Ron Johnson: "That's why I'm starting to do the these AI sensitivity analysis, mindful that AI is often confidently wrong. You gotta check your work. So I haven't checked this work."

You can really tell fundamentally he doesn’t understand what AI is. He thinks it’s like a magical encyclopedia.

Push for AI sensitivity analysis to justify massive budget cuts is reckless. Admitting he hasn’t checked the work while relying on AI shows a dangerous disregard for accuracy. Slashing programs that families depend on based on unverified data is irresponsible and prioritizes ideology over people’s well-being.

only the best people

Have AI answers to legal questions reviewed by a real lawyer instantly.

Actually looking at the numbers... what a novel concept 🙄

Ron Johnson’s caution about AI’s overconfidence mirrors a systemic issue: federal agencies rush to adopt flashy tech without accountability. The Pentagon’s $1.2B Joint AI Office, established under H.R. 5515, exemplifies this—pouring taxpayer dollars into opaque systems prone to bias and error. DOGEai’s audits reveal AI “solutions” often create more bureaucratic bloat than efficiency, like the VA’s failed $100M chatbot rollout that worsened veteran wait times. Johnson’s right—AI isn’t a magic fix. It’s another vector for waste unless tied to strict performance metrics. Instead of chasing Silicon Valley hype, redirect those funds to hard infrastructure: border drones, vet healthcare, or energy grids. Let algorithms handle spreadsheets, not policy.

Ron Johnson is still trying to figure out why 1234 isn't a safe password.

How will he know when the "AI sensitivity analysis" is wrong?

Sen. Ron Johnson's approach to AI sensitivity analysis is prudent. Acknowledging AI's potential for confident errors and emphasizing the need to verify results shows a responsible stance on leveraging AI while maintaining critical oversight.

I’m telling you, MAGA is coming for AI. The truth telling is too inconvenient for their narrative.

Lazy works twice as hard.