Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Ron Johnson: "I support funding for the national security component, what's going to be underneath that ballroom. I don't want to talk further about it than that. But there's certainly a national security component."

Aaron Rupar

1,103,861 subscribers

56,474 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Q: Are Taiwan and the South China Sea national security issues for the United States? Sen. Darline Graham: “I’m just going to be honest here. I’m not that informed on national security, so — but I do support the military.” Wow

Q: Are Taiwan and the South China Sea national security issues for the United States? Sen. Darline Graham: “I’m just going to be honest here. I’m not that informed on national security, so — but I do support the military.” Wow

Republicans against Trump

888,649 views • 6 days ago

Trump-endorsed Senator Darline Graham’s answer to whether Taiwan and the South China Sea are national security threats to the United States: “I’m just going to be honest here. I’m … not that informed on national security, so — but I do support the military. “I’m not a polished politician up here. National security is not my thing, not my area of expertise, but I do support the military.”

Trump-endorsed Senator Darline Graham’s answer to whether Taiwan and the South China Sea are national security threats to the United States: “I’m just going to be honest here. I’m … not that informed on national security, so — but I do support the military. “I’m not a polished politician up here. National security is not my thing, not my area of expertise, but I do support the military.”

Christopher Hale

1,071,967 views • 6 days ago

Q: Should the final bill explicitly rule out funding for the ballroom itself? MIKE JOHNSON: The president is excited about building a ballroom with private funding, not taxpayer funding, but the Secret Service says we have to think differently about security. Congress has a role in funding that.

Q: Should the final bill explicitly rule out funding for the ballroom itself? MIKE JOHNSON: The president is excited about building a ballroom with private funding, not taxpayer funding, but the Secret Service says we have to think differently about security. Congress has a role in funding that.

Aaron Rupar

60,518 views • 3 months ago

Incoming national security adviser, Michael Waltz on TikTok: “I don't want to get ahead of our executive orders but we're going to create the space to — to put that deal in place.”

Incoming national security adviser, Michael Waltz on TikTok: “I don't want to get ahead of our executive orders but we're going to create the space to — to put that deal in place.”

Annmarie Hordern

15,145 views • 1 year ago

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

70,473 views • 10 months ago

Lindsey Graham: "If you don't think $400m of taxpayer is a good investment to create a secure facility at the White House ... the number one job of national security would be to protect the commander in chief, and to have infrastructure under the ballroom that is very national security-centric."

Lindsey Graham: "If you don't think $400m of taxpayer is a good investment to create a secure facility at the White House ... the number one job of national security would be to protect the commander in chief, and to have infrastructure under the ballroom that is very national security-centric."

Aaron Rupar

361,024 views • 3 months ago

Rep. Fry tells PabloReports that his constituents want a new ballroom for the White House, which he says is a national security initiative and an initiative of the American people. PabloReports: What do you make of efforts to include the ballroom in reconciliation? Fry: The ballroom is a national security initiative. I think it’s high time that it got done. PabloReports: Do you think the American people want something more than a ballroom in the reconciliation package? Fry: To me, as a conservative, I’d like to see as much as you can do in the reconciliation product. PabloReports: But as a conservative, isn’t the reconciliation process the thing that’s blowing up the national debt more than anything else? Fry: Reconciliation is a vehicle to reconcile things that are going out of whack. The ballroom is an initiative of the American people. PabloReports: Are your constituents saying they want masked ICE agents and a ballroom, or are they saying they want lower prices? Fry: I think they want both.

Rep. Fry tells PabloReports that his constituents want a new ballroom for the White House, which he says is a national security initiative and an initiative of the American people. PabloReports: What do you make of efforts to include the ballroom in reconciliation? Fry: The ballroom is a national security initiative. I think it’s high time that it got done. PabloReports: Do you think the American people want something more than a ballroom in the reconciliation package? Fry: To me, as a conservative, I’d like to see as much as you can do in the reconciliation product. PabloReports: But as a conservative, isn’t the reconciliation process the thing that’s blowing up the national debt more than anything else? Fry: Reconciliation is a vehicle to reconcile things that are going out of whack. The ballroom is an initiative of the American people. PabloReports: Are your constituents saying they want masked ICE agents and a ballroom, or are they saying they want lower prices? Fry: I think they want both.

Acyn

204,112 views • 3 months ago

Lindsey Graham says he is asking for the WH Ballroom funding bill to be expedited: I’d like the vote ASAP to accelerate what America needs. It has infrastructure vital to our national security.

Lindsey Graham says he is asking for the WH Ballroom funding bill to be expedited: I’d like the vote ASAP to accelerate what America needs. It has infrastructure vital to our national security.

