada."

Jean Charest: "We should not take a bad deal that we will have to live with a very long time. We should stand firm and make sure that whatever agreement we reach, which is probably not going to be ideal, by the way. We know that. We're in that world now. This is the world of Donald Trump. But whatever deal we make has to be in the interest of Canada."

Scott Robertson

10,521 次观看 • 5 天前

Ethan Mollick says generative AI has the fastest adoption curve in history, with half of students, teachers and parents using it weekly, and we are not going back to a pre-AI world

Ethan Mollick says generative AI has the fastest adoption curve in history, with half of students, teachers and parents using it weekly, and we are not going back to a pre-AI world

Tsarathustra

71,981 次观看 • 1 年前

Are We In a Simulation? Well, it does work as if we are. So for all intents and purposes you should adopt this mentality! Life responds to you, primarily your thoughts, beliefs, energy and actions. Whether or not there's a giant computer doesn't matter; simulation can simply be an allegory for how this reality operates. As such, we can work with this simulation to create the reality that we desire, and improve our lives. Becoming conscious is the goal. Then, work to understand WHY we are in this "simulation", and what our aims should be...

Are We In a Simulation? Well, it does work as if we are. So for all intents and purposes you should adopt this mentality! Life responds to you, primarily your thoughts, beliefs, energy and actions. Whether or not there's a giant computer doesn't matter; simulation can simply be an allegory for how this reality operates. As such, we can work with this simulation to create the reality that we desire, and improve our lives. Becoming conscious is the goal. Then, work to understand WHY we are in this "simulation", and what our aims should be...

⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬

19,252 次观看 • 1 年前

ELON: IT SHOULD BE PAPER BALLOTS, IN-PERSON VOTING, WITH ID, END OF STORY “I say this as a technologist who likes technology, and I like computers, but we should not have computers do voting tabulation at all. It's far too easy to hack a computer. I know how to hack a computer. Government software is the easiest thing to hack. It's not the best software. In my opinion, we should have paper ballots only. It should be in-person voting, with ID, end of story.” Source: Town Hall in Philadelphia, October 2024

ELON: IT SHOULD BE PAPER BALLOTS, IN-PERSON VOTING, WITH ID, END OF STORY “I say this as a technologist who likes technology, and I like computers, but we should not have computers do voting tabulation at all. It's far too easy to hack a computer. I know how to hack a computer. Government software is the easiest thing to hack. It's not the best software. In my opinion, we should have paper ballots only. It should be in-person voting, with ID, end of story.” Source: Town Hall in Philadelphia, October 2024

Mario Nawfal

149,929 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 ELON MUSK: "We are in the beginning of an immense intelligence big bang right now and we're at the most interesting time to be alive of anytime in history."

🚨 ELON MUSK: "We are in the beginning of an immense intelligence big bang right now and we're at the most interesting time to be alive of anytime in history."

DogeDesigner

141,165 次观看 • 1 年前

Machines used to serve the economy. Now they are the economy. IoTeX built the only infrastructure to connect tens of millions of real-world sensors to AI. In 2026 we scale. Real-World AI that sees, hears, and feels the world and acts in real-time across every industry.

Machines used to serve the economy. Now they are the economy. IoTeX built the only infrastructure to connect tens of millions of real-world sensors to AI. In 2026 we scale. Real-World AI that sees, hears, and feels the world and acts in real-time across every industry.

IoTeX

25,613 次观看 • 6 个月前

ELON: PAPER BALLOTS ARE THE ONLY WAY “I say this as a technologist who likes technology, and I like computers: We should not have computers do vote tabulation at all. It's far too easy to hack a computer. I know how to hack a computer. Government software is the easiest thing to hack, it's not the best software. In my opinion, we should only have paper ballots. It should be in-person voting with ID, end of story.” Source: Philadelphia, October 2024

ELON: PAPER BALLOTS ARE THE ONLY WAY “I say this as a technologist who likes technology, and I like computers: We should not have computers do vote tabulation at all. It's far too easy to hack a computer. I know how to hack a computer. Government software is the easiest thing to hack, it's not the best software. In my opinion, we should only have paper ballots. It should be in-person voting with ID, end of story.” Source: Philadelphia, October 2024

Mario Nawfal

8,017,523 次观看 • 1 年前

“I’m an immigrant. I was born in India.” Joanna Lumley says people are not “not thinking straight” by trying to build walls to “block people out” and instead we should strive to make the world safe to live in again.

“I’m an immigrant. I was born in India.” Joanna Lumley says people are not “not thinking straight” by trying to build walls to “block people out” and instead we should strive to make the world safe to live in again.

Times Radio

914,402 次观看 • 10 个月前

“You are a simulation of a human, a very believable one.” New podcast with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy - out now. We discuss: - Why the universe may be artificial - Why the speed of light may be the limit of a processor - Why you can never prove the world is real Link to full episode 👇

“You are a simulation of a human, a very believable one.” New podcast with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy - out now. We discuss: - Why the universe may be artificial - Why the speed of light may be the limit of a processor - Why you can never prove the world is real Link to full episode 👇

Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪

36,697 次观看 • 3 个月前