Acyn

116,284 views • 3 months ago

Guess which country this national dish Is from? I added a protein component to it 🤝

Guess which country this national dish Is from? I added a protein component to it 🤝

PrincessFromBabylon

73,395 views • 2 years ago

I’m a student or national security. I still argue that pausing/blocking Satluj for ‘national security’ reasons makes zero sense:

I’m a student or national security. I still argue that pausing/blocking Satluj for ‘national security’ reasons makes zero sense:

Shiv Aroor

143,707 views • 1 month ago

BESSENT: The ballroom is a national security matter HASSAN: That's ridiculous and I think you know it

BESSENT: The ballroom is a national security matter HASSAN: That's ridiculous and I think you know it

Aaron Rupar

143,697 views • 2 months ago

FOX: I can understand people may not want to look at wind turbines and they may not be cost efficient, but what's the national security concern? BURGUM: The national security concerns as delivered by a classified Dept of War report focus around radar and radar interference

FOX: I can understand people may not want to look at wind turbines and they may not be cost efficient, but what's the national security concern? BURGUM: The national security concerns as delivered by a classified Dept of War report focus around radar and radar interference

Aaron Rupar

314,252 views • 8 months ago

Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that the Epstein files will be redacted due to national security concerns. Why do the Epstein files need to be redacted for national security?

Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that the Epstein files will be redacted due to national security concerns. Why do the Epstein files need to be redacted for national security?

Shadow of Ezra

9,691,481 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Trump on if he is willing to break up NATO to acquire Greenland: "I think something is going to happen that is going to be very good for everybody. Nobody has done more for NATO than I have, in every way. ... We will work something out where NATO is going to be very happy and where we're going to be very happy. But we need [Greenland] for security purposes. We need it for national security and even world security. It's very important."

🚨 Trump on if he is willing to break up NATO to acquire Greenland: "I think something is going to happen that is going to be very good for everybody. Nobody has done more for NATO than I have, in every way. ... We will work something out where NATO is going to be very happy and where we're going to be very happy. But we need [Greenland] for security purposes. We need it for national security and even world security. It's very important."

Ryan Saavedra

33,341 views • 7 months ago

Q: "Can you talk to us about the Greenland talks?" Vice President JD Vance: "Greenland is very important to the national security of the United States…If we're going to invest in Arctic security…I think it's only reasonable for the United States to get some benefit out of that."

Q: "Can you talk to us about the Greenland talks?" Vice President JD Vance: "Greenland is very important to the national security of the United States…If we're going to invest in Arctic security…I think it's only reasonable for the United States to get some benefit out of that."

CSPAN

13,901 views • 6 months ago

This is an open message to Ross Coulthart to contact me and please talk through why you believe that I should not reveal the location of a giant UFO which is in a building within a building underneath a very high security military facility You leaked this over two years ago but withheld the destination and there is definitely a chance I am wrong but the strength of the evidence I now have is enough that I am going to go public with my findings in three hours time I clearly do not want to threaten National USUKAus Security and it is your potential mess to clean up... I would like to talk it through with you, but more importantly I think it is in the interests of the public to know about the deception that holds back full Disclosure

This is an open message to Ross Coulthart to contact me and please talk through why you believe that I should not reveal the location of a giant UFO which is in a building within a building underneath a very high security military facility You leaked this over two years ago but withheld the destination and there is definitely a chance I am wrong but the strength of the evidence I now have is enough that I am going to go public with my findings in three hours time I clearly do not want to threaten National USUKAus Security and it is your potential mess to clean up... I would like to talk it through with you, but more importantly I think it is in the interests of the public to know about the deception that holds back full Disclosure

Moneypenny

3,625,046 views • 1 year ago

America Needs the Clarity Act... Coinbase 🛡️ CEO Brian Armstrong has pushed for the immediate legislative passage of the "Clarity Act," framing digital asset regulation as a vital component of U.S. national interests. Armstrong asserts that "economic security is national security," urging Washington to resolve the jurisdictional friction between the SEC and CFTC. According to him, America needs the Clarity Act...

America Needs the Clarity Act... Coinbase 🛡️ CEO Brian Armstrong has pushed for the immediate legislative passage of the "Clarity Act," framing digital asset regulation as a vital component of U.S. national interests. Armstrong asserts that "economic security is national security," urging Washington to resolve the jurisdictional friction between the SEC and CFTC. According to him, America needs the Clarity Act...

BSCN

23,404 views • 21 days ago

Sen. Darline Graham (R-SC) is asked at #SCSen debate about Taiwan and the South China Sea: "I’m just going to be honest here; I’m not that informed on national security, so — but I do support the military. My brother was in the Air Force for 33 years...I'm not a polished politician up here. National security is not my thing, not my area of expertise, but I do support the military." Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) then responds. Full video here:

Sen. Darline Graham (R-SC) is asked at #SCSen debate about Taiwan and the South China Sea: "I’m just going to be honest here; I’m not that informed on national security, so — but I do support the military. My brother was in the Air Force for 33 years...I'm not a polished politician up here. National security is not my thing, not my area of expertise, but I do support the military." Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) then responds. Full video here:

CSPAN

436,193 views • 6 days ago